It’s win or go home for the United States in Women’s World Cup soccer today. The U.S. takes on Colombia in the round of 16 in Edmonton, Canada. The U.S. is ranked second in the world and Colombia is 28th, but in this tournament, rankings don’t necessarily mean much. Consider:

• Colombia shocked third-ranked France 2-0 in group play (arguably the biggest upset in the opening round).
• Australia stunned Brazil 1-0 on Sunday to advance to the quarterfinals.

The U.S. placed first in its group; Colombia third. On paper, the U.S. should win and is heavily favored. Colombia has never beaten the U.S. (and hasn’t even scored a goal against the Americans). Colombia won’t have its starting goalkeeper. Sandra Sepulveda was suspended after receiving her second yellow card of the tournament.

None of that has slowed the trash-talk. Colombian star Lady Andrade told USA Today that Colombia would still win: “We’re going to beat them since they like to talk so much.” The last time these two teams met, there was controversy. In the 2012 Olympics, Andrade punched U.S. forward Abby Wambach in the face, giving her a black eye. Andrade was suspended for two games.

The U.S. hasn’t lost during this World Cup. But the team still hasn’t hit its stride this tournament, either. Head coach Jill Ellis has tinkered with the starting lineup in each of the three games so far. The defense, led by Julie Johnston (and Hope Solo, of course) has looked the best for the U.S. Up front, Ellis has struggled to find the perfect formula of speed, agility and team cohesion to score goals. (Christen Press, Abby Wambach, Sydney Leroux and Alex Morgan have all had starts.) The U.S. dominated Australia in their opener, winning 3-1. But the Americans struggled against Sweden with a scoreless draw, and a tight 1-0 victory over Nigeria.

But that doesn’t matter now. It’s the knockout round of the World Cup. The winner advances to the quarterfinals, and the loser heads home.

Kickoff is at 8 p.m. ET. You can watch the game on Fox Sports 1 and NBC Universo.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.

Another major for 21-year-old Jordan Spieth. Another stunning loss for Dustin Johnson.

Chambers Bay delivered heart-stopping drama Sunday in the U.S. Open when Spieth birdied his final hole to become only the sixth player to win the Masters and the U.S. Open in the same year. The real shock was not that he won, but how he won.

Moments earlier, Spieth could only watch as Johnson had a 12-foot eagle putt for the victory. Johnson ran the putt just over 3 feet past the cup, and his short birdie attempt to force a Monday playoff rolled past the lip.

“I’m in shock,” Spieth said, who now goes to St. Andrews next month in his pursuit of golf’s holy grail — the calendar Grand Slam.

For all the criticism of Chambers Bay, this was theater at its finest.

Spieth looked like he had this wrapped up when he rolled in a 25-foot birdie putt on the 16th hole, turning toward Puget Sound before he pumped his fist. With Branden Grace hitting a tee shot onto the railroad tracks to make double bogey, Spieth had a three-shot lead.

And then it was gone.

He took double bogey on the 17th hole. Louis Oosthuizen made one last birdie — six of his last seven holes for a 67 — to post at 4-under 276. Johnson, who had a two-shot lead at the turn until missing so many putts on the back nine, was forgotten.

Spieth, a wire-to-wire winner at Augusta National, showed he can be clutch. He drilled a 3-wood off the back slope to 15 feet and two-putted for his birdie and a 69 to finish at 5-under 275. Johnson, in the final group behind him, made a 4-foot birdie on the 17th and needed a birdie to force a playoff.

He blasted his drive so far that he only had 5-iron to the par-5 18th, and that rolled up to 15 feet left of the hole. Make it and win. Two putts for a playoff.

He made par.

It was the fourth heartache for Johnson in the majors, and the worst.

Spieth was waiting to use the bathroom when Johnson came out. It was an awkward pat on the back. There wasn’t much to say.

Jason Day, who collapsed on Friday with vertigo only to rally for a share of the 54-hole lead, fell back with missed putt and was never in the hunt on the back nine. He closed with a 74 to finish five shots behind.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.

When the U.S. Open Golf Championship began on Thursday, 156 players took center stage.

So did the golf course where they were playing.

It’s rare for the venue at a major tournament to grab as much attention as the star players. But Chambers Bay in University Place, Wash., near Tacoma, is a rare place to play golf. It’s improbable, controversial — and, according to its supporters, it represents the future of the game.

‘A Dream Fulfilled’

Surveying the course that he built, renowned golf course architect Robert Trent “Bobby” Jones Jr. sounds like a proud parent.

“It’s a dream fulfilled,” he says, standing alongside the course’s 18th fairway. “I have spent my entire life in golf. And I cannot tell you how proud I am that our national championship has come to a course of our design.”

You can understand that pride when you consider the dramatic transformation at Chambers Bay, which opened in 2007.

Before Jones began his major makeover in 2004, the site was a former quarry. Stone was mined to build the highways of Washington State and skyscrapers in Seattle, among other things. The process left behind a big, sandy pit.

“It really was kind of an ugly place,” Jones says. “The area had been mined for over a hundred years and it was basically clawed out, creating this large bowl.”

The vision for turning a big sandbox into a golf course came first from Pierce County Executive John Ladenburg. But Ladenburg encountered resistance to his plan to convert the 900-acre site, using public funds, into a recreation area including a golf course. “Ladenburg’s folly,” critics cried.

But he pressed ahead and put the design up for bid, according to Golf Digest, with the twin goals of creating a links-style course like those popularized in the British Isles — and someday hosting a U.S. Open at Chambers Bay.

Jones’ firm won the bid. It’s the designer/architect’s job to look at a big place like that and, if not see beauty, at least see potential. And when asked if he knew he could do something with the big pit, Jones smiles and blurts out an enthusiastic “Yes!”

A Bit Of Britain In The Pacific Northwest

For Jones, you may as well have draped the site in an enormous Union Jack. So much about the place made him believe it could be fashioned into a links-like course, following the style developed in the U.K. — which meant being near the sea, at sea level and open to the elements.

Puget Sound was Chambers’ sea and the afternoon winds and Northwest rain fit the “elements” bill.

Sand, everywhere, was particularly exciting.

“Sand is everything. We architects would kill for sand,” Jones says. “If you get a sandy site, you can craft it with the bulldozers and shape the shapes you want.”

And boy, did he shape. Jones calls Chambers Bay a “three-dimensional links course” with a vertical component not seen in the classic flat, moonscape-y courses in Britain. There’s a 200-foot difference from Puget Sound up to the top of Chambers Bay.

“You travel that distance three times walking the full 18 holes,” Jones says. “This is a hard walk: 7 1/2 miles minimum, probably more like 10 — and changing elevations. You’ll sleep well after you play here!”

Adding to the difficulty of both walking and playing is the unique grass carpeting Chambers Bay. The massive amounts of sand were an invitation to grow fescue grasses, an indigenous grass of the British Isles that grows well in sandy soil.

The thin, rounded blades grow in a closely cropped way.

“It’s tight,” Jones says. “When you walk on it, it’s firm underfoot. Actually, a hard walk, physically, on your feet.”

Hard on golf balls, too.

On top of that natural “tightness,” the fescue turf at Chambers Bay is mowed very closely. Balls don’t just bounce — they ricochet, says Jones.

And they roll forever. This is one of the unique challenges for golfers used to the traditional parkland courses with lush, giving grass — where a player can calculate a distance, hit the ball to that distance and have it stop on a dime.

There are no dimes in links golf — only slick surfaces and undulating mounds. Chambers Bay adds the extra challenge of elevation changes — and in the afternoon, the winds that start blowing in from the Sound.

The golfers who succeed in this environment are the most creative, the best thinkers and the ones who can best control their shots.

It’s a true test of golfers vs. golf course. But in the abstract, says Jones, “It’s the golfers vs. me!”

The Goalkeeper of Chambers Bay

A golfer stepped into the enormous, sandy bunker on the 18th hole and rifled a shot toward the green. Jones liked what he saw — and heard.

“You can tell by the click” of the shot,” he says. “When it’s hit properly like that, it sounds authoritative, and it is.”

Like any spectator, Jones appreciates a good shot. But the 75-year-old also sees himself as a competitor, facing off with the tournament’s 156 players. And Chambers Bay is his prized weapon.

“Think of me as the goalkeeper standing in the net, and I’m seeing the players come at me,” he says.

His defenses are the sand, the slick fescue, the undulations and bumps and hills. Some of the trickiest spots have names – like the Mummy Mound, Hell’s Bunker and Chambers Basement, a particularly penal 12-foot-deep bunker in the middle of the 18th fairway.

Despite his defenses and competitiveness, Jones wants the course, ultimately, to yield.

“But only to great shot-making, thoughtful, creative shot-making, tactical thinking. And courage,” he says.

We’ve seen that creativity in the tournament so far: putting 20 feet in the opposite direction of the hole, hitting approach shots away from the flag, playing a ball beyond a hole and using the sharp undulations to have the ball circle back to the target.

When it works, you hear the roar at Chambers Bay.

When it doesn’t, a moan — or silence. And there’s a knowing shake of the head from Jones.

“When a player doesn’t make a great shot, it’s not that I’m rooting for them [to mess up],” he says. “But when [a player] doesn’t succeed, then he deserves the punishment he’s had given to him by the defense.”

The punishment naturally has elicited grumbles. What would a U.S. Open be without some players — especially those plummeting down the leaderboard — challenging the traditionally tough courses?

But at Chambers Bay, there appears to be a consensus that the course’s punishment is not always deserved — and the greens are not what they should be.

Brownish Greens, Bouncing Balls

To those watching on TV, it’s a bit of a shock to see not only the brownish greens of Chambers Bay, but splotchy patterns. It’s not a shock to the U.S. Golf Association, which runs the tournament. In fact, USGA executive director Mike Davis talked about it the day before the Open began.

“A majority of the greens here, we do have some poa annua,” Davis said.

Poa annua is a turf grass that has mingled with the fescue on the greens, causing the splotchiness — and a different consistency, which means bounciness with a putted ball.

Darin Bevard, Director of Championship Agronomy for the USGA, explained it this way to Golf magazine: “The poa and the fescue grow at different rates during the day … With the extra moisture in the morning, the poa stands up more, so conditions are bumpier. In the afternoon, the growth habit [of the poa and the fescue] becomes more similar. However, the sun and the breeze throughout the day makes the greens firmer and in some cases faster, so there’s definitely variation from morning to afternoon.”

The USGA’s Davis, whom Jones describes as the “conductor” of the U.S. Open (Jones calls himself the “composer”), says, “Ultimately, what we’re after is how [the greens] play. We want them as smooth as possible.”

Through the tournament’s first two days, a number of players grumbled that the USGA had a long way to go.

Sergio Garcia, who played well enough to make the cut and qualify for the weekend’s final two rounds, fired the first salvo on Twitter: The “greens are as bad as the[y] look on TV.”

More criticism followed. Veteran Colin Montgomerie, who also made the cut, said, “The greens are extremely poor. A course of this demanding nature had to be in perfect condition and unfortunately, it is not.”

And Friday, after dropping from a tie for first to a tie for 12th, Sweden’s Henrik Stenson made two colorful analogies – saying putting on the Chambers Bay greens was like putting on “broccoli” and like putting on “the surface of the moon.”

Not surprisingly, the players at the top of the leaderboard did not join the negative chorus. Indeed, those who putted firmly and with confidence seemed to have more success than tentative putters. And it makes sense: Speed and firmness cut through the uneven surface better and on a truer line. If a golfer doesn’t hit his ball with authority, the bumps will take over and direct it who knows where.

Of course, a firm putt might also skitter off the green and into a yawning bunker.

As they say, golf is risk … and reward.

With sunny, warm and breezy weather hanging over Chambers Bay, the situation may resolve itself through Saturday and Sunday. Tournament officials are hoping the poa sits down — and the critics stand down.

Gold Is Beautiful — and Sustainable

After all is said and done — and criticized — Jones hopes Chambers Bay has a lasting effect on the game of golf, and not just at the championship level. He’s hoping golfers everywhere come to embrace the aesthetics of the links.

“We hope that all golf courses take a look at this beautiful U.S. Open and look at the transformation from the color of spring — green — to the golden color of summer at this solstice moment,” he says. “And they will see gold is a beautiful color.”

And, he adds, it’s a necessary color if golf is to survive and thrive in a drier world.

“We think the less turf, less water consumption, less fertilizer, fewer pesticides and herbicides means sustainable use of the terrain and therefore less money to maintain,” he says.

Jones says Chambers Bay will require one-third of the budget required to maintain green-carpeted Augusta National, home of the Masters, for a year.

Granted, fescue, while a much less needy grass, is not for every climate. But Jones hopes the general message that gold golf courses are beautiful starts to sink in. “It’s the future of the game,” he says.

For now, there’s a major golf tournament to finish.

And by the time there’s a winner, organizers at Chambers Bay hope this unique and controversial golf course will be declared a victor as well, in its debut on the sport’s biggest stage.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.

Two of the NBA’s greatest players were once again in the spotlight on Tuesday night when Steph Curry and the Golden State Warriors beat LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers to win the 2015 NBA Finals. Curry and James are headline factories, but another one-time NBA MVP has also generated buzz in recent weeks: Allen Iverson, the swaggering megastar of the late 90s, is the subject of the Washington Post’s Kent Babb’s new biography, Not A Game.

Iverson’s dramatic fall from millionaire idol to broke has-been ultimately eclipsed his otherworldly skill with a basketball, but his story is far more complex than irresponsible spending. Iverson certainly isn’t the only athlete to blow a fortune and struggle personally – former boxer Mike Tyson and former NFL player Vince Young usually come to mind. For Babb, it was Iverson’s transcendent status as a pop-culture icon that made his fall from grace compelling enough to warrant a book.

“Just the fact that he was going to have his cornrows and he was going to have his tattoos and he was going to talk and dress the way he wanted to and no one was going tell him otherwise […] To know that he made mistakes, his family was dissolving and his fortune is going away, he’s having a hard time with his identity now that his basketball career is finishing – It’s like seeing Superman without his cape on.”

Babb’s book delves into the complexities of the player nicknamed “The Answer,” although a sense of incompleteness clings to certain parts of the narrative because Iverson and those closest to him declined to be interviewed. Babb says Iverson’s agent made it clear that participation would come at a cost, not just in dollars and cents but in control.

“I think it would have been better with his voice,” Babb said of the book. “I just know that wouldn’t have been the case [that he would have talked]. I mean, forget about asking for money and whether they need to be compensated and all this […], but I think it was more about the control. I was never going to write the fluffy ‘this is how awesome a basketball player Iverson was.'”

But interviewing dozens of people, reading hundreds of news accounts and drawing on more than 600 pages of court records, Babb assembled a mosaic of a man, with mood swings faster than his feared crossover. Iverson accomplished incredible feats on the basketball court even as his demons double-teamed him off of it.

When it first hit the shelves on June 2, the book garnered widespread attention because Babb wrote that many people both in and outside of the Sixers’ organization believed Iverson was under the influence of alcohol during an infamous practice rant.

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith, a friend of Iverson’s, called Babb’s description of the incident a “flat-out lie,” and defended Iverson on air.

I’ve known Allen Iverson for 19 years. Allen Iverson and I speak every week. We spoke this morning for 45 minutes. I might know a thing or two about basketball. I might know a thing or two about a lot of things. I know a hell of a lot more about Allen Iverson. I challenge any journalist in America to tell you they know him better than I do … Allen Iverson and I spoke for 45 minutes this morning.

For his part, Babb says Smith and others took exception with that particular part of the book, instead of with other, far grislier details about Iverson’s life, because it was one of the few things in the book that didn’t come from sworn court documents and public records.

“This was through interviews. And I think if you’re going to – it’s interesting warfare and probably a good strategy — if you’re going to attack something, don’t go for the things that are going to be most easily backed up,” Babb said, adding that if his critics had read the book, there would have been a different conversation.

Babb portrays Iverson’s inability to accept limits as one of his major flaws. From his childhood in Hampton, Va., where he endured a troubled childhood and landed in jail at 18; in his relationship with his ex-wife, Tawanna, who alleged that he was physically and verbally abusive; while playing in Philadelphia where he shot to fame with the Sixers, despite endless arguments with head coach Larry Brown; and even out in public, Iverson’s ferocity may have pushed him to the highest peak in professional sports, but then inertia carried him over the cliff.

“He’s a man of extremes. He would either be wonderful or terrible,” Babb said.

“Terrible” often seems like an understatement. According to the book, Iverson told his wife he would pay a man $5,000 to have her killed and that his wife’s attorney suggested he had drunkenly urinated on the floor in front of his children. Yet it’s hard to write Iverson off as a monster, because the book recounts impressive flashes of kindness. Babb details Iverson’s familial and affectionate relationship with his former Georgetown athletic trainer, Lorry Michel, his admirable loyalty to his friends and those who helped him along the way, and his thoughtful tribute to long-time Philadelphia sportswriter, Phil Jasner, after his death. Even when he argues Iverson used charm and promises to finagle his way back into the good graces of those people he burned again and again, Babb’s portrayal of a tender side keep the reader hoping that real redemption may be just a page or two away.

Babb also weaves in lively play-by-play accounts from Iverson’s heyday, each flashback imbued with such energy it will send even the most casual sports fan searching for the highlights on YouTube. One of the most memorable happened in Game 1 of the 2001 NBA Finals when the six-foot-tall Iverson easily worked around the Lakers’ Tyronn Lue, who tumbled to the floor. Just to make sure the world knew who was in charge, Iverson took a very big and very deliberate step over Lue as he lay sprawled on the court.

“It was the little guy stepping over, if not the biggest guy, but then the biggest team. The Lakers hadn’t lost in weeks and they lost that game and it was just this great, real-life, real-time defiant moment that every little guy, every little person in the country who had maybe been marginalized could identify with,” Babb said.

Despite his admiration for Iverson as a player, Babb says he knew going into this project that this would likely not end with a triumphant comeback. And it doesn’t. The book ends with an image of Iverson failing, repeatedly, to show up at his own summer camp, choosing instead to while-away the day in a hotel bar, searching for his lost glory at the bottom of Corona bottles. But for all his research, Babb says he does think change is possible for Iverson, who at 40 years of age is still relatively young.

“People ask me all the time, do I think he can change, is there hope for Allen Iverson? And I think yes,” Babb said, tempering his optimistic assessment with a splash of cynicism: “And maybe I’m just like the rest of them.”

Iverson does still have people in his corner. After writing the book, Babb found out that Iverson and his ex-wife, Tawanna, have reconciled — something Babb admits he thought impossible — and that Iverson’s former Sixers coach, Larry Brown, is trying to help him find a position within the organization.

Not A Game captures the magic of Allen Iverson: it’s hard to root for him, but somehow, it’s even harder to root against him.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.