Articles by admin

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Grindhouse 'Star Wars,' Tim Burton's 'Pinocchio' and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Reimagined Movie of the Day:

Mashable made a trailer that makes Star Wars into a Grindhouse movie:

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Artist Jerome Gomez mixed together Star Wars and Blade Runner for a piece he titles “A Dark Jedi and a Renegade Princess” (via Live for Films):

Misunderstood Movie of the Day:

The Wolf of Wall Street is badly analyzed by an alien in the latest episode of Earthling Cinema:

[embedded content]

Fan Build of the Day:

Learn how to make a replica golden snitch from the Harry Potter movies in the latest episode of DIY Prop Shop:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Who wouldn’t want another Hellboy sequel if all the characters were recast with pugs (via Fashionably Geek)?

Visual Effects Reel of the Day:

See why Jurassic World should have been nominated for an Oscar for its visual effects with this video from ILM (via io9):

[embedded content]

Fake Remake of the Day:

Tim Burton is apparently the go-to guy for directing live-action remakes of Disney’s animated classics, but here’s what it would look like if he directed an animated remake of Disney’s Pinocchio. See other reimagined Disney animated films at Nerd Approved.

Retrospective Trailer of the Day:

In honor of the 400th anniversary of William Shakespeare‘s death, the British Film Institute has programmed a series on Shakespeare on film. Here’s a trailer for the retrospective:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Jim Casey compiled what he believes to be the most beautiful shots in movie history (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 55th anniversary of the release of John Huston‘s The Misfits. Watch the original trailer for the film, which stars Marilyn Monroe, Clark Gable and Montgomery Clift, below.

[embedded content]

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Farm Subsidies Persist And Grow, Despite Talk Of Reform

A farmer deposits harvested corn outside a grain elevator in Virginia, Ill., in 2015. Corn and soy have fallen, and farmers are receiving payments under a new program. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that total government aid to farmers will swell to $23.9 billion in 2017.

A farmer deposits harvested corn outside a grain elevator in Virginia, Ill., in 2015. Corn and soy have fallen, and farmers are receiving payments under a new program. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that total government aid to farmers will swell to $23.9 billion in 2017. Seth Perlman/AP hide caption

toggle caption Seth Perlman/AP

Farm subsidies don’t lack for critics. Free-market conservatives and welfare state-defending liberals alike have called for deep cuts in these payments to farmers. After all, farmers, as a group, are wealthier than the average American. Why should they get tens of billions of dollars each year in federal aid?

Two years ago, when the most recent Farm Bill emerged from Congress, the measure’s authors proudly announced what sounded like bold cuts in these controversial programs. The Senate Agriculture Committee noted in a press release that the new law would eliminate one big subsidy altogether and save taxpayers a total of $23.3 billion over the following 10 years.

Those projected savings, it turns out, were a mirage. According new estimates for Farm Bill spending over the next few years released by the Congressional Budget Office, total government aid to farmers will swell to $23.9 billion in 2017.

“What happened to the savings taxpayers were promised?” says Colin O’Neil, from the Environmental Working Group, a long-time opponent of farm subsidies.

Actually, many opponents of government subsidies saw this coming. “Cynics like me fully expected this to work out the way it has,” says Bruce Babcock, an agricultural economist at Iowa State University. “Farm policy isn’t really about policy. It’s about farmers getting their money. And the agriculture committees in Congress are there to make sure that farmers get their money.”

Over the decades, Congress has periodically changed the way these programs work. This latest Farm Bill ditched a politically unpopular subsidy program that wrote checks to farmers simply based on the number of acres they owned. In its place, the law set up new programs that pay farmers when commodity prices fall. And indeed they have been falling since the last Farm Bill.

Many observers, in fact, expected corn and soybean prices to fall, because they had been extraordinarily high in recent years.

“Farmers made a gamble,” says David Orden, an agricultural economist at the International Food Policy Research Institute. “They were gambling that if prices came down, they’d get more money this way.” That gamble, it seems, paid off.

If prices stay low, or rebound, spending under some of these new programs should decline, but only gradually — and within a few years Congress will once again revise the Farm Bill.

Orden does believe that over the long term, there has been progress in abolishing some of the most wasteful farm subsidies. “We used to do all sorts of things to maintain high market prices for farmers,” he says.

For example, the government used to buy up large amounts of agricultural commodities and either store them or export them at much lower prices. It also paid farmers to take vast amounts of land out of production. Those programs, Orden says, were probably more damaging to the overall economy than the payments and crop insurance payouts that farmers get today.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Bosses Find Part-Time Workers Can Come With Full-Time Headaches

Skimping on health insurance carries a hidden price for some fast-food restaurants.
3:33

Download

Skimping on health insurance carries a hidden price for some fast-food restaurants. Paula Connelly/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Paula Connelly/Getty Images

Starting in 2016, the federal health law requires small employers to offer their full-time workers health insurance. In anticipation of the change, some fast-food restaurants looked to get around the law by making more workers part time. Now some owners are rethinking that approach.

At a Burger King off Highway 99 in California’s Central Valley, a half-dozen workers in black uniforms scurry around, grabbing packets of ketchup and stuffing paper bags with french fries.

Tiana Mua has worked here part time for almost a year. She’d like to be full time, but at this Burger King only the managers are full time. (The company didn’t respond to an interview request.)

Mua says that’s the situation at fast-food joints all over town. “They’re cutting back on all the jobs, and a lot of people have been let go and everything already,” Mua says.

One reason: The local economy is bad. People aren’t eating out as much, and sales are down. But there’s another reason that might explain why fast-food employees aren’t getting more hours: Obamacare.

Starting Jan. 1, businesses with 50 or more full-time employees must offer health insurance to all full-time staff or pay a hefty fine. Employers with 100 or more workers had to start offering coverage last year. But smaller businesses that operate on lower margins, especially restaurants, complained loudly about the cost.

And some fast-food franchise owners figured out a way to avoid paying for coverage: Just make as many workers as possible part time. A U.S. Chamber of Commerce survey found nearly 60 percent of small franchise businesses said they would make personnel changes like this.

“The ones that did it successfully did it three or four years ago,” says Kaya Bromley, an attorney who helps employers comply with the Affordable Care Act. But, Bromley says, some of the restaurant owners who cut hours to sidestep the health law now regret it.

“A lot of the fast-food franchisees that did this,” she says, “are now coming back and saying, ‘it was a great idea for reducing the number of people that I have to offer benefits, but now I can’t run my restaurants.’ “

They tell her it has been a nightmare trying to manage a part-time staff.

“Because you’ve got people who are less loyal, you’ve got people who are less skilled — who don’t understand the business,” she says. There’s also more employee turnover.

Bromley has seen many of those restaurants reverse course. “Employers think that there’s a shortcut here or there, and then they realize, yeah, that shortcut really hurt me more than it helped me,” she says.

The people hurt most by all the workforce management gymnastics are the people at the bottom of the restaurant pecking order who want to advance, but can’t, says Angelo Amador, vice president of labor and workforce policy for the National Restaurant Association.

“Someone who’s working part time, but wants more hours so they can move up the ladder, they can’t get the hours,” he says. “It ends up taking out that middle rung of employees.”

Obamacare has made restaurants less flexible, he says, mainly because it defines full-time work as 30 hours a week or more. Amador says most other laws restaurants have to comply with, like overtime pay, define full time as 40 hours. He thinks the Affordable Care Act should be changed for consistency.

“It would be much easier if we could have one definition of full time,” he says.

At the Carl’s Junior in Chowchilla, Calif., manager Silvia Campos tries to keep as many workers full time as possible. She says it makes her job easier. “It’s a small town,” she says. “For me, it’s hard to find a really good employee.”

But some workers don’t want more hours. Their part-time salary is low enough that they’re eligible for government coverage in California through Medicaid.

Some workers say they’re better off making less money and getting their coverage free from the state.

This story comes from a reporting partnership of NPR, KQED and Kaiser Health News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

John Scott Named MVP With 2 Goals In NHL All-Star Game

4:04

Download

John Scott is the most unlikely NHL All Star. NPR’s Kelly McEvers talks to Greg Wyshynski of Yahoo! Sports about how the enforcer scored two goals and was an MVP at Sunday night’s All-Star Game.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

All right, now for a story of a goon-made-good. Stay with me, here. NHL defenseman John Scott is an enforcer. And in hockey, the term for enforcer is goon. Goons aren’t paid to score goals. They’re paid to fight. So goons are unlikely heroes. But John Scott is a favorite of fans. They voted him into this year’s All-Star game much to the dismay of the NHL. And to the delight of hockey fans everywhere, Scott scored two goals in last night’s All-Star game and is now the most unlikely All-Star game MVP ever. Joining me on the line to talk about this is Greg Wyshynski of Yahoo Sports. Welcome.

GREG WYSHYNSKI: Great to be here. Thanks.

MCEVERS: All right, so how often do goons like John Scott actually make the All-Star game?

WYSHYNSKI: That would be never.

(LAUGHTER)

MCEVERS: OK.

WYSHYNSKI: They’re hardly ever – there have been a few through the years. Chris Nilan, who was an infamous fighter in the 1980s and ’90s was the in to an All-Star team at one point. But for the most part, these are players that are on the outside looking in while the skilled players in the National Hockey League do their thing in the All-Star game unless, of course, you’re the NHL and you open up the fan voting to allow any player to be elected to the All-Star game, which, in their tomfoolery, they did. And a chaotic group of miscreants and NHL fans on Reddit and social media pushed John Scott to the top of the popular vote. He had more votes than Alex Ovechkin, Patrick Kane, Jaromir Jagror and other stars, and he was an All-Star captain.

MCEVERS: I mean, I said that, you know, he was voted in to the dismay of the NHL. Explain how the league dealt with this and reacted to it.

WYSHYNSKI: Poorly would be the word I’d use.

MCEVERS: (Laughter) OK.

WYSHYNSKI: They – for the first time in my career as a sport’s writer, an All-Star vote was held where they didn’t reveal any of the vote totals during the voting, which is something, like, they like to crow about. They didn’t reveal the vote totals during the voting. They didn’t reveal the vote totals after the voting. Once this unlikely candidate led all voting, they didn’t do any kind of feature story on him or anything else.

But it goes beyond that. John Scott revealed in an article in The Players’ Tribune a few days before the All-Star game that the NHL actually was discouraging him taking this spot in their All-Star game. Somebody from the NHL actually said to John Scott, what will your daughters think if you take this spot in the All-Star game over somebody who is more deserving? And that was his breaking point. That was the moment in which John Scott decided, I’m going to go to this game because no one is going to try to…

MCEVERS: Tell me what to do.

WYSHYNSKI: …Tell me that my family’s ashamed of me.

MCEVERS: Wow. And so here we have this newly minted All-Star MVP, and now he’s actually going to be playing in the minor leagues for the St John’s Ice Caps in Newfoundland. What happened there?

WYSHYNSKI: He was playing with the Arizona Coyotes. In Scott’s theory, he was traded out of spite after refusing to step down from his All-Star game spot. The Montreal Canadiens team to which he was traded to put him in the American Hockey League. And the theory was, being that he wasn’t in the NHL anymore, he wouldn’t be in the NHL All-Star game. But the league said, you’re more than welcome to come. So not only was there an enforcer in the NHL All-Star game. There was a guy who was not even in the NHL anymore in the NHL All-Star game.

MCEVERS: And I got to ask, like, why would the NHL not want somebody to play in the All-Star game who the fans had voted?

WYSHYNSKI: Because it wasn’t planned, and they don’t roll with the punches very well, this league. But the beautiful irony of this whole thing is, none of this happens – none of this cult heroism and folk heroism and fans chanting MVP when John Scott touched the puck in the All-Star game happens if there isn’t a villain. And the NHL coming so hard down on this guy and trying to subvert the popular vote and trying to find ways around him being in the game created this environment where what was the class-clown-becoming-student-council-president all of a sudden becomes, like, the Joan of Arc of the All-Star game with all of the fans rallying around him and chanting his name all game.

MCEVERS: That’s Greg Wyshynski. He writes the Puck Daddy blog for Yahoo Sports. Thanks so much.

WYSHYNSKI: Anytime. Thanks for having me.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

In 'No Más Bebés,' A 'Perfect Storm' Led To Unwanted Sterilizations For Many Latinas

6:05

Download

About 40 years ago, Consuelo Hermosillo went to the hospital for an emergency cesarean section. Against her will, she left unable to have more children.

Transcript

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Now to another harrowing story about fertility, this one from the 1960s and ’70s Los Angeles. The first moments after the birth of a child are often the most intense of a mother’s life. There’s joy, but there can also be pain, exhaustion and confusion. It was in this vulnerable time that 10 women in Los Angeles say hospital officials forced or deceived them into getting sterilized, and they sued them for it. The new documentary “No Mas Bebes” examines their story. It premieres tomorrow night on PBS. From NPR’s Code Switch team, Shereen Marisol Meraji has more.

SHEREEN MARISOL MERAJI, BYLINE: After an emergency C-section at LA County Hospital, Consuelo Hermosillo got some unexpected news.

CONSUELO HERMOSILLO: The doctor walked in and said everything went fine. And I said, what am I going to use? Am I going to use birth control? He goes no, you don’t need anything. We cut your tubes. And I said why? He goes well, you signed for it. I said, me?

MERAJI: In “No Mas Bebes,” Hermosillo recalls the doctor’s visit that took place after she gave birth to her third child. She was in her early 20s, and it was September of 1973. Two years later, Hermosillo took part in a class-action lawsuit with nine other women who all claimed they were sterilized without their informed consent at LA County Hospital. All 10 plaintiffs were Mexican immigrants and poor or working-class, and they had similar stories. They had emergency C-sections, were given medication for excruciating labor pain and they say they couldn’t remember signing the consent form, they were confused about what they were signing or they were coerced into signing. Most spoke very little English.

MELVINA HERNANDEZ: (Speaking Spanish).

MERAJI: At 23 years old, Melvina Hernandez was rushed into a C-section at LA County Hospital because her baby was breech. She says a nurse told her in English that she needed to sign this paper now. Hernandez wanted to wait for her husband, but the nurse told her if she didn’t sign, they couldn’t operate and she’d die.

HERNANDEZ: (Speaking Spanish).

MERAJI: Hernandez says the nurse grabbed her hand and signed the paper for her. Four years later, she found out it was for a tubal ligation. Consuelo Hermosillo says she’s spent years trying to understand why this happened to them.

HERMOSILLO: Were they doing it for not supporting these kids in the future, or were they getting money at the hospital for doing more sterilization? I always kept those questions in me. I never get those answers.

MERAJI: Two women set out to find those answers in “No Mas Bebes.”

RENEE TAJIMA-PENA: I’m Renee Tajima-Pena, filmmaker and the director and co-producer of the film.

VIRGINIA ESPINO: I’m Virginia Espino. I’m a historian on and a co-producer of the film.

MERAJI: Espino and Tajima-Pena are LA natives, neighbors, longtime friends and colleagues. Espino learned about the sterilizations in graduate school studying Chicana history.

ESPINO: I grew up in northeast Los Angeles, very close to the LA County Hospital. So I was really shocked to hear that women were being sterilized there in the 1970s, a time when I was coming of age.

MERAJI: So horrified by the story, she devoted her studies to tracing the history behind it and would talk about it with Tajima-Pena when they were both new moms.

TAJIMA-PENA: I was in baby bliss, and I thought oh, this so profound. And it’s all those cliches you think about motherhood. And she told me about these women, you know, who were sterilized without their consent, against their will. And I was floored.

MERAJI: About a decade after those initial conversations, the two started production on “No Mas Bebes.” That meant finding the plaintiffs and defendants, all of whom hadn’t spoken about the case publicly in 35 years. Tajima-Pena said those willing to talk – both the women who were sterilized and the doctors who performed the sterilizations – all men – echoed their court testimony. The women still claim they never gave informed consent. And the doctors, like Jerry Neuman, still maintained their innocence.

JERRY NEUMAN: I knew personally I had not done anything. I could not for the life of me think of any of my colleagues who would have deliberately done this. We busted our – in order to provide care for a lot of people and got sued for it.

TAJIMA-PENA: The easiest thing to do is make a film about the good guys and the bad guys, the heroes and the villains.

MERAJI: Tajima-Pena says that “No Mas Bebes” goes beyond that simple narrative. She says the answers to plaintiff Consuelo Hermosillo’s questions are complicated. In 1970, Congress allocated millions for family planning. The money went to training, contraceptives and sterilizations. At the same time, mainstream white feminists were calling for stabilization on-demand while another popular movement, the zero population movement, supported sterilization as a way to combat overpopulation, which they claimed was destroying the planet. And that’s not all.

TAJIMA-PENA: You have attitudes about immigrants, hostility towards immigrants, this fear that poor women and working-class women are going to be having children and going on welfare. You had these cultural differences. You have all these things going on. And as a filmmaker, you kind of have to dig deeper beneath the surface and kind of look at those complexities.

MERAJI: For co-producer and historian Espino, it was important to provide as much historical context as possible.

ESPINO: So that everybody’s thinking critically about it and coming to their own conclusions about what does that really mean when you talk about reproductive justice, reproductive rights, reproductive choice?

MERAJI: Espino says we talk a lot about the choice not to have kids, but what about the choice to have them? Consuelo Hermosillo says that decision was taken away from her.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY FILM, “NO MAS BEBES”)

HERMOSILLO: (Singing in Spanish).

MERAJI: In one of the film’s final scenes, Hermosillo is giving her baby granddaughter a bottle and reflecting on her hopes for the future.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY FILM, “NO MAS BEBES”)

HERMOSILLO: I want her to have liberty on doing what she wants, going to school wherever she wants, decides how many kids she wants.

MERAJI: The filmmakers say “No Mas Bebes” documents a history that continues to repeat itself. They point to the nearly 150 women sterilized in California prisons between 2006 and 2010 as a recent example. Shereen Marisol Meraji, NPR News.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Why Some Still Can't Find Jobs As The Economy Nears 'Full Employment'

Economists use the phrase "full employment" to mean the number of people seeking jobs is roughly in balance with the number of openings.
3:37

Download

Economists use the phrase “full employment” to mean the number of people seeking jobs is roughly in balance with the number of openings. heshphoto/Getty Images/Image Source hide caption

toggle caption heshphoto/Getty Images/Image Source

“Full employment” is a phrase economists use to explain how the job market recovers from a recession. We’ll be hearing this phrase a lot as the Labor Department releases the latest jobs data on Friday. It’s expected to show that employers added even more workers in January.

But the phrase doesn’t tell the full story for millions of Americans either still out of work or who are looking for something better than part-time work.

What is full employment and what does it mean?

To economists, it’s when the number of people seeking jobs is roughly in balance with the number of openings. It doesn’t mean the unemployment rate is zero because that’s not realistic. There will always be some unemployment. Companies have to close down obsolete operations, individuals have to quit their jobs to move with a spouse, or they might move to look for something better with higher pay.

If the economists don’t mean zero unemployment when they use the phrase “full employment,” what do they mean?

Economists say a healthy job market has an unemployment rate somewhere between 4.6 percent and 5 percent. Some people are quitting, some people are getting hired — there’s churn but no despair. In December, the national rate was 5 percent and now many predictions have the rate gliding down to 4.6 percent by July. So bingo, we’re basically there at full employment. If all goes as expected in 2016, people who want jobs will be able to find them, and employers who need workers will be able to attract them.

Is it really fair to use the term “full employment” when that doesn’t seem to match the reality that a lot of people are experiencing?

Those words can hit hard and they can hurt because it sounds like you must be doing something wrong. But really, unemployment is very regional. In West Virginia, there are counties today with unemployment rates of 12 percent or even 13 percent. But in California’s Silicon Valley, the rate is virtually zero, with companies battling each other for workers. So geography matters!

And there are big differences based on age. For black teenagers nationwide, the unemployment rate is 21 percent. For women of any color, if you’re 50, studies show you have a tough time getting back to the workforce. You become long-term unemployed. Besides age and location, more than anything, education determines your unemployment rate. For college graduates, it’s 2.3 percent unemployment; for high school dropouts, 7 percent.

Is “full employment” something that a lot of Americans are still going to experience as something very unsatisfying?

If you’re a 30-year-old with a college degree and a U-Haul, you’re all set, you can find jobs. If you want to go to night school and you want to move, you can be part of that full employment economy. But the reality for a lot of people is that it is very hard. About 7.9 million people remain unemployed because they may not fit that demographic description. Like women in their 50s who may actually be at the center of a whole financial and emotional ecosystem, taking care of aging parents, as well as children and grandchildren, it can be very hard to move.

Is this sort of a new normal in that what we call “full employment” is really not at all “full” but very uneven?

Yes, we can say now that for younger, tech-savvy, well-educated people, jobs abound. The recession truly is over. And 2016 should be a great year for job hunting. But for people in their 50s with rusty skills or teenagers with relatively little education, the phrase “full employment” is a painful taunt.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Australian Open Results: Kerber Beats Williams, Djokovic Wins For 6th Time

Serbia's Novak Djokovic has won the Australian Open six times — in 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2015, and then on Sunday.

Serbia’s Novak Djokovic has won the Australian Open six times — in 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2015, and then on Sunday. William West/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption William West/AFP/Getty Images

At the Australian Open on Saturday, in her first Grand Slam final, Angelique Kerber pulled off a stunning win over Serena Williams. On Sunday, Novak Djokovic beat Andy Murray to win his sixth Australian Open, and the 11th Grand Slam title of his career.

Kerber’s win in the women’s tournament was a huge upset, as Howard Bryant told NPR’s Scott Simon on Saturday. Williams, the world’s top-ranked female tennis player, looked like she was headed for victory:

“Serena Williams went the entire tournament without dropping a set. She dominated. She looked like she had come back after losing the U.S. Open last year to Roberta Vinci,” Bryant said.

But the final game belonged to Kerber, a German athlete who has been among the sport’s top 10 players for four years, Bryant says. Saturday’s game was Kerber’s first grand-slam final — and then her first title, in a 6-4, 3-6, 6-4 win.

Angelique Kerber of Germany celebrates winning the Women's Singles Final against Serena Williams during the 2016 Australian Open on Saturday.

Angelique Kerber of Germany celebrates winning the Women’s Singles Final against Serena Williams during the 2016 Australian Open on Saturday. Darrian Traynor/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Darrian Traynor/Getty Images

On Sunday, Djokovic, the world No. 1 in men’s tennis, beat Andy Murray 6-1, 7-5, 7-6. It’s the Serbian’s sixth Australian Open victory and continues a perfect streak — he’s won every final he’s ever played in that tournament.

It also brings Djokovic to a total of 11 career Grand Slam titles, tying him with Australia’s Rod Laver and Sweden’s Bjorn Borg. Among men, only Roy Emerson, Rafael Nadal, Pete Sampras and Roger Federer have more Grand Slam wins.

For Murray, it was the fifth Australian Open final where he fell short of victory — and the fourth time the Scottish player lost the tournament to Djokovic.

In an emotional speech after the game, Murray thanked his wife — pregnant with their first child, and approaching her due date — and vowed to be on the first plane home.

The tournament was partially overshadowed by an investigative report, published by the BBC and Buzzfeed two weeks ago, alleging widespread match-fixing and corruption in tennis, as Laura Wagner reported for the Two-Way at the time:

“The report — based on information from a ‘cache of leaked documents’ from a 2008 probe commissioned by tennis authorities, the statistical analysis of 26,000 tennis matches and betting information from 2009 through 2015 — alleges that some players were paid to throw matches and that tennis officials did not act on the findings. The report says there is evidence that ‘winners of singles and doubles titles at Grand Slam tournaments are among [a] core group of 16 players who have repeatedly been reported for losing games when highly suspicious bets have been placed against them.’

“The report also accuses the Tennis Integrity Unit, which was created following the 2008 probe, of not sufficiently pursuing and prosecuting allegations of match-fixing. Top tennis officials have categorically denied this.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Vân-Ánh Võ's 'The Odyssey' Tells Refugee Stories Past And Present

Vân-Ánh Võ was inspired by the plight of refugees to create a concert piece called The Odyssey: From Vietnam to America."
5:08

Download

Vân-Ánh Võ was inspired by the plight of refugees to create a concert piece called The Odyssey: From Vietnam to America.” Courtesy of Yerba Buena Center for the Arts hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of Yerba Buena Center for the Arts

Hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing their country by boat. That’s Syria today. It’s also Vietnam in 1979.

Vân-Ánh Võ left Vietnam more than a decade after that, and under far different circumstances: She was already an award-winning musician, bound for Carnegie Hall. But the plight of her countrymen, and that of today’s refugees, has inspired her to create a new concert piece that will be touring the country.

Võ grew up in Hanoi, living with the legacy of the Vietnam war. Her family’s washbasin was an old artillery shell. Her school bell was a piece of an American B-52 bomber; she says her teacher would bang on it to signal recess.

Võ left her homeland in 1995, after the United States normalized relations with Vietnam. She wound up in Fremont, Calif., near the large Vietnamese American community in San Jose.

“After having food, after having fun, we all end up talking how we came here,” she says of her friends.

Võ learned that many of her friends in the United States were “boat people.” When the war ended, ethnic hostilities forced hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, most of Chinese descent, to flee on overcrowded boats. Many died on the South China Sea.

“I wonder how they can find the strength,” she says, “and how they can find hope.”

The more she heard about their stories, she says, the more she wanted to share them — especially after the news turned to people fleeing Syria in boats.

So Võ has written The Odyssey: From Vietnam to America,” a 40-minute multimedia piece about the boat people.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Võ’s father played guitar in the North Vietnamese army during the war. Võ herself has won awards for her skill with traditional instruments, like the single-stringed dan bau, the bamboo xylophone, and especially the Vietnamese zither, the dan tranh.

“That’s the power and my luck and my fortune,” she says, “of learning traditional music.”

Since arriving in the United States, Võ has made strong musical connections. She has performed and recorded with Kronos Quartet and toured the country playing and singing her own compositions, which blend Vietnamese and Western traditions.

When she was ready to tell the story of the Vietnamese boat people, Võ didn’t feel comfortable going to her friends. So she approached Asian-Americans for Community Involvement in nearby Santa Clara. The organization was founded in 1979 to help Vietnamese refugees; president Michele Lew says the group doesn’t usually work with artists, but that storytelling can be helpful.

“We have found that storytelling … is a powerful hook to talk about health and wellness issues, such as the refugee experience,” she says.

Lew’s organization helped Võ connect with almost 60 boat people, whom the musician then interviewed. She weaves audio and video from her conversations with them into The Odyssey.

During the performance, a video screen shows what could be the sail of a boat, plus Võ’s group: Japanese taiko drum, electric cello, accordion, and Võ singing and playing traditional instruments. The aim is to re-create the journey of the boat people, including the sound of the ocean carrying them from Vietnam.

One person Võ interviewed for The Odyssey is software engineer Mai Bui. Sitting in the living room of her Bay Area home, Bui recalls how she and her brother spent days on a crowded boat, without food or water, until a Thai merchant ship towed them into Bangkok. They ran at night to avoid pirates.

“The ocean sound is really romantic,” she says, “but at that time, it’s scary.” She says she still cannot look at the ocean at night without thinking of her journey.

This isn’t the only memory of the Vietnam War that Võ is addressing through music this year. She’s performing a new work called My Lai, by Jonathan Berger, with Kronos Quartet. She’s also taking The Odyssey on the road for performances in places with large Vietnamese-American populations, including Washington, D.C., southern California’s Orange County, and Houston, Texas.

Võ says The Odyssey is a plea on behalf of all refugees, and against the wars that divide us.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

SAG Awards: Idris Elba Makes History and 'Spotlight' Takes Best Ensemble

Idris Elba becomes the first ever individual SAG Award winner without an Oscar nomination, and Spotlight finally gets a well-deserved win for Best Ensemble during a SAG Awards that featured at least one adorable Jacob Tremblay moment and even more momentum for Brie Larson (Best Actress, Room), Alicia Vikander (Best Supporting Actress, The Danish Girl) and Leonardo DiCaprio (Best Actor, The Revenant) heading into the Oscars on February 28.

[embedded content]

Check out the full list of this year’s SAG winners below.

Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture
Beasts of No Nation
The Big Short

WINNER: Spotlight
Straight Outta Compton
Trumbo

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture
Rooney Mara, Carol
Rachel McAdams, Spotlight
Helen Mirren, Trumbo
WINNER: Alicia Vikander, The Danish Girl
Kate Winslet, Steve Jobs

[embedded content]

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture
Christian Bale, The Big Short
WINNER: Idris Elba, Beasts of No Nation
Mark Rylance, Bridge of Spies
Michael Shannon, 99 Homes
Jacob Tremblay, Room

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role in a Motion Picture
Cate Blanchett, Carol
WINNER: Brie Larson, Room
Helen Mirren, Woman in Gold
Saoirse Ronan, Brooklyn
Sarah Silverman, I Smile Back

[embedded content]

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role in a Motion Picture
Bryan Cranston, Trumbo
Johnny Depp, Black Mass
WINNER: Leonardo DiCaprio, The Revenant
Michael Fassbender, Steve Jobs
Eddie Redmayne, The Danish Girl

[embedded content]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Latitudes: Our Favorite Global Music Right Now

Italy's Canzoniere Grecanico Salentino.

Italy’s Canzoniere Grecanico Salentino. Courtesy of the artists hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of the artists

Italy wasn’t a single nation until about 150 years ago, and there are some really fascinating regions that remain distinct. A case in point: the cultural, artistic and linguistic traditions that ground Canzoniere Grecanico Salentino (CSG), who come from Salento, on Italy’s “boot heel” in Salento, Puglia. Much of their music is based on the taranta (also known as pizza), a dance rooted in ancient local trance ritual.

Forty years after its founding, CGS is now in its second generation of members, but they haven’t lost their roots. And they’ve pushed their sound into the 21st century through collaborations with other artists. Their new song “Taranta” finds them working with popular Italian composer Ludovico Einaudi, who co-wrote the song with the band’s leader, Mauro Durante.

[embedded content]
Canzoniere Grecanico Salentino YouTube

A lot of guitar fans have been eagerly awaiting the next album by Niger’s Bombino, and now he’s making good on his followup to 2013’s Nomad. The new project is called Azel; produced by Dirty Projectors‘ David Longstreth and recorded in upstate New York, it will be released in April. Here’s a teaser in the form of “Inar (If You Know the Degree of My Love For You).” Bombino’s sweet vocals and quiet presence belie his fierce guitar and songwriting skills.

I particularly love the tight-lipped exchange in French at the end of the video. “That works?” someone calls out, presumably about the take. Barely a response. “It’s good, right?” Finally, Bombino: “Mmm-hmm.” When he’s really pressed, he mutters, “Yeah.”

[embedded content]
Bombino Official YouTube

If you really need to get your blood pumping, there’s no better place than the wrestling dream world that A Tribe Called Red creates for their song “Suplex,” featuring Northern Voice. This trio of Ottowa-based DJs layers electronic dance music with the sounds of their own First Nations cultures and socially conscious contexts.

As one of the group’s members, Bear Witness, told Fader when the video was first released: “In North America we had pros like Chief Jay Youngblood and Wahoo McDaniel who were indigenous, but had to dress in headdress and tassels to compete. The idea of the video was to show that connection we made to these people beyond stereotypes, but also to see an indigenous character make it, without needing the stereotype.”

[embedded content]
A Tribe Called Red YouTube

Speaking of getting all fired up: Remember Lady Leshurr and her “Queen’s Speech” series? She finished out 2015 with one more fireworks display of pop-pop-pop-pop wordplay. Between her previous “brush your teeth” refrain and her newest chorus/insult — “Your lips look like crispy bacon!” — haters should definitely keep their oral hygiene in check.

[embedded content]
Lady Leshurr YouTube

I was sad to learn of the death of eminent Indian dancer and choreographer Mrinalini Sarabhai at age 97 on Jan. 21. Not only was she a very fine technician (and, as it happens, the wife of Vikram Sarabhai, a scientist acknowledged as the father of India’s space program) but as an artist she pushed boundaries. Sarabhai was among the first women to perform the theatrical kathakali style, which was historically the exclusive preserve of men. Even more crucially, she used the vocabulary of ancient classical dance and classical music to explore contemporary social issues, from female suicide to the treatment of dalits, or “untouchables.” As she told filmmaker Anupama Srinivasan in 2003, “Art can speak in a much louder tone, because art speaks through beauty.”

[embedded content]
PBST India YouTube

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.