Business

No Image

'Washington Post' Sports Reporter Will Cover The 2020 Presidential Campaign

Washington Post reporter Chelsea Janes is switching from the Washington Nationals beat to the 2020 presidential campaign and discusses the differences and similarities of covering politics and sports.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

Back on Election Day last month, Washington Post reporter Chelsea Janes had a big scoop. Now, if you’re thinking, Election Day – must be politics – think again. Janes covers baseball for the Post. And her scoop was that the Washington Nationals had just offered right-fielder Bryce Harper the biggest free-agent contract in U.S. sports history.

Janes has been all over breaking news on the Nats for four years now, which is why it caught our eye when we spotted a press release announcing she is about to switch beats to cover the 2020 presidential campaign. Chelsea Janes joins us now in our studio. Welcome.

CHELSEA JANES: Thank you for having me.

KELLY: So baseball to a presidential election – how did this come about?

JANES: (Laughter) You know, every four or five years or so they try to rotate the baseball reporters off that beat. It’s pretty grueling, as I’m sure a presidential campaign is too. But…

KELLY: I was going to say.

JANES: Yeah, (laughter) right.

KELLY: I’m not sure it’s going to be (laughter) – it’s going to get easier.

JANES: So I kind of knew my time was up. That was my fourth year. And as we started talking about what was next, they kind of said, well, how about Iowa in 2019? And I laughed it off. And eventually, it sort of started, well, actually, that would be really neat. And they were open to it, they being the head editors. And I was open to it. Just kind of felt like a no-brainer.

KELLY: Had you closely tracked politics up till that moment?

JANES: I would say I was one of the people – I think there are many – who really, you know, followed but really kind of got sucked in a couple years ago when the whole country kind of got sucked in a little bit more. And…

KELLY: It’s been hard not to be following politics closely.

JANES: Yeah, exactly.

KELLY: Yeah.

JANES: Exactly. And I think, you know, being so close to everything that’s happening in Washington and being at the Washington Post as that was happening, it was like, wow, I’m feet away from sort of being in on this period in history that I’m sure people will never forget. So you know, I figured if journalism is the first draft of history, I want to write part of it. You know, I want to be there for it. So it was an unbelievable opportunity that they were willing to even let me think about it.

KELLY: Part of what you’ll bring to it that somebody who’s been doing this for 20, 30 years can’t is a totally fresh eye. I mean, you weren’t working this beat in 2016, 2017.

JANES: Yeah. It’s really interesting. As they sort of presented this to me as an option, I think one of the things that’s very evident as I’ve talked to people is how much they thought they knew during 2016 and how little they really knew. So you know, a couple people have said to me, we need someone who can ask the dumb questions. And I was like, I can do that. That’s something I am capable of.

KELLY: (Laughter).

JANES: But yeah, I think they – there’s a sense that the rules have changed. And hopefully, you know, maybe I’ll notice something that someone who’s kind of in the weeds with it all doesn’t, or I can supplement in that way. So I at least hope that’ll be an advantage.

KELLY: Talk to me about some of the skills that you learned covering the baseball beat that will translate. You mentioned Iowa.

JANES: (Laughter).

KELLY: So I’m guessing a fondness for long bus rides and bad motels along the way might come in handy.

JANES: (Laughter) Yeah. Yeah, I think the travel logistics is a big part of it, that, you know, my stamina is very high. I’ve basically lived out of suitcases for five years, so I – I’m used to it. And, you know, that’s a big part of the campaign trail, from what I’ve heard. And having not been there, I can’t say.

But, you know, there’s a lot of sort of incremental updates. There’s a lot of noticing small changes in what people say and figuring out why. And I think that’s similar to baseball. It’s like, you might – you know, someone who’s just kind of dropping in might not see why this day or change is important, but it is important in presenting that day to day.

KELLY: What will you miss about covering baseball?

JANES: I love baseball, so even just kind of being at the park. It’s something I grew up with. I played softball in college. It’s brought me a lot of my closest friends. I’ll miss that part of it. I’ll miss the people. You spend – you know, as I’m sure you do in the politics realm – a lot of time with people that you cover and that you cover people with.

But, you know, I won’t miss rain delays, and I won’t miss writing about little injuries (laughter) while the world is burning. You know, you kind of sit there and think, what am I writing about a hamstring for?

KELLY: It’ll be awfully nice, though, to get to show up at one of those first spring games and think, I can just watch this.

JANES: (Laughter) Yeah.

KELLY: I don’t have to file a single line of copy about it.

JANES: Exactly. It’ll be nice – and leave when I want. (Laughter) Yeah.

KELLY: Well, Chelsea Janes, we wish you luck.

JANES: Thank you. I appreciate it.

KELLY: That’s Chelsea Janes. She wraps up four years covering baseball on the sports desk of the Washington Post in January in order to dig in covering politics and the 2020 presidential campaign.

(SOUNDBITE OF QUANTIC’S “PAINTING SILHOUETTES”)

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Legalizing Hemp Will Likely Shake Up The Market

The 2018 farm bill legalized industrial hemp, after decades of restrictions. Hemp looks like marijuana, it smells like marijuana, but it’s not marijuana. Hemp growers are now anticipating a boom.



ESTHER HONIG, BYLINE: The 2018 Farm Bill legalized industrial hemp after decades of restrictions. Hemp looks like marijuana and smells like marijuana. But it’s not marijuana. Esther Honig of Harvest Public Media reports that hemp growers are now anticipating a boom.

HONIG: Farmers can already grow hemp in more than half the country. States like Colorado where Kristen Kunau grows it with her husband. Come December, most of what’s left of her crop sits in her fridge. She pulls out a mason jar of thick dark syrup. Does that smell more hemp-like or?

KRISTEN KUNAU: Kind of. Kind of sweet.

HONIG: Yeah. But still a little – it smells like…

KUNAU: Cannabis.

HONIG: …Marijuana.

KUNAU: Yeah.

HONIG: I’m always…

KUNAU: It is cannabis.

HONIG: This is CBD or cannabidiol. An oil made from hemp flowers. Unlike marijuana, there’s hardly any THC. So it won’t get you high. It’s increasingly popular for its purported health benefits.

KUNAU: I gave it to my kids. I put it on my face, burns, cuts. We’ve had so many different people tell us how much it’s helped them.

HONIG: CBD is driving the hemp market, which was once a common crop in the U.S. until lumped together with marijuana and banned in 1937. Then in 2014, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for hemp to be grown again as part of state-run research programs. This year, he pushed to remove hemp as a controlled substance.

KUNAU: With the Farm Bill passing and everything, we’re going to be doing more full time.

HONIG: Like many of today’s hemp farmers, the Kunaus have a small operation, just one acre. They also work day jobs. But with the law change, they can finally access bank accounts and low interest federal loans even to be eligible for crop insurance. It all comes at a time when the market for hemp CBD is booming.

JAMIE SCHAU: It’s extremely versatile. It can be used for a whole host of different applications.

HONIG: That’s Jamie Schau with Brightfield Group, a market research company. She says CBD is used in everything from lotions to sports drinks, even dog treats.

SCHAU: It has treatments for everything from epilepsy to MS to arthritis to anxiety, depression, insomnia. The list goes on and on and on.

ESTHER BLESSING: We don’t know that. We don’t have the clinical trial evidence to support that.

HONIG: Esther Blessing teaches psychiatry at NYU and is studying the effects of CBD on people with PTSD and alcohol abuse. The FDA recently approved CBD in a drug that treats a form of epilepsy but that’s it. She says all the hype around CBD is getting ahead of the research.

BLESSING: But on the other hand, as a scientist, I really feel like it is one of the most promising medications that has come along in the last 50 years.

HONIG: Meanwhile, hemp growers like the Kunaus are bracing for change. The price for a pound of hemp flowers reached $75. But with legalization, that’s likely to drop.

KUNAU: I do know everybody’s going to be wanting to grow hemp and CBD. And this one acre is going to seem like nothing compared to people doing 10s and 30 or 50.

HONIG: As more hemp is planted in the country, she hopes falling prices don’t squeeze out small farmers. For NPR News, I’m Esther Honig.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

That story comes to us from Harvest Public Media, a reporting collaboration focusing on agriculture and rural issues.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Dow Suffers Record-Breaking Christmas Eve Losses

The exterior of the New York Stock Exchange photographed last week. On Monday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its worst Christmas Eve performance since 1918.

Patrick Sison/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Patrick Sison/AP

The stock market was only open for half a day Monday, and that was more than enough time for the Dow Jones Industrial Average to drop 2.9 percent to 21,792.20. That was its worst Christmas Eve performance since 1918.

Other U.S. indexes fell too. The Nasdaq lost 2.2 percent to 6,192.92. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 2.7 percent to 2,351.10.

U.S. stocks are on track for their worst year since 2008, which was during the Great Recession, and their worst December since 1931, which was during the Great Depression.

The markets have been dealing with concerns of a slowing global economy, the trade dispute with China and last week’s interest rate increase — the fourth by the Federal Reserve this year.

Over the weekend, reports surfaced that President Trump was asking advisers if he could legally fire Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump nominated Powell last year to take over the Fed, but since interest rates began rising, Trump has upped his rhetoric against Powell.

Efforts by Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin on Sunday to reassure investors backfired. He tweeted that he had spoken with the heads of the nation’s six largest banks and was assured that they had sufficient lending capacity.

Today I convened individual calls with the CEOs of the nation’s six largest banks. See attached statement. pic.twitter.com/YzuSamMyeT

— Steven Mnuchin (@stevenmnuchin1) December 23, 2018

“We’ve gone through situations before where it’s absolutely normal for the secretary of Treasury to reach out to the private sector,” Quincy Krosby, a chief market strategist at Prudential Financial, told The Wall Street Journal.

“But what’s bad is this made the papers, and says the government is very worried,” Krosby told the paper, adding that with investors focused on so many issues, “it’s almost as if gravity is pulling this market toward a lower level before it bottoms out.”

Monday morning’s drop in U.S. financial markets began after Trump tweeted about the Fed.

The only problem our economy has is the Fed. They don’t have a feel for the Market, they don’t understand necessary Trade Wars or Strong Dollars or even Democrat Shutdowns over Borders. The Fed is like a powerful golfer who can’t score because he has no touch – he can’t putt!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 24, 2018

“The only problem our economy has is the Fed,” the president said on Twitter. “They don’t have a feel for the Market, they don’t understand necessary Trade Wars or Strong Dollars or even Democrat Shutdowns over Borders. The Fed is like a powerful golfer who can’t score because he has no touch – he can’t putt!”

The Fed is an independent agency. While board members are nominated by the president, they make decisions separately of the White House.

Peter Conti-Brown, a financial historian at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, told The Associated Press: “We’ve never seen anything like this full-blown and full-frontal assault. This is a disaster for the Fed, a disaster for the president and a disaster for the economy.”

After Monday’s Wall Street losses, Asian markets followed. In early trading, Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell by 5.1 percent to 19,147.45 points. The Shanghai Composite Index lost 2.1 percent to 2,473.75. Benchmarks in Thailand and Taiwan also declined.

Markets in Hong Kong, Australia and South Korea were closed for Christmas.

After a pause in trading for the holiday, U.S. markets reopen Wednesday.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Zoox Inc. Snags First California Permit To Transport Passengers In Self-Driving Cars

Bay Area-based Zoox Inc has received approval from California to transport passengers in its autonomous vehicles. It’s the first permit handed out by the state as part of a pilot program for self-driving cars.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Self-driving cars, once a futuristic projection, have already become old news in California. More than 60 companies currently hold permits to test autonomous vehicles, according to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.

But on Friday, California passed a new milestone when it allowed one self-driving car startup, Zoox Inc., to transport passengers for the first time.

Zoox received its permit under a pilot program launched in April by the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC.

“This is a really, really significant milestone as we head towards commercial launch, which we have stated is toward the end of 2020,” Bert Kaufman, head of corporate and regulatory affairs at Zoox, told Reuters.

There are a few catches. Zoox can’t charge for the trips, and each autonomous vehicle, or AV, has to have a certified backup driver.

A sister program launched by the commission will eventually allow self-driving cars in California to transport passengers without a backup driver. For now, Zoox is the only company operating under either program.

Self-driving cars could disrupt entire sectors of the economy, according to Sam Schwartz, the former New York City traffic commissioner and author of the book “No One At The Wheel: Driverless Cars and the Road of the Future.”

“I think everybody is expecting fewer drivers, and that’s no surprise,” Schwartz told NPR’s Terry Gross in a recent interview. “But it also means that there are probably going to be fewer repair shops. … AVs lend themselves to fleet operations, especially if they’re going to be offering rides, as opposed to selling maximum vehicles, so car dealerships may disappear.”

He suggested that trucking companies could lose business, but the advertising industry might thrive as riders are increasingly freed up to divert attention from the road to their smart devices.

Meanwhile, critics have raised practical and ethical concerns about the dangers posed by self-driving cars. Earlier this year, a self-driving test vehicle from Uber Technologies struck and killed a woman in Tempe, Ariz. That incident prompted Arizona’s Republican governor, Doug Ducey, to suspend Uber’s test drives.

Some researchers argue that autonomous vehicles can be trained to be safer than human drivers. Other experts say the limited data available from self-driving cars hampers any attempts at comparison.

Either way, self-driving cars are already a growing presence on public roads. The Global Atlas of Autonomous Vehicles in Cities is tracking at least 80 cities that are piloting autonomous vehicles, or are planning to test them. These fleets of vehicles are collecting data and navigating the practical problems of driving in cities. A video from Zoox shows one of its cars surpassing a parked vehicle on a narrow San Francisco street.

Double-parked vehicles (DPVs) are everywhere in San Francisco; classifying and successfully navigating around them in realtime can be a challenge for autonomous vehicles. Check out how Zoox handles them in these examples: pic.twitter.com/iOfCytBeKv

— Zoox (@zoox) December 22, 2018

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has primarily dominated the self-driving vehicle market, as Reuters reports. The California DMV gave Alphabet’s autonomous vehicle branch, Waymo, a permit to begin driverless testing on public roads in October, according to the company.

Waymo also launched a passenger service in Phoenix earlier this month. The service, Waymo One, charges its customers for fully automated rides. In some cases, the company’s cars are already operating without a backup driver.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Working The Holidays As An Amazon Worker

NPR’s Michel Martin talks to Vox business reporter Chavie Lieber about what it’s like to work in an Amazon warehouse during the holidays.



MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

It’s just a couple of more days until Christmas. And if you are like other last-minute shoppers, you may be wondering how on earth you’re going to get those last gifts on time. And if you just cannot stand the thought of a crowded shopping mall – and, frankly, even if you can – you’re probably thinking about turning to Amazon. Amazon is now the 800-pound gorilla of e-commerce, accounting for some 60 percent of purchases on Black Friday, according to the web traffic analyst Hitwise. And, yes, it is an NPR sponsor.

But we were wondering what it’s like to work at an Amazon warehouse during the holidays, so we called Chavie Lieber. She’s written extensively about working conditions at Amazon for Vox, and she’s with us now. Chavie, thanks so much for joining us.

CHAVIE LIEBER: Hi. Thanks for having me. Great to be here.

MARTIN: How much does the workload increase at Amazon during what they call peak, between Thanksgiving and just after Christmas? Can you give us a sense of that? And tell us – as we said, you have sources who speak to you usually without attribution. But what are they telling you about what that’s like?

LIEBER: A lot of the Amazon warehouse workers that reached out to me, they all say that they are grateful for the job. They want the job. It’s really just that it is high-intensity. It is so aggressive. All Amazon warehouses abide by this number called a packing quota. And basically, what that means is every Amazon warehouse worker has a number of boxes that they have to pack per hour. And during the holiday season, when the orders are kind of running in, the managers are trying to get the warehouse workers to pack faster and faster.

So, you know, the average can be, let’s say, 240. But then, during the holiday season, the number of boxes you have to pack per hour can go as high as 400. And basically, if you are slowing down, you’re not keeping up or your productivity levels aren’t as high, workers can get write-ups, and they can also be terminated.

So it just seems like, you know, working under these type of conditions is pretty demeaning. And some employees that I’ve talked to have said, you know, by the end of the holiday season, a lot of people just feel like they can’t make it.

MARTIN: Well, first of all, why do you say it’s demeaning? I mean, I can see that it’s demanding. But why do you say it’s demeaning? Do they say it’s demeaning?

LIEBER: Yeah. Yeah. The line that a lot of people say to me when they talk about, you know, people that are protesting and they’re rallying against Amazon, they want Jeff Bezos and they want Amazon to know that we are not robots.

And basically, it’s this idea that, you know, they want to do the work load. And they want to pack for Amazon. And they want to do this job. But they don’t want to work in this type of environment. And basically, Amazon has this really codified system where it’s not like you can talk to a manager and explain, you know, I’m not feeling well this day or I’m doing this. Like, you know, people describe it as like a well-oiled machine.

MARTIN: So I was going to ask you about that. Are there rules about breaks – how long, how often people are allowed to have them?

LIEBER: I will tell you what I know about people that are working there full-time, which is, according to federal law, you need to have breaks. And Amazon’s break system is two 15-minute breaks and then a half-hour lunch break. And, you know, some of the complaints that Amazon workers have told me is that these breaks are definitely not enough, especially if some – you know, some of the Amazon warehouse workers in Minneapolis are protesting because a lot of them are Muslim. And they don’t have enough breaks to, you know, eat, drink, get water, go to the bathroom, grab lunch and then also abide by their praying schedule.

So even though, you know, the 30-minute break and then the 15 – and the 15-minute break add up to an hour, which I guess is pretty typical in a lot of workplaces where people are given an hour lunch break, it’s extremely rigid. And if you go over your break time, like, you can get penalized.

MARTIN: What about overtime? Are people expected to work overtime? Are they required to work overtime during peak?

LIEBER: Yeah. During peak season, according to my understanding, overtime is mandatory. Some of the people have told me that their schedules are something like four days a week, 12-hour shifts. And if you try to use vacation time or paid time to call out during peak time, it can be a fireable offense, or it could – it could get you penalized.

MARTIN: If you don’t come, like if you call in sick, for example?

LIEBER: Yeah, exactly.

MARTIN: OK. So you actually alluded to this. There have been various boycotts at Amazon warehouses in – mainly overseas. Would that be accurate?

LIEBER: I think that there definitely are a lot of strikes and walkouts in Amazon fulfillment centers in Europe. We’re definitely seeing a little bit of this movement in the United States. One Amazon warehouse manager that I interviewed had told me that, on Prime Day, the facility that she was working in, people were handing out flyers that they wanted to stage a mass walkout on Prime Day about two years ago and that the managers had been ordered to kind of collect the pamphlets and get rid of them.

You know, the flipside to that is that if people – I think if people were really, really concerned and they heard that these type of conditions were going on, I think that you’d see more boycotts. I think consumers are definitely interested in the story, but I’m not sure if it’s going to stop them from shopping on Amazon.

MARTIN: We know that you’ve heard from a number of disgruntled Amazon employees or employees who say that they found the conditions – well, in some cases, intolerable, but in other cases, tolerable but unpleasant. Have you heard from others? I mean, have other people commented on your stories to say that that’s not the full picture or that they just feel that it’s, you know, for whatever – the good outweighs the bad? Have you heard from other perspectives?

LIEBER: Sure. Sure. Well, I mean, Amazon has reached out to me specifically and have, you know, they’ve told me that these employees that I’ve been speaking to are one-off and it’s not the case all around. Actually, I was able to tour a fulfillment center in Staten Island a few weeks ago and, you know, talked to a few employees there who said that they were, you know, they were happy with the jobs, and they were happy with the wages. They were thrilled with the benefits.

I had a story go up on vox.com about what it was like to work the Black Friday shift. And I had people reach out to me who said that they worked at a warehouse, and this is what the job is. And, you know, they don’t agree with people who complain that it’s high-pressure and that it’s this type of job because the job is the job.

And what I want to say to that is, you know, at a certain point, people have to step back and, you know, wonder, like, what goes on inside these warehouses? What are workers saying? And the bottom line that the warehouse workers want me to tell people is that they are human beings that are packing their boxes, and it’s not always easy for them. And they want the company to kind of step up and listen to their demands.

MARTIN: That’s business reporter Chavie Lieber. She reports on Amazon for Vox, among other subjects that she covers. Chavie Lieber, Thanks so much for talking to us.

LIEBER: Thank you for your time.

MARTIN: We also reached out to Amazon for comment. In a statement, company officials said they work hard to provide a safe, quality work environment for their 250,000 employees across the U.S. They added, quote, “associates are the heart and soul of our operations.”

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Parkour Resists 'Hostile Takeover' By International Gymnastics

Many in the parkour community are resisting attempts by the International Gymnastics Federation to bring the sport under its umbrella. Here, Johan Tonnoir practices parkour in Paris in May.

Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images

Since its beginnings in the 1980s in France, parkour has been sporty – but not exactly Olympic sporty.

Parkour and its cousin freerunning involve scaling urban obstacles and using the city as a playground. Its adherents, called traceurs and traceuses, bound railings, climb walls, and leap across terrifying expanses.

But now parkour, emblematic of freedom and practiced risk-taking, is fighting for its autonomy — from the gymnastics establishment.

Earlier this month, the International Gymnastics Federation (the FIG, for its French appellation) voted to make parkour one of its official disciplines. The FIG has been moving quickly to make parkour its own. It staged two Parkour World Cup events this year in Japan and France, and announced plans for a Parkour World Championships in 2020. The group intends to lobby the International Olympic Committee to include parkour in the 2024 Olympics, as a discipline of gymnastics, The Associated Press reports.

All of this has sparked resistance among some of parkour’s founders and practitioners.

David Belle, considered to be the inventor of parkour, was recruited to be on the FIG’s Parkour Commission. But he soon quit, followed by four others who wrote an open letter complaining that the FIG is “trying to trying to go fast with very little or no transparency, no involvement of the international parkour community or national communities.”

The en-masse resignation of @gymnastics “Parkour Commission”

“The implementation is trying to go fast with very little or no transparency, no involvement of the international parkour community or national communities”

“We see problems that worries us for the future of parkour” pic.twitter.com/8iSjlPcakH

— Eugene Minogue (@EugeneMinogue) October 26, 2018

Members of the parkour community have been voicing its displeasure on Twitter using the hashtag #WeAreNOTGymnastics.

“Now THIS, Internet, is what cultural appropriation looks like,” wrote one. “Running and climbing and jumping is life, not ‘regulated’, corporate owned sport.”

“No other community has the right to make decisions for us,” tweeted New Zealand Parkour.

Last year, six national parkour associations came together to form Parkour Earth – a governing body founded with the specific goal of protecting “the sovereignty and autonomy of Parkour/Freerunning/Art Du Déplacement internationally.”

The group’s CEO, Eugene Minogue, called the FIG’s maneuvering “the equivalent of a hostile takeover.”

“They are completely whitewashing our sport, its integrity, its history, its lineage, its authenticity,” he told the AP — which notes that Olympic sports have absorbed their more youthful upstarts before, as skiing did with snowboarding.

Gymnastics’ governing bodies have been on the defensive after the drubbing they they took their handling of the Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal. But the FIG’s aggressive attempt to bring parkour into its fold may not turn out to be as easy a win as they’d hoped.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Altria Buys 35 Percent Stake In E-Cigarette Maker Juul

Signs in a Chicago shop window advertise e-cigarettes and pods from Juul in September. Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, announced Thursday it would buy a 35 percent stake in the company.

Scott Olson/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Scott Olson/Getty Images

Altria, the leading U.S. cigarette manufacturer, announced Thursday it will make a $12.8 billion investment in e-cigarette maker Juul – giving it a 35 percent stake in what had been perhaps its most worrisome competitor.

The move allows Altria, which is the parent company of Philip Morris, to hedge its bets on the future of nicotine, as cigarette smoking declines in the U.S.

“Today, we have been joined by an unlikely – and seemingly counterintuitive – investor in our journey,” Juul Labs CEO Kevin Burns said in a press release that seemed crafted to address a tide of criticism.

“We understand the controversy and skepticism that comes with an affiliation and partnership with the largest tobacco company in the US,” Burns wrote. “We were skeptical as well. But over the course of the last several months we were convinced by actions, not words, that in fact this partnership could help accelerate our success switching adult smokers.”

Juul’s USB drive-shaped devices have quickly reshaped the market since they launched in 2015. The press release makes repeated mention of adult smokers – no accident, in a week when Juul was called out by name by the U.S. Surgeon General in an advisory declaring youth e-cigarette use an epidemic.

That warning noted with alarm that Juul had experienced a 600 percent surge in sales from 2016 to 2017, and that its products present a number of risks for young people:

“All JUUL e-cigarettes have a high level of nicotine. A typical JUUL cartridge, or ‘pod,’ contains about as much nicotine as a pack of 20 regular cigarettes. These products also use nicotine salts, which allow particularly high levels of nicotine to be inhaled more easily and with less irritation than the free-base nicotine that has traditionally been used in tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. This is of particular concern for young people, because it could make it easier for them to initiate the use of nicotine through these products and also could make it easier to progress to regular e-cigarette use and nicotine dependence. However, despite these risks, approximately two-thirds of JUUL users aged 15-24 do not know that JUUL always contains nicotine.”

Cigarette smoking by U.S. adults declined from 20.9 percent in 2005 to 15.5 percent in 2016, according to the CDC – that’s less than half of what it was in 1964. Accordingly, cigarette sales have been falling: In 2017, they were down 3.5 percent from the year before.

As part of the deal, Altria will give Juul access to its valuable retail shelf space, meaning Juul products will be sold alongside brands like Marlboro, Parliament and Virginia Slims.

Juul’s popularity among teens has led to scrutiny over whether the company targeted its marketing to them. The company has changed the names of some of its flavors (“creme” instead of “crème brûlée,” “cucumber” rather than “cool cucumber”) and now requires its models to be over 35. The company also deleted its social media accounts.

The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids called the Altria-Juul announcement “truly alarming.”

“Altria has no interest in reducing the number of people who smoke cigarettes,” the group’s president, Matthew Myers, said in a statement. “They see Juul as their failsafe in case the cigarette market keeps declining so that they remain profitable no matter what happens. Altria’s interests are served by maximizing sales and profits from both the cigarette and e-cigarette markets, and they have every reason to push Juul to market its products in a way that does the least damage to the cigarette market.”

The New York Times notes that the deal also gives Juul access to Altria’s powerful lobbying and regulatory force. The F.D.A. has said it intends to create new regulations requiring traditional cigarette makers to reduce the amount of nicotine in their products.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Celebrated 33-Year-Old German Journalist Adds A Line To His Resume: Fraudster

A reporter with the German publication Der Spiegel has admitted to fabricating material in news stories.

picture alliance via Getty Image


hide caption

toggle caption

picture alliance via Getty Image

You could say he was a wunderkind.

Four years ago, Claas Relotius was named CNN’s Journalist of the Year. Earlier this month, the 33-year-old Der Spiegel writer was celebrated as Germany’s top reporter.

On Wednesday, his rising star came crashing down as a lengthy article in his own magazine outlined repeated falsification in his reporting. In fact, the piece said Relotius is “not a reporter,” and that “he tells fairy tales whenever he pleases.” The article continues: “truth and lies are confused in his texts, because some stories are clean … others completely invented.”

Claas Relotius: Er hat sein Talent missbraucht https://t.co/W7htj1oOJQ pic.twitter.com/KtZAsHwMOZ

— WELT (@welt) December 19, 2018

Relotius, who has admitted to faking some of his reporting, had written dozens of articles for Der Spiegel since 2011. According to a Q&A also published by the magazine Wednesday, Relotius identified 14 specific stories that included fictional dialogues, “character collages” and other incorrect or misleading details. He is no longer employed there.

“I’m sick, and I have to get help now,” an apologetic and embarrassed Relotius said in an interview with Der Spiegel, which has over 6 million online subscribers.

But his admission of guilt was apparently hard-won. On Dec. 3 — the same day he received the German press award — an Arizona woman raised the first questions surrounding his reporting and his profile of vigilante border guards in the southern U.S.

As Der Spiegel reports, Juan Moreno, his co-reporter on the story, started to investigate Relotius’ work, despite his repeated claims of honesty and other colleagues’ incredulity that their acclaimed coworker could be lying. Moreno returned to Arizona to re-interview people Relotius claimed to have spent time with. Some of his “sources” insisted they had never met him.

After being confronted, Relotius finally admitted to the fraud last week.

Relotius’ Arizona story wasn’t his only falsified work about the United States. A 2017 piece about a rural Minnesota town’s love of President Trump opened with a striking anecdote about a sign at the city’s entrance that read “Mexicans keep out.” Der Spiegel now says the sign never existed. Two residents of the town posted an article Wednesday outlining other fabrications in the piece.

Here’s more context about Claas Relotius’ fabricated portrayal of Fergus Falls, MN. Hope that it helps shed light on how our community and the rural narrative overall has been affected. https://t.co/i5uCBHdh3G

— Michele Anderson (@micheleeamn) December 19, 2018

Later that same year, Relotius reportedly invented a phone interview with Colin Kaepernick’s parents for a profile of the football star’s political activism.

“I tend to want to be in control,” Relotius told Der Spiegel, adding that if he wasn’t able to report a story to his satisfaction, he felt the urge to create a forgery. The magazine notes that while his stories were fact checked, there was “a basic trust that the editors at home give him.” Relotius has also written for a number of other news outlets, although it wasn’t immediately clear if that work also contained falsehoods.

Der Spiegel, which apologized to anyone who was inaccurately portrayed in their writer’s stories, announced that a committee would investigate the fraud. It also acknowledged that although Relotius had admitted to some untruths, the full extent of his deception might not yet be known.

“Can one believe him?” the magazine asks. “Couldn’t there clearly be more?”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Crypto Crash

80

2017 and 2018 saw the heady rise and the crazy crash of cryptocurrency. It was a wild ride. But what’s at the end? Will crypto start the long, slow climb to indispensable asset or the fast dive into tulip territory? We take a look with Hunter Horsley, co-founder and CEO of Bitwise Asset Management.

Music: “Deliberation”

Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Sen. Cory Booker Calls For More Transparency In Medicaid Drug Decisions

The “Medicaid Drug Decisions Transparency Act” would require pharmaceutical companies to disclose their payments to pharmacists and others who serve on state Medicaid drug boards — the advisory groups that decide which drugs Medicaid will and won’t cover.

Gary Waters/Ikon Images/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Gary Waters/Ikon Images/Getty Images

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., says he will introduce federal legislation this week that would require more transparency surrounding states’ Medicaid drug decisions. The bill comes in response to a recent investigation by the Center for Public Integrity and NPR.

The measure, known as the “Medicaid Drug Decisions Transparency Act,” would require pharmaceutical companies to disclose their payments to pharmacists and others who serve on state Medicaid drug boards. These boards help decide which drugs Medicaid patients will be able to access easily. Currently drugmakers must only disclose perks given to doctors, such as free dinners, speaking fees and consulting gigs. In addition, the bill would increase penalties for companies that fail to comply with reporting requirements.

“These are really nefarious tactics that drug companies use, and they use them to influence state Medicaid programs’ drug coverage decisions,” says Booker. “My bill’s going to address this problem by increasing transparency — shining a light onto these payments.”

The proposed federal legislation was prompted by the recent Medicaid, Under the Influence investigation from the Center for Public Integrity and NPR, which revealed how drugmakers influence states’ choices regarding drugs for Medicaid patients.

The investigation, published in July, found that drug companies swarm state Medicaid board meetings when their drugs are under consideration, and have given payments and perks to three out of five doctors recently serving on those boards. The companies’ efforts to undermine state drug cost controls have helped push up Medicaid expenses nationwide.

The Senate bill would also require states to publish and update the lists of members on their Medicaid drug boards. The Center for Public Integrity had to scour meeting minutes, call agencies and formally request public records to compile a list of board members across the U.S. Even so, reporters still could not obtain information on two committees in Illinois and South Carolina.

Booker’s bill would require the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide states with summaries of drug company payments made to members of their Medicaid drug committees.

With only weeks remaining in the current session of Congress, the bill is unlikely to pass. But Booker says he hopes it will help set the upcoming agenda for Democrats; he intends to reintroduce it in 2019.

The Center/NPR investigation previously prompted Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, to issue an executive order tightening his state’s ethics rules and to boot a doctor from the Medicaid committee who had received more than $700,000 in payments and perks from drugmakers. Officials in Colorado, New York and Texas also took action in response to the Medicaid investigation.

The Center for Public Integrity is a nonpartisan, nonprofit investigative news organization in Washington, D.C. You can follow Liz Essley Whyte on Twitter at @l_e_whyte.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)