Business

No Image

Activists Gather To Push For $15 Federal Minimum Wage

As activists gather in Richmond, Va. for a rally in support of a $15 minimum wage, stakeholders on both sides of the debate speak about how best to raise wages across the country.

Transcript

ALLISON AUBREY, HOST:

This week, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton both gave speeches highlighting their economic policies, and we wanted to spotlight one policy that hasn’t gotten too much attention this political season – raising the minimum wage. The federal minimum wage stands at $7.25 an hour. But polls show that most Americans think it needs to go up.

So far, some states have moved to increase the minimum wage, including California, New York, Oregon, and some big cities have passed wage hikes, too, such as Seattle, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Now, one thing is clear. The next president has said he or she will support a minimum wage increase. Here’s Donald Trump a few weeks back talking about his plan.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

DONALD TRUMP: So I would like to raise it to at least $10. And what I’m going to do is I’m going to bring jobs back to this country, so that people can start working again so that the $10 and the $15 and the numbers you’re talking about are going to be literally – they’re going to be peanuts compared to what people can make in the country.

AUBREY: Hillary Clinton has said she would support a blanket hike of the federal minimum wage to $12 an hour and would consider as much as 15 an hour if it worked like the hike in New York, where an increase is phased in over several years and wages for workers in the city, where cost of living is highest – are higher than wages in parts of the state where it’s not as expensive to live. Here’s Clinton speaking on Thursday.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

HILLARY CLINTON: Raising the federal minimum wage won’t just put more money in the pockets of low-income families. It also means they will spend more at the businesses in their neighborhoods.

AUBREY: The debate is front and center today as thousands are gathering in Richmond, Va. at a union-backed convention calling for a federal minimum wage of $15 an hour. We wanted to check in on that rally, so we called Reid Snider who has been talking to advocates there. Hey, Reid.

REID SNIDER, BYLINE: Hi, Allison. How are you?

AUBREY: I’m fine. So tell us what is the scene there?

SNIDER: Well, it’s a very hot day in Richmond with temperatures hovering around 95 to 96 degrees. The crowd was very hot, but they were very vocal in their vision on this rally. The mood is very energetic, I might add. I would say probably about five to 8,000 people in general – it’s hard to tell. They’re very spread out. And they left from the Monroe Park down near the campus of Virginia Commonwealth University and moved up the very famous Monument Avenue to the Robert E. Lee Memorial, where they say they are making the case that in the current minimum wage situation and the oppression that they live in is a result of the Civil War and racism.

AUBREY: So that’s the symbolism of marching along those monuments.

SNIDER: Absolutely. That’s why it ended at the Robert E. Lee Memorial to raise awareness that this is a straggler of that old system of oppression in government, they say.

AUBREY: So what are you hearing from people at this convention?

SNIDER: Well, by and large, they are in favor, of course, of higher minimum wages. Many of them that I talked to work in industries that are based on a minimum wage, and they say they really can’t afford to live at the current 7.25 rate here in the mid-Atlantic region in general.

AUBREY: I guess the movement is pushing for $15 an hour. Is there a sense there among people you talk to that that’s realistic?

SNIDER: Well, it’s interesting you should ask, Allison, I asked some of the folks that I stopped along the march up to the Robert E. Lee Monument about that. And they said, well, it is a tough situation, but, you know, as a civilization, we’re just going to have to move that way so that many people can afford to live, buy insurance, feed their children and they would also like a union.

AUBREY: That’s Reid Snider of WCVE at the Fight for 15 Convention in Richmond, Va. Thanks, Reid.

SNIDER: Thanks, Allison.

AUBREY: Now, to get a fuller picture, we reached out to people who have a lot at stake in this debate. We start with a story of longtime restaurant worker and Fight for 15 organizer Terrence Wise. He lives in Kansas City. He’s 37 years old and the father of three. We reached him in Richmond ahead of the rally.

TERRENCE WISE: I actually started working at 16. I got my first job at Taco Bell. I can remember minimum wage back then was 4.25 an hour. And I’ve been working in the industry for nearly two decades now. I currently work at a McDonald’s and Burger King, and despite my experience and years on the job, I only make $9 an hour at both jobs – no benefits, no vacation, no paid time off.

AUBREY: Wise has pretty much always worked minimum-wage jobs, and he says it’s always a struggle to make ends meet. He and his family rely on food stamps and other public benefit programs.

WISE: Nothing’s ever fully paid. It’s like always you put this much on the light bill or you put this much on the gas bill, and you just pray that a disconnect notice doesn’t come.

AUBREY: Now, at one point, he told us that his life spiraled out of control. It was after his fiance got sick.

WISE: It was the second time that me and my fiance and my three little girls – we experienced homelessness. Anytime you’re working in our industries – or are working without benefits or anything of that nature, one little illness – a week off for the flu or you get hurt or something – and you miss that paycheck, you’re struggling. You’re behind right there.

And we lost our home, and we were sleeping in our minivan – me and my fiance and my three little girls. And I can recall the morning we woke up and me and my fiance were getting ready for work in the front seat. I’m putting on my Burger King uniform. She’s putting on her CNA scrubs, and in the back of the minivan the girls are getting ready for school, getting backpacks on, putting socks on.

And that just really hit me. We’re in America, the richest nation on Earth. And here you have two working parents getting ready for work in the front seat of their minivan while their three daughters are getting ready for school in the back of it, homeless. Something’s terribly wrong in this country when you have a family that is working doubly hard. We’re working triple hard, and things just aren’t getting better.

AUBREY: And so Terrence Wise says it didn’t take much to convince him to join the union movement fighting for a higher minimum wage.

WISE: It was a Sunday. I was at Burger King, and I was mopping the lobby, I remember. And I can remember a McDonald’s worker and a Domino’s worker. They came in the Burger King I was working and they had started talking about how workers around Kansas City were now organizing to demand a living wage, and they asked me and my co-workers a set of questions that day when they came in. I’m like OK.

And then they’re like, do you guys think you need a living wage? And I’m like living wage? What’s that? Sounds like money to live off. Yeah, that sounds good. And they’re just like do you think you deserve benefits to go see the dentist or whatever? And I’m like, yeah, that would be really nice. I haven’t been to a dentist in 18 years. And do you think you deserve a vacation? Shouldn’t all working Americans have a vacation once a year? I’m like yeah. I haven’t seen my mom in 10 years. That would be nice. So…

AUBREY: You hadn’t seen your mother in 10 years?

WISE: Oh, definitely not, definitely not. I’m in Kansas City, Mo. I’m from South Carolina, and that’s where my mom lives at now. And I don’t get time off of work, really, to go see her or have the resources to travel and see her, not even once a year.

AUBREY: So Terrence Wise got involved with the Fight for 15. The movement has gained a lot of traction over the last two years staging rallies in dozens of U.S. cities and grabbing headlines and TV coverage around the nation. But not everyone feels that a higher minimum wage is the answer.

Robert Mayfield owns nine Dairy Queen franchises in the Austin, Texas, area. He says hiking the minimum wage will lead to higher prices on his menus and job losses.

ROBERT MAYFIELD: I’m opposed to any time the government gets involved and meddles in the marketplace.

AUBREY: Mayfield says if the minimum wage is pushed much higher, some small business owners would stop hiring people, and he says that’s already happened to some extent.

MAYFIELD: People that are listening to your program will remember the times they used to go into a fast food restaurant and one of the employees would give them a drink before the time they ordered. Now it’s all self-service, and that’s because when labor becomes so expensive, you do what you can to eliminate some of it. And that’s a job that no longer even exists in fast food – somebody pouring the drinks and giving them to you. You make your own drink, and that’s the reason.

AUBREY: So people would be replaced by machines, by automation?

MAYFIELD: They already have been. They already are in my stores. It’s a self-service drink.

AUBREY: Mayfield says the market should determine the wages, and in his case in Austin, Texas, he already pays higher than the minimum wage. We start out at $12 an hour.

MAYFIELD: And we don’t do that because we’re nice guys, we do that ’cause there is a labor market, and we do that to get the best people because the best people are what we’ve got to have.

AUBREY: Robert Mayfield says he’s moved by stories he hears from people like Terrence Wise, but he’s skeptical of the Fight for 15 movement.

MAYFIELD: I’m empathetic to hear the story. The first thing I would tell that individual is to see if you can find another job with another company where your skills might be better utilized. What I do know about the so-called Fight for 15 is that it’s sponsored by labor unions that are losing members all over the country, as I understand it, and those are the ones that I’ve read in several sources that are behind that whole so-called movement or demonstrations. It’s the service unions, labor unions hoping to get more members, best as I can tell.

AUBREY: Labor unions are, in fact, organizing the Fight for 15 movement, and while raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour is unlikely given the current political landscape, supporters say the movement has already changed the conversation. McDonald’s and Walmart are two of the major companies that have raised starting salaries by some amount since the Fight for 15 took off. Both companies have come under a lot of pressure from labor groups to boost wages. Terrence Wise says he’s optimistic.

WISE: The way out, I tell you, is what we’re doing now. If you look back in this country in the paths and what workers are doing now, it’s always been movements that have changed the country. We know that even our elected leaders and politicians – they don’t just come up with their own great ideas. They go with whatever the people push them.

And we know with this presidential election cycle the main topic is wage inequality and racial inequality in this country. You hear it on so many platforms, and I think that’s been brought about by what workers have been doing across the country. And that’s been organizing and coming together and telling their stories and fighting to win better pay and union rights at the job, and I think that’s truly the way out.

AUBREY: That’s fast food worker and organizer Terrence Wise. He’s attending today’s Fight for 15 convention in Richmond, Va.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Fox News Names Roger Ailes' Replacements

Two Fox News insiders have been tapped to fill the shoes of outgoing Chairman and Chief Executive Roger Ailes, who was forced to resign as a result of allegations he sexually harassed a former female news anchor.

Bill Shine and Jack Abernethy were named as co-presidents in a statement released by Fox News Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch. Shine will direct all programming at Fox News and Fox Business Network. Abernethy will handle the business side: finance, sales, advertising and distribution for both networks.

My fully updated story on today’s big @FoxNews promotions — Bill Shine and Jack Abernethy now running the show https://t.co/2xhrrKdjOa

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 12, 2016

Fox News also announced the retirement of Mark Kranz, chief financial officer, who had been with the network since 1997.

“Bill Shine has developed and produced a signature primetime that has dominated the cable news landscape for 14 of his 20 years with FOX News,” Murdoch said in his statement. “Jack was integral to the launch and success of FOX News nearly 20 years ago and we’re delighted he’s returning to take on this additional role. “

Shine and Abernethy were promoted as the company is dealing with the fallout from a lawsuit filed by former anchor Gretchen Carlson, alleging that Ailes pressured her for sex and then retaliated against her when she rebuffed him. Since then, several other female employees, past and current, have made similar allegations.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

After Criticism, Trump Adds Women To His Economic Advisory Team

Left: Anthony Scaramucci; Center: Carla Sands; Right: Betsy McCaughey

Left: Anthony Scaramucci; Center: Carla Sands; Right: Betsy McCaughey Left: Slaven Vlasic; Center: Charley Gallay; Right: Darren McCollester/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Left: Slaven Vlasic; Center: Charley Gallay; Right: Darren McCollester/Getty Images

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has released a second list of economic advisers in less than a week, and this time the names are almost all women.

The advisers include several longtime GOP fundraisers, including Diane Hendricks, co-founder and chairman of ABC Supply in Wisconsin, who was called “America’s richest self-made woman” by Forbes magazine.

New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey, who wrote several influential but highly controversial articles criticizing Hillary Clinton’s health care proposals in the 1990s, is also on the list. More recently, she has written books taking on the Affordable Care Act.

“We are continuing to work every day to bring in the best and brightest minds to save our country’s economy,” Trump said in a statement. “These new members of our team are some of the best economic minds around right now, and they will continue to bring new ideas to our campaign that will strengthen and grow our economy. We can finally Make America Great Again and ensure all Americans have a chance to succeed at the American Dream.”

The release of the names comes six days after the Trump campaign put out an earlier list of advisers that was criticized for consisting entirely of white men.

Like the initial list, this one contains few people who would be considered actual economists.

A lone exception is Judy Shelton, senior fellow and co-director of the Atlas Sound Money Project, which is partly funded by the Koch brothers.

Several have ties to right-wing organizations, including Brooke Rollins, president and CEO of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank. Also affiliated with the foundation is Kathleen Hartnett White, a staunch critic of President Obama’s efforts to address climate change.

Others come from the worlds of business and finance, including Carla Sands, chairman of Vintage Capital group, an investment firm she founded with her late husband.

Liz Uihlein is president of Uline, Inc., a shipping and packaging company. She and her husband, Richard, are known for giving heavily to very conservative political candidates.

The only man on the latest list is Anthony Scaramucci, co-managing partner and found of the investment firm SkyBridge Capital.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Slaughterhouses Often Face Meager Safety Violations, Critics Say

Hundreds of thousands of people go to work each day preparing the beef, pork and poultry that ends up on our dinner tables. Their workplace is among the most hazardous in the country. Slaughterhouses — while safer than they were decades ago — can exact a steep price from workers. As it tries to enforce safety rules, the government fines the businesses for violations, but one former official calls those fines ineffective and “embarrassingly low.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Utility Giant PG&E Convicted of Violating Gas Pipeline Safety Laws

A natural gas line lies broken in San Bruno, Calif., after a massive explosion on September 9, 2010. A federal jury found Pacific Gas & Electric Co., California's largest utility, guilty of misleading investigators about how it was identifying high-risk pipelines.

A natural gas line lies broken in San Bruno, Calif., after a massive explosion on September 9, 2010. A federal jury found Pacific Gas & Electric Co., California’s largest utility, guilty of misleading investigators about how it was identifying high-risk pipelines. Noah Berger/AP hide caption

toggle caption Noah Berger/AP

A federal jury found Pacific Gas and Electric Company guilty on five felony counts of failing to adequately inspect its gas pipelines before the blast that incinerated a neighborhood in San Bruno, Calif., in September 2010. The utility was also found guilty of one count of misleading federal investigators about the standard it used to identify high-risk pipelines.

PG&E was acquitted on six other charges of violating pipeline safety laws.

The blast came without warning in the early evening. It killed eight people, seriously injured 38 others and destroyed 58 homes in the suburb just south of San Francisco.

The explosion was caused by a bad internal seam weld in a pipeline installed in the 1950s. According to PG&E records, that weld didn’t exist.

Government prosecutors argued during the trial that PG&E maintained shoddy records and failed to monitor aging pipelines. They said PG&E managers knew that their records were unreliable. One company memo described the database as containing “a ton of errors.

The utility was acquitted on charges of knowingly failing to maintain proper records. But it was found guilty of the most serious charges: failing to identify high-risk pipelines, not prioritizing the most serious hazards, and not using the most accurate means for inspecting pipelines.

The company defense was to portray itself as a collection of hard-working employees who performed to the best of their abilities in the face of ambiguous regulations.

The trial lasted for more than a month and the jury deliberated for over seven days.

The utility faces a maximum penalty of $3 million, or $500,000 for each count. The government originally sought $562 million in potential penalties. That would have been twice the amount of money prosecutors argued that PG&E saved by cutting safety programs. But last week prosecutors shocked many court-watchers by slashing the potential fines.

Prosecutors had no immediate comment following the verdict.

In a statement, PG&E said: “We have made unprecedented progress in the nearly six years since the tragic San Bruno accident and we are committed to maintaining our focus on safety. We want our customers and their families to know that we are committed to re-earning their trust.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Vail Resorts To Buy Canada's Whistler Blackcomb For $1.06 Billion

Norwegian skiers compete in the 2010 Olympics in Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. The Whistler Blackcomb resort is being acquired by Vail Resorts of the U.S.

Norwegian skiers compete in the 2010 Olympics in Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. The Whistler Blackcomb resort is being acquired by Vail Resorts of the U.S. Matthias Schrader/AP hide caption

toggle caption Matthias Schrader/AP

Colorado-based ski-industry giant Vail Resorts has inked a $1.06 billion deal to acquire Whistler Blackcomb in Canada, one of the largest and most visited ski area in North America.

Vail operates ski areas and mountain resort properties in five states and Australia and has long eyed an expansion into Canada. A competitor and site of the 2010 Winter Olympics, Whistler has been a perennial profit winner too. In the last fiscal year, an estimated two million skiers visited the resort generating a record $241 million in revenue, according to the resort.

Beyond the bookkeeping, for skiers and snowboarders, Whistler is considered to be one of the choicest destinations in the world. It’s massive: more than 8,000 acres of terrain including three glaciers. Top to bottom, the two combined mountains of Whistler and Blackcomb also boast more than a mile long vertical drop, the altitude giving the resort some of the longest ski seasons in the business.

“Whistler Blackcomb is one of the most iconic mountain resorts in the world with an incredible history, passionate employees and a strong community,” said Rob Katz, Vail’s CEO, in a written statement.

Whistler CEO Dave Brownlie predicted the merger would make both resorts stronger and more appealing to skiers and guests, calling it “the most exciting and transformative investment in Whistler Blackcomb’s history.”

Facing declining snowfall and season pass sales in recent years, ski resorts have sought to partner and share revenue from ticket sales and other promotions, as well as merge in some cases, to cope. Vail acquiring one of its long-time competitors is significant, yet not all that surprising to industry analysts.

The company’s expansions have been particularly aggressive of late and not without controversy.

In 2014, Vail’s purchase of Park City Mountain Resort in Utah prompted opposition from local skier advocacy groups. In Colorado, the company is a frequent target of environmentalists, who criticize Vail’s terrain expansions into what they consider critical wildlife habitat, notably a 2012 dust-up over Breckenridge ski area’s “Peak 6” expansion.

If they get government approval, the companies hope to finalize the deal this fall.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Tech Companies Embrace Election Season

More than ever before, U.S. elections are a business opportunity. Social media companies are capitalizing on attention spent on the candidates.

Transcript

AILSA CHANG, HOST:

You may already feel bombarded with election news this morning, but if you’ve logged into Facebook, Twitter or Snapchat, you’re likely to be inundated with even more. That’s because for social media platforms, it’s just good business. NPR’s Scott Detrow has more on how tech companies are embracing the election.

SCOTT DETROW, BYLINE: Walking the halls of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, there were tech companies everywhere you looked.

All right, so this is Connect with Skype at the RNC. It’s a Skype booth. What it basically looks like is a little paneled off area where you can have a Skype call.

Skype, Twitter, Microsoft – it went on and on; same at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

And we are standing in the Oval Office.

CRYSTAL PATTERSON: Yeah. We have built a mini Oval Office for people to post on Instagram.

DETROW: That’s Crystal Patterson who works on Facebook’s political outreach team. This mini Oval Office was just one part of a larger lounge the company set up inside the Wells Fargo Center.

PATTERSON: It feels very Facebooky (ph). It’s very bright, open and colorful. More importantly, there’s a lot of areas for people to create content, so people can go live pretty easily.

DETROW: And we should note that Facebook does pay NPR and other leading news organizations to produce video that run on the site. In downtown Philadelphia, Twitter was offering something very similar. Sitting at a table in the back, Twitter’s Jenna Golden said the company was giving out free food, coffee and Wi-Fi.

JENNA GOLDEN: This is supposed to be home base for a host of different people, including our advertising clients, our media partners, any very important tweeters.

DETROW: Why all the freebies and fancy displays? Because Twitter and Facebook are competing with each other, and every other social media company, for your time and attention. They both spent a lot of money to make sure that when people were reporting on the convention or sharing their convention experience, Facebook or Twitter would be a part of it. That makes sense to Tim Calkins, a marketing professor at Northwestern University.

TIM CALKINS: It really – it’s true for any big event in a sense, but elections are a little different because they’re huge events and the build-up commands a lot of attention, a lot of activity, and it goes on for a long time.

DETROW: Cozying up to an election in order to get more attention for your company is nothing new and isn’t limited to technology. Calkins says for years Kraft Macaroni & Cheese would make special election year pasta.

CALKINS: So when the Republican convention was going on, they would have the, you know, elephant macaroni and when the Democratic convention was going on, they would have the donkey macaroni.

DETROW: Social media is all about conversation. And this year, there’s no bigger conversation topic than a contentious high-profile national election. But for social media companies, and especially Twitter, there’s one big factor that’s much more effective than trendy VIP hangouts at conventions. It’s the fact that Donald Trump won the Republican nomination with a communications strategy that relied heavily on tweets.

CALKINS: And that’s exactly the sort of message that Twitter wants to get out there. You know, they’d love to go to companies and say, you know what? You no longer even need to worry about traditional advertising because today you can just rely on us.

DETROW: So all the time that Facebook and Twitter spent wooing people at the convention, the truth is most of those people were already probably spending most of the day staring at their phones waiting to see what Donald Trump had to say next. Scott Detrow, NPR News.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

At This English Bar, An Old-School Solution To Rude Cellphones

Drinks on a bar

Liam Norris/Getty Images/Cultura Exclusive

There was a time when people went to bars to talk to other people, maybe even meet someone new. But that was in the BC era — before cellphones.

“I’ve been in the pub industry for a long time, and progressively it’s become less and less social and more and more antisocial,” Steve Tyler, the owner of the Gin Tub in Sussex, England, tells NPR’s Scott Simon.

And that’s bad for business. So Tyler wanted to bring back the conversation, and he did by turning his bar into a Faraday cage — a 19th-century invention that reflects electromagnetic fields and conducts currents around, rather than inside, an enclosure.

He installed copper wire mesh in the bar’s ceiling and tin foil on the walls, effectively blocking cell phone signals from getting into the establishment.

A woman sits in a Faraday cage that is struck by lightning that was produced by a large transformer the Phaeno Science Centre in Wolfsburg, Germany, on Aug. 24, 2007. A Faraday cage is a 19th-century invention that reflects electromagnetic fields and conducts currents around, rather than inside, an enclosure.

A woman sits in a Faraday cage that is struck by lightning that was produced by a large transformer the Phaeno Science Centre in Wolfsburg, Germany, on Aug. 24, 2007. A Faraday cage is a 19th-century invention that reflects electromagnetic fields and conducts currents around, rather than inside, an enclosure. Fabian Bimmer/AP hide caption

toggle caption Fabian Bimmer/AP

“It’s not military grade,” Tyler says, but “it does its job.”

Tyler says that, because it doesn’t send a signal to jam phones, the setup is totally legal. But just in case, the Gin Tub has a sign at its entrance that tells people exactly what they’re getting into: “No Wi-Fi, no signal, just friends.”

A week in, Tyler says that people are loving the change.

“I think I’ve hit a nerve in the world, that I think it’s rude, and I think society has accepted people on their phones in bars and in places where it’s socially unacceptable,” he says.

He hasn’t seen sight of any imitators, but Tyler is confident that his approach — or at least the general idea — will win out.

“I think this is gonna be the new way forward for restaurants and bars and clubs,” he says.

Without phones in their hands, people are no longer drinking in silence but instead talking with each other. Tyler says that’s how bars were intended.

“It’s like Cheers, the TV program, when you walk in everyone knows your name,” Tyler says. “Well, there are no pubs now where everyone knows your name.”

That is, except within the Faraday cage.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

U.S. Economy Continues Growth Ahead Of Presidential Election

With new jobs numbers out Friday and the recent anemic growth in the GDP, NPR takes stock of the economy three months before the election.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

It’s been a good summer for people looking for work. The Labor Department says U.S. employers added 255,000 jobs last month. That’s a lot more than expected, and it’s the second month in a row in which the economy grew by more than a quarter million workers. These monthly reports are going to start to play a role in how voters see the economy as we get closer to the November election. Here’s NPR’s Scott Horsley.

SCOTT HORSLEY, BYLINE: Tom Maher runs a temporary employment company in Dayton, Ohio, a major center of manufacturing, warehousing and swing-state politics. Late last year, Maher’s business weathered a slowdown in hiring. But so far, he says 2016 has been a story of steady growth.

TOM MAHER: We have more work available than we have people to take the jobs.

HORSLEY: With unemployment just 4.9 percent, Maher says many businesses he recruits workers for are having to pay more.

MAHER: We’ve been working very hard over the last 12 to 18 months to convince our clients that we do need to begin to increase hourly rates, and we’re starting to see success now. The rates are going up, but I don’t think they’re up as high as they need to be.

HORSLEY: Nationwide, wages are on track to grow nearly 3 percent this year, well above the rate of inflation. And hundreds of thousands of new workers entered the labor force last month. In theory, that positive economic news should be good for Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton since voters have less incentive to shift course in the White House. But there’s a caveat.

NATHAN GONZALES: How the economy is doing is less important than how voters think the economy is doing.

HORSLEY: Nathan Gonzales who edits the Rothenberg-Gonzales Political Report says just as Republicans may have overplayed the message of gloom and doom at their convention last month, Democrats have to be careful not to pop the economic champagne corks too quickly.

GONZALES: Democrats, I think, have to walk the line between promoting positive jobs numbers and economic data that’s out there, but still understanding that there is a segment of the American people who don’t believe that the economy is working for them.

HORSLEY: Those are the voters Donald Trump’s been targeting. Trump is set to deliver an economic speech in Detroit on Monday, and today he announced the members of his economic advisory council. One of those members UC, Irvine Professor Peter Navarro says buried beneath the jobs number is a tangle of discouraging economic data, including a growing trade deficit.

PETER NAVARRO: We’re strumbling (ph) along. We’re probably stronger than the rest of the world at this point because we’re a – such a great nation. But it’s far from good enough. We’re vastly underperforming, and at the end of the day the problem all gets down to bad trade deals.

HORSLEY: The Trump campaign has also been highlighting figures showing lackluster economic growth in recent months of just 1.2 percent. White House economist Jason Furman argues the underlying growth rate is stronger than that. He notes consumer spending during the three-month period was up more than 4 percent.

JASON FURMAN: And when people are nervous, they hold back their spending. That’s not what we’re seeing now. We’re not seeing nervous consumers. We’re actually seeing consumers that are optimistic, that are positive, that are out there spending money because they are making more money and believe that their future is strong.

HORSLEY: Voters have a few more months to consider how they feel about the economy, and the candidates’ competing economic prescriptions before they decide how one important job gets filled. Scott Horsley, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Massachusetts Joins State-Led Efforts On Equal Pay For Women

Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker signs a pay equity act into law at the Massachusetts State House on Monday in Boston.

Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker signs a pay equity act into law at the Massachusetts State House on Monday in Boston. Elise Amendola/AP hide caption

toggle caption Elise Amendola/AP

Employers in Massachusetts will be barred from forcing prospective employees to divulge how much they were making at their last job. The change, effective in 2018, is part of a sweeping new equal pay measure Republican Gov. Charlie Baker signed into law on Aug. 1.

The law’s goal is to prevent women from being stuck in a cycle of low salaries.

“What happens to people over time is if, in that first negotiation — or those first few jobs out of high school or college — you are underpaid, then you really get a snowball effect,” says Victoria Budson, who directs the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and who advocated for the new law.

“If each subsequent salary is really benchmarked to that, then what can happen is that type of usually implicit and occasionally explicit discrimination really then follows that person throughout their career,” she says.

Democratic state senator Pat Jehlen was the chief sponsor of the legislation. She says divulging a low salary may prevent someone from even getting the job in the first place.

“We heard about a woman who had had a phone interview for a job, did very well, and didn’t hang up at the end of the conference call,” Jehlen says. The woman “heard the other people saying: ‘She looked like an ideal candidate until we heard what she’s making now. She must not be as good as she looks,’ and they didn’t hire her.”

The law also protects employees from retribution if they talk openly about how much they’re paid. It’s already been illegal under federal law for more than 80 years for employers to impose “pay secrecy.” But according to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, about half of employees say talking about salary with coworkers “is either discouraged or prohibited and/or could lead to punishment.”

Advocates say that if employees talk with their coworkers about how much they’re paid, it’s easier to find out when there are discrepancies.

One business group opposed the new law: the Massachusetts High Technology Council. It objected to the presumption that any pay differential is the result of discrimination. The group declined to comment for this story.

But other business groups supported the law, based on a provision that could help companies.

For the first time in the U.S., companies will have new ways to defend against claims of wage discrimination. Under the new law, companies can defend themselves against lawsuits by showing they have taken a look at pay practices and taken steps to remedy disparities.

To Jehlen, that’s the most powerful part of the new law.

“I think most discrimination is not intentional,” the state senator says. “I think people are unaware of bias or of the causes of bias. And so if they perform a genuine self-assessment looking across the board at what different people are paid, and seeing if there [are] unintentional differentials, they can use that if somebody tries to bring a suit against them.”

Massachusetts is one of the pioneers in mandating equal pay, passing its first such law in 1945.

Now, it’s part of a national trend, says Vicki Shabo of the National Partnership for Women and Families.

“It’s actually the latest in a run of some pretty strong pay-equity laws that have passed over the last year or so in California, in New York, recently in Maryland,” she says.

At a time when Congress has been unable to pass an equal pay bill, states are taking the lead.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)