Articles by admin

No Image

U.S. Prepares To Face The Netherlands In Women’s World Cup Final

The U.S. will face the Netherlands in the Women’s World Cup Final on Sunday. The U.S. women are the defending champs and looking to secure their fourth World Cup title.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

On Sunday, soccer fans will be watching the final game in what has been a thrilling Women’s World Cup, especially thrilling if you are a United States fan. The defending champion U.S. team plays the Netherlands. This is the Americans’ third straight World Cup final, and they are going for a record fourth title. The Dutch meanwhile have never gotten this far in the tournament.

NPR sports correspondent Tom Goldman joins us now to talk about the Women’s World Cup and what to expect this weekend. Hey, Tom.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: Hi, Mary Louise.

KELLY: So safe to say the U.S. is the favorite going into this game. Why are they so darn good?

GOLDMAN: Yeah, very safe to say. They have an incredibly deep lineup. They beat a very good English team in the semifinals without the star who has carried them through the knockout round, the lavender-haired Megan Rapinoe. She was out with a hamstring injury for that game.

KELLY: Yeah, is she going to be back for the final, by the way?

GOLDMAN: You know, she says she will – so fingers crossed on that.

KELLY: OK.

GOLDMAN: Then, you know, you have players like Carli Lloyd, Christen Press, Mallory Pugh, outstanding players who could start for most other teams. They haven’t regularly been in the U.S. starting lineup. And on top of that, you’ve got the firepower – great attacking scoring forwards. Alex Morgan is tied for the scoring lead in the tournament. The U.S. has scored early in all of its games, so the Americans have put opponents back on their heels early.

And of course the U.S. defense has been stout when it’s needed to be. Goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher had a number of game-changing saves against England – so just a few reasons, Mary Louise, why this is a heck of a formidable group.

KELLY: Yeah, good offense, good defense – and tell us about their opponent, the Netherlands team. How are they shaping up?

GOLDMAN: Yeah – very good team. Obviously you have to be to get this far. They are the reigning European champions. And most of that championship team from 2017 is playing on this World Cup squad. So there’s continuity. There’s familiarity, and that helps a lot.

KELLY: Experience, sure.

GOLDMAN: Yeah, and specifically they have a trio of attacking forwards who make the Dutch a very exciting team. And I am going to pronounce their names effortlessly for you or at least attempt to.

KELLY: (Laughter) OK, go.

GOLDMAN: We have Vivianne Miedema. We have Lieke Martens. And we have Shanice Van de Sanden. So they…

KELLY: Flawless. I love it.

GOLDMAN: Almost flawless.

KELLY: Yes.

GOLDMAN: A little hitch on that last one. A potent group of scorers although their attacking style of play also could lead to problems for them. If the U.S. defense is on form, it could leave Holland vulnerable to counterattacks.

KELLY: Now, meanwhile, a little controversy brewing – which is that as exciting as this match you’ve persuaded me is going to be on Sunday, it’s not the only big soccer match happening on Sunday, which is prompting some questions, I gather, from the women’s team about having to share the spotlight. What’s going on?

GOLDMAN: Yeah, that’s right. You have the Copa America final matching the top teams in South America. You have the CONCACAF Gold Cup final also on Sunday. Now, that’s normally a great matchup between the U.S. men and Mexico archrivals. Kudos to the U.S. men, by the way. They’ve not had the same international success as the women, and it’s good for them to be in a final like this.

But Rapinoe in particular was outspoken about her disappointment that there’s this confluence of events. The women play at 11 a.m. Eastern on Sunday. The other finals are later in the day – so no overlap. But Rapinoe, you know, puts this in a larger context of the women always having to scrap for more money, better working conditions. And it’s her strong belief that this is just another slap.

KELLY: All right, lots of soccer, lots of play coming on Sunday. That’s NPR’s Tom Goldman. Thank you.

GOLDMAN: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Doctors Slow To Adopt Tech Tools That Might Save Patients Money On Drugs

Physicians complain that there’s not yet a standard drug-pricing tool available to them that includes the range of medicine prices each of their patients might face — one that takes into account their particular pharmacy choice and health insurance plan.

Exdez/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Exdez/Getty Images

When Mary Kay Gilbert saw her doctor in May for a skin infection on her leg, she wasn’t surprised to receive a prescription for an antibiotic cream.

But Gilbert, 54, a nurse and health consultant, was shocked when her physician clicked on the desktop computer and told Gilbert the medicine would cost $30 on her Blue Cross and Blue Shield plan.

“I was like, ‘Wow — that’s pretty cool that you know that information,’ ” she recalled telling the doctor in Edina, Minn.

Allina Health, the large Minnesota-based hospital network Gilbert’s doctor belongs to, is one of a growing number of health systems and insurers providing real-time drug pricing information to physicians so they can help patients avoid “sticker shock” at the pharmacy.

The pricing tool, which is embedded in each participating physician’s electronic health records and prescribing system, shows how much patients can expect to pay out of pocket, based on their insurance and the pharmacy they choose.

It also allows the doctor to find a cheaper alternative, when possible, and start the process of getting authorization for a drug, if the insurer requires that.

The soaring cost of drugs has been front and center in the growing national debate about revamping U.S. health care.

Patients abandon hundreds of thousands of prescriptions each year at the pharmacy, often because of high prices. Studies show that can jeopardize their health and often lead to higher costs down the road.

Such a tool can help consumers — many of whom are also facing increasing copayments and higher deductibles — learn about cheaper options in the doctor’s office.

Still, doctors have been slow to adopt the technology, sometimes because of concerns about getting bogged down in long discussions about drug costs. Humana, for example, introduced its drug pricing tool to its network of doctors in 2015. Today, fewer than 10% are using it, according to Humana officials.

These sorts of pricing tools do have serious limitations. Because price negotiations among insurers, drugmakers and middlemen are often highly competitive and secretive, the tools often don’t have useful data for every patient.

For example, Allina’s works for only about half its patients. The company says that’s because not all pharmacy benefit managers share their data on health plan enrollee costs, and those that do often provide only a fraction of their information.

“It’s a chicken-and-egg thing where doctors don’t use it because they don’t have the data for all their patients, and health plans don’t promote it to physicians because doctors don’t have the technology in place,” says Anthony Schueth, a health information technology consultant in Jacksonville, Fla. “It can be a powerful tool when it works, but at the moment the drivers are not there across the board for widespread adoption.”

At a hearing last month, Sen. Martha McSally, R-Ariz, pressed a top Trump administration health official about why many patients lack access to information on prescription drug prices at their doctor’s office.

“This is America. Why can’t we have this tool available now?” she asked. “The data is out there; the information is out there. What is it going to take to make this happen?”

The technology got a boost last month when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandated that all Medicare drug plans embed such a tool in their doctors’ electronic prescribing system starting in 2021.

The details of what consumers spend out of pocket for drugs is provided by pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs. They are the middlemen who negotiate with drugmakers on the prices insurers will pay for the medications and which ones the insurers will cover. So a tool’s usefulness is undermined when key PBMs are not included in the listings.

For example, a drug pricing tool sold by Surescripts, which is owned partly by the PBMs CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, includes data from those companies, but not from OptumRx, a PBM owned by insurance titan UnitedHealth. And the OptumRx drug pricing tool includes Optum data but not that of Express Scripts and CVS.

Demetrios Kouzoukas, who heads the Medicare program for CMS, says he hopes the program’s new drug mandate will spark the industry to provide doctors and patients access to a standard pricing tool, regardless of their insurance.

“What we are hoping and expecting is that there will be a standard that’s developed by the industry … so that the tool is available in all the electronic health records, for all the doctors and all patients, and spreads even beyond Medicare,” he told McSally at the hearing.

But cooperation does not seem to be on the horizon, some health industry officials say.

“I don’t see any chance that there will be a centralized system that will connect all of the plans/PBMs with all of the EHR systems currently in use anytime soon,” says Thomas Borzilleri, CEO of InteliSys Health, a health technology company based in San Diego.

Still, the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs, a nonprofit group that helps set guidelines for the pharmacy industry, has been working on standards for a drug pricing tool. John Klimek, a senior vice president of the nonprofit, predicts that by next year doctors across the country will be able to use the same drug pricing tool to look up all their patients’ drug costs, regardless of the insurer.

Even without such a standard in place, doctors and hospitals have an incentive to use the tool that goes beyond saving their patients money: Such a tool can be good for a provider’s wallet, too.

For example, Allina, which owns or operates about a dozen hospitals and dozens of clinics in Minnesota and Wisconsin, gets a set fee from some insurers to care for all of a patient’s health needs. So the doctors and health system all benefit when they can reduce costs and improve patients’ adherence to taking their medication, says Dr. David Ingham, a family doctor also from Edina. He’s one of 600 primary care doctors at Allina using the tool.

“When we prescribe a more expensive medication, we share less revenue from the insurance contract,” he says.

For example, he notes that the tool helped him prescribe inhalers to asthma patients.

“I pulled up one medication I normally use, and it said it would be $240 out of pocket, but it suggested an alternative for $20 that was pharmacologically equivalent,” Ingham says. “I sheepishly asked the patient which we should choose.”

Dr. Norman Rosen, a family physician in Orange, Calif., who is employed by Providence St. Joseph Health System, is one of 800 doctors who are testing the Blue Shield of California drug pricing tool this year. Based on the first few months of use, the tool is expected to save patients more than $100,000 in out-of-pocket costs this year, according to the companies.

Without the tool, Rosen says, it would be impossible for him to quickly know what drugs are covered by which insurers and what the copays are. He says he already has saved some patients several thousand dollars a year by changing their blood pressure and diabetes medications.

“It doesn’t take a lot of time, and this can be an important intervention,” Rosen says.

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit, editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation and is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

As The Energy Market Changes, Another Coal Company Declares Bankruptcy

Another major coal company has declared bankruptcy. It’s just the latest blow for an industry that continues to struggle in a fast-changing energy market.



AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

So as we just heard, the coal industry is under pressure. But it was still a shock Monday when one of the country’s largest coal companies, Blackjewel, declared bankruptcy. The jobs of hundreds of people in Wyoming and Appalachia are now at risk. Wyoming’s Powder River Basin produces the bulk of the nation’s coal, but many are now bracing for what could be the first coal mines to close there.

Reporter Cooper McKim of Wyoming Public Media joins us now to talk about this. And Cooper, I know that there’s been a string of other coal bankruptcies in recent years, but those companies have managed to keep operating. So what’s different this time?

COOPER MCKIM, BYLINE: Right. So yeah. This is the third bankruptcy in Wyoming just since October. In other cases, the filings came down to bad bets and bad management. But the problem here is more fundamental – electricity from coal is just down, dramatically. A few months ago, it hit its lowest point in nearly 50 years. I’ve been talking a lot with Clark Williams-Derry. He’s an energy analyst with the Sightline Institute.

CLARK WILLIAMS-DERRY: Natural gas and renewables are getting so cheap that coal just can’t compete, and that’s cut into demand for coal. And so it’s a real wake up call for the Powder River Basin because there are other mines that are similarly situated to Blackjewel’s mines, that they’re in financial trouble, too. It just maybe hasn’t hit the level that Blackjewel has.

MCKIM: Williams-Derry has told me Blackjewel has almost no money in the bank – just a little over $100,000 – but well over $200 million in debt. So while other coal companies kept their employees working – that’s more normal – and mines running through bankruptcy, Blackjewel is in such bad shape, it just couldn’t swing that.

CORNISH: So how did that play out for the workers?

MCKIM: So just a few hours after the company entered bankruptcy on Monday morning, managers told about 600 people at both the mines here that everyone had to go home. They were escorted out. So they didn’t know if they were laid off or just off for the day; they were stuck in limbo. A shovel operator, J.D. Dietche (ph), said he hasn’t been able to sleep since Monday – he owns a house up there – and says he’s not only looking for jobs in the area, but now he has to look all over the country.

JD DIETCHE: I know a lot of people in the community are – they think coal miners make really good jobs, and they should have saved all that money and put it away. But the facts are a lot of coal miners are one-income families. So they live paycheck to paycheck, just like everybody else out there.

MCKIM: Most everyone is really confused right now. Their paychecks are bouncing; that’s a huge deal. Some people aren’t seeing money go into their 401(k)s. There’s just a lot of frustration.

CORNISH: Is there any kind of safety net, any kind of offers of help right now for these workers?

MCKIM: Well, Wyoming’s governor and a few state agencies held a press conference in Gillette earlier this week. A lot of workers were obviously very upset and had questions. The Department of Workforce Services here said folks were lining up by the hundreds outside their doors. They were offering help with resumes and job opportunities. But people in the local community of Gillette are really helping each other out. It’s been really cool to see. There’s this big Facebook group of Blackjewel employees, full of posts with offers of free lunch, cheaper medical care, all these job openings. It was started by a production technician at one of the mines named Rory Wallet.

RORY WALLET: It doesn’t matter if it’s a couple pounds of hamburger to gift to somebody. A couple hundred dollars donated to – for the example, there’s a local bar and grill, so that somebody can go in and decompress with a beer. Take their family down to the local ice-cream parlor and have an ice cream.

MCKIM: Yeah, Wallet’s here trying to keep his spirits up but says he’s also looking for other jobs.

CORNISH: Cooper, the president has been saying for years that he’d save the coal industry. He’s rolled back a lot of policies in order to advocate for the industry. Is there frustration that this doesn’t seem to be making much of a difference?

MCKIM: So whoever makes them (ph) policies kind of aren’t relevant when you’re talking about the market here. Renewable energy and natural gas are just cheaper now than coal, and that gives utilities a pretty simple choice. President Trump has talked about subsidizing the industry for years but hasn’t been able to make that happen. Look – I mean, the president is certainly – he’s very popular here. But when I talk to people, it just isn’t really a topic that comes up, certainly not anymore. The judge who oversees this case, though, was nominated by President Trump for a higher position. One person in the employees’ Facebook group actually mentioned that – he said, coal miners stood by Trump; hopefully the judge stands by us.

CORNISH: You’ve also talked about the idea of the cut in demand, and you do have states that are pledging to eventually cut all the carbon emissions that are warming the climate, including from coal. Are people in Wyoming worried that their state’s coal industry may not survive?

MCKIM: Wyoming is reliant on coal; that’s been the case for a very long time. A huge part of our state budget comes from royalties and taxes. People are not blind, though. So the state is talking about diversification. They’re looking at something called blockchain and wind energy. We have a lot of wind here. But coal will certainly remain in the picture. The governor has pushed for more investment in carbon capture technology, hoping a breakthrough there could help keep the industry going, even as efforts ramp up to cut carbon emissions and address climate change.

CORNISH: That’s Cooper McKim of Wyoming Public Media. Thank you for your reporting.

MCKIM: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF BOOKER T. & THE MG’S’ “WORKING IN THE COAL MINE”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Candid And Sometimes Angry, Bud Selig’s New Book May Surprise You

Former Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig sits outside his luxury suite to watch the Milwaukee Brewers game at Miller Park. His new book reveals how he navigated tumultuous events in his career like the devastating player strike and the spread of performance-enhancing drugs.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Some of Bud Selig’s new book may surprise you.

In For the Good of the Game, the former Major League Baseball commissioner is candid, sometimes foul-mouthed and angry. That’s a stark contrast to his public persona when he led the sport for more than two decades, and navigated tumultuous events like the devastating player strike and the spread of performance-enhancing drugs.

Selig retired in 2015, but he’s still closely connected to the game he fell in love with as a boy — and that he helped change in profound ways.

Sharp edges

Bud Selig didn’t like Barry Bonds.

In 2007, Selig was miserable having to follow the steroids-tainted slugger for the San Francisco Giants, as Bonds crisscrossed the country closing in on the milestone he finally reached — breaking Henry Aaron’s career home run record.

The reception area of Selig’s office in downtown Milwaukee. He likes to take visitors on a tour of his office to explain its Hall-of-Fame worthy artifacts.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

In 1995, the Clinton administration got involved in trying to resolve the baseball player strike. During a particularly heated incident, Selig launched a tirade, replete with F-bombs, against former Vice President Al Gore.

These pointed moments, recounted in the book, don’t exactly jibe with Selig’s sometimes unflattering public image. Critics derided the commissioner as bumbling and absent-minded.

Those who know him and worked with him, know differently. For them, the sharp-edged Bud Selig is real.

But so too is the one who gets lost in baseball reverence.

Almost Cooperstown

Selig likes to take visitors to his Milwaukee office on impromptu tours around the space, with its Hall-of-Fame worthy artifacts.

“Well there’s nothing like Cooperstown,” Selig says, “but this is pretty close.”

He stops at one wall, and points to a letter, written in 1942, a month after Pearl Harbor. It’s an original, from President Franklin D. Roosevelt to then baseball commissioner Kenesaw Landis, asking Landis to keep the game going during World War II.

“[Roosevelt] thought so much of the game,” Selig says, “and thought the game could really provide so much of a catharsis during the [war]. Y’know I often refer to baseball as a social institution and this letter’s another manifestation of that.”

The tour continues, past photos of “my guys” Henry Aaron, a lifelong friend and Robin Yount, who spent his entire, star-studded 20-year career with the Milwaukee Brewers. Selig brought the major league team to Milwaukee in 1970, owned it for many years and still cherishes all things Brewers.

There’s a row of seats donated by the L.A. Dodgers, signed by such luminaries as long-time manager Tommy Lasorda, Hall-of-Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax, broadcaster Vin Scully.

Mounted on another wall, an actual X-ray of legendary Boston Red Sox outfielder Ted Williams. It was given to Selig by the team.

“He broke his elbow in 1950, and played the whole game,” Selig marvels about Williams’ gritty performance in, of all things, an All-Star Game. Modern players often dismiss the game as a meaningless exhibition, but Selig likes to remind them it meant something back in the day. In fact, Selig tried to infuse the All-Star Game with more significance in the early 2000s when he announced the league that won the game would have home field advantage in the World Series. But that experiment ended in 2016.

Selig stands next to a wall display in his office of New York Yankees legend Joe DiMaggio. “Well there’s nothing like Cooperstown,” he says, “but this is pretty close.”

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Talking to owners … a lot

The book recounts how Williams liked to tell Selig he had the worst job in America.

“That’s how he started every conversation,” Selig laughs. “How do you deal with those blankety-blanks … meaning the baseball owners.”

How did Selig answer?

“I said there are some weeks you’re right,” Selig says, adding, “but [I said] I’m doing what I love. And the owners were great. I can never criticize them.”

A row of autographed chairs from Dodger Stadium sits in Selig’s office. The signatures include long-time manager Tommy Lasorda, Hall-of-Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax, broadcaster Vin Scully.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Of course many could, and did. Allegations ranged from owners trying to break the union during the 1994/95 baseball strike, to colluding in the early 1980s to hold down player salaries.

Selig, who was a long-time owner of the Brewers and, like all commissioners, worked for baseball’s owners, denies the allegations. And he still has a strong connection to at least one owner.

Mark Attanasio bought the Brewers from Selig and his family in 2005. He and Selig talk regularly – in fact, Selig’s phone rings as he’s driving to watch a Brewers game.

“Hi Mark.”

Selig, acting Baseball Commissioner of Major League Baseball and president of the Milwaukee Brewers, attends a news conference in Milwaukee, on Jan. 23, 1995, regarding the team’s season ticket sales.

Roberto Borea/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Roberto Borea/AP

Selig has turned down the Neil Diamond music he loves and now focuses on his conversation with Attanasio. Which not surprisingly, is about baseball. Milwaukee has lost two straight games. But Selig notes, so have the Brewers division rivals.

“I know the [Chicago] Cubs are losing and the Redbirds [St. Louis Cardinals] are losing but the fact is …” Selig pauses as Attanasio speaks. “Oh you bet,” Selig answers.

During his working years, Selig talked and talked to everyone, especially owners.

“Yes I did spend endless hours [on the phone],” Selig says, “no question about it.”

When he became acting commissioner in 1992, Selig says he inherited a mess.

“Owners hating each other; owners hating the union. Everybody hating the commissioner,” he says.

Communication, in Selig’s mind, was key to setting things right. It was necessary to listen, cajole and convince people that controversial proposals like adding Wild Card teams to the playoffs, introducing revenue sharing between teams, instituting drug testing … all of that was good for baseball.

And the primacy of the game, Selig says, over individual teams, is a message he learned early and preached often.

“If you really are a great sports owner,” he says, “the well being of your sport is the most important thing. Everything else is secondary.”

Building new buildings

Fans begin to leave the Milwaukee Brewers game at Miller Park. Selig led the effort to build Milwaukee’s new stadium, which opened in 2001.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Selig says new stadium construction, in the 1990s and 2000s, was a key to ensuring baseball’s well being.

New stadiums became new revenue generators. But there were often fierce battles because teams relied on a lot of public funding and, opponents said, manipulated cities by threatening to leave unless they got a new facility.

Selig led the effort to build Milwaukee’s new stadium, which opened in 2001. It was sometimes a bare knuckles effort that cost a Wisconsin state senator his job for casting a key vote in favor of public financing.

“We had a lot of controversy,” Selig says as he slides his black sedan into a spot in the Miller Park parking lot. “Public funds, private funds. [But] look at it today. They’re going to draw 3 million people here this year. In a market of a million five.”

Fans watch the game against the Seattle Mariners. New stadiums became new revenue generators. But there were often fierce battles over public funding for the projects, including Miller Park.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

This is a recurring theme in Selig’s book. Ends justified means.

There was pain and anger surrounding the 1994-95 strike and cancellation of the World Series. But since then, there have been 24 years of labor peace.

Big market owners like the New York Yankees’ George Steinbrenner railed against helping small and medium market teams. But, ultimately, Selig says revenue sharing helped save some from going bust, and increased parity so more teams could be competitive.

Steroids commissioner

There was perhaps no more enduring controversy than the issue of steroid use.

It mushroomed on Selig’s watch, prompting critics to label him the “Steroids Commissioner.”

Selig watches a presentation of the “Selig Experience” at Miller Park. It’s a multimedia presentation that tells the story of Selig’s role in bringing Major League Baseball back to Milwaukee in 1970, and leading the effort 25 years later to build the new park.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Sitting now outside his stadium suite, munching on a salad, Selig wants to set the record straight on what he calls historical myths about the drug issue.

“We were slow to react? No we weren’t,” Selig says. “This [policing steroid use with drug testing] is a subject of collective bargaining.”

And Selig says the union wouldn’t bargain.

San Francisco Giants’ Barry Bonds (left) holds the National League Hank Aaron award with Commissioner Selig during a ceremony before Game 4 of the World Series on Oct. 27, 2004 in St. Louis. Selig was inducted into Baseball’s Hall-of-Fame in 2017 but Bonds and other other players linked to the so-called Steroids era have not.

James Finley/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

James Finley/AP

He still blames the Player’s Association for resisting at every turn the drug testing he says he wanted and got the owners to support. Although a comprehensive steroids study he commissioned, the Mitchell Report, spread the blame to include baseball management, including commissioners.

“Yes [the Mitchell Report] did,” Selig acknowledges, “that’s right. But look, I’ve often thought, what else could I have done?”

Selig always has said he consulted those inside the game – managers, players, medical staff, athletic trainers – and was told steroids were not a widespread problem. But that didn’t convince skeptical baseball writers, or lawmakers. In 2007, Florida representative Cliff Stearns called for Selig’s resignation.

“Certainly, a lack of leadership and oversight in Major League Baseball enabled these abuses to continue,” Stearns said at the time. “After 15 years of slow action, a new commissioner is needed to guide the league out of this era of drug abuse.”

If Selig and baseball were slow to react, they weren’t alone among sports organizations in the mid 1990’s. That’s according to Travis Tygart, head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

“Look with the U.S. Olympic Committee [another organization hit hard by performance enhancing drug use], the light switch hadn’t gone on either,” says Tygart. “It wasn’t until Congress [held] hearings and bad [doping] cases in late 1999, going into Sydney [2000 Olympics], where they said we have to get this right.”

Tygart says the light switch eventually went on for baseball, in a big way.

A food vendor walks through the crowd during a Milwaukee Brewers afternoon baseball game. On a national level, what were once raging baseball controversies during Selig’s tenure, now are accepted parts of the game.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

“To the extent you can get [baseball] owners to agree to anything,” he says, “Selig did a hell of a job getting his owners to eventually recognize the issues and put in a strong [drug] program. And that in turn, I think, turned the tide of the players.”

Baseball’s drug program today, Tygart says, with its robust testing and sanctions and investigating arm, is the gold standard among major U.S. professional sports.

Mollifying the critics

Critics still linger, however.

Selig was inducted into Baseball’s Hall-of-Fame in 2017. Some said, as a result, Barry Bonds and other players linked to the so-called Steroids era, who’ve been left out of the hall, should get in too.

A bronze statue of Selig stands near the main entrance of Miller Park. Selig says he wants to set the record straight on what he calls historical myths about the drug issue.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

Will Selig’s book, with its detailed description of the steroid battles and lengthy explanations of his actions, mollify the critics?

“I mean that’s a fair question,” Selig says. “I don’t think so. But maybe it will.”

“It was a painful period. It was a period that was clearly not good for baseball. But I have to say, finally, through a lot of pain, we got it right.”

A hometown legacy

Whatever the final verdict, Selig knows, at least, his legacy is secure in the place he’s always cared about most.

Walking the concourse at Miller Park, next to Selig, is revealing. You’d think all the strangers coming up or calling out were planted by the team.

But it’s genuine.

Selig’s legacy is secure in the places he’s always cared about most: Milwaukee and, since 2001, Miller Park.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

“Hi Mr. Selig, how are you?”

“Thank you for transforming the game, Mr. Selig.”

Wisconsin native Ben Gentile, 37, shook Selig’s hand.

“I just told him thank you for keeping baseball in Milwaukee,” Gentile says, referring to the time, before Miller Park, when there was talk that the Brewers might leave.

Milwaukee resident Katie Allen, another Selig hand-shaker, looked star struck.

“It’s amazing he’s here,” she says, “it’s amazing. He means a lot to the city. A hell of a lot.”

On a national level, what were once raging baseball controversies during Selig’s tenure, now are accepted parts of the game.

Wild card teams. Interleague play. Revenue sharing. Drug testing.

Selig walks down a hallway to his office. He has retired but he still works. It’s someone else’s job to meet the game’s current challenges, such as attracting younger, more diverse fans and maintaining labor peace.

Sara Stathas for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Sara Stathas for NPR

It’s someone else’s job to meet the game’s current challenges, such as attracting younger, more diverse fans, maintaining labor peace and improving action on the field.

But the commissioner emeritus is always a phone call away. He talks regularly with current Commissioner Rob Manfred, although Selig won’t reveal what’s said in their conversations.

Selig’s retired but he still works. On this day, he left the ballpark after a 4th inning home run put the Brewers ahead for good. Back at the office, with a Milwaukee victory secured and surrounded by his history, chances are good Bud Selig … was satisfied.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Memphis Hospitals Suspend Debt Collection Suits, Including Suits Against Employees

R. Alan Pritchard, one of two attorneys for Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, heads into Shelby County General Sessions Court Wednesday in Memphis. He asked the court to drop more than two dozen cases as the hospital reviews its collection policies.

Andrea Morales for MLK50


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrea Morales for MLK50

This article was produced in partnership with MLK50, which is a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network.

Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, the largest hospital system in Memphis, Tenn., said it has suspended “court collection activities” over unpaid medical bills — just days after an investigation by MLK50 and ProPublica (which also appeared on NPR) detailed its relentless pursuit of debts held by poor people and even its own employees.

“We recognize that we serve a diverse community and we are always thinking about how we can do more and serve our community better,” Methodist said in a written statement. “Over the next 30 days we will be reviewing our policies and procedures to ensure we are doing everything possible to provide the communities we serve with the care and assistance they need. Also, we will immediately suspend any further court collection activities during this period.

“As a learning organization that is committed to continuous quality improvement, we want to be absolutely sure that our practices continue to support our mission and vision of improving every life we touch regardless of ability to pay.”

Methodist dropped more than two dozen cases that were set for initial hearings on Wednesday’s morning docket at Shelby County General Sessions Court.

“Currently, Methodist is in the process of reviewing its collection processes,” R. Alan Pritchard, one of Methodist’s attorneys, told General Sessions Court Judge Deborah M. Henderson.

“You are free to leave,” Henderson told one defendant, who looked puzzled, a purse on her shoulder and a folder full of papers in her hand.

Henderson called the names of other defendants whose cases were on the docket.

Again and again, Pritchard said: “Dropped, please, your honor.”

One of the defendants whose case was dropped is Adrien Johnson, who works for the city of Memphis. Methodist sued him this year for an unpaid hospital bill of more than $900.

Reached by phone, Johnson said he believes the hospital bill was for X-rays he had taken while he was covered by his wife’s insurance. Wednesday was his first court date, and after the hearing, he said he wasn’t clear what the status of his debt was.

“I don’t know what they’re doing,” he said. “I need to find out what’s going on.”

From 2014 through 2018, the hospital system affiliated with the United Methodist Church filed more than 8,300 lawsuits, according to an MLK50-ProPublica analysis of Shelby County General Sessions Court records. That’s more than all but one creditor during that five-year period.

One story by the news organizations chronicled the struggle of Carrie Barrett, who makes $9.05 an hour at Kroger, to pay her 2007 hospital bill for $12,019. The bill has ballooned to more than $33,000 due to interest and attorney’s fees.

Another story detailed how Methodist sues its own employees, some of whom make less than $13 an hour, for unpaid bills related to care delivered at its hospitals. Its health plan doesn’t allow workers to seek care at hospitals with more generous financial assistance policies.

Defendants talked about how the lawsuits upended their lives and left them in a position where they would never be able to pay off their debts, which grew from year to year as interest mounted.

With $2.1 billion in revenue and a health system that includes six hospitals, Methodist leads the market: In 2017, it had the most discharges per year and profits per patient, according to publicly available data analyzed by Definitive Healthcare, an analytics company.

Methodist says it has “a hospital in all four quadrants of the greater Memphis area, unparalleled by any other healthcare provider in our region,” plus more than 150 outpatient centers, clinics and physician practices. The system also said it provides community benefits of more than $226 million annually.

The number of lawsuits Methodist files isn’t out of proportion to its size, at least compared to competitor Baptist Memorial Health Care and Regional One Health, the county’s public hospital. But Methodist stands out in other respects.

Its financial assistance policy, unlike those of many of its peers around the country, all but ignores patients with any form of health insurance, no matter their out-of-pocket costs. If they are unable to afford their bills, patients then face what experts say is rare: A licensed collection agency owned by the hospital.

Also, after the hospital sues and wins a judgment, it repeatedly tries to garnish patients’ wages, which it does in a far higher share of cases than other nonprofit hospitals in Memphis. A court-ordered garnishment requires that the debtor’s employer send to the court 25% of a worker’s after-tax income, minus basic living expenses and a tiny deduction for children under age 15.

Methodist secured garnishment orders in 46% of cases filed from 2014 through 2018, compared with 36% at Regional One and 20% at Baptist, according to an analysis of court records by MLK50.

Methodist’s announcement was welcomed by some local lawmakers.

“Methodist has been such a great community partner throughout Shelby County that I’m glad to hear they’re reviewing their process over the next 30 days,” said Shelby County Commissioner Mickell Lowery, whose district includes Methodist University Hospital.

U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., said: “I was surprised to read about Methodist Le Bonheur’s billing practices, and I’m glad that the company is re-examining them. … I will continue to monitor this situation and look forward to the company’s assessment.”

But the Rev. Anthony Anderson, a United Methodist elder at Faith United Methodist in Memphis, was more reserved.

“I am still heartbroken, and I say that spiritually,” Anderson said. “It breaks my heart to know that a Methodist-related entity, a hospital, would have these types of practices.”

He welcomed the policy review, but only if it leads to the complete erasure of all outstanding patient debt.

“This debt needs to be wiped away,” Anderson said. “That will be the direction I will be pushing towards as a Methodist — that we don’t burden families with these type of financial penalties.”

New data obtained from Shelby County General Sessions Court shows that Methodist has filed more than 600 new lawsuits this year. Its most recent suits were filed on June 21, days before the MLK50-ProPublica stories were published. Its most recent garnishment order was filed on Tuesday.

Wendi C. Thomas is the editor of MLK50: Justice Through Journalism. Email her at wendicthomas@mlk50.com and follow her on Twitter at @wendicthomas.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Memphis Hospitals Suspend Debt Collection Suits, Including Suits Against Employees

R. Alan Pritchard, one of two attorneys for Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, heads into Shelby County General Sessions Court Wednesday in Memphis. He asked the court to drop more than two dozen cases as the hospital reviews its collection policies.

Andrea Morales for MLK50


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrea Morales for MLK50

This article was produced in partnership with MLK50, which is a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network.

Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, the largest hospital system in Memphis, Tenn., said it has suspended “court collection activities” over unpaid medical bills — just days after an investigation by MLK50 and ProPublica (which also appeared on NPR) detailed its relentless pursuit of debts held by poor people and even its own employees.

“We recognize that we serve a diverse community and we are always thinking about how we can do more and serve our community better,” Methodist said in a written statement. “Over the next 30 days we will be reviewing our policies and procedures to ensure we are doing everything possible to provide the communities we serve with the care and assistance they need. Also, we will immediately suspend any further court collection activities during this period.

“As a learning organization that is committed to continuous quality improvement, we want to be absolutely sure that our practices continue to support our mission and vision of improving every life we touch regardless of ability to pay.”

Methodist dropped more than two dozen cases that were set for initial hearings on Wednesday’s morning docket at Shelby County General Sessions Court.

“Currently, Methodist is in the process of reviewing its collection processes,” R. Alan Pritchard, one of Methodist’s attorneys, told General Sessions Court Judge Deborah M. Henderson.

“You are free to leave,” Henderson told one defendant, who looked puzzled, a purse on her shoulder and a folder full of papers in her hand.

Henderson called the names of other defendants whose cases were on the docket.

Again and again, Pritchard said: “Dropped, please, your honor.”

One of the defendants whose case was dropped is Adrien Johnson, who works for the city of Memphis. Methodist sued him this year for an unpaid hospital bill of more than $900.

Reached by phone, Johnson said he believes the hospital bill was for X-rays he had taken while he was covered by his wife’s insurance. Wednesday was his first court date, and after the hearing, he said he wasn’t clear what the status of his debt was.

“I don’t know what they’re doing,” he said. “I need to find out what’s going on.”

From 2014 through 2018, the hospital system affiliated with the United Methodist Church filed more than 8,300 lawsuits, according to an MLK50-ProPublica analysis of Shelby County General Sessions Court records. That’s more than all but one creditor during that five-year period.

One story by the news organizations chronicled the struggle of Carrie Barrett, who makes $9.05 an hour at Kroger, to pay her 2007 hospital bill for $12,019. The bill has ballooned to more than $33,000 due to interest and attorney’s fees.

Another story detailed how Methodist sues its own employees, some of whom make less than $13 an hour, for unpaid bills related to care delivered at its hospitals. Its health plan doesn’t allow workers to seek care at hospitals with more generous financial assistance policies.

Defendants talked about how the lawsuits upended their lives and left them in a position where they would never be able to pay off their debts, which grew from year to year as interest mounted.

With $2.1 billion in revenue and a health system that includes six hospitals, Methodist leads the market: In 2017, it had the most discharges per year and profits per patient, according to publicly available data analyzed by Definitive Healthcare, an analytics company.

Methodist says it has “a hospital in all four quadrants of the greater Memphis area, unparalleled by any other healthcare provider in our region,” plus more than 150 outpatient centers, clinics and physician practices. The system also said it provides community benefits of more than $226 million annually.

The number of lawsuits Methodist files isn’t out of proportion to its size, at least compared to competitor Baptist Memorial Health Care and Regional One Health, the county’s public hospital. But Methodist stands out in other respects.

Its financial assistance policy, unlike those of many of its peers around the country, all but ignores patients with any form of health insurance, no matter their out-of-pocket costs. If they are unable to afford their bills, patients then face what experts say is rare: A licensed collection agency owned by the hospital.

Also, after the hospital sues and wins a judgment, it repeatedly tries to garnish patients’ wages, which it does in a far higher share of cases than other nonprofit hospitals in Memphis. A court-ordered garnishment requires that the debtor’s employer send to the court 25% of a worker’s after-tax income, minus basic living expenses and a tiny deduction for children under age 15.

Methodist secured garnishment orders in 46% of cases filed from 2014 through 2018, compared with 36% at Regional One and 20% at Baptist, according to an analysis of court records by MLK50.

Methodist’s announcement was welcomed by some local lawmakers.

“Methodist has been such a great community partner throughout Shelby County that I’m glad to hear they’re reviewing their process over the next 30 days,” said Shelby County Commissioner Mickell Lowery, whose district includes Methodist University Hospital.

U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., said: “I was surprised to read about Methodist Le Bonheur’s billing practices, and I’m glad that the company is re-examining them. … I will continue to monitor this situation and look forward to the company’s assessment.”

But the Rev. Anthony Anderson, a United Methodist elder at Faith United Methodist in Memphis, was more reserved.

“I am still heartbroken, and I say that spiritually,” Anderson said. “It breaks my heart to know that a Methodist-related entity, a hospital, would have these types of practices.”

He welcomed the policy review, but only if it leads to the complete erasure of all outstanding patient debt.

“This debt needs to be wiped away,” Anderson said. “That will be the direction I will be pushing towards as a Methodist — that we don’t burden families with these type of financial penalties.”

New data obtained from Shelby County General Sessions Court shows that Methodist has filed more than 600 new lawsuits this year. Its most recent suits were filed on June 21, days before the MLK50-ProPublica stories were published. Its most recent garnishment order was filed on Tuesday.

Wendi C. Thomas is the editor of MLK50: Justice Through Journalism. Email her at wendicthomas@mlk50.com and follow her on Twitter at @wendicthomas.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



No Image

Why WFAN’s Mike Francesa Is The Maestro Of Sports Talk Radio

Midway through the baseball season, commentator Mike Pesca offers this ode to a sports radio talk show host who can turn even the most dismal game into high stakes drama.



RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

We are halfway through the Major League Baseball season. There’s a record number of home runs and Oakland’s Mike Fiers pitched the 300th no-hitter in baseball history. Commentator Mike Pesca isn’t paying attention to these accomplishments, though. He’s been listening to a painful and familiar tale of disappointment, as told by a maestro of sports talk radio.

MIKE PESCA: The Mets 83rd game of the year, played last Thursday, will not be looked upon as an inflection point. The Mets had just lost three games in a row to the Phillies in a manner both dramatic and predictable. The Mets get a lead. Philly stage a comeback. Phillies win the game. But last Thursday’s game promised to follow a different script.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

MIKE FRANCESA: That’s the biggest hit the Mets have had this year.

PESCA: Sports radio station WFAN’S Mike Francesa was on the air doing his daily show. Now, no player, coach or general manager has lasted as long in the New York market as Francesa, who, over the decades, has attempted to enforce some accountability to all those who wear the uniform of any New York team, and as the dean of sports talk radio, watched this game on a monitor inside his radio studio. The Mets’ Todd Frazier hit a ninth-inning home run to put the team up by two.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: Frazier pumped blood into the Met corpse.

PESCA: Francesa builds drama, concocting hope from near hopelessness – this could be a big win for the Mets, they could head into their upcoming series with the Yankees having momentum. He doesn’t dwell on the rational, folks, this is a team that’s seven games under 500. Let’s be real. He gives voice to the emotional.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: You cannot lose this – not this game. This game has to be the Mets. Case closed.

PESCA: The Mets relievers had to shut down the Phillies, just had to get out of the inning. Now listen as the game unspools before him.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: This game has got to be the Mets. It’s tied.

PESCA: Yes, the Mets were ahead. Then the game was tied, as described by Phillies broadcaster Tom McCarthy.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

TOM MCCARTHY: In the end of left-center field. Going back on it is McNeil. It is done.

(SOUNDBITE OF BASEBALL FANS CHEERING)

PESCA: And so was Francesa.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: Oh, my God. Oh, my God. Can’t happen.

PESCA: He screams. He laments. He continues to describe the action to his radio listeners, who, to be clear, could listen to the regular official game broadcast just one click away on the radio dial but would rather stick with Francesa’s show, an alternative universe of heightened stakes. Turned out to be the more rewarding choice, as the inning continued and Phillies slugger Jean Segura stepped up to the plate.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: Let’s see if he can get Segura out first. Segura hits a shot. Home run. Unbelievable.

PESCA: Sports talk radio is id, exultation and catharsis. It also gives voice to rage, a rage more articulate – or at least more amplified – than the frustration that one fan can muster in isolation. Think of it this way. No matter what theology officially teaches, when the clergyman offers his prayer, it does seem more likely to reach God’s ears. Francesa performed this function last Thursday.

(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “MIKE’S ON: FRANCESA ON THE FAN”)

FRANCESA: This is a disgrace. I don’t – I can’t even believe it. You got to be kidding me. Get rid of all of them.

PESCA: Had the Mets won, they would have had a record of 38 wins and 44 losses, just as certainly, the same sad, desultory and underachieving team they are. But had they won, we would have been denied one of the great clutch performances of the year, not on the mound, but on the mike.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

MARTIN: Mike Pesca hosts the Slate podcast “The Gist.”

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Serena Williams And Andy Murray Team Up To Play Mixed Doubles At Wimbledon

Serena Williams plays against Italy’s Giulia Gatto-Monticone in a women’s singles match at Wimbledon on Tuesday.

Ben Curtis/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ben Curtis/AP

Two tennis greats are pairing for mixed doubles at Wimbledon: Serena Williams and Andy Murray will team up for the competition. Entries for the draw close Wednesday morning.

Earlier this week both players hinted at the possibility of playing together. Two-time Wimbledon champion Murray said, “I’m definitely playing in the mixed. I have got my partner – well 90 per cent sure.

“Is it Serena? Possibly. I just need to just confirm it.”

Williams has dominated women’s tennis, winning 23 major singles championships and 14 in women’s doubles with her sister Venus.

At a news conference earlier this week, Williams fielded questions about the possibility of pairing with Murray. “His work ethic is just honestly off the charts. That’s something I’ve always respected about him. His fitness, everything. To do what he’s done in an era where there’s so many other great male tennis players, so much competition, to rise above it, not many people have done it. He’s actually one of the few,” Williams said, according to The Associated Press.

“Above all … he really speaks up about women’s issues, no matter what,” Williams continued. “You can tell he has a really strong woman in his life. I think, above all, that is just fantastic.”

Williams advanced on Tuesday at Wimbledon, beating the world No. 161, Giulia Gatto-Monticone from Italy, 6-2, 7-5. Murray is entered in men’s doubles at Wimbledon with Pierre-Hugues Herbert.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

OPEC Formally Embraces Russia, Other Non-Members In Expanded “OPEC+”

A Saudi worker adjusts flags of participating countries before a meeting of energy ministers from OPEC and its allies in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on May 19. OPEC+ countries met again in Vienna on Monday and Tuesday and agreed to formalize their relationship in a “Charter of Cooperation.”

Amr Nabil/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Amr Nabil/AP

OPEC used to shift world oil markets with a single announcement. These days, the Saudi-led organization needs help from some key partners — most significantly Russia — to exert that kind of influence.

The expanded alliance, which also includes Kazakhstan, Mexico and other nations, is known as “OPEC+.” And on Monday and Tuesday, OPEC+ made its unofficial expansion a little more official.

Member and non-member states have agreed on a “Charter of Cooperation” to formalize their relationship, pending approval from individual governments.

Khalid Al-Falih, the Saudi oil minister, called the move “historic.”

The charter “has created one of history’s strongest producer partnerships, spanning the entire world from east to west,” he said Tuesday. “Our objectives related to market stability are now matched by the horsepower needed to deliver them.”

For many decades, OPEC had that horsepower all on its own: its members controlled a majority of the world’s crude supply.

But the balance of power in the global oil market has changed. A technological revolution unlocked vast quantities of previously tough-to-access crude. The U.S. unexpectedly became the world’s No. 1 oil producer and a significant exporter. OPEC found itself controlling less than half the world’s crude, and watched as oil prices dropped.

So Saudi Arabia looked to a country that, until just a few years ago, had never cooperated with OPEC cuts and was regarded by key OPEC members as an oil rival instead of an ally: Russia. After the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, Russia is the world’s third-largest oil producer.

“There is no question that OPEC’s need to reach out to other large producers like Russia was a direct result of the fact that they were losing their power and influence over the oil market because of the rise in U.S. production and U.S. exports,” says Amy Myers Jaffe, the director of the program on energy security and climate change at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Russia and OPEC decided that they would have to form a partnership or they would lose their influence completely.”

Fortified by Moscow and other cooperating non-members, OPEC+ once again controls most of the world’s crude oil supply. In late 2016, the group agreed on production cuts that are credited with helping stabilize oil prices after their two-year slide. They’ve been extended repeatedly since then.

Building this partnership has not been easy. Iran, a founding member of OPEC, has always been wary of the power its regional rival Saudi Arabia wields within the group, and the new OPEC+ arrangement — which pivots on the partnership between Riyadh and Moscow — gives even more authority to the Saudis.

Meanwhile, Iran also has reason to be worried that the Saudi-Russia partnership could threaten the existing strategic military alliances between Iran and Russia, explains Jaffe.

“Iran is pretty isolated,” she says. “If … Russia feels there’s some benefit to itself from having a tight relationship with Saudi Arabia, then who does Iran go to for any assistance?”

As a result, while Iran has accepted the OPEC+ production cuts, it has spoken out against formalizing the expanded coalition — that is, it accepted the functional reality of the partnership but objected to putting it down in writing. Ahead of the OPEC meeting on Monday, Iran vowed to veto the plans for the charter of cooperation.

Oil minister Bijan Zangeneh went so far as to say that “OPEC might die” as a result of domination by Saudi Arabia and Russia.

But after marathon negotiations on Monday, Iran was persuaded to sign off on the draft text of the charter, which was approved by the participating non-member states on Tuesday.

OPEC+ members welcomed the charter as a tool for strengthening producers’ influence over the oil market.

However, Jaffe notes that even bolstered by the expansion, OPEC+ may not have the ability to move the price of oil as significantly as in the past. Many OPEC members are struggling with involuntary production cuts — from Venezuela’s collapse to U.S. sanctions on Iran. Meanwhile, the U.S. and other non-OPEC producers can ramp up production very quickly, thanks to new drilling technologies.

And if OPEC does push succeed in pushing prices up significantly, Jaffe says, it could backfire — from an oil producer’s standpoint — by pushing the world to more quickly reduce its demand for oil.

“If the price of oil were to go up today … more and more people would be inclined to buy an electric car,” she says. “There are all kinds of features today with new technology that make it actually very dangerous to OPEC’s long-term interest to really jack around the price of oil.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)