Articles by admin

No Image

Cleveland Browns Are On The Verge Of A Winning Record

For fans of the NFL team, there’ve been some rough years. But finally, this weekend, the Browns go for their first winning record in 11 years.



DAVID GREENE, HOST:

Good morning. I’m David Greene. This song came out in 1998 to celebrate football returning to Cleveland. The Browns were back.

(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “HERE WE GO AGAIN”)

THE BROWNS ALL-STAR BAND: (Singing) The Browns are going to show you how the game is played. Here we go again.

GREENE: There have been some rough years. But finally this weekend, the Browns will go for their first winning record in 11 years. Now, I need the Browns to win. If they beat Baltimore, my Steelers can make the playoffs. But this isn’t about Pittsburgh. I just want Cleveland to be happy. You’re listening to MORNING EDITION.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Safely Evacuating The Elderly In Any Emergency Takes Planning And Practice

Jay McAbee, a bus driver with the Greenville, S.C., school district, waits by his bus in Charleston, S.C., in October of 2016, for word of when to start evacuating the city’s residents in advance of Hurricane Matthew. Simply having enough buses to carry pets as well as people can be key to convincing residents they need to leave ahead of a big storm, emergency responders say.

Mic Smith/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mic Smith/AP

The benefits of retiring in South Carolina’s low country are clear to Joyce East. Her home, sandwiched between the Atlantic Ocean and downtown Charleston, overlooks 120 acres of lush marshland. Palm trees and Spanish moss dot the property.

But the drawbacks of retiring only a few meters above sea level have also become apparent to the 91-one-year-old retiree. Since 2016, her home within Charleston’s Bishop Gadsden Retirement Community has weathered one snow storm, one ice storm and three hurricanes. She has had to evacuate twice in two years.

For East, these evacuations are just the cost of growing old on the coast. Three decades ago, East and her husband decided they wanted to retire somewhere warm on the waterfront. Four days after arriving in Charleston, the couple was forced to flee inland as Hurricane Hugo ravaged the coast. East would evacuate again for Hurricane Matthew in 2016, and once more for Hurricane Florence this past September.

Joyce East (right) with fellow Bishop Gadsden resident Sarah Darwin during their evacuation from their community on the South Carolina coast in September 2018.

Courtesy of Bishop Gadsen


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Bishop Gadsen

“Now that we’ve done it this much, it’s more of a routine,” says East. She packs her belongings in a navy evacuation suitcase with her name printed on it in white lettering. “I have to kind of look at it as a mini-vacation now.”

As unpredictable weather starts to feel inevitable, staff at Bishop Gadsden have worked to make evacuations feel as routine to residents as Monday night’s pub trivia. This year’s personalized suitcases were a new touch.

“Our planning is 24/7, 12 months a year,” says Kimberly Borts, one of the staff members charged with ensuring Bishop Gadsden is ready to depart come hurricane season. “This isn’t just let’s get on a bus and go.”

When Governor Henry McMaster mandated residents evacuate in the lead up to Hurricane Florence, he set in motion a sequence of events staff had spent the year fine-tuning. Ambulances arrived at 2 a.m. to whisk away the 14 seniors too frail to make the journey upright. The remaining 111 residents boarded buses bound for a mountaintop inn. A U-Haul was loaded up with walkers and a bus carted off residents’ pets.

It’s high stakes logistics. Any hiccup — too few oxygen tanks, lost medication — would have been disastrous. But even a well-executed journey carries risks for Bishop Gadsden’s retirees, many of whom are accustomed to a regimented routine.

“When that schedule is altered, that’s when you begin to have some challenges,” says Borts. During this year’s departure, she saw anxious residents who traditionally require one oxygen tank per day go through two tanks or more. As the seniors made their journey inland, Borts noted more upset stomachs and more bathroom trips.

Immediately after they returned from the shelter, Borts says staff began plotting how to make the journey smoother for their seniors — next year.

“We would sort of say to our fellow staff members, ‘Well, next time we do this,’ or ‘Next year we need to do X,Y, Z,’ ” she recalls.

Statistics show there will be a next time. Far beyond the marshy coast of Charleston, emergency evacuations are starting to seem commonplace.

Susan Burns monitors evacuations for Sedgwick, a company that deals with insurance claims for senior-living communities across the U.S.

After nursing home owners made the fatal decision not to evacuate residents in advance of Hurricane Katrina, Sedgwick began offering to reimburse facilities for part of their evacuation costs. But, until recently, no facility had taken the company up on the offer.

“I had not seen this coverage triggered at all until last year,” says Burns. She traces the uptick in recent claims to the “amazing number of natural disasters back to back” that have ravaged states like Florida, California and Missouri.

“They’re just trying to recover some of the costs and lessen the financial blow,” she says. This year, Bishop Gadsden spent $350,000 on shelter and transportation. The facility had shelled out a similar amount in 2016 for Hurricane Matthew.

And they’re prepared to do it again.

“You take care of a residents during good times and bad times,” says Borts. “The most important thing we can do is plan to do this again.”

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service of the Kaiser Family Foundation. Rebecca Ellis is a Kroc Fellow at NPR.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Solo: A Star Wars Story' VFX Breakdown, 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' Lego Set and More

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

FX Breakdown of the Day:

Effects artists at Industrial Light & Magic break down their digital creation of the Millennium Falcon for Solo: A Star Wars Story:

FX Easter eggs of the day:

Speaking of digital effects, here’s Vulture with a look at some secret CGI work in movies such as Justice League and Brokeback Mountain:

Cosplay of the Day:

Speaking of DC movies, Aquaman may be ruling the box office lately but this Wonder Woman fan is ruling cosplay:

After a lot of hard work and dedication here is my cosplay of Wonder Woman. I hope you @GalGadot and @PattyJenks notice, as they are a true inspiration to me & to many women/men. Photographer…
Read More


No Image

U.S. Stocks Come Back After Steep Losses During The Day

Specialist Stephen Naughton works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday.

Richard Drew/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Richard Drew/AP

U.S. market volatility continued on Thursday when markets managed to close up after sharp drops throughout the day, just one trading session after a record-setting rally pushed the Dow Jones Industrial Average up by more than 1,000 points — its largest single-day point gain ever.

After spending much of the day in steeply negative territory, the Dow and S&P 500 made a comeback.

The Dow closed up nearly 260 points, a little more than 1 percent. The swing from its low point to its closing level was more than 870 points.

The S&P 500 closed up a little less than 1 percent, up about 20 points. At its lowest, the index was down nearly 3 percent.

The Nasdaq also closed up, about one-half of 1 percent. At its lowest, the index was also down nearly 3 percent.

Year to date, the Dow is down about 6.5 percent, the S&P 500 a bit more. The Nasdaq has fared a little better, with a loss of 4.6 percent on the year.

All three major indexes have closed down four out of the last six trading sessions. Markets have seen great turbulence in the past few weeks amid U.S.- China trade tensions, new signs of a softening in the global economy and a fourth interest rate hike from the Federal Reserve this year. Car and home sales have slumped while the 30-year mortgage rate hit a seven-year high in November.

Once again, the market is weighing conflicting signals. On the plus side, consumers did not hold back this holiday season. U.S. retail sales were up 5.1 percent over last year, according to a Mastercard SpendingPulse report.

But that didn’t stop the volatility. A report released Thursday morning from the Conference Board showed consumer confidence slid to its lowest point in five months.

“Expectations regarding job prospects and business conditions weakened, but still suggest that the economy will continue expanding at a solid pace in the short-term,” Lynn Franco, a senior director at the board, said.

“While consumers are ending 2018 on a strong note, back-to-back declines … are reflective of an increasing concern that the pace of economic growth will begin moderating in the first half of 2019,” Franco said.

On Wednesday, the Dow surged 1,086 points — nearly 5 percent — allowing investors to regain some of the steep losses suffered in recent trading sessions.

The broader market also did well on Wednesday, as measured by the S&P 500. It was also up nearly 5 percent.

Markets managed to hold a big chunk of those gains on Thursday, as investors refocused on the many market challenges as the clock runs out on 2018.

The markets have two more trading days left in the year.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'WSJ' Report: Psychiatric Hospitals With Safety Violations Remain Accredited

NPR’s Ari Shapiro talks to Wall Street Journal reporter Stephanie Armour about her investigation of how many psychiatric hospitals with troubling safety records continue to receive accreditation.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

At a psychiatric hospital in Atlanta, a 19-year-old patient died while being restrained by staff. It was deemed a homicide. At a similar facility in Dallas, a patient attacked a doctor who later died of his injuries. These psychiatric hospitals and more than a hundred others around the U.S. stayed fully accredited even after cases of patient abuse, sexual assault and other major violations. That’s the finding of an investigation by The Wall Street Journal, and reporter Stephanie Armour joins us now. Welcome.

STEPHANIE ARMOUR: Thanks for having me.

SHAPIRO: You looked at hundreds of pages of state inspection reports from psychiatric facilities all over the U.S. Tell us the pattern you found.

ARMOUR: Well, what I found with the analysis is that hospitals that have significant and serious violations were able, in many cases, to retain their full accreditation by a third-party accrediting organization. And what these hospitals then do is they use this accreditation – it comes with a gold seal of approval – on their websites, on brochures. And they use it to recruit new patients even at the same time that they are under federal investigation for these violations or even, in some cases, where the violations are so severe the federal government has cut them off from all Medicare funding.

SHAPIRO: Yeah. That was one of the things that really struck me in this story – is that in cases where the problems were so pervasive, the federal government said the hospital would no longer get Medicare money, still the hospital retained its accreditation.

ARMOUR: That’s correct. And we found examples where the hospital retained their accreditation even after they had lost all their Medicare funding. And you have to understand; for the federal government to cut off Medicare funding is a very, very rare occurrence because it generally means the hospital goes out of business. But what’s also really interesting about this is that the federal and state governments have largely farmed out safety oversight of psychiatric hospitals and actually all hospitals in the United States to these third-party accrediting organizations. They go in. They inspect a hospital. They certify the hospital, and that hospital is then able to get Medicare funding.

SHAPIRO: You write that one organization has a virtual monopoly on these inspections of psychiatric hospitals. It’s called the Joint Commission. They decide whether a hospital gets accredited or not. When you showed them your findings, how did they explain their decision to let hospitals keep accreditation even after these egregious lapses?

ARMOUR: Well, they say that their role is very much to work with a hospital that has problems to help them improve, that they are not a, quote, “regulator,” that they do not go in and punish a hospital. And they actually say that this process that they have allows hospitals to be much more forthcoming with them about potential problems.

SHAPIRO: Do you find that a reasonable explanation?

ARMOUR: Well, we did find that hospitals that – the Joint Commission said, look; hospitals tend to get better after a violation when they retain their accreditation. But we found in our analysis that the vast majority of hospitals actually went on to have further violations.

SHAPIRO: So if there’s more than a hundred psychiatric hospitals around the U.S. that have had egregious violations and yet still advertise this gold seal of approval, what does that mean for people who might be considering placing a loved one or themselves into a psychiatric hospital? What kind of guarantee can people have of safety?

ARMOUR: There is, I think, a concern that there’s a false sense of safety that hospitals are able to promote and advertise. You have to also understand that the Joint Commission, which inspects and reviews hospitals often in lieu of regular state inspections – all of their surveys and inspections are private, where – if a state survey is done, in most cases, someone who’s considering a hospital can go check it out to see what the problems have been. But the Joint Commission – thanks to a federal law, all of their inspections are private. So there’s very little information really that patients can get on what may be going on at a hospital.

SHAPIRO: Stephanie Armour is a health policy reporter for The Wall Street Journal. Thanks for joining us today.

ARMOUR: Sure. Thank you for having me.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Adults Come Under Scrutiny After HS Wrestler Told To Cut His Dreadlocks Or Forfeit

A video still shows Buena Regional High School wrestler Andrew Johnson getting his hair cut on Dec. 19, in Buena, N.J., after referee Alan Maloney told Johnson he would forfeit the match if he did not have his dreadlocks cut.

Michael Frankel/SNJToday.com via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Michael Frankel/SNJToday.com via AP

A week after a white referee told a black high school wrestler that he needed to cut off his dreadlocks or forfeit a match, the referee has been suspended. But people in town — and on social media — are asking why other adults didn’t do more to prevent what happened: A school official cut the student’s hair as the crowd watched and the clock ticked down.

In a video that has been viewed millions of times, Buena Regional High School junior Andrew Johnson is seen having his hair cut by the team trainer. Johnson won the match in overtime. But as the referee, Alan Maloney, raised Johnson’s hand as the winner, the young man looks utterly miserable.

Epitome of a team player ??

A referee wouldn’t allow Andrew Johnson of Buena @brhschiefs to wrestle with a cover over his dreadlocks. It was either an impromptu haircut, or a forfeit. Johnson chose the haircut, then won by sudden victory in OT to help spark Buena to a win. pic.twitter.com/f6JidKNKoI

— Mike Frankel (@MikeFrankelSNJ) December 20, 2018

A local sports reporter tweeted video of the incident, and outrage followed.

“This is not about hair. This is about race,” tweeted the ACLU of New Jersey. “How many different ways will people try to exclude Black people from public life without having to declare their bigotry? We’re so sorry this happened to you, Andrew. This was discrimination, and it’s not okay.”

The New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association said in a statement that it had suspended Maloney while the incident is investigated by the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights.

Athletic association Executive Director Larry White said the incident had hit close to home: “[A]s an African-American and parent — as well as a former educator, coach, official and athlete — I clearly understand the issues at play, and probably better than most. The NJSIAA takes this matter very seriously, and I ask that everyone respect the investigatory process related to all parties involved.”

It turns out that it’s not the first time that Maloney has been investigated on charges of racist conduct. At a party in 2016, he allegedly called a black referee the N-word. Maloney told the South Jersey Courier-Post that he didn’t remember using the slur, but he believed the accounts of witnesses who said he did. The New Jersey Wrestling Officials Association initially decreed that Maloney would be suspended for a year, but he filed an appeal. The association’s ethics committee overturned the suspension, ruling that it didn’t have jurisdiction.

Johnson’s family released a statement through its attorney, Dominic Speziali, that offered a more detailed accounting of what it says happened at the Dec. 19 match. Referee Maloney was reportedly late to the meet and missed weigh-ins when “scholastic wrestling rules clearly state that referees are to inspect wrestlers’ appearance and determine any rules violations prior to the start of the meet, typically during weigh-ins. … When he did evaluate Andrew, he failed to raise any issues with the length of his hair or the need to wear a head covering.”

Maloney rejected the covering that Johnson wore over his hair, and then started the clock, giving the wrestler 90 seconds to cut his hair or forfeit the match. The family says, “Under duress but without any influence from the coaching staff or the athletic trainer, Andrew decided to have his hair cut rather than forfeit the match.”

The family added that it is supportive of Buena’s coaches and trainer: “The blame here rests primarily with the referee and those that permitted him to continue in that role despite clear evidence of what should be a disqualifying race-related transgression.”

Buena’s school superintendent released a statement outlining the incident and pledged continued support for its student-athletes. The Buena Regional Board of Education convened an emergency meeting on Wednesday evening, and as WHYY’s Darryl Murphy reports, it served as an occasion for community members to voice their displeasure:

“Rajhon White, a Buena alum, said the fact that the adults in the gym let that haircut happen reflects a larger problem with the culture of the community.

” ‘It was a direct correlation of what happens. It was Andrew being put in a situation where no one is standing up and fighting for him. You seen the video,’ he said. ‘Everyone is sitting there like, “Hmm, this is happening,” and that is exactly what is happening in these hallways.’

” ‘It’s not surprising,’ said Alison Arne of Buena Vista. ‘It was shocking to see Andrew Johnson’s hair being cut, but it definitely was not shocking that it was allowed to happen.’ “

The state’s department of education tweeted that it had met with the NJSIAA on Thursday morning “about protecting the rights of all student-athletes across New Jersey.”

The episode brought Johnson tweets of support from Olympic gold-medal-winning wrestler Jordan Burroughs and film director Ava DuVernay, among others.

“I don’t just wear locs. They are a part of me. A gift to me. They mean something to me,” DuVernay wrote. “So to watch this young man’s ordeal, wrecked me.”

Burroughs called the incident “sickening.”

“I’ve been wrestling for 25 years, at every level, and I have never once seen a person required to cut their hair during a match,” he wrote. “My opinion is that this was a combination of an abuse of power, racism, and just plain negligence. As heroic as it was for Andrew to step up in the midst of what was happening, it shouldn’t have got that far. The parents and coaches of the Buena wrestling team should have intervened. This young man should have been protected in this moment. I’m sure his hair was a strong part of his identity, and no single victory is worth succumbing to the pressure of unjust oppression and the unwarranted stripping of that identity.”

Johnson’s parents said the family had been moved by the outpouring of support, and that wrestling has taught their son resilience against adversity.

“As we move forward, we are comforted by both the strength of Andrew’s character and the support he’s received from the community,” they wrote. “We will do all that we can to make sure that no student-athlete is forced to endure what Andrew experienced.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'Washington Post' Sports Reporter Will Cover The 2020 Presidential Campaign

Washington Post reporter Chelsea Janes is switching from the Washington Nationals beat to the 2020 presidential campaign and discusses the differences and similarities of covering politics and sports.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

Back on Election Day last month, Washington Post reporter Chelsea Janes had a big scoop. Now, if you’re thinking, Election Day – must be politics – think again. Janes covers baseball for the Post. And her scoop was that the Washington Nationals had just offered right-fielder Bryce Harper the biggest free-agent contract in U.S. sports history.

Janes has been all over breaking news on the Nats for four years now, which is why it caught our eye when we spotted a press release announcing she is about to switch beats to cover the 2020 presidential campaign. Chelsea Janes joins us now in our studio. Welcome.

CHELSEA JANES: Thank you for having me.

KELLY: So baseball to a presidential election – how did this come about?

JANES: (Laughter) You know, every four or five years or so they try to rotate the baseball reporters off that beat. It’s pretty grueling, as I’m sure a presidential campaign is too. But…

KELLY: I was going to say.

JANES: Yeah, (laughter) right.

KELLY: I’m not sure it’s going to be (laughter) – it’s going to get easier.

JANES: So I kind of knew my time was up. That was my fourth year. And as we started talking about what was next, they kind of said, well, how about Iowa in 2019? And I laughed it off. And eventually, it sort of started, well, actually, that would be really neat. And they were open to it, they being the head editors. And I was open to it. Just kind of felt like a no-brainer.

KELLY: Had you closely tracked politics up till that moment?

JANES: I would say I was one of the people – I think there are many – who really, you know, followed but really kind of got sucked in a couple years ago when the whole country kind of got sucked in a little bit more. And…

KELLY: It’s been hard not to be following politics closely.

JANES: Yeah, exactly.

KELLY: Yeah.

JANES: Exactly. And I think, you know, being so close to everything that’s happening in Washington and being at the Washington Post as that was happening, it was like, wow, I’m feet away from sort of being in on this period in history that I’m sure people will never forget. So you know, I figured if journalism is the first draft of history, I want to write part of it. You know, I want to be there for it. So it was an unbelievable opportunity that they were willing to even let me think about it.

KELLY: Part of what you’ll bring to it that somebody who’s been doing this for 20, 30 years can’t is a totally fresh eye. I mean, you weren’t working this beat in 2016, 2017.

JANES: Yeah. It’s really interesting. As they sort of presented this to me as an option, I think one of the things that’s very evident as I’ve talked to people is how much they thought they knew during 2016 and how little they really knew. So you know, a couple people have said to me, we need someone who can ask the dumb questions. And I was like, I can do that. That’s something I am capable of.

KELLY: (Laughter).

JANES: But yeah, I think they – there’s a sense that the rules have changed. And hopefully, you know, maybe I’ll notice something that someone who’s kind of in the weeds with it all doesn’t, or I can supplement in that way. So I at least hope that’ll be an advantage.

KELLY: Talk to me about some of the skills that you learned covering the baseball beat that will translate. You mentioned Iowa.

JANES: (Laughter).

KELLY: So I’m guessing a fondness for long bus rides and bad motels along the way might come in handy.

JANES: (Laughter) Yeah. Yeah, I think the travel logistics is a big part of it, that, you know, my stamina is very high. I’ve basically lived out of suitcases for five years, so I – I’m used to it. And, you know, that’s a big part of the campaign trail, from what I’ve heard. And having not been there, I can’t say.

But, you know, there’s a lot of sort of incremental updates. There’s a lot of noticing small changes in what people say and figuring out why. And I think that’s similar to baseball. It’s like, you might – you know, someone who’s just kind of dropping in might not see why this day or change is important, but it is important in presenting that day to day.

KELLY: What will you miss about covering baseball?

JANES: I love baseball, so even just kind of being at the park. It’s something I grew up with. I played softball in college. It’s brought me a lot of my closest friends. I’ll miss that part of it. I’ll miss the people. You spend – you know, as I’m sure you do in the politics realm – a lot of time with people that you cover and that you cover people with.

But, you know, I won’t miss rain delays, and I won’t miss writing about little injuries (laughter) while the world is burning. You know, you kind of sit there and think, what am I writing about a hamstring for?

KELLY: It’ll be awfully nice, though, to get to show up at one of those first spring games and think, I can just watch this.

JANES: (Laughter) Yeah.

KELLY: I don’t have to file a single line of copy about it.

JANES: Exactly. It’ll be nice – and leave when I want. (Laughter) Yeah.

KELLY: Well, Chelsea Janes, we wish you luck.

JANES: Thank you. I appreciate it.

KELLY: That’s Chelsea Janes. She wraps up four years covering baseball on the sports desk of the Washington Post in January in order to dig in covering politics and the 2020 presidential campaign.

(SOUNDBITE OF QUANTIC’S “PAINTING SILHOUETTES”)

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Insured, But Indebted: Couple Works 5 Jobs To Pay Off Medical Bills

Robert and Tiffany Cano of San Tan Valley, Ariz., have a new marriage, a new house and a 10-month-old son, Brody. Since Brody was born, the Canos have racked up nearly $12,000 in medical debt.

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News

Robert and Tiffany Cano of San Tan Valley, Ariz., have a new marriage, a new house and a 10-month-old son, Brody, who is delighted by his ability to blow raspberries.

They also have a stack of medical bills that threatens to undermine it all.

In the months since their sturdy, brown-eyed boy was born, the Canos have acquired nearly $12,000 in medical debt — so much that they need a spreadsheet to track what they owe to hospitals and doctors.

“I’m on these payment arrangements that are killing us,” said Tiffany Cano, 37, who has spent her lunch hours from her job at a regional bank on the phone negotiating payoff plans that now total $700 a month. “My husband is working four jobs. I work full time. We’re a hardworking family doing our best and not getting anywhere.”

The pair, who earn nearly $100,000 a year, are insured and have had no major illnesses or injuries. Still, the Canos are among the 1 in 4 Americans who report in multiple polls that the high cost of health care is the biggest concern facing their families. And they’re at risk of filing for bankruptcy; 62 percent of people who file do so, in part, because of medical bills.

“Oh, yes, that worry is always in the back of my mind,” Tiffany said.

The family is part of a struggling group: Middle-class folks who have followed the rules and paid for employer-based medical insurance, only to find that soaring health care costs — combined with high deductibles, high copayments and surprise medical bills — leave them vulnerable.

“I thought we’d be covered, and it’s just not enough coverage at all,” she said.

Robert Cano, also 37, had family health insurance for 2018 through his job as a manager at a large chain retail store, for which he pays nearly $500 per month. The plan’s $3,000 annual deductible and 40 percent coinsurance fees have added up faster than the Canos anticipated.

First came the nearly $4,000 bill from the in-network hospital where Brody was born Jan. 2, followed by separate fees from the anesthesiologist and the doctor who performed the routine delivery. Then, at 2 months, Brody was hospitalized with breathing problems that doctors said could be related to allergies or asthma. In May, Tiffany came down with a stomach virus that sent her to the emergency room for drugs to treat nausea and dehydration. Last month, the baby developed a bad case of bacterial conjunctivitis, or pinkeye.

“It’s been, like, $300 here, $700 there,” said Tiffany. “We had a hospital bill for him being sick of, like, $1,800.” Unable initially to find a pediatrician she liked, Tiffany has agonized over whether to use the ER when Brody gets sick. When he had pinkeye, she debated whether to take him in, hoping it would get better on its own.

Then he got worse, she said, pulling up a photo on her phone of her son with half-moons of red, puffy flesh under his dark eyes.

“I let him suffer for a day like that,” she said.

The Canos lost their first child, a girl, midway through her pregnancy in 2016. Tiffany acknowledges that experience has left her more anxious than the average first-time mom.

“It gave me so much fear that something would happen to him,” she said.

As for their own health care needs, the couple put themselves lower on the priority list. Tiffany has used a prosthetic limb since childhood, when her lower left leg was amputated because of a birth defect.

She needs a new prosthesis because her body changed during pregnancy, but she can’t see how to afford it.

A model suitable for the busy life of a working mom would easily cost $10,000 to $15,000, according to Tom Fise, executive director of the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association.

“We’re a hardworking family doing our best and not getting anywhere,” said Tiffany Cano, with tears in her eyes.

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News

“I try to push through,” Tiffany said. “I put on that brave face of just walking, but it’s so painful to walk. I have bruises all over my leg. I get blisters all the time.” Lately, she has been wearing an old prosthesis, one she used in high school, because it’s a little bit more comfortable.

The Canos don’t know how exactly they fell into such debt, because they tried hard to make responsible decisions. After meeting three years ago, they knew quickly that they wanted to marry and have a family.

“I waited until I found the right guy,” said Tiffany, who was thrilled when, in 2016, they were able to afford a 2,500-square-foot, two-story home in one of the stucco-and-tile neighborhoods an hour outside Phoenix.

But, taken together, the medical payment plans and premiums are almost as much as their $1,300 monthly mortgage. All told, the Canos spend about 15 percent of their annual income on health care, almost three times the average for non-Medicare households in the U.S.

That leaves too little for day care, car payments, gas, food and dozens of other domestic expenses, Tiffany said.

For 17 years, Robert had comprehensive health insurance through his job as a soldier in the Army Reserve and paid little or nothing for medical care. He left the Army in 2017, however, after he learned he would be deployed for an extended time away from his wife and new son.

“I told them, ‘I have to be at home,’ ” he recalled. The Army insurance ended on Dec. 31, two days before Brody was born.

That meant moving to his employer’s insurance plan. Like more than 40 percent of 152 million Americans who get health insurance through work, the Canos are enrolled in a plan that demands thousands of dollars before any coverage kicks in.

The couple discovered that they earn too much to qualify for financial assistance from medical providers or for subsidies if they shifted their insurance to a plan under the federal health insurance exchange. She is a full-time bank compliance officer. He is a full-time store manager.

Tiffany wrote to Kaiser Health News after seeing stories about sky-high medical bills on TV.

Dr. Merrit Quarum, the chief executive of WellRithms, a health care consulting firm, reviewed the family’s medical bills and the responses from their health care providers.

Though Quarum had questions about some of the fees in the itemized bills — $4 for a 600-milligram ibuprofen tablet? $3,125 to place an epidural? — he found the charges were legitimate under the terms of the contract between the hospital and the Canos’ insurer.

Tiffany’s only recourse was to set up the five payment plans she navigates each month.

“I wish I could say it wasn’t so, but it is,” Quarum said.

Robert Cano works up to 120 hours a week, mostly to cover the extra costs of his family’s health care. Besides a retail job, he works as a substitute teacher, a nighttime security guard and as a sandwich deliveryman.

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

Heidi de Marco/Kaiser Health News

Mostly to pay off that health care debt, Robert has taken several part-time gigs this year — as a substitute teacher, a nighttime security guard and a sandwich deliveryman for a fast-food chain in Scottsdale, 40 miles away, where tips are better. He said he sometimes works up to 120 hours in a week.

“I’m not ashamed or embarrassed, even as old as I am, to deliver sandwiches,” he said, pulling on his retail chain polo shirt before rushing to a Saturday morning shift. “I know people, they’d rather get food stamps and feel sorry for themselves. But I’m a fighter. I will not give up … If I can bring in an extra $400 a week or $800 a month, she can get what she needs for the baby.”

Often home after midnight, he keeps shampoo and shaving cream in his car and naps in parking lots between jobs, relying on Red Bull to stay alert.

That means on many nights, when Tiffany picks up Brody from day care after her 90-minute commute, she handles most of the chores at home.

“Sometimes I feel like a single mom because my husband is never around,” she said.

She carefully tracks the family’s medical expenses, trying to juggle them with ordinary outlays that can’t wait — like $500 for the brakes that went out on her car this month.

At the rate they’re going, the bills won’t be paid until Brody is 3, Tiffany said. The Canos are getting older and they would like to have another baby before it’s too late, but, for now, that seems impossible.

For 2019, the couple have decided to switch to a different plan offered through Tiffany’s employer. The premium is higher — $650 a month — but the deductible is $1,500 with just 10 percent coinsurance.

“It is going to be a lot more per paycheck, which is going to hurt us,” Tiffany said. “But after what just happened, I want to make sure we are prepared in case anything does occur.”

How to fix a health care system that burdens middle-class families so heavily is beyond her, she said.

“The only thing we can do is just keep working,” Tiffany said. “I always wonder: How does everybody else do it?”

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)