Articles by admin

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Batman vs. The Punisher, Darth Vader vs. Picard, the History of Title Sequences and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup Battle of the Day:

Using some special effects and clips from The Accountant, Stryder HD made a fan trailer for the dream DCEU/MCU crossover Batman v The Punisher:

[embedded content]

Mashup Hangout of the Day:

Star Wars meets Star Trek meets Guardians of the Galaxy when action figures of Darth Vader, Captain Jean-Luc Picard and Groot get together in this Nerdist parody:

[embedded content]

Mashup Trailer of the Day:

Smart Aleck Comedy recut the trailer for An Inconvenient Sequel with footage from the old Captain Planet cartoon:

[embedded content]

Lego Build of the Day:

Watch a time-lapse video of official Lego master builders putting together a statue of Thor from Thor: Ragnarok (via Geek Tyrant):

Supercut of the Day:

Burger Fiction teamed up with CatVideos.com for this supercut of the best cats in movies ever:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Michael Biehn, who turns 61 today, and Sigourney Weaver receive direction from James Cameron on the set of Aliens:

Filmmaker in Focus:

The symmetry and other geometric artistry of Nicholas Winding Refn’s movies is showcased in this supercut from Alessandro Tranchini:

[embedded content]

Film History of the Day:

Filmmaker IQ’s John Hess presents a history of the movie title sequence, including openings and post-credits scenes:

[embedded content]

Movie Trivia of the Day:

Today is the 30th anniversary of the release of The Lost Boys, so here’s CineFix with seven things you probably don’t know about the movie:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is also the 25th anniversary of the release of the Robert Zemeckis-helmed Death Becomes Her starring Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn. Watch the original trailer for the effects-driven comedy below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Fan Blamed For Chicago Cubs' Loss Gets His Own World Series Ring

On Monday the Chicago Cubs gave a 2016 World Series championship ring to Steve Bartman, a fan blamed for a team loss in 2003.

AP

hide caption

toggle caption

AP

A year after the Chicago Cubs won their first World Series title in more than a century, a long-suffering fan is getting another reward.

Steve Bartman was handed a personalized 2016 World Series ring, after being blamed for costing the team the title 13 years earlier.

It began with a simple gesture, perhaps an instinctive one on Oct. 14, 2003. The Cubs were ahead, 3-0, in Game 6 of the National League Championship Series against the Marlins in the eighth inning. A foul ball headed Bartman’s way. He — and other fans — reached out for it, but it was Bartman who deflected it from the outstretched mitt of left fielder Moises Alou.

Watch the move in the video below.

[embedded content]
YouTube

The Marlins wound up scoring eight runs in the remainder of the inning. They won the game, then the series.

The umpire determined it was fair game on Bartman’s part because he didn’t reach beyond the stands. It would have counted as interference if he had extended his arm out over the field, which would have resulted in the ball being declared dead, according to major league rules.

No one can say how things would have gone if Bartman hadn’t touched the ball. But angry Cubs fans didn’t care. Bartman had to be hidden inside the stadium after some started hurling abuse at him. Then he had to wear a disguise before being escorted out of Wrigley Field, reportsThe New York Times.

He stayed out of the public eye for the next 14 years. A friend and spokesman told CNN in 2016 that Bartman had been offered book proposals and hefty sums for a commercial, but he turned them all down. And he continued to receive threats, according his spokesman.

On Monday, Barton came to the office of Cubs owner Tom Ricketts to receive the ring, reports WGN-TV.

“We hope this provides closure on an unfortunate chapter of the story that has perpetuated throughout our quest to win a long-awaited World Series,” the team said in a statement. “While no gesture can fully lift the public burden he has endured for more than a decade, we felt it was important Steve knows he has been and continues to be fully embraced by this organization.”

If Steve Bartman is happy about this and feels satisfied, and gets closure, then it’s all good by me. https://t.co/zAx4S7fLZ5

— Brett Taylor (@BleacherNation) July 31, 2017

And now Bartman has spoken out. “Although I do not consider myself worthy of such an honor, I am deeply moved and sincerely grateful to receive an official Chicago Cubs 2016 World Series Championship ring,” he said in a statement. “I am fully aware of the historical significance and appreciate the symbolism the ring represents on multiple levels.”

Bartman did nothing wrong, and NEVER exploited his infamy. Cheers to him. Now leave him alone, forever https://t.co/oAhataLtD7

— JustNotSports (@JustNotSports) July 31, 2017

The reaction on Twitter appeared to be mostly positive, with fans applauding the move.

“I am happy to be reunited with the Cubs family and positively moving forward with my life,” Bartman said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

HBO Says It Was Hacked, Some Programming Stolen

Hackers claim to have stolen information related to HBO’s Game of Thrones, allegedly including written material from an upcoming episode. HBO has confirmed a hack occurred, but not what information was acquired. Here, Samwell Tarly (John Bradley) sits with some written material of his own.

Helen Sloan/courtesy of HBO

hide caption

toggle caption

Helen Sloan/courtesy of HBO

HBO says it has been hacked, and that the perpetrators have acquired some programming.

The premium cable channel won’t confirm what materials were acquired in the cyber breach. But the alleged perpetrators claim to have acquired text related to the popular — and famously spoiler-plagued — Game of Thrones.

Entertainment Weeklybroke the story:

“Hackers claimed to have obtained 1.5 terabytes of data from the company. So far, an upcoming episode of Ballers and Room 104 have apparently been put online. There is also written material that’s allegedly from next week’s fourth episode of Game of Thrones. More is promised to be ‘coming soon.’ “

It’s not clear if the hackers do actually have any Game of Thrones material, EW says.

NPR’s Eric Deggans reports:

” HBO is so secretive about spoilers involving its hit series Game of Thrones, journalists weren’t even given advance copies of new episodes before the new season began July 16.

“Now HBO has acknowledged that a ‘cyber incident’ resulted in stolen proprietary information, including some programming. … HBO says it is working with law enforcement and cybersecurity firms to investigate the breach.”

HBO has had material prematurely leaked online — including screeners, clips from overseas distributors and a Game of Thrones trailer, EW writes. But none of those incidents involved hacking.

“Hacking Hollywood can have significant repercussions,” The Associated Press notes. “Sony struggled in the aftermath of its huge hack in 2014, which leaked employee emails as well as films.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Future Of The Affordable Care Act Remains Uncertain

Sarah Kliff of Vox talks with NPR’s Audie Cornish about ways the executive branch can undermine the Affordable Care Act, after the Senate failed to pass legislation repealing the health care law.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Over the weekend, President Trump tweeted, if a new health care bill is not approved quickly, bailouts for insurance companies and bailouts for members of Congress will end very soon. That’s a threat to end subsidies that benefit low-income Americans who are insured through the Affordable Care Act. It’s also a threat to end subsidies specific to health plans for members of Congress. Now this tweet, among others, adds more uncertainty about the future of the Affordable Care Act after Friday’s failure to repeal and replace it.

Joining me now is Sarah Kliff. She’s a senior health care policy correspondent for Vox. Welcome to the program.

SARAH KLIFF: Thank you for having me.

CORNISH: Let’s start out with that term bailouts, the payments that the president is threatening to withhold. Tell us more about what he’s talking about and whether he could actually do what he’s threatening.

KLIFF: Yeah, so he’s talking about two things. And I’ll tackle the one for insurance companies first, and then we can go from there. So he is talking about these funds that we call cost-sharing reduction payments. This is about $8 billion that the federal government sends to insurance companies to offset the copays and deductibles that low-income patients on the Obamacare marketplaces have.

What the Trump administration is threatening to do and what they could do is say they are going to stop paying those cost-sharing reduction subsidies. That would cause a lot of chaos in the marketplaces. Experts estimate that premiums would rise 15 to 20 percent if that fund went away.

CORNISH: Now, President Trump regularly talks about letting the Affordable Care Act, quote, unquote, “implode.” In the meantime, what are the actions the Trump administration has already taken that could effectively undermine the law? What’s happened since he’s taken office?

KLIFF: A lot of it is just the uncertainty about how he is going to manage the Affordable Care Act. And for insurance companies, they don’t like uncertainty. Insurance companies love to know exactly what they’re pricing for, who’s going to sign up, how much their medical bills are going to be. So you know, it isn’t necessarily the case that they’ve put out specific policies to damage the Affordable Care Act. It’s mostly they don’t make clear what their policy positions are. And that’s actually quite damaging in itself.

CORNISH: But Democrats look at things they’re doing like saying withholding the advertising – right? – so people don’t know kind of when and where to sign up and say, look; that’s an example of sabotage.

KLIFF: Yeah, that’s a good point. You certainly do see some ads being pulled off the air in January. Just last week, the Trump administration cut off a grant to 18 cities to do enrollment work. So you’re seeing some small amounts of that. But we’ll really get a big test when we get into open enrollment in November and see, you know, is the Trump administration letting people know about open enrollment? Is it easy to get through to the call center? Are there lots of people staffing it? Or are there long waits? These are all kind of small, practical details, but they really add up in terms of whether people get health insurance or not.

CORNISH: So far, has there been an actual effect, right? Like, what has been the result of the actions they have taken?

KLIFF: So we did see enrollment go down a little bit at the end of the open enrollment season this year. This was just a few weeks after the Trump administration came into office. It’s hard to know how much of that was related to specific actions they took, but it is certainly true that we saw enrollment dip a little bit. And this is after some of the advertising was pulled. The other place we’re seeing it right now are where insurance companies say, our premiums are higher because of the way the Trump administration is managing the Affordable Care Act.

CORNISH: Let’s say we hear Republicans and Democrats are working together in a bipartisan way to improve the Affordable Care Act. In another part of the program, we’re actually talking to some House lawmakers trying to do that. Are there some obvious fixes?

KLIFF: Yeah, there certainly are, and they’re being talked about on Capitol Hill right now. One of the biggest is requiring the payment of those cost-sharing reduction subsidies, writing it into law that this money exists, that it goes to insurance companies.

The other thing that comes up that, you know, insurance companies really want is some kind of fund to offset their really expensive patient so that when they get someone with a million dollars in medical bills, that they have some kind of backup fund from the federal government. This is typically called reinsurance. And insurance companies say they would feel more comfortable enrolling Obamacare enrollees if they had that assurance they wouldn’t go broke if they get one really expensive patient.

CORNISH: For people listening who do have insurance coverage through an Affordable Care Act or Obamacare exchange, should they expect any changes to their health care or insurance just in the coming months?

KLIFF: A lot of that depends on where you live. I’d say generally the picture nationally is – we are seeing possibly some significant premium increases in 2018 because insurance companies are not sure about those cost-sharing reduction subsidies. The Blue Cross plan in North Carolina, for example, is tacking 14 percent onto their premium rate increase.

But states, particularly those that have done a lot of work to mitigate some of this uncertainty, a place like California, you’re not going to see a lot of change. But then you have other places that haven’t been as enthusiastic adopters. And I should also mention we right now have 19 counties across the country in Indiana and Nevada with no insurance plans signed up to sell coverage in 2018. If that doesn’t get fixed, those people will not be able to purchase an Obamacare plan next year.

CORNISH: Sarah Kliff is senior health care policy correspondent at Vox. Thank you for speaking with us.

KLIFF: Yeah, thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF PILOTE SONG, “SHAPESHIFTER BLUES”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

With 7 Golds, Caeleb Dressel Ties Phelps' Record At Swimming Worlds

American swimmer Caeleb Dressel clinched seven gold medals at the world championships on Sunday, tying a record set by Michael Phelps. Above, Dressel races in the Men’s 4x100m Medley Relay Final.

Adam Pretty/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Adam Pretty/Getty Images

In case you follow swimming only every four years, here’s a new name to learn: Caeleb Dressel.

The 20-year-old University of Florida student won his seventh gold medal at World Aquatics Championships in Budapest, Hungary on Sunday – tying him with Michael Phelps for most golds at the meet. Three of those were in individual races, four were in relays.

A day before, Dressel set a record all his own: three gold medals in a single night.

In the span of two hours on Saturday, Dressel won the 50-meter freestyle, the 100-meter butterfly, and was part of a victorious mixed 4×100 free relay team. He was named the top male swimmer of the meet.

“Man, that was a lot of fun,” he said.

“Phelps’ feat still stands supreme since five of his seven golds were in individual events, and he didn’t have the benefit of the mixed relays,” the AP notes. Mixed relays, with men and women on the same team, are a new event for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

Dressel represents a new era in American swimming. Phelps retired after the 2016 Olympics; Ryan Lochte, 32, was barred from the event for his antics in Rio.

This kid is on fire!! So damn fun to watch buddy!!!!@caelebdressel

A post shared by Michael Phelps (@m_phelps00) on Jul 29, 2017 at 9:36am PDT

After his big night on Saturday, Dressel was asked about the inevitable comparisons to Phelps.

“I don’t know if I welcome them,” he said, according to The Washington Post. “But I know they’re going to come. I don’t think it puts any pressure on me. I just want to keep doing my thing at this meet and for the future.”

Phelps offered his congratulations on Saturday. “This kid is on fire!!” Phelps posted on Instagram.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


James Comey has become a household name over the past few months, and for good reason. Following his controversial handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails while she was Secretary of State, the former director of the FBI has become a key witness in the probe into the Trump campaign. Comey’s dismissal from the FBI in May of this year — along with his subsequent Senate testimony — has placed him in a position to help uncover a scandal that threatens to eclipse Watergate. The Chickenshit Club, the latest book from Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jesse Eisinger, unravels a culture of cowardice, incompetence and corruption — one that has allowed the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and above all the Department of Justice to flounder in their efforts to hold not only the government, but America’s financial institutions, accountable for their crimes.

Comey may be the gateway into Eisinger’s story, but its cast of players expands widely from there. Former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates — both fired by the Trump administration — are placed in a broader context that sheds light on possible ulterior motives for their dismissals. But the book focuses its lens on the corporate bungling and greed of the past few years, most notably the 2008 financial crisis and its roots in Wall Street’s web of risky investments and banking malfeasance — all enabled by loose regulatory enforcement, cozy Washington connections, and the implicit promise of government bailouts. Eisinger is a wonk, and gleefully he wonks out: He examines culprits like Lehman Brothers and laws like Dodd-Frank with equal fascination. But he also fleshes out the backstories of those involved — for instance, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, the son of a gynecologist whose research helped develop the contraceptive pill — with all the vividness of a biographer.

As a storyteller, Eisinger is sympathetic to his subjects, but he isn’t out to make friends. Lanny Breuer, a former assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division of the DOJ, is portrayed as a showboater who, along with his boss Eric Holder, backed down from major fights against financial institutions out of a fear of political and popular fallout should they fail. As Eisinger notes, “Those who fought hard against the large corporations incurred costs, not rewards” — a frightening assessment that, while not surprising, reinforces the widely held perception that America’s corporate elite have maneuvered themselves into a position of relative untouchability.

The book is as alarming as it is comprehensive, but it’s also gripping. The unfolding of the financial crisis makes for thrilling drama in Eisinger’s hands, heightened by the anxiety still felt by all who survived it. He’s even able to make white-collar courtroom proceedings and investigations into tax shelters sparkle. However, with new developments popping daily about Comey and others entangled in Eisinger’s tale, the cursory roundup of the Trump era at the end of the book feels tacked on. Still, Eisinger is wise to contain his story to the first decade and a half of the 21st century, which gives him room to dive deeply into the nuance — and the alarming trends — of his topic.

“A senior official goes rogue, as Comey did, because he doesn’t have enough faith in the customs of his institution,” Eisinger writes, speaking of Comey’s controversial decision to announce a fresh investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails in the crucial days before the 2016 election—a move that may have cost Clinton the presidency. Eisinger makes his implication clear: The American people have become as disillusioned as Comey had in the customs of their democratic institution at large, and the symptoms are worsening.

This book is a wakeup call, delivered calmly yet with no shortage of well-reasoned urgency, to a nation whose democratic traditions are being undermined by backroom dealing, deregulation, and the consolidation of corporate power. It’s a chilling read, and a needed one.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Barbershop: Changes At The White House And What The GOP Does Next

Columnist and former speechwriter Mary Kate Cary, political strategist Ron Christie and public affairs strategist Brian Wise discuss the week’s White House shake-up, as well as the health care debate.

NOEL KING, HOST:

It’s time for the Barbershop, where we talk with a group of interesting people about what’s in the news and what’s on their minds. It’s been another big week in Washington – no exaggeration. For now, the GOP health care bill is dead. The new White House communications director, Anthony Scaramucci, has made himself known. And questions about the president’s relationship with Russia continue to swirl.

We wanted to get a conservative take on all of this. Joining us now for a shape-up, our columnist Mary Kate Cary. She’s a senior fellow at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia. She’s also a former speechwriter for the first President Bush. She’s with us in D.C.

Welcome, Mary Kate.

MARY KATE CARY: Thanks for having me.

KING: Also with us in D.C. is Brian Wise. He’s a political commentator and public affairs strategist. Hi, Brian.

BRIAN WISE: Hi. Good to be here.

KING: And joining us from our studios in New York is Republican political strategist Ron Christie. Ron is a former special assistant to the second President Bush. Ron, thanks for coming on.

RON CHRISTIE: Noel, nice to be with you.

KING: Ron, it has been a big week at the White House. Let’s start out with the most recent explosive news. Reince Priebus is out. Why did he have to go?

CHRISTIE: Well, I think the most important job that the White House chief of staff is, is beyond being the gatekeeper, beyond being the one person who can stand up to the president and say, Mr. President, no, Reince Priebus did not exhibit strong leadership. No one in the Cabinet feared him. No one in the White House feared him. The president didn’t respect him.

And the job – the severity of the task that you have as the White House chief of staff, if you don’t have the trust of the president and you don’t have the loyalty of the staff, let alone the fear of the staff of being displaced for any reason at all, you have to go. And I think the president did the right thing. He needed to bring in someone who could impose discipline, to impose order in the White House and, most importantly, to right the ship that team Trump right now is just not doing very well to advance our legislative priorities.

KING: Mary Kate Cary, before the word came out about Priebus leaving, he was in the news for some comments made by his colleague, the new communications director, Anthony Scaramucci. Mr. Scaramucci gave a very colorful interview to The New Yorker. He took shots at Priebus. He took shots at Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. I mean, you’re a communications professional. What did you think when you saw all this?

CARY: I frankly was just appalled. It was, from a communications point of view, just jaw-dropping, to me. And, you know, I did hear one funny line in Washington which was his new nickname is going to be the Moochnado (ph), as in “Sharknado”…

KING: Oh, dear.

CARY: …Which I think is, of course, the greatest film of all time. But the Moochnado really took everything – took all the oxygen out of the room in Washington and took the president off his agenda for the umpteenth time. And I think that was – that’s the bigger problem here is all of this sideshow keeps taking away from the president’s agenda.

KING: I mean, Mary Kate, we hear that the president likes his employees infighting, that he thinks feuding is good for them, it keeps them competitive. Do you think he recognizes, though, that if they are fighting, his agenda isn’t moving forward? That’s how it seems, anyhow.

CARY: Yeah, that’s how it strikes me. There’s – in every White House, there is backstabbing and infighting and all that. It just rarely spills over into the public like this and overtakes everything else. So that’s what was so shocking about it, this week, was the level of public display.

KING: Brian Wise, you are a strategist. We’ve got a new incoming chief of staff, General John Kelly. And we assume he’s a tough guy. He’s a general. If you could give him some advice, at this point, what would you say?

WISE: Well, first of all, I wouldn’t presume to give advice to one of the most highly respected military leaders of our time. But I do think it’s important to understand that, in the White House, you have management officials and you have advisers. And General Kelly is going to be an exceptional manager of the White House. And that’s one of the things that I think the White House has been missing for the last six months. However, someone like Anthony Scaramucci may be a great adviser to the president.

You know, every corporate executive needs a conciliary, if you want to talk about it in the way that maybe Scaramucci might understand. And Scaramucci is going to be the president’s conciliary here. He is going to be the adviser that is loyal to the president, not necessarily loyal to the White House administration or even the country in general.

KING: But the idea is that General Kelly, being a general, may be able to keep things in line.

WISE: He’ll bring the discipline, and Scaramucci will bring the color.

KING: All right, they could be a good team. The big legislative news this week was the collapse of the Senate health care bill, the so-called skinny repeal. Three Republicans bucked party lines to vote against the bill. It ended up going down by one vote. Ron Christie in New York, you and I have known each other for a while. And I know that you are very big on integrity. Senator John McCain’s no vote got a lot of attention. And people said, the maverick is back. What did you think?

CHRISTIE: Well, the maverick is definitely back. And yes, we’ve known each other for several years. And I’ve been pretty consistent on saying that integrity and loyalty, those are your two calling cards in politics. And Senator McCain made a grand display of coming back to Washington to cast a vote to have the motion to proceed to move forward on health care. And then he stabbed his party in the back. He voted no.

Why would you do that when we have the largest governing majority since 1929 in the House and the Senate and the presidency and undermine your party’s efforts for the last seven years of saying that we’re going to overhaul the Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act legislation? What did I make of that? For one who claims that he’s a man of honor and dignity, I thought this was the ultimate betrayal that Senator McCain did to his party and to his country for so many millions of people who are hurting by this health care law.

KING: Mary Kate, what do you think about that?

CARY: I felt earlier this week, when I saw that speech, that that was a speech for the ages. Just as a person in that world, I thought it was tremendously well-written and well-delivered and…

KING: And this is the speech in which McCain…

CARY: Spoke on the Senate floor and apologized for his role in the increasing lack of bipartisanship in Washington and called for a return to regular order. But he did say in that speech, I will not support this bill as it stands. So I was not totally surprised that he did not support the bill because he warned that he would do that if it didn’t change. And it, as far as I could tell, it didn’t change between then and the vote.

KING: Brian, at this point, the GOP is so internally divided with so many factions pulling in so many different directions. What is it going to take for Republicans to get past this internal gridlock?

WISE: I think the important thing to understand is that this is not a single party. This is a party of three different distinct factions. You have the social conservatives, the fiscal conservatives and the defense hawks. And in order to bring those people together, you need a kingmaker. The GOP has not had a kingmaker, really, in 10 years since Karl Rove left the White House. And without a kingmaker, you can’t unify the party or exert influence over members that may be inclined to vote against the party line.

And so what we need is that leader empowered to come in and bring the party together. I think the only person for that, at this point, is Mike Pence. The vice president has the power, has the support of all of those different factions. And if he was empowered by, not only the president, but also party donors, party leaders and other stakeholders of the party, I think the vice president could really be the savior of the Republican Party here in 2017 and moving forward.

KING: Do people – Mary Kate, you’re shaking your head…

CARY: Yeah…

KING: …You agree?

CARY: …I would agree…

KING: Yeah.

CARY: …With that. His former staff from the Hill is throughout the White House in legislative affairs, in communications, and I think that could be the way forward for a lot of people.

KING: We’re six months into this legislative term. We haven’t even talked today about the ongoing Russia investigation, the open tension between President Trump and his attorney general. With all that said, Republicans have control of the White House and of the Congress. What is it going to take for them to pass legislation? Ron Christie, let me start with you.

CHRISTIE: Well, they need to grow up. I mean, they actually need to figure out how to govern. And as I said a few moments ago, I mean, we’ve had the largest governing majority since 1929, and they can’t even move forward on a motion to proceed. Republicans need to say, you know what? Here’s who we are. This is what we stand for. And if we can’t govern, we need to get out of the way. It almost looks like they’re the party of being the complainers rather than the party of being governors.

KING: Mary Kate, what’s it going to take?

CARY: Well, you know, I’m a speechwriter, so I come from that angle here. Unlike tweets, speeches bring a tremendous amount of consistency, fact-checking, policy guidance, a lot of buy-in from a lot of people. And I think one of the reasons the health care bill went down was because the president did not travel the country making the case publicly in speeches to rally the American people behind it. So that would be my advice would be to get him out on the trail and giving policy addresses where he’s not ad-libbing as much as he was this week and see if he could take back the agenda.

KING: Keep some of those speeches on message…

CARY: Right.

KING: …It sounds like you’re saying. Brian Wise, there’s been a lot of talk that this has been a very bad week for the president and for the party. Ultimately, though, does that matter?

WISE: You know, at the end of the day, this is no surprise to the American people. This is the president that they voted for. This is the deal that they made with him. This is a transactional president. This is not an ideological president. And after having experienced an ideological president for the last eight years, I think it’s a little bit of a shock to people that there could be someone who was so transactional as President Trump.

So it shouldn’t be a shock to anyone that he is managing the White House in this way, he is managing public policy issues in this way because that’s the deal that he made with the American people. Moving forward, I think that that leadership – I think General Kelly coming in and the changes that are currently happening at the White House will be good for, not only the White House, but good for America.

KING: All right, there you go. We’re just about out of time. Thanks so much to Mary Kate Cary – she’s a senior fellow at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia – political strategist Ron Christie and public affairs strategist Brian Wise. Thanks, you guys.

CARY: Thanks.

CHRISTIE: Thanks so much.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

WWE Wrestles With Foreign Stereotypes In The Ring

Jinder Mahal recently shocked the wrestling world by becoming the WWE World Champion. He’s the latest in a long line of foreign wrestlers offering a blunt critique of American supremacy.

NOEL KING, HOST:

There’s a brand new bad guy in the world of pro wrestling, a world that thrives off of being provocative. Reporter Arun Venugopal of member station WNYC has more on the wrestler who wears a turban and hates America.

ARUN VENUGOPAL, BYLINE: The wrestling world was shocked – shocked – when Jinder Mahal became WWE champion in May, but not these guys.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED COMMENTATORS: Number one. Number one. Number one. India number one.

VENUGOPAL: Those are the WWE’s Hindi-language commentators. Jinder Mahal, the Maharaja, is of Indian descent, as his name may suggest. He is physically enormous and just mean.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JINDER MAHAL: Randy Orton is just like all of you. He’s just like America. He’s on the decline.

VENUGOPAL: The crowd boos and shouts U-S-A because unlike the guy he beat, Randy Orton of Tennessee, Jinder Mahal’s a foreign place, meaning Calgary. Yeah, he’s actually Canadian, but he wears a turban, and he gloats in another language.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MAHAL: Foreign language spoken).

VENUGOPAL: Punjabi. In the parlance of pro wrestling, Jinder is a heel, a bad guy. Dion Beary is a writer and wrestling fan and has been closely following Jinder’s ascent.

DION BEARY: He is really good at digging into America is losing its spot as the leader of the world.

VENUGOPAL: To China and to India. But it’s all for the best, you see, because…

BEARY: At some point, the American cowboy is going to ride in and take our wrestling back from the foreigner.

VENUGOPAL: Foreign heels have been around forever. There was Abdullah the Butcher aka the Madman from Sudan. But occasionally things have spiraled out of control. Take the story line about an Arab-American character, Muhammad Hassan. In one match, Hassan joined a bunch of masked men – basically, Middle Eastern extremists – as they beat his opponent and choked him until he was unconscious.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED COMMENTATOR: What the hell is going on here?

VENUGOPAL: That episode’s still shocking and aired in 2005, the same day a series of suicide bomb attacks went off in London in real life. Muhammad Hassan’s character was quickly disappeared. Jinder Mahal thinks it’s best not to take wrestling too seriously.

MAHAL: People know what we do is just entertainment.

VENUGOPAL: I caught him on one of his off days.

MAHAL: While you’re a WWE program, you can forget about your real-life problems and whatnot.

VENUGOPAL: And even, he says, gain some cultural exposure on the way. There have been real, live bhangra dancers at his events and music.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Anybody selling tickets?

VENUGOPAL: Tonight, Jinder’s defending his title in Rochester at the Blue Cross Arena. I asked fans what they make of him. This is Todd Eardman.

TODD EARDMAN: I have to be blunt, it’s the brown storyline. If you need controversy, give a brown guy a belt and, oh, you don’t like me because I’m this. No, we don’t like you ’cause we don’t like you. You’re not that good (laughter).

VENUGOPAL: Inside, I grab some beer and fries and a bowl of Dippin’ Dots. Jinder’s facing off against Mojo Rawley, and he’s in serious trouble.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED COMMENTATOR: And Mahal scrambles to the bottom rope here in…

VENUGOPAL: But then, something miraculous happens.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED COMMENTATOR: And look at Mahal – right across the eyes.

VENUGOPAL: Jinder comes from behind and…

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED COMMENTATOR: Oh, and the coloss (ph) from Mahal finishes off Rawley.

(SOUNDBITE OF BELL)

VENUGOPAL: And he wins. The Maharaja triumphs yet again, and America must lick its wounds. Of course, for some fans, it’s more complicated than us versus them. Rashad Fulton is Muslim and brought his kids.

RASHAD FULTON: Once they become aware, then it’s a conversation to be had.

VENUGOPAL: What’s the conversation to be had?

FULTON: That – what they’re selling, good versus bad. There’s no good and bad. It’s politics. Because on our side, we think that we are the good guys, but in all honesty, we may be the wrong ones.

VENUGOPAL: But for other fans, it’s just a matter of time before a good guy – an American – brings the wrestling title back home. For NPR News, I’m Arun Venugopal in New York.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

First Customers Get Tesla Model 3 Electric Cars

Enlarge this image

Tesla CEO Elon Musk arrives in the company’s new Model 3 electric vehicle for a special event on Friday.


Tesla/Screenshot by NPR
hide caption

toggle caption


Tesla/Screenshot by NPR

While more than 500,000 people have put down a deposit for the privilege of owning Tesla’s new Model 3, according to the company, 30 employees were the lucky few to receive their vehicles first.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk took the stage at a companywide event in Fremont, Calif., on Friday night to hand over the vehicles. Approximately a half-million people have put down $1,000 to eventually own an affordable long-range all-electric car.

[embedded content]
YouTube

“The whole point of Tesla is to make an affordable electric vehicle,” Musk told reporters earlier in the day. While Tesla gets much of the attention in the electric vehicle world, this week would be considered momentous even without Tesla.

Let’s consider the week:

That’s the context in which Musk’s long-awaited affordable car enters the market. Musk heaped praise on the Model 3 calling it “safer than a Volvo.” Musk has said also in unequivocal terms that the company needs the Model 3 to succeed: “We finally have a great affordable electric cars, that’s absolutely what’s needed for us.”

During a test-drive, the fully loaded version of a Model 3 had comparable handling and amenities of its more expensive siblings the Model X and Model S but, according to Musk, has “far fewer bells and whistles.” It’s likely a car that will satisfy Musk/Tesla enthusiasts. However, if you want those bells and whistles such as autonomy and extended range, the prices jumps much higher than the $35,000 tease rate up to nearly $60,000. Even with federal and the most generous state rebates, that is out of the range for the average driver.

The problem for Tesla, unlike other automakers, is not demand, but supply. “We’ve done everything we could to unsell the car,” says Musk.

Tesla would have to dramatically increase the scale of its production to fulfill the half-million orders. In 2016, the company produced fewer than 100,000 of its two best-selling cars. The company predicts it will be able to produce 250,000 of the new Model 3, eventually scaling up to a half-million vehicles annually.

As Europe turns toward electric cars, California is doubling down and global leaders are preparing for the rise of such vehicles. Sales of electric vehicles have increased significantly in the past 18 months, but they remain a small fraction of overall sales. Analysts say gas-powered SUV and truck sales dominate the U.S. market at more than 60 percent.

A last bit of context: Just one day before Musk took the stage, Ford’s Truck division turned 100 years old. Its F-150 remains the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. for 40 years in a row. So while the nation’s flirtation with electric vehicles is piqued, its love affair with trucks endures.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Week in Movie News: Here's What You Need to Know

Need a quick recap on the past week in movie news? Here are the highlights:

BIG NEWS

James Bond 25 frontrunners: In two years, we’ll be getting another James Bond movie, supposedly with Daniel Craig returning as 007. This week, we also heard about three filmmakers in the running to direct the movie. Read more here and here.

SURPRISING NEWS

James Cameron wants even more Terminator: Rather than just doing one more Terminator movie as previously announced, James Cameron reveals he wants to do a trilogy reinventing the property. Read more here.

AWARDS BUZZ

Wonder Woman for Best Picture?: Reportedly Warner Bros. is going to pushing hard for Oscar consideration for Wonder Woman, which is currently the year’s second highest-grossing movie in the US. Read more here.

EXCLUSIVE COMIC-CON COVERAGE

Comic-Con Buzz and Trailers: We survived another Comic-Con, and along the way we brought coverage on the MCU, DCEU, Ready Player One, Spawn and more. Read and see everything here and here and here and here.

MUST-WATCH TRAILERS

Suburbicon shows Clooney doing Coens: You’d never guess Suburbicon isn’t a total Coen Brothers effort. The duo did write the movie, which was actually directed by George Clooney. Watch the first trailer here:

[embedded content]

LBJ reveals a barely recognizable star: Can you tell who that is playing President Lyndon B. Johnson? Check out the trailer to find out here:

[embedded content]

It doubles down on dread and horror: A new trailer for Stephen King’s It has arrived and it looks pretty darn scary. Watch it below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)