Sports

No Image

Snowmobiler Kills Dog Competing In Iditarod; Attack Apparently Intentional

Aliy Zirkle handles her dogs during a rest in Galena along the Yukon River, her last stop before heading towards Nulato. Late in the night, as she approached Nulato, Zirkle was attacked by a snowmobiler a few miles outside the small community.

Aliy Zirkle handles her dogs during a rest in Galena along the Yukon River, her last stop before heading towards Nulato. Late in the night, as she approached Nulato, Zirkle was attacked by a snowmobiler a few miles outside the small community. Zachariah Hughes/Alaska Public Media hide caption

toggle caption Zachariah Hughes/Alaska Public Media

One dog has been killed and multiple dogs have been injured by a snowmobiler in what appears to be an intentional attack on competitors in the Iditarod Race in Alaska.

Iditarod veteran Aliy Zirkle was the first to report an attack.

A snowmachiner had “repeatedly attempted to harm her and her team,” the Iditarod Trail Committee says, and one of Zirkle’s dogs had received a non-life-threatening injury.

Zirkle reported the attack when she arrived in Nulato, Alaska, in the wee hours of the morning, and race officials and law enforcement were notified.

In what sounds like an intentional incident, a snowmachiner ran into Jeff King’s dogs outside Nulato, kill 3-yo Nash pic.twitter.com/xG4eJpiMeR

— Zachariah Hughes (@ZachHughesAK) March 12, 2016

Then Jeff King, a four-time Iditarod champion who was behind Zirkle, reported a similar encounter.

King’s team was hit by a snowmobiler, injuring several dogs and killing one — Nash, a 3-year-old male.

Reporter Emily Schwing tells our Newscast unit that King’s sled has lights and reflectors.

“It really felt like reckless bravado and playing chicken,” King told Emily.

Zachariah Hughes, a reporter for Alaska Public Media, says that neither King nor Zirkle were injured, according to state troopers.

A suspect has been identified, race officials say, and an investigation has begun.

“Regrettably, this incident very much alters the race of the two mushers competing for a win,” the Trail Committee writes. “However, both are going to continue on their way toward Nome.”

After a four-hour rest, Zirkle left Nulato — leaving one dog behind — in third place. King is still at the checkpoint as of 1 p.m. Eastern.

Emily says on Twitter that King explained, “I’m not gonna let this schmuck take any more of the fun away.”

Alaska State Troopers released a statement saying they’ve arrested Arnold Demoski, 26 of Nulato. He faces two counts of assault in the third degree, one count of reckless endangerment, one count reckless driving and six counts of criminal Mischief in the fifth degree.

You can find updates on this story, as well as full coverage of the Iditarod race, at Alaska Public Media.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Why Fastest U.S. College Mile Runner Won't Be Vying To Be NCAA Champ

Izaic Yorks, a senior at the University of Washington, recently ran a mile in 3:53 — the fastest mile of any American collegiate athlete. Here, he competes on Feb. 27 in Seattle.
2:32

Download

Izaic Yorks, a senior at the University of Washington, recently ran a mile in 3:53 — the fastest mile of any American collegiate athlete. Here, he competes on Feb. 27 in Seattle. Stephen Brashear/Red Box Pictures hide caption

toggle caption Stephen Brashear/Red Box Pictures

Last week, Izaic Yorks, a senior at the University of Washington, ran a mile in 3:53 — the fastest college mile ever by an American. The effort qualifies him for the Olympic trials this summer.

So why isn’t Yorks running in the mile at this weekend’s NCAA championships in Birmingham, Ala.?

Turns out, he had to make a decision: run that mile alone, or run with his team in the distance medley relay or DMR.

If he decided to run the mile race, he would have been required to run a preliminary round right before the DMR — compromising his team’s shot at a national title.

Yorks recalls when his coach, Greg Metcalf, pulls him aside to ask what he thinks about running the mile race.

“I was just, no way. I want to do the DMR,” Yorks replied. “That’s what I told these guys I would do. And I’m gonna stick to that word.”

Metcalf continues.

“I’m sitting in my office on Sunday, making our declarations,” Metcalf says. “And I hit the ‘scratch’ button next to Izaic’s name, next to 3:53, I think, ‘Am I the biggest idiot of all time?'”

Maybe. But in a sport that so often celebrates individual glory, Yorks is not only very fast, he’s also very loyal.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'Fantastic Lies' Lays Out 2006 Duke Lacrosse Rape Case

6:56

Download

David Greene talks to director Marina Zenovich about her documentary, Fantastic Lies, about the Duke lacrosse rape trial. The story begins 10 years ago when team members held an off-campus party.

Transcript

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

Ten years ago this Sunday, members of the Duke University lacrosse team held an off-campus party. Two strippers were hired – one of them, a young black woman who went to the police.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FANTASTIC LIES”)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: She’s asked, you know – have you been the victim of a sexual assault? She said yes.

GREENE: What unfolded was a story that captivated the nation. The narrative – wealthy, white university athletes had taken advantage of an underprivileged African-American woman. It made many people sick.

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “FANTASTIC LIES”)

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I’m shocked and appalled that there are still varsity letters on these athletes.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Three weeks after a woman accused several Duke lacrosse players of rape and sexual assault, head coach Mike Pressler has resigned. Also, the rest of the lacrosse season was canceled.

GREENE: Ultimately, three players were charged with rape by District Attorney Mike Nifong who quickly became a big part of the story himself. He did dozens of interviews talking about the case and the athletes’ behavior at a time when he was running for office. He won the election, and he kept his job. This whole story is laid out in the documentary “Fantastic Lies” that’s airing this Sunday on ESPN. The director is Marina Zenovich.

MARINA ZENOVICH: It was just a – you know, a perfect storm of everyone overreacting and kind of journalists taking the lead of the DA who was going on television and basically acting as if he had some smoking gun.

GREENE: But there was no smoking gun. In fact, there was no evidence, DNA or otherwise, that a crime had happened at all. It took more than a year for the three players to clear their names, including Duke’s captain David Evans.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FANTASTIC LIES”)

DAVID EVANS: I am innocent. Reade Seligmann is innocent. Collin Finnerty is innocent. Every member of the Duke University lacrosse team is innocent. You have all been told some fantastic lies.

ROY COOPER: Today, we are filing notices of dismissal for all charges against Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans.

GREENE: Marina Zenovich came into our studios to talk about this ESPN “30 for 30” documentary. And I began by asking her whether people just had this perception that lacrosse players at a big-time university represent a kind of white privilege.

ZENOVICH: I think it’s unfair, but people are going to react the way they want to react. I found it fascinating, as a filmmaker, how people had so much judgment, whether they were right or wrong.

GREENE: Was it hard to get people to talk?

ZENOVICH: Oh, my God. Are you kidding? I literally would just start writing letters almost as a joke to see how many noes I could get. I have a whole file of noes, and it was just one after another.

GREENE: You got some of the players on the team to talk, but none of the three who were actually charged.

ZENOVICH: Right.

GREENE: What did they tell you? Or what was their response to you?

ZENOVICH: Do you know that I’ve never spoken to any of them? I fight and fight to get people to talk, but I never reached out to them myself. They knew the film was happening. They knew that I was trying to get them through their lawyers, through their parents. But on some level, I really respected the fact that they just want to move on. It’s unfortunate that they will be labeled as the Duke lacrosse boys, but unfortunately, that’s what happens.

GREENE: I want to play one clip from one of the professors who spoke to you, James Coleman, a criminal law professor at Duke. Let’s just listen to a little bit of this.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FANTASTIC LIES”)

JAMES COLEMAN: People, you know, treated it like a Christmas tree and they put their lights on it and their ornaments to, you now, push other issues that they could connect to it. But this was the wrong case for that. It doesn’t support all of these other issues I – that people want to sort of, you know, heap up on it and use it as a platform.

GREENE: Say more about the Christmas tree metaphor and what you make of that.

ZENOVICH: Well, everybody brought to this case what they wanted to bring to it, and that’s, I think, a big problem with cases like these. Everyone is coming from their own experience. And I was glad that professor Coleman kind of could explain that because he was in the thick of it.

GREENE: Whose job was it to stop that from happening – to tell people to pause and wait for the truth?

ZENOVICH: Well, I think it’s our elected officials’ – the DA in the case. I mean, you know, everyone looks to the DNA for the truth, you know. But this is a case where he was engaging in serious professional misconduct and was disbarred.

GREENE: I want to play one more clip of tape from the film. It’s – you spoke to Dan Okrent who is the former public editor from The New York Times. And here’s what he had to say.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FANTASTIC LIES”)

DAN OKRENT: It was male over female. It was rich over poor. It was educated over uneducated. My God, all the things that we know happen in the world coming together in one place And you know, journalists – they start to quiver with a thrill when something like this happens.

GREENE: You do sort of paint a picture of journalists as real – as really failing here.

ZENOVICH: You know, it started as a sports story, and it became bigger and bigger. And, as I said, it had a DA who was – you know, didn’t go on one local radio show. He went on national talk shows acting as if the boys were already guilty. I mean, this all played into this mishandling of this case.

GREENE: There was something about, you know, three white men – you know, that the truth being discovered and not being – not having to serve time for a crime they didn’t commit. And I just think about, you know, the Innocence Project, which these young men have joined, which is to get wrongly accused people, you know, out of prison. And, you know, I just think about the number of young black men around this country who are serving time in prison for crimes they didn’t commit. Did that sort of thing come to mind as you were putting this documentary together?

ZENOVICH: You know, it did. But what also came to mind is that this film focuses on a case where men were falsely accused and where a DA engaged in serious professional misconduct. But this should not, in any way, detract from the fact that the vast majority of reports of sexual assault are true. And to use this case, the Duke Lacrosse case, as representative of a wider issue would be a profound injustice to the real victims who have the courage to come forward.

GREENE: That was the director Marina Zenovich. Her documentary “Fantastic Lies” airs on ESPN this Sunday night.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

NFL Takes Bidders To Live Stream Regular Season Games

3:43

Download

The NFL plans to sell the rights to live stream more than a dozen regular season football games next season. NPR’s Kelly McEvers talks to Peter Kafka of ReCode about the NFL’s plan.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

The NFL sees a future in the Internet. They must because they’re taking bidders for the rights to 18 regular-season football games. And when we talk about rights, we’re talking about digital rights. That is the right to live stream a football game. That means you could eventually end up watching football on sites like Facebook. Peter Kafka wrote about this for the tech news site ReCode. Hi there, Peter.

PETER KAFKA: Hi. How are you?

MCEVERS: Tell us a little more about where things stand with this. Facebook and Amazon are among the big tech companies that want to live stream NFL games. Is that right?

KAFKA: That’s right. The NFL has allowed various people to stream its games on the Internet for several years now. There hasn’t been a lot of interest in doing it, but you could watch the Super Bowl via a CBS app this year. You could watch – NBC streams games on Sunday nights. You can watch those for free. The big deal this year is the NFL has said we’re going to auction off specific digital rights; we really want digital players to come in here. And so you might see people who don’t traditionally show live video and who’ve never shown live NFL game, like Facebook, like Amazon, getting into this market for the first time.

MCEVERS: Well, what is in it for the NFL to break this out like this as a separate package?

KAFKA: Oh, this – that equation’s really easy. The NFL gets more money or games they’ve already sold at least once and multiple times. The NFL’s been very, very smart about taking very, very valuable asset – its games – and maximizing its value by sort of slicing and dicing and offering different people different access to these games. And now, for the first time, they’ve said there’s a specific digital package. What do you want to pay us?

MCEVERS: And so, then, what is in it for the companies who might be bidding for this – Facebook, Amazon, Verizon?

KAFKA: That is a really good question. In theory, there’s some advertising revenues these guys can generate. There isn’t going to be a giant audience for this stuff because if you can watch a football game on TV, traditionally that’s probably where you’re going to want to watch it. I’m not sure there’s going to be a huge demand to stream an NFL game on your phone via a Facebook app. But that said, there’s some interest in this stuff. Yahoo did this last fall as sort of an experiment with the NFL and got a couple million people watching at least a portion of a really boring regular season game. There’s an asterisk there because Yahoo made it nearly impossible to use any part of Yahoo – Yahoo Mail, Tumblr, anything – without seeing it. They were auto-playing it. So there’s still big question about much demand there is to watch this stuff over the Internet, but there’s some. And the NFL is really looking forward to a few years from now, when some of its existing TV contracts come up. And they’re imagining a scenario where not only do they have CBS and NBC, ABC bidding for the rights to show these games, but they might actually have Facebook or Apple or Verizon coming in and saying, no, no, we want the exclusive rights to these games. And that’s very exciting for the NFL, at least as a business.

MCEVERS: You’re right about that Yahoo deal. I mean, they paid something like $20 million to stream just one game, and that’s for a million or two viewers. How does that math work out?

KAFKA: That math is sort of a shrug, right? The NFL said this is an experiment. Yahoo said this is an experiment. Yahoo would say, privately, we’re not going to cover our costs on this, so it’s not a moneymaking exercise. I think they want the bragging rights. I think there’s some of this year – for Amazon, Facebook, other folks that might be entering this, they’re probably not going to make a ton of money the first year or so streaming these games, but they want to distinguish themselves. And again, you’ve got a bunch of people who are all very interested in sort of jumping on the web video boom. They don’t really know what it looks like, but they know there’s a boom there. And if you can have NFL games and no one else has them, or at least you can say that, that’s a way to distinguish yourself. It’s a really could branding exercise, I think, is a lot of ways some of these folks are going to think about it.

MCEVERS: Right. So its sounds like the NFL is kind of saying, you know, get in on the ground floor.

KAFKA: Get in on the ground floor, and you will have a shiny bauble that none of your competitors will be able to say they have.

MCEVERS: That’s peter Kafka. He’s senior editor for media at ReCode. Thank you very much.

KAFKA: Thanks for having me.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

How Google's Neural Network Hopes To Beat A 'Go' World Champion

South Korean Go champion Lee Sedol (right) poses with Google DeepMind head Demis Hassabis. On Wednesday, Sedol will begin a five-match series against a computer.
3:36

Download

South Korean Go champion Lee Sedol (right) poses with Google DeepMind head Demis Hassabis. On Wednesday, Sedol will begin a five-match series against a computer. Jung Yeon-Je/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Jung Yeon-Je/AFP/Getty Images

In South Korea on Wednesday, a human champion of the ancient game of “Go” will square off against a computer programmed by Google DeepMind, an AI company owned by the search giant. If the machine can beat the man over a five-day match, then researchers say it will be a milestone for artificial intelligence.

Here are the key things to know about the match and what it will mean for the future, both of humanity and our robot overlords.

1. A computer won at chess 20 years ago. Go is tougher.

In the game of Go, players try to seize territory and encircle each other's pieces.

In the game of Go, players try to seize territory and encircle each other’s pieces. Marcin Bajer/Flickr hide caption

toggle caption Marcin Bajer/Flickr

IBM grabbed the headlines when its Deep Blue supercomputer bested world champion Gary Kasparov in 1997.

But chess is a computer’s game. It has strict rules and a limited number of moves each turn. Deep Blue gained the upper hand by crunching a huge volume of possible moves to see which ones would lead to a win.

Go is a very different kind of game. Players use stones to fence off territory and capture each other’s pieces. It has fewer rules and more choices each turn. In fact, “there are more possible ‘Go’ positions than there are atoms in the Universe,” says Demis Hassabis, a researcher with Google DeepMind.

Computers hate choices. Go is a nightmare for rule-bound computers.

2. This program taught itself how to play.

The Google program, known as “Alpha Go,” actually learned the game without much human help. It started by studying a database of about 100,000 human matches, and then continued by playing against itself millions of times.

As it went, it reprogrammed itself and improved. This type of self-learning program is known as a neural network, and it’s based on theories of how the human brain works.

AlphaGo consists of two neural networks: The first tries to figure out the best move to play each turn, and the second evaluates who is winning the match overall.

It’s far more powerful than any Go-playing computer program to date

[embedded content]

Google DeepMind’s press conference on 8 March in Seoul, South Korea.

Google DeepMind YouTube

3. The machine is not guaranteed to win.

In October, AlphaGo beat a European champion of the game, Fan Hui. But Hui is ranked far below the program’s current opponent, Lee Sedol, who is considered among the best Go players in the world. Sedol may still be able to beat AlphaGo.

Nevertheless, the overall approach is clearly working, and soon AlphaGo, or another similar program, likely will overtake the world’s best

4. This program will not lead to a dystopian future in which humanity is enslaved by killer robots. At least not for a few more years.

The deep-learning approach is making great strides. It’s getting particularly good at recognizing images (and more creepily, human faces).

But skull-crushing mechanical suzerain? Probably not. For one thing, physical robots still suck. Seriously. They’re just terrible.

[embedded content]
Nature YouTube

And Google has a rosier purpose in mind anyway. It hopes programs such as AlphaGo can improve language translation and health care tools. It might even someday be used to build a sophisticated virtual assistant. “I’ve concluded that the winner here, no matter what happens, is humanity,” Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, said in a pre-match news conference.

Regardless of what you think about AI, it seems likely this sort of program will change the way we live and work in the years ahead.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

See The 'Best Minnesota High School Hockey Hair' Featuring Lots Of Mullets

[embedded content]
YouTube

“Texas has their Friday night lights, Indiana has their barnyard hoops — here in Minnesota, it’s the land of 10,000 locks,” says the narrator in the intro of the “Best Minnesota High School Hockey Hair” awards video. “Hockey is king.”

The competition to crown the best hair was stiff this year, but in the end, a quartet from Burnsville, Minn., took the top spot.

“At No. 1, I’m sure this will be controversial, but hockey’s a team game and what Burnsville did is special,” the narrator says. “If you watch this — they’re going to show how deep their lineup is. They’re about to go back to back: beard, mullet, ginger, Afro. That’s like a hockey team going four lines deep. It’s unbelievable. These guys are like the super group of salad; they are like the Village People of hockey hair — look at this. All in a row. Burnsville, love ya.”

Salad — for the uninitiated — is another way of saying lettuce, which of course, is slang for a bro’s long hair. Other synonyms: arugula, flow.

The video, created by “Game On! Minnesota,” is the fifth annual video. It features appearances from ESPN’s hockey analyst Barry Melrose, “a guy that used to tuck his mullet into his dress shirt,” and New York Islanders’ winger Matt Martin, “who knows a thing or two about great hair.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

What's Better Than A Buzzer-Beater? How About 3 … In A Single Game?

3:30

Download

On Thursday, an epic high school basketball game — featuring three buzzer-beating buckets — ended with a last-second shot in quadruple overtime, sending one team to the Minnesota state tournament.

Transcript

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

So it is March, the height of basketball season. But college and pro ballers are not the only ones serving up thrills. This past Thursday, there was an epic basketball game in Minnesota. A couple of high school rivals collided in a regional championship game that went to not one, not two overtime periods but four. And you know how exciting a last-second buzzer-beater is – this one had three of them. It was Waseca v. Marshall. Waseca was leading as they neared the end of regulation time. Matt Collins was in the crowd.

MATTHEW COLLINS: They actually missed some free throws that allowed Marshall to crawl back into the game. And Marshall came down and hit the three that rolled around the rim and sat on top of the rim and eventually went in to send it into overtime.

(SOUNDBITE OF BASKETBALL GAME)

MARTIN: So that’s one last-second shot to tie it up. The overtime period that followed ended in yet another tie. The next overtime – same thing, another tie. It came down to a third heart-pounding overtime. Let’s skip to the end. Marshall is up three points with only one second left on the clock. Waseca was all the way at the other end of the court.

COLLINS: The whole place thought the game was over. Some people around us were starting to leave. And Waseca then inbounded it then to Nick Dufault, who is their kind of star player. And from around the opposite free-throw line, he just turned and threw it up.

MARTIN: Now, consider that a regular three-point shot is about 20-feet away. Dufault was almost 80 feet from his own basket when he let it go.

COLLINS: It didn’t even touch the rim. It went straight through the basket. I mean, it was unbelievable.

(SOUNDBITE OF BASKETBALL GAME)

UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Cheering).

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: Oh, my God.

MARTIN: Needless to say, nobody else was leaving early as the game headed into the fourth overtime. Marshall tied up the game again with time running out. And as if Hollywood were writing the script, enter the unlikely hero – 17-year-old junior Cole Streich, a guy who could have put the game away for Waseca earlier.

COLE STREICH: Yeah, at the end of regulation, I had a free throw where I could have put us up by four. And then I ended up missing that, and I knew I had to make up for it somehow.

MARTIN: And redemption awaits those who seek it. With five seconds on the clock, Streich got the ball near half-court. As he dribbled toward the basket, defenders seemed to be backing away from him. The sea parted. They were focusing on the guy who sank that 80-footer earlier in the game.

STREICH: So they left me wide open. No one came out to guard me.

(SOUNDBITE OF BASKETBALL GAME)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: Go, go, go, go, go…

MARTIN: Three, two, one…

STREICH: So I just shot it.

(SOUNDBITE OF BASKETBALL GAME)

UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Cheering).

MARTIN: Swish.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

MARTIN: A third-buzzer beater, this one for the win.

STREICH: It was just chaos. Everyone went wild in the crowd, and we were just all ecstatic that we won.

MARTIN: Final score – Waseca 103, Marshall 100. Amid the frenzy though, Matt Collins noticed the Marshall players on the court trying to process something beyond just the pain of a loss.

COLLINS: They acknowledged and realized how incredible of a game that was. And I think that’s a game that no team should have to lose. But there was definitely a mutual respect that – wow – that we just played a classic game that’s going to go down in history.

MARTIN: Smelling salts not included with the ticket price – should’ve been.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Tennis Writer And Commentator Bud Collins Dies

Venus Williams (left) and Serena Williams are interviewed by Bud Collins before the 2009 U.S. Open.

Venus Williams (left) and Serena Williams are interviewed by Bud Collins before the 2009 U.S. Open. Rob Tringali/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Rob Tringali/Getty Images

With his colorful style in both commentary and fashion, tennis writer and broadcaster Bud Collins livened up the tennis world for nearly 50 years. He died at his home in Brookline, Mass., at age 86.

His death was announced by his wife, Anita Ruthling Klaussen, on her Facebook page.

ARTHUR WORTH “BUD” COLLINS17 JUNE 1929 – 4 March 2016 Good night, sweet prince,And flights of angels sing thee to…

Posted by Anita Ruthling Klaussen on Friday, March 4, 2016

Collins, a longtime columnist for The Boston Globe and an analyst for CBS, NBC, ESPN and the Tennis Channel, was best known not only for his commentary during NBC’s Breakfast at Wimbledon broadcast live on weekend mornings but also for his lively pants and bow ties, sometimes yellow, sometimes purple, always vibrant.

In his remembrance of Collins, NPR’s Only A Game host Bill Littlefield wrote:

“He was almost as well-known for his sartorial splendor — more specifically for the gaudy pants that became a kind of trademark. In our conversation during the 2002 French Open, I mentioned to Bud that one of the players, Jeff Grant, had noted Bud’s trousers.

” ‘I think he had some kind of green and pink pastel with some flowers,’ Grant told me. ‘Vintage Bud.’

“I asked Bud for comment, and he responded, ‘I can categorically state that I have been paid by no one to wear anything. And no one would pay me to wear anything, and most people are surprised when I even pay for those creations.’ “

The pants were his “trademark and a symbol of the gusto he brought to his reporting,” NPR’s Tom Goldman reports.

“Collins wrote several tennis encyclopedia, and coached tennis at Brandeis University where one of his players was future activist Abbie Hoffman,” Tom says. “But it was his years of tennis columns and commentary that defined his career.”

The Globe wrote:

“In newspaper columns and as a TV commentator, Mr. Collins provided the sport with its most authoritative voice, and he also wrote a tennis encyclopedia and a history of the game, all while remaining one of the most congenial people anyone met courtside or in the press box.”

“Few people have had the historical significance, the lasting impact and the unqualified love for tennis as Bud Collins,” tennis legend Billie Jean King tweeted. “He was an outstanding journalist, an entertaining broadcaster and as our historian he never let us forget or take for granted the rich history of our sport. I will miss him and I will always cherish our memories of our journeys together.”

Few people have had the historical significance, lasting impact and the unqualified love for tennis as Bud Collins. pic.twitter.com/CLuJF2ThVm

— Billie Jean King (@BillieJeanKing) March 4, 2016

The New York Times wrote that “while he focused on tennis, he mused about anything that caught his eye” and covered combat in the Vietnam War. The paper adds:

“Mr. Collins was much the showman. He often quoted his imaginary Uncle Studley’s reflections on tennis. Steffi Graf was ‘Fraulein Forehand,’ Bjorn Borg was ‘the Angelic Assassin’ and the hard-serving Venus and Serena Williams were ‘Sisters Sledgehammer.’ He considered himself the representative of the everyday player, or the hacker, as he put it.”

Collins’ role as a tennis commentator had been limited in recent years as his health failed, but last year he attended the U.S. Open in New York, where the media center was dedicated and named in his honor.

Listen to NPR’s Only A Game host Bill Littlefield remember Collins on Here & Now.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

A Team Of Refugees Will Compete At The Olympic Games In Rio

A woman takes pictures of the Olympic rings at Madureira Park, the third largest park in Rio de Janeiro.

A woman takes pictures of the Olympic rings at Madureira Park, the third largest park in Rio de Janeiro. Yasuyoshi Chiba /AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Yasuyoshi Chiba /AFP/Getty Images

A team of refugees will compete alongside athletes representing their home countries at the Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, the International Olympic Committee has announced.

Previously, athletes who did not represent a country were not allowed to compete.

The team will likely number between five and 10 athletes, the committee said in a statement, and “will be treated at the Olympic Games like all the other teams.”

“By welcoming the team of Refugee Olympic Athletes to the Olympic Games Rio 2016, we want to send a message of hope for all refugees in our world,” IOC President Thomas Bach said in a statement.

Here’s more from Bach:

“Having no national team to belong to, having no flag to march behind, having no national anthem to be played, these refugee athletes will be welcomed to the Olympic Games with the Olympic flag and with the Olympic Anthem. They will have a home together with all the other 11,000 athletes from 206 National Olympic Committees in the Olympic village.”

The IOC said it has identified 43 contenders for the places on the team and the final group will be announced in June. Along with athletic prowess, potential team members will be assessed by “official refugee status verified by the United Nations, and personal situation and background.”

There are some 20.2 million refugees globally, according to U.N. figures. That includes 5.1 million registered refugees in camps in the Middle East, and an additional 15.1 million “refugees of concern.”

According to The Guardian, the IOC identified three possible refugee-team contenders in December:

“They were a Syrian swimmer based in Germany, a judoka from the Democratic Republic of Congo who was living in Brazil and an Iranian taekwondo fighter training in Belgium.”

The chosen athletes will march in the opening ceremony under the Olympic flag, just in front of home team Brazil. Uniforms and coaches will be provided by the IOC.

Prior to Thursday’s announcement, CNN highlighted a group of elite refugee athletes.

“I ask God to bring peace back to my country,” Congolese karate champion Martial Nantoura told the network. “But I am still on the national team. If someone tells me to go to the mat, I will go.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Basketball's 3-Pointer: From Tacky Gimmick To Strategic Platform

Stephen Curry (right) of the Golden State Warriors dribbles toward Pablo Prigioni of the Los Angeles Clippers during the first half of a game at Staples Center on Feb. 20.
3:22

Download

Stephen Curry (right) of the Golden State Warriors dribbles toward Pablo Prigioni of the Los Angeles Clippers during the first half of a game at Staples Center on Feb. 20. Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

It was not that long ago when the accepted wisdom in football was that the running game had to be established — that was always the obligatory verb: established — before passes could become effective. My, we know how that has changed. Now the pass is established from the get-go, and running is an afterthought.

Well, I think it is certified now that basketball has experienced the same sort of offensive sea change. At all levels — with men and women — the 3-point shot has utterly transformed the way the game is played. More and more, the players are spread out, looking to pop behind the 3-point arc. More and more teams are, in the vernacular, “going small,” with only one big man down deep. Good grief, the position of power forward is in the process of going the way of short shorts.

Click the audio to hear Frank Deford’s full 2 cents on the 3-point shot.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.