Sports

No Image

East Timor's Soccer Team Booted From Asian Cup For Fake Document Scheme

Timor Leste’s Patrick Fabiano, (far left) was one of the 12 players declared ineligible by the Asia Football Confederation disciplinary committee. Joshua Paul/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Joshua Paul/AP

The Asian Football Confederation says it found out that a dozen Brazilian-born soccer players playing for East Timor were registered using phony birth or baptism certificates.

Now, it has booted the East Timor team out of the 2023 Asian Cup. The players involved in the scheme played in 29 matches, which included World Cup qualifying games.

The Football Federation Timor-Leste has been ordered to forfeit those matches and was fined $20,000, with an additional penalty of $56,000 suspended for a probationary period of two years.

The probe found that documents for 12 Brazilian-born players were falsified to show that they had at least one parent born in East Timor. The AFC launched the investigation in June, in collaboration with FIFA, the game’s governing body.

It’s not clear whether the players themselves were involved in the document doctoring.

“The investigations made no finding regarding the validity of the Timor-Leste citizenship held by those footballers,” the AFC stated. “That is a question for the state authorities of Timor-Leste.”

“East Timor has already been eliminated from the current World Cup, and now faces being expelled from 2022 qualifying in a separate FIFA disciplinary case,” according to The Associated Press.

East Timor is a tiny country with a population of approximately 1.2 million people.

The players with fake documents “helped the nation to its first ever win,” the BBC reported. It has had a total of five wins in just under 14 years, the broadcaster added.

The East Timor national team is sometimes “jokingly called the Little Samba Nation for its rapid, and sometimes suspect, naturalization of Brazilian players,” according to The New York Times.

Article continues after sponsorship

Striker Patrick Fabiano, one of the players with fake documents listed today, told the Times in 2015 that he “received an invitation from them and they say: ‘We give the passport, you play for us.'”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

White Sox Prospect Michael Kopech Throws 110-MPH Fastball

On Tuesday, a tweet surfaced showing White Sox prospect Michael Kopech throwing a 110 mph fastball. Although not thrown in a traditional setting, the video has turned heads in the baseball world. NPR’s Robert Siegel talks to Jonathan Hock, director of the documentary, Fastball, about the pitch and its history.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

One hundred ten miles an hour – that’s how fast a minor league pitcher just traded to the Chicago White Sox is seen throwing in a video that hit the internet this week. Now, Michael Kopech was not throwing a regular-weight baseball, and he get a running start. But even so, 110 miles per hour is pretty fast, and Kopech has been clocked at 105 in a real minor league game. To talk baseball in the offseason, I’m joined now by Jonathan Hock. He’s a documentary film director whose credits include last year’s “Fastball,” which is about what you might think it’s about. Welcome back to the program.

JONATHAN HOCK: Thank you, Robert.

SIEGEL: What do you know about this kid, Michael Kopech?

HOCK: Well, oddly enough, when we were filming the documentary, we filmed a national high school showcase game. And Michael Kopech was the kid who hits 95 as a high school senior. And you see all the scouts holding up their radar guns, and there’s this sort of collective gasp at this big, burly kid who’s got the thing that they came to see. Will it translate into success? Well, how can he command it in game situations? We’ll see, but he’s got the velocity. The question remains what he does with it, and that’s the difference between the greatness and the ones we forget about.

SIEGEL: It seems that during baseball games, we see more guys throwing 95, 96 miles per hour. Have pitchers actually gotten faster over the years?

HOCK: Well, pitchers haven’t gotten faster in terms of the top velocity. But the way the game has changed now in terms of advanced metrics and the whole “Moneyball” thing – for pitchers, the strikeout is valued much more highly than it ever was in the past. The other trend is starting pitchers being taken out of the game at a hundred pitches, which means they don’t have to pace themselves for 150, 170 pitches the way pitchers used to, so they can throw harder. And then the relief pitchers changing every inning – they can throw as hard as they can.

So you have this premium on the strikeout, which equals a premium on speed. And then you have the way the managers orchestrate the game so the pitchers can basically throw as hard as they can the whole time. And you see many, many, many more pitches up around 100. That doesn’t mean these guys threw harder than Nolan Ryan and Bob Feller and – but it means they throw as hard as they can a lot more often.

SIEGEL: But you’ve got to admit – under any circumstances, throwing a ball 110 miles per hour – that’s pretty fast.

HOCK: You know, one of the major changes in the fan experience at a Major League Baseball game now is the fact that every pitch – in big, bright lights, the numbers on the scoreboard – the speed is lit up – 97, 99, 102. The hundred-mile-an-hour fastball has become baseball’s slam dunk. It’s not so much the home run anymore. It’s that hundred-mile-an-hour fastball. That’s, in many ways, is the most exciting part of the game for fans these days.

SIEGEL: That’s film documentary director Jonathan Hock, who’s movie about baseball was called “Fastball.” Thanks for talking with us.

HOCK: Thank you, Robert.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bagwell, Raines And Rodriquez Are Elected To Baseball's Hall of Fame

Three baseball stars who avoided convincing connection to steroid use during their playing days — Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines, and Ivan Rodriguez — were elected to Major League Baseball’s Hall of Fame Wednesday. The stars all received 75 percent of the ballots cast by the Baseball Writers Association of America.

Houston Astros longtime first baseman and four-time All-Star Jeff Bagwell is pictured announcing his retirement from baseball in 2006. Bagwell was elected to the Hall of Fame Wednesday. PAT SULLIVAN/ASSOCIATED PRESS hide caption

toggle caption

PAT SULLIVAN/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Jeff Bagwell, a first baseman who spent his entire 15-year career with the Houston Astros, was named the National League’s Rookie of the Year in 1991 and Most Valuable Player in 1994. He was a four-time All-Star who batted .297, while hitting 449 home runs and 1,529 runs batted in. Bagwell is also the only first baseman in history to hit at least 400 homers and steal more than 200 bases. Speculation about steroid surrounded nearly all baseball stars of his era, but as the Houston Chronicle reports, Bagwell never failed a drug test. But those suspicions might have explained why he made the Hall on his seventh time on the ballot.

Tim Raines, fifth in career stolen bases, was a seven-time All-Star and the 1986 NL batting champion. Now he’s in baseball’s Hall of Fame. Matt York/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Matt York/AP

Tim Raines, a left fielder who played for six teams between 1979 and 2002, is known as the best leadoff hitter in baseball not named Rickey Henderson. He was a speedster who ranks fifth in career stolen bases with 808. Raines hit .294 over his career and won the 1986 National League batting title. A seven-time All-Star, he played 13 of his 23 seasons for the Montreal Expos. His confession to using cocaine in the mid-1980s may have diminished his appeal. Raines was elected to the Hall of Fame after being on the ballot ten times.

Ivan “Pudge” Rodriguez is shown watching a Texas Rangers baseball game in 2014. Regarded as one of the best catchers in the game, Rodriguez was elected to the Hall of Fame his first time on the ballot. Sharon Ellman/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Sharon Ellman/AP

Ivan “Pudge” Rodriguez was elected on his first appearance on the writers’ ballot. He is widely known as one of the best defensive catchers to play the game. He could hit with authority too, with a .296 career batting average, 311 home runs, and 1,332 runs batted in over 21 years in the majors. Rodriguez was the American League’s Most Valuable Player in 1999 and is perhaps best known for his years with the Texas Rangers and Detroit Tigers. Rodriguez attracted his share of suspicion about steroid use. When asked about those rumors in 2009, he replied, “Only God knows.”

Article continues after sponsorship

Rodriguez, Raines, and Bagwell will be inducted into the Hall of Fame at Cooperstown, N.Y., on July 30.

Two other stars from baseball’s steroid era, slugger Barry Bonds and pitcher Roger Clemens did not make the cut. Both missed the 75 percent threshold for the fifth straight year.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Obama Pardons Famous Hotelier And Baseball Star

In a flood of clemency orders before he leaves office, President Obama commuted the sentences of 209 people and pardoned 64 others on Tuesday. The vast majority of offenders had been convicted of drug-related crimes. Two were involved in cases about leaks of government material. And two were cultural stars of past decades who had run afoul of the IRS.

Ian Schrager in front of his new, luxurious Hotel Delano in Miami Beach, Florida on Sept. 13, 1995. Schrager, who was convicted of tax evasion in 1979, was pardoned by President Obama. Rick Bowman/ASSOCIATED PRESS hide caption

toggle caption

Rick Bowman/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Ian Schrager, the co-founder of the famous nightclubs Studio 54 and the Palladium, who then created boutique hotels, spent a year in prison between 1980 and 1981 and paid a $20,000 fine for tax evasion. His business partner, Steve Rubell, had drawn the attention of federal authorities by bragging that Studio 54 made money second only to the Mafia. The two came out of prison and eventually re-created the hotel industry by making accommodations luxurious and hip. Rubell passed away in 1989. Schrager, whose name is often associated with New York’s gliteratti has said of his jail time, “I made certain mistakes and I paid for them.”

Willie McCovey of the San Francisco Giants pictured in April 1966 near the height of his 21 year career. He pleaded guilty to tax evasion in 1995 and was pardoned by President Obama. AP hide caption

toggle caption

AP

Willie L. McCovey had his troubles with the tax man too. He was once one of Major League Baseball’s most feared sluggers as a teammate with Willie Mays on the San Francisco Giants in the 1960s and 1970s. Nicknamed “Stretch” for his ability to dig out errant throws to first base, McCovey had a .270 career batting average, clobbered 521 homeruns and 1,555 runs batted in. He was inducted into baseball’s Hall of Fame in 1986, his first year of eligibility. The water just outside of the Giants ballpark, McCovey Cove, is named for him. Most fans probably overlooked his guilty plea in 1995 after he was accused of not reporting all of the cash income he made from signing autographs at sports memorabilia shows. McCovey was sentenced to two years probation and a $5,000 fine.

NPR thanks our sponsors

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

San Diego Chargers' Fans Look To Erase Bolt Tattoos

The Chargers announced the NFL team is moving to Los Angeles for the 2017 season. Fans know now their relationship with the team wasn’t forever. Fans that got tattoos want them off.

RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Good morning. I’m Rachel Martin. San Diego Chargers fans now know their relationship with their football team wasn’t forever. And those bolt tattoos they got to represent their fan love – well, now they want them off. The Chargers announced they’re moving to LA for the 2017 season. And tattoo parlors are now offering discounts to help people through this, quote, “painful endeavor” by refashioning the Chargers icons into something else – maybe an Oakland Raider shield. Actually you might want to hold off on that one. It’s MORNING EDITION.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

San Diego Chargers To Move To Los Angeles

San Diego Chargers fans were upset by the owner’s announcement that the team will move to Los Angeles. Juliet Litman, managing editor of The Ringer, talks about reaction from fans.

LOURDES GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:

The owner of the San Diego Chargers has confirmed after much speculation that he’s moving his team to LA. Chargers fans did not take it well. At least one fan lobbed eggs at the team’s headquarters. Others burned memorabilia.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: I just took my Charger gear off and put it in the pile with the rest of them like the garbage that the Chargers are.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I’ve spent a lot of money. I’m a season ticket holder. And it just makes me sad that I can’t be anymore.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: My mom and my uncle, they’re probably turning over in their grave right now ’cause they’re the reason that I’m a Charger fan right now.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: We’re going to talk about the agony of abandonment on this week’s Sunday Sport Chat, our weekly conversation about sports and culture on and off the field. Joining us today is Juliet Litman. She’s managing editor of the sports website The Ringer. Thanks so much for being with us.

JULIET LITMAN: Yeah, no problem. Thanks for having me.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Let’s talk about the Chargers particularly. What do they mean to their fans? We just heard there one man talking about a family legacy, real grief.

LITMAN: Well, I think NFL teams in general inspire so much connection between the fans and the players and the organization. And I think that the most sort of dramatic examples of fan abandonment, as you put it, really come from NFL teams. And that, of course, includes the Chargers. I think it’s also a little bit trickier here opposed to a move like the Rams last year where they’re not really moving that far.

So it’s almost like adding insult to injury where the Chargers are so important to their fans and the sense of, like, what the city is. You know, they’re a city with two teams, or they were – the Padres and the Chargers – and now they’ve lost the Chargers. But it’s not like they’ve moved across the country. They’ve just moved 90 minutes away, essentially.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Do fans continue to follow a team like the Chargers when it’s skipped town, or is it like a spurned lover type of thing? You know, I never want to hear their name again. They’ve left me.

LITMAN: Sure. I think it’s definitely more of the latter, of the spurned lover. A lot of – if you read the literature of teams moving, a lot of times it’s compared to a divorce. And the feelings are really quite intense. And I think the divorce metaphor actually works well here because if you care about football, it’s not like you can just kind of block out the team if you want to remain invested in the NFL. You know, there’s a limited number of teams, and they’ll be coming across your news transom. But a lot of the fans that stay invested in the sport move on from the team.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: To keep on with this metaphor, belabor it, if you will…

LITMAN: Sure.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: …Do they fall in love again? Do they – you know, do they find another team to root for?

LITMAN: I don’t know in the case of the Chargers. It seems unlikely there’ll be another team in San Diego any time soon. So I think that you direct your passions towards a different sport or a different team. I remember when the Nets moved to Brooklyn from New Jersey there was a conversation of do Nets fans go with them, or is that a time where when your team is leaving you can just jump on a different ship? And I think that often jumping on a different ship is more satisfying. I think with the Chargers, they’ll keep some of their fans. But I think that it will be a lot of resentment towards Dean Spanos, the owner.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: So team leaves, bereft fans on the one side, and then the Chargers are moving to LA. Let’s use them as an example. That’s a town with a lot of sports teams. Is there room in the heart of, you know, Los Angelenos for a new team? I mean, will the Chargers find a new fan base?

LITMAN: I think it’s going to be tough. I live in Los Angeles, and we’re just coming off of the first Rams season in over 20 years. And, you know, they were playing at the Coliseum. They don’t have their stadium yet. But they were not filling the stadium yet, and that has been a big narrative around them. The Lakers and the Dodgers are so popular here.

And even the Clippers, who have been here a long time, also having moved from San Diego, have yet to find that same dedicated fan base despite the fact they’ve actually been much better than the Lakers for the last few years and they have two legitimate stars in Chris Paul and Blake Griffin. So if that’s any indication of a San Diego team moving up the coast, it doesn’t bode well for the Chargers, particularly since the Rams are still trying to find – like, re-find their footing as a Los Angeles team.

GARCIA-NAVARRO: Juliet Litman of The Ringer. Really enjoyed having you on. Thanks.

LITMAN: Thanks so much.

(SOUNDBITE OF TRIBECA SONG, “GET LARGE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Snowstorm Didn't Stop This LeBron James Fan From Catching The Game

NPR sports correspondent Tom Goldman’s son Max really likes LeBron James, so Goldman got the two of them tickets to see the Cleveland Caveliers play. Then a snowstorm hit.

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

And one more sports story left. The NBA champion Cleveland Cavaliers and the Portland Trail Blazers played a midseason game this week. January games are not usually considered momentous. But for our friend and Portland-based NPR’s sports correspondent, Tom Goldman, and his son, this game was.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: Like zillions of kids who play basketball, my son Max loves LeBron James – always has. Even when Steph Curry became the NBA’s it guy, Max stayed true to LeBron. But he never saw him play in person. So for Max’s recent 18th birthday, I bought two tickets to see LeBron and the Cavaliers this week.

As the day approached, his excitement was mixed with apprehension. Fans in Memphis recently were furious when James didn’t play in a game there. Resting your superstars has become more common and a point of contention in the NBA. But Max and I decided to stay positive, believing LeBron would play. The big day finally came. And so did the snow.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED NEWS ANCHOR #1: And there’s the cars just littering the roadway that were left last night.

UNIDENTIFIED NEWS ANCHOR #2: And those abandoned cars still – yes. Just by the dozens…

GOLDMAN: News stations heralded Portland’s biggest snowstorm in 20 years. It brought the city to a screeching halt. But the game was on. And the latest word was everyone would play, including you know who. One problem – our 20 to 30-minute car trip to the arena now was impossible. The light-rail train was an option. But the nearest station was a two to three-hour hike. Who would be crazy enough to do that in the freezing cold and snow?

Boots?

MAX: Check.

GOLDMAN: Warm socks?

MAX: Two pairs of socks – check.

GOLDMAN: Gloves?

MAX: Check.

GOLDMAN: Tickets?

MAX: Check.

GOLDMAN: Tickets right there. It’s 2:30. Game’s at 7:30.

MAX: 7:30?

GOLDMAN: We’ll try to make it.

We set out. And, soon, it started snowing again. But with visions of LeBron pulling him forward, Max set a ferocious pace.

Max, hold on up there. He’s a full hundred yards ahead of me. He’s actually been jogging a few times uphill.

The whole first part of the trip had been uphill. We got to the top after an hour and 40 minutes.

How you feel?

MAX: Better than ever.

GOLDMAN: Better than ever? How are your feet? How are your feet?

MAX: My feet are fine. My legs are kind of sore.

GOLDMAN: Right. Yeah, but you were running a little bit up there.

MAX: Yeah. Well, I wanted to get to the top.

GOLDMAN: Well, hold on. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. One more thing – we can still go back.

MAX: Never.

GOLDMAN: We pressed on and got to the train stop at 4:30, two hours after we set out. The train traveled exactly one block and stopped. A tree had fallen on the tracks. So we got out, walked another 10 city blocks, got on another train. And sooner than you can say frostbite, we were in.

(CHEERING)

GOLDMAN: About 40 minutes before gametime, fans cheered as LeBron James stepped onto the court to warm up. Max opened his mouth but could only muster sounds.

MAX: Uh, uh, hey.

GOLDMAN: After 10 minutes of gawking and Instagramming from courtside, we headed up to our seats and watched the hometown Blazers pound the Cavaliers, 102-86. Normally, Max would be ecstatic. But on this night, anything Portland did was secondary. LeBron was good, not great – twenty points, 11 rebounds. But he also had five turnovers. No matter – he was there. So was Max. Mission finally accomplished. Tom Goldman, NPR News, Portland.

(SOUNDBITE OF LALO SCHIFRIN COMPOSITION, “MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Chargers Say Goodbye To San Diego, Bolt To LA

The San Diego Chargers prepare to take the field before a Jan. 1 game against the Kansas City Chiefs in Qualcomm Stadium, in what was the final home game for the Chargers in San Diego. Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

After years of hints, shots across the bow and a few gentle suggestions, the Chargers have finally done it: Owner Dean Spanos announced that the NFL team will be leaving San Diego for Los Angeles, starting next season.

“San Diego has been our home for 56 years. It will always be part of our identity, and my family and I have nothing but gratitude and appreciation for the support and passion our fans have shared with us over the years,” Spanos said in a letter Thursday.

“But today,” he continued, “we turn the page and begin an exciting new era as the Los Angeles Chargers.”

A letter from Dean Spanos pic.twitter.com/rTNIvrsN1A

— Los Angeles Chargers (@Chargers) January 12, 2017

The move will bring to a close the Chargers’ 56-year stay in the city. The team spent its inaugural year in 1960 playing in Los Angeles, as a member of the American Football League (which would merge with the NFL roughly a decade later).

The first stop in LA didn’t last long; the team moved to San Diego the following year. In the decades that followed, the Chargers made it to just one Super Bowl, which they lost to the San Francisco 49ers in 1995.

Article continues after sponsorship

In recent years, the relationship between Spanos and the city his team called home soured, as Spanos angled for public funds for a new stadium. The Chargers’ current venue, Qualcomm Stadium, opened in 1967 and now stands as one of the NFL’s oldest buildings. The City of San Diego was less than enthused about the prospect of paying for a new one.

The standoff led Spanos to cast his gaze elsewhere, notably in a proposal with the Oakland Raiders to share a stadium in Carson, Calif., in Los Angeles County. That plan was rejected by NFL owners in a vote early last year.

The ongoing dispute even made a recent appearance on Election Day ballots, when a referendum was put to San Diego voters. They dealt a convincing defeat to a Spanos-supported proposal that would have used hundreds of millions of tax dollars on a new stadium in downtown San Diego.

While not necessarily a nail in the coffin, that vote renewed speculation that the Chargers and San Diego would soon part ways.

The departure was not altogether unexpected. Even the young fans saw it coming — like this girl, during the Chargers’ loss to the Kansas City Chiefs on Jan. 1. Donald Miralle/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Donald Miralle/Getty Images

LA, for its part, had suffered a professional football drought for more than two decades, since the Raiders and the Rams both left town in the mid-1990s. Now, after the Rams returned last year, the city is suddenly flush with football teams — especially if you count perennial college powerhouses USC and UCLA.

The newly minted LA Chargers will join the Rams in a $2.66 billion stadium in Inglewood, reports the San-Diego Union-Tribune. That stadium is scheduled to open in 2019; in the meantime, the Chargers will be playing at the StubHub Center in Carson, which will briefly earn the honor of smallest venue in the NFL. According to the paper, the Chargers will also have to pay the NFL a $550 million relocation fee — or, $650 million if they choose to pay in installments.

San Diego fans, for their part, expressed disappointment and frustration, though not surprise.

“It hurts, but we will move on without them,” County Supervisor Ron Roberts told the Union-Tribune. “San Diego is a great community and we are not dependent on the Chargers.”

Lastly, by way of postscript, it must be noted: Bystanders on social media have not exactly been kind to the team’s new logo, which displays a white L and A on a blue background, a la the LA Dodgers — albeit with a little lightning bolt riff.

The Los Angeles @Chargers?? pic.twitter.com/bJmv4LcPME

— NFL (@NFL) January 12, 2017

We present these tweets without comment, merely as a reminder that the Internet might not be the best place to look for a warm welcome.

*checks mentions*
*squints*
*clears throat*

for the record, us & the @dodgers are just friends https://t.co/jBoJhZlYVD

— Tampa Bay Lightning (@TBLightning) January 12, 2017

They’re McDonald’s. We’re McDowell’s. We don’t have sesame seeds on our buns. #Chargers (h/t @jinde) pic.twitter.com/3YHKysrZK5

— Raj Mathai (@rajmathai) January 12, 2017

“Hey can I copy your homework?”
“Yeah but just change it up a little.” #chargers #dodgers pic.twitter.com/K0vKuun2TM

— Breanna Susa (@DrSeuss_7) January 12, 2017

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Hall-Of-Fame Sportscaster Joe Buck Admits To Being A 'Lucky Bastard'

Buck’s new memoir details his experiences in sports and life, including his addiction to hair-plug transplants. When it comes to announcing, he says, “I don’t have a rooting interest for either side.”

DAVE DAVIES, HOST:

This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in for Terry Gross, who’s off this week. Most of us have jobs where we have to behave ourselves. In Joe Buck’s job, he gets to yell.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JOE BUCK: Bases loaded, two out. Hard hit into right, back at the wall – tied game.

DAVIES: Buck is one of the leading play-by-play broadcasters in sports. At the age of 47, he’s done 19 World Series and four Super Bowls. He’ll do his fifth in Houston next month. It’s fair to say he grew up in the business. His father, Jack Buck, was a Hall of Fame announcer who also did World Series games. Joe Buck has won seven Emmy Awards, but he somehow gets more guff from fans on the internet than just about any broadcaster in sports. He’s written a new memoir about his experiences in sports and life, including his addiction to hair plug transplants, one of which went south and nearly ruined his career. The book’s called, “Lucky Bastard.” The luck refers to the good fortune in Buck’s professional career. The other part is from a twist in his personal story you’ll soon hear about. I spoke to Joe Buck yesterday.

Well, Joe Buck, welcome to FRESH AIR. I want to begin by talking about the craft, what you do, broadcasting live sports. You write in this book that – you know, you do radio and television. And you write that television is an act. Radio is about being yourself. What do you mean?

BUCK: Well, I think when you do radio, like what we’re doing right now, there’s a certain amount of freedom that when you walk in and sit down and turn the mic on, it’s you. It’s all you. If I sit down in the broadcast booth and I’m doing radio, I can talk about the weather. I can talk about the popcorn vendor. I can talk about the uniforms that the two teams are wearing. I can talk about the size of the crowd, talk about who’s up in the bullpen.

When I’m doing TV, it’s more of a choreographed dance, in a way. So I’ve got to follow the pictures, or the pictures have to follow me. So there’s a little bit more of a freedom when you’re doing radio play-by-play as opposed to television. I prefer the television side of it. I started in radio. I enjoy the mental gymnastics that go along with matching voice to picture and vice versa and trying to accent the action as opposed to provide all of the action through my words. And that’s really what play-by-play is.

DAVIES: So you can take a minute to think. In television, you don’t want to repeat what everyone’s saying, but you want to enhance their understanding, their enjoyment of it.

BUCK: Yeah, I think by its very nature, it’s redundant, you know, being the play-by-play guy on television. The camera is really the play-by-play person. If you’re the play-by-play announcer, I think it’s your job to be better than just saying what’s on people’s TV screen. So if there’s a ground ball to the right of the shortstop, name the shortstop – Derek Jeter or, in today’s game, Francisco Lindor.

You can make an editorial comment about the play while it’s going on. You don’t have to be bogged down by the details because the camera is showing the groundball to short. So in the midst of that, you can say Lindor to – all you have to say is Lindor to his right, going to be a tough play, got him at first. As opposed to radio, I don’t have time for that.

I have to say Lindor takes three steps to his right, backhands the ball, comes over the top, long throw. He got him. There’s a subtle difference in there. But I think kind of being on the upbeat or, in a musical sense, kind of being off rhythm a little bit is preferable to me as opposed to having to go blow by blow, which is what radio requires.

DAVIES: All right, now I want to play a call of yours, which is exactly about this – accentuating what the audience sees, not repeating it. This is from 2008, the National League Championship Series, Phillies vs. Dodgers. This – our program is broadcast from Philadelphia, so I’m a Phillies fan. I remember watching this game.

And it’s a homerun call. And I’m going to just say two things about what the audience sees because they’re not going to hear this in your call. But what the audience sees is a homerun. The batter is Matt Stairs. He’s a beefy guy with a compact swing, powerful swing. It’s a tense moment. The Phillies are making a comeback in an important game.

So we see this compact swing drive the ball out. And then the other thing is this game is in Dodger Stadium, Chavez Ravine, where the bleachers are relatively small. And you can see the desert in the dark outside. And as the ball flies over the right field fence, you see the ball move from light into shadow. That’s what the audience sees. Let’s listen to your call.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BUCK: Stairs rips one into the night, deep into right, way out of here. And Philadelphia gets a pinch-hit two-run shot. And the Phillies lead 7-5 in the eighth.

DAVIES: Now, I’ve remembered that call for eight years because it’s just a lovely piece of baseball poetry. Stairs rips one into the night as you see the ball disappear into the shadows. You know, writers have time to craft phrases like that. You’ve got to do it in the moment. Is there a technique? Are there muscles that you develop for coming up with that quick, evocative turn of phrase?

BUCK: Well, I think the first thing is you have to be prepared. And if you’re prepared, you can be relaxed. And I’m not giving you a canned answer. I’ve never thought about it in these terms, really. But I think if you are ready for a moment like that – and by ready, I mean you’ve got all the stats of Stairs at your fingertips if you want to go there. You know who’s on the mound. You’re aware of the game’s situation. And now you can just sit back and watch.

It’s when you’re ill-prepared and you’re on the edge of your seat and you’re gripping and you’re going, oh my God, where’s Stairs’ stats and yeah, he is a beefy, left-handed hitter and who’s the guy on the mound and, you know, I’m lost in this game that you don’t see that. I remember making that call. I remember that vividly. And it was one of those – it was like a thump. Those moments and that swing and that connection and that ball flying off his bat kind of hits you in the chest. And it takes a little bit of your breath away because it’s a stunning moment in a really intense game. And so you better be ready for that to happen.

DAVIES: I have to ask about your voice. It’s pretty distinctive. I mean, it cuts through that crowd noise in a way. Did you work on that? Did people talk about your voice when you were growing up?

BUCK: Well, I think most people associate me with my dad. And my dad was a Baseball Hall of Fame broadcaster and NFL Hall of Fame broadcaster, had a gravelly voice. (Imitating Jack Buck) He’d talk like this. Hey, how are you?

DAVIES: Yeah. No, it’s different. It’s a different voice from yours. I remember your dad, yeah.

BUCK: Yeah. And so when – you know, when I started with the Cardinals my first year, I was 20 about to turn 21. And I was getting all the nepotism complaints from the local media outlets, from a radio-TV critic in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, from the Letters to the Editor – can’t believe we’re subjected to Jack Buck’s kid broadcasting these games. And every time you see kid and hear kid, you think, man, I have to not sound like a kid.

And so I went from talking up here – good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the ballpark. It’s a great day for a game – to trying to consciously get my voice down here and say, good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to – and I started to change my voice. And I went from, you know, sounding like I was going through puberty on the air to really sounding like a man.

DAVIES: You, in the book, name some other sports broadcasters that you admire – Mike Tirico, Al Michaels. You choose not to name people you don’t think are so good. But I’m curious, what bothers you in an announcer that you feel isn’t measuring up?

BUCK: Overtalking, doing too much, trying to prove to the audience that they did their reading, trying to make the call about themselves. The way I’ve always done it – right, wrong, good, bad, whatever anybody’s opinion may be – is – let’s take the Cubs winning the World Series for the first time in 108 years this past October. I could choose to make that call all about me, screaming and yelling and, you know, groundball to Kris Bryant, going to be a tough play, out at first. And for the first time in 108 years, the Chicago Cubs have finally won it all. They gather on the mound. Players jumping over – I don’t want to say all that stuff.

I just want to state what happened. I want to do it an exciting way. I haven’t always accomplished that, by the way. And I want to get out of the viewer’s head. It’s not about me. Nobody’s tuning in – let’s check the TV Guide listings and see what game Joe Buck is calling. Nobody cares. They want to see the Cubs. They want to see the Packers. They want to see the Cowboys. They don’t care who’s calling the game.

And so I’ve joked that if I get hit by a bus going into a game, they’re still going to play. And the guys that bother me, without naming names, are the guys who sound like if they got hit by that bus, the game would be canceled.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: And that’s annoying.

DAVIES: Joe Buck broadcasts play-by-play of baseball, football and other sports for Fox Sports. We’ll continue our conversation in just a moment. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. And if you’re just joining us, we’re speaking with Joe Buck. He is a play-by-play broadcaster for Fox Sports, and he has a new memoir.

You grew up in broadcasting. Your dad was Jack Buck, Hall of Fame broadcaster. And he was the play-by-play guy for the St. Louis Cardinals. St. Louis is a huge baseball town. And anybody who follows the game knows that the play-by-play guy for a baseball team is a major celebrity in a city. You’re probably better known and loved than the mayor.

You had quite a bit of exposure to this life as a kid, didn’t you? What was it like? Did you have the run of the stadium?

BUCK: Oh, I did. Yeah, the stadium was my playground. And I was down there with my dad night after night, not just in the summer, but even school nights. And sometimes school nights led to late mornings led to late arrival at school. Baseball in Busch Stadium, I guess for lack of a better term, it was my little romper room.

And so by that I mean I was in the broadcast booth during the game. If I got bored up there, when I was a little kid, I’d run down underneath by the dugouts on the inside part of the ballpark. And other players’ kids would be throwing a tennis ball around, and we’d be throwing it at each other. And I – yeah, I had run of the place.

That was my spot. Every day after school or during the summer, I’d ride down with my dad at 3 o’clock. And then as I got a little bit older, I’d broadcast – at least do games into a tape recorder. He and I would listen to the tape on the way home. It was – it was just a great way to grow up. And I guess without knowing it, I was aiming myself for a life in sports and in baseball in particular.

DAVIES: What kind of advice did your dad give you when you were doing that? Do you remember any feedback?

BUCK: I do. It was – it was more basics. It was about my diction. It was about not every time describing a ground ball to shortstop as a chopper to short or whatever I might have been leaning on at the time. It was, you know, vary it up. It’s a ground ball to short. It’s a screamer to short. It’s a laser to short. It’s a looper (ph) to short. Whatever it is, change it up, but be grammatically correct, have proper diction.

And beyond that, he let me kind of find my own way. And thankfully, he did. You know, had he been on me – especially when we were broadcast partners later – but had he been on me like, here’s how you have to do it, here’s how I would’ve done it, try it this way, do this – I probably would have been like, time out. I can’t handle all this. I’m not – I’m not comfortable. Or, you know, I would have been resentful.

But he didn’t. You know, he found his own way. And he was hands off enough with me to let me know that he cared and let me know that he was in my corner, but he let me find it myself.

DAVIES: Anybody who’s gone to ball games will from time to time look at dugouts between innings or whatever, and you’ll see the bat boy, this young kid who has a uniform without a number, who, you know, picks up bats and picks up the pine tar rag. You had that job for the Cardinals?

BUCK: I did when I wanted it.

DAVIES: That’s huge. What was it like being a bat boy?

BUCK: Oh my God, it was so fun. And, you know, I was this little chubby kid, which I talk about in the book. And the sad thing was the typical bat boy uniform didn’t fit. They’re made for, like, slender, normal-sized kids. And I would try it on in the Cardinal Clubhouse, and the Cardinals’ equipment manager would be like, yeah, we’re going to have to get you another size pants.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: And he’d actually walk down by the players – I was wearing different players’ pants while I was the bat boy. But man, what a great education. I mean, I would run around in the outfield during batting practice and catch fly balls. I’d play catch with players before the game started.

And then, when the game started, it was up to me to run out there to home plate, in the middle of 45, 50,000 people, grab the bat. I’d have to bring new baseballs to the umpire when there were enough foul balls and the umpire needed a new supply of baseballs.

And I’d be around the – not just the sights and sounds, but the conversations that were going on in the dugout. And watching these guys react to success and failure, it really, you know, became part of my DNA without me even knowing it.

DAVIES: And were you invisible to the players, or did you have a relationship with them?

BUCK: No, I was definitely not invisible. No fat batboy is invisible.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: Let me let you in on that secret. When you’re a fat batboy in the ’70s, you are ripe for the picking for – from different players. So you kind of became one of the guys. I mean, I wasn’t – I’m not insane. I didn’t think because I was there from time to time or, you know, in certain years, night after night that I was part of the group. But I was at least on the inside enough to have guys feel comfortable to, you know, say some snide comment or grab me in the dugout and start pounding on me or whatever it might be. So I at least kind of felt like I was part of the group and I wasn’t an outsider. That was pretty cool.

DAVIES: You write in the book that once a month, your dad would drive over to a house – he would bring you with him, drive over to a house and deliver a check to another family. Explain what was going on here.

BUCK: Well, he was divorced. I didn’t know it at the time. I didn’t understand all that. You know, it’s why my book is titled what it is, which is probably not politically correct or maybe…

DAVIES: Well, we can say the name here. It’s “Lucky Bastard,” right?

BUCK: Yeah. I mean, it’s because I guess in a way I – that’s exactly what I am. First of all, I’m the luckiest guy in the world to be my parents’ son and to be Jack Buck’s son but Carol Buck’s son, as well. And then I came onto the earth as a result of my dad meeting my mom while my dad was married with six kids. And he and my mom ended up getting married a month before I was born. So he had this other family.

And when I was old enough to move around – 5, 6, 7, 8 years old, there were times where I would go with him to deliver a check to this woman and this house filled with six other kids. I knew I wasn’t wanted there. And as time went on, I knew that I represented something really painful in their lives by being, I guess, the direct result of why their dad left their mom. And so, you know, as I write in the book, to this day, I’m not sure why I went on those trips over to his other house, so to speak…

DAVIES: Why he brought you, you mean, yeah.

BUCK: Yeah, I don’t know why he brought me. Maybe because he knew it wouldn’t get out of hand or real nasty if the kid was there because it was tense. And I think without knowing it, I was learning a lot about relationships and about heartbreak and about, you know, in this case, kids who were looking up to a man who, I guess in a very simple sense, let them down.

DAVIES: You tell a story in the book of going to a swimming party at your half siblings’ house. Do you want to share a bit of that with us?

BUCK: Well, I went there. And I kind of was cut loose in that house a little bit. But it – I really – I didn’t feel comfortable. But I remember my half-brother Danny grabbing me and saying, hey, let’s go out and jump in the pool. OK. Well, first of all, as I said already, I was this little chubbster (ph) kid. And I wasn’t all that fired up about taking my shirt off in front of the other kids – or anybody, for that matter. I was probably, I don’t know, 8, somewhere in there, at that age. And he put me on his shoulders and he said, here, we’ll dive in. Well, he put me on his shoulders. He must’ve been herculean to get me up there. And he dives in, and I just smack against the top of the water in the swimming pool. And, I mean, it hurt. And I fought every urge to cry because something told me that that wasn’t the place to do it or I was going to get no sympathy. That was kind of the intent. So I didn’t.

And I remember going inside afterward. And my dad’s ex-wife was cooking hot dogs. And she said, do you want a hot dog? And I said, yeah. And she said, well, what do you like on it? And I said, I like everything but mustard. And I got a hot dog that had mustard on it. And I joked in the book, at the end of one chapter, I ate every bite of that hot dog. Just like I didn’t cry when I got smacked into the water in the pool, I just said, all right, I’m going to eat the hot dog. And, you know, ironically enough, I love mustard now. I can’t get enough. So I’d like to thank her for that.

DAVIES: You know, with the benefit of time, looking back on it, do you think that any chance you were reading some of their resentment into this, that maybe they’d – maybe she just forgot and gave you mustard?

BUCK: Yeah, I don’t think it’s a fair story. It happened. And let me tell you, as we sit here today, the book’s been out for, you know, a month and a half, couple months. My half brothers and half sisters are not happy and specifically about that story. And I understand why. Now, it did happen. And I can remember it clear as day, like it was yesterday. I don’t know that that represents, you know, the overall feelings.

I mean, I don’t – I think while there was resentment for me specifically because I’m an easy target in that situation, common sense tells you it’s not my fault. But my relationship with them, my sister’s relationship with them is not such that we’ve ever really hashed all this stuff out. So now it comes out in a book. And it’s a small part of the book. But I can tell you that if that were said about my mom, I’d be upset because you don’t see the other side of the story. So I get their resentment toward me sharing this. There was tension there. And I represented something that was not good for them.

DAVIES: Joe Buck is a play-by-play announcer for Fox Sports. After a break, he’ll tell us what can go wrong in a hair plug transplant – his own. And I’ll ask him why some fans seem to love to hate him. I’m Dave Davies. And this is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in for Terry Gross, who’s off this week. We’re speaking with Fox Sports play-by-play broadcaster Joe Buck, who does World Series and Super Bowls and has won seven Emmy Awards. He grew up learning baseball and broadcasting from his dad, Hall of Fame sportscaster Joe Buck. He has a new memoir called “Lucky Bastard.”

You got into broadcasting at a high level, at an early age. You did St. Louis Cardinals broadcasts with your dad for – what? – part of 11 seasons, right?

BUCK: Yeah.

DAVIES: Yeah.

BUCK: It’s hard to even remember that and – on one hand. And then on the other, I look back on that as the, in some ways, highlight of my career because my dad, who literally was kind of my buddy more than my father and really my best friend, more than the guy who would come home having to discipline us or the 9 to 5 guy. He was gone for different stretches of time and was on a road trip with the Cardinals. And then when that would bleed into football, he was into that. And then he was doing a radio show in St. Louis.

There was a lot of time that I gave up with my dad. So consequently, when he and I were together, I didn’t want to waste that time with him having to discipline me. And so I acted the right way as a little kid. And we had the best possible, I think, father-son relationship that we could have.

And then when we were paired together and I was on all those buses and I was on all those road trips with him and I was getting on the team charter and I was, you know, riding home from the airport at 2 o’clock in the morning after a road trip to Houston, I got a lot of that time back. And so whether it’s my half brothers and sisters or my full sister Julie, I saw him in a different way.

DAVIES: You did a lot of baseball, including some minor league broadcasts in Louisville. Did you ever – were you ever in a situation where you used sound effects to recreate the crack of the bat…

BUCK: (Laughter).

DAVIES: …Or anything like that?

BUCK: No, no, I was not doing, like, the Ronald Reagan, you know, crack of the bat in the background or recreating or any of that. It probably would have enhanced the broadcast because you’re doing games at times for, let’s say, intimate gatherings at the old ballpark. And there’s not a whole lot of natural sound.

I saw my dad recreate games during the baseball strike in the early ’80s. And it was fascinating because they were taking old games – they knew the box score and they were just making up the play-by-play. And he gave me the two bats. And he would kind of point to me like, here’s a two-two pitch. And he’d point to me, and I’d hit these two bats together and be like (imitating crack)…

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: …And then, he would go on and, you know, there’s a ground ball to short. And Groat picks it up and throws over to first. He got him, two away. And…

DAVIES: So this was in a strike in the ’80s? They would – just so that baseball players wouldn’t go into withdrawal – baseball fans wouldn’t go into withdrawal…

BUCK: Yes.

DAVIES: They would recreate an old game?

BUCK: Is that crazy?

DAVIES: Wow.

BUCK: They went back – yeah, it’s kind of genius. The local station in St. Louis went back and they said, how great would it be to hear Jack Buck and Mike Shannon recreate old World Series games from the ’60s? And so they did that. And they had the box score. They went off that. They knew what happened each inning. They were making up the pitch-by-pitch. But they sat in a studio like I’m sitting in now. And I sat in the corner. And he’d point to me, and I’d make the bat crack. So I guess I’ve had some at-bats in the big leagues that…

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: …That really don’t go down in the record books.

DAVIES: A big change in your career came when the Fox television network went into sports. And a lot of people saw – thought, like, what? One of the interesting things you write about Fox is that they were trying new stuff, including sending you to cover a bass fishing tournament. Tell us about that.

BUCK: Yeah, I think I’ve repressed it somewhere in my memory. It was a live bass fishing tournament. And the head of Fox Sports, David Hill – who eventually went on to run the network as well for a while, just kind of a trusted lieutenant for Rupert Murdoch – called me and said, how would you like to – he’s Australian. I won’t bother you with the accent.

DAVIES: Oh, go ahead.

BUCK: How would you like to do bass fishing? And I’m like, what? Bass fish – I don’t fish. I’m not an outdoorsman. I’d rather go see a movie. I don’t want to hunt anything. But you’re going to broadcast bass fishing. It’s going to be the next NASCAR.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: Well, it wasn’t the next NASCAR. And it was a live bass fishing show on TV. Those are words that should never be in the same sentence…

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: …Because somebody forgot to tell the bass between 4:30 and 6:00 on that particular night to bite because we were going on all these different boats and talking to these different anglers, fishermen, and none of them are catching anything. And the big payoff at the end of this event is a weigh-in with the fish. And we messed that all up. It was just a nightmare.

DAVIES: As you had this growing TV career, you had a friend and mentor at the network, a guy named Steve Horn, who pulled you aside and gave you a couple of pieces of advice. What were they?

BUCK: One, he said – well, he started it with you may want to punch me in the face after I tell you what I’m going to tell you. He took me to lunch, which is ironic considering what he was about to tell me. He said one, you need to lose 25 pounds. I was – as I’ve told you, I was a fat kid. I became a fat adult. And I – you know, I have a big head anyway. And I looked like my head weighed about 84 pounds…

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: …When I showed up on your television. And he said, you need to lose 25 pounds. I said, all right, yeah. You’re not the first person to tell me that. I’ve certainly thought about it many times, like, every morning. But thanks for the advice. And he said two, you need to think about getting hair plugs. You need to think about hair transplant surgeries. And I said, well, funny you should say that. I’ve had two.

DAVIES: It’s interesting. I don’t think I quite knew what a hair plug was until I read your book. This is actually – you pull hair out of the back part of your head and transplant…

BUCK: Well, you cut. Let’s call it what it is. They cut a tract of hair. When a man – really anybody, but I know a man – whatever it is about the male genome, but the bishop’s crown is usually healthy hair for the rest of your life. You may lose everything on top, but you’re going to have the Gavin MacLeod, Merrill Stubing hair around your ears and around the back of your head. So they take a tract of hair out of the back. They cut it out.

And then a nurse goes over or an assistant goes over and starts cutting out actual living bulbs of hair. And they then put slits in the top of your head, crafted by a genius plastic surgeon, to make a realistic hairline. And that hair just goes from growing in the back of your head to actively growing in the front of your head. And that gives you growing hair for the rest of your life. And instead of it, you know, being back there, it’s up front.

DAVIES: And it’s not the most pleasant thing to undertake, is it?

BUCK: It is literal torture. There is nothing – I’ve done eight of them. And I’m sure we’ll get to what the eighth presented me with. But the first six I did under local anesthetic, which when people say, well, they’re going to give you anesthesia – well, how do they give you anaesthesia? Through a syringe.

And what noise a syringe makes when it goes into your scalp, on the inside of your head, is otherworldly. And then they give you enough shots to numb that area up in the back of your head that they dig that tract of hair out. And then they start on the front of your head – the top your head. And you’re feeling all these needle pricks going in, and it’s – I mean, it’s enough to make you cry.

DAVIES: OK. And…

BUCK: Hopefully nobody’s eating while they’re listening to this.

DAVIES: You confessed to this as an addiction to hair plugs, but the fact is you want to look your best for television. One of these – the last of these hair plug transplant operations lead to a real problem for you. Tell us about that.

BUCK: Well, yeah. It went from let’s do it under local anesthetic to – I mean, the surgeon knew how much I hated this. And whatever addiction there was, it’s painful. It’s awful. It would be – you’d be a masochist. It was like once you start – that’s kind of the big trick of the thing. Once you start, you have to kind of keep going and keep up with the natural hair loss to try and stay ahead of the curve. So there’s the addiction.

You know, we’ve all seen people that you know have had transplant surgeries where they’re like, I’m done. That was awful. I’m going to do one. And then they’ve got one little tuft of hair coming out of nowhere. And that’s a telltale sign. So the doctor said, you should do it under general anaesthetic. I was, like, wow. I didn’t even know I could do that. And the last one I did, I went under and I came out and I was unable to talk. I sounded like this. And unless I was doing “Godfather V,” it was really not beneficial for my career.

I thought I was done. And what happened was when they put me under – they put a tube, a breathing tube, down your throat for any procedure. I didn’t have to fess up that that’s what this was. But I figured if I’m going to write a book, I’m going to write a book. I’m going to bare it all.

But for any surgery, they put a tube down your throat so you breathe while you’re under. And then the cuff that they put in to hold that tube in place got overinflated and it sat on the nerve – the laryngeal nerve, which fires my left vocal cord – and it bruised it or damaged it or insulted it, whatever you want to say. And the nerve went dead. And my vocal cord went dead.

So I came out of that with one-half of a normal voice. Where the vocal cords normally meet in the middle to make your sound, one was going to the middle and the other was laying on the side. And I thought I was finished.

DAVIES: And this lasted months, right? And you managed to work through it?

BUCK: It lasted – yeah, I would say it happened in March. And I never missed a game. I sounded terrible. I did the Jimmy Fallon show, tried to sing on that, just messing around. And I came out of there thinking, oh, it sounded OK. But this situation with my voice and that laying-there vocal cord lasted until the end of October, early November.

And I went to the best vocal restoration surgeon in the world. He’s a genius. His name’s Steve Zeitels in Boston. And when I first saw him, he said, how long has it been since you’ve been able to talk normally? And at that point it was, I don’t know, a month. And he said, well, let me just tell you, my experience is that if you don’t have your voice back in three months, you’re not going to get it back.

And that started a time clock in my head. And I went past three months – four months, five months, six months – and eventually it came back. But he – I would – he would go in and he would shoot restylane into my laying-there vocal chord, my dead vocal chord. And it would puff it up enough to where the vocal chords would meet just enough to where I could make a little bit better sound.

DAVIES: Joe Buck is a play-by-play broadcaster for Fox Sports, and he has a new memoir. We’ll continue our conversation after a short break. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. And if you’re just joining us, we’re speaking with Fox sportscaster Joe Buck about his life and career. He has a new memoir.

Last summer, I played golf – I know you like to play golf – and I got teamed up with a father and son. And the son, who was in his 20s, works at Fox Sports. And we were having a beverage afterward and I mentioned that I might be talking to you about the book. And he said, yeah, a lot of people can’t stand Joe Buck. And I said, well, why? Is he a jerk? And he said, no, no. He’s a good guy. But just a lot of people don’t like him.

And when I looked at the internet, I discovered there is this bunch of people that don’t like you. There’s an I Hate Joe Buck fan club on Facebook. One guy writes, I wonder how many times Joe Buck looks at himself in the mirror and winks. Somebody says, an arrogant ass who thinks he’s a celebrity, always rooting for San Francisco in the World Series. What’s this about?

BUCK: That particular one is unbelievable. If you go – you should walk the streets with me in San Francisco and see the looks I get. And this answers the question. If it wasn’t me doing what I do and it was somebody else, the same thing would be said.

And I say that because – OK, take the he thinks he’s a celebrity or he’s arrogant out of it. I don’t think I’m a celebrity. I certainly don’t believe that I’m arrogant. My wife thought the same thing until she met me. She saw me on a National Car Rental commercial and thought, oh, he looks like an arrogant ass. And then, I don’t know, within months I was married to her. So I converted her. I can convert you.

But when you do the World Series, and you show up at the most important time of the year, and you’ve got baseball fans on either side who have listened to their announcers all season long who do the game from their perspective, who have the same rooting interest as the fans they talk to – and now when it matters most here comes the national guy who doesn’t represent them, he doesn’t represent the other side. And so consequently, each side thinks I’m for the other because they don’t hear games done that way all year.

Oh sure, they’ll hear somebody scream and yell for a Pablo Sandoval homerun for the San Francisco Giants back in the day. And they’re used to that, but they’re not used to then me turning around and yelling and screaming for a homerun by Miguel Cabrera. So it sounds – hits their ear funny. That’s not what they hear all year long. They want to hear their guys do their games.

And I represent somebody who has a rooting interest for neither side. And it’s kind of like being trapped in the middle there. And so that’s where that comes from. I don’t take it personally. And I know that whenever I’m finished, whoever steps into that seat – it may not happen right away, but after a while people are going to go, well, this guy sucks, too. Where’s that other guy?

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BUCK: He doesn’t like my team either. What’s going on? It’s just that the fans care so much that if you’re not in their camp you’re, in their mind, against them. And it’s a tough way to be if you let that stuff bother you.

DAVIES: I think it bears mentioning here that we live in an age when everybody has access to Twitter and there are a million blogs. And if you have 10 million people listening to you and 1 percent don’t like you, that’s 100,000 people. And some of them will make some noise. It’s partly a function of the media age we live in.

BUCK: And my dad got it. You know, my dad got it. Vin Scully used to laugh about it. Vin Scully was the voice of the Dodgers. And he’ doing the World Series between the Dodgers and the A’s and he called the Kirk Gibson homerun for, in essence, his team on national TV. And then he talked to my dad when my dad did it for two years. You know, that didn’t go well for my dad for two years. And he made a comment one time about Bobby Vinton, who was singing the national anthem in Pittsburgh. And he was trying to be cute about Bobby Vinton messing up the “Star-Spangled Banner.” And when he got back to his hotel room, he and my mom walked in and there was a footprint in the middle of his pillow on his bed.

And so that stuff has always existed. But he – you know, his complaint box were actual handwritten letters. Mine is in 140 characters or less. And so if I want to go to Twitter and absolutely end my career by realizing how many people are on there knocking me around for the size of my head, or he’s growing a beard, or he’s arrogant, or he hates my team, you know, then bring a snorkel. And good luck because you’re never going to get out of there alive.

DAVIES: I can’t let you get out of here without noting that there are three or four NPR jokes in the first 20 pages of your book. I think you refer to…

BUCK: Right, sorry.

DAVIES: …An NPR host who’s on Ambien. You don’t listen to public radio? It doesn’t appeal to you?

BUCK: Well, ironically enough, I started my career in essence when I was in high school doing my internship at the NPR station in St. Louis. So NPR is actually – now that I’ve grown to be a man, it’s fantastic radio. But I made the joke in my book because that’s what the surgeon was listening to when he would do the procedures on my head. So I was awake. I have somebody jabbing needles in my head, somebody cutting a tract of hair out of the back of my head. And I’m listening to, like, the most calm voice on the radio talking about disarming a nuclear weapon. And I’m thinking, my god, I’m going through the most pain a human being can tolerate without passing out, and I have this very soothing voice going on behind me. And as he’s listening to this while he’s carving up my head – it was just a bad association.

DAVIES: Well, Joe Buck, it’s been fun. Thanks so much for spending some time with us.

BUCK: Oh man, what a joy. Thanks for having me on.

DAVIES: Joe Buck is a play-by-play announcer for Fox Sports. He’ll be doing the Packers-Cowboy game this Sunday and the Super Bowl on February 5. His new memoir is called “Lucky Bastard.”

Coming up, Ken Tucker reviews the debut country album from Natalie Hemby. This is FRESH AIR.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

FIFA Expands World Cup Format To 48 Teams

FIFA President Gianni Infantino speaks during a press briefing on Tuesday at the governing body’s headquarters in Zurich. Michael Buholzer /AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Michael Buholzer /AFP/Getty Images

In a decade, soccer’s biggest tournament is set to become even bigger.

FIFA, the game’s governing body, unanimously voted to expand the tournament to 48 teams from 32 teams starting in 2026.

The new format starts with the 48 teams playing one another in 16 groups of three. Then, the top two teams from each group will advance into a 32-team group for the knockout stage.

“We are in the 21st century and we have to shape the football World Cup of the 21st century,” said FIFA President Gianni Infantino, who had promised to expand the number of World Cup teams during last year’s election to replace Sepp Blatter.

Of the 211 member associations in FIFA, “135 of them have never played at a World Cup,” according to Reuters.

The change will help develop the game and expand its reach, Infantino said. He added: “Football fever that you have in a country that qualifies for the World Cup is the biggest promotional tool for football that you can have.”

Article continues after sponsorship

The expansion is also a money-maker — “FIFA forecasts the equivalent of $1 billion extra income at current rates from broadcasting and sponsor deals, plus ticket sales,” according to The Associated Press.

And, rebuffing criticism, Infantino said the new format will take place in the same number of days as the previous one, 32, thereby not adding to the time that clubs would need to release players. The tournament will also be played in 12 stadiums, as it is currently.

Some powerful stakeholders remain opposed. The European Club Association said the “regrettable” decision was based on “political reasons rather than sporting ones and under considerable political pressure.”

Critics such as The Independent’s chief sports writer argue that adding more teams will reduce the quality of play. “The prestige attached to World Cup qualification will be watered down at a time when international football is already fighting a losing battle for relevance in the face of the club game,” he writes.

But others say the change presents exciting opportunities, such as ESPN:

“The positives ought to be obvious. You would have far fewer dead rubbers (provided the top seeds play first). You would have another round of knockout games, which tend to be more tense because the stakes are higher. Most of all, you would turn the game’s global showcase into a truly global event, offering a greater shot to countries who would otherwise only watch it on TV.”

As Infantino put it: “Football is more than just Europe and South America. Football is global.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)