{"id":8139,"date":"2016-06-29T12:32:00","date_gmt":"2016-06-29T20:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-redo-of-human-research-rules\/"},"modified":"2016-06-29T12:32:00","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T20:32:00","slug":"heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-redo-of-human-research-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-redo-of-human-research-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Heat On White House To Scrap Redo Of Human Research Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-style:italic;font-size:16px\">By  <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2016\/06\/29\/483896501\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-rewrite-of-human-research-rules?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=healthcare\">Rob Stein<\/a><\/span>  <\/p>\n<div class=\"ftpimagefix\" style=\"float:left\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2016\/06\/29\/483896501\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-rewrite-of-human-research-rules?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=healthcare\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2016\/06\/29\/hela-cells-4527b37fcc24c6c011355136652f307b48090f02-s1100-c15.jpg\" title=\"HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission.\" alt=\"HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission.\"><\/a><\/div>\n<div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission. <strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencesource.com\/\">Science Source<\/a><\/strong> <strong>hide caption<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>toggle caption<\/strong> <span><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencesource.com\/\">Science Source<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>An influential federal panel has taken the unusual step of telling the Obama administration to withdraw a controversial proposal to revise regulations that protect people who volunteer for medical research.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal is &#8220;marred by omissions, the absence of essential elements, and a lack of clarity,&#8221; according to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The conclusions are part of a 283-page <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nap.edu\/catalog\/21824\/optimizing-the-nations-investment-in-academic-research-a-new-regulatory\">report<\/a> released Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>The regulations are known collectively as the Common Rule. They were put in place decades ago to make sure medical experiments are conducted ethically.<\/p>\n<p>But the rules haven&#8217;t been updated in nearly a quarter century. So last year the Department of Health and Human Services <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/education\/training\/nprmwebinars.html\">proposed<\/a> a major revision.<\/p>\n<p>But the proposal prompted a wide range of <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2015\/11\/25\/456496612\/a-controversial-rewrite-for-rules-to-protect-humans-in-experiments\">criticism<\/a>. Some argued the revisions were too vague, complex and confusing. Others attacked specific changes.<\/p>\n<p>One especially contentious requirement would oblige scientists to obtain explicit consent from patients before using their blood or tissue for research.<\/p>\n<p>The requirement aims to prevent a repeat of what happened to <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lacksfamily.net\/\">Henrietta Lacks<\/a>. She was an African-American woman who died of cervical cancer in 1951. Tumor cells taken from her were used without her consent to produce a research cell line that has been kept alive in labs around the world ever since.<\/p>\n<p>But many researchers feared the new requirement would create unnecessary red tape and significantly hinder important research.<\/p>\n<p>The academies report appears to agree. It concludes that &#8220;much of this research does not involve physical risk to participants; rather, risks are limited to the more remote possibility of informational harm resulting from the inadvertent release of confidential information.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The report recommends that the proposal be withdrawn. Instead, it says the president should appoint an <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/bioethics.gov\/history\">independent national commission<\/a> modeled on the President&#8217;s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical And Behavioral Research to essentially start from scratch in revising the regulations.<\/p>\n<p>HHS says it is reviewing the report, along with more than 2,100 public comments on the proposed revision.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/\">Let&#8217;s block ads!<\/a><\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/fivefilters\/block-ads\/wiki\/There-are-no-acceptable-ads\">(Why?)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source:: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2016\/06\/29\/483896501\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-rewrite-of-human-research-rules?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=healthcare\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Heat On White House To Scrap Redo Of Human Research Rules\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2016\/06\/29\/483896501\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-rewrite-of-human-research-rules?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=healthcare<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ftpimagefix\" style=\"float:left\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2016\/06\/29\/483896501\/heat-on-white-house-to-scrap-rewrite-of-human-research-rules?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=healthcare\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2016\/06\/29\/hela-cells-4527b37fcc24c6c011355136652f307b48090f02-s1100-c15.jpg\" title=\"HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission.\" alt=\"HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission.\"><\/a><\/div>\n<div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission. <strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencesource.com\/\">Science Source<\/a><\/strong> <strong>hide caption<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>toggle caption<\/strong> <span><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencesource.com\/\">Science Source<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>An influential federal panel has taken the unusual step of telling the Obama administration to withdraw a controversial proposal to revise regulations that protect people who volunteer for medical research.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal is &#8220;marred by omissions, the absence of essential elements, and a lack of clarity,&#8221; according to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The conclusions are part of a 283-page <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nap.edu\/catalog\/21824\/optimizing-the-nations-investment-in-academic-research-a-new-regulatory\">report<\/a> released Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>The regulations are known collectively as the Common Rule. They were put in place decades ago to make sure medical experiments are conducted ethically.<\/p>\n<p>But the rules haven&#8217;t been updated in nearly a quarter century. So last year the Department of Health and Human Services <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/education\/training\/nprmwebinars.html\">proposed<\/a> a major revision.<\/p>\n<p>But the proposal prompted a wide range of <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2015\/11\/25\/456496612\/a-controversial-rewrite-for-rules-to-protect-humans-in-experiments\">criticism<\/a>. Some argued the revisions were too vague, complex and confusing. Others attacked specific changes.<\/p>\n<p>One especially contentious requirement would oblige scientists to obtain explicit consent from patients before using their blood or tissue for research.<\/p>\n<p>The requirement aims to prevent a repeat of what happened to <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lacksfamily.net\/\">Henrietta Lacks<\/a>. She was an African-American woman who died of cervical cancer in 1951. Tumor cells taken from her were used without her consent to produce a research cell line that has been kept alive in labs around the world ever since.<\/p>\n<p>But many researchers feared the new requirement would create unnecessary red tape and significantly hinder important research.<\/p>\n<p>The academies report appears to agree. It concludes that &#8220;much of this research does not involve physical risk to participants; rather, risks are limited to the more remote possibility of informational harm resulting from the inadvertent release of confidential information.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The report recommends that the proposal be withdrawn. Instead, it says the president should appoint an <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/bioethics.gov\/history\">independent national commission<\/a> modeled on the President&#8217;s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical And Behavioral Research to essentially start from scratch in revising the regulations.<\/p>\n<p>HHS says it is reviewing the report, along with more than 2,100 public comments on the proposed revision.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/\">Let&#8217;s block ads!<\/a><\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/fivefilters\/block-ads\/wiki\/There-are-no-acceptable-ads\">(Why?)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}