{"id":19255,"date":"2019-05-12T23:39:50","date_gmt":"2019-05-13T07:39:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china\/"},"modified":"2019-05-12T23:39:50","modified_gmt":"2019-05-13T07:39:50","slug":"trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Administration Ratchets Up Tariffs, So Far Without Retaliation From China"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-style:italic;font-size:16px\">By  <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/13\/722710640\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=business\" rel=\"nofollow&quot; noopener noreferrer\">Laurel Wamsley<\/a><\/span>  <\/p>\n<div class=\"ftpimagefix\" style=\"float:left\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/13\/722710640\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=business\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1100-c15.jpg\" data-original=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1100.jpg\" alt><\/p>\n<div>\n            <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1200.jpg\"><\/a><\/div>\n<div>\n<div data-crop-type>\n<div>\n            <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1200.jpg\">Enlarge this image<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div aria-label=\"Image caption\">\n<p>\n                Chinese Vice Premier Liu He talks with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin as he departs a round of trade talks in Washington on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>                <b aria-label=\"Image credit\"><\/p>\n<p>                    Leah Millis\/Reuters<\/p>\n<p>                <\/b><br \/>\n                <b><b>hide caption<\/b><\/b>\n            <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>            <b><b>toggle caption<\/b><\/b>\n    <\/div>\n<p>    <span aria-label=\"Image credit\"><\/p>\n<p>        Leah Millis\/Reuters<\/p>\n<p>    <\/span>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The Trump administration imposed new higher tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods on Friday morning after trade talks failed to yield a deal. But to the surprise of many, China has yet to retaliate with new tariffs of its own.<\/p>\n<p>Larry Kudlow, Trump&#8217;s top economic adviser said on Sunday that he is among those expecting a reaction from China. But so far &#8220;the expected countermeasures haven&#8217;t yet materialized,&#8221; Kudlow <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5C9PG8KwXwE\">said<\/a> on Fox News Sunday. &#8220;I reckon they will. We&#8217;ll see what they come up with.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>President Trump had struck a genial tone <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1126928408934535168\">in tweets<\/a> on Friday, calling the talks &#8220;candid and constructive.&#8221; But he struck a very different note Saturday, when he came out swinging at a number of targets.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think that China felt they were being beaten so badly in the recent negotiation that they may as well wait around for the next election, 2020, to see if they could get lucky &amp; have a Democrat win &#8211; in which case they would continue to rip-off the USA for $500 Billion a year,&#8221; he <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1127337211777757191\">tweeted<\/a>. &#8220;The only problem is that they know I am going to win (best economy &amp; employment numbers in U.S. history, &amp; much more), and the deal will become far worse for them if it has to be negotiated in my second term. Would be wise for them to act now, but love collecting BIG TARIFFS!&#8221;<\/p>\n<aside aria-label=\"advertisement\">\n<div data-ad-config='{\"network\":\"\/6735\/n6735\",\"site\":{\"default\":\"NPR\",\"mobile\":\"NPRMOBILE\"},\"zone\":\"News_Politics\",\"targets\":{\"testserver\":\"false\",\"storyId\":\"722710640\",\"agg\":[\"593868387\"]},\"location\":\"backstage\",\"deferred\":false,\"isBetweenContent\":true,\"isAggSponsorship\":false,\"borderClass\":\"\"}'><\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Kudlow was considerably more measured on Sunday. He emphasized the talks&#8217; ongoing nature, and discouraged the term &#8220;trade war,&#8221; saying that the tariffs were simply part of the negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>Trump and Xi will likely talk at the G20 summit late next month in Japan, Kudlow said, and China&#8217;s ambassador has invited U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to Beijing.<\/p>\n<p><!-- END ID=\"RES722714751\" CLASS=\"BUCKETWRAP INTERNALLINK INSETTWOCOLUMN INSET2COL \" --><\/p>\n<p>Tariffs on Chinese goods increased from 10% to 25% on Friday, making the underlying cost of those items higher for U.S. customers. The Trump administration has imposed tariffs on Chinese goods before, and in each case, China was quick to impose tariffs on U.S. products. It was expected that Beijing would raise tariffs on U.S. goods to 25%.<\/p>\n<p>But that hasn&#8217;t happened yet. And it&#8217;s not clear why not.<\/p>\n<p>Wei Jianguo, a former vice-minister at the Ministry of Commerce who handled foreign trade, <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scmp.com\/economy\/china-economy\/article\/3009960\/china-kung-fu-master-and-can-deliver-deadly-punch-us-economy\">told<\/a> the <em>South China Morning Post<\/em> that China was prepared for a long trade war.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;China will not only act as a kung fu master in response to US tricks, but also as an experienced boxer and can deliver a deadly punch at the end,&#8221; Wei said.<\/p>\n<p>With the talks in limbo, Chinese stock markets <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/china-markets\/china-stocks-resume-slump-yuan-weakens-on-trade-impasse-with-u-s-idUSL4N22P144\">dipped on Monday<\/a>, and the yuan hit a four-month low. But markets there are still higher than analysts had predicted.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who pays?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Trump has repeatedly framed the tariffs as primarily hurting China. For instance, last week at the White House, he said, &#8220;Our country can take in $120 billion a year in tariffs. Paid for mostly by China, by the way. Not by us. A lot of people try and steer it in a different direction. Ultimately it&#8217;s paid for largely by China.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But actually it&#8217;s American businesses that will pay the tariffs, and in many cases, pass the expense on to their American customers. In some cases, China might absorb some of the cost to stay competitive, but for the most part, it&#8217;s folks in the U.S. that will pay the price.<\/p>\n<p>Kudlow, Trump&#8217;s economic adviser, said as much on Sunday. &#8220;I don&#8217;t disagree with that,&#8221; he said to Fox News&#8217;s Chris Wallace. But he added that &#8220;both sides will suffer on this.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He downplayed concerns that the tariffs would lead to U.S. job losses and hurt the GDP. &#8220;The United States&#8217; economy is in a boom,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to do what you&#8217;ve got to do. We have had unfair trading practices all these years and so in my judgment, the economic consequences are so small, but the possible improvement in trade and exports and open markets for the United States \u2014 this is worthwhile doing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!-- END ID=\"RES722714803\" CLASS=\"BUCKETWRAP INTERNALLINK INSETTWOCOLUMN INSET2COL \" --><\/p>\n<p>Previous rounds of tariffs is already making life more expensive in the U.S., as NPR&#8217;s Yuki Noguchi <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/10\/721921317\/new-round-of-tariffs-take-a-bigger-bite-of-consumers-budget\">reports<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>&#8220;They&#8217;ve increased consumer costs by $1.4 billion a month, <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.princeton.edu\/~reddings\/papers\/CEPR-DP13564.pdf\">according to experts from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Princeton and Columbia University<\/a>. To date, tariffs have largely affected raw materials like chemicals and wooden beams used to make other products, so the cost increases appear incremental to the consumer. But additional new tariffs would boost prices on a broader number of finished goods \u2014 things consumers actually buy, like bicycles.<\/p>\n<p>This latest round of tariffs will add another $500 a year in costs for the average American household, says Katheryn Russ, an economics professor at the University of California at Davis. And that could grow. President Trump has pledged to broaden tariffs even further to all Chinese imports \u2014 including big-ticket items. &#8216;Once the tariffs go onto cellphones, I mean then you&#8217;re going to see people scream,'&#8221; she says.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> <em>NPR Shanghai correspondent Rob Schmitz contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/\">Let&#8217;s block ads!<\/a><\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/acceptable.html\">(Why?)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source:: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/13\/722710640\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=business\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Trump Administration Ratchets Up Tariffs, So Far Without Retaliation From China\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/13\/722710640\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=business<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ftpimagefix\" style=\"float:left\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/13\/722710640\/trump-administration-ratchets-up-tariffs-so-far-without-retaliation-from-china?utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=business\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" src=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1100-c15.jpg\" data-original=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1100.jpg\" alt><\/p>\n<div>\n            <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1200.jpg\"><\/a><\/div>\n<div>\n<div data-crop-type>\n<div>\n            <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/media.npr.org\/assets\/img\/2019\/05\/13\/rtx6v721-203800b6898d5a71c434bf8e40d16362d71fbc58-s1200.jpg\">Enlarge this image<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div aria-label=\"Image caption\">\n<p>\n                Chinese Vice Premier Liu He talks with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin as he departs a round of trade talks in Washington on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>                <b aria-label=\"Image credit\"><\/p>\n<p>                    Leah Millis\/Reuters<\/p>\n<p>                <\/b><br \/>\n                <b><b>hide caption<\/b><\/b>\n            <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>            <b><b>toggle caption<\/b><\/b>\n    <\/div>\n<p>    <span aria-label=\"Image credit\"><\/p>\n<p>        Leah Millis\/Reuters<\/p>\n<p>    <\/span>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The Trump administration imposed new higher tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods on Friday morning after trade talks failed to yield a deal. But to the surprise of many, China has yet to retaliate with new tariffs of its own.<\/p>\n<p>Larry Kudlow, Trump&#8217;s top economic adviser said on Sunday that he is among those expecting a reaction from China. But so far &#8220;the expected countermeasures haven&#8217;t yet materialized,&#8221; Kudlow <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5C9PG8KwXwE\">said<\/a> on Fox News Sunday. &#8220;I reckon they will. We&#8217;ll see what they come up with.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>President Trump had struck a genial tone <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1126928408934535168\">in tweets<\/a> on Friday, calling the talks &#8220;candid and constructive.&#8221; But he struck a very different note Saturday, when he came out swinging at a number of targets.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think that China felt they were being beaten so badly in the recent negotiation that they may as well wait around for the next election, 2020, to see if they could get lucky &amp; have a Democrat win &#8211; in which case they would continue to rip-off the USA for $500 Billion a year,&#8221; he <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1127337211777757191\">tweeted<\/a>. &#8220;The only problem is that they know I am going to win (best economy &amp; employment numbers in U.S. history, &amp; much more), and the deal will become far worse for them if it has to be negotiated in my second term. Would be wise for them to act now, but love collecting BIG TARIFFS!&#8221;<\/p>\n<aside aria-label=\"advertisement\">\n<div data-ad-config='{\"network\":\"\/6735\/n6735\",\"site\":{\"default\":\"NPR\",\"mobile\":\"NPRMOBILE\"},\"zone\":\"News_Politics\",\"targets\":{\"testserver\":\"false\",\"storyId\":\"722710640\",\"agg\":[\"593868387\"]},\"location\":\"backstage\",\"deferred\":false,\"isBetweenContent\":true,\"isAggSponsorship\":false,\"borderClass\":\"\"}'><\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Kudlow was considerably more measured on Sunday. He emphasized the talks&#8217; ongoing nature, and discouraged the term &#8220;trade war,&#8221; saying that the tariffs were simply part of the negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>Trump and Xi will likely talk at the G20 summit late next month in Japan, Kudlow said, and China&#8217;s ambassador has invited U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to Beijing.<\/p>\n<p><!-- END ID=\"RES722714751\" CLASS=\"BUCKETWRAP INTERNALLINK INSETTWOCOLUMN INSET2COL \" --><\/p>\n<p>Tariffs on Chinese goods increased from 10% to 25% on Friday, making the underlying cost of those items higher for U.S. customers. The Trump administration has imposed tariffs on Chinese goods before, and in each case, China was quick to impose tariffs on U.S. products. It was expected that Beijing would raise tariffs on U.S. goods to 25%.<\/p>\n<p>But that hasn&#8217;t happened yet. And it&#8217;s not clear why not.<\/p>\n<p>Wei Jianguo, a former vice-minister at the Ministry of Commerce who handled foreign trade, <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scmp.com\/economy\/china-economy\/article\/3009960\/china-kung-fu-master-and-can-deliver-deadly-punch-us-economy\">told<\/a> the <em>South China Morning Post<\/em> that China was prepared for a long trade war.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;China will not only act as a kung fu master in response to US tricks, but also as an experienced boxer and can deliver a deadly punch at the end,&#8221; Wei said.<\/p>\n<p>With the talks in limbo, Chinese stock markets <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/china-markets\/china-stocks-resume-slump-yuan-weakens-on-trade-impasse-with-u-s-idUSL4N22P144\">dipped on Monday<\/a>, and the yuan hit a four-month low. But markets there are still higher than analysts had predicted.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who pays?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Trump has repeatedly framed the tariffs as primarily hurting China. For instance, last week at the White House, he said, &#8220;Our country can take in $120 billion a year in tariffs. Paid for mostly by China, by the way. Not by us. A lot of people try and steer it in a different direction. Ultimately it&#8217;s paid for largely by China.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But actually it&#8217;s American businesses that will pay the tariffs, and in many cases, pass the expense on to their American customers. In some cases, China might absorb some of the cost to stay competitive, but for the most part, it&#8217;s folks in the U.S. that will pay the price.<\/p>\n<p>Kudlow, Trump&#8217;s economic adviser, said as much on Sunday. &#8220;I don&#8217;t disagree with that,&#8221; he said to Fox News&#8217;s Chris Wallace. But he added that &#8220;both sides will suffer on this.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He downplayed concerns that the tariffs would lead to U.S. job losses and hurt the GDP. &#8220;The United States&#8217; economy is in a boom,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to do what you&#8217;ve got to do. We have had unfair trading practices all these years and so in my judgment, the economic consequences are so small, but the possible improvement in trade and exports and open markets for the United States \u2014 this is worthwhile doing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!-- END ID=\"RES722714803\" CLASS=\"BUCKETWRAP INTERNALLINK INSETTWOCOLUMN INSET2COL \" --><\/p>\n<p>Previous rounds of tariffs is already making life more expensive in the U.S., as NPR&#8217;s Yuki Noguchi <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/05\/10\/721921317\/new-round-of-tariffs-take-a-bigger-bite-of-consumers-budget\">reports<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>&#8220;They&#8217;ve increased consumer costs by $1.4 billion a month, <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.princeton.edu\/~reddings\/papers\/CEPR-DP13564.pdf\">according to experts from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Princeton and Columbia University<\/a>. To date, tariffs have largely affected raw materials like chemicals and wooden beams used to make other products, so the cost increases appear incremental to the consumer. But additional new tariffs would boost prices on a broader number of finished goods \u2014 things consumers actually buy, like bicycles.<\/p>\n<p>This latest round of tariffs will add another $500 a year in costs for the average American household, says Katheryn Russ, an economics professor at the University of California at Davis. And that could grow. President Trump has pledged to broaden tariffs even further to all Chinese imports \u2014 including big-ticket items. &#8216;Once the tariffs go onto cellphones, I mean then you&#8217;re going to see people scream,'&#8221; she says.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> <em>NPR Shanghai correspondent Rob Schmitz contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/\">Let&#8217;s block ads!<\/a><\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/acceptable.html\">(Why?)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/associatednews.info\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}