Articles by admin

No Image

Exaggerator Pulls Off A Win At Preakness, Denying Nyquist's Triple Crown Bid

Exaggerator, with Kent Desormeaux aboard, moves past Nyquist during the Preakness Stakes on Saturday in Baltimore.

Exaggerator, with Kent Desormeaux aboard, moves past Nyquist during the Preakness Stakes on Saturday in Baltimore. Garry Jones/AP hide caption

toggle caption Garry Jones/AP

Exaggerator has taken home the second gem in horse racing’s triple crown. The colt won a mud-filled Preakness Stakes on Saturday, handing rival Nyquist the first loss of his career and ending his shot at a triple crown.

It wasn’t an easy win for Exaggerator, though. For much of the race, the colt trailed not only Nyquist but Uncle Lino, as well. As in the Kentucky Derby two weeks ago, Exaggerator mounted a last-minute bid to take the lead; unlike that last race, however, Exaggerator finished the job.

Nyquist entered the race as the favorite, with 3-5 odds, trailed by Stradivari and Exaggerator, whom he narrowly defeated at Churchill Downs two weeks ago. Nyquist — who’s named for the NHL’s Gustav Nyquist by his hockey fan owner — has now gone 8 for 9 in major races.

Rain came down for much of the day at Pimlico Race Course, just outside Baltimore. Still, Nyquist’s trainer, Dale Romans, betrayed no concern for the conditions in the lead-up to the race.

“My horse loves the mud,” Romans quipped to AL.com.

Yet it was Exaggerator — and his jockey, Kent Desormeaux — who emerged from the muck with the win.

Now, speculation surrounding a possible triple crown is also effectively silenced. With wins split between Nyquist and Exaggerator in the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness, respectively, American Pharoah remains assured of his status as the only horse to win a triple crown since 1978. The thoroughbred managed that achievement last year.

Next up on the schedule: the Belmont Stakes, which will be run on June 11.

The wet track at Pimlico Race Course was a mire of mud by the end of the day in Baltimore.

The wet track at Pimlico Race Course was a mire of mud by the end of the day in Baltimore. Eclipse Sportswire/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Eclipse Sportswire/Getty Images

Deaths In The Undercards

Dark notes sounded at the rain-soaked track earlier in the day, however. Two horses died within the first four undercard races at Pimlico, including one of the victors.

Homeboykris, a 9-year-old underdog gelding, won the day’s first race at long odds — but collapsed shortly after leaving the winner’s circle. Officials don’t yet know the horse’s cause of death, but his trainer, Francis Campitelli, told The Baltimore Sun he suspects it was a heart attack.

“They’re thinking at this point it was some sort of heart attack — you know, ruptured aorta or something like that,” Campitelli said of the horse, which had a long racing career behind him. He had finished 16th in the 2010 Kentucky Derby. “We won’t know until they do a necropsy on him, just to find out exactly what happened.”

Devastating loss. Homeboykris, died from apparent heart attack on walk back to barn after Preakness day win pic.twitter.com/AWuVCkh0Gg

— Chris Campitelli (@CampoTres) May 21, 2016

Not long after that, Pramedya, a 4-year-old filly, fractured her leg during the fourth race. The horse’s jockey, Daniel Centeno, also broke his clavicle in the accident. The horse was euthanized on the track.

It’s not the first tragedy for Pramedya’s owner. The Washington Post reports that Lael Stables also owned Barbaro, a former Kentucky Derby winner “who broke his right hind leg racing in the 2006 Preakness and died from complications from the injury in January of 2007.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

France Confirms Smoke Onboard Before EgyptAir Flight Crash

The investigation into the crash of EgyptAir flight 804 continues. Searchers have found wreckage and officials are seeking a cause.

Transcript

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

This is WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News. I’m Scott Simon. Investigators are collecting clues as what may have enfolded in the moments before the crash of an EgyptAir jet on Thursday. There are indications that smoke was detected on board just before the plane lost contact, but there’s still very little information about what may have caused that smoke. NPR’s Emily Harris is in Cairo. Emily, thanks for being with us.

EMILY HARRIS, BYLINE: Good morning, Scott.

SIMON: Where’d this information about the smoke come from?

HARRIS: This is data that was collected and sent to land during the flight automatically by an automatic transmission system. And the existence of these messages of trouble on the flight were first reported by a trade publication, Aviation Herald. And then it was confirmed by the French agency that investigates plane crashes this morning. Basically, it’s seven very brief notes. They’re sent over a three-minute period. Each one has its own timestamp, and so they show that they were sent right before the pilot and radar contact with the plane were lost.

SIMON: And what does that tell us? Or maybe I should say what might that tell us?

HARRIS: Well, it certainly might, but it does tell us that there were problems. That’s what this – those transmissions are for. It doesn’t tell us specifically what happened. The spokesperson for the French air accident investigation agency says the agency’s not drawing conclusions, although he also said, in general, the presence of smoke – if that’s indeed what it was – would mean the start of a fire. There were two messages identifying smoke in several places. There were other messages published by the Aviation Herald that noted problems with several windows. But officials say what they really need for a more complete picture are the voice cockpit and data flight recorders, which search crews are still looking for in the Mediterranean.

SIMON: Yeah. Smoke could also, as I understand – could also mean bits of debris or condensation, right?

HARRIS: It could mean bits of debris, dust. If it’s an optical type of smoke detector, it could mean different things.

SIMON: The first photos of some of that recovered wreckage are circulating now. They’ve been posted by the Egyptian military Facebook page. What do we see in those pictures?

HARRIS: Well, they’re photos of debris laid out on the deck of a navy ship that sat in the Mediterranean. And then the crews – they posted a video, too – go out in little rubber dinghies to pick up pieces from the ocean. There’s twisted pieces of the plane. One of them has the AirEgypt (ph) logo visible on it. Another picture shows ripped up seats. Another shows an unused life vest. It’s still, you know, flat, Scott, like they are when the flight attendants put them on and then pretend to blow into the little tubes.

SIMON: Yeah.

HARRIS: Egyptian officials say they’ve also recovered some human remains. And here in Cairo, people have been holding prayers and services for those who were on the plane. I went to one yesterday at a mosque where the imam explained right before the prayer that it’s the same prayer as if the body were there.

HARRIS: And what have we learned about some of the people who’ve been lost?

HARRIS: Their stories are coming out. I mean, you know, at first, we just knew the numbers. There were seven crew, three security staff, 56 passengers – and among those, a child and two infants. But they aren’t numbers, of course. They are people, and we’re learning who they are and how they happened to be on that plane and what they left behind.

Two, for example, where an Egyptian couple. A friend of theirs told me they were on a pleasure trip to Paris. Their two young children had stayed behind in Cairo, and their parents didn’t return. And then we’re starting to learn these personal details, but there’s still the big unanswered question – what happened? And then, depending on that answer, there’ll be more questions. The bottom line, of course, is where did our safety system for flying go wrong?

SIMON: NPR’s Emily Harris in Cairo. Thanks so much.

HARRIS: Thank you, Scott.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Best of the Week: Harley Quinn Got a Spinoff, We Broke Down the DC Movies Shakeup and More

The Important News

DC Delierium: Harley Quinn is getting a spinoff with more female DC characters.

Marvel Madness: Jeff Goldblum and Karl Urban joined Thor: Ragnarok. Michael Keaton is back to being a villain in Spider-Man: Homecoming.

X-Citement: Mr. Sinister might be the villain in Wolverine 3.

Bond Bonanza: Daniel Craig is reportedly done playing James Bond.

First Look: Fast 8 revealed a glimpse of Charlize Theron’s new villain role.

Remake Report: Jennifer Lawrence might be in the female Ocean’s Eleven reboot. Nicholas Winding Refn will redo Witchfinder General.

Franchise Fever: Dwayne Johnson is heading up a new Robert Ludlum cinematic universe franchise. Shane Black says the new Predator will be a detective movie.

Sequelitis: Tetris the Movie will be the first in a trilogy. Transformers 5 has been titled Transformers: The Last Knight. And Josh Duhamel is returning to the franchise.

New Directors, New Films: Emily Carmichael will direct a new Amblin movie for Steven Spielberg and Colin Trevorrow.

Casting Net: Helen Mirren will star in Winchester. Margot Robbie will co-star in Goodbye Christopher Robin. Dwayne Johnson will star in Doc Savage.

Box Office: Captain America: Civil War had another great weekend.

Festival Circuit: Cafe Society and The BFG were among the most talked about movies at Cannes. Neon Demon received mixed buzz at Cannes.

The Videos and Geek Stuff

New Movie Trailers: Ghostbusters, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows, Personal Shopper, The Purge: Election Year, Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping, Sausage Party, Loving, Indignation, Don’t Think Twice, Powerless and the Lethal Weapon TV show.

Behind the Scenes: The Conjuring 2, Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping and Finding Dory.

Watch: New Warcraft videos that help set up the movie.

Learn: Why Steven Spielberg thinks his sequels aren’t good.

Watch: Johnny Depp surprises Alice in Wonderland fans at Disneyland.

See: Ryan Gosling and Russell Crowe amusingly deal with their angry producer. And a cartoon version of The Nice Guys.

Watch: A profile on actor Oscar Isaac.

See: Margot Robbie pay homage to American Psycho.

Watch: An honest trailer for Wreck-it Ralph.

See: Classic ’80s records remade for X-Men: Apocalypse. And a commercial for Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters.

Watch: A short X-Men fan film about Storm.

See: Why the aliens in the Predator movies are the worst hunters.

Watch: A fake trailer for Drive 2: The Uber Years.

See: This week’s best movie posters.

Watch: A defense of Star Wars: The Force Awakens remixing the first movie.

Our Features

Comic Book Movie Guide: Exploring the undersea prison from Captain America: Civil War.

Geek Movie Guide: A list of geeky movies that didn’t need sequels.

Comic Book Movie Guide: A breakdown of the DC movies shakeup.

Home Viewing: Here’s our guide to everything hitting VOD this week. And here’s our guide to all the new indie and international films on video this month.

and

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Nigeria, You Win! Your Development Plan May Be The 'Best In History'

Lariat Alhassan had lots of great paint to sell but no office where she could meet clients. And then she heard an ad on the radio that seemed too good to be true.

Lariat Alhassan had lots of great paint to sell but no office where she could meet clients. And then she heard an ad on the radio that seemed too good to be true. Courtesy of Lariat Alhassan hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of Lariat Alhassan

In 2011, Lariat Alhassan had a business in Abuja, Nigeria. Larclux Paint was the name. She sold house paint. And industrial paint. Textured paint. Paint that fills in cracks in your walls. It was a paint company. But a really small one.

“The employee I had was just me. I was the production manager. I was the marketer. I was delivery person. I was everything,” says Alhassan, laughing. “Except the security.”

That was the company. A woman in her late 20s and a security guard watching over a factory space she rented to make the paint.

Customers liked her paint. They would try it out, and say “This seems great. I’d like to place a big order. We’ll come to your office to sign the papers,” she recalls. And that is when things would get awkward.

“I kept telling them, no, no, no. You call me and whenever you want, I’ll be there. I will just be there,” she says.

She didn’t have an office. Just her car. At this point the clients would often just back out. She couldn’t afford an office without more clients. She couldn’t get more clients without an office. She felt trapped. Stuck.

That was back in 2011. And then one day, she was at home listening to some music on the radio, when these ads came on. It seemed as if the radio was talking right to her, she recalled. It was for some sort of program to help small businesses.

“It may be small today but it won’t be after You Win! the youth enterprise and innovation competition,” said one ad. (You can hear it in the episode of Planet Money.)

The government was having a nationwide contest to give out US$58 million to young Nigerians trying to start or grow a small business,no experience necessary. Almost no strings attached. Just go to the website and sign up, said the ad.

Alhassan thought it was too good to be true.

“I just wanted to make sure I was safe and I wasn’t going to be conned” she said.

But it was no scam. The government really was giving away millions of dollars. Ngozi Okonjo Iweala, was the finance minister for Nigeria at the time. Her team set up the program. It was part of a massive nationwide plan to boost youth employment. About half of the young people didn’t have jobs, according to the World Bank.

“Everyone wants to run something, start their own business. Be their own boss,” says Iweala. “But the entrepreneurs often operate in an informal way. A lot of them are young people. And they want to expand their businesses but don’t know how.”

This is a problem around the world: How to get a small business to become a medium-size business that can become a big business. Because if you can figure out how to do that … you can make a dent in all kinds of other problems: unemployment, poverty. You name it. But in the developing world, small businesses rarely take off like that.

One problem is just money. In someplace like the United States, if you have a two-person paint company and need to rent out office space or warehouse space, you can just take out a small business loan.

In the developing world, in places like Nigeria, it is very hard to get that kind of loan. When a whole business is just a person with a trunk full of supplies, it is hard for lenders, like a bank or the government, to tell the good businesses from the bad ones. It is risky making those kinds of loans. So d small businesspeople can’t get loans.

The idea that Iweala and her team came up with to boost employment took all of this into account. It was a massive business contest the likes of which nobody in Nigeria had seen before. The amount of money they wanted to give away per person — roughly $50,000 — was out-of-this-world high. About 25 or 30 times the average annual income for a Nigerian at the time.

Iweala shopped the idea around the Nigerian government. People had all sorts of questions. How is the government going to decide which people to give the money to? And how will they make sure people don’t divert the funds to some other use?

Iweala and her team’s solution was to ask the entrants to submit a business plan: a few sheets of paper with an idea, maybe a chart or two, a budget. The government would read them all, pick the best ones and hand out the money.

Not everyone in the government was convinced that could work. Iweala remembers her colleagues saying things like, “These people have never written business plans.”It’s one thing if you say you’re going to invite 40 people, 50. But we’re talking [about] thousands.”

But Goodluck Jonathan, the president of Nigeria at the time, liked the idea right away. He gave it the greenlight.

There were still problems to confront. How do you pull something like this off in Nigeria — a country where trust in government is notoriously low.

People outside the government, the people who would to apply to the contest, also needed convincing. “They said, ‘Oh we’ve had so many government programs,’ and ‘It starts with promises and at the end of the day it’s never implemented,’ “says Iweala.

Then there was the worry that people running the contest would just give the money to friends and family. “That was the even bigger skepticism,” says Iweala.

So Iweala’s team had to make sure it was really clear how winners were getting picked … and who was doing the picking. For the initial review of applications they lined up graders from a local business school. And all the names of the applicants were removed before grading.

About 24,000 people applied to the contest, which was also supported by other federal ministries, the World Bank, the U.K.’s Department for International Development and Nigeria’s private sector.

For the second round, the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers was brought in to do part of the scoring. And the British Plymouth Business School did quality assurance. The applicants knew all of these checks and balances were in place, which upped their trust.

But that still left the hard question, how to score it Who were the best candidates to get the money? Was it the very best, or would that be wasted money because those people might succeed anyway and not need the money? And how could you tell the difference between the 1,200th and the 1,201st candidate in any meaningful way?

This is where they reached out to a researcher at the World Bank. “I typically come in when people have an idea and they want to know if it will work,” says David McKenzie.

At this point, in mid-2011, Iweala wanted to launch the program in two months. McKenzie met with a few team members in in the cafe of the J building at the World Bank in Washington, D.C. to hash out ways to grade the entrants and measure the results.

One idea was to just rank every entry and pick the best. From his research, McKenzie suggested a different course of action: Pick the winners somewhat randomly Sure you can look at the business plans and pick out the very best. And the very worst. Those are usually obvious. But after you have the outliers, he argued, just make it luck of the draw. It’ll save a lot of trouble.

Plus if you do it randomly, you can measure the impact of winning by looking at the control group of non-winners, says McKenzie.

That was the plan.

They gave the contest the name: the YouWiN! Competition. And in late 2011, they started getting the word out. With ads, lots and lots of ads – in print, on TV and on the radio.

And that’s how Alhassan, the paint seller, came to hear an ad for YouWiN! coming out of her bedside radio that day.

“Lots of people did not believe it,” she says. But after hearing it a second and a third time, she said to herself: “Lariat, why don’t you pick up this opportunity? Try. Try, and see if it will work out for you.”

She took out her old laptop, plugged in her modem and went online and applied. A little while later she was one of the 6,000 invited to the next round. Where everyone would write their business plans.

The government provided some help. The applicants were invited to four day trainings held around the country. When Alhassan describes it, she said it felt like thousands of people packing into something like a concert hall. There were all kinds of applicants: A baker without enough machinery. A chicken farmer thinking of expanding to catfish and snails. Someone trying to start a computer school. Musicians. Dentists. People will all kinds of business plans.

“Boy it was intense. From morning to evening,” says Alhassan. But they did get lunch. “And breakfast,” she says, laughing.

Then she was asked to take what she just learned and write up a formal business plan. This was the real test. The real competition.

She sent it in and went home to wait. A little while later she got an email. Congratulations, it said.

“I felt I couldn’t even control my emotions. I started jumping on my bed,” she says. “My sister said what is wrong with you, have you won the lottery? I said yes. Yes. Yes.”

Alhassan got 10 million Naira, for her business — equivalent to $65,000.

She brought on marketers. Salespeople. She bought them a car to get around, to get the word out. She got a truck for deliveries so it wasn’t all out of her own trunk anymore. And she rented a proper office and a showroom. She decorated it with furniture she could be proud of.

“I can confidently say [to customers] now, ‘Please come to my office. You can come here. What time? I’ll be ready for you. I’ll be waiting for you,” she says.

Well, you might look at this and say, of course she was able to do this. She was given $65,000 — and it wasn’t even a loan.

The real question is how her business does down the road — and all the other businesses as well, from the dentists to the chicken farmer who wants to expand into catfish. Was it worth it for the government? Did it create jobs?

The World Bank analyzed the YouWiN! Competition impact over three years and published a report a few months ago.

The report looked at the 1,200 winners of the contest and found they had created 7,000 jobs, real jobs that stuck around three years later. The competition cost $60 million to run. So that means each job cost about $8,500 to create, a way cheaper investment than any other program studied in the report.

Chris Blattman, an economist at Columbia University who researches poverty and global development, thinks the results are pretty remarkable.

“I remember reading it [and] my eyes [kept] kind of popping out of my head,” he says. The thing that stood out to him most was that the winners, as a group, seemed to use the money pretty well. They didn’t waste it. He says it was easier than expected to find small businesses that could use a big pile of cash to grow. Maybe way more people are constrained by not having enough capital than we think.

Nigeria has had two more rounds of the YouWiN! Competition. The latest round had more than 100,000 applicants and 1,500 winners.

As good as the first round was, 7,000 new jobs is still a small number in a country of 170 million people. It’s clearly not going to solve the problem of unemployment.

But Blattman says, these results are extremely promising. So promising he wrote a euphoric blog post in October with the title: “Is This The Most Effective Development Program In History?”

But is it?

He stresses the question mark at the end of the title. It may not really be the best in history, he says, but he’s quick to add: “It’s probably the best I’ve seen so far. In history, it’s the best one we’ve measured.”

That’s something, considering that in so many cases of job creation programs, nobody measures the results at all.

Big thanks to Jeff Mosenkis at the Institute for Poverty Action for all the help behind the scenes on this story.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Oklahoma Governor Vetoes Bill That Would Criminalize Performing Abortions

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin vetoed a controversial abortion bill Friday. The measure would have made it a felony for doctors to perform abortions.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Late today, the governor of Oklahoma did something she’s never done before. She vetoed an abortion bill. Republican governor Mary Fallin describes herself as the most pro-life governor in the nation. She’s signed 18 anti-abortion laws. But this latest one even she agreed would’ve been struck down by the courts.

We’re joined now by reporter Rachel Hubbard of member station KOSU in Oklahoma City. And Rachel, first just tell us about the bill and what made it specifically controversial.

RACHEL HUBBARD, BYLINE: Well, Audie, let me just read part of the bill. And I’m quoting here. (Reading) No person shall perform an abortion upon a pregnant woman. A person that violates this section shall be guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not less than one year in the state penitentiary.

And that bill goes on to say any physician that does perform an abortion won’t be able to renew a medical license or ever get one again in the state of Oklahoma. And as you can imagine, some doctors in the state weren’t too happy about this. Doug Cox is a physician who says criminalizing doctors is outrageous.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

DOUG COX: As a physician, I’ve dealt with things that the Legislature never deals with – real-life conversations that take place behind closed doors. And I resent the Legislature trying to step in and interfere, put the government standing between me and my patients.

HUBBARD: Now, Audie, here’s the thing about Doug Cox. Not only is he a doctor. He’s also a Republican lawmaker who serves in the State House. He describes himself as pro-life and says he’s never performed an abortion he doesn’t plan to. But he was still against this bill.

CORNISH: So help us understand how this bill got passed by the Republican-led legislature in Oklahoma.

HUBBARD: Well, Oklahoma is a super conservative, very pro-God, very pro-gun state, and they really value state’s rights. People here just don’t like anybody to tell them what to do. One of the authors of the bill is State Representative David Brumbaugh. He says since the Legislature approved this bill yesterday, there’s been a frenzy and frankly a misunderstanding. He says the bill is about licensing, and licensing of physicians is a state’s right, he says.

DAVID BRUMBAUGH: We’re trying to, you know, weather this storm by doing the right things because it’s not a federal issue. It’s a state issue. And the state has an interest in the public safety and health of its citizens, and that’s what this bill’s about.

HUBBARD: Now, Audie, the Center for Reproduction Rights was quick to weigh in on this bill when it passed yesterday. It’s sued Oklahoma eight times over its abortion laws in the past few years and has threatened to do so again if the governor had signed the bill.

CORNISH: Now, why did governor Fallin decide to veto this abortion bill? As we said, this not something she’d been known to do.

HUBBARD: Right. The governor released as statement this afternoon after she vetoed the bill. She didn’t disagree with the principle of making abortion illegal. In her carefully worded message, she said two things. One – the definition of a felony was so vague that it couldn’t withstand a constitutional legal challenge. And second was that she does support a reexamination of the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision of Roe versus Wade which legalized abortion, but she conceded that this legislation just couldn’t accomplish that, saying only the appointment of a conservation pro-life justice to the U.S. Supreme Court could get that done.

CORNISH: So what happens next?

HUBBARD: Well, the Oklahoma Legislature can try to override the veto, but that’s not likely to happen. It really didn’t have a lot of support in the House of Representatives initially. Some 30 lawmakers abstained from the first vote. And the Oklahoma Legislature is winding down anyway. It ends a week from today. There’s still no budget. They’re likely headed to a special session. So we’ll have to wait and see if this bill makes a return appearance.

CORNISH: That’s Rachel Hubbard of member station KOSU. She joined us from Oklahoma City. Thanks so much.

HUBBARD: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Poll Finds Most Native Americans Aren't Offended By Redskins Name

NPR’s Audie Cornish talks to Washington Post reporter John Woodrow Cox about his paper’s poll that shows 9 out of 10 Native Americans aren’t offended by the name of the Washington football team.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

A new poll from The Washington Post finds that a vast majority of Native Americans they surveyed aren’t offended by the name of Washington’s NFL team, the Redskins. Five-hundred-and-four self-identified Native Americans across the country took part. It’s getting a lot of attention because, over the last few years, there’s been a vocal campaign to change the name of the team. I spoke with Washington Post reporter John Woodrow Cox about it.

JOHN WOODROW COX: The key question was one written, actually, into the Annenberg – the famous Annenberg poll from 2004 that basically asked people if they were offended by the Washington Redskins’ name. We wanted to understand if Native Americans’ opinions had changed over time, over the past twelve years, because that poll has been very controversial. It’s been used quite a bit by the team as justification for keeping the name. So we replicated that question exactly. That was the first question. And only 1 in 10 of Native Americans we asked that question to said, in fact, that they were offended by the name.

CORNISH: Tell us a little more about what people had to say because I know that you guys actually did some follow-up calls to find out their opinions.

COX: We did, yeah. It was really fascinating. One of the more memorable people I talked to was a man by the name of Charles Moore (ph). He’s a member of the Oneida tribe of Wisconsin, which is related to the New York Oneida tribe that has fought this. He’s 73 years old. He’s a physician. And he was somebody who said that he understood why people had an issue with the name, why they were offended by it, but that he didn’t at all and that he looked at it as a very low priority, that among the things that Native Americans were struggling with, that was not anywhere near the top of his list. And he even argued that the National Football League has bigger problems than the name of this team. Others have said the same. I talked to a woman in North Dakota by the name of Barbara Bruce (ph). She’s 70 years old, and she’s been a teacher for four decades. And she said that she liked the name. She saw it as something to be proud of.

CORNISH: Reaction from the team owner Dan Snyder in a statement – he said, we’re gratified by this overwhelming support from the Native American community, and the team will proudly carry the Redskins name. What do you make of that read of this poll?

COX: I think that’s a stretch. We didn’t ask people if they supported the name. Certainly in our anecdotal follow-up interviews, there were people who said they felt honored. Some people said that native imagery in sports at least represented them in some ways in a society where they often felt overlooked. But that was all anecdotal. I think to say that Native Americans support the name – that’s not something, certainly, that our poll asked or found.

CORNISH: Critics of your survey say that it doesn’t change the debate. And I want to get your opinion on that. I mean, what does this do? Is this suddenly a non-offensive term?

COX: I think that the debate won’t end with this at all. I think that the people who’ve been working on this for decades are going to continue to fight. Suzan Harjo has been fighting this since the 1960s. I don’t think she’s going to stop, and nor do I think the Oneida Indian Nation or the National Congress of American Indians – I don’t think any of those groups are going to stop. And they’ve – they’ve argued, too, that the dictionary defines this as a racial slur. And I’ve also, you know, heard people argue that, regardless of the number of Native Americans who are offended, they’ve said that well, isn’t it enough that 1 in 10 are offended? That’s certainly one of the arguments that they’ve made. So I don’t expect the poll to end the debate.

CORNISH: John Woodrow Cox of The Washington Post, Thank you so much for speaking with us.

COX: Thank you.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters Commercial, 'Drive 2' Trailer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Fake Commercial of the Day:

How does Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters get so full in X-Men: Apocalypse? With this 1983 recruitment ad starring Jubilee and the voice of Stan Lee:

[embedded content]

Character History of the Day:

In anticipation of his return in X-Men: Apocalypse, here’s a look at the evolution of Wolverine in movies and TV:

[embedded content]

Movie Tribute of the Day:

Hugh “Wolverine” Jackman recognizes this week’s Top Gun anniversary with a photo of him and his jet:

In honor of the 30th Anniversary of the move Top Gun and, of course, the all important #TBT – call sign WOLVERINE pic.twitter.com/IiqDLSumHe

— Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman) May 19, 2016

Fake Sequel of the Day:

This fake trailer for Drive 2: The Uber Years is good comedy made great with the casting of a Ryan Gosling doppelganger (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Fake Cartoon of the Day:

The Nice Guys got a pretend animated series spinoff done in the style of 1970s cartoons:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Nora Ephron, who would have turned 75 today, directs Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks on the set of You’ve Got Mail in 1998:

Mashup of the Day:

Sansa from Game of Thrones gets a cool Kill Bill style poster in this art by Darth Blender:

The North Remembers #KillBill #GameofThrones #Tarantino #SansaStark pic.twitter.com/7qypaQWTVV

— Darth Blender (@darth_blender) May 19, 2016

Movie Science of the Day:

Kyle Hill of the Nerdist show Because Science explains how Ant-Man makes his big transformation in Captain America: Civil War:

[embedded content]

Reimagined Character of the Day:

See what Yoda looks like after he’s turned to the Dark Side in this fan art by Daryl Mandryk (via Geek Tyrant):

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 40th anniversary of the release of The Missouri Breaks, starring Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson. Watch the original trailer that promised history would be made when it opens:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

#5DollarChallenge: We Mapped Out The Best Meals You Can Buy For Five Bucks Or Less

Check out the #5dollarchallenge map from Youth Radio

toggle caption Youth Radio

Young people want meals that are quick — and also fresh and healthful and interesting.

But can they get all of that for less than five bucks?

Three weeks ago, Youth Radio and NPR asked you to send in pictures of the best meals you can purchase for five bucks or less.

Based on the submissions to the #5dollarchallenge, we’re happy to report that a Lincoln can indeed buy quite a lot of deliciousness.

Check out Youth Radio’s interactive map for some of your favorite meals from every region of the U.S.

While we applaud those of you who sent in photos of meals you prepared at home with ingredients that cost less than $5, for this map, we chose pre-made meals you can pick up on the fly.

These weren’t necessarily healthful meals, though lots of you sent in cheap vegetarian options — which isn’t surprising. I’m vegetarian, and whether I’m buying a burrito or a burger, I usually end up paying less than my meat-eating friends.

@youthradio My fav cheap lunch! Veggie bagel @ Aroma/Oakland. $4.11 if I don’t do cookie splurge! #5DollarChallenge pic.twitter.com/FO41V4dfUm

— Rebecca Martin (@rebm) May 5, 2016

But people sent in plenty of meaty submissions as well. Alongside all that meat, we also got a lot of burgers, burritos and pizza, which means: bread, bread, bread! Especially since gluten-free meals are a huge trend right now, it was interesting to see so many carb-heavy options.

On the lighter side, many prepared salads came from grocery stores. This illustrates the “groceraunt” trend — more supermarkets are offering meals we typically expect from sit-down eateries.

Hey @youthradio I got this breathtaking Peking duck sandwich at Vanessa’s in NYC Chinatown for $3 #5dollarchallenge pic.twitter.com/Ro4MuFODrT

— Monica Eng (@monicaeng) May 9, 2016

There were a handful of breakfast options, consisting of the usual suspects: eggs, bacon and toast.

Some of the most appetizing-looking submissions were foods with origins outside the U.S.: tacos, tikka masala, sushi, fried rice and bahn mi sandwiches. These were some of the heartiest meals available at reduced costs.

However, very few submissions included a beverage. Five bucks can buy a range of food, but this tight budget may leave some of you thirsty. (Of course, tap water is often free.)

A nice Kale & Broccoli salad kit from #TraderJoes for $2.49. @youthradio #5dollarchallenge @TraderJoesBest pic.twitter.com/1Fz4Kz81uS

— Emily Eldridge (@eldrideg) May 4, 2016

Thanks to all who participated in the #5dollarchallenge! And let us know if we left any of your favorite cheap meals off the map on Twitter — tag @youthradio and @NPRFood.


Kasey Saeturn is a reporter with Youth Radio, which produced this story as part of its series Fast Food Scramble with NPR’s Sonari Glinton.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

For John Holland, Breaking Into The NBA Came Down To One Shot

The odds are stacked against any minor league basketball player trying to make the NBA. But one remarkable, contested shot helped pave the way for a player named John Holland.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

It’s playoff time in the NBA, a league of millionaires where even the lowest-paid benchwarmer earns more than $500,000 a season. Hundreds of players are striving to break in, grinding away in the trenches of minor league basketball. It’s called the D-League – D for Development.

We followed the Canton Charge this season. NPR’s Uri Berliner explores the impact of a single play on the team’s fortunes and one player’s career.

URI BERLINER, BYLINE: It’s a long shot, this D-League thing, especially for players who never got drafted, like John Holland. Holland grew up in the Bronx. And in high school, he was on an academic track, not a straight path to professional basketball.

JOHN HOLLAND: Coming out of high school, I didn’t really have any offers – Division I offers.

BERLINER: Really.

HOLLAND: I was good. I thought I was good, but…

(LAUGHTER)

HOLLAND: Nobody else really on the Division I level thought I was good enough.

BERLINER: So he played for Boston University, hardly a basketball powerhouse. After college, he signed on with pro teams in France, Spain and Turkey. He made six figures, but that didn’t get him any closer to the NBA. So now at age 27, he’s in an apartment just outside of Canton, Ohio, taking a big chance on a single season, a season where he’s making $19,000.

HOLLAND: Sometimes it’s about more than money. It’s about the dream, you know? This year, this is what it’s about. This is the grind – chasing the dream.

BERLINER: The first time I meet Holland is one of those unglamorous moments. A Canton teammate – Mike Dunigan – has come over to make dinner and watch a game with Holland and his roommate. But before Dunigan will make the pasta, there’s this mess in the sink.

MIKE DUNIGAN: Yo, Man, these dishes ain’t clean, Bro. You got to wash these dishes or something, Bro. I ain’t going to be cooking and washing dishes.

BERLINER: The task falls to Holland. The next day, I catch up with Holland at practice. Only a small fraction of D-League players get NBA call ups, and for players at his position, the competition is fierce.

HOLLAND: I’m a guard – dime a dozen. We’ll see what happens when it’s all said and done.

BERLINER: As the season winds down, just one of his teammates gets a call up – a guy with previous NBA experience. Holland’s a bit under the radar – not the highest scorer on the team. But he’s consistently good, helping Canton to a 12-game winning streak and a spot in the D-League playoffs. We’re in Portland, Maine, for game two in playoff series against the Red Claws.

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #1: Number 10, guard, 6-5 from Boston University – John Holland.

BERLINER: The game’s close throughout. Holland makes two crucial three-point shots to keep Canton’s chances alive – and then this play with Canton up by one and less than a minute to go.

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #2: Cook running the clock down, now drives in, spins, spins back the other way, kicks it outside to Holland, fakes the three, one on the shot clock, has to take a contested throw. And he nailed it.

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #3: Oh, my word.

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #2: What a shot.

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #3: Unbelievable shot.

BERLINER: That shot seals the game for Canton and clinches the playoff series against the Red Claws, the Boston Celtics’ D-League team. And in the locker room after the game, Holland finds himself the center of attention. He gets a shout out from assistant coach Damon Jones who had a reputation for making big shots in the NBA.

DAMON JONES: You are now officially a part of the family.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Hey.

JONES: You are now an honorary Jones. Your name is John Jones.

(LAUGHTER, CROSSTALK)

BERLINER: Later, I ask Holland to relive the shot.

HOLLAND: It felt good when I released it, and it was an amazing shot, an amazing moment, one that I’m going to remember forever now (laughter).

BERLINER: I mean, that shot could have changed your life.

HOLLAND: Yeah, it definitely could have. It definitely could have, but…

BERLINER: So many things could’ve knocked Holland off stride. The game’s on the line. The 24-second clock is ticking down to zero. The defender who’s 6-foot-7 and a former Celtic is draped all over him.

HOLLAND: Maybe he’ll jump, but he didn’t jump. And he closed out on me hard.

BERLINER: There’s no other option now. He has to shoot. Holland goes straight up, and the high-arcing shot falls through the net. Three days after that shot, as he’s about to take a nap, Holland gets a life-changing call from his agent. He’s going to the NBA. I meet up with Holland a few days later.

So tell me what you’re wearing right now. What’s that say?

HOLLAND: Oh, this is just a practice shirt – says Boston Basketball.

BERLINER: Boston Celtics Basketball.

HOLLAND: Boston Celtics Basketball.

BERLINER: We’re in a hallway in TD Garden a few hours before his second game with the Celtics. Holland’s called up for the last two games of the regular season and the playoffs. He makes $25,000, more than his salary with Canton for the entire D-League season.

In the NBA, you get paid even if you’re not in uniform. And tonight, Holland’s on the bench in street clothes. After the game, as we walk through the same hallway, Holland’s absorbing exactly what happened. The call up couldn’t have come at a better time.

You’re 27, right?

HOLLAND: Yes.

BERLINER: So this was the year for you to make a move?

HOLLAND: Yeah, this was it. This was it. I mean, basketball – life is short.

BERLINER: Holland’s going back to his hotel and offers to give me a ride. And we climb into the car the Celtics have given him to use – a really nice car.

Is this a rental?

HOLLAND: Yeah. Life is different. I mean, they got it for me.

BERLINER: Driving a Mercedes – they got it for him.

HOLLAND: Yeah.

BERLINER: The Celtics wind up losing in the first round of the playoffs, and Holland barely gets on the court. He plays a grand total of one minute. But next season, John Holland has the chance to turn that one NBA minute into many. Uri Berliner, NPR News.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Health Departments Cut Programs While Awaiting Zika Funding

A mosquito control inspector sprinkles larvicide in a storm drain in Miami Gardens, Fla., in an effort to stop the spread of Zika virus.

A mosquito control inspector sprinkles larvicide in a storm drain in Miami Gardens, Fla., in an effort to stop the spread of Zika virus. Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Joe Raedle/Getty Images

While Congress fidgets over whether and how to pay for the fight against the Zika virus, state and local health departments are scrambling and slimming down.

That’s because these front-line public health agencies have already seen their budgets chopped because of the debate.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in April cut $44 million from its fund that helps state and local governments prepare for public health emergencies. It was part of the $589 million the White House moved from other programs – mostly money allocated for domestic and international responses to the Ebola virus – to combat Zika as it awaited action on Capitol Hill.

New York City’s health department lost $1.1 million in the deal.

Marisa Raphael, the deputy commissioner in New York’s Office of Emergency Preparedness and Response, says she expects to have to cut jobs.

“We depend on this grant to create an infrastructure for our preparedness and our response,” Raphael tells Shots. “That’s everything from our lab staff to our surveillance staff, so when we have this cut, that does immediately impact our capabilities.”

New York isn’t unique. A survey of state and local health departments shows that many are struggling with the reduced funding. About a third of state health departments say they expect to lay people off, and the same number say they’ll likely eliminate training programs.

The cuts will affect the kinds of things these departments normally do.

“A new measles outbreak? That’s the job of the health department to discover and to control,” says Thomas Inglesby, the CEO of the Center for Health Safety at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “Or a new mumps outbreak on a college campus, or a meningitis outbreak. That’s the day-in, day-out work of public health.”

He says public health department budgets have been slashed over the last 10 years and they just don’t have excess resources or people that can be cut.

“If you take funding from local health department preparedness that means people are fired or labs can’t run the same way or disease surveillance has to stop,” he says. “If we take people from those jobs to work on Zika, that will help with Zika, but that will hurt our other preparedness efforts.”

President Obama in February made an emergency request of $1.9 billion to combat the Zika virus. The money would be used for research into a new vaccine, treatments and tests for the disease as well as to study and track how it spreads and try to control the population of mosquitoes that carry the virus.

Scientists agree that the Zika virus is linked to microcephaly, a condition in which babies are born with undersized brains and skulls. It is also linked to several other types of birth defects, and to Guillain-Barre syndrome in adults.

The House of Representatives this week passed a bill allocating $622 million for Zika response, about a third of the president’s request. And all of the money comes from other programs.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Kentucky, argued at a recent markup that the emergency money was a stopgap until Congress could allocate more money as part of the regular budget process.

The Senate is working on a separate bill that would provide $1.1 billion in new money for the disease.

Public health experts argue that three months is a long time to wait for what many say is an impending public health emergency.

And since Zika is just the latest in a string of infectious disease threats, many public health experts want to create a standing fund for public health emergencies.

Such a fund could operate like the one maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The agency can draw on it as needed in an emergency; it would be replenished in the regular government budgeting process.

Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, and Thomas Frieden, the director of the CDC, advocated for such a fund in recent weeks.

“The whole idea is to have funding available urgently when it is needed urgently,” says Melinda Moore, associate director of the Population Health Program at the Rand Corporation.

She says FEMA money is “available as soon as it’s needed, right on the heels of a hurricane, a tornado, et cetera. Some of these outbreaks — and Zika is a good example — are nearly as urgent as that.”

Inglesby agrees that an emergency fund would eliminate these repeated budget fights.

But for Zika that debate is too late, he says. Congress should allocate emergency money for Zika now and then treat is as a regular part of our public health landscape.

“Zika is the new normal,” Inglesby says. “Zika is something we’re going to have to deal with not just this summer, but next summer and the summer after that.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)