Why Have 21 Horses Died At A California Racetrack Since December?

Santa Anita Park, shown here in 2012, has halted races and training to try to determine what is causing the horse deaths.
Frederic J. Brown /AFP/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Frederic J. Brown /AFP/Getty Images
Since the start of the racing season in late December, a shocking 21 horses have died at the famed Santa Anita Park racetrack in southern California.
It’s horrified the racing world and experts say there’s no clear answer as to why this is happening.
Santa Anita’s owners, The Stronach Group, announced on Tuesday that it was halting racing and training at the park in order to test the main track – a picturesque spot tucked next to the San Gabriel Mountains where the champion racehorse Seabiscuit won big.
“The safety, health and welfare of the horses and jockeys is our top priority,” Tim Ritvo, chief operating officer of the Stronach Group, said in a statement. “While we are confident further testing will confirm the soundness of the track, the decision to close is the right thing to do at this time.”
That same day, a filly named Lets Light The Way was injured and euthanized while training on the main track, as the equestrian publication Blood Horse reported.
“I loved that filly. I bought her at the sale—liked the way she walked,” trainer Ron McAnally told the publication. “I wanted to cry when we had to put her down.”
Like many, McAnally thinks bad recent weather contributed to the filly’s death. Southern California has been experiencing heavy rain this winter, which has the potential to impact the conditions of the track’s surface.
But experts aren’t sure that’s the problem here. Mick Peterson from the University of Kentucky conducted ground radar testing on the track, and he spoke with NPR’s Here & Now earlier this week about why the track is seeing death rates at twice the rate of the previous year.
“What we see in horse racing always is, the challenge at any track is unusual weather,” he says. But he hasn’t yet found anything unusual about the track conditions. “We’re looking at every option we can to begin to understand what’s happening,” he said. “This is not what we do as a sport.”
Santa Anita Park has expanded its testing now, bringing in its former track superintendent Dennis Moore. According to the track’s owners, he’ll use a machine that can approximate a horse running at a full gallop, to see how it impacts the surface.
“There’s no obvious answer. So every question is being asked: Is it the surface? Is it the horses that are running on the surface?” Rick Baedeker, the executive director of the California Horse Racing Board, told NPR’s All Things Considered. They’re also questioning factors such as the type of training the horses receive, he says.
Baedeker says he’s never seen anything like this. “It’s a nightmare for everybody involved in racing,” he says. The board is also seeking answers by carrying out a necropsy on every horse that died.
Particularly perplexing is the sheer diversity of the horses that have died, as Rick Arthur, chief equine veterinarian from the CHRB, told the Los Angeles Times.
“They are all over the place, from Battle Of Midway, a well-seasoned horse, to a first-time starter,” Arthur said. “They are from 19 different trainers. There is nothing that links them together.”
And, he says that we may never fully know why this is happening. “If you expect a definitive answer, I wouldn’t expect that,” Arthur told the Times. “We can hope that it identifies strategies that can make racing safer. It’s not just the track. It’s not just the horse. It’s the whole schedule. The training program. The racing program. Everything.”
The deaths have drawn outrage from PETA, which has called for a criminal investigation into the matter.
Baedeker says these deaths are coming at a time when the racing business has, over the last few years, taken steps to try to reduce racetrack deaths.
“People involved in racing, whether they’re fans or whether they’re owners or trainers, the common thread is the affection for the race horse — whether you enjoy watching them or taking care of them,” he says. “The current situation does not reflect the whole story.”
FDA Says It Found Asbestos In Makeup At Claire's

Claire’s stores, such as this one in New York, are a common sight in U.S. malls. The company says its “products are safe” and disputes the FDA’s findings, saying they “show significant errors.”
Seth Wenig/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Seth Wenig/AP
U.S. regulators say several makeup products from Claire’s stores tested positive for asbestos, a mineral that has been linked to deadly cancers.
The Food and Drug Administration tested makeup from Claire’s and the retailer Justice, both of which market their products to young girls and teens. In a statement Tuesday, the agency reported that it found that three product samples from Claire’s and one from Justice contained the substance, and it released a safety alert about the products.
Claire’s says that “out of an abundance of caution,” it has removed the three products — eye shadows, compact powder and contour powder — from stores and is “also removing any remaining talc based cosmetic products.” Talc is a substance that sometimes contains asbestos and has been linked to lung cancer in miners.
But Claire’s says its “products are safe” and disputes the test results, saying they “show significant errors.” The retailer says the tests “have mischaracterized fibers in the products as asbestos.”
Claire’s, which sells jewelry and accessories and pierces ears, is a common sight at shopping malls, with more than 2,400 locations in North America and Europe as of last August.
The FDA said the Justice product, a shimmer powder, had already been recalled from the market in 2017.
Other independent testers dispute Claire’s claim that these products are safe. The U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a consumer advocacy group, released results last March that said its testing showed that the same three Claire’s products contained asbestos.
Asbestos is believed to cause mesothelioma, a type of cancer affecting the lining of the chest and abdomen, and is linked to an increased risk of other forms of cancer and lung disease.
In its statement, the FDA called for more expansive authority to regulate cosmetics, saying the law about its role has not been updated since it first entered into force in 1938.
“The current law does not require cosmetics to be reviewed and approved by the FDA prior to being sold to American consumers,” it said, adding that total responsibility for the safety of these products now rests with the companies that make them.
“To be clear, there are currently no legal requirements for any cosmetic manufacturer marketing products to American consumers to test their products for safety,” the FDA said. For example, the agency says that in this case, it did not have the authority to force Claire’s to pull the potentially dangerous products off store shelves.
It says it wants to work with Congress to “modernize” the way cosmetics are regulated in the United States.
This isn’t the first time testers say they have found traces of asbestos in Claire’s products. The Dutch government said last year that it found asbestos in two products, following the release of the U.S. PIRG report. In response, Claire’s insisted that the products are safe and questioned the testing methodology.
Another company has also come under recent scrutiny over the risk of asbestos contamination. “Johnson & Johnson had known for decades about the risk of asbestos contamination in its popular baby powder and other talc-based body powders, but tried to keep negative information from reaching the public,” the New York Times reports. “The company received subpoenas for more information last month from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department.”
Trade War And Peace
Today, the U.S. confirmed it will hold off on a new round of tariffs on imports from China that was supposed to be put in place this month. There’s also word that President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are getting close to completing a trade deal, which would mean both countries getting rid of many of the tariffs and trade restrictions that have been put in place. Today on the show, Stacey talks to Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics about the trade war with China and asks, ‘Is a trade truce on the horizon?’
Music by Drop Electric. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.
Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.
Anonymous Mega Millions Lottery Winner Claims $1.5B Jackpot In South Carolina

The KC Mart in Simpsonville, S.C., after it was announced the winning $1.5 billion Mega Millions lottery ticket was purchased there in October 2018.
Jeffrey Collins/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeffrey Collins/AP
Someone in South Carolina claimed the $1.5 billion jackpot from the Mega Millions lottery held in October 2018, ending the mystery of whether anyone would ever come forward to say they had won.
The winner, who has elected to remain anonymous, chose the one-time payment cash option, making their prize worth nearly $878,000,000. It is the largest jackpot payout to a single winner in U. S. history, according to a statement by South Carolina Education Lottery Commission.
“We are delighted that the winner is a South Carolinian and has come forward to claim this remarkable prize,” said Hogan Brown, the commission’s executive director.
South Carolina is one in only a handful of states that allows lottery winners to keep their identities secret. The others are Delaware, Georgia, Kansas, Maryland, North Dakota, Ohio and Texas.
As the Associated Press reports, until now there was a great deal of speculation about why the winner had not yet claimed the prize, ranging from suspicions that he or she was a fugitive from the law, dead, or tied up in litigation.
The winner has retained the representation of New York law firm Rivkin Radler.
The winning numbers, by the way, were 5,28,62,65, 70 and the mega number 5. They were selected by a Quick Pick.
For The Few Who Heat Homes With Coal, It's Still King

John Ord of Susquehanna, Pa., loads 40-pound bags of anthracite coal into his car. He’s among the fewer than 130,000 households left in the United States that burn coal to heat their homes.
Jeff Brady/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeff Brady/NPR
Every few weeks, John Ord does something unusual for most people living in 2019 — he stops by a local hardware store in rural northeastern Pennsylvania to buy coal to heat his home.
He recently spent about $56 to buy 400 pounds of coal. That will keep his 2,400-square-foot house a toasty 70 to 72 degrees for a couple of weeks.
“This is the whole glamorous part, right here,” says Ord, as he loads 40-pound bags of Pennsylvania anthracite coal into the back of his white station wagon.
When he gets home, Ord lugs the coal down to his basement, where he rips open a bag, lifts it chest high and loads it into a hopper on the back of his coal-burning stove.
It’s a lot more work than most Americans with gas or electric heat go through to keep their homes warm. They can just set a thermostat and forget it. But Ord says this is actually less work than the wood stove he replaced last fall.
Ord loads a hopper on the back of his coal-burning stove. He says 400 pounds of coal will keep his 2,400-square-foot house between 70 and 72 degrees for a couple of weeks in the winter.
Jeff Brady/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeff Brady/NPR
“Between cutting it [wood], stacking it, letting it season, moving it into the space where you need to access it and then loading the stove,” Ord says, wood requires a lot more handling.
Ord’s coal-burning stove burns 24 hours a day when it’s cold. He likes the constant heat it gives off and says it’s cheaper than his other options — oil and electric.
While most power plants around the United States burn bituminous coal, northeastern Pennsylvania is very proud of its anthracite coal, which is shinier and harder than you might expect. Ord says it burns cleaner too.
Anthracite coal is mined in northeastern Pennsylvania. About 63,000 households in the state burn coal for heat.
Jeff Brady/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeff Brady/NPR
To demonstrate this, he goes outside and points up to a white chimney. “No smoke at all. There’s no smell to it,” says Ord.
But burning anthracite coal does emit more carbon dioxide per unit of heat than just about any other fuel, according to the Energy Information Administration. That makes it a contributor to climate change.
Anthracite backers point out that it has less sulfur than bituminous coal, but environmentalists say cleaner does not mean clean.
“It still emits quite a bit of dangerous sulfur dioxide, as well as heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, and mercury,” says Tom Schuster with the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign. He says anyone concerned about their contribution to climate change should avoid burning coal for heat.
Those in the anthracite coal business counter that the industry is so small that it’s not a big contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
“If you want to look at the major CO2 producers in the world, it’s not us,” says Matt Atkinson, co-owner of Leisure Line Stove Company in Berwick, Pa. “And even if we quadrupled our current sales, it still wouldn’t be a problem.”
Seeking a new generation of customers
There was a time when coal was king in the home-heating business. In 1940, more than half of U.S. homes burned coal, according to the Census Bureau. It was a big business and such a part of the culture that coal company ads were heard regularly on the radio.
Listen to a 1953 Blue Coal radio advertisement here:
(Credit: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission/Pennsylvania Anthracite Heritage Museum)
After decades of decline, fewer than 130,000 households use coal for heat today. Half of them are in Pennsylvania, and the state’s coal industry wants to boost that. It has a plan to attract more customers.
Atkinson is among those leading the campaign. He bought Leisure Line with a business partner in 2009 and says he got into the coal stove business after experiencing a friend’s stove.
Matt Atkinson, co-owner of Leisure Line Stove Company, in the firm’s Berwick, Pa., factory. His company hopes to encourage more people to switch to burning anthracite coal to heat their homes.
Jeff Brady/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeff Brady/NPR
“When I opened the door, I felt this warmth that I had never felt before. … And I was hooked instantly,” says Atkinson. Talk to coal-heat advocates in Pennsylvania, and you’ll hear this repeatedly — that there’s no heat as intense as coal heat.
It’s clear that many people in northeastern Pennsylvania, the heart of anthracite coal country, have an emotional attachment to this fossil fuel.
“You have people here that their great-great-grandfathers were miners. Their grandfathers were miners. It’s a family of mining,” says Andrew Meyers, sales manager for Blaschak Coal Corp. His company also is leading the campaign to attract new customers.
“It’s mostly about growing market share within the home-heating industry,” says Atkinson. He hopes to attract a new generation of customers with the message that they can save money on heating their home if they choose coal.
Kelly Brown stands in front of a pile of coal. Her family’s business, F.M. Brown’s Sons, has sold coal for nearly a century.
Jeff Brady/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jeff Brady/NPR
In Reading, Pa., Kelly Brown welcomes the campaign. Her family’s business, F.M. Brown’s Sons, has sold coal for nearly a century and is one of the few to survive the industry’s decline.
“In this general area, there was probably about 50 coal companies. Slowly, one by one, they started closing up,” says Brown. Now her company is the only one left in Berks County.
She says the industry has improved its environmental record over the years. Pennsylvania was the first state to pass an act to address abandoned-mine reclamation, and today coal companies like to tout their work in this area.
Given Pennsylvania’s abundant coal reserves and a bigger focus on improving coal’s environmental record, Brown hopes the industry will stage a comeback. “I might not see it in my lifetime, but I think things will turn around,” she says.
So far the trend is not moving in Brown’s favor. Even in Pennsylvania, the number of households using coal for heat continues a steady decline.
Voices Of Trapped Miners Fall Silent In Indonesia As Rescuers Race To Save Them

Rescuers stand at the entrance of a collapsed mine in Sulawesi, Indonesia, on Thursday. The shouting of trapped miners ceased on Saturday.
AP
hide caption
toggle caption
AP
The desperate shouts for help from gold miners who have been trapped for days under debris on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi have fallen silent, an official said Saturday.
The illegal mine collapsed on Tuesday in Bolaang Mongondow, after soil shifted in the sloping, green terrain and wooden support beams at the site suddenly broke.
Eight miners have died and 20 have been rescued, according to The Associated Press. About three dozen people are thought to still be trapped.
“Since yesterday, we have heard no more voices from inside,” said local disaster official Abdul Muin Paputungan, according to the AP. “On this fourth day, the signs of life faded away.”
Paputungan added that rescuers will still try to save the miners, “even though at the moment, it seems like a miracle if they can survive.”
Some have already lost hope.
“There is no hope for survivors,” said a spokesperson at the National Search and Rescue Agency, according to CNN.
The father of one trapped miner told Agence France-Presse earlier in the week that he had been talking with his son beneath the rubble.
“He asked for water because he was thirsty,” Amrin Simbala said. “Later in the afternoon, no more voices could be heard.”
More than 200 people have been working to rescue the trapped workers, using ropes, spades and their fingers in an attempt to carve out spaces in the ground. They were able to give food and water to some of the miners, but officials have expressed fear that oxygen is running out in some areas of the pit.
Miners who made it out were taken away on makeshift stretchers.
One survivor was pulled out of the debris after his leg was caught underneath a fallen rock. Medical personnel amputated the leg and he died from blood loss, according to AFP.
Authorities have hesitated to bring in more people and to use heavy machinery for fear of causing new landslides, Paputungan said. An excavator reportedly began to hollow out ground on Friday morning after relatives approved the plan.
For an archipelago rich with minerals, a number of illegal mines pockmark Indonesia’s landscape.
A World Bank report from 2000 detailed how traditional and small-scale mining persisted in the country despite the government’s awareness of environmental damage, either because of a lack of will or a lack of ability to halt the practice.
In one part of the country, West Java, some 26,000 people were working in illegal gold mines — a 500 percent increase in three years, the World Bank said.
In North Sulawesi, corruption prevented the closure of illegal mines, according to the report. The Ministry of Forestry mounted a campaign to crack down on illegal gold mining, but local police did not enforce government orders. Three months later, the same number of mines were operating.
In more recent years, authorities have raided unlicensed mines. Law enforcement arrested people on suspicion of trading illegally mined gold in 2016. After the arrest, the police station was set on fire in apparent retaliation, the AFP reported.
Locals are often lured into the business because they lack job opportunities.
“This is all I can do to earn a living,” a miner identified only as Iwan told AFP.
But illegal mines leave them vulnerable to hazardous work conditions.
Agus Budianto, a landslide expert at the Indonesia-based Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation, told CNN that local construction techniques of unlicensed mines don’t involve feasibility studies.
He said that on Tuesday, the supports for the shaft’s entrance caved under pressure from the soil, closing the miners’ exit path.
“This is not a landslide disaster, but it is caused by human activity itself,” he said.
Relatives of the trapped miners were gathering at the rescue site, offering to join the search and hoping for good news.
Texas Sharpens Aim At Surprise Medical Bills In Bipartisan Proposal

The proposed legislation aims to reduce patients’ costs by beefing up a Texas Department of Insurance program that scrutinizes surprise balance bills greater than $500 from any emergency health care provider.
Kameleon007/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Kameleon007/Getty Images
A bipartisan group of Texas lawmakers announced plans this week to address surprise medical bills in a way they believe would ease the burden on patients in the state.
During a news conference Thursday, state Sen. Kelly Hancock, a Republican from suburban Fort Worth, announced he had filed a bill in the Texas Legislature aimed at preventing medical providers from, among other things, balance billing patients — charging patients the difference between what the health care provider and the medical insurer think a medical service or procedure is worth. State Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, a Democrat from San Antonio, is filing a similar bill in the House.
If passed, the legislation would force medical providers and health insurers to mediate payment disputes before they send bills to patients. Hancock said the point of SB 1264 is to take “the burden off of patients.”
“[It] takes it off of their plates completely,” Hancock said.
He highlighted the case of Drew Calver, a public school teacher in Austin whose six-figure hospital bill after a heart attack was featured in a “Bill of the Month” investigation last summer by NPR, Kaiser Health News and KUT, NPR’s member station in Austin. Hancock noted Calver’s bill was reduced after the media attention but said it shouldn’t take such attention for a patient to get a reasonable bill.
Under this legislation, both sides of the payment dispute would settle their issues through an existing balance bill mediation program. The Texas Department of Insurance program has been successful in lowering medical bills across the state.
The legislation would beef up the program, which addresses surprise balance bills greater than $500 from all emergency providers — including free-standing emergency departments and all out-of-network providers working at a network facility.
“This is designed to apply in situations where patients don’t have any choice which facility they go to or which physician is involved in their care,” Hancock said.
Historically, the Insurance Department’s mediation program had many loopholes, and few consumers qualified for help. It was expanded in 2017, though, and more patients have been filing complaints.
For example, in 2014, the department was asked to mediate 686 medical bills. During the 2018 fiscal year, it received 4,445 bills.
Hancock said the program, so far, has saved Texas patients $30 million.
Still, consumer advocates argue, the system works only when patients know mediation is an option.
Stacey Pogue, a senior policy analyst with the Center for Public Policy Priorities, said patients don’t always know help is available, or they find the process intimidating.
“The instructions for how to do it are on your medical bill and your explanation of benefits — the most indecipherable documents you are going to get,” she told KUT earlier this year.
She and others have argued Texas should adopt a program similar to those in other states like New York, California and Florida, whose systems are more consumer-friendly.
Martinez Fischer said it’s time Texas officials stepped in to help patients who are caught in the middle of disputes between medical providers and health insurers. “It has been an industry issue for a few years, I grant you that — the health plans and the providers fighting over their business interests,” he said. “And I respect that. But 10 years later, it is a consumer issue.”
Among other things, Hancock’s bill would allow people with federally regulated, self-funded health plans to opt into the state’s mediation program. According to Hancock, those plans make up about 40 percent of Texas’ insurance market, but those consumers are currently not able to take part in the program.
Hancock said this should provide relief to consumers while federal lawmakers weigh their own efforts to address surprise medical bills.
“Texas will send a loud and clear signal to D.C. that similar consumer protections need to be passed at the federal level,” Hancock said. “Until then, Texas … [is] committed to doing something about it.”
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat who represents Austin in Congress, said he is encouraged by Texas’ efforts but called federal protections “essential.”
“Only approval in Congress of legislation like my End Surprise Billing Act can both protect those who work for large employers with self-funded, federally regulated ERISA plans and assure that patients across America are not forced to pay the price for conflicts between insurers and health care providers,” Doggett said in a written statement.
This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with KUT and Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service of the Kaiser Family Foundation. You can follow Ashley Lopez on Twitter: @AshLopezRadio
Dancing On The Debt Ceiling
The periodic requirement for Congress to vote on raising the debt ceiling has become a reliable piece of political theater. The vote usually follows the passage of a budget by the Congress, and a hike in the debt ceiling rarely gets a green light without some drama.
It’s a little like a person who orders up a five course dinner and drinks and then threatens not to pay when the bill arrives. But, this political theater invariably ends the same way: Congress raises the debt ceiling. Treasury pays the bills. Everyone moves on.
But what would happen if Congress said no? What if it didn’t raise the debt ceiling and the US suddenly didn’t have access to the money it needed to pay its bills? As Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell put it, “It’s beyond even considering.”
Today on the Indicator, we consider it.
Music by Drop Electric. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.
Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.
What North Korea's Economy Looks Like
NPR’S Mary Louise Kelly speaks with Travis Jeppesen, author of See you Again in Pyongyang about his article in The New York Times Magazine describing North Korea’s economy.
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
The U.S. negotiating position at the summit underway in Hanoi rests on an assumption that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un wants to develop his country’s economy – wants to open it to the world – and that he wants this badly enough that he may be persuaded to bargain away some, or all, of his country’s nuclear weapons. In truth, North Korea’s once fully communist system was already cracked open back in the 1990s, fueled by famine and by the loss of Soviet support. And today, the black market flourishes on scales both small and large. Travis Jeppesen writes about this in an essay headlined “Shopping In Pyongyang.” It’s in The New York Times Magazine. Jeppesen has made multiple trips to North Korea, including to study Korean at a university there. He joins us now from Berlin. Travis Jeppesen, hello.
TRAVIS JEPPESEN: Hello.
KELLY: So start with the data, or what little there is of it, because data on North Korea’s economy is famously hard to come by. What do we actually know about its size, about the black markets, about its interaction with the rest of the world?
JEPPESEN: Well, like you said, data is very hard to come by. For one reason, the North Koreans don’t publish this kind of data. However, there are some South Korean economists who have studied this phenomenon by taking surveys mostly with North Korean defectors, and many of them have concluded that 90 percent or even more of daily consumer transactions take place in these markets.
KELLY: When you say these markets, what are you talking about?
JEPPESEN: They were originally black markets that sprung up during the years of the famine, but in recent years, a lot of them have been legitimized by the government and have become fully functional white markets. And then there are a variety of sort of semi-legal grey markets. And so if you have money in North Korea, you can buy virtually anything you want.
KELLY: Another phenomenon underway in North Korea is the rise of a class of nouveau riche. Their name is the donju. Describe who they are.
JEPPESEN: These are kind of the – what we would call the yuppies of North Korea who enjoy positions of a certain prestige in society. Oftentimes, they’re wearing expensive jewelry, Rolex watches or Western brands.
KELLY: You described meeting one for a drink at his favorite gastropub, and he shows up in Dolce & Gabbana and neon Nikes.
JEPPESEN: Yes, yes. Yeah.
KELLY: And how do they have money? They’re participating in the grey economy, black, white – where’s their money coming from, and what are they spending it on?
JEPPESEN: The donju, because they are now given permission essentially, to engage in moneymaking activities, they basically are taking commissions, and they’re taking kickbacks. They are able to enjoy the profits that they make, and they pass along the rest to their protectors in the government. So it almost forms an alternate taxation system in a country where there is no official income tax.
KELLY: To be clear, this is not the norm in North Korean society. There’s still poverty throughout much of the country.
JEPPESEN: Oh, yes. Yeah, yeah. Even though, you know, you can see these people in increasing numbers on the streets of Pyongyang, it is true that probably the vast majority of North Koreans are still living in poverty. And certainly, I saw evidence of great poverty.
KELLY: Let me ask you the big picture question, which is what risk does all of this interaction with the outside world pose for Kim Jong Un – I mean, in the sense that loosening his regime’s grasp on the economy might risk loosening the regime’s grasp on power?
JEPPESEN: Yeah, it’s an interesting question. However, if we look at the great big example next door, China in the 1980s under Deng Xiaoping was able to find a way to sort of open up the economy while at the same time maintaining its one-party system. So I believe that Kim Jong Un is hoping he can go in a similar direction.
KELLY: That’s writer Travis Jeppesen. Thanks so much.
JEPPESEN: Thank you very much.
KELLY: Jeppesen’s book about his time in North Korea is called “See You Again In Pyongyang.”
(SOUNDBITE OF SPOON’S “INSIDE OUT”)
Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Support Pours In For Walmart Workers With Disabilities After Company Announcement
News of Walmart’s decision to get rid of door greeters continues to rock communities that advocate for workers with disabilities.
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
Support is pouring in from around the country for workers with disabilities who are worried about losing their jobs as greeters for Walmart. The company is removing greeters from stores around the country. Walmart says about a thousand stores have already eliminated the position and another thousand are doing it now. Last night, NPR’s Alina Selyukh was the first to report on this national move by Walmart. She’s been gathering reaction today and is in the studio with us now.
Hi, Alina.
ALINA SELYUKH, BYLINE: Hello.
SHAPIRO: What has been the response so far?
SELYUKH: Well, I think there’s been this groundswell of realization that this is happening nationwide. The families and their friends have been forming support groups online. More and more stories are popping up on local news. And I’ve also counted at least 17 petitions launched online in recent days asking Walmart to save these jobs. People are describing their personal connections to their local greeters, the smile that makes their day. They’re demanding Walmart keep the greeters.
As of today, I’ve now spoken to seven greeters with disabilities directly or through their families. They’re from seven different states. One of them is Simon Cantrell, who is 21 and works as a greeter in South Carolina.
SIMON CANTRELL: I know people are very proud of me and how hard I work. But I just don’t understand why they just want to get rid of greeters.
SHAPIRO: OK. He uses the phrase get rid of greeters. Is that exactly what Walmart is doing here?
SELYUKH: Right. There is a lot of confusion and dismay about that. Well, essentially, Walmart has been replacing greeters with this new job called customer host. So it pays a bit more. It has extended responsibilities. The idea is to have a new type of greeter who is also a security guard and can also wrangle carts or help shoppers a bit more. And this job has new requirements that can be impossible to do if you’re in a wheelchair, like lifting 25 pounds or standing for long periods of time. In one case, a worker with a learning disability was told that he likely didn’t qualify for the customer host job because of his handwriting in reports. And several workers said that they were told that they don’t qualify for other jobs in the store because they all require the ability to climb a ladder.
A few greeters with disabilities have also mentioned that their hours have been cut back recently and severely. I spoke to one former greeter, Elizabeth de la Cruz from Texas, who says she’s been on an extended leave of absence now for a year-and-a-half.
ELIZABETH DE LA CRUZ: It was not right what Walmart did to me. You know, the manager agreed to hiring me. And then to just let me go because I have a disability, that wasn’t right.
SELYUKH: De la Cruz has filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on which Walmart has not commented to NPR.
SHAPIRO: OK. So that was a year-and-a-half ago. How long…
SELYUKH: Right.
SHAPIRO: …Has this been happening?
SELYUKH: In 2016 was when Walmart originally outlined this plan to replace the traditional people greeter with the customer host. We’re now in the big second wave that was announced to workers last week. And some people have pointed out Walmart is in serious competition against Amazon for dominance. It has been in a bit of a makeover. And Walmart has said that these changes are part of its effort to better help shoppers.
And this is a big deal because Walmart is the largest private employer in the U.S. It employs a lot of people with disabilities. So with these changes, they have been starting to see some legal action. In addition to the EEOC claim from Elizabeth de la Cruz we heard earlier, there is another one in Michigan, one filed in Wisconsin. Another former greeter is also suing Walmart in Utah. And Walmart has not commented to NPR on any of those cases.
SHAPIRO: Walmart has not commented to NPR on those cases. But what, generally, is Walmart saying about this issue as it plays out around the country?
SELYUKH: Yes. They have said that since the change has been announced, they’ve had people with physical disabilities find other roles – or at least other job offers – in stores. But the big update is about the deadline. Originally, Walmart said on April 26 was the date when customer hosts would replace the greeters. The greeters would go away in many stores; customer hosts would come in. Well, now Walmart says greeters with physical disabilities will get more time to sort out their jobs.
And to be clear, the Americans with Disabilities Act does not stop companies from changing job descriptions as they need. But the law does require companies to provide, quote, “reasonable accommodations” as long as the worker can do the essential functions of the job. And the workers I’ve spoken to are hopeful but also anxious to see if Walmart will actually find accommodations for them.
SHAPIRO: That’s NPR’s Alina Selyukh. Thank you very much.
SELYUKH: Thank you.
Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.