Sports

No Image

Opening Day In Major League Baseball Featured 3 Games

Cardinals leadoff man Matt Carpenter walked up to the plate, shook hands with the umpire, greeted the Pittsburgh catcher and got comfortable in the batter’s box.

Just like that, fans everywhere settled in for a fresh new season.

“Opening day, for me, is sort of like Christmas,” Commissioner Rob Manfred said at the Toronto-Tampa Bay game. “It’s one of the most exciting days of the year.”

A World Series rematch in Kansas City and a meeting of NL playoff teams sweetened Sunday’s schedule.

It was 39 degrees at PNC Park when Pirates lefty Francisco Liriano threw the first pitch of the season. Hours earlier, the grounds crew cleared ice off the tarp after snow flurries fell.

Liriano did just fine: six shutout innings, 10 strikeouts and an RBI single for the first run of 2016 in a 4-1 win over St. Louis. Pirates newcomer David Freese did well, too, getting the first hit of the season.

All-Star Chris Archer had no weather worries when he started for the Rays under the dome at Tropicana Field. His bigger concern was the Blue Jays – the highest-scoring in the big leagues last season, Toronto got a two-run single in the first inning from Edwin Encarnacion and went on to win, 5-3. Troy Tulowitzki hit the majors’ first home run of the year.

In Kansas City, it was 74 degrees under a setting sun when the champion Royals hosted the team they beat last October, the New York Mets.

The parking lots at Kauffman Stadium were jammed with tailgaters long before the first pitch, and Royals rooters roared when the World Series flag was raised in right field.

“It’s a fun day to be part of,” Kansas City first baseman Eric Hosmer said, adding, “but once it’s over it is, ‘OK, time to get back into the routine.'”

Matt Harvey started for the Mets vs. Edinson Volquez. They faced each other on the final day of 2015, in Game 5 at Citi Field, where the Royals rallied to win the crown. Volquez took the mound wearing a different hat than his teammates, the spring training version with a gold crown over the KC logo.

But everything else went according to plan for the Royals, who picked up where they left off in November by beating Harvey and the Mets 4-3 in the first opening-day rematch of a World Series.

With runners at the corners in the ninth inning, All-Star closer Wade Davis struck out David Wright and Yoenis Cespedes to preserve the victory.

Fans in Kansas City saw something new, too. There’s extra netting behind the plate to protect crowds from foul balls, a recommendation MLB made to all teams during the offseason.

Most every other club starts up Monday. The Tigers and Marlins are the last to open, on Tuesday at Marlins Park.

David Ortiz begins his farewell tour when the Red Sox play at Cleveland in the Boston debut of high-priced ace David Price. Big Papi and Price took it easy Sunday, going across the street from Progressive Field to watch LeBron James and the Cavaliers take on Charlotte.

Plenty of top pitchers were on tap to start Monday, with Zack Greinke, Dallas Keuchel, Clayton Kershaw and Felix Hernandez among them.

NL Cy Young Award winner Jake Arrieta starts Monday night as the popular and talented Chicago Cubs visit the Los Angeles Angels.

“If you factor in everything – experience, talent level, the motivation of the group – they want to become a part of the first team that wins a World Series for the Cubs in a long, long time,” Chicago manager Joe Maddon said. “So there’s so many good things that can repel pressure and expectations.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

North Carolina Beats Syracuse To Advance To NCAA Final

North Carolina's Isaiah Hicks (4) dunks during the first half of the NCAA Final Four tournament college basketball semifinal game against Syracuse, Saturday, April 2, in Houston.

North Carolina’s Isaiah Hicks (4) dunks during the first half of the NCAA Final Four tournament college basketball semifinal game against Syracuse, Saturday, April 2, in Houston. Eric Gay/AP hide caption

toggle caption Eric Gay/AP

North Carolina will look for its sixth NCAA championship when the Tar Heels meet the Villanova Wildcats, trying for their second, on Monday night.

The Tar Heels (33-6) last won it all in 2009 and Villanova’s only title came in 1985.

Both teams advanced to the championship game with lopsided wins, but Villanova’s was far more of a blowout than North Carolina’s.

The top-seeded Tar Heels beat 10-seed Syracuse 83-66 on Saturday night in a national semifinal for their 10th straight win. That was after the Wildcats made easy work of Buddy Hield and Oklahoma, with a 95-51 trampling that was the biggest margin of victory in a national semifinal game.

Villanova (34-5) did it with 71.4 percent shooting led by Josh Hart, who scored 23 points on 10 of 12 shooting.

That percentage was the second best in the history of the Final Four. The only team to shoot a higher percentage was that eighth-seeded team in 1985 eighth-seeded team coached by Rollie Massimino which shot 78.6 percent to pull an upset over Georgetown in the final.

“They shot the ball very efficient tonight,” Hield said of Villanova. “If a team do this, I feel they can go win it all.”

It won’t be easy against the only No. 1 seed to advance to the Final Four this season. Coach Roy Williams has already led two North Carolina teams to championships and this squad has won each of its five tournament games this year by an average of 16.2 points.

Nevada sports books opened betting on the title game with North Carolina as a 2-point favorite.

Williams wasn’t ready to talk about the next game just minutes after North Carolina had wrapped up its semifinal victory.

“Marty Schottenheimer, the coach of the Chiefs a long time ago, had the greatest saying in the world: ‘Enjoy the dickens out of it until midnight and then worry about that other team,'” he said.

North Carolina has reached the title game for the 10th time and it will be just the third appearance for Villanova.

The two schools have some tournament history with the Tarheels beating Villanova in the tournament on the way to their titles in 1982, 2005 and 2009.

They downed the Wildcats in the national semifinals in 2009 before beating Michigan State for the championship.

The Wildcats seemed to handle their easy win exactly the way a coach would hope a team with its biggest game to come would. Forward Daniel Ochefu, who was one of six Villanova players to score in double figures, insisted there was no postgame revelry after Saturday night’s victory.

“It was very businesslike,” he said. “No one was celebrating. Everyone understands that our next game on Monday we’ll be playing a great team and we’re not celebrating. We told each other at the end of the game that we have a lot of work to do. We can still get better.”

North Carolina also had a balanced scoring attack in its semifinal win with Brice Johnson and Justin Jackson adding 16 points each to go with 15 from Kennedy Meeks and Marcus Paige’s 13.

But it was the defensive effort of the Tar Heels that Williams was most excited about.

“The last four weeks we’ve been much, much better defensively,” he said. “We had a brain lapse there for about three minutes in the second half, but other than that I thought we were really good defensively against a team that’s hard to guard.”

The matchup on Monday could be interesting inside after both teams dominated in the paint on Saturday. Villanova outscored Oklahoma 38-20 inside and North Carolina had more points but the same margin by making 50 inside to 32 by Syracuse.

“Our main goal is to play a similar goal to what we played tonight, get the ball inside, really try to pound it in there and knock down our free throws,” Meeks said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

NCAA Final Four Preview: Future Stars And Past Transgressions

Oklahoma's Buddy Hield celebrates the Sooners' 77-63 win over Texas A&M in the third round of the NCAA tournament.

Oklahoma’s Buddy Hield celebrates the Sooners’ 77-63 win over Texas A&M in the third round of the NCAA tournament. Harry How/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Harry How/Getty Images

Future NBA stars? Check. Upset potential? Check. Academic fraud scandals? Double check. Saturday’s NCAA men’s basketball tournament Final Four games have it all.

No. 2 seeds Villanova and Oklahoma will square off for a spot in the championship game at 6:09 p.m. on TBS. When the teams played earlier this season, the Sooners routed the Wildcats 78-55. Will Villanova get its revenge?

The second semifinal game, airing on the same network right after ‘Nova versus Oklahoma, features No. 10 Syracuse trying to prolong its improbable tournament run by toppling No. 1 UNC. The run-up to this game, however, has been mostly focused on the programs’ off-the-court activities, as both teams are dealing with fallout from major academic fraud scandals.

Even though March has ended, the madness is at its peak. Here’s what you need to know about Saturday’s games.

No. 2 seed Villanova versus No. 2 seed Oklahoma

Ryan Arcidiacono after Villanova defeated Kansas 64-59 to reach the Final Four

Ryan Arcidiacono after Villanova defeated Kansas 64-59 to reach the Final Four Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Getty Images

  • Oklahoma’s senior sharpshooter Buddy Hield is widely regarded as the most complete player left in the tournament, and possibly in all of college basketball. He averaged 25.4 points per game this season and 29.3 points per game in the NCAA tournament so far. He scored 37 points in the Sooners’ win over No. 1 Oregon in the Elite Eight and he leads the NCAA in 3-pointers made, with 127. Hield’s accuracy and evident enjoyment of the game have earned him numerous comparisons to the NBA’s hottest player, Golden State Warriors star Steph Curry. The Washington Post compared the two players, saying, “The last time a college player looked this unstoppable was in 2008 when Stephen Curry helped carry Davidson to the Elite Eight.” Whether or not Hield lives up to this massive hype, it’s easy to imagine him making his mark on the NBA next season.
  • Hield is Oklahoma’s best shooter, but his teammates aren’t just standing idly by. As a team, Oklahoma makes 42.8 percent of its 3-pointers, the second-best rate in men’s college basketball this season, according to the NCAA.
  • Oklahoma may have trounced Villanova in December, but Villanova is a different team than it was earlier in the year. Need proof? Look at the Elite Eight game. The Wildcats beat No. 1 overall seed Kansas, holding one of the best programs in the country to a season-low 59 points. Led by senior Ryan Arcidiacono, who’s no slouch from the 3-point line, and junior Josh Hart, ‘Nova’s leading scorer and stalwart defender, the Wildcats will be an even match for Hield and Co.
  • Villanova is the winningest team in the NCAA over the last three seasons with 95 wins, according to ESPN. It says the senior class, including Arcidiacono and Daniel Ochefu, have 115 over four seasons.

No. 1 seed UNC versus No. 10 seed Syracuse

    Syracuse head coach Jim Boeheim was suspended for nine games last year when it was found that the basketball program had violated NCAA academic rules.

    Syracuse head coach Jim Boeheim was suspended for nine games last year when it was found that the basketball program had violated NCAA academic rules. Streeter Lecka/Getty Images hide caption

    toggle caption Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

    • Both of these teams have been found to have committed systematic and prolonged academic fraud. It’s difficult to talk about this matchup without delving into what it means to be a student-athlete, the role of amateurism in sports and the nature of the NCAA.
    • Syracuse, whose NCAA tournament invitation raised eyebrows considering its middling, 13-loss season in which the Orange lost five of their last six games, has turned itself into the Cinderella story of the tournament. Its scrappy underdog status, however, is marred by the fact it’s on probation for academic violations. Last year, Syracuse head coach Jim Boeheim was suspended for nine games by the NCAA and the team was stripped of 108 wins after an investigation dating back more than a decade revealed cash payouts to players, forged homework and other instances of wrongdoing. The program also self-imposed a postseason ban last year.
    • UNC, which has been one of the top teams in the country for most of the season, is facing its own academic fraud violations. Basketball players, as well as other athletes, enrolled in so-called paper classes, which didn’t really exist. The students simply needed to turn in a paper to get credit. And many of the papers, it was found, were written by people other than the student-athletes. Although the violations were brought to light more than a year ago, the program is still “under investigation.”
    • For more information, analysis and opinions on the programs’ wrongdoing and what it means for the NCAA, check out Pat Forde’s Yahoo Sports column “On Probation vs. Under Investigation: Final Four marred by schools with scandals,” CBS Sports’ “North Carolina Vs. Syracuse In The Final Four Is A Headache For The NCAA,” and The Associated Press’ take, “Final Four matchup as much about scandals as baskets.”

    Stay tuned for the women’s Final Four preview!

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    U.S. Women's Soccer Team Members File Wage Discrimination Complaint

    Five members of the U.S. women’s national soccer team have filed a federal complaint against the U.S. Soccer Federation, alleging wage discrimination.

    Transcript

    AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

    Five of the best-known members of the U.S. women’s soccer team have filed a federal complaint against the U.S. Soccer Federation. They accuse it of wage discrimination. Female soccer players, the complaint says, earn a fraction of what male players make and the women have had far more success on the field. NPR’s Nathan Rott reports.

    NATHAN ROTT, BYLINE: All right, let’s start with two approximate numbers. The first is 40 percent. That’s what a women’s soccer player that makes a World Cup team should expect to earn compared to a male counterpart, about 40 percent of what he makes according to the complaint that was filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

    The second number also listed in that complaint is 20 million, as in $20 million, which is how much more money in revenue the women’s team generated last year than the men’s. It’s numbers like that and the discrepancy between them that compelled the five U.S. women’s national soccer team players to file a federal wage discrimination complaint. Here’s the team’s co-captain Carli Lloyd in an interview with her teammates on NBC’s “Today.”

    (SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, “TODAY”)

    CARLI LLOYD: The pay disparity between the men and women is just too large.

    ROTT: The players are being represented by prominent sports attorney Jeffrey Kessler. He represented NFL star quarterback Tom Brady during the Deflategate inquiry and has worked on a number of other cases. He told NPR in an email that they believe they have a very strong case of blatant gender discrimination and that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will agree. Heidi Hartmann agrees. She’s president of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. And she says the difference in pay between male soccer players and female is egregious.

    HEIDI HARTMANN: We’re not talking about comparing ice skaters to football players. We’re talking about comparing soccer players to soccer players.

    ROTT: But Hartmann says it’s not necessarily surprising. She says federal wage data shows that there’s about a 21 percent gap between men’s and women’s pay in the U.S. overall. And the claim that men’s soccer players get everything from bigger bonuses to higher per diem than women on international trips is in line with other national trends too.

    HARTMANN: This is not uncommon in the rest of the business world. That – it just happens that men will get more of these bonuses and awards than women.

    ROTT: Hartmann says she’s hopeful that the tension brought to the issue by a group as popular as the U.S. women’s soccer team will help raise awareness. And it’s hard to argue with that popularity.

    (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

    UNIDENTIFIED CROWD: (Chanting) USA, USA, USA.

    ROTT: It wasn’t all that long ago that the U.S. women’s soccer team was doing their victory lap around the country in front of thousands of fans at rallies like this one in Downtown Los Angeles.

    (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

    UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: World Cup champions.

    (APPLAUSE)

    ROTT: When the U.S. women won their third World Cup last year, the final became the most-watched soccer game in U.S. history, men or women. But it’s fair to say that the relationship between U.S. soccer and the women’s team is already strained. U.S. soccer sued the women’s national team players’ union last month over a contract dispute over their collective bargaining agreement.

    In a statement regarding this issue, U.S. soccer says its efforts to be advocates for women’s soccer are unwavering and it says it’s committed to negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement that addresses compensation with the Women’s National Team’s Players Association at the end of this year. In a tweet responding to that statement, U.S. soccer co-captain Becky Sauerbrunn says, quote, “where in the statement do they address or even attempt to refute the pay discrepancy?” She ends it with the hashtag Equal Play Equal Pay. Nathan Rott, NPR News.

    Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

    NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    UConn Women's Basketball Team Confronts Consequences Of Being 'Too Good'

    The University of Connecticut women’s basketball team is destroying the competition. In fact, this year, there hasn’t been any competition. But as the Huskies are closing in on their fourth consecutive title, the lack of competition is hurting the women’s game. NPR’s Audie Cornish talks to David Ubben of the website “Sports on Earth.”

    Transcript

    AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

    This year’s University of Connecticut women’s basketball team is the stuff of video games, not real life. The Huskies are beating teams by an average of 40 points. The three-time defending champion is undefeated heading into this weekend’s final four, and they’re on a 73-game winning streak. And as everyone expects UConn to win its record fourth consecutive title, there’s some that wonder if being this good is actually a bad thing for women’s basketball. Joining us now is David Ubben. He covers college sports for the website Sports on Earth. Welcome to the program.

    DAVID UBBEN: Thanks. I’m glad to be here.

    CORNISH: So Dan Shaughnessy of the Boston Glove riled up the Internet when he tweeted during UConn’s 60-point victory over Mississippi State in the Sweet 16. He said, quote, “hate to punish them for being great, but they’re killing women’s game. Watch? No thanks.” OK, so, David Ubben, this is a seriously backhanded compliment. What’s going on here?

    UBBEN: I think a lot of people do believe, when you have teams that are this far out in front of the pack, it’s like running a marathon where the guy that’s ahead is, you know, five miles ahead of anyone else that’s on the track. It’s kind of pointless to watch.

    CORNISH: What? We love that guy. That guy’s the greatest runner ever. That’s why we watch it.

    UBBEN: In theory. You know, this is not a dynamic that’s limited to women’s basketball. I think when you have things that are this dominant, when they aren’t unprecedented, people tune out.

    CORNISH: All right. Well, coach Geno Auriemma was asked about Shaughnessy’s comments after another recent tournament rout. Here’s how he responded.

    (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

    GENO AURIEMMA: When Tiger was winning every major, nobody said he was bad for golf. Actually, he did a lot for golf. He made everybody have to be a better golfer.

    CORNISH: So what’s your answer to this?

    UBBEN: It’s not a great argument. Tiger Woods isn’t recruiting the best golf balls and the best golf clubs to come play for him. Tiger Woods is the golfer. And when he plays, he’s not preventing anyone else from getting better. But Geno Auriemma has to recruit, every single year, the best women’s players in the country. So when he gets a good player, somebody else doesn’t get a good player. And so when you’re asking everyone to improve your game, well, you could start by handing off some of those good players to other programs. And that’s a ludicrous request, but UConn’s still going to be out in front as long as Geno keeps getting the best players and developing the best players. It’s a credit to them, but it’s still not helping the women’s game.

    CORNISH: What do you say to women, especially young women players, who hear this and may think that this kind of argument from Shaughnessy and others is essentially sexism passed off as sports opinion, right? I mean, the idea being that women – we don’t want to watch them. They’re not as good, until they’re really good, and then we say we don’t to watch them because they’re really good. I mean, this is – this is seeming very much like a catch-22.

    UBBEN: Yeah, I think there’s certainly something to that. And I think it’s a tough line because I think that it’s hard to sort out. And a lot of times, it’s hard to have honest conversations about, how do we improve the women’s game? How do we fix these issues without sort of being drowned out by, well, you’re being a sexist.

    CORNISH: In the meantime, is there any chance that UConn could use lose this weekend to Oregon State in the national semifinals or in a title game?

    UBBEN: No.

    CORNISH: Are you still going to watch?

    UBBEN: (Laughter). I’ll probably tune in. That’s one thing that Geno Auriemma is unbelievable about doing. He keeps his team invested. They’re competing against themselves. We want to be as good as we can be. It’s incredible to watch. Geno Auriemma is a fantastic coach – one of the best in the history of the game.

    CORNISH: That’s David Ubben. He covers college sports for the website Sports on Earth. Thanks so much.

    UBBEN: Thank you, appreciate it.

    Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

    NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    World Cup Qualifying: U.S. Men's Team — And Its Coach — Get Much-Needed Win

    United States players celebrate a goal against Guatemala during the second half of a World Cup qualifying soccer match Tuesday in Columbus, Ohio. The United States beat Guatemala 4-0.

    United States players celebrate a goal against Guatemala during the second half of a World Cup qualifying soccer match Tuesday in Columbus, Ohio. The United States beat Guatemala 4-0. Jay LaPrete/AP hide caption

    toggle caption Jay LaPrete/AP

    The U.S. men’s national soccer team beat Guatemala 4-0 Tuesday night in a crucial World Cup qualifying game in Columbus, Ohio. With the victory, the U.S. will advance to the next round of qualifying for the 2018 World Cup in Russia.

    Striker Clint Dempsey scored in the 12th minute to give the U.S. the early lead. Defender Geoff Cameron then managed to get on the end of a free kick from midfielder Michael Bradley to head the second goal home in the 35th minute.

    U.S. coach Jürgen Klinsmann studies the play during a World Cup qualifier between his squad and Trinidad and Tobago in November in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.

    U.S. coach Jürgen Klinsmann studies the play during a World Cup qualifier between his squad and Trinidad and Tobago in November in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. Ashley Allen/Getty Images hide caption

    toggle caption Ashley Allen/Getty Images

    Just after halftime, midfielder Graham Zusi leveled a low shot to the left corner to give the U.S. a comfortable 3-0 lead. But the U.S. wasn’t letting up.

    In the 85 minute, it looked like the U.S. had scored again when forward Jozy Altidore slid a pass to a streaking Ethan Finlay who hammered it home, but the play was called offside — a dubious call upon examination of the replay.

    Altidore made up for it, burying a shot in the top left corner just before the final whistle.

    Overall, the U.S. played like a completely different team than the one that was trounced 2-0 in by Guatemala in Guatemala City on Friday, in a performance that soccer commentator Craig Burley called “an utter shambles.”

    Friday’s loss was the first time that the United States had lost to Guatemala in 21 games, and the latest in a number of disappointments for the U.S. while playing teams such as Jamaica, Brazil, Mexico and Costa Rica. A loss Tuesday would’ve all but kept the U.S. out of the World Cup for the first time since 1986.

    Much of the blame for the team’s spotty performance has been laid at the feet of coach Jürgen Klinsmann, one of the most famous names in international soccer. He was part of the German team that won the World Cup in 1990, and played for some of the world’s top teams — including AC Milan, Tottenham Hotspur and Bayern Munich. As a manager, he coached the German national team to a third-place finish in the 2006 World Cup.

    So it seemed like quite a coup when U.S. Soccer Federation signed Klinsmann to coach the men’s national team in July 2011. Although the U.S. made it to the Round of 16 in the World Cup in Brazil two years ago, his tenure has been controversial. Klinsmann has many defenders, but even some of those, such as SB Nation’s Bill Connelly, admit the overall record has been mixed.

    Commentators like Graham Parker blame frequent changes in lineup and strategy. “The team feels as if it exists in a permanently provisional state,” he wrote in The Guardian on Saturday, and a number of others agree with the sentiment in this LA Times headline today: “Another loss to Guatemala could spell the end for U.S. soccer coach Jürgen Klinsmann”

    In fact, before Tuesday night’s game, a banner flew over the stadium calling for Klinsmann to be fired. According to ESPN, the banner read “#FIREKLINSMANN HE’S A TINY LITTLE BIT BEHIND,” a mocking reference to Klinsmann’s explanation for why he left some players, like former U.S.-team captain Landon Donovan, off the 2014 World Cup roster.

    The decisive win for the U.S. may give Klinsmann some breathing room for the final round of regional qualifying, which will begin in November.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    In Vast FIFA Scandal, Ex-President Of Honduras Pleads Guilty To Taking Bribes

    Former Honduran President Rafael Callejas leaves federal court in New York City on Monday after pleading guilty to conspiracy charges in a wide-ranging FIFA soccer scandal.

    Former Honduran President Rafael Callejas leaves federal court in New York City on Monday after pleading guilty to conspiracy charges in a wide-ranging FIFA soccer scandal. Richard Drew/AP hide caption

    toggle caption Richard Drew/AP

    In the latest development in the FIFA soccer scandal, Rafael Callejas, a former president of Honduras and the head of the country’s soccer federation from 2002 to 2015, pleaded guilty to corruption charges. He had been accused of taking bribes in steering lucrative broadcast rights.

    According to the Department of Justice, Callejas “negotiated and accepted bribes totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for his agreement to exercise his influence as the president of [the Honduran soccer federation] to award contracts to Media World, a Florida sports marketing company.”

    The contracts covered the “media and marketing rights to the Honduran national soccer team’s home World Cup qualifier matches for the 2014, 2018, and 2022 editions of the World Cup,” the DOJ said in a statement.

    In federal court in Brooklyn, N.Y., on Monday, Callejas pleaded guilty to charges of racketeering conspiracy and wire fraud conspiracy.

    NPR’s Hansi Lo Wang reports that Callejas faces up to four decades in prison and has agreed to forfeit $650,000. Callejas is set to be sentenced in August.

    According to The Associated Press, Callejas “told the judge that he had accepted bribes and distributed some of the money to others. He said he knew it was wrong.”

    The disgraced leader, who was president of Honduras from 1990 to 1994, also agreed to forfeit $650,000.

    His guilty plea is the latest victory in the fight against corruption in the world soccer governing body. Last May, the U.S. indicted 14 FIFA officials, seven of whom were arrested at a hotel in Zurich, Switzerland. Then in December, the U.S. indicted an additional 16 defendants. As the Two-Way reported at the time:

    “Seven officials named in [the] announcement are from North America’s soccer federation, CONCACAF, and nine are from South America’s federation, CONMEBOL. Of the 16 new defendants, all of whom are facing charges including racketeering, five are current or former members of the FIFA executive committee.”

    In the December crackdown, the AP notes, those five current and former members of the executive committee were arrested at the same Zurich hotel where the arrest of the seven FIFA officials occurred six months earlier.

    The news service adds that “the Justice Department has said that numerous guilty pleas in the case have resulted in agreements to forfeit over $190 million, and another $100 million has been restrained in the U.S. and abroad.”

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    Is March Losing Its Madness?

    4:25

    Download

    The Elite Eight of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament is set, and this year’s games have been as exciting as usual. But ESPN’s Howard Bryant tells NPR’s Scott Simon the meaning of the tournament may be changing.

    Transcript

    SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

    You know what I missed when I was away for a few weeks? The chance to say time for sports.

    (SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

    SIMON: Actually, I said it a lot, but people on the subway just looked away. Listen, we’re deep into March Madness – and not just the presidential campaign. Last night in the men’s NCAA tournament, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Virginia and Syracuse advanced. Tonight, the round of eight begins. We’re joined now by Howard Bryant of ESPN.com and ESPN The Magazine. Howard, so good to hear your voice, my friend.

    HOWARD BRYANT: Good morning, Scott. It’s been a while.

    SIMON: Four big games last night, with Virginia and North Carolina winning. They join Kansas and Oregon in the Elite Eight. That means all four No. 1 seeds are still alive. We don’t see that a lot, do we?

    BRYANT: Well, I think what we don’t see is a lot of the top, top seeds making it. We don’t see the 2s and the 3s getting there as well the way you had a 1 and a 2 play. And, like, the way you’re going to have a 1 and a 2 in Villanova and Kansas play today. But the top seeds seem to get there a little more often, which tells you about the gap between the very, very good teams and the – and the rest of the field.

    But those – those 2 and 15 and 3 and 14 upsets seem to be coming more and more and more common. However, I am very much looking forward to when you see North Carolina last night beating Indiana by 15.

    SIMON: Yeah.

    BRYANT: They scored 100 points. And I think that Villanova and North Carolina are the best teams. But the top team in the country, Kansas, is playing Villanova today…

    SIMON: Yes.

    BRYANT: …A game that I’m really looking forward to.

    SIMON: And of course, Oregon versus Oklahoma – what do you see there?

    BRYANT: In Oregon-Oklahoma – Oregon is a great team, and they’re fun to watch. And they took out Duke, which is one of the great blue-chip – Oregon, you know, one of the great blue-chip programs. But a West Coast team taking on one of the big dogs like that is also something new. Let’s see if they can keep it going too. A lot of people like that team a lot. I didn’t think that they were national championship material. But they – they shoot the ball well enough, and they played a lot of good defense, and they’re big. And so it’ll be fun to see what they do as well.

    SIMON: You mentioned Duke having one of the blue-chip programs. And I want to get you – I want to draw you out something. I’ll confess, you and I were chatting yesterday afternoon. There have been big moments and buzzer beaters in this tournament, but has the tournament lost a lot of its character?

    BRYANT: Well, I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately and especially when I think about Ben Simmons, the purported No. 1 – the projected No. 1 coming out of LSU. He’s supposed to be the best player in the country. His team didn’t even make the tournament. It’s the first time in a quarter century that the projected number one player didn’t even play in the NCAA tournament. And it made me think more and more about the changing nature of this tournament. It’s that we remember – I remember, obviously, as do you, when the tournament wasn’t just about buzzer beaters. It was also about looking at the great, great players and how they were going to translate into the NBA – when you had Patrick Ewing and Hakeem Olajuwon playing for championships and the Fab Five Michigan teams and the Duke teams – that’s all gone now. Because now, the best players in the game – they’re gone after one year.

    SIMON: Yeah.

    BRYANT: You see that in Kentucky John Calipari encouraged his entire team to go pro. Every player that was eligible to go to the NBA – he said that they should go pro, so that changes everything. You’re not going to get those great two – three-year rivalries like you did with UNLV and Duke. It’s all different now. And so the tournament is sort of sensation. Is that enough for most fans? I think people filling out their brackets, it’s plenty. But for me, as someone who likes to watch the game as well as project some of these great players, it’s not the same as it used to be because these – these top, top players – you’re only going to see them one year. It’s not like you’re going to see Ralph Sampson and James Worthy play each other two or three years, that – those days are over.

    SIMON: Well, that – and that’s why we can – we can take another 15 seconds. Great programs are a harder thing to achieve now because the personnel is gone within a year.

    BRYANT: That’s right. And no – and then when you see that, you don’t have upsets anymore because the great teams aren’t as great as they used to be.

    SIMON: Howard Bryant of ESPN.com and ESPN The Magazine – Howard, thanks. By the way, you know who writes our theme music?

    BRYANT: (Laughter) Yes, we do.

    SIMON: OK, go ahead. Say the name.

    BRYANT: It’s BJ, isn’t it?

    SIMON: BJ Leiderman.

    BRYANT: That’s right.

    SIMON: All right. You’re listening to WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News.

    Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

    NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    Soccer Wins Over New Generation Of Fans In Cuba

    3:12

    Download

    President Obama took in a baseball game during his trip to Havana this week, but soccer is encroaching on Cuba’s national pastime, especially with young people.

    Transcript

    AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

    Before President Obama’s trip to Argentina this week, he capped off his historic visit to Cuba by taking in the island’s national sport, baseball. It was a matchup between two former foes – Cuba’s national team and the Tampa Bay Rays. Baseball might be as Cuban as cigars and rum, but the game is losing popularity. Soccer is winning-over new fans and exposing a generation gap, as NPR’s Carrie Kahn reports.

    CARRIE KAHN, BYLINE: On the outskirts of Havana, two teams are locked in a hard-fought game on a weathered baseball field.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: All the action, though, is in left and center field, which is now host to a soccer game. Move over, baseball – soccer has come to Cuba in a big way. In recent years at local parks and plazas, you see less and less of the pelota – or, baseball – as the national sport is affectionately called.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: As a coach puts these under-10 soccer players through a series of drills on the field, a few dads look on.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: One of them, Jorge Luis Obret, says soccer is booming in Cuba. When he was a kid, it was all baseball. But with one soccer ball, he says, 15 to 20 guys can play. In baseball, you need a lot more.

    JORGE LUIS OBRET: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: “You need bats, gloves, a lot of stuff. It’s cheaper to play soccer,” he says. And a slew of deflections of Cuban stars has depleted the national baseball team. Twenty-eight Cuban-born players now fill the 2016 major league baseball roster. Adding to the soccer fervor, Cuban TV now plays soccer matches. T-shirts of Real, Madrid, Barcelona, and other soccer clubs are seen all over the island, something unheard of just five years ago. Conrado Dimsa Aguayis sports a blue-and-white jersey of the Argentine national team while out strolling in Havana with his girlfriend.

    CONRADO DIMSA AGUAYIS: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: He says he’d rather play baseball but it’s easier to find a soccer game to join. Younger Cubans are only interested in soccer, he adds. Like 14-year-old Miguel Marzocintra, who’s at a Havana pickup game.

    MIGUEL MARZOCINTRA: (Foreign language spoken).

    UNIDENTIFIED BOY: (Foreign language spoken).

    MIGUEL: (Foreign language spoken).

    KAHN: Soccer is more active. He says, “in baseball, you just stand around and it’s boring.” This generation gap isn’t just in sports. Tonight the Rolling Stones give a free concert in Havana. While older Cubans know the British legends well, younger Cubans like these soccer-happy teens are clueless.

    Los Rolling Stones?

    And give that ubiquitous teenage shoulder shrug no when pressed. But amidst Cuba’s changing times, The Stones and baseball still bring satisfaction to many of the island’s old-timers.

    (SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “I CAN’T GET NO SATISFACTION”)

    THE ROLLING STONES: (Singing) I can’t get no satisfaction.

    KAHN: Carrie Kahn, NPR News, Havana.

    (SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “I CAN’T GET NO SATISFACTION”)

    THE ROLLING STONES: (Singing) I can’t get no satisfaction ’cause I try, and I try, and I try and I try. I can’t get no, I can’t get no…

    Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

    NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)


    No Image

    'Fastball' Documentary Explores Classic Showdown Between Pitcher And Batter

    8:02

    Download

    The new documentary Fastball explores the classic showdown between pitcher and batter. NPR’s Robert Siegel talks with director Jonathan Hock about his film, and with David Price, a left-handed pitcher for the Boston Red Sox.

    Transcript

    ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

    In September 2010, Aroldis Chapman, a rookie relief pitcher with the Cincinnati Reds, made history. A fastball he threw in the eighth inning of a game in San Diego was clocked at 105.1 miles per hour. It was the fastest pitch ever recorded in the major leagues, and it added to a century of lore and legend about the fastball.

    (SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FASTBALL”)

    TIMOTHY VERSTYNEN: The pitcher is pushing the limits of how fast a ball can go. And that limit is coming close to the limit of how fast a hitter can make a decision. And so you have these two extremes of human performance doing this kind of dance right at the edge of where their biology is constraining them.

    SIEGEL: That’s psychologist Timothy Verstynen of Carnegie Mellon University. The science, history and sheer marvel of the game’s fastest pitch are explored in a new documentary called “Fastball.” Jonathan Hock wrote and directed the film and joins us from New York. Welcome to the program, Jonathan.

    JONATHAN HOCK: Thank you, Robert.

    SIEGEL: And the film features scientists like Verstynen and several players, including left-handed pitcher David Price of the Boston Red Sox who joins us from Fort Meyers, Fla., where his team spends spring training. Welcome to you, David Price.

    DAVID PRICE: Thank you very much.

    SIEGEL: Let’s start, Jonathan, with you. How fast is a great fastball?

    HOCK: You know, there are a lot of guys throwing 98, a hundred now, and that used to be blinding speed, and now it’s kind of typical of what’s coming out of the bullpen. But there’s a lot more to it than just speed – release point, movement, late movement, especially

    SIEGEL: David Price, there’s a moment in the documentary where we see you striking out a man and throwing a ball, according to the speed gun, 100 miles per hour. What was that like?

    PRICE: That was a first for me. I remember that moment very clearly, you know? I was in the bottom of the fifth. You know, my pitch count was at a hundred or higher, so I knew this was – you know, it was probably my last hitter.

    I think it was a two-two count, and you know, just threw a good fastball up in the leg. He swung through it. And I just remember walking off the field to the first-base dugout. And I looked up ’cause they had a radar gun reading right there and in Detroit above our dugout, and I saw 100. But that was special.

    SIEGEL: When you threw that pitch, could you feel that there was something different about this fastball from a fastball that might be clocked in at 97 miles per hour?

    PRICE: No, I didn’t feel any different. You know, I like to kind of play it to golf. You know, a lot of the golfers on the – on tour, you know, they’re not – they’re never swinger a hundred percent. You know, very rarely will they ever really go at a golf ball unless they really need to.

    And you know, less is more. And I feel like if I can keep my mechanics in line and just get on top of that baseball, you know, I can still throw the baseball just as hard as if I was to hump up and try and really get after it.

    SIEGEL: I want to play a couple of clips from “Fastball,” from the film, that address the question of, say, the difference between a 92-mile-per-hour fastball and a 100-mile-per-hour fastball. First, at one point, the narrator, Kevin Costner, delivers a scientific comparison.

    (SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FASTBALL”)

    KEVIN COSTNER: If the two pitches were thrown together, when the 100-mile-an-hour pitch reaches home plate, the 92-mile-an-hour pitch would still have 4-and-a-half feet left to travel.

    SIEGEL: So that’s the result of serious calculations. Brandon Phillips, the second baseman of the Cincinnati Reds, describes being a batter and looking at the difference between a 92-mile-per-hour pitch and a hundred-mile-per-hour pitch. He describes it a little bit differently.

    (SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “FASTBALL”)

    BRANDON PHILLIPS: When you’re thrown a 92, you can read the Major League logo on the ball. You can see the seams. You can see all that. But when the guy throwing a hundred…

    (CHEERING)

    PHILLIPS: …It look like a golf ball.

    SIEGEL: (Laughter) It looks like a golf ball, David Price – back to golf.

    PRICE: (Laughter) That definitely makes sense. You know, whenever you see a guy throwing, you know, upper-90s, a lot of people say that the baseball looks about the size of a bb, so I definitely get what he’s saying there.

    SIEGEL: One of the questions that you address – the big question that you address in “Fastball,” Jonathan, is who actually threw the fastest fastball. And I was very surprised to learn how different the methods have been for measuring the speed of a fastball. Nowadays we have this radar gun that’s measuring it. But before that, it was a much more random kind of science.

    HOCK: Yeah. We sort of took it for granted when we began the project that the, you know, the current timings were just sort of the same as anything that had ever been timed before and when Aroldis Chapman hit 105.1, that was it.

    But what we discovered with the help of the scientists from Carnegie Mellon – that the method they used over the years to scientifically time some pitchers, which hadn’t happened that often before the radar gun – but it did happen, and the methods they did use were accurate. But the way they set it up was a little bit lacking.

    SIEGEL: In 1939, as the movie shows us, Bob Feller, the great pitcher for the Cleveland Indians, wanted to be timed.

    HOCK: Bob Feller was the first pitcher who really wanted to know how fast his fastball went. And he tried many ways of measuring this. And the first one and the most amusing one to watch is – he literally races his fastball against a police motorcycle. They filmed this. It was in Chicago. And you see this cop racing in on a motorcycle, going 86 miles an hour.

    And just as he passes Feller, Feller, with his eye on the cop, winds up and lets go of the ball. And Feller’s fastball hits the target before the cop going 86 miles an hour. And then Feller was in his street clothes, you know, with hard-soled shoes, pitching on the street without a mound.

    SIEGEL: (Laughter) There’s a scientific consensus in this film that a fastball cannot rise.

    HOCK: Yeah. The idea is that when we’re tracking an object in motion, we’re not actually looking directly at the object. We’re looking slightly ahead of it – a tenth, two-tenths of a second ahead of where it goes, and our brain then fills in the missing frames. And when we anticipate a ball going the normal speed – say, 90, 92 – our eye, as a batter, races to the spot where a 92-mile-an-hour pitch will cross home plate, and we swing there.

    The hundred-mile-an-hour pitch thrown as a four-seamer, as David describes in the film, with backspin is going to create what they call Magnus force, which creates a slight lift on the ball. It doesn’t actually lift the ball, but the ball won’t fall. So it crosses the plate higher than the batter expects it to, and so his – he’s literally seeing the ball rise because whatever part of his brain is interpreting what his eyes are seeing is actually making the ball rise.

    SIEGEL: David, are you persuaded by what Jonathan just said, explaining the – what he would say is the illusion of the rising fastball?

    PRICE: I really don’t think the baseball can rise, but if there’s anybody in baseball that could do that, it would be Darren O’Day just from, you know, his arm spot of where he throws and then him still being able to generate, you know, 87, you know, to 90 mile an hour that gives that look of that.

    SIEGEL: We’re on the eve of a new Major League Baseball season. Jonathan Hock, David Price, how exciting is that for the two of you?

    PRICE: This time of year, you know, before the season gets going is always exciting. And then to be throwing with a new team and a new organization – that’s always exciting as well.

    HOCK: For me, the – baseball is the soundtrack of my summers for 50 years now. And there are two kinds of life we live every year. The six months where every night we can turn on the radio and put a ballgame on in the background is – that’s the half of life I prefer.

    SIEGEL: Filmmaker Jonathan Hock, whose new document is called “Fastball,” and David Price, whose new team is the Boston Red Sox, thanks to both of you for talking with us.

    HOCK: Thank you, Robert.

    PRICE: Not a problem, thank you.

    (SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

    SIEGEL: The documentary “Fastball” opens nationwide this weekend, and it’s available On Demand.

    Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

    NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

    Let’s block ads! (Why?)