Articles by admin

No Image

The Giant Foam Finger: How Do You Choose Your Favorite Team?

If you rooted for Washington's NFL team because of Robert Griffin III, you'll almost certainly root for a new team this fall.
11:48

Download

If you rooted for Washington’s NFL team because of Robert Griffin III, you’ll almost certainly root for a new team this fall. Ezra Shaw/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

A few months ago, Code Switch lead blogger Gene Demby turned to Twitter in an attempt to crowd-source a solution to a problem he’d been having. Gene had begun watching Premier League soccer but couldn’t settle on a rooting interest, so he asked the league’s fans to convince him to root for one team or another.

In this episode of The Giant Foam Finger — our occasional sports-themed offshoot of Pop Culture Happy Hour — I open by asking Gene for an update on his Premier League search. But then we move on to a farther-reaching discussion of why we might root for one team or another in any sport, for reasons ranging from geography to friendship, familial bonds, favorite individual athletes, bandwagon-jumping and even good old-fashioned spite.

Naturally, given the theme of crowd-sourcing, we’d love to hear what listeners think. What made you choose your favorite teams? And, given the inspiration for this discussion, we’d love to hear more arguments for why Gene and I should root for your favorite Premier League team. So have at it in the comments, or on Twitter or Facebook.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Opioid Abuse Takes A Toll On Workers And Their Employers

The effects of opioid abuse can go unnoticed at work.
4:30

Download

The effects of opioid abuse can go unnoticed at work. George Doyle/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption George Doyle/Getty Images

Three decades ago, the treatment Michele Zumwalt received for severe headaches involved a shot of the opioid Demerol. Very quickly, Zumwalt says, she would get headaches if she didn’t get her shot. Then she began having seizures, and her doctor considered stopping the medication.

“I didn’t know I was addicted, but I just knew that it was like you were going to ask me to live in a world without oxygen,” she says. “It was that scary.”

Zumwalt didn’t cut back. In fact, over two decades, the Sacramento, Calif., resident got an ever-increasing number of opioid prescriptions — all while working in corporate sales.

“I could show up at Xerox and put on a presentation, and I was high on Percodan,” she recalls. “I mean, fully out of it. I don’t know how many I had taken, but so many that I don’t remember the presentation. And do you know that people didn’t know?”

Her addiction worsened, eventually forcing her to take medical leave. Now sober for a dozen years, Zumwalt wrote a book about recovery called Ruby Shoes.

Her story highlights, among other things, the many challenges employers face in dealing with prescription drug abuse.

According to one study, prescription opioid abuse alone cost employers more than $25 billion in 2007. Other studies show people with addictions are far more likely to be sick or absent, or to use workers’ compensation benefits.

When it comes to workers’ comp, opioids are frequently prescribed when pain relievers are called for. How often doctors choose opioids varies by state; an analysis found the highest rates in Arkansas and Louisiana.

“The more professional stature you have, the less likely you are going to be forced into recovery, and the longer your addiction is likely to go on unchecked,” says Patrick Krill, who directs a treatment program at the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation that focuses on lawyers and judges. The legal profession has twice the addiction rate of the normal population, he says.

In December, the advocacy group National Safety Council released a survey showing 4 of 5 employers in Indiana said they’ve confronted painkiller abuse in the workplace.

“Many times they’re showing up late to work because they can’t find pills,” says Dr. Don Teater, medical adviser for the council. “They’re starting to have withdrawal symptoms. They know they can’t work.” He went from family physician in Clyde, N.C., to addiction specialist after seeing prescription opioids and heroin rip through his rural community.

Three-quarters of his patients have lost their jobs. Some manage to hide prescription drug abuse for years, he says, but it does affect brain function and productivity.

“They’re not as sharp. They’re not thinking as quickly,” he says. “For people working in safety-sensitive positions, you know, driving the forklift or something, their reactions might not be as fast.”

One of the biggest problems, Teater says, is that many employers aren’t testing for prescription opioids.

“I’ll be talking to 50 or 60 HR people, and I’ll say, ‘How many of you test for oxycodone?’ And a third of the hands will go up maybe. And oftentimes I’ll say, ‘How many don’t even know what you’re testing for?’ And a number of hands will go up.”

According to Quest Diagnostics, a testing firm, only 13 percent of the roughly 6.5 million workplace drug tests screen for prescription painkillers.

Even federal government workers in public safety positions who are required to undergo periodic drug testing aren’t currently tested for prescription opioids.

“Within federal agencies we don’t test, so we can’t see exactly what the positivity rate would be in prescription drugs,” says Ron Flegel, director of workplace programs for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. “But we know from the private employers the percentage is quite high as far as people that are testing positive.”

Flegel says in coming months, new rules will include prescription painkillers in federal drug testing.

Meanwhile, the tables have turned for Michele Zumwalt, the recovering addict. She now helps manage her husband’s construction firm. “Through the years, we’ve seen lots of people with addictions,” she says. “We can almost recognize it, you know, as employers.”

They urge the workers to get into rehab, she says, and hope they turn around.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

New 'Suicide Squad' Trailer Sets Up a Villainous Rhapsody

Suicide Squad

The first Suicide Squad trailer debuted during Comic-Con last summer and since then we’ve had to be content with a series of promotional images for a movie that will revolve around a team of superpowered individuals who are not exactly heroic in the traditional sense.

Deadshot, the world’s best marksman, is played by Will Smith, the most notable name in the ensemble cast. The other squad members are Harley Quinn (portrayed by Margot Robbie), Katana (Karen Fukuhara) and Captain Boomerang (Jai Courtney), along with Killer Croc (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje) and Rick Flagg (Joel Kinnaman).

The team is assembled by Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) as a secret task force to handle the jobs for which the government doesn’t want to claim responsibility. Among the foes they must face in the movie is the Joker (Jared Leto). The first trailer set up the mood and atmosphere; the second trailer, just released tonight, doesn’t reveal anything more about the plot, keeping the focus on the characters, all to the tune of Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody.”

[embedded content]

We know that Batman (Ben Affleck) will be making an appearance in the movie, perhaps with other players in the DC movie universe, although we didn’t see him in the trailer. David Ayer wrote the screenplay and directed. He wrote terrific movies like U-571, The Fast and the Furious, Training Day and S.W.A.T. before becoming a director, making End of Watch, Sabotage and Fury, all filled with rough action and a cynical sense of humor, which is very much on display in the new trailer.

Everything points to an above average and very dark thriller heading our way this summer. A new series of crazy posters for the movie debuted earlier this week, which you can check out in our gallery. (See one of them below.) Suicide Squad will open in theaters on August 5.

Suicide Squad

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Gun Stocks Up, But Activists Move To Expand Anti-Investment Push

Anti-gun groups and state officials joined New Yorkers Against Gun Violence to mark the sixth month anniversary of the Newtown massacre on the steps of New York City Hall in 2013.
3:42

Download

Anti-gun groups and state officials joined New Yorkers Against Gun Violence to mark the sixth month anniversary of the Newtown massacre on the steps of New York City Hall in 2013. Bebeto Matthews/AP hide caption

toggle caption Bebeto Matthews/AP

After years of trying and failing to push new laws through Congress, gun control advocates are targeting American firearms makers from a different angle.

“The only thing they really understand is money,” says Leah Gunn Barrett, executive director of the nonprofit New Yorkers Against Gun Violence. She’s also part of a coalition called the Campaign to Unload, which encourages investors large and small to divest from owning stock in companies that make guns and ammunition.

“You may not even know that your 401(k) has gun stocks in it,” Barrett says. “So asking the question is very, very important. Not only for individuals, but for public pension funds…it’s really raising the issue and making gun stocks toxic.”

Gun control advocates have been pushing for years to get investors to divest from companies that make firearms and ammunition. Now officials in New York City want to widen that push to include retailers. But not everyone thinks their divestment campaign will succeed.

“If it’s made to be punitive, it’s not going to work,” says Andrea James, a firearms industry analyst with Dougherty & Company. She says gun stocks have performed well because gun sales have been brisk.

“When the divestment happens,” James says, “I don’t think it really affects the underlying business, meaning the number of firearms they sell.”

The divestment camp has claimed some victories after mass shootings in Connecticut and California. Big institutional investors like the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and pension funds in New York and Philadelphia have dropped their holdings in gun companies.

But the stock price of those gun companies has not gone down. In fact, since the Sandy Hook shootings in 2012, the stock prices of Sturm, Ruger & Co. and Smith & Wesson have mostly gone up, even as big institutional investors have moved to sell.

“In a free and open market, other shareholders will come and take their place,” James says.

Members of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and the National Action Network march against gun violence on the streets of New York in 2012.

Members of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and the National Action Network march against gun violence on the streets of New York in 2012. Kathy Willens/AP hide caption

toggle caption Kathy Willens/AP

This includes some investors who want to hold gun stocks as an expression of support for the Second Amendment.

Still, divestment supporters say this latest push is different because it’s aiming beyond just the gun companies themselves. New York Public Advocate Letitia James is pushing the city’s largest pension fund to divest from national retailers that sell firearms, including Wal-Mart, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Cabela’s.

“It really sends a strong moral message that public dollars should not be used to prop up an industry that has caused so much carnage on the streets of New York City and other urban centers across this nation,” Letitia James says.

Letitia James and other divestment supporters point to the success of past campaigns against the tobacco and coal industries — especially the push to end the apartheid in South Africa. But even in that famous campaign, some economists question whether divestment had the kind of impact its supporters claim.

“Well, unfortunately, it does not have an effect,” says Paul Wazzan, an economist at the Berkeley Research Group in California. He has studied the divestment campaigns against companies that did business in South Africa in the 1980s and 1990s. Wazzan says there was no measurable effect on their stock prices.

“But it does generate a lot of press and interest,” Wazzan says. “And the political pressure starts to build and that did ultimately have an effect. It’s not what our paper was about, but I think the political pressure ultimately did have an effect on these companies.”

That kind of pressure is harder to measure than a stock price. But divestment supporters say it’s still worth a try.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Allegations Of Tennis Match-Fixing Overshadow Australian Open

The BBC and BuzzFeed published an investigative report alleging widespread match-fixing and corruption in the sport of tennis. The report was released just before the start of the Australian Open.

The BBC and BuzzFeed published an investigative report alleging widespread match-fixing and corruption in the sport of tennis. The report was released just before the start of the Australian Open. Rafiq Maqbool/AP hide caption

toggle caption Rafiq Maqbool/AP

No. 5 seed Rafael Nadal lost in the first round of the Australian Open to fellow Spaniard Fernando Verdasco in a five-set thriller on Tuesday. It’s only the second first-round loss in a major tournament for the former world No. 1, and the upset was the headline of the tournament so far — or, at least, it would have been.

On Sunday, the BBC and BuzzFeed published an investigative report alleging widespread match-fixing and corruption in tennis that is reverberating around the world.

The report — based on information from a “cache of leaked documents” from a 2008 probe commissioned by tennis authorities, the statistical analysis of 26,000 tennis matches and betting information from 2009 through 2015 — alleges that some players were paid to throw matches and that tennis officials did not act on the findings. The report says there is evidence that “winners of singles and doubles titles at Grand Slam tournaments are among [a] core group of 16 players who have repeatedly been reported for losing games when highly suspicious bets have been placed against them.”

The report also accuses the Tennis Integrity Unit, which was created following the 2008 probe, of not sufficiently pursuing and prosecuting allegations of match-fixing. Top tennis officials have categorically denied this.

“The Tennis Integrity Unit and tennis authorities absolutely reject any suggestion that evidence of match-fixing has been suppressed for any reason or isn’t being thoroughly investigated,” ATP Chairman Chris Kermode said at a news conference Monday, according to The Associated Press.

The report, which also alleges that one top-50 player competing in the Australian Open is suspected of “repeatedly fixing his first set,” did not name the implicated players, saying it couldn’t definitively prove they were involved in illegal activities. John Templon, the BuzzFeed reporter who collaborated on the report, told NPR’s All Things Considered that the exposé was meant to serve as a call to action for tennis authorities to crack down on match-fixing and betting in the sport.

World. No. 3 Roger Federer, however, said the names needed to be released in order for the sport to move forward.

“I mean, it’s, like, who, what? It’s, like, thrown around. It’s so easy to do that,” Federer said according to The Guardian. “I would love to hear names. Then at least it’s concrete stuff and you can actually debate about it. Was it the player? Was it the support team? Who was it? Was it before? Was it a doubles player, a singles player? Which slam? It’s so all over the place. It’s nonsense to answer something that is pure speculation.”

Roger Federer called for the release of players' names who were implicated in match-fixing.

Roger Federer called for the release of players’ names who were implicated in match-fixing. Rick Rycroft/AP hide caption

toggle caption Rick Rycroft/AP

The No. 2 player in the world, Andy Murray, said he would not be surprised if match-fixing was happening, even at the sport’s elite levels. He said: “I’ve been aware of it since I was quite young and I think when people come with big sums of money when you’re at that age, some people can make mistakes.”

At a press conference, the current top player in the world, Novak Djokovic, said he was approached to throw a match in 2007. He said someone propositioned a member of his team, offering $200,000 if Djokovic lost a match at the St. Petersburg Open in Russia. Djokovic said the offer was rejected and that he didn’t even play in the tournament. He went on to say that the sport has come a long way since 2007 and that he doesn’t think that match-fixing is a problem at the top levels of tennis.

Serena Williams, too, dismissed the allegations. “I play very hard and every player that I play plays very hard,” she said at a press conference. “If that’s going on, I don’t know about it.”

Paul Scotney, the director of Sports Integrity Services, was one of the lead investigators during the probe into tennis match-fixing back in 2008. He told NPR’s Morning Edition that the investigation uncovered a number of suspicious bets. He also said that tennis is “one of the three top sports for betting,” along with horse racing and soccer, and that that’s not going to change.

“So the facts are, it’s a bet-on sport and will continue to be a bet-on sport, and authorities need to understand that and work closely with the betting operators because of that,” Scotney said.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

People With Minor Injuries Are Increasingly Getting CT Scans

Neck strain might not feel like a CT-worthy injury to you, but it's increasingly getting advanced imaging.

Neck strain might not feel like a CT-worthy injury to you, but it’s increasingly getting advanced imaging. Reza Estakhrian/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Reza Estakhrian/Getty Images

If you fall off a curb, bop your head and go to the ER to make sure you’re OK, there’s a good chance you’ll be trundled off for a CT scan.

That might sound comforting, but people with injuries minor enough that they get sent home are increasingly being given computed tomography scans, a study finds. That’s despite efforts to reduce the unnecessary use of CTs, which use radiation and increase the lifetime risk of cancer.

There’s been a lot of focus on excess use of CTs in children, but much less on adults who go to the emergency department for things that turn out to be no big deal.

So researchers at the University of California, San Francisco looked at data on every single emergency department visit in the state from 2005 through 2013. They looked at people who had relatively minor injuries, focusing only on those who were sent home after being evaluated and treated. That could include people with fractures, sprains, strains and concussions.

Out of those 8,535,831 people with injuries that didn’t appear to be serious, 5.9 percent got at least one CT scan while they were in the emergency department. That number rose over time, from 3.51 percent in 2005 to 7.17 percent in 2013. The study was published Monday in the Journal of Surgical Research.

“There is a lot of awareness about overuse of CTs,” says Renee Hsia, a professor of emergency medicine and health policy at UCSF who was the senior author of the study. But patients and doctors both have reasons for wanting a scan.

“Patients tend to want to be safe, which is not a bad thing,” Hsia says, “but sometimes they want more rather than less. It’s a very American thing. Also doctors don’t want to miss anything.”

But safety comes with a price. The 72 million CT scans that Americans got in 2007 will cause 29,000 excess cancers, according to a 2009 study from the National Cancer Institute. Nearly 15,000 of those cancers could be fatal.

Efforts to get doctors to cut back on use of CTs may have caused the little downward blip in Hsia’s data from 2009 to 2011, but the numbers then continued to rise. CTs of the head were most popular. The pelvis and abdomen was the only body area that got scanned less often.

People who went to Level I and II trauma centers were more likely to get CTs, the authors found, which may reflect the culture of institutions used to dealing with severely injured patients.

As a practicing ED doctor, Hsia says there’s a lot pressure to scan patients and get them out the door rather than keep them in the hospital overnight for observation, as they would have done in the past. “There’s a lot of pressure for earlier and earlier diagnosis,” she says. “And there are consequences.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'SNL' Parodies 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens,' Honest Posters for Oscar Nominees and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Oscar Movie Parodies of the Day:

The Shiznit made an honest poster for The Big Short, seen below. Find more redone posters for this year’s big Oscar nominees at Uproxx.

Movie Mashup of the Day:

On Saturday Night Live, Adam Driver reprised his role as Kylo Ren for an hilarious sketch mashing Star Wars: The Force Awakens and the reality show Undercover Boss:

[embedded content]

Fan-Made Fashions of the Day:

Fashion illustrator Guillermo Meraz came up with some interesting haute couture outfits inspired by Star Wars characters. See more at Design Taxi.

Fan Theory of the Day:

Wouldn’t destroying the Death Star in Star Wars (and Return of the Jedi) have caused an economic crisis? The Film Theorists explore the theory:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Writer Emily Rose has a daughter who loves Rey so much, she’s constantly in cosplay and just received a hand-painted Star Wars mural from her mother:

Well that didn’t take long at all. Rey is reading Star Wars stories to Rey. pic.twitter.com/0JuN92QL6h

— Exorcising Emily (@exorcisingemily) January 16, 2016

Classic Cartoon of the Day:

Today is the 85th anniversary of the classic animated short Red Riding Hood, which is notable for its blatant rip-off of Walt Disney‘s Minnie Mouse. Watch the cartoon below.

[embedded content]

Alternate Universe Movie of the Day:

Here’s a trailer for Saving Private Ryan if Quentin Tarantino directed it:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

If you grew up in the 1980s, you’re going to love this creative montage of all your favorite movies (via One Perfect Shot):

[embedded content]

Celebrity Impersonator of the Day:

Ross Marquand might just be the most prolific celebrity impersonator since Rich Little, as you can see with his impressions of George Clooney, Brad Pitt and many others:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This week is the 15th anniversary of Donnie Darko premiering at the Sundance Film Festival. Watch the original trailer for the sci-fi film below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Arizona Tribes Wade Into The Water Business

3:55

Download

Rain and snow from El Nino are filling reservoirs in the West. But the weather isn’t ending questions about where cities will get water in years to come. One source could be Native American tribes.

Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Rain and snow from El Nino are filling reservoirs in the West this season, but that doesn’t end questions about where cities will get water in years to come. One source could be Native American tribes, as Will Stone of member station KJZZ reports.

WILL STONE, BYLINE: When settlers dammed the Gila River in the 1800s, the way of life for one of the South’s most enduring agricultural societies began to unravel.

DAVID DEJONG: It literally took the entire flow of the river.

STONE: David DeJong runs this construction project that will eventually carry water to growers across the Gila River Indian Community south of Phoenix.

DEJONG: In fact, there are recorded documents that indicate some of the off-reservation farmers intentionally wasted the water so that there would be no water down here on the reservation.

STONE: The river was woven into the tribe’s very identity, says DeJong.

DEJONG: In their own language, these are the Akimel O’odham, the river people.

STONE: Next to him, an irrigation canal empties water into the dry riverbed. It represents years of negotiations that resulted in a water settlement just over a decade ago, the largest in U.S. history at the time. And now the tribe is finally seeing the benefits. DeJong says soon, they expect the trees and wildlife that once lived along the river to return. And –

DEJONG: As importantly, the community is recharging water for future use.

STONE: Once water has seeped into the aquifer below, the community can then sell that valuable resource as credits to central Arizona cities.

STEPHEN ROE LEWIS: We’re really at a crossroads with our water settlement.

STONE: Stephen Roe Lewis is governor of the Gila River Indian Community. They’re entitled to more water from the parched Colorado River than anyone else in the region, but they still have to pay for it and the infrastructure. That’s expensive, so they’ve banded with a nearby utility to sell some of this banked water.

LEWIS: The marketing of our water credits and leasing, that’s going to be critical to the ongoing water supply in the future. That’s really going to be a driving economic force.

STONE: In other words, the committee pipes in the water, stores it up, and then sells it locally. Lewis believes the tribes will be major players in the water market in coming years. Like everyone, though, they are still subject to the realities of a water-stretched West. Daniel McCool is a professor at the University of Utah, and has authored books on the subject.

DANIEL MCCOOL: The tribes negotiated their settlement in this context of a Western water policy that’s really coming to an end.

STONE: Some western tribes have access to large supplies thanks to settlements. But with sources like the Colorado River over-allocated, he says some may be forced to renegotiate. As part of its settlement, the Gila River community already accepted certain restrictions on the marketing of water.

MCCOOL: A lot of people just hated the idea that a tribe might get a quantified amount of water and then open that up to the highest bidder because it would be western cities.

STONE: So water can only go to cities in Arizona, not, say, to Las Vegas or LA. Still, McCool believes their settlement was overall favorable. And ultimately, the tribe’s business plan is in the service of a greater cause, reviving the agrarian and cultural roots for the next generation – young farmers on the reservation like Cimarron Cabello and his wife, who inherited a modest plot of windswept desert.

CIMARRON CABELLO: We’re just trying to bring it back, I guess. Like the water’s coming back for the Gila River, we’ve got to bring the farming back and all.

STONE: In a year, they hope to have it in full production and more land on the way. That’s exactly what tribal governor Stephen Roe Lewis envisions as the Gila flows again.

LEWIS: When you actually can smell and taste the water firsthand, that shows that our sacred water is back and that we have a bright future ahead of us.

STONE: An economic reawakening on the reservation is what Lewis hopes for, fed by ancient traditions and a new entrepreneurial spirit. For NPR News, I’m Will Stone at the Gila River Indian Community.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Media Investigation Digs Into Reports Of Match-Fixing In Tennis

3:16

Download

High-ranking tennis players have been paid to lose, a BuzzFeed-BBC investigation finds. It alleges tennis authorities ignored reports of match-fixing, BuzzFeed’s John Templon tells NPR’s Ari Shapiro.

Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

A major investigative report today into crime, gambling and tennis – it involves billions of dollars, elite players, violent threats. The investigation was jointly reported by BuzzFeed News and the BBC. It alleges that tennis authorities have suppressed evidence of match-fixing and overlooked accusations against some of the sport’s top players. BuzzFeed’s John Templon joins us now. Welcome to the show.

JOHN TEMPLON: Hi. Thanks for having me.

SHAPIRO: This investigation began with a data analysis that you started more than a year ago. Describe what you did.

TEMPLON: Yeah. So I read in a statistics paper that about 1 percent of tennis matches were fixed, and I started looking on my own at different data to see if we could find suspicious trends in tennis matches. And so what I did is, I took those 26,000 tennis matches between 2009 and 2015 and looked at the movements in pre-match betting odds, and we looked for when those matches went against players and how often they lost. And for 15 players, we found interesting trends where it would happen less than 5 times in a 100. And then for four players in particular, we found that those trends, if the opening odds were correct, would occur less than 1 in 1,000 times. And so those were really suspicious, and we wanted to look more into them. And so then we started doing the deep document dive in the investigative reporting.

SHAPIRO: So after you’ve analyzed more than 20,000 matches, you get leaked documents basically confirming what the data showed. Give us a description of how this actually worked. You have crime syndicates from Italy and Russia going to players’ hotel rooms, offering them huge sums of money to throw a particular game.

TEMPLON: Yeah. So a number of players – and in fact, Novak Djokovic talked about that at the Australian Open after the report came out, that his support personnel have actually been approached about match-fixing. And he’s been offered $200,000 – is what he said he was offered at one particular tournament. And other players report that these sort of approaches happen a lot.

SHAPIRO: You don’t name names in this article, and many high-ranking tennis players today are urging you to do so. Why did you decide not to?

TEMPLON: Yeah. For a few reasons, actually. One of the reasons is that it’s difficult to prove match-fixing. We have seen questionable trends, and obviously the bookmakers think that what’s going on is very questionable for certain players. But we don’t necessarily know that those 16 players or anyone else in our universe was definitively fixing the matches. And the other reason is that ours is more of a call to action for the tennis authorities. We feel like they are kind of ignoring the problem. And the scope and scale where we can say that there are these 16 that are repeatedly showing up that are, you know, high-ranking players seems to make a stronger argument for that then just maybe naming one player.

SHAPIRO: Have you had any further response from tennis authorities since this came out?

TEMPLON: The tennis authorities have thus far basically said that they are doing as much as they can to combat match-fixing in tennis and that they’ll continue to be vigilant, but they haven’t really given a definitive response except to deny the article (laughter).

SHAPIRO: That’s BuzzFeed’s John Templon. His piece on widespread match-fixing by players in the top levels of tennis is called “The Tennis Racket.” Editor Heidi Blake is the co-author, and the story was jointly reported with BBC. Thank you.

TEMPLON: Thank you.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Lifesaving Flights Can Come With Life-Changing Bills

Amy Thomson holds 2-month-old Isla in Seattle Children's Hospital in early 2014. When the Thomson family learned Isla's heart was failing, they took an air ambulance from Butte, Mont., to Seattle to get medical care.
4:24

Download

Amy Thomson holds 2-month-old Isla in Seattle Children’s Hospital in early 2014. When the Thomson family learned Isla’s heart was failing, they took an air ambulance from Butte, Mont., to Seattle to get medical care. Courtesy of the Thomson family hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of the Thomson family

Butte is an old mining town, tucked away in the southwest corner of Montana with a population of about 34,000. Locals enjoy many things you can’t find elsewhere — campgrounds a quick drive from downtown and gorgeous mountain ranges nearby. But in Butte, as in much of rural America, advanced medical care is absent.

People in Butte who experience serious trauma or need specialty care rely on air ambulance flights to get them the help they need.

There were close to 3,000 air ambulance flights in Montana in 2014, and Amy Thomson was on one of them, curled up among the medical bags in the back of the fixed-wing plane. Her 2-month-old daughter, Isla, had a failing heart, and the hospital that could help her was 600 miles away.

“They did such wonderful care of her, and they tried to take great care of me, but in that moment I couldn’t let go,” Thomson says. “I was so afraid that if I closed my eyes that would be my last vision of her.”

Thomson watched as Isla was placed in a small box strapped to a gurney inside the air ambulance.

Seattle Children’s Hospital saved Isla’s life. Her family’s health insurance took care of the costs beyond her deductible — except for that critical air ambulance ride to Seattle.

The Thomsons read their insurance plan, and interpreted it to mean that any emergency medical transportation was covered.

Isla Thomson with her older sister. Isla turned 2 years old in November.

Isla Thomson with her older sister. Isla turned 2 years old in November. Courtesy of the Thomson family hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of the Thomson family

But it turns out, the air ambulance company was out of their network, and they got a bill for $56,000.

Thomson remembers looking at the bill and thinking, ” ‘You’ve got to be kidding me!’ Here is the flight that ultimately saved Isla’s life by getting her to where she needs to be. And yet is going to put us potentially in financial ruin. Or at least kill our future dreams as a family.”

When a patient needs an air ambulance, the first priority is getting them needed care as fast as possible. Patients don’t always know who is going to pick them up or if the ambulance is an in-network provider.

That can make a huge difference — and lead to huge bills.

“Of all the complaints we have received in our office, not one person was uninsured,” says Jesse Laslovich, legal counsel for Montana’s insurance commissioner. “They’re all insured. And they are frustrated as heck that they’re still getting $50,000 balance bills.”

States can regulate some medical aspects of air ambulances, but federal laws prevent states from limiting aviation rates, routes and services.

The cost of an air ambulance bill is split into two main parts, according to a study completed by the Montana Legislature. First, a liftoff fee, which ranges from $8,500 to $15,200 in Montana, plus a per-mile charge for the flight, which ranges from $26 to $133 a mile.

Some air ambulance companies offer membership programs as protection from big bills. For an annual fee of about $60 to $100, patients who use that company’s services face no cost beyond what their health insurance pays.

But, Laslovich says that doesn’t always work, because a patient can’t always know who is coming to pick them up.

“You want to know what my personal opinion is about what the problem is?” Laslovich asks. “It’s money.”

There is a lack of understanding about the actual costs of running an air ambulance business, says Rick Sherlock, the president of the Association of Air Medical Services. The costs include specialized labor, training, equipment and fuel.

“So those cost-drivers are there, and [it’s necessary] to maintain readiness to respond 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year,” Sherlock says.

He says some air ambulance companies remain out of insurance networks because they can’t always reach in-network deals that allow them to stay profitable.

“I think what you also have to look at is that negotiations between [air ambulance] companies and insurance companies take place when there’s good negotiations on both sides,” Sherlock says. “In situations where there may be only one or two insurance options in an area, it’s harder and harder to negotiate on a level playing field.”

There are only three health insurance companies operating in Montana, and at least 14 air ambulance providers. At the time of Isla’s trip to Seattle Children’s Hospital, the Thomsons’ insurer, PacificSource, had no in-network agreements with any air ambulance company in the family’s area. (PacificSource didn’t return calls seeking comment.)

For people who think they are protected from crippling health care bills because they have insurance, the cost of an ambulance ride can be a shock.

A Montana interim legislative committee is now investigating the wide range of pricing by air ambulance companies within the state. The state of Maryland has taken on a similar investigation.

In North Dakota an air ambulance company is suing the state for adding regulations on the industry.

Amy Thomson ended up not having to pay for her flight, but only after repeated appeals. According to Thomson, on the same day they were arranging a time to meet with a lawyer, she was notified by her insurance company that it would pay an additional amount of about $30,000, as well as the $13,000 out-of-network fee to the air ambulance company. The air ambulance firm waived the rest of its fee.

Isla turned 2 in November. She’s a healthy child with big blue eyes, but at times her mom still worries.

“Nobody takes a life flight for a joy ride,” she says. “You’re not going on Kayak.com and booking a life flight.”

Thomson didn’t think the flight should be free, but says the huge bill felt wrong. “I ethically believe this is a part of health care,” she says. “This is not some separate entity. There is something ethically wrong that these companies are profiteering off of people’s worst moments in their lives.”

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with Montana Public Radio and Kaiser Health News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.