Articles by admin

No Image

In Quest For Happier Chickens, Perdue Shifts How Birds Live And Die

Perdue will study the effects of features such as perches in chicken houses. It hopes to double the activity levels of its chickens in the next three years.

Perdue will study the effects of features such as perches in chicken houses. It hopes to double the activity levels of its chickens in the next three years. Business Wire hide caption

toggle caption Business Wire

One of the country’s leading poultry companies, Perdue Farms, announced plans Monday to make both life and death a little easier for its chickens.

The changes are a break with current standard practices in the industry, and animal welfare groups are cheering.

Jim Perdue, chairman of Perdue Farms, says there’s a simple motivation behind the new initiative. Consumers, especially millennials, “want to make sure that animals are raised in as caring a way as possible. With the least stress, the least discomfort.”

On that score, his industry is under pressure. Animal rights groups have released videos recorded inside poultry houses that show chickens with broken legs or with breasts dragging on the floor.

A year or so ago, Perdue Farms invited one of those groups, the Humane Society of the United States, to visit the company and lay out its critique.

“We went through the top issues regarding the poor treatment of animals in the chicken industry,” says Josh Balk, senior food policy director at the Humane Society, adding that the company itself recognized some of the problems.

Attitudes were shifting inside the corporate headquarters at Perdue Farms, in part because of the company’s decision to acquire Coleman Natural, an organic chicken producer, in 2011.

Bruce Stewart-Brown, a veterinarian and senior vice president of Perdue, says his company started to appreciate some of the advantages of organic production methods. “You go into those chicken houses and … there’s several things that really jump out at you,” he tells The Salt. “The chickens are more active. You enjoy being in the chicken house. And you come back and you go, ‘Look, maybe we can transfer some of these techniques to the rest of our chickens.”

One result was an industry-leading initiative to drop the use of antibiotics in conventionally raised chickens.

Perdue is now announcing a new initiative focused on animal welfare. Balk, from the Humane Society, calls it “precedent-setting.”

One part involves procedures for slaughtering chickens and turkeys. Currently, when birds arrive at a typical poultry processing plant, they’re hung upside down in moving shackles. Their heads then go into a water bath that contains an electrical current, which stuns them and renders them unconscious before they’re slaughtered.

Perdue is now promising to abolish the shackles and knock the birds out with gas instead. “It’s a dramatically less cruel way to kill these animals,” says Balk.

Perdue is also planning to change the poultry houses, adding windows to provide natural light and perches for chickens to sit on. This is supposed to encourage chickens to be more active.

And Perdue says it will at least study the idea of using breeds of chickens that grow a little more slowly. That could allow birds to support their weight a little better and walk around more easily. Whole Foods recently announced that it will shift to selling slower-growing breeds of chickens.

Slower growth rates currently come at a cost, though. A slow-growing chicken requires more feed — and thus more money — to accumulate the same amount of meat. Bruce Stewart-Brown admits that this is a “critical” consideration. He’s hoping research will allow the company to minimize the additional cost.

The company is also hoping that any additional costs will be outweighed by increased sales. Jim Perdue says he’s encouraged by the company’s experience so far with its antibiotic-reduction initiative. “We feel that as long as we stay in tune with the consumer, we’ll be OK,” he says.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Texans React To Supreme Court's Ruling On State Abortion Law

People in Texas react to the Supreme Court’s decision Monday overturning a state law cutting the number of health clinics that perform abortions.

Transcript

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Since Texas passed the law at the center of the Supreme Court case, more than half of the clinics in the state that perform abortions have closed. That means that today’s ruling was an emotional one for people on both sides of the debate there. NPR’s Wade Goodwyn has their reaction.

WADE GOODWYN, BYLINE: In women’s clinics across the state, abortion rights advocates gathered this morning and waited to hear the Supreme Court’s ruling. At the Houston Women’s Clinic, they sat together hopefully, anxiously, fearfully, their eyes glued to their cell phones, waiting for the website SCOTUSblog to report the news. Houston Public Media was there, too. Women’s Clinic counselor Jessica Rossi saw it first.

JESSICA ROSSI: Yes. The decision of the 5th Circuit is reversed. Yes, the vote is 5-3.

(CROSSTALK, CHEERING)

ROSSI: Five-three, 5-3. It’s 5-3.

GOODWYN: In Austin, they gathered at the now-closed Whole Women’s Health Clinic. Whole Women’s Health was the lead plaintiff in the case. Heather Busby was there. She’s the executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Texas. Busby says that while today’s decision was a major win, over the last five years, the state has wrecked its women’s health care infrastructure.

HEATHER BUSBY: Since 2011, we’ve lost more than 80 – that’s eight-zero – family planning clinics around this state. And now we’ve lost abortion care clinics which also provided family planning and well women exams and STI screening and treatment. So we have a broken reproductive health care system in this state. Rebuilding it will not happen overnight. The fight continues. It continues to go on because Texas is still very hostile to reproductive health care.

JOE POJMAN: We are very disappointed that the Supreme Court ruled the way it did today.

GOODWYN: Joe Pojman is the executive director of Texas Alliance for Life.

POJMAN: We think it’s a big setback – no question about it. It means that the state of Texas is not going to be able to enforce what we believe are very reasonable safety standards. And that’s a very big disappointment to us.

GOODWYN: The movement and its allies in the Republican-dominated Texas Legislature say that while they may be wounded, they’re ready with another strategy. John Seago is the legislative director of Texas Right to Life. Seago says they will shift focus from protecting the health of the woman to protecting the fetus from pain. They’ll urge the Texas Legislature to pass new laws that prohibit certain types of abortion procedures.

JOHN SEAGO: So in Texas, we’re recommending passing the dismemberment abortion ban, a law that would prohibit dismemberment abortion, the method – specific method of abortion that takes the life of the preborn child by taking its limbs apart.

GOODWYN: As for Planned Parenthood, instead of fighting a rear guard defensive action as it has the last three years, it will use the Supreme Court’s decision to go on the offensive and remove state restrictions on abortion rights. Dawn Laguens is the executive vice president of Planned Parenthood.

DAWN LAGUENS: States like Texas, Ohio, Arizona, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin – all should have regulations that should fall as a result of this.

GOODWYN: And so the passionate fight over abortion moves to its next front, each side every bit as determined as before. Wade Goodwyn, NPR News, Dallas.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Why Was A Prominent Muslim Musician Gunned Down In Pakistan?

Relatives comfort Mujjudid Sabri (front, center), son of Pakistani singer Amjad Sabri, who was killed Wednesday in an attack by gunmen in Karachi.

Relatives comfort Mujjudid Sabri (front, center), son of Pakistani singer Amjad Sabri, who was killed Wednesday in an attack by gunmen in Karachi. Rizwan Tabassum/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Rizwan Tabassum/AFP/Getty Images

One of Pakistan’s best-known singers, Amjad Sabri, was gunned down Wednesday in the city of Karachi, in what police are calling a targeted killing.

The attack occurred when the 45-year-old Sabri was on his way to a television station, where he was scheduled to give a performance to mark the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

The TTP Hakimullah Mehsud group — aka the Pakistani Taliban — has claimed responsibility for Sabri’s death, saying that they carried out the assassination “for blasphemy.” If members of the Pakistani Taliban did carry out Sabri’s assassination, it would be the latest in a string of high-profile attacks; the group has also been accused of being the force behind the assassination of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto, in 2007, as well as the infamous shooting of schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai in 2012.

According to reports in the Pakistani press, two men riding a motorcycle fired shots at Sabri’s car. The singer was shot five times, including in the head. On Thursday, thousands of people gathered in Karachi, to throw rose petals at the ambulance that contained the singer’s coffin and to cluster near his home.

There are also reports that Amjad Sabri’s brother was in the car with him, and was wounded in the attack.

[embedded content]
YouTube

The richly baritoned Sabri was part of one of South Asia’s most celebrated singing families. His late father, Ghulam Farid Sabri, and late uncle, Maqbool Sabri, were known together as The Sabri Brothers. The family specializes in the art of qawwali — an important Muslim devotional tradition. Like his ancestors, Amjad Sabri spent his life singing praises to God and the Prophet Muhammad.

Qawwali is a tradition that has lasted about 700 years in South Asia — home to about a third of the world’s Muslim population — going from Persia into what is now India and Pakistan. It is, for its performers and audiences, a conduit for experiencing the divine.

In South Asia, qawwali is also one of the most popular and relatable expressions of Islam and of Sufism — the hugely diverse, mystical branch of Islam that emphasizes having a personal connection to God, as well as embracing tolerance, peace and equality.

In many areas of the world, local forms of Sufism incorporate other religious philosophies and practices as well as regional cultural references. For example, Sufi shrines in South Asia regularly draw not just Muslim devotees, but Hindus, Christians, Sikhs and others — which has in recent years made them a particular target for terrorist violence. Some qawwali songs explicitly reference religious pluralism and tolerance. That’s worlds away from the ideological goals of the TTP and their allies.

As journalist Murtaza Hussain said in a piece by Haroon Moghul published yesterday by the Washington Post, qawwali was “distinctively Pakistani and was our own unique expression of Islam. That’s why this killing really strikes at the heart and soul of Pakistan.”

Some qawwali songs praise God directly, or the prophet Muhammad, or Ali (who became the first imam of the Shiite branch of Islam), or one of the Sufi saints. Other songs describe the poet’s longing for God — very often expressed in what seems, on the surface, to be a secular love song.

Qawwali draws upon North Indian classical music — a musical style that evolved within an expressly Hindu context — but is also uniquely its own, with call-and-response choruses as well as handclaps and drumbeats that are meant to evoke the human heartbeat. The songs build slowly in speed and intensity, swelling up to ecstatic heights. Listeners are swept up in that lyrical and musical potency, dancing, clapping and singing along. Qawwali is very much a communal experience that can last for hours.

Historically, the qawwali tradition is passed down by male family members from one generation to the next; Amjad Sabri was the only one among his siblings to lead his family’s party, or group.

Mindful of that legacy, Sabri sought to preserve his family’s traditions in his work. He was particularly renowned for performing a song associated with his father and uncle called “Bhar Do Jholi Meri” (“Fill My Bag”):

[embedded content]
YouTube

But his elders were also well-known for experimenting and updating tradition. In the mid-1990s, The Sabri Brothers released “Ya Mustapha,” on the American label Xenophile, which paired this qawwali party’s soulful singing with saxophones. The young Amjad Sabri sings in the chorus of this recording.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Sabri also reached out to audiences through the big screen. He appeared in the 2008 Bollywood drama Halla Bol (“Raise Your Voice”).

[embedded content]
T-Series YouTube

The Sabri family’s own history in qawwali goes back centuries. The family claims (though it has been contested) that they are descended from Mian Tansen, a legendary court musician in the service of the Mughal emperor Akbar the Great, who spread his empire across almost all of the Indian subcontinent in the late 16th century, and whose patronage of the arts and literature were at the heart of a unique Mughal culture.

Great qawwals, or singers who specialize in qawwali, are beloved across the South Asian subcontinent and across the globe by fans from all kinds of religious and secular backgrounds. Like the internationally known titan of qawwali, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, the Sabri Brothers recorded for Peter Gabriel’s Real World label. (I’ve been listening to and writing about qawwali, and interviewing prominent qawwals, for more than two decades; the Sabri family has long been a fixture in my own insatiable qawwali obsession.)

In 2014, Amjad Sabri was named in a blasphemy case in Pakistan, after he had gone on a morning talk show to sing; the qawwali he had chosen to perform reportedly referenced members of the prophet Muhammad’s family. The television channel and the show’s anchors, along with the song’s lyricist, were also named in the suit.

Asghari Begum, Amjad Sabri’s mother, told Al Jazeera that approximately six months ago, three men burst open the front door of the family’s residence, then left after realizing that the singer was not at home.

According to the Pakistani newspaper Dawn, Sabri leaves behind a widow and five children; his oldest boy is 12 years old. Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced on Thursday that the government would grant Sabri’s immediate family 10 million rupees (about $95,000) of financial support, along with covering the children’s educational expenses. In his statement, Sharif said that Sabri’s death came “at the hands of coward terrorists.”

Sabri’s assassination has apparently left other Muslim artists in Pakistan vulnerable. On Thursday, Farhan Ali Waris — who specializes in Shiite religious recitations and was a friend of Amjad Sabri — says that he was shot at in a nearby neighborhood, a few hours after Sabri was attacked.

And among the outpourings of grief and tributes to Amjad Sabri online was this Facebook note from the brothers Mehr Ali and Sher Ali, another great qawwali brother duo: “Hands are shivering.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Clinton And Trump Channel 'Brexit' Reactions Into Campaign Messaging

The presidential campaigns were quick to weigh in on Britain’s vote to leave the European Union. NPR’s Linda Wertheimer speaks with correspondent Mara Liasson about what we learned and what’s ahead.

Transcript

LINDA WERTHEIMER, HOST:

The move by British voters to leave the European Union comes just about four months before Election Day here in the U.S. NPR’s national political correspondent Mara Liasson joins us now to talk about how one could affect the other. Good morning, Mara.

MARA LIASSON, BYLINE: Good morning, Linda.

WERTHEIMER: Now, Donald Trump happened to be in Scotland as the U.K. and the rest of the world were registering the Brexit decision. How did Trump play it, and what about Hillary Clinton?

LIASSON: Trump was triumphant. He was for the Brexit and in statements and fundraising letters he said it was a great thing. He said they took their country back like we’re going to take our country back. In a press conference on his golf course in Scotland, he said this would be good for his business. He said when the pound goes down, more people will travel to Turnberry, meaning that U.S. dollar would go up it would be cheaper to go to England and Scotland. He also was asked whether he’s discussed this with his foreign policy advisers, and he said there’s nothing to talk about.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, said in this time of uncertainty it only underscores the need for calm, steady, experienced leadership in the White House. So it’s pretty clear who she was not talking about in that statement. Her campaign also unloaded on Trump’s response. They called it pathological self-congratulation. They said his first reaction was what’s in it for me. So both candidates are using this earthquake event in Great Britain for their own purposes. But it would probably be a big mistake for either candidate or party to ignore the message of Brexit.

WERTHEIMER: Is there a message for American politics?

LIASSON: I think there is. The Brexit vote was a referendum on globalization. Donald Trump is the anti-globalization candidate. On Wednesday in that big speech attacking Hillary Clinton, he said there’s a wave of globalization that wipes out our middle class and our jobs. So America first, which is Trump’s slogan, is the equivalent of the leave campaign with its identity politics and populist nationalist anti-immigrant sentiment. So you could say the simplest prediction is that Brexit helps Trump, or at least amplifies his message. There’s another way this might affect the U.S. election, and that’s if the economic repercussions of the British divorce from the EU harm the U.S. economy. That would be bad for Hillary Clinton.

And then you have the fact that the sentiment against global elites has been consistently underestimated. You know, the markets had remain as the favorite to win, but there was, in the end, a decisive win for leave, and that suggests to many nervous Democrats here in the U.S. that maybe Trump’s support is also being underestimated.

So in this election, if Trump is the equivalent of leave and Hillary is the status quo, she has a big challenge, which is how to acknowledge this populism and nationalism, how to say to voters who are tired of slow growth and growth that’s not brief broadly shared that she has a plan for them.

WERTHEIMER: Now, Hillary Clinton’s message that she’s a steady hand in anxious times, you think that works for American voters?

LIASSON: I think it’s a strong argument. It’s also a reason why the Brexit vote may not be a direct parallel to U.S. elections. The U.S. campaign isn’t just a referendum on globalization. It’s also a referendum on Donald Trump. He has a powerful message, but he has a lot of deficits as a messenger. Another difference is that the anti-immigrant sentiment in Britain was in both parties, Labour and Conservative. Here in the U.S., the anti-immigrant sentiment is really only on one side – the Republicans.

WERTHEIMER: That’s NPR’s national political correspondent, Mara Liasson. Mara, thank you.

LIASSON: Thank you.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What The 'Brexit' Means For The Pro Soccer World

NPR’s Tom Goldman tells NPR’s Scott Simon what the Brexit vote might mean for the world of professional soccer.

Transcript

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

This is WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News. I’m Scott Simon. And it’s time for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SIMON: The final score – 17 million-16 million, that is, British votes to leave the EU. And don’t think that life’s toy department, sports, will be left untouched. NPR’s Tom Goldman joins us. Good morning, Tom.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: Hello, Scott.

SIMON: Let’s – before we get to the nitty-gritty of that, let’s talk about what used to be the most divisive event on the European continent. (Laughter) That’s the European soccer championships. At least a couple matches ended 0-0. But let’s talk about Iceland and Austria.

GOLDMAN: Well, let’s talk about Iceland, in particular. Iceland won that game. This is a really fun team to root for. It’s the smallest country ever to play in the Euro championships. And it’s making a splash. In its first international tournament, made it to the knockout round, the final 16, after that last-second win against Austria this week.

And the way Iceland did it – there were an estimated 10,000 Icelanders at the match in France. There were about 330,000 people in all of Iceland.

SIMON: That – about to say, that’s 50 percent of the country, yeah.

GOLDMAN: (Laughter) Right. And as midfielder Arnor Ingvi Traustason knocked in the winning goal, the only thing crazier than 10,000 delirious Icelanders was one delirious Icelander, TV play-by-play man Gudmundur Benediktsson.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

GUDMUNDUR BENEDIKTSSON: (Shouting in Icelandic).

SIMON: (Laughter) You know, I hear that out in our newsroom all the time when you and I are on the air. But go ahead, yeah.

GOLDMAN: The actual translation of some of what he said – we are winning this. We are in the round of 16. Never, ever, ever have I felt as good. Now, that’s saying something Scott because a study 10 years ago found Iceland was the fourth happiest country in the world. So feeling good is a common thing there.

GOLDMAN: Now we might get a – what’s the man’s name again?

GOLDMAN: (Laughter).

SIMON: The screamer.

GOLDMAN: You’re going to make me do it again?

SIMON: Oh, all right. Not again? OK. Well, we might get…

GOLDMAN: Gudmundur Benediktsson.

SIMON: Oh, Benediktsson. We might get to hear him scream again. Iceland plays England in Nice, France, on Monday. And I wonder if the Brits are going to get the same kind of reaction the Russian team usually gets.

GOLDMAN: Well, not that exciting, you know. They’ll get some razzing, perhaps, for that vote on Thursday. But this has the chance to be a great match, a real David-and-Goliath contest, even though tiny Iceland making it this far is not a fluke. The country has been building its soccer program for a number of years, thanks in large part to building some quality indoor facilities so players could still play when the weather’s miserable.

On Monday, Iceland’s going against an English team that’s one of the best in the world. It’s had some flat performances in the tournament. Iceland is playing on a lot of emotion. It has nothing to lose. And England has everything to lose.

SIMON: Yeah. Well – and which brings us to the Brexit vote because big-time international soccer, as I don’t have to tell you, it’s a big business that employs hundreds of millionaires who wear shorts. And I wonder – is it going to have any effect on, say, the British Premier League.

GOLDMAN: It may. It may stop the flow of European players to the U.K. or make it harder to transfer. And, you know, there’s also the idea that several American sports entrepreneurs who own Premier League teams like John Henry and the Fenway Sports Group with Liverpool and the Glazer family with Manchester United. If Brexit causes the pound to plunge, it means those owners’ assets value in England will go down. I was told this by economist Andrew Zimbalist. Will that affect the American sports? Does that mean those owners will spend less money on their teams in the U.S.? Zimbalist doesn’t think so. But like everything else right now with Brexit, there’s uncertainty about the sports angle as well.

SIMON: I talk to Andy Zimbalist all the time, too. He’s an economist who knows sports.

GOLDMAN: Very smart guy.

SIMON: You notice how long I refrained from saying Cleveland rocks (laughter)?

GOLDMAN: Amazing self-control, Scott.

SIMON: Isn’t it? So, I mean, what an amazing game and series. Now that Cleveland’s won a world championship, what North American metropolis has limped along the longest without a title?

GOLDMAN: Well, you’d think Chicago with its Cubs. But in reality…

SIMON: Well, but the Bulls and the Blackhawks have won…

GOLDMAN: Exactly.

SIMON: …And the White Sox, yeah.

GOLDMAN: Exactly, yeah. According to Bill Barnwell of ESPN, the metropolis poised to take the torch that Cleveland is so happy to pass – it’s San Diego. Last pro sports title in that city was the AFL championship in 1964 won by the Chargers. Hard to feel sorry for sports fans in a city with gorgeous weather and beaches, but hey, San Diego sports fans are still sports fans, Scott. And they’re hurting.

SIMON: Yeah.

GOLDMAN: They’re tan, but they’re hurting.

SIMON: (Laughter) All right. Go to the beach. Put on SP-something. Tom Goldman, thanks so much.

SIMON: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

President Obama Acknowledges 'Brexit' To Silicon Valley Crowd

President Obama delivered a speech Friday at Stanford University, and remarked on the Brexit vote in front of a crowd of young, tech-forward, pro-globalization attendees from 170 countries.

Transcript

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Heads of state are trying to figure out what the vote in Britain may mean for business, for politics, for the world. President Obama was careful with his wording in the speech that he delivered yesterday at Stanford University. NPR’s Aarti Shahani reports.

AARTI SHAHANI, BYLINE: President Obama was on stage at Stanford at an event called the Global Entrepreneurship Summit. It’s a conference for the young, tech-forward, pro-globalization crowd, people from 170 countries. And of course, the president had to start by acknowledging the major global event that just happened.

(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)

President BARACK OBAMA: I do think that yesterday’s vote speaks to the ongoing changes and challenges that are raised by globalization.

SHAHANI: While his remarks were intentionally restrained – his staff says he didn’t want to rock global markets – his world view was not. He pointed out that the world has shrunk. It’s interconnected.

(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)

OBAMA: All of you represent that interconnection. Many of you are catalyzing it and accelerating it. It promises to bring extraordinary benefits. But it also has challenges. And it also evokes concerns and fears.

SHAHANI: Andrij Zinchenko from Ukraine was indignant and pointed out it was after the vote – not before, but after – that people in Britain suddenly started searching online, asking Google – what is the EU?

ANDRIJ ZINCHENKO: They were voting without, like, proper knowledge what the hell they were voting for. That’s simple. They were searching after the voting.

SHAHANI: Vlad Suleanschi from Moldova says, quite idealistically, that in the future, the internet will help prevent the kind of nationalist mindset reflected in the British vote.

VLAD SULEANSCHI: All the notions of, hey, we are we – us against them. All this stuff will disappear immediately as soon as people get access to all the information in the world.

SHAHANI: He said young people, digital natives, mostly voted against leaving the EU because online, national boundaries matter less. Aarti Shahani, NPR News, Silicon Valley.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Best of the Week: 'Justice League' Buzz, 'Rogue One: A Star Wars Story' Details and More

The Important News

DC Delirium: Justice League set reports revealed the new Batmobile, a full synopsis, villain info, and more.

Marvel Madness: Hannibal Buress joined Spider-Man: Homecoming. Bob Persichetti is directing the animated Spider-Man movie.

Star Wars Mania: Darth Vader was confirmed to be in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. And James Earl Jones was confirmed to voice him again. Details on the main characters from Rogue One were revealed. And more Rogue One photos were released.

Sequelitis: Multiple Paddington sequels are in the works. Noomi Rapace is returning for Alien: Covenant. Miranda Otto and Stephanie Sigman will star in Annabelle 2.

Franchise Fever: Disney has plans for more Indiana Jones movies without Harrison Ford. Dwayne Johnson is rumored to be the Wolf Man in the Universal Monsters franchise.

Remake Report: Another The Saint movie is in the works. Eli Roth is directing the Death Wish remake. The King Kong in Kong: Skull Island will be different. Ron Howard is involved in the Splash remake.

Casting Net: Bryan Cranston will play Zordon in Power Rangers. Vera Farmiga will star in Jaume Collet-Serra’s The Commuter. Kate Winslet will star in the next Woody Allen movie.

Box Office: Finding Dory had the best opening ever for an animated feature.

R.I.P.: Anton Yelchin died in an accident.

Reel TV: A new Ghostbusters cartoon series is in the works. Channing Tatum is turning Step Up into a TV series.

The Videos and Geek Stuff

New Movie Trailers: Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children, Inferno, The Birth of a Nation, Ouija: Origin of Evil, American Pastoral, All Eyez on Me, The Legend of Tarzan, Mechanic: Resurrection, Disorder, The Girl with All the Gifts, War on Everyone and the HBO series Westworld.

Watch: An exclusive deleted scene from Everybody Wants Some!!

See: What Bryan Cranston could look like in Power Rangers.

Watch: An anti drunk driving PSA starring Han Solo. And Star Wars presented in Suicide Squad fashion.

See: What Luke Skywalker was doing up until the end of Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

Listen: The new Ghostbusters theme song is a cover and a mashup of artists.

See: What Finding Dory would look like written by George R.R. Martin.

Watch: Jeff Goldblum reads from a children’s book version of Independence Day.

See: The subject of the hit new documentary Tickled confronts the filmmakers at a screening.

Watch: A history of horror cinema.

See: Many classic sci-fi movies mashed together for a new short film.

Watch: Music video for “Heathens” off the Suicide Squad soundtrack.

Learn: Why an actress in Suicide Squad was scared on set.

See: The original character design for Apocalypse in X-Men: Apocalypse.

Our Features

Interview: Taika Waititi on Hunt for the Wilderpeople.

Classic Movie Guide: An obsessive look back at Jaws.

Geek Movie Guide: 5 video game movies worth another look.

Horror Movie Guide: All the latest horror news and trailers.

Marvel Movie Guide: Does Marvel care about the MCU TV series?

Home Viewing: Here’s our guide to everything hitting VOD this week.

and

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Rio Drug Testing Lab Is Suspended Weeks Before Olympics

Sports Minister George Hilton (top right) visits the Brazilian Doping Control Laboratory in Rio de Janeiro last month. The lab, which had been set to test samples from Olympic athletes in August, has been suspended by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

Sports Minister George Hilton (top right) visits the Brazilian Doping Control Laboratory in Rio de Janeiro last month. The lab, which had been set to test samples from Olympic athletes in August, has been suspended by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Felipe Dana/AP hide caption

toggle caption Felipe Dana/AP

The Brazilian laboratory that was designated to conduct drug testing for the Summer Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro has been suspended by the World Anti-Doping Agency for not conforming to international standards.

News of the suspension came in a statement issued in Montreal. The decision can be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport within 21 days.

The action by the agency that keeps track of doping in sports with the help of three dozen testing labs around the globe comes just six weeks before the games are set to open in August.

As the New York Times reports:

“The Rio lab had a prior disciplinary record and is one of a handful of labs that have had their certifications to conduct drug testing revoked by WADA in the regulator’s 17-year history. …

“While under suspension, the lab is barred from conducting any antidoping analysis on urine and blood samples. It was unclear Friday if the issue would be resolved — and the suspension lifted — in time for the Rio Games, though officials expressed skepticism that such a dramatic reversal could be processed within weeks.”

This is not the first time the Rio lab has been suspended by WADA. The lab was shut down during the 2014 World Cup in Brazil. Blood samples from soccer players were flown to Switzerland for testing.

WADA’s statement did not specify its complaints about the Brazilian Doping Control Laboratory at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

In a statement, officials at the Brazilian lab called the suspension “temporary” and expressed their optimism that operations at the lab will resume as normal in July.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Brexit Created Many Losers, But Some Winners Too. Which Are You?

People watch stock prices on a digital broadcast outside the Bombay Stock Exchange on Friday. Currency, equity and oil markets around the world are feeling the effects of the British vote to leave the EU.

People watch stock prices on a digital broadcast outside the Bombay Stock Exchange on Friday. Currency, equity and oil markets around the world are feeling the effects of the British vote to leave the EU. Punit Paranjpe/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Punit Paranjpe/AFP/Getty Images

This much is certain: Friday was a lousy day to be a saver.

Thanks to United Kingdom voters who decided Thursday to exit the European Union, stock prices plunged all over the world.

Analysts said the so-called Brexit generated massive “uncertainty” that killed the appetite for stocks. No one knows what happens next as the entire U.K. — including England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland — pulls away from the EU.

For decades, the U.K. has been one of the most powerful members of the EU, which encompasses more than a half-billion people doing business in a free trade zone covering 28 countries. So the loss of this key member raises complicated questions about trade relationships and economic stability.

The ultimate impact of Brexit will play out slowly as terms of the “divorce” emerge. But based on what we know now, here are some losers — and yes, winners.

LOSERS

  • People who invested earlier this week. No matter what shares you bought on Wednesday, you probably lost money by Friday. In Japan, the Nikkei stock average fell nearly 8 percent, marking the single worst trading day since 2011. The STOXX Europe 600 Index dropped about 7 percent. In the U.S., the Nasdaq composite index of stocks fell 4.12 percent; the Dow Jones industrial average dropped 3.39 percent.
  • Savers hoping for higher interest payouts. Overwhelmingly, economists now say the Federal Reserve won’t raise interest rates this year. Brexit is seen as an immense setback for global growth; the central bank can’t pile on the misery.
  • Companies pumping oil. Since spring, oil prices have been rising. The price of a barrel of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, which had dropped below $30 in February, had clawed its way back to nearly $52 this month. But with the global economy looking shakier, the price has slumped back down to $47.61.
  • Businesses in poorer countries. Currencies in emerging markets — from Mexico to Hungary to South Africa — plunged in value as investors fled riskier assets. When your country has a weak currency, you can’t afford the imports you need to grow, such as Caterpillar tractors and Ford trucks.
  • British tourists coming to the U.S. The British pound plummeted after the Brexit vote, down nearly 8 percent to $1.37 — the lowest level since 2009. That means U.K. residents planning trips to Orlando had better figure on eating sandwiches in their rooms; their vacation costs have just jumped higher.

WINNERS

  • Homebuyers seeking cheap mortgages. The Brexit vote is pushing interest rates to record lows. So investors in safer U.S. mortgage-backed securities will be plentiful, which means interest rates can remain at very low levels.
  • Procrastinators considering a refi. People who have been thinking about refinancing their debt but keep putting off the task can take heart. You now have more time to fill out those forms because interest rates are not likely to rise.
  • TTIP opponents. If you hate free trade deals, then Brexit will help you put a nail in the coffin of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The trade deal is being negotiated with U.S. and EU officials. But now EU negotiators are going to have their hands full working out a U.K. divorce. There are only so many hours in the day.
  • Supporters of the EU. OK, maybe this sounds crazy. But with economic chaos now enveloping the U.K., the remaining EU members may become more determined to pull together and make their joint project work better. Maybe they will cut back on the annoying bureaucracy and focus more on growth.
  • Smart cookies in the Silicon Valley. With interest rates so low and stock purchases looking risky, wealthy investors all over the world may see the United States as the best place to take chances on startup companies. They have to put their money someplace; the U.S. tech sector may be just the ticket.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Minnesota's Largest Health Insurer Will Drop Individual Plans

At Blue Cross and Blue Shield headquarters in Eagan, Minn., the losses on the sale of insurance plans to individuals led to a change in course.

At Blue Cross and Blue Shield headquarters in Eagan, Minn., the losses on the sale of insurance plans to individuals led to a change in course. Jim Mone/AP hide caption

toggle caption Jim Mone/AP

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota will retreat from the sale of health plans to individuals and families in the state starting next year. The insurer, Minnesota’s largest, said extraordinary financial losses drove the decision.

“Based on current medical claim trends, Blue Cross is projecting a total loss of more than $500 million in the individual [health plan] segment over three years,” the insurer said in an emailed statement.

The Blues reported a loss of $265 million on insurance operations from individual market plans in 2015. The insurer said claims for medical care far exceeded premium revenue for those plans.

“The individual market remains in transition and we look forward to working toward a more stable path with policy leaders here in Minnesota and at the national level,” the company stated. “Shifts and changes in health plan participation and market segments have contributed to a volatile individual market, where costs and prices have been escalating at unprecedented levels.”

The decision will have far-reaching implications.

Blue Cross Blue Shield says the change will affect about “103,000 Minnesotans [who] have purchased Blue Cross coverage on their own, through an agent or broker, or on MNsure,” the state’s insurance exchange.

“We understand and regret the difficulty we know this causes for some of our members,” the insurer wrote. “We will be notifying all of our members individually and work with them to assess and transition to alternative coverage options in 2017.”

Cynthia Cox of the Kaiser Family Foundation, who analyzes individual health insurance markets around the country, says what the Blues are doing in Minnesota is similar to a walk back by UnitedHealth Group, the nation’s largest health insurance company.

“Right now what it seems like is that insurance companies are really trying to reset their strategy,” Cox said. “So they may be pulling out selectively in certain markets to re-evaluate their strategy and participation in the exchanges.”

She said the individual markets just aren’t turning out as expected. “The hope was that these markets would encourage exchange competition and [get] more insurers to come in. … I don’t know if we’re at a point where it’s completely worrisome, but I think it does raise some red flags in pointing out that insurance companies need to be able to make a profit or at least cover their costs.”

In response to the development in Minnesota, Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, highlighted gains in enrolling more Minnesotans in health insurance plans since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. But he also acknowledged the insurer’s departure reflects the instability in the market for individual and family coverage.

“This creates a serious and unintended challenge for the individual market: the Minnesotans who seek coverage there tend to have greater, more expensive health care needs than the general population,” said Dayton. “Blue Cross Blue Shield’s decision to leave the individual market is symptomatic of conditions in the national health insurance marketplace.

University of Minnesota health economist Roger Feldman called the Blues’ departure a major blow to Minnesota’s already troubled individual market.
“What this says about the individual market is that it is very unstable and it has been disrupted by a number of events, and we still don’t know whether it will recover or not from those disruptions,” he said.

Feldman said lawmakers would be wise to pay attention to the unstable individual markets and to shore them up with a carrot and stick approach.

“To get people to sign up in the exchange we need one or both of those,” he said. “The stick could be to raise the penalties on people who don’t buy insurance, and the carrot could be to increase the subsidies for people that do. I think that’s the only way that we’re going to get a decent mix of risks to buy into that exchange.”

Although the main Blue Cross Blue Shield unit is leaving Minnesota’s individual market, its much smaller subsidiary, Blue Plus, will continue to offer plans on the individual market, according to the company statement. Blue Plus has only about 13,000 members, according to his message.

Kaiser’s Cox says that’s typical and leaves insurers a re-entrance option.

MNsure spokesman Shane Delaney said about 20,000 Minnesotans purchased Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota plans through MNsure. He said the vast majority of them qualified for tax credits to help pay premiums. Delaney said all of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield customers losing their coverage next year should look for other options on MNsure, the only place eligible applicants can secure federal tax credits.

This story is part of a reporting partnership with NPR, Minnesota Public Radio and Kaiser Health News. You can follow Mark Zdechlik on Twitter: @MarkZdechlik.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)