Articles by admin

No Image

Autopsy Of Los Angeles Angels Pitcher Tyler Skaggs Reveals Opioids And Alcohol

Los Angeles Angels pitcher Tyler Skaggs throws to the plate during a game against the Oakland Athletics in 2018.

Mark J. Terrill/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark J. Terrill/AP

Updated at 6:37 p.m. ET

Autopsy results for Los Angeles Angels pitcher Tyler Skaggs revealed the presence of opioids and alcohol in his body after he was found dead in a Texas hotel room on July 1.

The toxicology report released Friday by the Tarrant County medical examiner says the cause of death was a mixture of “alcohol, fentanyl and oxycodone intoxication” and that Skaggs essentially choked on his vomit while under the influence.

Skaggs’ body was found in his room while the Angels were preparing to play the Texas Rangers. His death is still under investigation by local authorities. A statement released by Skaggs’ family includes mention that an Angels employee may have been involved, and according to The Los Angeles Times, the family says it won’t rest until it learns the truth about who supplied the drugs.

“We were unaware of the allegation and will investigate,” MLB spokesman Pat Courtney said.

The Angels tweeted, “Tyler was and always will be a beloved member of the Angels Family and we are deeply saddened to learn what caused this tragic death. Angels Baseball has provided our full cooperation and assistance to the Southlake Police as they conduct their investigation.”

Skaggs was drafted by the Angels in 2009 and traded to the Arizona Diamondbacks. The Angels reacquired him for the 2014 season and since then he had a record of 25-32.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Why Many U.S. Companies Have Kept Production In China And Have No Plans Of Moving

NPR’s Ailsa Chang speaks with Basic Fun CEO Jay Foreman about the effects China tariffs are having on his toy company.



AILSA CHANG, HOST:

With more tariffs looming in the U.S.-China trade war, American companies are growing more pessimistic about the outlook for doing business in China. But 87% of U.S. firms with operations in China say they still haven’t moved production to another country, and they have no plans to do so. That’s according to a new survey from the U.S.-China Business Council.

To find out why most plan to stay put, we’ve called up Jay Foreman. He’s the CEO of Basic Fun. It’s the toy company that makes K’Nex, Lincoln Logs, Cutetitos and Pound Puppies.

Jay Foreman, welcome.

JAY FOREMAN: Thank you. Glad to be here.

CHANG: So I understand that currently 90% of your products are manufactured in China. Tell me why. What benefits does China offer you to base your manufacturing there?

FOREMAN: Sure. I mean, China offers sort of a suite of benefits, if you will, which is a highly trained labor force, a well-financed infrastructure, a great safety and quality control regimen, excellent transportation and communication points and, basically, a system of production for light industrial that’s been set up over a 30-year period.

CHANG: I mean, how possible would it be to replicate those conditions in, say, Southeast Asia or India?

FOREMAN: It would be really difficult. For example, if we went to Vietnam – which is a great country with great manufacturing – it’s only 10% of the size of China. So if you just moved 5% or 10% of Chinese production into Vietnam, you’re going to max out the capacity of their workforce, and that’s going to increase prices, increase rents and make it more difficult for products to be produced there at the same competitive prices as we’ve been getting from China.

You can go to India, which has got a huge population base, but India’s infrastructure is really not set up for this. You know, we’ve developed protocols, at least in the toy industry in China, where we’re able to make safe, high-quality product at a great price. There’s no system like that set up in India. It could take 10 or 15 years to set that up. It’s taken us 30 years to build our production base in China.

CHANG: Yeah.

FOREMAN: And then bringing production back to the United States is not possible and realistic because we don’t have a labor pool here. The president is closing the borders to low-skill labor. So who’s going to make the product?

CHANG: Now, if President Trump does go through with imposing tariffs on toy imports from China after the holiday season – let me ask you – could you afford to maintain most of your production in China still?

FOREMAN: Well, we really won’t have a choice but to find a way to afford it. And the one way to afford it is, we will have to, at some point during the course of 2020, begin to pass the tariffs along to the consumer.

CHANG: So how much of a price hike are we talking for, say, like, a Cutetito?

FOREMAN: I think you’re thinking about everything from sneakers to bluejeans to toys to flip-flops to iPhones going up 15% to 30% in the second half of 2020. And by the way, what happens when you move it to India? Mr. Trump, the dealmaker, will make a deal with China sometime in the next six to 12 months, or somebody else will be in office and they’ll make a deal, while everybody’s moving their supply chain to India, and then India will become the next target for trade.

CHANG: Yeah, I was going to ask you about that. How has that uncertainty affected daily operations in your company now?

FOREMAN: Well, instead of sitting down to plan on what we think kids are going to want to buy next year, we’re sitting down every day taking a look at what tariffs are going to do to affect our profitability, when they’re going to hit.

We have something called Fun Friday here every other week, and we talk about what’s happening in the business and what’s new. And usually, we talk about toys and holidays and all those kind of things. And now our employees are coming back to us and asking us how the tariffs are going to affect them, should they be planning on buying a car. Can they expect a bonus? And it’s hard for us to give them a straight answer on that because we really don’t know how this is all going to affect us.

CHANG: Jay Foreman is the CEO of Basic Fun, a toy company based in Boca Raton, Fla.

Thanks very much for speaking with us today.

FOREMAN: You’re welcome. Pleasure to be with you today.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

For 2 Nurses, Working In The ICU Is ‘A Gift Of A Job’

Kristin Sollars (left) and Marci Ebberts say nursing is more than just a job. “Sometimes I wonder why everyone in the world doesn’t want to be a nurse,” Sollars says.

Emilyn Sosa for StoryCorps


hide caption

toggle caption

Emilyn Sosa for StoryCorps

For nurses Kristin Sollars and Marci Ebberts, work is more than just a job.

“Don’t you feel like you’re a nurse everywhere you go?” Sollars, 41, asked Ebberts, 46, on a visit to StoryCorps in May.

“I mean, let’s be honest, every time we get on a plane you’re like, E6 didn’t look good to me. Keep an eye out there.”

Sollars and Ebberts have grown so close while working together that they’ve come to call themselves “work wives.” They first met in 2007, working side by side in the intensive care unit at Saint Luke’s Hospital in Kansas City, Mo.

Now they work closely as nurse educators at the hospital, training other nurses in critical care.

“Between us, we’ve taken care of thousands of critically ill patients,” Ebberts said. “You carry a little bit of them with you. And they shape you.”

Sollars and Ebberts reflect on how their work influences their memories.

“When I think about that patient, that is the most seared in my brain, I know exactly what bed but I cannot tell you the patient’s name,” Sollars said. She goes on to remember a particularly unforgettable case: “I always think about CCU (Coronary Care Unit) Bed 2.”

The patient had a cardiac arrest. “We code him, and we get that heart rate back,” she said, describing their resuscitation efforts that stabilized the patient.

“And that was just the first of a dozen times that he coded,” Ebberts remembered.

All the while, his wife was by his side.

“We were giving her the bad prognosis. Things were looking really bad, and she said, ‘Can I be in bed with him?’ ” Sollars said.

But the nurses saw that as a risk. “This man’s got everything we’ve got in the hospital attached to him,” Sollars recalled.

“So many wires and tubes and monitors,” Ebberts added.

Still, they proceeded carefully, slowly lifting everything so she could wiggle in next to him.

“I can just remember her sobbing, saying, you know, I wasn’t a good enough wife. I should have loved you better,” Sollars said.

When the patient again suffered an irregular, life-threatening heart rhythm called ventricular fibrillation, Sollars and Ebberts started another round of chest compressions.

But this time, the patient’s wife asked the nurses to stop trying to resuscitate him. “We’re gonna let him go next time he does that,” Ebberts remembers his wife saying.

Sollars says the rewarding part as a nurse is caring for patients and their families during these crucial life moments, as difficult as they can be to witness.

“To be with people and to create those environments where they get to say their unfinished business to their husband — it’s such a gift of a job,” Sollars said. “Sometimes I wonder why everyone in the world doesn’t want to be a nurse.”

Sollars says nursing levels her sense of what’s important.

“It does impact the way we see the entire world. That person in front of us in the grocery store is all worked up about how that guy bagged their groceries,” she said.

“Nobody’s dying,” Ebberts said, “until someone is. And then we’re ready.”

Audio produced for Morning Edition by Aisha Turner and Camila Kerwin.

StoryCorps is a national nonprofit that gives people the chance to interview friends and loved ones about their lives. These conversations are archived at the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress, allowing participants to leave a legacy for future generations. Learn more, including how to interview someone in your life, at StoryCorps.org.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

EPA Aims To Roll Back Limits On Methane Emissions From Oil And Gas Industry

The Environmental Protection Agency has released a proposed rule that could roll back requirements on detecting and plugging methane leaks at oil and gas facilities.

Charlie Riedel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charlie Riedel/AP

The Trump administration is proposing to slash restrictions on the oil and gas industry for methane emissions, a greenhouse gas that is a powerful driver of climate change.

Environmental groups are alarmed. “This would be a huge step backward,” said Ben Ratner, a senior director at the Environmental Defense Fund. “It would cause greatly increased pollution and a big missed opportunity to take cost effective immediate action to reduce the rate of warming right now.”

The Trump administration argues it would save the oil and gas industry $17 million to $19 million annually in compliance costs. But that’s “such a small fraction of the industry total cash flow that it’s just laughable,” says Harvard University’s Steven Wofsy, a professor of atmospheric and environmental science.

The Trump administration also says it does not anticipate an increase in the level of methane emissions if the proposal is implemented — but scientists disagree with that assumption.

Methane powerfully traps heat, and can warm the atmosphere at 25 times the rate of carbon dioxide. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the oil and gas industry is the largest source of methane emissions in the U.S.

In March 2017, Trump ordered agencies to “review existing regulations that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources.” This proposal came out of that review.

In a statement describing the proposal, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler reiterated an argument against such regulations often used by the oil and gas industry: “The Trump Administration recognizes that methane is valuable, and the industry has an incentive to minimize leaks and maximize its use.”

Critics of that logic say that it doesn’t always make immediate economic sense for companies to upgrade old, leaky equipment for newer models, even if they could use the leaked methane.

Industry reaction was mixed. The American Petroleum Institute welcomed the rollback. “The oil and natural gas industry is laser-focused on cutting methane emissions through industry initiatives, smart regulations, new technologies, and best practices,” said Erik Milito, API’s Vice President of Upstream and Industry Operations.

But some oil and gas companies, including Shell, BP and Exxon, have actually supported the Obama-era regulations.

“Shell remains committed to achieving our target of maintaining methane emissions intensity below 0.2% by 2025 for all operated assets globally,” Shell U.S. President Gretchen Watkins said in a statement. “Despite the Administration’s proposal to no longer regulate methane, Shell’s U.S. assets will continue to contribute to that global target.”

The greenhouse gas methane is released at many points in the industry: “Methane is emitted to the atmosphere during the production, processing, storage, transmission, and distribution of natural gas and the production, refinement, transportation, and storage of crude oil,” the EPA has said.

The EPA’s main proposal on methane, released Thursday, would “remove sources [from regulation] in the transmission and storage segment of the oil and gas industry.” It would also rescind emissions limits on methane from the production and processing steps.

The Trump administration points out that U.S. methane emissions are on a downward trend, and argues that will continue, despite the rollback to regulations. In a phone call with reporters, EPA acting assistant administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation Anne Idsal said that existing limits for ozone-forming volatile organic compounds will remain in place for the industry’s production and processing sectors.

“Frankly, the controls to reduce VOC emissions also reduce methane emissions at the same time, so we don’t believe that separate methane limitations for that segment of the industry are necessary – and quite frankly, are redundant,” Idsal said.

Stanford University’s Adam Brandt, an energy resources engineering professor who focuses on greenhouse gas emissions, does not agree.

“This proposal is likely to result in higher methane emissions and to stall progress the industry has made in detecting and fixing leaks,” he said. Brandt also said existing limits on VOCs will not reduce methane emissions as much as is needed to meet climate goals.

Harvard scientist Wofsy agreed that there’s no evidence the rollback won’t increase methane emissions. “I think it will have significant negative impact,” he says.

He said this proposal withdraws regulations from parts of the oil and gas industry notorious for emitting methane, such as storage tanks.

New York Attorney General Letitia James decried the plan as part of an “unconscionable assault on the environment,” and vowed to “use the full power of my office to fight back against this.”

The proposal will go through a 60 day public comment period, and the EPA will hold a hearing about it in Texas. If the change becomes final, it will likely face legal challenges. That means the proposal might not take effect before the 2020 election.

NPR’s Jeff Brady contributed to this report.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

At The U.S. Open, The Ball’s In Their Court — And It’s Their Job To Pick It Up

For the ballpersons of the U.S. Open tennis tournament, footwork and athletic ability are important, but “good focus” is the first priority, says manager Tina Taps.

Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images

As the 2019 U.S. Open tennis tournament ramps up in Queens, N.Y., this week, all eyes will be on the elite athletes competing. But it’s hard to miss the anonymous people darting back and forth on the court.

Each match has six ballpersons: a pair at either end of the court and a pair at the net. They have to run after balls out of play, quickly and accurately roll them to the backcourt and give the players towels and balls to serve — all as unobtrusively as possible.

With such proximity to world-class tennis, many ballpersons come back year after year. But you have to get the job first.

In early June, the hopefuls — most of whom play tennis themselves — are put through their paces in a tryout. There’s a lot of running, but athleticism isn’t the only criterion for selection.

“The first thing we’re looking for is someone with good focus,” says Tina Taps, who has managed U.S. Open ballpersons for 30 years. “They have to be calm. They have to think about what’s going on. They have to take a full picture in their brain of all, every single part, of the court: back corners, the net, the officials, the chair official.”

Moera Kamimura, 14, got selected for callbacks, held a few weeks after tryouts. She’s on her junior varsity tennis team in Ridgefield, Conn. On court, Moera has a look of quiet concentration, standing still, then scurrying after the ball.

“Speed is really important,” she says. “And if you can’t run fast, you won’t be able to be at net.”

Moera Kamimura, 14, is in her first year as a ballperson at the U.S. Open, one of the four major tournaments in professional tennis.

Allison Joseph/USTA


hide caption

toggle caption

Allison Joseph/USTA

Moera makes the squad and attends three training sessions, which cover all potential game situations. Supervisor Tiahnne Noble is the instructor.

“Our communication is all silent and movements, OK?” she says. “So, you guys need to be switched on and need to be making sure at the end of every point, you’re knowing where all those six balls are. You need to try and be that one step ahead.”

Nicholas Zikos also started at the U.S. Open when he was 14 — the minimum age. He’s now 27 and a financial adviser but continues to return every year. He has been on center court for several men’s finals.

“We have the best seat, best standing position in the house,” Zikos says. “And yeah, there are moments where you’re like, ‘Whoa, yeah … still have a job to do.’ But it just becomes natural after a certain point. It’s great.”

The U.S. Open is the only Grand Slam tournament without an upper age limit for its ballpersons. Tony Downer, from Stamford, Conn., is a retired venture capital equity investor — and of the 300 ballpersons, he’s the oldest, at 61. A huge tennis fan, Downer is more than happy to work for minimum wage just to be a few feet away from the finest players in the world.

“This is a big money-losing event, between the tolls, my wife’s tickets, the souvenirs, etc.,” he says. “I’m not doing it for the money.”

The vets and rookies all start a week before the tournament proper, joining together to work the qualifying rounds. Moera says she felt good about her first match.

“It was nerve-wracking at first, but I think I kind of got used to it once we went into a few rounds,” she says. “They were great players, and just to be there and watch them and be able to serve them was pretty cool, I think.”

And it’s not lost on the players either. Reigning women’s champion Naomi Osaka says she appreciates the support.

“I see them sprinting back and forth, and I’m just like, ‘Wow!’ ” Osaka says. “Like, I kind of want to offer them water sometimes, and a towel. And I know that they’re here for the love of tennis, so I’m grateful for them.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bill Of The Month: Estimate For Cost Of Hernia Surgery Misses The Mark

Before scheduling his hernia surgery, Wolfgang Balzer called the hospital, the surgeon and the anesthesiologist to get estimates for how much the procedure would cost. But when his bill came, the estimates he had obtained were wildly off.

John Woike for Kaiser Health News


hide caption

toggle caption

John Woike for Kaiser Health News

From a planning perspective, Wolfgang Balzer is the perfect health care consumer.

Balzer, an engineer, knew for several years he had a hernia that would need to be repaired, but it wasn’t an emergency, so he waited until the time was right.

The opportunity came in 2018 after his wife, Farren, had given birth to their second child in February. The couple had met their deductible early in the year and figured that would minimize out-of-pocket payments for Wolfgang’s surgery.

Before scheduling it, he called the hospital, the surgeon and the anesthesiologist to get estimates for how much the procedure would cost.

“We tried our best to weigh out our plan and figure out what the numbers were,” Wolfgang said.

Share Your Story And Bill With Us

If you’ve had a medical-billing experience that you think we should investigate, you can share the bill and describe what happened here.

The hospital told him the normal billed rate was $10,333.16, but that Cigna, his insurer, had negotiated a discount to $6,995.56, meaning his 20% patient share would be $1,399.11. The surgeon’s office quoted a normal rate of $1,675, but the Cigna discounted rate was just $469, meaning his copayment would be about $94. (Although the Balzers made four calls to the anesthesiologist’s office to get a quote, leaving messages on the answering machine, no one returned their calls.)

Estimates in hand, they budgeted for the money they would have to pay. Wolfgang proceeded with the surgery in November, and, medically, it went according to plan.

Then the bill came.

The patient: Wolfgang Balzer, 40, an engineer in Wethersfield, Conn. Through his job, he is insured by Cigna.

Total bill: All the estimates the Balzers had painstakingly obtained were wildly off. The hospital’s bill was $16,314. After the insurer’s contracting discount was applied, the bill fell to $10,552, still 51% over the initial estimate. The contracted rate for the surgeon’s fee was $968, more than double the estimate. After Cigna’s payments, the Balzers were billed $2,304.51, much more than they’d budgeted for.

Service provider: Hartford Hospital, operated by Hartford HealthCare

Medical procedure: Bilateral inguinal hernia repair

What gives: “This is ending up costing us $800 more,” said Farren, 36. “For two working people with two children and full-time day care, that’s a huge hit.”

When the bill came on Christmas Eve 2018, the Balzers called around, trying to figure out what went wrong with the initial estimate, only to get bounced from the hospital’s billing office to patient accounts and finally ending up speaking with the hospital’s “Integrity Department.”

They were told “a quote is only a quote and doesn’t take into consideration complications.” The Balzers pointed out there had been no complications in the outpatient procedure; Wolfgang went home the same day, a few hours after he woke up.

The couple appealed the bill. They called their insurer. They waited for collection notices to roll in.

Hospitalestimates are often inaccurate and there is no legal obligation that they be correct, or even be issued in good faith. It’s not so in other industries. When you take out a mortgage, for instance, the lender’s estimate of origination charges has to be accurate by law; even closing fees — incurred months later — cannot exceed the initial estimate by more than 10%. In construction or home remodeling, while estimates are not legal contracts, failure to live up to them can be a basis for liability or a “claim for negligent misrepresentation.”

In this case, Hartford Hospital produced an estimate for Balzer’s laparoscopic hernia repair, CPT (current procedural terminology) code 49650.

The hospital ran the code through a computer program that produced an average of what others have paid in the past. Cynthia Pugliese, Hartford Health’s vice president of revenue cycle, said the hospital uses averages because more complicated cases may require additional supplies or services, which would add costs.

“Because it was new, perhaps the system doesn’t have enough cases to provide an accurate estimate,” Pugliese says. “We did not communicate effectively to him related to his estimate. It’s not our norm. We look at this experience and this event to learn from this.”

Efforts to make health care prices more transparent have not managed to bring down bills because the different charges and prices given are so often inscrutable or unreliable, says Dr. Ateev Mehrotra, an associate professor of health care policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School.

“The charges on there don’t make any sense. All it does is, people get pissed off,” Mehrotra said. “The charge has no link to reality, so it doesn’t matter.”

Resolution: “Because I roll over more easily than my wife does, I’m of the mindset to pay it and get done with it,” Wolfgang said. “My wife says absolutely not.”

Investigating prices, dealing with billing departments and following up with their insurer was draining for the Balzers.

“I’ve been tackling this since December,” Wolfgang says. “I’ve lost two or three days in terms of time.”

For the Balzers, there’s a happy ending. After a reporter made inquiries about the discrepancy between the estimate and the billed charges — six months after they got their first bill — Pugliese told them to forget it. Their bill would be an “administrative write-off,” they were told.

“They repeatedly apologized and ended up promising to adjust our bill to zero dollars,” Wolfgang wrote in an email.

The takeaway: It is a good idea to get an estimate in advance for health care, if your condition is not an emergency. But it is important to know that an estimate can be way off — and your provider probably is not legally required to honor it.

Try to request an estimate that is “all-in” — including the entire set of services associated with your procedure or admission. If it’s not all-inclusive, the hospital should make clear which services are not being counted.

Having an estimate means you can make an argument with your provider and insurer that you shouldn’t be charged more than you expected. It could work.

Laws requiring at least a level of accuracy in medical estimates would help. In a number of other countries, patients are entitled to accurate estimates if they are paying out-of-pocket.

Most patients aren’t as proactive as the Balzers, and most wouldn’t know that the hospital, surgeon and anesthesiologist would all bill separately. And most wouldn’t fight a bill that they could afford to pay.

The Balzers say they wouldn’t have changed their medical decision, even if they had been given the right estimate at the beginning. It’s the principle they fought for here: “There’s no other consumer industry where this would be tolerated,” Farren wrote in an email.

Bill of the Month is a crowdsourced investigation by Kaiser Health News and NPR that dissects and explains medical bills. Do you have an interesting medical bill you want to share with us? Tell us about it!

Let’s block ads! (Why?)