Articles by admin

No Image

Ship That Breast Milk For You? Companies Add Parent-Friendly Perks

Some companies are offering compensation beyond paid parental leave, covering surrogacy and adoption, or even shipping breast milk home to baby for traveling moms.

Gary Waters/Ikon Images/Getty Images

A handful of companies are offering parental benefits that go way beyond just paid leave, to include things like surrogacy reimbursement, egg freezing or breast milk shipping for traveling mothers.

As competition for talent heats up, companies see it as a relatively cheap way to recruit, retain and motivate their employee base.

This month, Johnson & Johnson extended fertility treatment benefits to same-sex couples and increased coverage to $35,000 for full- and part-time U.S. employees. It upped reimbursements for surrogacy and adoption to $20,000 — and it also ships breast milk.

“We wanted to be a leader in this space,” says Peter Fasolo, Johnson & Johnson chief human resources officer. Taking care of employees in this way costs far less than, say, health insurance, in part because the benefits are used by a minority of workers, and generally on a one-time or short-term basis. “They’re really not that expensive, to be frank with you.”

It may not be a lot of money for the company, but it can be for an individual employee.

Bruce Elliott, manager of benefits for the Society for Human Resource Management, says the amount Johnson & Johnson offers is unusually high. “We don’t see a lot of that. You know, we will see adoption support typically capped at about $5,000,” he says.

Elliott says rich benefits are more common in tech and finance. Ernst & Young has offered breast milk shipping for years, and last year, IBM, Accenture and Twitter added it. Apple and Facebook started covering egg freezing two years ago.

Clif Bar, the energy food company, instituted a breast milk shipping benefit recently that has made a huge difference for Marin Vaughn, a customer manager. Instead of schlepping pumped milk home in suitcases packed with ice when she came home from work travel, she now just requests supplies that allow her to refrigerate and ship the milk back home.

“So it just goes FedEx overnight; it’s super easy. I wish it had been around earlier,” when she had her first child three years ago, she says.

But the companies bolstering their family friendly benefits are largely ones where talent is in short supply. Outside of those rarefied places, it’s still uncommon.

According to SHRM, fewer than a third of employers, 27 percent, cover in vitro fertilization treatment. Adoption and surrogacy benefits are rarer still, and usually take the form of paid leave, not reimbursement. Seventeen percent offer adoption leave; 5 percent offer paid leave for parents having a child through a surrogate, SHRM says.

Ellen Bravo, executive director of advocacy group Family Values@Work, says 60 percent of women work in places without lactation rooms.

“For them it means squeezing into a bathroom stall, the most unsanitary place to pump milk,” Bravo says. And some employers won’t even allow pumping in bathrooms. She cites a discrimination suit filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission this month by four female Frontier Airlines pilots alleging, in part, insufficient support for breast-feeding moms.

A Frontier Airlines spokesman says accommodations are made where possible, but allowing pilots to pump in flight could disrupt service, embarrass crew members or pose a security risk.

Though there are exceptions, most employment experts say there’s a big generational and cultural shift toward parent-friendly policies.

Kate Torgersen founded Milk Stork, a company that handles the logistics of breast milk shipping, and says she thinks young parents are demanding more of employers.

“They’re ambitious about their parenting,” she says. “They know about the value of breast-feeding, they’re incredibly informed and they’re vocal about what their needs are.”

Milk Stork launched less than a year ago. Since then, Torgersen says, the company has signed on a dozen corporate clients and is talking to many more.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Baylor Demotes President, Fires Football Coach Amid Sexual Assault Scandal

Baylor University demoted its president and fired the head football coach for their handling of allegations of sexual assault by members of the school’s football team. NPR’s Audie Cornish talks to Paula Lavigne of ESPN’s Outside the Lines, who reported on the cases and how Baylor officials failed to investigate the allegations and violated Title IX federal law.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Administrators at Baylor University didn’t do anything to protect students when they learned of a potential pattern of sexual violence by multiple football players. Coaches and school leaders sometimes treated alleged victims with hostility. Those are just two of the scathing conclusions and an independent review of how Baylor University handles sexual assault cases. Baylor’s football Coach Art Briles was fired this week and university President Kenneth Starr was demoted – and yes, it’s that Ken Starr, the former prosecutor who investigated the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal. Paula Lavigne is an investigative reporter with ESPN’s “Outside The Lines.” They’ve done some of the most extensive reporting on allegations against Baylor players.

Welcome to the program.

PAULA LAVIGNE: Thank you.

CORNISH: Ken Starr will still teach law and serve as chancellor at Baylor. And, of course, he actually helped commission the “Outside” review which led to his removal as president. What does the review say he did exactly?

LAVIGNE: The review doesn’t actually name anyone in particular, but it outlines quite a pattern of inaction from the very root of who these women were reporting to all the way up. And it was saying that there wasn’t a system set up, people didn’t know where to report, cases fell through the cracks. And at Baylor, Ken Starr is the ultimate decision-maker in these cases. That’s what their policy says and, you know, at the end of the day, he’s the one who needs to be accountable.

CORNISH: Now, the most critical portions of the review focus on the football leadership. Coach Art Briles helped turn the team around athletically, helped bring in millions of dollars in revenue, but how did the report describe his role in these allegations?

LAVIGNE: Well, the overall report, as I just mentioned, talks about just sort of this pattern of inaction, this pattern of not having appropriate reporting and response set up. But what sets the football department apart is that it describes deliberate actions by football officials of trying to circumvent the process – talking about dissuading complaints from going up to the proper channels from getting student athletes transferred out of the school when something came up instead of keeping them around and dealing with it and addressing the problem. And I think that’s what stood out is that, you know, there was inaction everywhere, but within the football department, there was a real deliberate attempt to try to sweep these things under the rug.

CORNISH: After all the reporting you’ve done, was there anything in this independent review from this Philadelphia law firm that surprised you?

LAVIGNE: What surprised me was how bad it really was. I mean, we knew from talking to the victims and even talking to the student athletes themselves and parents and others that this was happening, that people were coming and asking for help or they were hoping to get justice and they weren’t getting either. What we didn’t realize was how bad and how deliberate it really was.

CORNISH: Is there anything in the report that could allow for criminal prosecutions that would help make those cases?

LAVIGNE: Well, I think that’s going to be kind of an interesting next question is whether or not any of these women will be able to take this and try to use it, you know, not only to try to pursue criminal charges, but also there is a pending civil case right now involving one of the women. And, you know, the violations outlined in this report I would think would certainly advance her cause. You know, they’re going to run into some other, you know, logistical issues in terms of statute of limitations and so forth, but that’s definitely on the table.

CORNISH: To your mind, how does what’s been uncovered at Baylor fit into this larger conversation about sexual assault on campus, about athletic programs that operate as if they’re above the rules?

LAVIGNE: Well, we’re focusing on Baylor today, right, but this is a problem at so many college campuses across the country. I mean, what sort sets Baylor apart is the fact that we have so many cases. I mean, it’s – I think we had five individuals, and that doesn’t even count the domestic violence and the other cases that we’re aware of that, you know, haven’t come forward. But I think that this needs to send a message to those schools that they need to do a better job with this. I mean, I would’ve thought that by now they would’ve already gotten the word that, you know, you can’t sweep these things under the rug. Well, if this case doesn’t do that, if the firing of a coach and the demotion of a president doesn’t send enough – a big enough signal then I don’t know what will.

CORNISH: Paula Lavigne. She’s an investigative reporter with ESPN’s “Outside The Lines.”

Thank you so much for speaking with us.

LAVIGNE: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Pittsburgh Stops Tampa Bay In Game 7, Will Face San Jose For Stanley Cup

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray makes a kick save Thursday against Brian Boyle of the Tampa Bay Lightning during the third period in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals in Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray makes a kick save Thursday against Brian Boyle of the Tampa Bay Lightning during the third period in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals in Pittsburgh. Matt Kincaid/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Matt Kincaid/Getty Images

Sharks vs. penguins is not typically an even matchup in the wild. Then again, the feathery penguins don’t have Sidney Crosby.

The Pittsburgh Penguins star says his team used “desperation level” effort in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals on Thursday, claiming a 2-1 win and a matchup against the San Jose Sharks for the championship.

Bryan Rust scored a pair of second-period goals and Matt Murray stopped 16 shots to lift the Penguins over the Lightning and send the franchise to the Stanley Cup Final for the first time since 2009.

Pittsburgh will host Western Conference champion San Jose in Game 1 of the final at 8 p.m. ET Monday night, with the game broadcast on NBC.

Jonathan Drouin scored his fifth goal of the playoffs for the Lightning and Andrei Vasilevskiy made 37 saves, but it wasn’t enough to send Tampa Bay back to the Cup Final for a second straight year. Captain Steven Stamkos had two shots in his return from a two-month layoff while dealing with a blood clot.

Pittsburgh had dropped five straight Game 7s at home, including a 1-0 loss to Tampa Bay in 2011 in a series in which both Crosby and Evgeni Malkin missed due to injury. That loss had become symbolic of the franchise’s postseason shortcomings following that gritty run to the Cup in 2009 that culminated with a Game 7 win in Detroit that was supposed to be the launching pad of a dynasty.

Seven long years later, with an entirely new cast around mainstays Crosby, Malkin, Kris Letang, Chris Kunitz and Marc-Andre Fleury, the Penguins are finally heading back.

Joel Ward of the San Jose Sharks celebrates after scoring his second goal Wednesday in San Jose against Brian Elliott and the St. Louis Blues in the Western Conference Finals.

Joel Ward of the San Jose Sharks celebrates after scoring his second goal Wednesday in San Jose against Brian Elliott and the St. Louis Blues in the Western Conference Finals. Ezra Shaw/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

They’ll face a San Jose team that wrapped up the Western Conference Finals on Wednesday with 5-2 win over St. Louis. It’s the 25-year-old franchise’s first Stanley Cup Finals, and comes a year after the team missed the playoffs entirely.

Captain Joe Pavelski scored an early goal, Joel Ward added two of his own, Logan Couture had an empty-netter and Joonas Donskoi also scored for the Sharks, while Martin Jones made 24 saves.

With the loss, the Blues’ postseason woes continue as the franchise still seeks its first championship and first trip to the Stanley Cup Final since 1970. Coach Ken Hitchcock’s second goalie change of the series did not work as Brian Elliott allowed four goals on 26 shots in his return to the net.

Vladimir Tarasenko, a 40-goal scorer in the regular season, got his first points of the series when he scored twice in the third period but it was too late for the Blues.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bryan Singer Says 'X-Men: Apocalypse' Is Not the End of a Trilogy

When X-Men: Apocalypse hits theaters on May 27, it might feel very much like a conclusion to the story that was first introduced in 2011’s X-Men: First Class, capping off a trilogy that also featured the hit X-Men: Days of Future Past as its centerpiece. Those who’ve been following the series since First Class will definitely find certain character and story arcs twisting towards an inevitable (but temporary) conclusion, but those who’ve been tuning in since 2000’s X-Men may find even more.

Fandango recently sat down with X-Men: Apocalypse director Bryan Singer for a sprawling conversation about Apocalypse, as well as the five other X-Men films that have dazzled audiences for almost two decades. In Singer’s mind, Apocalypse doesn’t just wrap up a story that began five years ago — instead it caps off a journey that began long before that.

“To me this is not the end of a trilogy. To me this is the climax of six movies, including X-Men 1, 2 and 3,” he says. “It incorporates pieces and homages and reflections back on those previous movies. I don’t call it a sequel or a prequel – I call it an in-betweenquel. It harks upon all of those movies, and because it’s ultimately about the formation of the X-Men, it’s the beginning of endless possibilities with these characters.”

Endless possibilities, you say?

Fandango spoke to Singer about some of those possibilities (think outer space-y), as well as what the future may hold for Wolverine, and we’ll dole out some of those details as we inch closer to Apocalypse‘s release. But what it does point to is the fact that while Apocalypse may feel like the end of a six-film series (or “sixology,” as Singer calls it), the larger X-universe is just starting to find its groove.

[embedded content]

In addition to Apocalypse, Fox is also working on a third Wolverine sequel (now in production), a New Mutants movie, a solo Gambit film and a Deadpool sequel. And that’s just on the big screen. On the small screen, they’re already hard at work on two X-related shows, Hellfire and Legion, which Singer says will eventually cross over to the bigger budgeted big-screen properties.

“The idea is to do something very new and very different with Legion,” he explains. “Since it’s television, you can’t do the same level of visual effects [as a big movie], so you have to find other dramatic ways of telling the story. What’s great about these universes and particularly the X-Men universe is it’s very grounded in its characters and its themes, so even if the tone is different or the show is smaller than a movie, it can still have very strong characters and bring in a supernatural element in a very tasteful and fun way,” he says. And when the time is right you can cross over and remind people that they’re part of a bigger universe.”

Singer, who in many ways is the godfather of the modern superhero genre, says that the success of films like Deadpool and these upcoming TV shows is what’s crucial when it comes to the continuing success of the superhero genre.

“I think the individual characters have to be discovered and exploited for their own kinds of tonality, like Deadpool, which is a good example,” Singer explains. “To make lesser known characters relevant to the general public. The X-Men universe is enormously expansive – it’s every bit as large as the remaining Marvel universe or DC universe. It just takes the right hands and right cast to find the story in these characters, whether they’re the famous ones or the lesser known characters. That may make for some event pictures, like Apocalypse, or it’ll lend itself to smaller fare.”

When it comes to Apocalypse, the great thing about the movie, according to Singer, is that it both functions as the culmination of six movies, as well as an origin story for people who’ve never even seen an X-Men movie before.

In fact, it’s those people who the director most hopes to see in theaters come May 27.

“I hope that audiences who’ve never seen an X-Men movie show up with the confidence that they don’t have to have seen any other X-Men movie because this one introduces the universe, introduces the X mansion, introduces the old characters, as well as the new characters, who are all playing characters in their beginnings. So if you’ve never seen an X-Men movie, you will not be lost and you will have a great time. I’m hoping that audience shows up.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

GOP Congressman Defends House Zika Funding Package

NPR’s Audie Cornish talks with Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma about why the House funding package is enough for now to confront the spread of the Zika virus in the U.S.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said today that he hopes Congress does the right thing to support fighting the Zika virus without diverting money from other efforts, including Ebola. And Congress is having trouble getting on the same page about Zika. The Senate passed a bill last week that would provide $1.1 billion for mosquito control and vaccine research.

The House version provides around $620 million, which would be redirected from an Ebola fund, among other sources. Now, this split comes as we learned in the last week that nearly 300 pregnant women in the U.S. and its territories have the Zika virus. Republican Congressman Tom Cole of Oklahoma is a cosponsor of the House bill.

Welcome to the program.

TOM COLE: Hey, it’s great to be with you.

CORNISH: Earlier this week, we heard from Ron Klain, who led the White House response to Ebola. And he said this, it’s not a question of whether babies will be born in the U.S. with microcephaly as a result of Zika. It’s a question of when and how many? And he said for years to come, these children will be a human reminder of the cost of absurd wrangling in Washington.

What is your response to that?

COLE: Well, frankly, I think he’s misinformed. The $600 million has already been appropriated. That somehow gets lost in the process. And the moment the president declared emergency, he was informed by the House Appropriations Committee, spend whatever you need. You’ve got plenty of money in various funds. We will backfill and replace that money as needed.

This bill is an additional $620-odd million, so roughly two thirds of the $1.9 billion that the president’s requested. The rest will be provided in the normal appropriations process. The only real dispute here is do you simply charge this to the national credit card, that is, not offset it – just go borrow additional money?

Or do you use existing funds and the normal funds and appropriations to take care of what’s genuinely an emergency and ought to get top priority in terms of funding?

CORNISH: Do you have any concerns about appropriations being held up this fall and holding up this effort?

COLE: Not in terms of this because first of all, the administration literally has billions of dollars, unobligated dollars, set aside to use and the assurance that the money, as used, will be replaced as needed.

CORNISH: There’s been some talk of a public health emergency response fund, sort of like a FEMA for public health emergencies. We’ve had the head of the CDC, Tom Friedan, say that he’s heard from both Republicans and Democrats that this could be helpful in cases like this where time is of the essence. Where do you stand on that idea?

COLE: I think there’s considerable merit in that proposal. We have that with FEMA, and it’s big enough to take care of, quote, “an average disaster.” It’s not big enough, for instance, to take care of something like a Hurricane Sandy or Katrina. So I think that’s something we ought to look at. We are looking at it, and I would just ask people to look at the track record here.

We’ve put more money in CDC than the president asked for, more money in NIH than he asked for. We will do that again this year, and we will take care of Zika. As a matter of fact, we’ll now start negotiations with the Senate. We had that vote today in the House of Representatives to begin what’s called a conference.

So we sit down with our colleagues in the Senate and come to a common agreement.

CORNISH: Oklahoma has had four Zika cases so far. These are all travel related. What are you hearing from your constituents? What are your concerns about that?

COLE: Well, the concerns are real. Sooner or later, we’re going to have a local outbreak – probably won’t have anything as massive as the affected countries because this mosquito isn’t as prevalent. But there’s certainly plenty of mosquitoes. And my constituents, I think, honestly have pretty good confidence when they’re not alarmed unduly by a lot of demagoguery that the government will do the right thing in the end.

And I think it will. It has – it certainly did in Ebola, it’s done in other outbreaks. But doing it prudently, using the money that you have, replacing it in future accounts that are not going to be spent for years seems like the wise thing to do.

CORNISH: Republican Congressman Tom Cole of Oklahoma, thank you for speaking with us.

COLE: Oh, thank you. It was my great pleasure.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

After Departure Of Uber, Lyft In Austin, New Companies Enter The Void

Earlier this month, voters in Austin, Texas, rejected an effort to overturn the city’s rules for ride-hailing companies. Uber and Lyft tried to prevent fingerprinting of their drivers, and now both have left town. A few other ride-share companies have popped up to help fill the void. NPR explores how people are getting around town without Uber and Lyft.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Austin, Texas, is known for its great bars and great music but not for its great public transportation. Up until recently, if you didn’t want to drink and drive in Austin, you took a ride-hailing service like Uber or Lyft. Now Uber and Lyft have left Austin after voters made fingerprinting a requirement for drivers. Audrey McGlinchy of member station KUT reports on how Austin residents are getting around.

(CROSSTALK)

AUDREY MCGLINCHY, BYLINE: Tom Atchity and his wife, Juliet, are sitting outside bar Cheer Up Charlie’s away from the noise of a three-band lineup. Atchity and his wife drove to the bar, but drinking and driving is always a concern, and Atchity tells me he would’ve taken an Uber or Lyft had one been available.

TOM ATCHITY: I certainly have kind of kept all of my going out and drinking very local – you know, within walking distance around our house. We’re lucky enough in Austin, at least in our neighborhood, that we can do that, but I definitely kind of changed our plans a couple times for it.

MCGLINCHY: Austin’s not known for its public transportation. Bus stops are infrequent and routes limited. A small number of cabs have trouble servicing the city, and wait times are notoriously long, and fares are high.

Without Uber and Lyft, newer ride-hailing companies are scrambling to fill the gap. Here at Cheer Up Charlie’s, only one of the nearly dozen people I approach has tried a new service. But all seem curious, both riders and drivers.

CARLTON THOMAS: I’m looking for the next four people that are interested Wingz, Wingz.

MCGLINCHY: Carlton Thomas is with the Austin Transportation Department, and he’s trying to connect former Uber and Lyft drivers with new companies at a city-run fair. Dana Lillard was there early – nearly an hour before the fair opened at 10 a.m. Lines were already long, confusion high.

DANA LILLARD: What do we do? You know, where do we go? How do we handle this?

LILLARD: I’m now in Lillard’s car with her in between pickups. She worked full-time for Uber and Lyft before they left town. Now she drives for Fare, one of the many newcomers. We stare at her phone, looking for a ride request to pop up. We sit, and we wait.

LILLARD: We’ve been sitting here for probably 10 minutes now, and no requests have popped up since I’ve been signed on to the app.

MCGLINCHY: Lillard discovers that her app was silent because of a technical glitch, and that’s characteristic of these ride-hailing newbies. Companies have jumped to fill the void, trying to scale up to the size of Uber and Lyft in a matter of weeks. Among them are Wingz, Get Me and Fasten plus a local effort called RideAustin.

But riders complain about long wait times or needing to schedule rides hours in advance. As a result, some have started soliciting rides on craigslist or a local Facebook group. Responding drivers post their now-defunct Uber or Lyft profiles, trying to create order in a city thrust into commuter chaos.

Back at the bar, Danielle Garza says she drove her car downtown, but she’s planning on having a few more drinks.

DANIELLE GARZA: I honestly, until this moment, haven’t really thought about how I’m going to get home. That’s a great question.

MCGLINCHY: I called Garza the next morning to see how she got home.

(SOUNDBITE OF RINGBACK TONE)

GARZA: Hello.

MCGLINCHY: Hey, is this Danielle?

Garza left the bar before midnight and hailed a cab on the street. But she says she called it an early night knowing a cab would be more available at that time. Will she try any of these new apps? Maybe, she says.

In the meantime, two more ride-hailing companies have arrived, and as riders grasp for a new service, these recent startups are also on the lookout for former Uber and Lyft customers. For NPR News, I’m Audrey McGlinchy in Austin.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Original 'Revenge of the Jedi' Teaser, 'X-Men' Parodies an '80s TV Classic and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

TV Show Parody of the Day:

Robin Leach takes part in the latest viral video promoting X-Men: Apocalypse, a parody of the 1980s reality show Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous:

Get an exclusive look at the home of the world’s prominent mutant expert – Professor Charles Xavier. #XMenApocalypsehttps://t.co/8YOJswH5ge

— X-Men Movies (@XMenMovies) May 25, 2016

Movie Comparison of the Day:

In honor of Alice Through the Looking Glass coming out this week, Couch Tomato shows 24 reasons Disney’s animated Alice in Wonderland is the same movie as The Hangover:

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

See Kirk, Spock, and Bones as if the Enterprise from Star Trek was an old sea ship instead of a spaceship:

Truly Awesome. If the #StarTrekTOS Crew Members were in 19th Century British/American Navy’s. pic.twitter.com/x6Y248OK1Z

— Pete Flower (@scifigeekpete) May 25, 2016

Supercut of the Day:

For Fandor Keyframe, Candice Drouet highlights paintings in movies in this supercut video essay:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

The following video by Jorge Luengo highlights Pedro Almodovar’s obsession with the color red:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Sir Ian McKellen, who turns 77 today, with Sandy Dennis in a promotional still for his big screen debut, A Touch of Love, in 1938:

Adorable Reimagined Movie of the Day:

The Pet Collective remade Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles with kittens playing the Turtles:

[embedded content]

Adorable Cosplay of the Day:

Earlier this week, a Star Wars themed “Pug Crawl” took place in Portland and it was the cutest thing ever. See more photos at Fashionably Geek.

Star Wars Fan Film of the Day:

Speaking of Star Wars fan stuffs, check out a cool aerial battle shot mostly from the POVs of the X-wing and TIE fighter pilots in “Attack of the Drones” (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today, on the 33rd anniversary of the release of Return of the Jedi, the Academy Film Archive unearthed and shared this early teaser for the Star Wars sequel, then titled Revenge of the Jedi:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

We Don't Know How Many Workers Are Injured At Slaughterhouses. Here's Why

Beef sides hang in a chilling room at a slaughterhouse in Nebraska.

Beef sides hang in a chilling room at a slaughterhouse in Nebraska. Nati Harnik/AP hide caption

toggle caption Nati Harnik/AP

A slaughterhouse is a safer place to work than it used to be, according to a new government report. But data gathered by federal regulators doesn’t likely capture all the risks faced by meat and poultry workers.

In an update to a 2005 report criticizing safety conditions for workers in the meat industry, the Government Accountability Office says injuries and illnesses are still common. From 2004 to 2013, 151 meat and poultry workers died from injuries sustained at work. The injury rate for meat workers is higher than the rest of the manufacturing industry.

But injuries in the meat industry are also likely to be underreported.

The GAO found several situations that may keep reported numbers from packing plants lower than reality. Here are some examples:

  • Sanitary workers who clean machinery in meat plants have suffered amputated limbs and severed fingers. Some have died on the job. But their cases are not always counted with meat and poultry industry data because many work for third-party contractors.
  • Medical staff at on-site clinics have encouraged workers to return to the line without seeing a doctor for pain. GAO cited a case where a worker made 90 visits to a nursing station before being referred to a physician.
  • Meat and poultry workers are often immigrants or refugees. They may downplay or not report injuries to protect their jobs and livelihoods. Language barriers can also prevent workers from receiving proper safety training.

“These limitations in [the Department of Labor’s] data collection raise questions about whether the federal government is doing all it can to collect the data it needs to support worker protection and workplace safety,” the GAO report said.

The GAO says safety researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should do more to study sanitation worker injuries and regulators should count those injuries alongside those sustained by other meat workers.

Worker advocates say they have long been suspicious of the injury rates reported by meat companies. For instance, a recent study at a Maryland poultry plant by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that one-third of workers had injuries that meet the definition of carpal tunnel, but only a handful of injuries had been reported to OSHA.

When injuries aren’t reported and treated, advocates say, they get worse.

“It has profound consequences for the workers,” says Celeste Monforton, an occupational health researcher at George Washington University. “Their injuries are exacerbated, some beyond repair.”

In recent years, groups like Nebraska Appleseed and the Southern Poverty Law Center have highlighted working conditions that they say continue to put people at risk, such as fast line speeds that can cause repetitive motion injuries. And Oxfam found that poultry workers are often denied mandatory bathroom breaks during the workday. Workers said they ended up wearing adult diapers.

The North American Meat Institute, a trade group, issued a statement defending the meat industry’s record on worker safety record. It said that OSHA has reviewed injury recordkeeping and did not find underreporting to be a regular problem at meatpacking facilities. NAMI also said that the rate of reported injuries is at an all-time low.

In an interview before the report was released, NAMI safety director Dan McCausland said the meat industry has made strides in safety over the last few decades.

“If you go back to the late 80s, early 90s – particularly in slaughtering facilities – it was not uncommon to have a third of the employees have an injury significant enough to wind up on the OSHA 300 log every year,” McCausland said, referring to the OSHA form used to report workplace injuries. “Now it’s down in the 10 percent and below [range]. We have many facilities running 3 percent or less.”

McCausland says the industry continues to look for ways to automate packing plants to take some of the load off of workers’ shoulders.

This story comes to us from Harvest Public Media, a reporting collaboration focused on food and agriculture.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Sports Commentary: Russia Clinches Gold Medal For Cheating

If Russian athletes are allowed to compete in Rio without proper vetting of doping allegations, it’ll be history repeating itself when Soviet athletes were suspected of doping in the 1970s and ’80s.

Transcript

RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:

The Olympics are coming up. And if there were a gold medal for the country that has the most performance-enhanced athletes, commentator Christine Brennan knows which one she’d present it to.

CHRISTINE BRENNAN, BYLINE: The facts and allegations have taken on the rhythm of an almost daily drumbeat marching towards this summer’s Rio Olympic Games. Have Russia’s Olympic sports already clinched the gold medal for cheating? The world track and field association thinks so. They banned Russia’s track and field athletes last November over widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs. There’s one last meeting in June to decide whether they stay suspended or are allowed back in time for Rio.

Detailed allegations of massive state-sponsored cheating during the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi led many of us to wonder – if the Russian’s rigged winter sports, why would they stop there? Why not the summer sports too? If news reports are true, at Sochi, tamper-proof containers were opened in the middle of the night to switch urine samples for Russian athletes, allowing cheaters who should have been caught to instead win medals and allowing Russia to win the overall medal count at those Winter Olympics. An intense investigation is underway to find out if Vladimir Putin’s big Russian coming-out party was simply one massive charade.

Meanwhile, perhaps you’ve heard of meldonium. That’s the heart medication tennis star Maria Sharapova and so many other young, healthy Russian athletes were taking for years, a medication with the wonderful side effect of increasing one’s endurance. It wasn’t banned before January 1, but it is now, meaning that until this year, Russian athletes have been using a performance-enhancing drug for years with no punishment. Russian officials have apologized and say they have cleaned up their act. One actually said a mouse would not be able to slip past us now. We’re not so sure about a mouse on steroids, though.

The natural reaction of any fan is to notice a pattern here and want to kick the bums out as a kind of lifetime achievement award. Problem is – time is running out to investigate the Russians. It took the doping police several years to catch Lance Armstrong, and he was just one person. How do you investigate an entire nation of athletes in a couple of months? And does the International Olympic Committee really want to kick out its pal Putin after he dropped $51 billion to put on the Winter Games two years ago? And what about the sponsors – or the TV networks? USA-Russian Olympic showdowns still draw big ratings.

That said, it will be an outrage if cheating athletes are allowed to compete in Rio. It will also be historic, as in history repeating itself. Back in the 1970s and ’80s, the Russians were called the Soviet Union. They ran an extensive doping program. And they had accomplices, the East Germans. Neither of those countries survived the end of the Cold War, but the cheating apparently did.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Online Eye Exam Site Makes Waves In Eye Care Industry

A startup called Opternative offers online vision tests using a computer and a smartphone.

A startup called Opternative offers online vision tests using a computer and a smartphone. Coutesy of Opternative hide caption

toggle caption Coutesy of Opternative

All sorts of health information is now a few taps away on your smartphone, from how many steps you take — to how well you sleep at night. But what if you could use your phone and a computer to test your vision? A company is doing just that — and eye care professionals are upset. Some states have even banned it.

A Chicago-based company called Opternative offers the test. The site asks some questions about your eyes and overall health; it also wants to know your shoe size to make sure you’re the right distance from your computer monitor. You keep your smartphone in your hand and use the Web browser to answer questions about what you see on the computer screen.

Like a traditional eye test, there are shapes, lines and letters. It takes about 30 minutes.

“We’re trying to identify how bad your vision is, so we’re kind of testing your vision to failure, is the way I would describe it,” says Aaron Dallek, CEO of Opternative.

Dallek co-founded the company with an optometrist, who was searching for ways to offer eye exams online.

“Me being a lifetime glasses and contact wearer, I was like ‘Where do we start?’ So, that was about 3 1/2 years ago, and we’ve been working on it ever since,” Dallek says.

He says 65,000 patients have signed up for the test. It’s free but costs $40 to have a doctor in the person’s home state review the online results and email a prescription for glasses or contacts.

Eye care professionals, like Atlanta optometrist Minty Nguyen, have concerns. She took the test and likes that it asks patients health questions. But she says there’s no substitute for going to an eye doctor.

“And again, it’s not for me to make any more money as an optometrist. It just kind of encourages patients to neglect the health portion of their exam, which is key,” she says. “You don’t want to go blind. It’s one of your most important senses.”

Eye health exams look for problems like glaucoma and cataracts.

Opternative is available in at least 34 states. But the company is under scrutiny. This year, Indiana outlawed the test and Michigan sent the company a cease-and-desist order.

Earlier this month, Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal signed a law to ban the test here. The sponsor, state Rep. Earl Ehrhart, ridiculed Opternative while speaking to a House committee.

“They’re required to use their computer and measure a certain distance away from their computer using their shoe. That’s why the company claims for the exam to be accurate. That’s fairly difficult to believe,” he said. “I think our trained optometric doctors under their current protocols and our ophthalmologists go a little bit further than the shoe standard.”

Dallek says the company was never meant to replace a full eye exam. But he says state lawmakers shouldn’t decide who gets to take medical tests.

“We recommend patients get a comprehensive eye health exam every two years, and for some people maybe they choose to get it less often, but that’s their choice. That’s part of the free market, for patients to be able to kind of choose what’s best for them,” he says.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology says the test may be suitable for 18- to 39-year-olds who just want to update their prescription, but only as a complement to regular visits with an eye doctor.

The American Optometric Association has asked the Food and Drug Administration to pull Opternative off the market.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)