Articles by admin

No Image

Apple's Cook Takes Rivals To Task Over Data Privacy

3:31

Download

Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks in New York on April 30. This week, he said some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent companies have “built their businesses by lulling their customers into complacency about their personal information.” Richard Drew/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Richard Drew/AP

Apple CEO Tim Cook made headlines this week when he lashed out at rival tech companies for selling people’s personal data. He didn’t mention Google, Facebook or Twitter by name, but it’s pretty clear those were the companies he meant. But is Apple faultless on privacy issues?

Cook’s been beating the drum on the issue for a while. Last fall he told PBS’s Charlie Rose, “When we (Apple) design a new service we try not to collect data,” Cook said. “So we’re not reading your email. We’re not reading your iMessage. If the government laid a subpoena on us to get your iMessages we can’t provide it.”

At a cybersecurity summit this fall he made a similar point in front of an audience that included President Obama.

Some groups are applauding Cook for speaking out. The Electronic Privacy Information Center honored Cook at its annual “Champions of Freedom” event in Washington, D.C.

“It is a recognition that he has spoken out about the importance of protecting privacy for consumers,” says EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg. “And he spoke out in support of protecting a value that many people today are justifiably concerned is at grave risk.”

Recent events sure make it look that way. Once your data is out there, hackers don’t seem to have much trouble getting their hands on it.

At the EPIC Awards ceremony, Cook told the audience that some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent companies have “built their businesses by lulling their customers into complacency about their personal information.”

But, it’s easier for Apple to take this position. Most of its profits come from selling devices. Google, Twitter and Facebook sell ad-supported services. You get them largely for free because you’re willing to watch ads.

Take Google’s Gmail. “Google has made a decision to use a form of encryption that basically breaks the communication in the middle,” says EPIC’s Rotenberg, “and allows them to see what you’ve said and determine whether there’s some advertising value in your text that they can then sell to an advertiser and profit from your email.”

Neither Google nor Facebook would talk on the record. But Mike Zaneis, general counsel for the Interactive Advertising Bureau, says these companies don’t sell your name to advertisers, just your profile of interests. And Apple products are expensive. Ads make products accessible to people of all incomes.

“They wouldn’t be able to afford it if they had to pay out of pocket, but because it’s all supported by advertising that’s a wonderful tradeoff for them and one that they eagerly engage in,” Zaneis says.

And it’s not like Apple is 100 percent pure. “They do still ultimately collect lots and lots and lots of data,” says Fatemeh Khatibloo, an analyst at Forrester Research.

Though Khatibloo says Apple does do more to protect the data even with ad driven products like iTunes Radio. But, it doesn’t do much about companies, like Uber, that have apps on its mobile devices.

“Even if you’re not running the app, they’re collecting your location information. And even if you turn off location tracking services they can still sort of triangulate where you are based on IP address,” Khatibloo says.

And on Monday, Apple is expected to reveal a streaming music service; chances are at least part of it will be ad supported.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Teens Hoping For More Jobs, Higher Wages This Summer

José Moncada, 16, signed up for a summer youth employment program in New York City. He said hopes to earn enough to help his family, which lives on less than $30,000 a year.

José Moncada, 16, signed up for a summer youth employment program in New York City. He said hopes to earn enough to help his family, which lives on less than $30,000 a year. Kaomi Goetz/NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Kaomi Goetz/NPR

Recipe for a good summer-job market: First, hire a lot of people in May. Second, give workers raises, and third, push down gasoline prices. Mix it all together — and pour out hope for teen workers.

“Having a job makes me feel really excited. I can put my own money in my pocket instead of asking my parents for money all the time,” said José Moncada, a 16-year-old job seeker in New York City.

Moncada and other teens may have caught a break Friday when the economy followed that seasonal employment recipe precisely.

The Labor Department said employers added 280,000 new jobs in May, exceeding economists’ expectations. May brought a burst of hiring in leisure and hospitality, with 57,000 new jobs. Retailers added 31,400 jobs.

Typically, those are the sectors that hire a lot of younger workers. And those are the sectors that benefit when workers have more cash to spend. The May jobs report showed average hourly earnings rose by 0.3 percent — which translates to an annual growth rate of nearly 4 percent, far exceeding inflation.

Here’s another factor that may encourage summer hiring:

On Friday, OPEC announced it will keep oil production unchanged this year, even though supplies are plentiful. That helped lower the U.S. benchmark price to less than $58 a barrel, down from around $106 at this time last year.

AAA, the auto club, is predicting gasoline prices will fall this summer. The average national price of a gallon is $2.75, way down from $3.66 last year at this time. “This could be the year of the summer road trip,” AAA spokeswoman Avery Ash said.

That’s all positive for young workers. “Seasonal hiring is expected to take a nice jump this summer,” according to a report from CareerBuilder, an online jobs site.

Based on a Harris survey of more than 2,000 hiring managers, the company concluded that 36 percent of private-sector employers will be hiring summer workers, up from 30 percent last year and an average of 21 percent from 2008-2011.

“Many summer jobs went away completely during the recession as companies eliminated internship programs and as households cut back on vacation and recreation spending,” CareerBuilder CEO Matt Ferguson said in a statement.

Not only did many summer jobs disappear during the Great Recession, but competition increased for those that remained, according to professor Ruth Milkman, a labor expert at the City University of New York.

“It used to be that minimum-wage jobs were mostly for very young people, either teenagers or people just entering the labor market permanently,” Milkman said. “What’s happened with the deterioration of the wage structure in recent decades is that more and more working adults are in minimum wage jobs.”

All of that competition has discouraged many teens from even looking for work. As recently as 2000, 52 percent of teenagers were in the labor force. Today, it’s down to less than a third.

So here’s where things stand heading into summer: The national unemployment rate is 5.5 percent, but for workers ages 16-19, it’s 17.9 percent. That’s much lower than the 27.2 percent peak most recently hit in 2010, but it’s still painfully high.

And there’s a big unknown in this summer’s labor market. While the demand for workers has been growing, so have wages. At least 29 states and many cities have passed laws raising the minimum wage well above the federal minimum of $7.25 an hour. Many private employers, such as Wal-Mart, McDonald’s and Target, have raised their wage floors to well above the federal minimum.

These wage increases will disproportionately affect young workers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says more than half of all minimum-wage workers are 24 or younger.

So teens who do land jobs may make more money, which they could then spend at malls and restaurants and amusement parks. But their higher wages could dampen hiring.

Whether the bigger paychecks for young people will translate into a better economy — or just less hiring — remains to be seen.

For now, Moncada, the job seeker at the Henry Street Settlement on Manhattan’s Lower East Side, just wants to get working. Last summer, he cleaned streets at the state minimum of $8.75 an hour. He wants the same gig this summer.

He said his family of six lives on less than $30,000 a year, so he needs money for his school uniform and sneakers. Also, “I go to the store to get food that we need for the house,” he said.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Why Wal-Mart's Labor Issues Run Deeper Than Too Much Justin Bieber

Wal-Mart employee Dayngel Fernandez stocks shelves in the produce department on February 19, 2015 in Miami, Fla. Activists say the company's recent corporate policy changes don't address systemic labor and environmental problems.

Wal-Mart employee Dayngel Fernandez stocks shelves in the produce department on February 19, 2015 in Miami, Fla. Activists say the company’s recent corporate policy changes don’t address systemic labor and environmental problems. Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Joe Raedle/Getty Images

On Wednesday, in advance of a Friday shareholder meeting, Wal-Mart executives told employees they’d turn up the heat and mix up the music in stores — after complaints that workers were chilly and subjected to endless repetition of Celine Dion and Justin Bieber songs.

“Taking care of our customers begins with taking care of you,” U.S. COO Judith McKenna said in a statement. “It’s that simple. My commitment to you is that we will continue to listen, and, more importantly, act on what we hear.”

Activists say they applaud the company’s efforts to improve working conditions for U.S. employees — policy changes that also include raising their pay to at least $9 per hour.

But a report out Thursday highlights a series of ways that Wal-Mart is neglecting commitments it has made to maintaining labor and environmental standards throughout its supply chain.

The report, published by the Food Chain Workers Alliance, highlights cases in
which suppliers have failed to uphold the company’s compliance standards and Wal-Mart has neglected to enforce its own standards and goals.

Ultimately, the report calls the company’s commitments to improving labor and environmental impacts “mostly a PR stunt.” Wal-Mart did not reply to The Salt’s request for comment.

Over the years, Wal-Mart has made a series of pledges that now fall under the umbrella of a “Responsible Sourcing” code of ethics. It requires suppliers to abide by standards including “labor protections, such as hours of work, pay, and health and safety, as well as environmental policies, such as complying with local and international laws and regulations and reducing pollutants and waste,” the report notes.

Many of these standards are already required by law. But the report finds that the company as a whole, and its suppliers, are falling short in many places.

For example, two investigations cited Wal-Mart as a major buyer of shrimp from farms known to use slavery and forced labor. And two of Wal-Mart’s major packaged lettuce producers, Taylor Farms and Ready Pac, have been repeatedly cited by OSHA for failing to protect laborers from injuries, thus violating Wal-Mart’s labor code of conduct. The same is true for some baked good suppliers.

On the environmental front, Wal-Mart announced in 2010 that it would
cut 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions out of its supply
chain by the end of 2015. As of March 2015, though, Walmart had reached only 38 percent of that goal, the report finds.

But Jose Oliva, co-director of the FCWA, says a perhaps even bigger problem is that the company isn’t transparent about its adherence to its code.

“There is absolutely no way of verifying their claims or of ensuring that the claims are systemic and creating the kinds of conditions, in terms of workplaces and environment, that we need for food to be healthy and procured without suffering,” Oliva tells The Salt.

What the company could do, he says, is hire a third-party verification entity to ensure that the code of ethics is being followed and implemented. “And Wal-Mart would have to abide by the recommendations that independent entity puts out,” he says.

Wal-Mart also set a goal of purchasing $1 billion worth of “local” food from area farmers by 2015. But, the report says, it’s not clear that the commitment is much more than “corporate greenwashing.”

Farmers “receive inconsistent prices for their produce, depending on whom they work with, and in some instances, when the person they work with leaves the company, their replacement is no longer interested in buying from a farmer or a cooperative,” according to the report.

Oliva says the FCWA’s research revealed that Wal-Mart needs to work harder to fulfill its local food goals so that the benefits to farmers are more just.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

California Women Can Soon Go Right To The Pharmacist For Birth Control

Amil Patel (left) and Bob Dunn run the front desk at this Walgreens pharmacy on the campus of the University of California, San Francisco. The store will be one of the first to take advantage of a new California law expanding pharmacists' scope of practice.

Amil Patel (left) and Bob Dunn run the front desk at this Walgreens pharmacy on the campus of the University of California, San Francisco. The store will be one of the first to take advantage of a new California law expanding pharmacists’ scope of practice. April Dembosky/KQED hide caption

itoggle caption April Dembosky/KQED

Think of how often you stop by Walgreens or CVS. You run in and grab some Band-Aids or restock your ibuprofen supply. Maybe you even get a flu shot on your way to work.

Soon, it will be that easy for women in California to get birth control, too. Under a new state law, women will be able to go to a pharmacy, get a prescription for contraceptive pills, the ring, or the patch, get it filled and walk out 15 minutes later.

“For a woman who can’t get in to see their doctor, the pharmacist will be able to furnish that for them now,” says Lisa Kroon, a professor at University of California, San Francisco’s school of pharmacy who oversees students who work at the Walgreens store on campus.

That pharmacy will be one of the first to take advantage of a new law in California allowing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. The law, SB 493, was passed in 2013. State health officials are now finalizing the regulations for the law to take effect. The California pharmacy board met Thursday to review them. The law is expected to be fully implemented later this year.

But the law goes beyond birth control pills. It also authorizes pharmacists to prescribe medications for smoking cessation and travel abroad. Pharmacists can administer routine vaccinations to children ages 3 and older. They can even order lab tests and adjust drug regimens for patients with diabetes, hypertension, or other conditions. Kroon says the idea is to make it easier on patients.

“Maybe a working parent can now come after work because the pharmacy is open later,” she says.

The law was passed amid growing concern about doctor shortages. As more baby boomers hit age 65, and millions of people get health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, there aren’t enough primary care doctors to go around.

Advocates says California is the first state to recognize that pharmacists can help fill the gap.

“The pharmacist is really an untapped resource,” Kroon says. “We are graduating students that are ready for this, but the laws just haven’t kept up with what the pharmacist training already is.”

But there’s a big drawback for pharmacists. Now they can perform all these services once reserved for the doctor’s office. But, they won’t get paid for the extra time it takes to provide them.

The law does not compel insurance companies or Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid, to reimburse these services, says Jon Roth, CEO of the California Pharmacists Association.

In the long run, Roth says the law could ultimately save money, because reimbursement rates for pharmacists will inevitably be lower than what doctors charge.

“We are working to try and identify where it makes sense to pay pharmacists as opposed to other more expensive providers in the health care delivery system,” he says.

Pharmacists’ growing power has some physicians bracing for a turf war. The California Medical Association opposed an early version of the law, citing patient safety concerns. It later withdrew its opposition after lawmakers added a special licensing procedure and continuing education requirement for pharmacists.

Still, some doctors are concerned that if women don’t come to the clinic for their birth control, they won’t get screened for cervical cancer or tested for sexually transmitted diseases.

“Family planning for women is often an access point to assessing other health issues,” says Amy Moy, vice president of public affairs for the California Family Health Council, an advocacy group that supports the law. “Women accessing birth control through the pharmacist would be faster and more convenient. But they will also not have the comprehensive care available in another health care setting.”

Studies of women living on the border of Texas and Mexico found that women who get their birth control over the counter in Mexican pharmacies are less likely to go to the doctor for other preventive care, compared with women who get contraception at clinics. But women at the clinics were also more likely to stop using their birth control, in part because of having to schedule a doctor’s visit to get it.

Moy’s group and other women’s advocates say the benefits of improving access to birth control and reducing unintended pregnancies are critical to women’s health and outweigh the potential risks.

Pharmacy professor Kroon says the plan is for pharmacists to communicate regularly with patients’ doctors. “We are not a lone ranger out there doing something,” she says.

If things go well with the pharmacists law, it could bode well for efforts to expand the scope of practice for other health care practioners. Sen. Ed Hernandez, who led the effort on the pharmacist law, has also proposed bills to increase authority for nurse practitioners and optometrists. Both are working their way through the legislature.

Other states are watching California to see how the pharmacist law plays out. Lawmakers in Oregon and in Congress are considering similar laws.

“They are all watching what happens in California,” Kroon says.

This story is part of a reporting partnership with NPR, KQED and Kaiser Health News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


Today in Movie Culture: Basketball In the Movies, 'San Andreas' Without Special Effects and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

In honor of the NBA finals, here’s a supercut of the best basketball dunks in movies:

This Jurassic Park print by Rich Kelly is part of Mondo’s “When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth” exhibit. See more at Business Insider.

See what San Andreas looks like without special effects:

Now watch what San Andreas gets right about West Coast fears of “The Big One”:

Velma and Scooby-Doo try to hurt their competition in this fun Ghostbusters art. See other vehicle-based mash-ups at Geek Tyrant.

Speaking of movie vehicle mash-ups, here’s your latest Mad Max: Fury Road parody, mixed with Cars, which should be called Mad Mater: Fury Road (via Pixel Faker):

Cosplay of the Day: Dogs as Minions is a thing. See more on Twitter via Jordan Zakarin here and here.

Watch the intro to the old Superfriends cartoon redone with the characters’ live-action counterparts (via Geek Tyrant):

Here’s a poster mashing up all your favorite movie robots (via /Film):

Today is the 95th anniversary of Max Fleischer‘s very early live-action/animation hybrid The Ouija Board, from the Out of the Inkwell series. Watch it in full below.

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


The Last Sci-Fi Blog: Celebrate 'Jurassic World' by Watching a Movie Where Astronauts Fight Dinosaurs

Jurassic World hasn’t even opened yet and people are already talking about a sequel. And why not? The fourth film in this ever-beloved franchise is on track to make a ton of money in its opening weekend. Unless the movie is a total critical disaster that everyone hates, a follow-up will happen, even if director Colin Trevorrow won’t be around to yell “Action!” and “Cut!” It’s inevitable.

So that brings us to the question of the moment: where do you go after Jurassic World? After all, they’ve already upped the ante from “park” to “world,” which is one helluva jump. The next step is obvious and natural: it’s time to send the dinosaurs to outer space.

Okay, this is where I’ll get serious. No, I do not think a fifth Jurassic Park movie should take place in space. That’s a terrible a terrible idea. Granted, it’s a terrible idea that I would pay big bucks to see, but I would never actually endorse it…even though the thought of a T-Rex floating through a zero-g pen desperately trying to devour hapless astronauts makes the caveman corners of my brain light up with idiotic glee. The real reason I bring this up is because Jurassic World is currently saturating the market with all things dinosaur and I can’t stop thinking of one the best bad science fiction movies I have ever seen: Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet.

Since no one has actually made “Jurassic Park in Space,” Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet has the unique honor of being the only film to remotely come close to that delirious logline. Released in 1965, the film follows a team of space explorers who land on the surface of Venus, only to learn that the Earth’s next door neighbor is, inexplicably, home to dinosaurs. The result is 74 minutes of poorly dubbed actors running around inexpensive but surprisingly gorgeous sets while getting in firefights with people in dinosaur costumes.

To be fair, the version that you will find in every B-movie box set is the ruthlessly re-edited American cut of a supposedly superior Soviet movie. However, we will say this much for what the American distributors did to the film: they did everything in their power to make the whole thing incomprehensible.

No one will ever accuse the American cut of Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet of being good, but I will stand here and accuse it of being one of the best movies you will ever watch when you’re under influence of your choice substance. Like many cheap genre movies, it takes a little while to get going (and there are endless scenes of characters flying or driving nowhere in particular), but the good stuff is so good that it has to be seen to be believed. This is the only movie ever made where astronauts, with glass bubble helmets and everything, fire handguns at velociraptors.

And while you will find plenty to laugh about when you watch this movie, a part of you, deep down inside, will realize that this thing is ripe for rediscovery. Hell, it’s ripe for a remake! Imagine astronauts battling dinosaurs on a $150 million budget! Imagine a certified genius like Guillermo del Toro calling the shots. If that doesn’t stir up your nerdy interest than you have to answer an important question: what is it like to not know joy?

Don’t take my word for it. Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet has fallen into the public domain and you can watch it in the YouTube embed below. I can guarantee that you will have as much fun with this movie as you will with Jurassic World (even if you have fun for all of the wrong reasons).

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


University of North Carolina Charged With Five 'Level 1' Violations By NCAA

The Old Well on campus at The University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, N.C. Reports from the school and the NCAA say UNC-Chapel Hill faculty and staff oversaw a student-athlete grade-inflation scheme that lasted almost twenty years.

The Old Well on campus at The University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, N.C. Reports from the school and the NCAA say UNC-Chapel Hill faculty and staff oversaw a student-athlete grade-inflation scheme that lasted almost twenty years. Gerry Broome/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Gerry Broome/AP

Last October, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill released findings from an internal investigation that revealed approximately 3,000 students — mostly student athletes — had their grades inflated through sham courses in the school’s African and Afro-American studies department over a span of almost 20 years.

Now the NCAA has hit the school with five “Level 1” violations, or “severe breaches of contract” because of that grade-inflation. The NCAA says UNC faculty and staff did the following:

-University faculty and staff provided “special arrangements to student athletes that were not generally available to the student body,” including offering classes as independent study courses with little if any attendance requirements and “artificially high final grades.”

-A philosophy instructor who also served as an athletic academic counselor “knowingly provided extra benefits in the form of impermissible academic assistance and special arrangements.”

-The head of the school’s African and Afro-American studies department and a student services manager in that department withheld information from the NCAA during their investigation and refused to participate in interviews with UNC officials and NCAA enforcement staff.

-The university failed to monitor the behavior of faculty and staff involved in the grade inflation scheme. The school also failed to monitor the academic departments involved. The NCAA says the sham courses existed for 18 years and went mostly unchecked by the school.

UNC-Chapel Hill says it received the notice of allegations from the NCAA on May 20, but waited to post it until the school’s Public Records Office could review it. School Chancellor Carol F. Folt and Director of Athletics Bubba Cunningham issued a statement that says the school takes the allegations seriously and will respond to the notice “using facts and evidence to present a full picture of our case.” The statement continues:

“We believe the University has done everything possible to address the academic irregularities that ended in 2011 and prevent them from recurring. We have implemented more than 70 reforms and initiatives to ensure and enhance academic integrity. We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of those measures and, wherever needed, put additional safeguards in place.”

The statement also says, “Although we may identify some instances in the NCAA’s notice where we agree and others where we do not, we are committed to continue pursuing a fair and just outcome for Carolina.”

UNC-Chapel Hill says once it responds to the NCAA’s notice of allegations, the NCAA has 60 days to send its own response. A hearing will then take place “later this fall,” with final infractions expected six to eight weeks later.

NPR previously reported on UNC-Chapel Hill’s grade inflation scandal, which first came to light in 2011. Last October, the school said it would launch a new public records website to “enhance accountability,” add faculty to a group that reviews student athlete eligibility, establish a working group to help people share concerns about academics, and implement a plan to “stabilize” the school’s Department of African, African American and Diaspora Studies, the department where most of the grade-fixing took place.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


Trader Joe's Ex-President Opens Store With Aging Food And Cheap Meals

Noemi Sosa looks at an apple as she shops at Daily Table, the first nonprofit supermarket. It's located in Dorchester, Mass.
2:23

Download

Noemi Sosa looks at an apple as she shops at Daily Table, the first nonprofit supermarket. It’s located in Dorchester, Mass. Jesse Costa/WBUR hide caption

itoggle caption Jesse Costa/WBUR

Daily Table opened its doors Thursday with shelves full of surplus and aging food.

The nonprofit grocery store is in the low-to-middle income Boston neighborhood of Dorchester. It’s selling canned vegetables two for $1 and a dozen eggs for 99 cents. Potatoes are 49 cents a pound. Bananas are 29 cents a pound.

“That’s good. It’s cheap! Everything good,” says Noemi Sosa, a shopper marveling at the prices that — for Boston — are phenomenally low.

Daily Table founder Doug Rauch greets customer Latoya Rush after she walks into the store.

Daily Table founder Doug Rauch greets customer Latoya Rush after she walks into the store. Jesse Costa/WBUR hide caption

itoggle caption Jesse Costa/WBUR

The reason these prices are so low? Most of the stock is donated by food wholesalers and markets. It either didn’t sell, or it’s surplus.

Grocery stores like Trader Joe’s aren’t donating any food to the Daily Table yet, but the plan is to get food from them eventually, too.

It was Doug Rauch, the former president of supermarket chain Trader Joe’s, who came up with this concept. He was frustrated by the amount of nutritious food that went into dumpsters, just because it’s nearing its sell-by date. Meanwhile, millions of people don’t eat very well. But Rauch had to fight the critics, who said he was just dumping food rejected by rich people on the poor.

Rauch first announced he would open the store in September 2013.

“It’s been a long time coming,” he says.

Checking out with the cashier, customer Manuel Goncalves admits he surveyed the expiration dates before putting food in his basket.

“I looked around, I saw the date. I saw the food being prepared in the back,” he says. “And I felt comfortable to come back and buy as much as I can.

His groceries come to $30.46. “That’s it? Wow!” says Goncalves.

In the preparation kitchen, Marilyn Rush dispenses black beans into cups ready to be packed and sent out for retail.

In the preparation kitchen, Marilyn Rush dispenses black beans into cups ready to be packed and sent out for retail. Jesse Costa/WBUR hide caption

itoggle caption Jesse Costa/WBUR

For just over $30, he walks out with what looks like enough groceries to feed his family for a week.

Besides selling staples, Daily Table is also cooking up prepared meals on a rotating menu. “The recipes have to change every day because the donations change every day,” says head kitchen chef Ismail Samad. Even though the food is not as new as what’s in your local supermarket, that doesn’t mean it’s bad, he adds.

“The top of the kale might be getting a little light green. We cut that off and sauté it up,” says Samad.

He hopes customers in Dorchester eat it up. If they do, founder Doug Rauch wants to expand this model to other cities across the country.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Former Goalie Says U.S. Women's Soccer Team Looks 'Incredibly Strong'

4:33

Download

The 2015 Women’s World Cup opens in Canada Saturday. NPR’s Melissa Block talks to former goalie Briana Scurry about the U.S. team’s prospects. Scurry was on the last U.S. team that won in 1999.

Transcript

MELISSA BLOCK, HOST:

You can count me among the many millions who can’t wait for the Women’s World Cup to get underway this weekend. Over the next month, 24 national teams will be playing in six cities across Canada. Japan is the defending champion. The U.S. women will be trying to end a long drought. They haven’t won the World Cup since 1999, and they won that championship in large part thanks to goalie Briana Scurry. She’s retired now from soccer and joins me here in the studio to talk about what’s in store for this World Cup.

Welcome. Thanks for coming in.

BRIANA SCURRY: Thanks for having me, I appreciate it.

BLOCK: And let’s start with the U.S. team. You’ve been watching them play in friendlies leading up to the World Cup. How do they look to you? What are the strengths, what are the weaknesses?

SCURRY: The U.S. team looks incredible strong. One of the reasons is because they have a great mixture of players who have incredible experience, like Abby Wambach, Christie Rampone, Shannon Boxx, and then some young players that are coming into the team that are really making a difference like, Sydney Leroux and Alex Morgan. And so it’s very encouraging to see this great team coming in. They didn’t have the greatest result on their friendly game that they played last week against South Korea, but I’m not really concerned about that because I know that there’s different things that go on with a lead-up game that may not be a factor for the actual finals.

BLOCK: What other teams – what other countries are you looking at that look like really strong threats to you?

SCURRY: I feel, honestly, five teams have a very good chance of winning. The USA of course, is always a favorite. You have Germany, who won in 2007, didn’t do that well in 2011. They have a score to settle. France is looking very good as well. They’re not a team that the U.S. is playing until later in the round. And Japan, who’s the defending champion, they’re always a contender. And one dark horse that I do want people to pay notice to is Canada. They are having the World Cup in their home country. There is a intangible element to being the home team that can lift them up and maybe help them rise further in the tournament than you think they would go otherwise.

BLOCK: This World Cup is opening of course in the shadow of the FIFA scandals – the corruption scandals, the arrests, the announced resignation of FIFA’s president, Sepp Blatter. What’s your take on FIFA and what’s going on there?

SCURRY: Last Wednesday when I heard the allegations, the one thing that made the biggest impact on me was, oh no, look at these horrible allegations that are coming out 10 days before the Women’s World Cup begins. As a soccer player, as somebody who loves the game, I wanted the focus to be on the 24 teams, especially the USA. That was my initial feeling. And now that this has ruled-out a little bit, now I feel like, you know what? It’s better that FIFA gets this handled and that this gets taken care of and that we get the bad elements that were clearly in FIFA out of FIFA so that we can really do a transformation.

BLOCK: I want to take you back, Briana, to the 1999 World Cup final against China. It was a scoreless game, so it went to a shootout – to penalty kicks to determine the winner. You’re in goal for the United States. China and the U.S. both score on their first two shots and then – let’s listen to what happened next.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED BROADCASTER: Ying will go next, the first starter for China to take a penalty kick

(APPLAUSE)

UNIDENTIFIED BROADCASTER: The shot. Save – Scurry.

(APPLAUSE)

BLOCK: (Laughter) Briana, you just did a fist pump in the studio. You’re still re-living that moment, 16 years later…

SCURRY: It never gets old. It never gets old.

BLOCK: …When you made that save.

SCURRY: It’s awesome. It’s awesome. I still – I mean, hearing that for me, it just brought me right back there, which is really cool.

BLOCK: After you make that save, you are ferocious on the field. You are pumping your fist and I don’t know what you’re saying. Are you saying yes, or…

SCURRY: Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying.

BLOCK: Shouting.

SCURRY: Yes. For me, in focusing for huge moments like that, I consider myself someone who is like a coil. So I was coiled-up, ready to spring for every penalty kick, and so I was a coil. And then once I sprung to make that save, all the emotion, all the training, all the years of waiting to be able to have this moment and planning for it in my mind and doing the mental work it takes for the mentality of it, in that moment, I was living what I had envisioned for so long. And so emotions were just flowing out of me, and that’s what you saw.

BLOCK: Briana Scurry, thanks so much for coming in.

SCURRY: Thank you for having me, appreciate it.

BLOCK: And enjoy the World Cup.

SCURRY: I will. You too.

BLOCK: Briana Scurry, goalie for the world champion 1999 U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team, also a two- time Olympic gold medalist.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Lightning Hope Lesson Was Learned In Opening Game Loss To Blackhawks

With a 2-1 victory over the Tampa Bay Lightning in the Stanley Cup finals safely behind him, Chicago Blackhawks’ goalie Corey Crawford summed up what it took to win: “They sat back in the third.”

In the third period Wednesday night, the Tampa Bay Lightning did sit back and, in doing so, dropped a relentless attacking style that had got them to their first Stanley Cup final in over a decade.

The Lightning got the lead early in the game, with one of the more spectacular goals in recent Stanley Cup history. With his back to the net, forward Alex Killorn batted a shot out of mid-air and past a stunned Crawford.

Tampa kept up the pressure for the first two periods, but Crawford, who has become more dominant as these playoffs have progressed, kept them off the scoreboard.

After that, the Lightning appeared content to protect their slim lead.

Two third period Chicago goals, minutes apart, proved what a mistake that was. The Lightning didn’t recover.

“Against a team like Chicago, you can’t let them keep coming at you the way we did,” said Tampa coach Jon Cooper after the game.

Still, there are plenty of upsides here for the young, talented Lightning team. In losing by only a goal, they proved they are a match for a veteran Blackhawks squad that is making its third Stanley Cup final appearance in the six past years. The ‘Hawks are a team of living legends, featuring stars like Jonathan Toews, Patrick Sharp, Duncan Keith and Patrick Kane, whose stickhandling abilities border on wizardry.

But Tampa has arguably the best young talent in the NHL right now. Its usually dangerous triplets line, featuring Tyler Johnson, Nikita Kucherov and Ondrej Palat, all in the top eight playoff goal scorers, failed to score a point Wednesday night. If they start clicking, what is already shaping up to be an entertaining series will only be more so.

Game 2 is in Tampa Bay at 8:00 PM.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.