Sports

No Image

Big Rule Changes Could Make Youth Football Games A Whole Lot Smaller

USA Football says it will be testing a new version of the game in select youth programs this fall that could become an alternative to tackle football and flag football. Adriana Varela Photography/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Adriana Varela Photography/Getty Images

As concerns over player safety mount, the national governing body for youth and high school football is considering a version of the game that could look radically different from what football fans might expect.

It’s a leaner, less contact-inclined game, focused on fostering well-rounded athletes and cutting down on the kinds of bone-rattling, open-field hits that can leave parents cringing in the bleachers.

It is also, for now, just a glimmer in the eyes of its creators at USA Football: The organization will be introducing new rules in a pilot run at select youth football programs across the country for the fall season.

Here’s a breakdown of what players and parents can expect from the modified game, as told to NPR by USA Football Communications Manager Tom Yelich:

  • A smaller playing field, which dramatically shrinks the 100-yard field to a length of 40 yards. The smaller size allows a typical field to be split in half, so that two separate games can be played on the same surface at once.
  • Fewer players on each side. In a typical game, 11 players for each team would be on the field at once; in the modified version USA Football plans to audition, that number will be reduced to seven — though it hasn’t ruled out the possibility of anywhere from six to nine.
  • There will be no special teams. In other words, that means no special teams in a bid to cut down on the punishing open-field hits those plays often involve.
  • Players at the line of scrimmage cannot use a “three-point stance” — a body position that allows for great leverage and more power off the line.
  • Players must rotate positions, rather than specialize in just one.
  • Coaches must ensure players of equal size are matched up against each other.
Article continues after sponsorship

Yelich bills the modified version of the game as the next step in developing youth football. ESPN, citing 2015 data from the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, reported that about 1.23 million kids ages 6 to 12 played tackle football in 2015; in the same year, about 1.1 million kids in the same age group played flag football, a non-contact version.

For Yelich, the new rules might offer a third way — a bridge between these two ends of the football spectrum.

But he’s also careful to note these rules are still in development, by no means mandatory and currently without plans for a wide rollout. That will depend on how the pilot program goes, Yelich says.

For USA Football, it appears be an attempt to protect its youngest players — who Yelich says can be as young as 7 or 8 — and assuage parental fears about their safety, more and more scientific evidence points toward the lasting health problems incurred while playing the sport.

As NPR’s Shots blog has reported, players are at relatively high risk of concussion in games and, somewhat surprisingly, even more so in practices. Concussions and repeated blows to the head have been linked to chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a degenerative brain disease — a link that the NFL’s top health and safety officer acknowledged at a congressional roundtable last year.

“The earlier they started playing, the worse their brains fared later on,” Robert Stern, director of clinical research at the Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center at the Boston University School of Medicine, told The New York Times.

“To me, it makes sense we would want to do everything we can to reduce or eliminate purposeful hits to the brain,” Stern continued. “But if the culprit is the repetitive hits to the brain, that’s the starting point for making changes.”

The modified game now under consideration would not be the first program instituted by USA Football in an attempt to curb injuries. In 2014, the nonprofit organization launched Heads Up Football, a series of primarily NFL-funded clinics intended to teach players better form in tackling.

That program — which the Times says has been less effective than hoped for — aims to reduce injuries by reforming the players. The new abridged version would aim instead to reduce them by reforming the rulebook instead.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Ping Pong Helps Atlanta Falcons Prepare For New England Patriots

Ahead of this weekend’s Super Bowl, coach Dan Quinn says the Falcons put three ping pong tables in the locker room. One player says it improves hand-eye coordination.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

Good morning. I’m Steve Inskeep. The Atlanta Falcons are ready for the Super Bowl – of Ping-Pong. Coach Dan Quinn says the team put three Ping-Pong tables in the locker room, which helped players to bond. Since they’re heading for the championship, it apparently worked. One player says it improves hand-eye coordination.

RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Oh, man – but I hope he doesn’t miss the game with a Ping-Pong injury. Oh, come on, Rachel. They’re going to be ready to play the New England Patriots. Yeah, as long as the Ping-Pong balls aren’t mysteriously deflated.

INSKEEP: It’s MORNING EDITION.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Roger Federer Takes Home Australian Open Title In Five-Set Classic

Switzerland’s Roger Federer serves against Spain’s Rafael Nadal during the men’s singles final on day 14 of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 29, 2017. Greg Wood/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Greg Wood/AFP/Getty Images

Roger Federer won his 18th Grand Slam title and put some extra distance on the all-time list between himself and Rafael Nadal, the man he beat 6-4, 3-6, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 in a vintage Australian Open final on Sunday night.

It was the 35-year-old Federer’s first major title since Wimbledon in 2012, his first in Australia since 2010, and it reversed the status quo against his nemesis, Nadal.

Both players were returning from extended layoffs — Federer for six months after Wimbledon with an injured left knee; Nadal for a couple of months with an injured left wrist — and were seeded 17th and ninth respectively.

“It’s been a different last six months, I wasn’t sure I was going to make it here but here I am — we made it,” Federer said after accepting the trophy from Australian great Rod Laver, who lends his name to the main stadium at Melbourne Park.

“I would have been happy to lose too, to be honest. The comeback was perfect as it was. Tennis is a tough sport, there’s no draws. If there was going to be one, I would have been happy to have it tonight and share it with Rafa, really.”

Article continues after sponsorship

Federer had lost six of the previous eight Grand Slam finals he’d played against Nadal, and had only previously beaten the left-handed Spaniard in 11 of their 34 matches.

Nadal remains equal second with Pete Sampras on the all-time list, with the last of Nadal’s 14 majors coming at Roland Garros in 2014.

He missed his chance to be the first man in the Open era to win each of the four Grand Slams twice. Instead, Federer became the first man in the Open era to win three Grand Slam titles at least five times (Wimbledon 7 titles, U.S. Open 5, Australian Open 5 and French Open 1).

After four sets where the momentum swung alternately from one player to the next, the fifth had all the tension and drama that these two players are famous for.

Nadal went up an early break and it seemed as if the injury time-out Federer needed after the fourth set may have been an indicator of things to come.
But the Swiss star rallied, and broke back in a pivotal sixth game and took control in a period when he won 10 straight points.

Nadal saved three break points in the eighth game but lost momentum again when Federer finished off a 26-shot rally — the longest of the match — with a forehand winner down the line.

Consecutive forehand errors gave Federer the pivotal break for 5-3, but Nadal made him work for the very last point.

Serving for the match, Federer had to save two break points with an ace and a forehand winner.

At deuce, he was called for a double-fault but challenged the out call on his second serve. The call was overturned, and he got to play two.

Not long after, he fired an ace to get his second match point and hit a forehand crosscourt winner to finish off.

His celebrations were delayed, though, when Nadal challenged the call. Federer watched the replay on the tournament screen, and leaped for joy when it showed his last shot was in. His 100th match at the Australian Open ended with his fifth title at Melbourne Park.

“Congratulation to Roger … Just amazing, the way he’s playing after such a long time of him not being on the tour,” Nadal said. “For sure, you have been working a lot to make that happen. So congratulations.”

Nadal spent two months recovering from a left wrist injury before heading to Brisbane for a warmup tournament, breaking his usual routine. He reached the quarterfinals there, and had no expectations of reaching the final in Australia.

“I had some hard time not being able to compete in full condition. … some injuries, well not new for me, but still tough when it happens,” Nadal said. “I fight a lot these two weeks. Today, a great match, probably Roger deserved it a little bit more than me.”

No two players had met more often in Grand Slam finals in the Open era, and Nadal had previously dominated. But they hadn’t met in a major final since the 2011 French Open, won by Nadal.

Three months ago, they were both on breaks when Federer joined Nadal in Mallorca for the opening of the Spaniard’s tennis academy and the pair joked about ever being able to contend for majors again.

Yet here they were, first Grand Slam tournament of the season, renewing the classic rivalry that saw them dominate tennis a decade ago.

The long-odds final — No. 9 against No. 17 — unfolded after six-time champion Novak Djokovic was shockingly upset by No. 117-ranked Denis Istomin in the second round and top-ranked Andy Murray, a five-time losing finalist in Australia, went out in the fourth round to left-handed serve-volleyer Mischa Zverev.

Federer beat Zverev in the quarterfinals and U.S. Open champion Stan Wawrinka in an all-Swiss semifinal to reach the championship match. The six years between his Australian titles set a record, too, longer than the five years that both Boris Becker and Andre Agassi had between championships in Melbourne.

It capped a remarkable weekend for 30-somethings — all four singles finalists were 30 or older — after Serena Williams beat her sister Venus Williams in the women’s final to capture her Open-era record 23rd Grand Slam title.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

History Made At Australian Open As All Singles Finalists In Their 30s

All four of the women and men who made it to the Australian Open singles finals are in their 30s. Courtney Nguyen writes for the Women’s Tennis Association, explains why older athletes are dominating.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Let’s turn for a few minutes to tennis where history is being made at the Australian Open. All four of the women and men that made it to the singles finals are in their 30s. That’s an age that used to mean retirement was at hand if you were still playing at all, and the finals rekindled two historic rivalries. Early this morning, Venus and Serena Williams faced off in a Grand Slam final for the ninth time in their careers. It was 36-year-old Venus Williams’ first major championship finals appearance since 2009, but it was the younger Williams sister Serena who took the victory and broke records.

At 35 years old, Serena became the oldest woman to win a Grand Slam singles title in the modern era. The win also marked her 23rd Grand Slam title, the most in the modern era. But there’s nothing but love in this rivalry. In her championship acceptance speech, Serena made sure to thank her sister.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

SERENA WILLIAMS: She’s my inspiration. She’s the only reason I’m standing here today and the only reason that the Williams sisters exist, so thank you, Venus, for inspiring me.

(APPLAUSE)

MARTIN: Tomorrow morning, the men’s final. That will bring Roger Federer, who is 35, and Rafael Nadal, who is 30, back together for the – get this – 35th time since 2004.

To talk about all this, we’re joined now by Courtney Nguyen. She’s a senior writer for WTA Insider. That’s a website that covers women’s tennis. She’s with us now via Skype from Melbourne, Australia. Courtney Nguyen, thanks so much for joining us once again.

COURTNEY NGUYEN: Happy to do it.

MARTIN: So, first of all, were any of these four finalists expected to make it this far?

NGUYEN: Well, I think the only one that really was expected and was a pre-tournament favorite was Serena Williams. She was the number-two player in the world. Now she’s the number-one player in the world by winning. But the other three, especially Venus Williams, really were unexpected storylines. Again, with Roger and Rafa turning back the clock – definitely not a final we expected on the men’s side either.

MARTIN: Is this showing at the Australian Open Finals something unique – we’re talking about age here – or are we seeing this elsewhere in professional tennis?

NGUYEN: Well, I think that the sport in general is aging, and it’s the best thing about – that could happen to the sport. You cultivate these stars, and it’s good business to kind of make sure that these stars stay in the game as long as possible. This is a trend that has been happening for a while, particularly spearheaded by Serena.

MARTIN: Is this about older players hanging on longer, being better able to preserve their bodies, you know, for whatever reason getting better training, better guidance about conditioning or is it – is there – are there a lack of younger stars coming up the ranks?

NGUYEN: I think a lot of it is the aspect of endurance. You know, tennis is a sport of teenage prodigies. It’s what we’ve always been used to from the ’70s and ’80s. We haven’t seen that very much in the 2000s, and I think the big reason why is because an 18 year old – it’s tough for them to transition onto the pro tour and really be able to compete physically with the likes of, you know, these strong 30 year olds who get, as you said, the training and the conditioning.

MARTIN: As I mentioned you are in Melbourne covering all this, how are the fans taking all this in? Is this exciting? What are you hearing? What’s the vibe?

NGUYEN: It’s pure excitement. And I think that goes hand-in-hand with the nostalgia and the wistfulness of it all. I mean, these are four champions in Federer, Nadal and Serena and Venus who just have so much history down here in Australia, have so much history in the game. And this is a sport where we like to see our champions as much as we love to see that break-out ingenue start, you know, come through and make a name for themselves. These four names in particular are the ones that really tug at the heartstrings of tennis fans.

MARTIN: That was Courtney Nguyen. She’s a senior writer at WTA Insider. She joined us via Skype from Melbourne where she is doing hard duty covering the Australian Open. Courtney, thanks so much for joining us.

NGUYEN: Always a pleasure.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Nadal Books Date With Federer For Australian Open Title

Rafael Nadal throws his towel to a ball boy during his semifinal against Bulgaria’s Grigor Dimitrov at the Australian Open. Kin Cheung/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Kin Cheung/AP

Rafael Nadal has reached the final of the Australian Open, where he will face longtime rival Roger Federer in a matchup that answers the prayers of tennis fans eager to see a ninth Grand Slam final between the pair. Nadal outlasted Grigor Dimitrov in a nearly five-hour match Friday.

“For me, it’s a privilege” to face Federer again, Nadal said after his semifinal.

By reviving a rivalry that began in earnest when they slugged it out in the 2006 French Open, Nadal and Federer, now 30 and 35, respectively, provide a bookend to the women’s bracket, where Venus and Serena Williams will play in the Australian Open’s final for the first time since 2003.

The ninth-seeded Nadal needed a gritty win over No. 15 seed Dimitrov to reach the final, winning 6-3, 5-7, 7(7)-6(5), 6(4)-7(7), 6-4. Nadal had been poised to win in four sets — but Dimitrov used his mobility and a booming serve to prolong the match at Melbourne’s Rod Laver Arena, and his creativity and lashing backhand gave Nadal fits.

Nadal was on the losing end of two key challenges late in the match, as in the final sets, two of Dimitrov’s angled shots — one on either sideline — were shown to have caught a sliver of the line.

Article continues after sponsorship

Fate seemed to turn against Nadal in the final set, as Dimitrov held serve by using a no-look over-the-head cross-court shot (after losing his footing near the net) to set up a baseline winner that Nadal couldn’t reach. But after both players held serve through the set’s first eight games, Nadal finally broke through to go up 5-4.

One day earlier, Federer had booked his spot in the title match with his own five-set victory over Stan Wawrinka.

On Sunday, Nadal will appear in his first Grand Slam final since the 2014 French Open — and Federer will be trying to break a drought of his own: He hasn’t won a Grand Slam since Wimbledon in 2012.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

14 Years Later, Venus And Serena Williams Meet Again In Australian Open Final

Venus Williams, 36, will face off against her sister Serena, 35, in Saturday’s Australian Open final. Williams beat fellow American Coco Vandeweghe Thursday to reach the finals. Dita Alangkara/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Dita Alangkara/AP

It’s been 14 years since the Williams sisters last played for the Australian Open title — but they’ll do it again on Saturday, in a final that showcases two of the most successful careers in tennis. At 36, Venus Williams is the oldest Grand Slam finalist since Martina Navratilova’s run to the Wimbledon final in 1994.

For now at least, the Australian Open’s final bracket is strictly for the over-30 club. On the men’s side, Roger Federer reached Sunday’s final with a five-set victory over Stan Wawrinka. At age 35, he’ll face either Rafael Nadal or Grigor Dimitrov, who play on Friday.

The women’s final “won’t be an easy match. I know that it won’t be easy,” Venus said after earning her spot. “You have to control yourself, then you also have to hopefully put your opponent in a box. This opponent is your sister, and she’s super awesome.”

Her sister Serena is indeed super awesome. At age 35, she’s the second-ranked player in the world and will play in her eighth Australian Open final after beating Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in just 50 minutes. World No. 1 Angelique Kerber didn’t reach the semifinals after losing to American CoCo Vandeweghe — who fell to Venus Williams in three sets Thursday.

Article continues after sponsorship

With a combined age of 71 and the experience of decades of elite tennis, both of the Williams sisters are motivated to win this final. Their only other meeting for the Australian Open title came back in 2003, when Serena won.

For Venus, the match is her first Grand Slam singles final since Wimbledon in 2009. And while she has seven Grand Slam singles titles in her career, she’s never won the Australian Open.

For Serena, the final brings a chance to break the tie for most Grand Slam titles — 22 — that she currently shares with Steffi Graf. The mark is a record in the Open era.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Aging Giants Of Tennis Reach Australian Open Semi-Finals

NPR’s Ari Shapiro speaks with Sports Illustrated senior writer Jon Wertheim about the performances of Roger Federer and Venus Williams at the Australian Open.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

What’s old is new again in tennis. We’ve reached the semifinals of the Australian Open, and some of the sport’s aging giants are still in the running. Venus Williams, 36 years old, is playing through an autoimmune disorder that causes fatigue. Her sister, Serena, is still alive in this tournament, too. And on the men’s side, both Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal are through to the semis. Fans are crossing their fingers for a throwback final.

Jon Wertheim is a senior writer with Sports Illustrated and has been watching the first Open tennis season in person. Hi there.

JON WERTHEIM: Hi, Ari.

SHAPIRO: In your coverage, you noted that the Williams sisters combined age is 71. Serena’s been dominant in recent years. Venus has been struggling. How has she looked so far this tournament?

WERTHEIM: Venus has looked fantastic. The benefit for these major events, these Grand Slams is that you have a day off in between. You referenced the autoimmune disorder, and I think the fact that Venus has a day in between her matches has been a big benefit. It also hasn’t been oppressively hot here the way it has in past years. But this – I mean it’s just extraordinary. Six of the 8 players remaining as we speak are 30 or over.

SHAPIRO: What do you attribute that to?

WERTHEIM: The game has become so physical that I think durability and strength are absolutely essential. I mean the days of sort of the waifish teenage burnout candidate are laughably obsolete. I think these are pros’ pros. These are professionals. They have nutritionists. They have teams.

And I also think these are just extraordinarily good tennis players. I mean Roger Federer could be, you know, 50 years old and still have terrific tennis talent and hand-eye coordination. I mean I think, especially in the case of Federer, Nadal and the Williams sisters, these are just extraordinary, extraordinary athletes.

SHAPIRO: So I’m trying to figure out whether we’re looking at one of the greatest generations of tennis players of all time or a tennis game where now, for some reason, people in their 30s have the advantage over people in their 20s.

WERTHEIM: Why choose?

SHAPIRO: (Laughter).

WERTHEIM: I think it’s a little bit of both. I mean I think that, you know, we’re going to be telling our grandkids about the Williams sisters, Federer and Nadal. I also think this is ultimately to tennis’s virtue. I mean sports – we all like young and fresh and the new flavors.

But I think it also speaks really well of tennis that these careers now can span – you know, in Serena’s case, she won her first major when Bill Clinton was president. We were joking. She’s going for her Grand Slam title under her fourth different president. And you know, two of them in the middle had two terms. So I think it’s great for tennis that these career shelf lives are so long now.

SHAPIRO: What do you think the chances are that we will see a throwback final between the Williams sisters on the women’s side and between Federer and Nadal on the men’s side?

WERTHEIM: I think in the case of the Williams sisters, the odds are pretty good. Both of them are playing opponents that are ranked lower than they are. I think we’ve still got a ways to go on the men’s side – especially Federer plays Stan Wawrinka, (unintelligible), fellow Swiss player who’s won three major titles of his own. It’s a little bit I think hard overhead. I mean I think from a sentimental standpoint, we would all love to see both of those finals.

SHAPIRO: We, the older generation of tennis watchers (laughter).

WERTHEIM: Yeah, I was going to say. We don’t root in the press box. We say this not out of partiality but simply rooting for the story. But no, I mean I think that it would be great for this event and great for tennis, but I don’t want to diminish the other players remaining.

SHAPIRO: That’s Jon Wertheim, senior writer for Sports Illustrated, speaking with us from Melbourne, Australia. Thanks so much.

WERTHEIM: Thanks, Ari.

(SOUNDBITE OF SHANNON AND THE CLAMS SONG, “OH LOUIE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

NASCAR Implements New Point System To Change How Fans Watch Sport

NASCAR is reinventing itself — again. A new point system may or may not draw new fans to the sport, but it will change how people watch. NPR’s Robert Siegel talks to Scott Fowler, sports columnist for the Charlotte Observer, about the new changes.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

NASCAR’s latest revamping may or may not bring in more fans, but it will change how stock car racing fans watch. Races used to be one long event – 500 miles or so. You earned points. The higher you finished, the more points you won. And the top 16 point earners at the end of the season moved on to the post-season.

Well, now each race will have three stages. Essentially fans will have three races in one to enjoy, and drivers will have more opportunities to earn points. But will everyone enjoy the new system? Well, for that, we turn to Scott Fowler, sports columnist for the Charlotte Observer. Welcome to the program.

SCOTT FOWLER: Thank you very much. I’m a big fan.

SIEGEL: Why is NASCAR doing this?

FOWLER: NASCAR needs a boost. NASCAR was a very hot sport, Robert, in – 20 years ago, even 10 years ago. Now stadiums are half empty. Millennials don’t want to sit around and watch a four-hour race. They’re a little bit desperate here, but ultimately I think it’s a smart move. They are trying to give you more of a reason to watch for a longer period of time.

SIEGEL: And the period of time at issue is really, say, the first hour of the race when now it’s consequential. Somebody could earn some points by winning.

FOWLER: Exactly. There’s something around here we call a NASCAR nap, which is what you could take after the start of a race for about three hours until the end of the race when all – everything was decided in the last 20 laps or so. Other than crashes or something, there wasn’t a lot going on.

These races are long. The shortest ones usually are 400 miles. So think of driving, say, from Washington to New York and back. That’s 400 miles. That’s how long the shortest ones of these races are. So it’s a long time to make people pay attention. And you know how attention spans are these days.

SIEGEL: Well, are the breaks after the first third and the second third of the race – are these going to be like periods in a basketball game or a hockey game? That is, will it stop and break for commercials and interview people?

FOWLER: Yes. It will be kind of pre-determined breaks much like almost two halftimes I guess you could say. They’re shorter, but that will be the time where fans will naturally go to the refrigerator. Or if they’re in the stands, hopefully they’re going to go and buy some more concessions. I’m sure the track operators would like that.

SIEGEL: The first race of the season, the Daytona 500, is barely a month away. It doesn’t seem like a lot of time for drivers and their teams to adjust to what sounds like a pretty radical change. Isn’t that rather fast?

FOWLER: I think that’s a fair statement, yeah. I think people who are doing this right now just went from taking algebra two to taking a graduate-level calculus class. I really think there’s a lot of permutations that not everyone has thought of yet that will only become apparent when it happens.

But that’s kind of exciting, and NASCAR, like I was mentioning, needs a jolt of excitement. Everyone knows what it’s like to go in a car and punch an accelerator and go fast and that thrill. And they’re trying to get back to that a little bit more opportunistically I suppose in this digital age where they really have to capture people’s attention.

The other thing I should point out – one thing this sport doesn’t have – and this will not change. There is no Dale Earnhardt Sr. coming back into the fore. I mean he was this sport’s absolute superstar – died in 2001 in a last-lap crash at the Daytona 500. And in some ways, things have not been quite the same since. His son is a very popular racer in NASCAR but has not had the same level of success. And this sport is looking for that as well. It needs another superstar.

SIEGEL: That’s Scott Fowler, sports columnist for the Charlotte Observer. Thanks for talking with us.

FOWLER: Thank you very much.

(SOUNDBITE OF THE LEISURE SOCIETY SONG, “JUST LIKE THE KNIFE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Atlanta Falcons, New England Patriots To Meet On Super Bowl Sunday

Atlanta quarterback Matt Ryan tumbled into the end zone, slammed the ball to the turf with a thunderous spike, and let out a scream that showed just how much he wanted this game. He wants the next one even more.

With another MVP-worthy performance and plenty of help from Julio Jones, Matty Ice guided the Atlanta Falcons to a 44-21 rout of the Green Bay Packers for the NFC championship Sunday, a showing that erased any doubts about whether Ryan can win the big games.

In his ninth season, he’s finally headed to his first Super Bowl.

“We’ll enjoy it because it’s hard to get to this point. I know that from experience,” Ryan said. “But our ultimate goal is still in front of us.”

The Falcons (13-5) will face Tom Brady and the Patriots on Feb. 5 in Houston, just the second Super Bowl appearance in Atlanta’s 51-year history. Eighteen years ago, they lost to Denver in John Elway’s final game.

Ryan threw for 392 yards and four touchdowns, but it was his 14-yard scoring run — his first TD on the ground since 2012 — that really set the tone .

Jones was right in the middle of things, too. After barely practicing during the week because of a lingering toe injury, he finished off the Packers with a 73-yard catch-and-run on Atlanta’s second snap of the second half, pushing the lead to 31-0 and essentially turning the rest of the Georgia Dome finale into one long celebration.

Article continues after sponsorship

“He’s a beast,” Ryan said. “I’ve been lucky to play with him as long as I have. He was impressive today. I know he wasn’t feeling his best, but he’s a warrior.”

Jones finished with nine catches for 180 yards and two scores, which included a toe-dragging catch for a 5-yard touchdown with 3 seconds left in the first half, sending the Falcons to the locker room up 24-0.

Ryan sparked more delirious chants of “MVP! MVP! MVP!” as he carved up an injury-plagued Packers secondary that had no way of stopping a team that averaged nearly 34 points a game during the regular season and romped to a 36-20 victory against Seattle’s Legion of Boom last week.

The Packers, riding an eight-game winning streak and coming off a thrilling upset of the top-seeded Dallas Cowboys , got a taste of what they’d be in for on Atlanta’s very first possession. Driving 80 yards in 13 plays, the Falcons converted three third downs, the last when Ryan scrambled away from pressure and flipped a shovel pass to Mohamed Sanu for a 2-yard score.

Tom Brady’s redemption tour is headed to the Super Bowl.

After beginning the 2016 season suspended for four games for his role in the “Deflategate” scandal, the New England quarterback relentlessly carried the Patriots to an unprecedented ninth appearance in the title game, and his seventh.

Brady threw for a franchise playoff-best 384 yards and three touchdowns in a 36-17 rout of the helpless Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday in New England’s sixth consecutive AFC championship game.

The Patriots, who have won nine in a row, are early 3-point favorites heading to face Atlanta in two weeks in Houston, seeking their fifth NFL title with Brady at quarterback and Bill Belichick as coach. Belichick’s seventh appearance in a Super Bowl will be a record for a head coach.

Brady was banned by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell when New England (16-2) went 3-1 to open the schedule.

Since his return in Week 5, the only defeat came at home to Seattle, and Brady, 39, had one of the best seasons of a Hall of Fame-caliber career.

Brady’s main weapon was Chris Hogan. The previously unheralded receiver found open spaces everywhere on the field against a leaky secondary. Hogan caught nine balls for 180 yards and two scores.

“It’s been a long journey, but I’ve worked really hard to get to this point,” said the product of Monmouth – yes, Monmouth. “I couldn’t be happier to get to be a part of this thing, this team – this whole thing.”

Top wideout Julian Edelman added eight receptions for 118 yards and a touchdown as Brady tied Joe Montana’s playoff record with nine three-TD passing performances. Brady also had his 11th 300-yard postseason game, extending his NFL record, completing 32 of 42 throws.

“We won a lot of different ways under a lot of different circumstances,” Brady said. “Mental toughness is what it is all about and this team has got it. We’ll see if we can write the perfect ending.”

The ending for Pittsburgh (13-6) was anything but perfect. It lost star running back Le’Veon Bell late in the first quarter to a groin injury.

That didn’t seem to matter much in a record 16th conference title match for the Steelers, who made mistakes in every facet of Sunday’s game. The 19-point loss ended their nine-game winning streak.

The franchise that has won the most Super Bowls, six, and the most postseason games, 36, never seemed likely to challenge in the misty rain.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Saturday Sports: Golf, Politics And The Presidency

Golf will return as the prominent presidential sport. And football legend and African-American icon Jim Brown shocked the political sports community by supporting Donald Trump.

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Administrations come and go, but now it’s time for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SIMON: President Trump is a golfer, so was President Obama, who was mostly a devoted basketball player. Does sports get politicized this year, too? NPR’s sports correspondent Tom Goldman joins us.

Tom, thanks so much for being with us.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: My pleasure, Scott.

SIMON: There’s been a fair amount of division in American sport over President Trump, hasn’t there? Ranging in LeBron James, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, on the one hand…

GOLDMAN: Right.

SIMON: …And then – let me get you to talk about Jim Brown, interesting figure now.

GOLDMAN: Very interesting case. You know, considered the greatest running back in NFL history, known for his activism when he joined other prominent African-American athletes like Muhammad Ali and Bill Russell and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar as you mentioned, all speaking out during the civil rights movement. But, you know, Brown’s form of activism was always different. He was more about practicality than protest. And it led to his controversial criticism of civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and more recently Congressman John Lewis.

Journalist Dave Zirin wrote this week about spending time with Brown a couple of years ago and learning more about Brown’s attitudes, which focused on building an economic base in African-American communities – business ownership, entrepreneurship as a way to resist racism. And Brown has spent many years doing kind of roll-your-sleeves-up work in those communities. And this apparently is what he believes the new president will encourage after having a recent meeting with Trump.

SIMON: And he’s going to be talking about it, I gather, this week at a forum with a lot of other interesting people.

GOLDMAN: Yeah, yeah. He’s scheduled to take part in an event at San Jose State University. It’s a gathering to discuss athlete activism. And there will be, you know, traditional liberal voices from men like Dr. Harry Edwards and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. And it’ll be interesting to hear what comes out of it, perhaps some constructive dialogue that could be applied outside the world of sports.

SIMON: Tom, I got to tell you, I was at the White House this week with the Chicago Cubs.

GOLDMAN: Lucky guy.

SIMON: And – yes, indeed. And I – President Obama said something, in what might be the last remarks of his administration, I want to note. The president said – the last official remarks of his administration, he said, quote, “sometimes people wonder, well, why are you spending time on sports? There’s other stuff going on throughout our history. Sports has had this power to bring us together even when the country is divided. Sports has changed attitudes and culture in ways that seem subtle but that ultimately made us think differently about ourselves and who we were.” The president said, there’s a direct line between Jackie Robinson and me standing here. There’s a direct line between people loving Ernie Banks and then the city being able to come together and work together in one spirit.

GOLDMAN: That’s nice…

SIMON: I told – I told his speech writers, the best presidential address I’ve heard since Gettysburg.

GOLDMAN: (Laughter) And I understand, like a great basketball move by the president, it was improvised.

SIMON: It was improvised indeed, yeah. The speechwriter told that to us. We got to talk about the NFL this weekend, Steelers versus Patriots, Green Bay versus the Falcons. A lot of people would love to see Brady and Rodgers – versus Rodgers in the Super Bowl.

GOLDMAN: Yeah. Well, that may very well happen. I think Brady’s a pretty strong bet, you know, hard to imagine Pittsburgh coming into Foxborough, Mass., and beating New England on its home field. Pittsburgh’s running back Le’Veon Bell has been the strength of the Pittsburgh offense. But he’s going up against an amazing and kind of unheralded run defense of the Patriots. Atlanta-Green Bay – man, we’ve got visions of both teams scoring in the 40s or 50s. That’s going to be a really exciting game, hard to call. And, you know what? We’re out of time, so I don’t have to.

SIMON: (Laughter) Way to vamp. NPR’s Tom Goldman, working the clock. Thanks very much, my friend.

GOLDMAN: (Laughter) You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)