Business

No Image

Cold-o-nomics

Frigid temperatures arrived in the Upper Midwest with a polar vortex. In Chicago on Wednesday, Marius Radoi walked along a freezing Lake Michigan.

Joshua Lott/AFP/Getty Images

Climate change is snowballing into more extreme weather. Between hurricanes, tornadoes, and yes, polar vortices, life on earth is becoming increasingly disrupted by weather conditions. And that can get expensive. Today on The Indicator, we look at how extreme weather can affect the economy, and what the most costly climate conditions can be.

Music by Drop Electric. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Super Bowl Ads 2019: Stunts, Self-Deprecation And Celebrity Sightings

Harrison Ford and a dog stand in front of a house in a still from an Amazon commercial that ran during the 2019 Super Bowl.

Amazon YouTube

Pepsi should have chosen a different slogan for its ads during this year’s Super Bowl.

The company’s slogan was “More than okay.” Well, not really. In fact, most of the high-priced commercials we saw between the football plays were just OK. They were so careful to avoid scandal and backlash they felt leached of originality or bite.

That’s pretty much what Greg Lyons, Chief Marketing Officer of PepsiCo Beverages North America, predicted when I asked him last week what this year’s spots would look like: nothing controversial.

“The Super Bowl is a time for people to enjoy themselves and enjoy the ads,” Lyons said, deftly avoiding direct mention of the elephant in this particular room — allegations that the NFL blackballed former quarterback Colin Kaepernick for his silent protests over social justice issues, leading to the hashtag #Imwithkap trending before the big game started.

Super Bowl ad time was costly — CBS charged up to $5.3 million for each 30 seconds of time — so the commercials sidestepped anything that might offend. That left viewers with a lot of spots centered on emotional tributes to first responders and soldiers, artificial intelligence and robots acting out and awkward celebrity cameos. One example: Charlie Sheen, reading a newspaper as Mr. Peanut speeds by in a car shaped like a peanut, looking up to say, “and people think I’m nuts.” Really.

Here’s my take on what worked — and so much more that didn’t — on the world’s biggest showcase for TV advertising:

Best argument for a free press: “The Washington Post Spot” “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”

Yeah, as a journalist and sometime media critic, I’m a little biased. And at a time when journalists are enduring layoffs across many outlets the price of a Super Bowl ad may seem foolish. But The Washington Post spot reminded us how journalism informs every facet of our lives, with clips of fallen reporters like Marie Colvin and Jamal Khashoggi with the reassuring voice of Tom Hanks telling viewers “knowing keeps us free.” Would an “enemy of the people” do that? I don’t think so.

[embedded content]


The Washington Post
YouTube

Best mashup of two things that probably shouldn’t be mashed up: Bud Light and HBO’s Game of Thrones.

Last year, Bud Light featured a bunch of ads in a medieval setting with characters saying the catchphrase “dilly, dilly.” This year, they upped the ante by showing one of their Bud Light knights killed in a jousting contest by a character from Game of Thrones — The Mountain — before a dragon from the show sets everyone on fire. I’ll give Bud Light points for teaming up with a cool, highly anticipated TV event. But in a Super Bowl advertising environment that’s mostly about humor and sentimentality, selling your beer with a commercial that shows scores of people getting killed feels a bit, well, off brand.

[embedded content]


HBO
YouTube

Good try making the best of a bad thing: “Is Pepsi OK?”

Props to the company for not shying away from something that could be considered a serious weakness: the fact that wait staff often ask customers “Is Pepsi OK?” when customers ask for a Coke, but the restaurant serves only Pepsi products. The ad featured Steve Carell berating a waiter before rappers Cardi B and Lil Jon show up bellowing the word “okay” in their signature styles. Carell’s patter did feel a little like watching your dad joke about a pop music video. But at least he admits trying to cop Cardi B’s style is probably a bad idea.

[embedded content]


Pepsi
YouTube

Best use of celebrities: Harrison Ford, Forest Whitaker, Abbi Jacobson, Ilana Glazer, Mark and Scott Kelly Cope with Amazon Fails

Give Amazon points for making Harrison Ford’s increasingly curmudgeonly style look charming. The premise of the ad is simple: after showing off a microwave with Alexa, the commercial features celebrities trying other Alexa/Amazon products that didn’t turn out so well. It’s cute seeing Forest Whitaker struggle to hear a podcast through an Alexa-enabled toothbrush stuck in his mouth, while the stars of Broad City, Jacobson and Glazer, get accidentally ejected from an Alexa-powered hot tub. But it’s Ford jousting with his dog, who keeps ordering stuff through his Alexa-outfitted dog collar, who steals the show. (I think he just might have found his partner for the next Indiana Jones movie.)

[embedded content]


amazon
YouTube

Worst use of a celebrity: Jason Bateman for Hyundai

Jason Bateman is an under-appreciated talent with a skill for serving up dry humor. So it’s sad to see Hyundai stick him in a role anyone could have played: an elevator operator descending with a car-shopping couple, going past floors with awful activities like getting a root canal or attending a vegan dinner party, until they finally land in the basement, where there’s a car dealership. Frankly, I expected him to pass a floor where people were watching this commercial, which might have rescued the whole thing.

[embedded content]


Hyundai
YouTube

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Laundromats Fold In Learning Spaces For Busy Families

Some laundromat owners are teaming up with libraries to provide books, toys and even story time for kids forced to tag along on laundry day.



MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

We had planned to bring you a conversation with the editor of the conservative website that first published that controversial photo from the medical school yearbook of the Virginia governor, Ralph Northam, but we are having technical difficulties. We’ll try to bring you that conversation as soon as we can. But first let’s go to the laundromat, where the average visit takes 2 1/2 hours. That time is not easy on working families with kids. But Allyson McCabe takes us to Queens, N.Y., where there is a growing effort to help families use laundry time to get more than just clean clothes.

ALLYSON MCCABE, BYLINE: The laundry must be done. But if you don’t have access to a washer and dryer in your home, chances are that means spending a lot of time at a self-service laundromat.

(SOUNDBITE OF MACHINE WHIRLING)

MCCABE: Nadine Pineda (ph) says that’s tough, especially with an active 16-month-old toddler in tow.

NADINE PINEDA: It’s – my working schedule is, like, off the charts, so I try to do laundry when I can.

MCCABE: Pineda says most laundromats don’t have anywhere for her son to play while she does the laundry. But at Lavanderia XI, there’s a comfy couch, toys and lots of books in English and Spanish.

PINEDA: I saw this. I was like, what? I’m like – it’s really the first laundromat that I’ve seen that has a center like this for kids. I think that more laundromats should reinforce this sort of idea not only because it helps the children but because it also helps the parents in a way.

MCCABE: Brian Wallace is president and CEO of the Coin Laundry Association. He says there are about 30,000 laundromats nationwide, and families with limited time and money make up a large share of their customers.

BRIAN WALLACE: And they’re coming to us with, you know, anywhere from, you know, 50 pounds of laundry to maybe a hundred or even a couple hundred pounds of laundry, depending on the size of their family.

MCCABE: All that laundry can run hundreds of dollars a month. So Wallace’s trade group formed a foundation to sponsor events, like free laundry days and food giveaways. Eventually, it started giving away books, and that sparked an idea. Last fall, it partnered with Libraries Without Borders and a Clinton Foundation program to bring learning spaces into laundromats. Queens Library outreach assistant Hal Schrieve says the new space allows families to use laundry time to boost learning, literacy and more.

HAL SCHRIEVE: A lot of times, families are here and focused on chores, and maybe kids are, like, watching the TVs or just kind of, like, hanging out. And I think the goal of this space, too, is to make sure that kids’ time in laundromats is being used to do creative things or to learn and to give families time to interact with each other.

MCCABE: Families like the Ramoses (ph), who come here every week.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: We have a laundromat around the corner of our house, and we travel six blocks just to get to this particular one because of the space, so…

SCHRIEVE: (Singing) I and J and tag-along K all on their way up the coconut tree.

MCCABE: On a recent Sunday morning, a group of kids gathered to hear Schrieve lead a reading activity while others played with puppets, blocks and literacy-themed coloring pages.

SCHRIEVE: (Singing) Chicka-chicka, boom boom. Will there be enough room? Look, who’s coming. Can you read these letters?

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: Yeah.

MCCABE: Laundromat owner Jose Almonte says the learning space has given him an edge over nearby competitors, a win-win for the community and his business.

JOSE ALMONTE: The kids run to that area to play, to color. I mean, it’s entertainment.

MCCABE: As the pilot expands this spring, similar programs are planned at laundromats across the country, all part of a growing effort aimed at meeting busy families where they are.

For NPR News, in Queens, N.Y., I’m Allyson McCabe.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Lesson In Classic Fair Division Problems And The Solutions

Fairly dividing goods is one of the hardest problems economists face. NPR’s Planet Money talks to economists about how best to solve it.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

The recent government shutdown was in part a battle over how to fairly divide federal resources. This problem is one of fair division. Fair division is its own area of study, from how to fairly split rent between roommates to how to pick a movie and a group. Problems of fair division crop up all the time. Sally Herships from our Planet Money podcast walks us through some classic fair division problems and their solutions.

SALLY HERSHIPS, BYLINE: Recently, I ran an informal economic study. I presented a sealed cardboard box to two 10-year-old girls, then I backed way up.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #1: Oh, my God. It’s got candy on it.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #2: Marshmallows.

HERSHIPS: Inside the box with a cake with a lot of candy on it. I asked the girls to figure out how to fairly divide it.

How do you both feel about the marshmallows?

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #1: I love marshmallows. I don’t really like Skittles, though. But they do…

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #2: I love Skittles. But they do make different flavors if you combine them.

HERSHIPS: This problem is called fair division. Luckily, there is a solution – divide and choose.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #1: If one person cuts it and the other person decide – what – gets what, then it could be equal.

HERSHIPS: We see fair division problems all the time. How do you split a property after a divorce, profits in a business, runway space at an airport? Constantinos Daskalakis, or Costis, is an expert in game theory at MIT. He says there are some basics like the rental harmony problem. He asks Planet Money reporter Kenny Malone and I to imagine we have an apartment with two bedrooms. One is big, but it has no closet; the other does, but it’s small.

CONSTANTINOS DASKALAKIS: Maybe, you know, I value a smaller room that has a closet, but you value more a big room that – because you like space.

HERSHIPS: I’m taking the closet.

KENNY MALONE, BYLINE: Yeah, I don’t need the closet. It’s fine. I wear the same jeans every day for two weeks in a row.

DASKALAKIS: OK. Thanks for sharing. So, like, yeah, so the question is, you know, who gets what? But also, how is rent split?

HERSHIPS: Say the rent is $2,000. The roommates need to figure out what percentage of that they think each room is worth.

DASKALAKIS: Maybe for you, two rooms are equal. But for Kenny, big space is so much more valuable that he says, look, you know, I don’t care about the closet at all. I don’t even have clothes, OK. So what I care about is the space. So the protocol that we use with my roommate was – and it’s a classical one – each of the two roommates in a sealed envelope writes what they consider to be the right split, what they consider to be the right values of the two rooms.

HERSHIPS: And what they found, Costis’ roommate was willing to pay more for the big room – $1,400. Costis was willing to pay 1,000 for either.

DASKALAKIS: So each of us get the room where they’re the highest bidder. However, how much do we pay? We pay the average of the two prices.

HERSHIPS: So Costis only has to pay $800 even though he was willing to pay a thousand.

Are you free tonight? Because I feel like next time my boyfriend and I decide who gets to pick what movie to watch, I would like you to be part of the decision.

There’s a solution for this, too – fair random assignment, or coin flipping – for when you’re dealing with something that can’t be divided like what movie to watch. If you have more than two people, you can use a similar protocol, but it has a way cooler name.

DASKALAKIS: This has the eerie name of random dictatorship. Say you want to – say you have a group of five friends and you want to decide what to do tonight. OK. One way to be fair about the decision is to say, I’m going to flip a five-faced dice. OK.

HERSHIPS: Yeah.

DASKALAKIS: And, you know, whoever is elected will decide the whole plan.

HERSHIPS: Costis says there are other solutions – auctions, lotteries, time sharing. But, of course, if you want something badly enough and you can afford it, you can always buy yourself a cake and eat it too. Sally Herships, NPR News.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Lights Out For PG&E?

The Pacific Gas

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Utilities in the U.S. are generally private companies regulated by government commissions. With a dedicated customer base – everyone needs water and power, right? – and government protection and oversight, utilities seemed like a safe bet for most investors.

So many people were shocked this week, when California’s largest public utility, Pacific Gas and Electric Company — or PG&E — filed for bankruptcy. Perhaps people shouldn’t have been so surprised: it’s not the first time PG&E has sought protection from its creditors, after all. The utility filed under Chapter 11 in 2001 in the wake of a power meltdown in California.

But this is the largest bankruptcy filing since the financial crisis, and the largest bankruptcy filing of a utility ever. PG&E says it was forced to take this step because of the damages it may have to pay after wildfires devastated parts of California, wildfires that some people claim were caused by the utility.

Today on The Indicator, how PG&E’s woes show how the utility business is changing.

Music by Drop Electric. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Federal Judge Blasts PG&E's Commitment To California Wildfire Safety

A federal judge in California blasted utility giant Pacific Gas and Electric Co. on Wednesday, accusing the beleaguered company of putting profits before customer safety and not doing enough to keep trees away from its power lines, thus increasing the risk of wildfires.

“Safety is not your number one thing,” said U.S. District Judge William Alsup said in a probation hearing in San Francisco. The hearing came one day after the utility had filed for bankruptcy protection in the face of billions of dollars in potential liabilities stemming from two seasons of devastating wildfires.

Alsup is scrutinizing the utility company’s criminal convictions for violating pipeline safety laws after the massive 2010 gas explosion that killed eight people and incinerated a neighborhood in San Bruno, Calif., just south of San Francisco.

An investigation is underway to determine what role PG&E’s power lines may have played in igniting last year’s deadly Camp Fire that killed at least 86 people and destroyed much of the Northern California town of Paradise.

“To my mind, there’s a very clear-cut pattern here: that PG&E is starting these fires,” Alsup said. “What do we do? Does the judge just turn a blind eye and say, ‘PG&E continue your business as usual. Kill more people by starting more fires.’ “

The judge was not done. He said he is concerned about the possibility of more wildfires in 2019.

“Will we be seeing headlines: ‘PG&E has done it again?'” asked Alsup. “Started another fire and some other town burned down because you didn’t turn the power off or you didn’t cut the trees?”

However, the judge did not order the company to comply immediately with a series of proposals he made requiring it to inspect its entire power grid and “remove or trim all tress that could fall onto its power lines.” Alsup also suggested that PG&E temporarily shut off power in some circumstances to avoid igniting fires. The company responded saying the judge’s safety plan was not feasible and could cost as much as $150 billion.

The judge said he wants to see a wildfire mitigation plan the company is expected to send to state regulators next month.

In Wednesday’s hearing, PG&E attorney Kevin Orsini said the company is taking steps to reduce the wildfire danger, but that it would not be able to find enough qualified tree trimmers to do all the work the judge has proposed.

“The people don’t exist,” said Orsini.

In a statement issued after the hearing, the company said it “shares the court’s commitment to safety and agrees with the urgency that we all have to work together to reduce the risk of wildfire throughout Northern and Central California.”

“We look forward to working with the court and probation on how we might enhance our communication efforts,” it added.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Bond Is Born

A gondola sails in a Venice canal in September.

Filippo Monteforte/AFP/Getty Images

Venice was a financial powerhouse in the twelfth century, but when the Byzantine Empire started imprisoning Venetian merchants, Venice had to strike back. To do that, it needed to raise money. Venetian politicians started a new kind of loan, the “prestiti,” so they could borrow money for war. Today on The Indicator, how the the first bond came to be and how it transformed the way governments borrow money.

Music “Morning Start”, “Offertorium: Ecce apertum est Templum tabernaculi”

Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Globalization At Davos: What Happened?

Gregory Warner’s radio studio at Davos, Switzerland during the World Economic Forum last week.

Gregory Warner


hide caption

toggle caption

Gregory Warner

The World Economic Forum sounds like it should be a gathering of nerdy people in discounted suits in a mid-range hotel in an off-season resort, all standing around drinking Two-Buck Chuck and discussing wonky things like cost-benefit analysis and market-driven incentives.

In fact, it’s exactly the reverse. The WEF in Davos has become an annual event where the rich and famous descend on one of the most expensive winter resorts in the world, in the middle of the ski season. Heads of state rub shoulders with movie stars, sip on expensive champagne, and eat fancy hors d’oeuvres and pontificate in front of the paparazzi about their pet global issues of the day.

Or that’s what it can seem like to outsiders. But it’s that what really happens at Davos? We asked NPRs Gregory Warner, who’s been hanging out there this last week.

Music by Drop Electric. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Chinese, Taiwanese Restaurants Drop 'Golden' And 'Dragon' To Take On Mandarin Names

More Chinese and Taiwanese restaurants in the U.S. are embracing Mandarin to name their businesses.



MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Restaurants serving Chinese or Taiwanese food in the U.S. often use the same few words in their names. Think golden and dragon. But NPR’s Hansi Lo Wang has been noticing a different trend in New York City.

HANSI LO WANG, BYLINE: Down underground in a Manhattan subway station, a wok full of napa cabbage and carrots are stir-frying in Edward Huang’s first restaurant. Slow-braised beef noodle soup and rice bowls topped with minced five-spice pork are all served from this galley kitchen crammed inside a bustling food court. Huang says the dishes were inspired by visits to his family in Taiwan, and so was the restaurant’s name – Zai Lai.

EDWARD HUANG: My family’s parting words are always zai lai – come back soon, literally. But it’s, like, a see you soon, come back soon sort of idea.

H. WANG: At first, though, spelling out that Mandarin phrase in English letters – Z-A-I L-A-I – was not what Huang had in mind for branding his Taiwanese restaurant.

HUANG: People come, and they say, oh, is it Zay Lay (ph)? We had – you know, some of our employees in the beginning had trouble pronouncing it. And I wanted to avoid that headache.

HONGYUAN DONG: Well, I guess the only difficult sound here is the Z.

H. WANG: Hongyuan Dong teaches Chinese at the George Washington University in D.C. Here’s how he coaches his students on pronouncing that Z sound in Mandarin.

DONG: So it’s similar to Ds in English. So it’s not zai (ph) – it’s dsai (ph).

H. WANG: Dong says he’s seen other new restaurants with Mandarin names written in pinyin. It’s a system of transliterating Chinese characters using the Roman alphabet. Pinyin was first adopted by the Chinese Communist Party, and now it’s an international standard that’s popping up even on restaurant signs in Washington, D.C.

DONG: Actually, I noticed a new restaurant called Lao Ban. There’s no English because lao ban (ph) means the boss in Chinese.

H. WANG: That’s another sign, Dong says, of how much more common Mandarin is in U.S. culture today.

HEATHER LEE: I think it means that we’re ready to engage mainland China. We’re speaking in the language of mainland China.

H. WANG: Heather Lee is a historian at New York University Shanghai. She’s researched the history of Chinese restaurants in the U.S., including when names in Cantonese rather than Mandarin were often spelled out using English letters. Over the years, many other restaurants have adopted some common keywords in their English names like panda and Great Wall. Lee says the transition towards Mandarin names marks a shift in who’s running the restaurants and the kinds of customers they’re trying to attract.

LEE: They’re linking up with a wealthier professional population from mainland China. A lot of them seem to have connections to Taiwan as well.

H. WANG: For Jason Wang, it was a connection to the city of Xi’an in northwest China that he wanted to preserve right in the name of his family’s restaurant chain in New York – Xi’an Famous Foods. The first part of the name is spelled with an X-I. It’s one of the hardest sounds to pronounce for many non-Mandarin speakers. And Wang says putting that X on his restaurant storefronts has helped the business grow.

JASON WANG: Let’s just keep things authentic. You know, let’s keep the X. Let’s keep the spice in the food. Let’s not make it too easy for people. People like discovering stuff, you know. They don’t really like everything handed to them on a platter.

H. WANG: Wang adds it’s also a matter of taking pride in his Chinese heritage.

J. WANG: Why are we ashamed of the stuff that we call our food or what we call our restaurants? I think that is also why we’ve become more confident in presenting the actual names versus trying to hide it behind some sort of euphemism of a name.

H. WANG: Back underground in the subway station at Zai Lai, Patrick Dixon (ph) is waiting for his order – a steamed pork bun.

PATRICK DIXON: You know, if I wanted, like, authentic Chinese cuisine, I’d consider the place that actually has, like, Chinese words in it before a place that has, like, just panda, you know?

H. WANG: Dixon’s a frequent customer at this restaurant. He says part of the draw is its name – Zai Lai.

You know what it means?

DIXON: No. I have no clue. What does it mean?

H. WANG: It means come again in Mandarin.

DIXON: Oh, that makes sense.

H. WANG: Especially since he’s planning to Zai Lai again and again.

Hansi Lo Wang, NPR News, New York.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Journalists Raise Money, Post Jobs And Buy Beers For Peers After A Week Of Layoffs

Members of the BuzzFeed News team work at their desks at BuzzFeed headquarters on Dec. 11, 2018.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

It’s been a tough week in the journalism industry.

On Wednesday, BuzzFeed announced plans to lay off 15 percent of its overall workforce. The layoffs are expected to affect around 200 employees — many in the company’s news division.

The same day, The Wall Street Journal reported that Verizon’s media group — which includes AOL, Yahoo and HuffPost — will lay off 7 percent of its staff. The layoffs include the entire HuffPost opinion and health sections.

Also on Wednesday, the newspaper giant Gannett started slashing jobs. For Gannett, the company behind USA Today and prominent local newspapers like The Indianapolis Star and The Arizona Republic, this week’s layoffs are part of years of downsizing and cuts for the company.

Many laid off journalists quickly took to Twitter to announce the loss of their jobs.

“Like so many talented and lovely journalists, I was laid off today,” tweeted HuffPost deputy opinion editor Chloe Angyal.

“I’m in shock. Not how I wanted 35 year journalism career to end,” tweeted longtime Indianapolis Star columnist Tim Swarens.

“If you’re hiring, my DMs are open,” tweeted BuzzFeed News investigative reporter Chris McDaniel.

For those who are wondering, @HuffPost Opinion — the entire section — is being eliminated. The beautiful, diverse, inclusive baby we built from scratch is gone.

— Chloe Angyal (@ChloeAngyal) January 24, 2019

I was told a few minutes ago that @indystar has laid me off. I’m in shock. Not how I wanted 35 year journalism career to end.

— Tim Swarens (@tswarens) January 23, 2019

Hey guys, I’m one of the many reporters laid off from BuzzFeed News today. I’m proud of the work I’ve done here, alongside some of the best investigative reporters there are. If you’re hiring, my DMs are open.

— Chris McDaniel (@csmcdaniel) January 25, 2019

On and on it continued.

But amid the Twitter storm of bad news, some supportive tweets emerged.

Following the lead of journalists in Chicago who started a beer fund for laid off colleagues in 2017, BuzzFeed News copy editor Emerson Malone decided to do the same for his own colleagues.

On Friday he tweeted, “A lot of my BuzzFeed News colleagues — and friends — are losing their jobs today. Please buy them a beer.”

Malone started a plumfund page to raise money, which brought in more than $7,800 in a 24-hour time span from hundreds of donors.

“I didn’t anticipate it,” he said. “The support system is so affirming.”

Some BuzzFeed staff in Los Angeles went out for drinks on Friday, but Malone said they plan to use the beer fund money when the group goes out again on Monday, which is many people’s last day.

BuzzFeed LA drowning our tears in beers on a sad lay-off day. ? ? pic.twitter.com/eY0XRmfeoV

— Ken Bensinger (@kenbensinger) January 25, 2019

Since BuzzFeed is an international organization, Malone said he also plans to spread the wealth evenly with laid-off BuzzFeed journalists in other locations. He said the layoffs affected a wide swath of people in his company.

“You could start a new newsroom on Monday with the amount of talent being lost,” he said.

In Washington, D.C., the National Press Club announced that it would offer free drinks and tacos for journalists who lost their jobs on Friday night.

Executive Director of the National Press Club, Bill McCarren, said the intention was to give journalists not only a little relief, but also an opportunity to network and stay optimistic.

“Just because you’re laid off someplace doesn’t mean you can’t get something somewhere else,” he said.

Cheers to new friend @LaurenWeberHP – recently laid off from @HuffPost who came for tacos! Current and potential NPC members – the Club is a great resource for networking and job searching…and a way to get out of the house! Join! #supportjournalists pic.twitter.com/YhSMRIm2j8

— National Press Club (@PressClubDC) January 26, 2019

When looking for their next job, recently laid off journalists might have a little help from supporters. Hundreds started posting on Twitter, creating job posting threads and using #journalismjobs to advertise open positions.

Others took it a step further. Chelsea Cirruzzo, a reporter at Inside Health Policy, decided to create a spreadsheet of jobs that people could add to.

She remembered how it felt when she was looking for a job a few months ago.

“It felt really draining to put in applications again and again and not hear back,” she said.

What helped her keep track of all her applications were spreadsheets. She hopes her spreadsheet can similarly help other journalists. BuzzFeed Senior Manager Kaye Toal also started a spreadsheet of her own, which included both journalism and other media industry jobs.

Many of those offering support for laid off journalists were journalists themselves. McCaren said he isn’t surprised by this, and spoke to a sense of solidarity within the struggling industry.

“A lot of people who are working have been through something like this at some time in their career,” he said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)