Articles by admin

No Image

Planned Parenthood Sues To Block Trump's 'Radical Shift' In Family Planning Program

President Trump shakes hands with Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar after he is sworn in by Vice President Pence on Jan. 29. Major reproductive health organizations are voicing concerns about the Trump administration’s new approach to federal family-planning grants, which may reduce the role of Planned Parenthood and place greater emphasis on “natural family planning.”

Andrew Harnik/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/AP

Updated at 11:50 a.m. ET

Three national reproductive rights groups are suing the Trump administration, arguing that changes to the federal Title X program will put the health of millions of low-income patients at risk by prioritizing practices such as the rhythm method over comprehensive sexual health services.

The two lawsuits filed Wednesday — one by about the state budget here: https://t.co/GAD5jYtjpA

— Gov. Pete Ricketts (@GovRicketts) April 4, 2018

Texas: Revisiting federal funding — without Planned Parenthood in the mix

Under the Obama administration, Texas was excluded from receiving Title X family planning funds because of the state’s ban on public funds going to organizations that provide abortions. Now, Texas officials see an opportunity to recapture that funding while maintaining that prohibition.

In March, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote a letter to HHS Secretary Alex Azar asking the state to be allowed to receive those funds under the Trump administration:

“In light of the recent statements by … President Trump,” Paxton wrote, “… and communications that Texas officials had with members of your agency last Fall, Texans are encouraged that cooperative participation to accomplish the objectives of the Title X program, is yet again possible.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Turkish Soccer Fan Won't Let A Ban Stop Him

A soccer fan in Turkey was banned from his local stadium for a year. So he hired a crane to sit and watch the game from above the stands. Police made him take it down.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

Good morning. I’m Steve Inskeep. A Turkish soccer fan apparently loved his team a little too much. The man, named Ali, was ejected from the stadium of his favorite team for some undisclosed misbehavior. Police made him sign a paper saying he would not return. But refusing to miss the game, he hired a crane and watched from over the bleachers. Police finally ordered him down. You can take the fan out of the stadium, but you can’t take the stadium far enough away from the fan. It’s MORNING EDITION.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Fan-Made Live-Action 'Teen Titans' Trailer, 'Cobra Kai' Prank Promo and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Fake Trailer of the Day:

Just in time to coincide with the new real Teen Titans Go! To the Moviie trailer, here’s a fan-made trailer from StryderHD for a live-action Teen Titans movie:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Jeff Goldblum always finds the best Thor: Ragnarok cosplayers, but this time he’s found the most adorable:

Most adorable cosplay I saw online from Calgary Expo this past weekend. (Photo https://t.co/zbzKoDuGyj ) pic.twitter.com/yvdv0gQSO3

— Cosplay in America (@cosplayamerica) May 1, 2018

VFX Breakdown of the Day:

Speaking of Marvel movies, this Avengers: Infinity War featurette via We Got This Covered spotlights the movie’s visual effects producers as they discuss their arduous CG character work:

[embedded content]

Easter Eggs of the Day:

Avengers: Infinity War is so epic, it warrants us sharing another highlight of the movie’s Easter eggs and other secrets:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

John Woo, who turns 72 today, discusses a scene with John Travolta and Nicolas Cage on the set of the 1997 movie Face/Off:

Promotional Prank of the Day:

YouTube Red shock pranked New Yorkers as a promo for its Karate Kid sequel series Cobra Kai with a staged confrontation:

[embedded content]

Fan Theory of the Day:

In the latest edition of Film Theory, MatPat impressively deduces where Neverland from Peter Pan is geographically located and what actual island it represents:

[embedded content]

Video Essay of the Day:

The latest video essay from The Renegade Cut looks at Bong joon-ho’s The Host and how its monster represents America:

[embedded content]

Weird Fake Movie of the Day:

Screen Junkies got an AI to write the latest Honest Trailer, which resulted in one very surreal fake movie being advertised:

[embedded content]

Classic Movie Clip of the Day:

This week is the 15th anniversary of the release of X-Men 2 (aka X2), so here’s a look back at one of the superhero sequel’s most iconic moments:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

States Sue The EPA To Protect Obama-Era Fuel Efficiency Standards

Vehicles pass during the afternoon commute on Highway 101 in Los Angeles on April 2. California is suing the EPA over a plan to revise fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, weakening Obama-era limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Mario Tama/Getty Images

A coalition of 17 states and the District of Columbia, led by California, is suing the Environmental Protection Agency over its plan to change vehicle efficiency standards. The states are asking a court to review the EPA’s proposed actions, arguing that they violate the Clean Air Act.

“We’re not looking to pick a fight with the Trump administration, but when the stakes are this high for our families’ health and our economic prosperity, we have a responsibility to do what is necessary to defend them,” California’s attorney general, Xavier Becerra, said.

In a news release, the states said their lawsuit “seeks to set aside and hold unlawful the EPA’s effort to weaken the nation’s existing clean car rules … based on the fact that the EPA acted arbitrarily and capriciously, failed to follow its own regulations, and violated the Clean Air Act.”

Specifically, the EPA is reconsidering Obama-era rules designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from cars. The regulations call for average fuel efficiency to increase to 54.5 mpg by 2025. EPA head Scott Pruitt said the current standards “may be too stringent,” and has initiated the process of rewriting them.

In its announcement last month, the EPA said that the ambitious Obama-era standards present “challenges to auto manufacturers” and impose extra costs on consumers.

Today, we announced @EPA plans to roll back Obama Admin fuel standards. These standards were inappropriate & needed to be revised. The focus should be on providing consumer choice and the strongest environmental protections.

Catch the full event here?? https://t.co/2LPgSu5iXOpic.twitter.com/rbqixkEhK5

— Administrator Pruitt (@EPAScottPruitt) April 3, 2018

In response Consumers Union, the advocacy division of Consumer Reports,said that efficiency standards actually save consumers money.

And a report released by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law said the EPA’s reasoning was “not grounded in fact.” For instance, the EPA says lower gas prices are making fuel-efficient cars less attractive, and cites flagging demand for electric cars as a sign the current standards are unrealistic. However, the report notes, “both fuel prices and electric vehicle sales are in fact rising.”

The legal battle between California and the EPA ultimatelycould lead to two competing emissions standards — one for California and the states that follow it, and another for the rest of the country. That’s an outcome automakers would prefer to avoid.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

When Inmates Need A Specialist, They Often See The Doctor By Video

Telemedicine is making it easier for inmates to be seen for special medical needs, like cancer or cardiac care.

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News

hide caption

toggle caption

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News

When an inmate needs to see a medical specialist, getting that care can be complicated.

Prisons are often located in rural areas far from medical centers that have experts in cancer, heart and other disease treatments. Even if the visit just involves a trip to a hospital across town, the inmate must be transported under guard, often in shackles.

The whole process is expensive for the correctional facility and time-consuming for the patient.

Given the challenges, it’s no wonder many correctional facilities have embraced telemedicine. They use video conferencing to allow inmates to see medical specialists and psychiatrists without ever leaving the facility.

A survey by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of prison health care in 2011 found that 30 states out of 45 that responded said they used telemedicine for at least one type of specialty or diagnostic service. The participating states reported that telemedicine was most commonly used for psychiatry (62.2 percent) and cardiology (26.6 percent), according to the research, which was published in 2016.

Among the corrections facilities offering these services is Rikers Island, which houses nine jails on an island near LaGuardia Airport in New York City. It recently began to provide telehealth services for female inmates who need oncology, rheumatology and hematology services. Other specialties are expected to be added in the future.

Male inmates on Rikers have been receiving telehealth services since 2016. Roughly 40 inmates have virtual visits each month with specialists in those same areas as well as infectious disease, urology, dermatology, pulmonology and gastroenterology.

“Initially we implemented [telehealth] for the efficiency part, to avoid hours of transport,” says Dr. Ross MacDonald, chief medical officer for NYC Health + Hospitals/Correctional Health Services, which runs the health care services at Rikers. “But what we’ve learned over time is that it really improves clinical care.” Telehealth allows the referring physician at the jail to consult with the specialist at the hospital as a team, and together clarify information for the patient, MacDonald says.

When the jail’s primary care provider identifies a medical concern that requires a specialist’s attention, the provider will accompany the patient to the jail’s medical clinic and together they’ll consult with a specialist at NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst in Queens who is visible on the monitor. If the patient’s vital signs need to be checked or if she needs other tests, the primary care provider can handle that and communicate results with the specialist.

If after that meeting, a face-to-face exam with the specialist is necessary, that would be scheduled, MacDonald says.

“This is not meant to replace in-person visits, it’s meant to complement them,” he says.

Still, some prisoner advocates worry about the increasing use of telemedicine. Khalil Cumberbatch says he’s concerned that the video visits may heighten inmates’ feelings of isolation. Cumberbatch spent nearly a year on Rikers Island, first as he awaited trial on first-degree robbery charges in the early 2000s and later when he appealed his conviction.

He now works as the associate vice president of policy at the Fortune Society, a nonprofit organization that supports efforts to help prisoners re-enter society after incarceration.

“You’re removing contact with the outside world,” he says. “There’s a level of engagement that can be lost when you’re doing it on the screen.”

But for sick prisoners, that may not be a priority, others say.

“Lots of them don’t want to go to the outside facility,” says Dr. Edward Levine, the medical director for prison care for Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, which has been doing telemedicine with the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction since 1995. “These people are sick. They have to get on a bus, it’s bumpy, and there are delays, and if [they’re] not feeling well, they don’t like it.”

Levine estimates he sees up to 150 gastroenterology patients a year at Ohio’s 29 prisons through telemedicine visits. “You develop a relationship with them the same as you would if you saw them in a clinic,” he says.

Although inmates may owe copayments if they see a doctor or nurse for run-of-the-mill aches and pains, they won’t generally have to pay for specialty care, whether provided on-site or through telemedicine, says Dr. Anne Spaulding, an epidemiologist and associate professor at Emory University’s public health school in Atlanta who has worked as a medical director in corrections. That’s because a medical provider typically initiates specialty care. Inmates are more commonly charged for medical visits that they initiate, she says.

Telemedicine can improve continuity of care and help patients keep chronic conditions under control. In one study of HIV-infected adults incarcerated at Illinois Department of Corrections facilities, 91 percent of telemedicine patients achieved complete suppression of the virus during the first six visits, compared with 59 percent of patients who received standard care on-site at the facilities. The study credited the results to having specialists provide evidence-based, up-to-date care through telemedicine, rather than relying on primary care physicians at the correctional facilities.

“If we can see them in real time without having to leave the facility, we get better outcomes,” says Dr. Jeremy Young, an infectious-disease specialist and associate professor of medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who was the lead author of the study.


Kaiser Health Newsis a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation which is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.Follow Michelle Andrews on Twitter: @mandrews110.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

At 70, Smithsonian Folkways Is An Antidote To Music Algorithms

Woody Guthrie playing his guitar, Ca. 1960s.

John Springer Collection/Corbis via Getty Images

From the sounds of blues guitarist and singer Lead Belly to recordings of Southwestern Woodhouse Toads, Smithsonian Folkways has been capturing the sounds of global history for the past 70 years. These recordings are among 60,000 treasured tracks the label has in its library — and it promises they’ll never go out of print — from the labor songs of Woody Guthrie and children’s songs of Ella Jenkins to New Orleans hot jazz, songs of the civil rights movement, the Honk Horn music of Ghana and so much more.

The label was officially started on May Day 1948, so its current director and curator, Huib Schippers, joins us to look back and celebrate this National Treasure’s rich history, starting with its founder Moses Asch.

Below you’ll find the Smithsonian Folkways’ own honorary 70-year playlist: 70 recordings from their vast catalog. You can read more about their rich history through 70 Years, 70 Stories.

[embedded content]

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Avengers: Infinity War' Easter Eggs, 'Se7en' Remade for Kids and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Cosplay of the Day:

Nobody is more excited about the record box office success of Avengers: Infinity War than these guys:

Avengers cosplay. pic.twitter.com/Q3ZSUuzIhD

— Guys Stuff (@guystufff) April 27, 2018

Easter Eggs of the Day:

You all have seen Avengers: Infinity War, maybe multiple times, now see if you spotted all its Easter eggs and cameos via the latest humorous Mr. Sunday Movies guide:

[embedded content]

Remade Movie Scenes of the Day:

Now that you’ve seen Infinity War, revisit Avengers: Age of Ultron but in Lego form via Brick Force Studios:

[embedded content]

Reworked Movie of the Day:

David Fincher’s Se7en is a brutally violent thriller, but FBE managed to turn it into a G-rated movie:

[embedded content]

Movie-Inspired Song of the Day:

Star Wars may have lost its box office crown, but it wins best movie-inspired song of the week with this Return of the Jedi-based tune by Auralnauts (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Cloris Leachman, who turns 92 today, poses with co-star Ralph Meeker for a promotional photo for her breakout movie, 1955’s Kiss Me Deadly:

Filmmaker in Focus:

In his latest video essay Rob Ager looks at how Stanely Kubrick embraced abstract filmmaking, particularly with Dr. Strangelove:

[embedded content]

Video Essay of the Day:

The latest video essay from Rossatron explores the importance of blood in movies:

[embedded content]

Fan Theory of the Day:

Is Jigsaw from the Saw movies actually Kevin McCallister from Home Alone grown up? WhatCulture explores the possibility:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 60th anniversary of the release of Arthur Penn’s The Left Handed Gun starring Paul Newman. Watch the original trailer for the classic Western below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Trump Administration Delays Most Tariffs On Steel, Aluminum

Steel coils sit on wagons leaving a factory in Duisburg, Germany on March 2. U.S. President Trump Monday decided to hold off on imposing most steel and aluminum tariffs until at least June 1.

Martin Meissner/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Martin Meissner/AP

The Trump administration has decided to hold off on imposing most of its tariffs on imported steel and aluminum until at least June 1.

Tariffs were scheduled to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday on imports from Canada, the largest U.S. supplier of steel and aluminum, as well as Mexico, Argentina, Australia, Brazil and the EU.

A source familiar with the decision says the administration has reached an agreement in principle with Australia, Argentina and Brazil, which may avoid the need for tariffs against those countries altogether.

Talks continue with Canada, Mexico and the EU.

Trump initially ordered the tariffs — 25 percent on imported steel and 10 percent on imported aluminum — in March, ostensibly to protect domestic industries, which the president called critical to national security.

But before the levies took effect, the administration granted temporary waivers to most major U.S. allies.

In recent weeks, Trump has used the tariffs — or the threat of tariffs — as a bargaining chip in broader trade negotiations.

Mexico and Canada are in talks with the U.S. on a revised North American Free Trade Agreement.

South Korean officials won a permanent exemption from steel tariffs in March as part of an updated free trade agreement with the U.S. But in exchange, South Korea had to reduce its steel exports to the U.S. by about 30 percent, Similar quotas could be imposed on other countries as part of a final deal.

Japan never got a break from the tariffs, so Japanese exporters have been subject to the levies since late March. That was a source of some friction when Trump hosted Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago.

The EU had threatened to retaliate if the steel and aluminum tariffs took effect, by imposing levies of its own on politically sensitive American exports. Potential targets include Harley Davidson motorcycles, from the home state of House Speaker Paul Ryan, and Kentucky bourbon, which could get the attention of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

The steel and aluminum tariffs are part of a broader effort to crack down on what Trump calls unfair trading practices. The administration has also imposed tariffs on imported solar panels and washing machines. And it’s threatening hefty penalties against a wide range of exports from China.

A U.S. delegation is on its way to Beijing for trade talks later this week.

“You see what’s happening with respect to trade and the United States,” Trump said Monday. “We are being respected again.”

Economists have warned that tariffs could backfire, by raising prices for U.S. businesses and consumers and sparking a backlash against American exports.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

IAAF Creates Rule To Ban Women With Naturally High Testosterone Levels From Competition

Last week, the International Association of Athletics Federations issued a new rule that bans women with naturally high testosterone levels from competing unless they medically reduce their testosterone levels. NPR’s Audie Cornish talks about the new rule with bioethicist Katrina Karkazis.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Female athletes who compete in track and field may once again have to watch their testosterone levels. The International Association of Athletics Federations has issued a new rule that bans women with naturally high testosterone levels from competing unless they agree to take medication. Now, the new rule applies specifically to track events from 400 meters up to one mile. It’s expected to take effect in November. And it’s drawn a lot of criticism, including from Katrina Karkazis. She’s a bioethicist and visiting senior fellow at Yale’s Global Health Justice Partnership.

Welcome to the program.

KATRINA KARKAZIS: Thank you for having me.

CORNISH: Now, I understand the last time the IAAF tried to pass a rule like this, it was struck down essentially because the court said, you guys haven’t proved that higher testosterone levels actually gives these athletes an advantage. So has something changed here?

KARKAZIS: Something did change. Where that case left off is that there was a two-year suspension of the regulation pending sufficient evidence because the court said there wasn’t enough. Instead of return with the evidence for a regulation that would apply to all track and field events, the IAAF came back with a regulation that would only apply to a select few. Because the athlete I worked with doesn’t run in those events, she doesn’t have a case anymore.

So the case closed, and now the burden once again is on an athlete to bring a case to challenge this regulation.

CORNISH: What are the ethical complications that come from a regulation like this?

KARKAZIS: Well, I think the primary ethical concern is that women are being asked to undergo medically unnecessary interventions in order to continue competing. And these are not benign interventions. You don’t lower testosterone in women simply because it’s high. So that creates a problem, and I don’t think that any woman should be asked to do that. And that was one of Dutee Chand’s chief complaints and why she challenged the regulation.

CORNISH: And Dutee Chand is the Indian sprinter who successfully challenged this ban, preventing her from competing in 2015. Meanwhile, the African National Congress has called the new policy racist, saying that it’s directed at the South African runner Caster Semenya. What do you think is the basis for this claim? Do you agree with it?

KARKAZIS: I absolutely do. I think Caster Semenya is the target here. She’s been a target, actually, of the IAAF since 2009 when she was first investigated at Berlin world championships. So for the better part of 10 years, the IAAF has been constructing regulations that would, in effect, remove her from competition. And I think that’s where we’re at again. It’s a policy that primarily affects black and brown women from the Global South at this moment in history.

CORNISH: The IAAF has essentially said, look, we’re not asking people to undergo any kind of surgery. They can compete in other events or they can compete with men. Why aren’t those alternatives fair to you?

KARKAZIS: Because to me, they’re impossible choices. And I think that they really underestimate the impact and really the insulting nature of those kinds of suggestions. The idea that you would tell a woman that she could go compete with men is – I mean, it’s just preposterous. And no matter what, if you change your event or you choose to quit, which some women have, or you lower your testosterone, all of that in one way or another can effectively be the end of your career. So they’re false choices in my mind.

And they’re the kinds of choices that take a physical toll but also a psychic toll to be told you’re not who you say you are.

CORNISH: That’s Katrina Karkazis. She’s a bioethicist and visiting senior fellow at Yale’s Global Health Justice Partnership. Thank you for speaking with ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

KARKAZIS: Thank you so much.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Comedian's Controversial Performance At D.C. Gala Prompts Renewed Criticism

Saturday night’s White House Correspondents Dinner featured a controversial performance by comedian Michelle Wolf, prompting renewed criticism of the annual event.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Even in the supposedly freewheeling times, comedy and comedians still occasionally make news, and we have a couple of stories about that. And we’ll start with last night’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where comedian Michelle Wolf delivered a performance that took aim at the president, many of his aides and, of course, her hosts, the media.

(SOUNDBITE OF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER)

MICHELLE WOLF: You guys are obsessed with Trump. Did you used to date him? Because you pretend like you hate him, but I think you love him.

MARTIN: Here’s NPR’s media correspondent David Folkenflik now to talk about the dinner and why some people are apparently upset. David. Thanks so much for joining us.

DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE: Great to join you.

MARTIN: So, David, lots of comedians have been criticized for their performances at this dinner and other dinners over the years. Was there something different about this one?

FOLKENFLIK: Well, I think a lot of people focused on Michelle Wolf’s comments particularly about Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who, in the absence of the president in some ways, was one of the leading figures and representatives of the Trump administration who came. Last year, you may recall, all the staffers boycotted in honor of the president, declaring that the whole thing was an affront to him. This time, he encouraged them to go. She was there. And some of the barbs were quite pointed and quite personal. So I think a lot of conservatives and Trump fans looked at that and said, oh, this is beyond the pale.

MARTIN: Here’s an example of one of the jokes that apparently did not sit well. Here it is.

(SOUNDBITE OF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER)

WOLF: And I’m never really sure what to call Sarah Huckabee Sanders. You know, is it Sarah Sanders? Is it Sarah Huckabee Sanders? Is it Cousin Huckabee? Is it Auntie Huckabee Sanders? Like, what’s Uncle Tom but for white women who disappoint other white women? Oh, I know, Aunt Coulter.

MARTIN: Well, so you can hear some of the audience reaction in the background. As it has to be said, that is a very large dinner. There are thousands of people in that room. So what is the argument about? What exactly was beyond the pale?

FOLKENFLIK: The argument is that Michelle Wolf is using Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a woman, and taking her down on the basis, in some ways, of her gender and the role that she plays in a way that wouldn’t be done to a man. You know, the accusation is that Michelle Wolf is behaving like a political comedian in a comedy room but instead, you know, in our living rooms because this is a televised thing.

And in some ways, the tension inherent every year is that the White House Correspondents’ Association wants this to be a lively and sort of, in quotes, “outrageous” event so that people pay attention and so that it’s a great gala and they can get, you know, celebrity guests. And they can raise money for their scholarships and hail the First Amendment and the hard work that people do. But in so doing, they often attract people who are genuinely outrageous and genuinely make pointed barbs, not barbs that are carefully sanded on the edges.

You know, I remember when Don Imus pointed barbs at then-President Clinton. I was there when President George W. Bush was satirized. I wasn’t there when Stephen Colbert did his infamous and quite wonderful approach in 2006. I watched it on TV. But that is the one that I thought was most effective. And surprisingly, that’s the one that people in the room took most affront to.

MARTIN: Well, the elephant in the room here though, David, is that the president has his own record of making vulgar comments and personally attacking people in public venues that are also televised and which his supporters have heartily defended. For example, a conservative commentator, Ana Navarro, posted a picture on Twitter of a couple with a Trump T-shirt with a vulgarity saying – basically dismissing your feelings. Basically, your feelings are not of interest. And there’s a vulgarity that we don’t use. So the question then becomes is what is the standard here?

FOLKENFLIK: I mean, look. I would call it an irony, but it’s an abject hypocrisy if you think about what the president has said about his female critics, whether, you know, former Secretary of State Clinton, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, many other women – Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC, you name it. The things that the president has said have been far more personalized, far more vulgar, far more hostile, in some ways just, you know, definitionally (ph) sexist. There’s just a deep disingenuousness about the degree to which people decide to take offense at this given the nature of the discourse we’ve had in the last several years, much of it from the mouth of the president himself.

MARTIN: That’s NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik. David, thank you.

FOLKENFLIK: You bet.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)