Business

No Image

Ethane And The Plastics Boom

America’s natural gas boom has also made it the world’s biggest exporter of ethane. It’s a building block for plastics, and U.S. gas is helping fuel the global plastics industry.



STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

A boom in one industry is fueling another. For years now, the United States has been the world’s largest producer of oil and gas. That has kept natural gas prices low. And to tell you what other industry that helps, I have one word – one word – plastics. Here’s Reid Frazier of StateImpact Pennsylvania and the public radio program The Allegheny Front.

REID FRAZIER, BYLINE: Natural gas is mostly used for heating homes or fueling power plants. But it has another key ingredient you may not have heard of – ethane, a building block of plastics. President Trump brought attention to it a few months ago when he visited the site of a chemical plant Shell is building in Pennsylvania.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED PEOPLE: (Chanting) U.S.A, U.S.A, U.S.A.

FRAZIER: This plant, like a number of others being built in the U.S., will convert some of the region’s ethane into plastic. Trump told workers this was bringing the country big economic benefits.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: American manufacturing. And we are reclaiming our noble heritage as a nation of builders again.

(APPLAUSE)

TRUMP: Nation of builders.

FRAZIER: But there’s so much natural gas and ethane that chemical plants in the U.S. can’t use it all. Turns out, this has been a lucky break for the European chemical company Ineos. In 2011, its own supplies of ethane from the North Sea were running low, says Warren Wilczewski, an economist with the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

WARREN WILCZEWSKI: Ineos looked at the United States where ethane supply was growing and where – especially in the Appalachian region, that ethane had, like, no place to go. And they recognized an opportunity.

FRAZIER: Ineos commissioned a fleet of ships, the first ever to carry ethane by sea, to move shale gas from a port near Philadelphia to plants in the U.K. and Norway. Ineos officials did not agree to an interview for this story, but here’s CEO Jim Ratcliffe in a company video.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JIM RATCLIFFE: I think for some of these assets in Europe, it’s the only way they can survive. If we can bring some of the U.S. economics across to Europe…

FRAZIER: The U.S. has quickly become the world’s leading exporter of ethane, feeding growing plastics industries in India and China. And those exports are expected to keep growing. Back in 2016, it was big news when U.S. methane arrived in Scotland.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED BBC REPORTER: It is the first delivery for Ineos of shale gas into the U.K. It’s arriving at Grangemouth later this morning.

FRAZIER: And Grangemouth is home to Scotland’s biggest petrochemical plant and refinery.

KEVIN ROSS: You can see some of the flares down there, operating some of the silo towers across there, and some of the many cooling towers that are actually onsite.

FRAZIER: Kevin Ross is president of the Scottish Plastics and Rubber Association and runs a local plastics testing company. He says American shale gas has allowed Ineos to restart one of its production units. The plant is now running at full capacity. That’s not just good for the 1,300 people who work there, but for the suppliers and contractors, like him.

(SOUNDBITE OF PLASTICS LAB MACHINES WHIRRING)

ROSS: Watch your feet.

FRAZIER: At the nearby lab where his company tests plastic materials, he shows me what looks like a glossy plastic pipe.

ROSS: Almost certainly, because of what it’s made of, it’s either nuclear, pharmaceutical or military – almost certainly – because it is so expensive.

FRAZIER: So it’s a pipe?

ROSS: It is a pipe on steroids. It is a very high-performance pipe.

FRAZIER: Ineos got hundreds of millions of dollars in loan guarantees from the U.K. to retrofit the Grangemouth plant for American shale gas. But it’s also pushed for its own local supply. It wants the U.K. to allow fracking, the controversial technology that breaks up rock deep underground to get oil and natural gas. And that plan was met with intense opposition. Norman Philip, with Friends of the Earth Scotland, opposed fracking because of what he’d heard about it from communities in the U.S. and Australia.

NORMAN PHILIP: People were telling us of gas leaks. They were telling us of, like, children having headaches, and there was a toxic element of it.

FRAZIER: The pushback has resulted in an ironic twist to this story. In 2015, Scotland put in place a moratorium on fracking, and the U.K. government recently did the same. So fracking is illegal in Britain, even though it’s still legal to import shale gas produced by fracking in the U.S. Lee Sinclair is a railroad engineer at the Grangemouth petrochemical plant. He has mixed feelings about this.

LEE SINCLAIR: I think it’s a good idea, just the fact that we’re getting gas from somewhere. And the only thing I don’t like about it is Scotland said, no, well, you’re not fracking here. So they decide to go to America to get his gas.

FRAZIER: He’d rather the U.K. get a local supply. But for now, he says, America’s boom in gas and ethane is helping him keep his job. For NPR News, I’m Reid Frazier in Grangemouth, Scotland.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

How Some Online Lenders Dodge State Laws To Charge Triple Digit Interest Rates

Online lenders charging triple digit interest rates are dodging state laws banning such loans. The money is routed through banks that aren’t regulated at the state level to get around the rules.



AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Consumer watchdogs say online lenders are dodging state laws that ban very high interest rate loans, some in excess of 100%. The lenders say they’re not doing anything wrong, but advocates say these loans are predatory and are asking federal regulators to crack down. NPR’s Chris Arnold reports.

CHRIS ARNOLD, BYLINE: OK, so let’s say that I’m an online lender charging 100% interest rates. Things are working pretty well for me here. I’m making money. But then the state of California passes a new law capping interest rates for many loans much lower – at around 38%. What do I do? Well, if I can find a partner – a real bank, one that’s not subject to the state of California’s rate cap – the loan money flows through that bank – and boom – I can get around the rate cap.

LAUREN SAUNDERS: Right. I mean, this is almost like money laundering, right? This is laundering, you know, basically the source of the money and the source of the loans.

ARNOLD: That’s Lauren Saunders, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. She says a lot of these online lenders are using what she calls rent-a-bank schemes. This lets them skirt state law because there’s no federal cap on interest rates, and most banks are not subject to the state rate caps. Saunders says this can work in different ways, but the simple version is this. The online lender does basically all the work to find the customers, approve the loans, collect on them, but right when someone gets a loan…

SAUNDERS: At the moment that the money actually goes to the consumer…

ARNOLD: That money comes from a bank that’s not covered by the interest rate limitations. So she says the online lender then immediately buys the loan back from the bank.

SAUNDERS: So it’s not really a bank loan. They’re just using banks as a fig leaf to make really high-cost loans – 160% interest – in states where those loans are illegal.

ARNOLD: Saunders says a lot more people are taking out online loans these days, and lenders are evading rate caps in 25 states. So she and 60 other consumer protection and civil rights groups have now sent letters to federal regulators, asking them to crack down. It seems clear that online lenders are evading state rate caps. On an earnings call before the California law passed, the company Elevate Credit Inc. talked about it openly. The interim CEO Jason Harvison talked about working with banks to get around rate caps.

JASON HARVISON: Similar to our recent experience in Ohio, we expect to be able to continue to serve California consumers via our bank sponsors that are not subject to the same proposed state level rate limitations.

ARNOLD: The online lenders, though, maintain that they’re not doing anything wrong. Elevate tells NPR in a statement that the letters from consumer groups, quote, “grossly mischaracterized our business and intent,” and that the company says its relationship with outside banks is in full compliance with all federal laws. So is dodging state interest rate rules illegal or just unseemly or just a creative way to keep serving your customers?

ADAM LEVITIN: We have a system right now that makes no sense.

ARNOLD: Adam Levitin is a law professor at Georgetown University. He says lawsuits in the works will likely help determine where the legal line is here. And he says Elevate, for example, does more sophisticated partnerships, which might be more legally defensible. So instead of the simple rent-a-bank scheme, in Elevate’s case – you might want to hang on to your brain here.

LEVITIN: The bank keeps the loan but sells a derivative interest in the loan – a 90% derivative interest – to a entity associated with Elevate.

ARNOLD: If that’s confusing, don’t worry. Levitin says the point is this whole complicated structure is being set up to get around the state rate cap. And he says the underlying problem is that some lenders have to play by one set of regulations, and banks get to play by another set of rules.

LEVITIN: The better way to do this really would be to have a national usury law.

ARNOLD: In other words, a nationwide rule that all lenders would have to follow. And today in Congress, lawmakers introduced a bipartisan bill to establish a national interest rate cap of 36%. Active duty military already have that protection. Some lawmakers want to extend it to the rest of the country. But plenty of financial firms are likely to lobby against it.

Chris Arnold, NPR News.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Brexit Among Reasons For Rising Real Estate Prices In France

Paris is becoming unaffordable as prices are pushed up partly by Brexit, as wealthy people and companies relocate from London.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Paris has become one of the most expensive housing markets in Europe. One reason for the rising costs is Brexit, the U.K.’s long effort to leave the European Union. NPR’s Eleanor Beardsley looks at the factors driving the market.

ELEANOR BEARDSLEY, BYLINE: The Gutierrez family has just moved into their spacious four-bedroom apartment in the center of Paris, part of a wave of expats who have crossed the channel from London. Pilar Gutierrez, a Spanish national, is employed by the European Banking Authority. She remembers the shock of Britain’s referendum on whether to leave or remain in the European Union.

PILAR GUTIERREZ: I remember on the 25th of June when we went to bed, it was like – still remain winning. But when we woke up on the 24th, it was the other way around, so it was a big shock for us. It was a big shock. Since the 24th of June 2016, we knew that we would have to move.

BEARDSLEY: Aside from EU organizations, international banks and businesses have also left London and relocated to continental cities like Paris, Amsterdam and Frankfurt in order to stay inside the EU. Gutierrez says it’s not easy to move big organizations. It’s been hard enough to move her own family.

GUTIERREZ: It’s always challenging when you move to a new country, a new city and even more if you cannot to speak the language, right?

BEARDSLEY: But France is putting out the welcome mat. The French government has cut red tape and wealth taxes, and several new international schools are opening in Paris.

MARIE-HELEN LUNDGREN: (Speaking French).

BEARDSLEY: High-end realtor Marie-Helen Lundgren says buyers have always chosen Paris for its beauty, cuisine and culture. But now it’s also an economic choice. She says in 22 years, she’s never seen such a booming market.

LUNDGREN: Oh, no. We have not enough properties. We are in the scarcity market. We sell about three, four properties a day.

BEARDSLEY: According to newspaper Le Parisien, the price of real estate in the French capital has risen 248% in the last two decades. Lundgren says Brexit is not the only reason people are flocking to Paris. She also credits low interest rates and the pro-business policies of President Emmanuel Macron.

LUNDGREN: We saw that many expats – French expats and also international clients came back to Paris and wanted to invest in Paris.

BEARDSLEY: The rise in apartment prices is also pushing some middle-class families out of the city. To stop the exodus, the Paris mayor has introduced new regulations to keep rents affordable. But Thierry Delesalle, head of Paris’ Chamber of Notaries, says that won’t stop the rise in property prices because people aren’t buying apartments to rent them out.

THIERRY DELESALLE: (Through interpreter) Even at these high prices, people are buying to live in Paris. Ninety percent of buyers are buying to live in their new properties.

BEARDSLEY: Delesalle says the Paris housing market is not a bubble waiting to burst. Paris real estate, he says, is a solid, long-term investment.

Eleanor Beardsley, NPR News, Paris.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

#MeToo Hits High-End Wine Industry

NPR’s Michel Martin talks with Bon Appetit wine editor Marissa Ross about sexual harassment in the high-end wine industry.



MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

In recent years, the phrase #MeToo has become a hashtag and a movement that’s helped survivors of sexual violence feel more connected and less alone. That movement has also forced many industries to reckon with patterns of sexual misbehavior that were ignored or tolerated for years.

A similar conversation is now taking place in the wine industry, which is dominated by mostly male winemakers and influential sommeliers. Last week, The New York Times wrote about a rising star in that world, a sommelier who was accused by four women of assaulting them or trying to do so. That sommelier has since resigned. But we wanted to hear more about the environment for women and wine, so we’ve called Marissa Ross, who’s a columnist and wine editor for Bon Appetit. Marissa Ross is with us now.

Welcome. Thank you so much for joining us.

MARISSA ROSS: Thank you for having me, Michel.

MARTIN: When you first got into the industry, did it seem like a very male space to you? I mean, I know that sometimes, you know, people walk into certain rooms, and they look around and go, gee, this is a pretty male environment. Did it feel that way to you when you got into the business?

ROSS: Absolutely. Even before I got into the business, I was going to a lot of tastings to learn about wine. And I remember there was always so many men there. And this one man in particular – like, I’ll never forget this. I do curse from time to time. I’m a human (laughter). And I remember this man that was next to me that I hadn’t even been talking to turning to me and being, like, ladies can’t talk that way. And if you can’t be a lady, you shouldn’t be in here. You know, it just felt, like, woah – like, I can’t be in this space and be myself.

And I was one of the only women in there at the time. And then, once I became a part of the business, it became very clear to me very quickly that I was always going to be one of the few women in the room. Luckily, things have changed over the last five years, but there’s still a lot more room to grow and change.

MARTIN: And in terms of the behavior that has been exposed, has been written about, have you experienced that as well? Because, as I mentioned, The New York Times published an article by Julia Moskin which detailed allegations against a particular person. But it also talked about people feeling like they can touch you, groping…

ROSS: Oh, absolutely.

MARTIN: …And worse. I mean, is that something that you and other women in the industry have experienced?

ROSS: That is something that I experience on a regular basis. I was at a wine-tasting festival just this past spring, and a winemaker came up to me and, like, grabbed me from behind and grabbed my breasts and, like, whispered in my ear that, like, one day he’d have me and then, like, kissed my neck. And I’m, like, what are you doing? And those behaviors get excused because, oh, they’re French. You just don’t understand their culture. You know, I do my best to try to leave events early, and I monitor how much I drink.

And, you know, there’s so much that women have to do to protect themselves in these environments, and that’s why it’s really scary for younger women that are entering this industry – because they possibly don’t have those skills yet. They don’t have that knowledge of, like, oh, I have to be consciously aware of how much I’m consuming, how much everyone around me is consuming, what everyone around me is doing, and where am I, like, fitting into all that? And it’s a lot of mental work.

MARTIN: And I say that because you also wrote a piece about this for Bon Appetit, and the title of which is, “To Make The Wine Industry Less Toxic, We Need To Get Loud.” And one of the things that you point out in your piece is that drinking is part of the job. You know, in a lot of workplaces, you know, right before a holiday party, for example, the company will issue guidelines saying…

ROSS: Yeah.

MARTIN: …Watch how much you drink, and, you know, don’t drink if you have to drive and things like that, and – but drinking is, in fact, part of your job. And I wanted to ask – when you are at these events, is there any effort made to watch the behavior of people, to – are there any steps taken to ensure people’s safety? Is there anything like that?

ROSS: I don’t think that there really has been yet. There really isn’t even any, like, self-policing. But now, we’re going to have to do something about it. If we can’t rely on people to take it upon themselves to act appropriately, then I believe that it is the leaders in our community’s job to start making sure that they do. And I don’t think – a lot of it too is it’s, like, well, that’s not very fun to make rules. Well, you know what’s not really fun? When you don’t feel safe in a space. And something has to change.

MARTIN: So how – what has been – the reaction been? I understand that you actually – you helped gather some of the accusations about this particular sommelier who, as we said, has since resigned, that were published in The New York Times piece. And I know that you wrote about the fact that people have been sharing stories with you. I mean, this has all happened within the last week. What reaction have you been seeing to the fact that something that apparently you all have been talking about privately has now become public?

ROSS: The response has been actually really quite wonderful in terms of the way that the community has come together to spread the word and to get people to come to me. I’m still having survivors that are coming to me, which is incredible. And people are – have been overall very supportive. Of course, there are the same sort of detractors that all stories like this get, where they blame it on a generational thing or, you know, whatever. But it’s not a generational thing, I don’t personally believe. I think it’s a systemic problem.

And overall, I’m very, very, very happy that it’s resonating with so many people and that they can see that if it’s happening in this industry, it’s all industries. It’s all walks of life where this is happening, and we have to keep talking about it in order to make sure that it stops happening in all of our lives.

MARTIN: That is Marissa Ross, wine editor for Bon Appetit magazine. You can read her piece “To Make The Wine Industry Less Toxic, We Need To Get Loud” at the Bon Appetit site.

Marissa Ross, thanks so much for talking to us.

ROSS: Thank you so much, Michel.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Smart Home Neighborhood: Residents Find It Enjoyably Convenient Or A Bit Creepy

Lennar New Home Consultant Brittney Svach is selling “smart homes” at the Amazon Experience Center in Black Diamond, Washington, about an hour south of Seattle.

Joshua McNichols/Joshua McNichols


hide caption

toggle caption

Joshua McNichols/Joshua McNichols

When the Ferguson family decided they wanted to live in the Seattle suburb of Black Diamond they weren’t in the market for a smart home. But they wound up with one, a house packed with Internet-connected devices.

Fifteen-year-old Macey Ferguson loves it. “I just feel really fancy,” she says about having Amazon’s Alexa there to turn on the lights for her, or to remind her when to go to cheerleading practice. “I feel like she’s my little servant, or butler.” Her older brother uses it for math homework, her younger sister for calling grandma. Her three-year-old brother asks Alexa for cake recipes so he can stare longingly at the photos.

Kelli Ferguson, the mom in this household, is more ambivalent. On the one hand, it’s nice to ask Alexa to heat up the house before crawling out of bed in the winter. On the other, there’s all those cameras. “If I’m walking on our street, I walk on the other side of the street,” she said, meaning the side without the smart homes. “Just because I don’t feel like being on everyone’s cameras.”

Living in a smart home neighborhood, the Fergusons experience both convenience and surveillance. And that’s typical in Black Diamond, where Lennar Homes offers smart homes as part of a 4,800 unit development that includes other builders. This neighborhood isn’t a one off. There are smart home developments in suburbs outside of cities such as Miami and San Francisco. Lennar is making Amazon tech standard on each of the 45,000 homes it builds this year.

This partnership between builders and Amazon benefits both sides. Amazon wants to push for wider adoption of its Echo smart speaker. Lennar relies on Amazon to help distinguish it from other home builders in communities like Black Diamond.

But do users really need smart home technology?

Amazon really wants you to think so. In Black Diamond, the pitch starts at the Amazon Experience Center, a model home just around the corner from the Fergusons.

Lennar New Home consultant Brittney Svach throws out commands like a smart home samurai, using her voice to lock the door, start up the robot vacuum, dim the lights, close the blinds, and call up a feed on the smart television from one of the home’s many surveillance cameras. “Alexa, show me the backyard,” she commands. Up pops a video. “And now we can spy on whoever’s having a drink out on the patio,” she says with a smile.

Amazon has a lot of ground to cover if it wants to build a market of consumers hungry for smart homes. A Zillow survey says smart homes technology is down the list of desired home features, lagging far behind air conditioning and ample storage. It’s roughly as important as a hot tub for those shopping for a home.

But Dave Garland thinks the technology will take off once people try it. He’s with Second Century Ventures, an investment arm of the National Association of Realtors. “There’s a new narrative when it comes to what ‘home’ means,” he says. “It means a personalized environment where technology responds to your every need. “

Black Diamond resident Drew Holmes buys that line. Like the Fergusons, he wasn’t looking for a smart home, but the technology came with the one he happened to like. Now he enjoys all the smart home features. “I would not live without them,” he said.

His favorite is a Ring doorbell that logs visitors. “I have teenagers,” he said. “It’s nice to confirm when they come home. And I have proof of it.”

Therron Smith had a very different reaction to the smart home pitch. “The thought of having cameras in every room and that potential exposure… just kind of made us nervous about it,” he says.

Smith works in tech, and says that’s how he knows the risks. It’s not just cameras, even light switches capture information. “That data’s not just sitting there, just… empty,” he says. “Somebody’s gonna look at it and leverage it, to try to turn a profit, or try to create an ad, or try to create some revenue.”

When newcomers purchase a home in Black Diamond, they’re not just buying property – they’re staking out a position on how far they’ll allow tech companies to intrude into their lives. That’s something many us will need to navigate if this technology becomes standard in more neighborhoods.

You can learn more on how Amazon is changing us by subscribing to the KUOW podcast, “Primed.”

Editor’s note: Amazon is one of NPR’s recent financial supporters.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

With Blackouts, California’s Electric Car Owners Are Finding New Ways To Charge Up

Clarence Dold used his 2013 Nissan Leaf to power his house during a four-day blackout in Santa Rosa, Calif., as a result of the Kincade Fire.

NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

NPR

Lawrence Levee’s evacuation call came at 4 a.m. The Getty fire was just a few miles away. He and all of his Mandeville Canyon neighbors needed to evacuate.

He grabbed what he could and threw it into his bright blue electric Chevy Bolt. His car battery was only charged halfway, but that left him with plenty of power to make a quick getaway and then some.

But after driving around the next day, running errands in an area he didn’t know well, he was in a pickle. He couldn’t find a charging station. And he had 25 miles left to his tank.

“Where are the cheap charging stations?” Levy asked a Facebook group for Bolt owners, where members have been talking about how to charge up in a disaster situation.

Levee is one of hundreds of thousands of electric car drivers in California, many of whom are caught in a state-wide struggle for electric power. As flames rip through rural and urban areas, utilities are cutting about a million customers off the grid. The blackouts sometimes last for days at a time, forcing some electric car owners to find alternative ways to charge up.

It’s an ironic conundrum in a state that’s home to more electric cars than any other other. California has just under half of the electric cars in sold in the U.S., according to EV Volumes, a group that tracks electric car sales.

In Levee’s case, he didn’t expect to be away from his house for so long. Normally, he’d pull into his garage and connect to a solar-powered battery. But that was impossible. Instead, he tried to hit up a nearby public charger that he remembered driving past a couple of times. But when he got there, it was broken.

Dreaded “range anxiety” set in. If he didn’t plug in soon, he could end up stranded.

But his trusty Bolt Facebook group came to the rescue. That’s where electric car fans commiserate, offer advice and do the occasional gas-car-driver bashing. Lately, they’ve been talking about blackouts. They pointed him to an app, and he found a free charger at a mall a few miles away.

Levee has only owned his Bolt for eight months, and already he says he’ll “never go back to a regular car.” Despite the brief inconvenience and the fire evacuations that are in his future, he notes California has better electric car infrastructure than any other state, with 18,000 public charging stations, according to the California Energy Commission.

And some electric car owners are taking advantage of these charging stations in new ways.

Clarence Dold lives in Sonoma County, which had been ravaged by the Kincade fire. Dold owns a 2013 Nissan Leaf and was left without power for four days.

But Dold found an ingenious use for his car: as a generator to power his house.

All it took was a pair of jumper cables that he connected to the Leaf’s battery and an inverter about the size of a dictionary. The inverter box changes direct current (DC) power, the kind that powers electric cars, into alternating current (AC), the electrical current that powers homes.

After that, he ran a series of heavy duty extension cords into the main rooms of his ranch house. Throughout the blackout, Dold said, “were watching TV, and had a cold fridge and a couple of lights and things seemed normal.”

The whole thing cost about $200 — a fraction of the price of a generator, which can run thousands of dollars.

Every few hours, Dold said, he’d make his way back into the car to check the battery gauge. He wanted to make sure the house wasn’t depleting the car of too much power. If it did, he’d disconnect the cables and drive 5 miles away to recharge at a public charging station.

“The power outages are not over a broad area; this isn’t like a hurricane hitting Florida,” he explained.

During the blackout, the rest of the neighborhood was a cacophony of gas and electric generator rumblings. Meanwhile, his Nissan Leaf was virtually silent.

For Dold, and other enterprising electric car owners like him, that’s the secret sauce to surviving what’s becoming the new normal in California.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Feds Say Self-Driving Uber SUV Did Not Recognize Jaywalking Pedestrian In Fatal Crash

The self-driving Uber SUV that struck pedestrian Elaine Herzberg on March 18, 2018, in Tempe, Ariz.

Tempe Police Department via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Tempe Police Department via AP

The self-driving Uber SUV involved in a fatal crash that killed a Tempe, Ariz., woman last year did not recognize her as a jaywalking pedestrian and its braking system was not designed to avoid an imminent collision, according to a federal report released this week.

The conclusions by the National Transportation Safety Board were published ahead of a Nov. 19 meeting in Washington, D.C., called to discuss the cause of the crash and safety recommendations.

The self-driving vehicle struck and killed 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg on March 18, 2018, as she was walking across the street with her bicycle outside of a crosswalk.

According to the NTSB report, the SUV had “a fusion” of three sensor systems — radar, lidar and a camera — designed to detect an object and determine its trajectory. However, the system could not determine whether Herzberg was a pedestrian, vehicle, or bicycle. It also failed to correctly predict her path.

“The system design did not include a consideration for jaywalking pedestrians,” the report said.

At 1.2 seconds before the fatal crash, the system identified Herzberg as a bicycle moving into the path of the Uber, but by then it was too late to safely brake and avoid a collision.

The Uber SUV — a Volvo XC90 — was supervised by Rafaela Vasquez. The Tempe police had previously determined that Vasquez was watching an episode of The Voice while operating the test vehicle, according to The Arizona Republic.

Uber said that it regrets the crash that took Herzberg’s life and is committed to “further prioritize safety.”

“We deeply value the thoroughness of the NTSB’s investigation into the crash and look forward to reviewing their recommendations once issued after the NTSB’s board meeting later this month,” the company said in a statement.

The Tempe crash has amplified calls for regulating the testing of self-driving vehicles.

“We hope Uber has cleaned up its act, but without mandatory standards for self-driving cars, there will always be companies out there that skimp on safety,” Ethan Douglas, senior policy analyst for Consumer Reports, said in a statement as quoted by the Associated Press. “We need smart, strong safety rules in place for self-driving cars to reach their life-saving potential.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Boeing CEO Says He Decided Not To Quit After 737 Max Crashes And Gave Up Bonuses

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg testifies before a Senate committee last week on the 737 Max.

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

The CEO of Boeing says he considered stepping down in the aftermath of two 737 Max plane crashes in the last year that killed 346 people, but he says he is committed to staying on and seeing the giant defense and aerospace company through one of the worst crises of its century-long existence.

“I think it’s fair to say I’ve thought about it,” Boeing chief executive Dennis Muilenburg said Wednesday at a business conference. “But to be frank, that’s not what’s in my character. I don’t see running away from a challenge, resigning, as the right solution.”

Muilenburg’s comments come after he and his company faced criticism from lawmakers in two congressional hearings last week on Boeing’s role in the deadly plane crashes in Indonesia Oct. 29, 2018, and in Ethiopia on March 10 of this year. In his testimony, Muilenburg acknowledged Boeing made mistakes in the design and development of flight control system on the 737 Max that contributed to the crashes, and subsequent missteps in how the company responded to the crashes.

“They happened on my watch,” says Muilenburg of his reasons for staying put. “And I feel obligated, I feel responsible to stay on it, to work with the team to fix it, to see it through.”

Muilenburg says he is giving up his bonuses this year as the company struggles regain public confidence in the aftermath of the 737 Max crashes.

The CEO took home more than $23 million in salary and bonuses last year. But this year, Muilenburg says he’s asked Boeing’s board of directors to waive his bonuses.

Speaking Wednesday at the New York Times’ Dealbook conference, Muilenburg said he felt “a sense of responsibility … and conveying to our team, to all of our customers, to the families (of crash victims), that to me, it’s not about the money. It’s about the importance of what we do and our commitment to safety as a company.”

Muilenburg met with family members of some of those killed in the two crashes last Tuesday evening, in between the Senate and House committee hearings. He says he’s “heartbroken” by their stories of the losses they’ve suffered, adding, “I wish I had gone to visit them earlier,” he said.

In congressional hearings last week, some lawmakers ripped into Muilenburg for his high salary and multi-million dollars worth of stock options and bonuses, and for at that point, not offering to give up any of that lucrative compensation.

“What does accountability mean? Are you taking a cut in pay?” Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., angrily asked Muilenburg. “Are you working for free from now on till you can cure this problem?”

Pointing to the family members of some of those killed in the 737 Max plane crashes sitting in the gallery, Cohen continued to scold the CEO. “These people’s relatives are not coming back. They’re gone. And you won’t take a pay cut? Are you giving up any money?”

In an interview with CNBC Tuesday, Boeing Board Chairman David Calhoun said that exchange affected Muilenburg.

“Dennis was very uncomfortable in that situation,” Calhoun said of the exchange during the House Transportation Committee hearing. Calhoun says Muilenburg listened “to every story that the victims families presented to him, changed him for life. Now he’s got it in his core, and in his bones. It’s had a tremendous impact.”

Calhoun says the Board still has full confidence in Muilenburg. “From the vantage point of our board,” he said, “Dennis has done everything right.”

That comment doesn’t set well with some families of crash victims.

“His words are simply an insult to humanity,” says Paul Njoroge, whose wife, three small children and mother-in-law all were killed in the Ethiopian Airlines crash on March 10.

“How can he dare say that (Muilenburg) did ‘everything right’ while it’s so apparent that the company executives knew about” the flawed design of the flight control system that contributed both crashes. Njoroge adds, “Calhoun’s words were disrespectful to me, and to all the flying public.”

As for Muilenburg’s comments that he is “heartbroken” after meeting with some families, those words, too, ring hollow.

“He is exploiting and marketing the meeting with families for Boeing’s gain,” says Michael Stumo, whose 23-year old daughter Samya was killed in the Ethiopian crash.

Stumo says the claim Muilenburg spent “a few hours with the families” is “untrue. He spent a fraction of that time with just a few families with no effort to reach out to other families.”

Stumo went on to criticize Muilenburg for not explaining why the company “failed to fix the self-hijacking 737 MAX 8 after the Indonesian crash when they had clear knowledge of the problem. They hid it from pilots, failed to fix it … (and) as a result, my daughter died. Muilenburg must resign. He is not a leader, but an actor shielding his company from accountability.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

FCC Clears T-Mobile/Sprint Merger Deal

Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure (left) and T-Mobile CEO John Legere on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on April 30, 2018.

Richard Drew/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Richard Drew/AP

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday released its Oct. 16 order allowing T-Mobile to merge with Sprint in a $26.5 billion deal. The commissioners approved the deal last month on a closed-door, 3-2 party-line vote.

The merger was praised by Republican commissioners as a boon for rural America and by Democratic commissioners as a disaster for consumers. The merger still faces a legal challenge by a coalition of state attorneys general.

“The Commission found that the transaction will help close the digital divide and advance United States leadership in 5G, the next generation of wireless connectivity,” the FCC said in a statement. “Specifically, T-Mobile and Sprint have committed within three years to deploy 5G service to cover 97% of the American people, and within six years to reach 99% of all Americans. This commitment includes deploying 5G service to cover 85% of rural Americans within three years and 90% of rural Americans within six years.

Dissenting Democratic commissioners said the promises T-Mobile and Sprint made are not enforceable and that the merger will shrink the number of national providers from four to three, thereby reducing competition overall.

“In the short term, this merger will result in the loss of potentially thousands of jobs,” wrote Commissioner Geoffrey Starks. “In the long term, it will establish a market of three giant wireless carriers with every incentive to divide up the market, increase prices, and compete only for the most lucrative customers.”

In the states’ lawsuit, lead by New York and California, state attorneys general argue that the merger will reduce competition and lead to increased costs for consumers. Their suit goes to trial in December.

The T-Mobile and Sprint merger has been in the works since the Obama administration. But the Justice Department and FCC opposed the deal back in 2014. Regulators under the Trump administration have been more sympathetic.

Sprint is owned by the Japanese conglomerate Softbank and T-Mobile is owned by Germany’s Deutsche Telekom.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

California Seizes More Than $1.5 Billion In Illegal Marijuana

An illegal cannabis cultivation site in the City of Santa Maria, in San Luis Obispo County, Calif. Authorities seized 20 tons of illegal cannabis in a raid that lasted four days in June 2019.

AP


hide caption

toggle caption

AP

California authorities announced they seized more than $1.5 billion worth of illegal marijuana in fiscal year 2019, or the rough equivalent of the state’s legal market for cannabis.

More than 953,000 plants were seized from 345 raided grow sites around the state. Authorities arrested 148 people and confiscated 168 weapons under California’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting, or CAMP program.

“Illegal cannabis grows are devastating our communities. Criminals who disregard life, poison our waters, damage our public lands, and weaponize the illegal cannabis black market will be brought to justice,” said Attorney General Xavier Becerra in a statement on Monday.

The value of the seizures was based on the estimated wholesale price of $1,600 per plant.

A cannabis industry expert quoted by the Associated Press said that wholesale costs are doubled for the retail marijuana market, so the state seizures would be worth $3 billion of illegally grown marijuana.

California’s seizures are “equal to our entire regulated market, said Jerrod Kiloh, president of the United Cannabis Business Association.

Although cannabis has been legalized for use in California, there is still a large unlicensed black market,” said Robert Paoletti, Coordinator Colonel, California National Guard Counterdrug Task Force. “Our participation works to prevent this illegal market in order to promote a fair market place for those growers, producers, and vendors who choose to operate within the system that the voters approved.”

California voters legalized recreational marijuana in 2016. However the illegal market is still alive, in part, because consumers can avoid paying taxes on their cannabis.

Industry experts say the legal market is struggling to compete with the illegal market for other reasons.

“Regulators are ambivalent, publicly supporting the value of moving cannabis out of the illicit market and redressing the harms prohibition has done—such as overincarceration of minorities for minor possession offenses—but they have often proved unwilling to allow enough stores and keep regulatory and tax costs low enough to make the legal market competitive,” according to a report by industry analysts Arcview Market Researc and BDS Analytics.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)