Articles by admin

No Image

How To Teach Future Doctors About Pain In The Midst Of The Opioid Crisis

Students in medical schools are about to become doctors in the midst of an opioid crisis. That's why one top U.S. medical school is rethinking what to teach them about pain and pain management.

Tracy Lee for NPR

The next generation of doctors will start their careers at a time when physicians are feeling pressure to limit prescriptions for opioid painkillers.

Yet every day, they’ll face patients who are hurting from injuries, surgical procedures or disease. Around 20% of adults in the U.S. live with chronic pain.

That’s why some medical students felt a little apprehensive as they gathered recently for a mandatory, four-day course at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore — home to one of the top medical schools in the country.

The subject of the course? Pain.

“I initially was a bit scared and I guess a bit wary coming into this course because of the opioid crisis,” says medical student Annie Cho. “That seems like that’s the only thing that people have been talking about nowadays.”

She wasn’t the only one aware of how fraught pain can be right now. Student Jenny Franke says she has been shadowing doctors in a clinic and has seen new patients come in with pain.

“And it seems that the therapy that they are on hasn’t been working, and a lot of the time, their past primary care providers just keep prescribing the same thing over and over,” Franke says. “Sometimes those patients will ask for opioids, and then it turns into kind of an awkward conversation.”

Even though doctors see a lot of pain, medical schools traditionally haven’t dedicated much time to teaching future physicians about it, says Dr. Shravani Durbhakula, a pain management specialist at Johns Hopkins Hospital and director of the pain course this year.

“Most medical schools get about nine hours of formalized pain education,” says Durbhakula. “If I was to think back to my training, it probably is somewhere about that much time.”

While she remembers some classes on certain painkillers, she says, “I don’t remember a lot of formal pain education, certainly not any kind of course that was given to me. It was just something you kind of learned as you went along.”

“There are very few medical schools that have a course like ours,” agrees Jennifer Haythornthwaite, a professor in the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Most schools have integrated pain management throughout their curriculum, says Alison Whelan, chief medical education officer at the Association of American Medical Colleges, which represents hundreds of medical schools and teaching hospitals.

A couple of years ago, her group did a telephone survey of its members to see what they were teaching about pain. They asked about four important categories: what pain is, how you identify it and assess the severity, how you treat it, and how you deal with cultural and social issues related to pain management.

While 87% of medical schools reported teaching all of those pain-related subjects, there’s great interest in medical schools in coming up with new ways to bolster teaching about the management of pain.

And a recent review of a key medical licensing exam showed that most of the questions it asked about pain focused on assessment, rather than on safe and effective pain management.

Barbara Del Duke, a spokesperson for the National Board of Medical Examiners, says that every year, hundreds of volunteers gather to write new questions for this test. “The opioid epidemic is definitely on the minds of these volunteers,” she says. “We see evidence of this through the test items they write.”

All of this is a big change. About a decade ago, as the opioid crisis was taking off in the U.S., a Johns Hopkins neurologist and pain specialist named Beth Hogans looked to see what medical schools were teaching about these drugs.

“U.S. medical students were getting less than one hour, on average, of opioid- related instruction in medical school,” Hogans says. “That’s not enough.”

She helped create the four-day course at Hopkins, with the idea of giving all students a solid foundation for thinking about pain and pain management at the start of their medical education.

Here, the students learn that pain is a physical and an emotional experience and that doctors tend to underestimate pain. They learn how it can be affected by people’s moods, cultural expectations or individual sensitivity. They discuss problems with the usual way of asking patients to rate their pain on a scale of 1 to 10, and learn to instead ask whether and how pain limits people’s daily activities.

And, of course, they talk about opioids. A doctor named Ryan Graddy asks the students to pull out their cellphones. He says they should text him a few words in response to this question: “What comes to mind when I say ‘chronic opioid therapy’?”

Their answers start to appear on a big screen behind him. The first word is BAD. Other words pop up, including ADDICTION and DRUG ABUSE. The lecture hall fills with nervous laughter.

“So, interesting, right, a lot of negative connotations that people have with chronic opioid therapy,” says Graddy, who goes on to describe some of the challenges his patients face and why some have been on opioid pain medications long term.

Overall, students get taught that opioids are just one tool in the toolbox — though one they will have to learn to use thoughtfully and carefully.

“You wouldn’t really use a chainsaw to cut a piece of paper. But you also wouldn’t use a pair of scissors to cut down a tree,” Cho says.

Over and over, speakers stress the need to build a relationship with patients rather than just write a prescription.

“We can’t just focus on that single moment of writing a script,” says bioethicist Travis Rieder, who shared a harrowing account of how he was prescribed opioids by about a dozen different caregivers after having an accident and then surgery. When he became physically dependent and wanted to stop taking opioids, he couldn’t find a doctor willing to help him get through his agonizing withdrawal.

Rieder’s experiences surprised medical student David Botros. “I really didn’t expect that to even be … I don’t want to say possible, but even a factor in the health care world, I guess,” Botros says.

Botros and the other students heard about other possible medications, beyond opioids. And they learned that pain control goes way beyond just prescribing drugs. Patients could benefit from physical therapy, cognitive behavioral psychotherapy and all kinds of exercise, such as yoga.

“You really need to address the whole person,” says Dr. Traci Speed, assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins. She notes that co-occurring depression or substance use can increase the severity of pain. “It’s the chicken and the egg, which one do you treat first? And sometimes, you have to treat both to really get patients to improve.”

Graddy thinks the medical profession overall has been doing a disservice to patients when it comes to chronic pain. “I see that certainly in my own practice — a lot of patients who have bounced around from place to place and not been treated with the respect or dignity or empathy that they deserve,” he says.

That’s why this hospital invited patients and their families to this lecture hall to movingly convey how pain impacts their entire lives. And these medical students definitely get the message.

“I felt like I learned a lot and it was very helpful,” Franke says. “One thing I learned was to really get into the patients’ perspectives and their values and figuring out what their pain goals are. One important thing we learned is that it’s rare that you will get a chronic pain level to a zero.”

Tony Wang took this course two years ago and is just finishing his third year of medical school.

“The takeaway message that I distinctly remember leaving with was that pain management is extremely complicated,” Wang says. “It’s not just, give this medication and they’ll feel better.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Wilbur Ross At The Center Of Another Political Storm, This Time About The Weather

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is under the microscope for reportedly pressuring government scientists to back President Trump over a misleading tweet about Hurricane Dorian.

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is under the microscope again, amid fresh allegations of meddling with a government scientific agency.

The latest storm to engulf the secretary began Sept. 1, when weather forecasters in Birmingham, Ala., issued a tweet saying Hurricane Dorian posed no threat to their state.

“We were reacting to the calls that were coming into our office, and people were actually frightened,” said Kevin Laws, science officer for the National Weather Service in Birmingham. “They were wanting to cancel surgeries, and they were wanting to go pick up elderly parents at the coastline because they were genuinely scared. And we felt like we needed to make a statement on where this storm was going to go and to reassure our people.”

Laws and his colleagues learned only later what sparked those anxious phone calls: a tweet from President Trump, mistakenly including Alabama on a list of states that could be hard hit by the storm.

For days, Trump stubbornly insisted he was right about the hurricane’s path, giving fodder to late-night comics when he showed off a map that had been clumsily doctored with a Sharpie. But the story took a more serious turn last Friday when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — the federal agency that includes the National Weather Service — issued an unsigned statement defending the president’s tweet and chastising the Birmingham forecasters who contradicted it.

According to The New York Times, NOAA’s statement followed political pressure from the commerce secretary, who oversees the weather agency and threatened to fire NOAA officials if they failed to back up the president.

“This is the straw that broke the camel’s back,” said Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., who called for Ross to resign. “Threatening to fire senior NOAA appointees if they didn’t prop up Trump’s false weather claims? It’s just one bridge too far.”

A Commerce Department spokesman denied the Times report, saying Ross didn’t threaten to fire anyone over the dueling hurricane statements.

“Secretary Ross has never stopped advocating for the American people,” the spokesman said in a statement.

But the episode has brought renewed attention to Ross’ history of interfering with government scientists.

“It’s part of a pattern of deemphasizing science and facts and the truth in order to play some often naive or silly political agenda,” said Beyer, who serves on the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. The committee’s chairwoman, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, endorsed an investigation of the NOAA statement by the Commerce Department’s inspector general.

Ross, who also oversees the Census Bureau, previously bucked scientific experts there when he tried to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, despite warnings that it would jeopardize an accurate head count.

“It certainly introduces uncertainties about the scientific integrity of our national statistics when you see political interference with the mission of these agencies,” said John Thompson, who directed the bureau from 2013 to 2017.

The Supreme Court ultimately blocked the citizenship question. In his ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts suggested that the question would have been allowed if Ross had not misrepresented his motives. Ross claimed he was acting on a request from the Justice Department, but Roberts concluded that this was a mere pretext.

The Trump administration has also been quietly purging information about climate change from government websites and replacing independent scientific advisers with industry insiders. Complaints about the scientific integrity of government agencies can often seem esoteric. But a battle over the National Weather Service helps bring it home.

“Everyone knows their local TV meteorologist and understands that they get information directly from the government,” said Michael Halpern of the Union of Concerned Scientists. “The air pollution scientists who work for EPA are a little bit more behind the scenes, but their work is just as critical to protecting the public.”

Ross hasn’t tried to skew only government measurements. He has also tried to skew measures of his own wealth. For years, Forbes magazine included Ross on its list of the richest Americans, estimating his fortune at $2.9 billion in 2016. But once he joined the administration, financial disclosures revealed Ross was really worth only a fraction of that.

“We estimate that he is worth about $600 million,” said Forbes senior editor Dan Alexander. “And what’s sad — somebody who has been so successful and is so wealthy, still for him it wasn’t enough. He wanted to be seen as richer. [He] wanted people to think he was a billionaire, and he just never was.”

In a 2017 story about Ross’ exaggerated claims of wealth, Alexander quoted longtime co-workers about the secretary’s habit of bending the truth.

“At this point, people just don’t trust him,” Alexander said Tuesday, as the NOAA controversy was making headlines. “So it wasn’t that much of a surprise to see that Wilbur was apparently helping cover up for misinformation about that.”

By the time Dorian’s winds reached hurricane strength, Ross’ credibility was in danger, even if the people of Alabama were not.

Mary Scott Hodgin of member station WBHM contributed to this report.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

NFL Season Kicks Off With Refuges For Fans With Sensory Needs To Take A Timeout

Sheletta and Shawn Brundidge, alongside their four children, were the first fans to use the sensory room at the Minnesota Vikings’ U.S. Bank Stadium. Opened during the August pre-season, the space comes with trained therapists and provides fans, including those with autism, a break from the excitement of the game.

Tami Hedrick/Minnesota Vikings


hide caption

toggle caption

Tami Hedrick/Minnesota Vikings

The roar of the crowd, the boom of the sound system, the flash of fireworks — all part of the thrill for many fans who flock to NFL games, but for others, including those on the autism spectrum with sensory issues, the experience can be too much.

Now a growing number of teams are including “sensory inclusive spaces” within their arenas to accommodate them.

The Philadelphia Eagles, the Seattle Seahawks and the Minnesota Vikings have all opened rooms that provide a refuge for those who need to step away from the clamor. The spaces come equipped with dim lighting, sound-protected walls and sensory activities, including toys and games, with the goal of providing a reset.

And Julian Maha, co-founder of KultureCity, the nonprofit that worked with the Vikings and the Eagles to design the rooms, told NPR that there are many people who may need that reset.

“One in six people in the U.S. have a sensory need,” said Maha, who is also a medical doctor. That can include individuals not only with autism, but also Down syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder and dementia; all challenges that Maha said may not be visibly apparent but come with “a freedom barrier.”

“The lights, the noises, the crowd can be not only overwhelming from a sensory aspect but also physically painful to them,” he said.

Valerie Paradiz, vice president of services and supports at Autism Speaks, who was diagnosed with autism as an adult, told NPR that for people on the autism spectrum, public sports events can be especially difficult to process. “By creating a calm space, these NFL stadiums encourage inclusion and enable people with autism, their families and friends to attend events together,” she said in an email.

Tami Hedrick, the Vikings’ director of women’s initiatives, worked to create the sensory inclusive space at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis.

She told NPR that the Brundidge family — whose three out of four children have been diagnosed with autism-spectrum disorders — were the first people to use the room when it opened during the August preseason. Hedrick said the room was a game changer for the family, as they would have been unable to attend without it.

A child enjoys the sensory inclusive space at U.S. Bank Stadium during the Minnesota Vikings’ August pre-season.

Tami Hedrick/Minnesota Vikings


hide caption

toggle caption

Tami Hedrick/Minnesota Vikings

The room comes with two trained therapists and has so far averaged around 15 people per game, Hedrick said. Attendance is capped at four people at a time, and they are asked to stay for no longer than twenty minutes, although accommodations could be made as needed.

“We want to be able to have that privacy and to have that quiet,” he said. “All of them were only in there for about five minutes. They didn’t really need a lot more time.”

Several arenas, including the Denver Broncos’ Mile High Stadium, the New York Giants and Jets’ MetLife Stadium and the Pittsburgh Steelers’ Heinz Field, are also accommodating fans with special needs by offering tool kits with noise-cancelling headphones and sensory toys — known as fidget tools.

The kits come with a badge letting staff know that a fan can leave the arena and come back in.

KultureCity works with franchises to train staff to recognize what sensory needs look like. The training, Maha said, includes “the awareness and freedom you’re giving to this population to come into your facility without fear of judgement.”

Maha knows the feeling. His 11-year-old son was diagnosed with autism and is non-speaking.

He also adores basketball.

At one time, the family only got to enjoy a few minutes of an Atlanta Hawks’ game before having to leave. Now several NBA teams have added sensory rooms to their arenas, including the Hawks. Now, Maha said, his son can stick it out for an entire game, occasionally using the sensory room — and the kit — to decompress.

“It’s been transformative,” Maha said. “At the core, it gives families and individuals the freedom to re-engage with communities again.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Looking Back At The Best Of This Year’s U.S. Open

NPR’s Ailsa Chang talks with Jon Wertheim of Sports Illustrated about the amazing play seen at the U.S. Open this year.



AILSA CHANG, HOST:

It took nearly five exhausting hours, but Rafael Nadal pulled off his fourth U.S. Open title last night in New York. He outlasted Russia’s Daniil Medvedev in five sets for his 19th Grand Slam title. Joining me on Skype now to talk about last night’s entertaining end to an entertaining tournament is Jon Wertheim of Sports Illustrated. Hey there.

JON WERTHEIM: Hi, Ailsa.

CHANG: OK, so Nadal’s latest Grand Slam title puts him – what? – just one behind his rival Roger Federer for most Grand Slam titles ever. But just looking at last night, how great of a feat was it for him to go five sets against a player 10 years younger than him?

WERTHEIM: This was a tremendous feat, especially given the rhythms of this match, where Nadal won the first two sets. It looked like he was cruising and we would all make it to our dinner appointments, and then all of a sudden, this Russian, who – you’re right – was 10 year Nadal’s junior, was absolutely persistent and didn’t miss. And suddenly, here we are in a fifth set, and the crowd is engaged. And what Nadal had to do and what he had to overcome to end up winning this match made this sort of an unexpectedly complicated day at the office but, I think, really one of his great career triumphs.

CHANG: But maybe one of the most exciting things that happened last night was the guy on the other side of that match, the rise of Medvedev, right? He started out as this guy that everyone hated during this tournament for being rude and obnoxious. Like, he flipped off an official. People were booing him. But then last night, he played phenomenal tennis. Can you just tell us how he turned things around?

WERTHEIM: It was one of the great comebacks but also one of the great character comebacks. You’re right. Everyone sort of expected to come and witness a public execution and good would triumph over evil and Nadal would beat this guy. And by the end, Medvedev had the crowd behind him. He got a standing ovation when it was over. And the other thing – this is really an emergence of a young, talented, ascending player. I mean, he had a terrific summer. He came to the U.S. Open. He won six matches. This guy who, 10 days ago, was the great pro-wrestling heel, the villain of the tournament, was really given a warm sendoff. It was quite an image recovery.

CHANG: All right, so now let’s go to the women’s side. There was another emerging star, Bianca Andreescu. She became Canada’s first Grand Slam title winner ever. How surprised should people be that she beat Serena Williams in straight sets?

WERTHEIM: I think to some extent, we take our cue from the player, and she, from the start of the tournament, basically said, I’m here to win. This time last year, she wasn’t anywhere close to the tennis radar. She was outside the top 100, and she’s had a terrific 2019. And here she comes, 19 years old with a very well-developed game, and stared down the mighty Serena Williams in the U.S. Open final. And we have a new start in women’s tennis.

CHANG: OK, so now that the 2019 season is over, what are you most looking forward to in 2020?

WERTHEIM: A lot. I mean, Federer, Nadal, Djokovic – the big three, we call them – they have won the last 12 majors. Nobody has sort of cracked this glass ceiling. Is 2020 the year it finally happens? And then between the emergence of young stars and this sort of big question of whether Serena Williams can finally complete this question and win her 24th major, we have 19-year-olds that are thrilling us, and we also will have a 38-year-old Serena Williams bidding for history. So, you know, overall, I would say tennis emerges from this 2019 U.S. Open in a very nice place.

CHANG: That’s Jon Wertheim of Sports Illustrated. Thanks so much for joining us today.

WERTHEIM: Anytime. Pleasure.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Telepsychiatry Helps Recruitment And Patient Care In Rural Areas

Dr. Sarfraz Khan, chief medical officer at Meridian Health Services in Indiana, connects with patients over the internet.

Yuki Noguchi/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Yuki Noguchi/NPR

It used to take at least nine months for a patient to schedule an initial appointment with a psychiatrist at Meridian Health Services in Indiana. Now, it takes days, thanks to a program that allows doctors to connect over the Internet with patients, reaching those even in remotest corners of the state.

That has also helped with recruitment. Over the last several years, Meridian’s staff of psychiatric specialists, including nurse practitioners, tripled from four to 12.

“In my opinion, it’s lifesaving,” says Dr. Sarfraz Khan, Meridian’s chief medical officer. Meridian increased its investment in telepsychiatry in the last six months, in part because of what Khan says is a burgeoning addiction crisis. “There are drugs and then more drugs and then more and more drugs.”

Growing problems with addiction and depression have made the country’s shortage of mental health professionals much more acute for rural areas. Geographic isolation exacerbates a vicious cycle. A shortage of doctors means patients can’t get timely care. The health system atrophies, and doctor recruitment gets even tougher.

As a potential workaround, telemedicine is one of the most promising and lucrative opportunities in healthcare. The way it has transformed both psychiatric care and recruitment for Meridian is a case study of its appeal.

“There was a time when we were seriously considering: Would it be viable for us to provide psychiatric services because nobody would like to come to small towns?” Khan says.

Now, such care is readily available. And it makes more money for Meridian, a provider of mental health and primary care, because Medicare and Medicaid pay more for care provided to underserved areas.

Meridian set up what it calls a “hive” in Indianapolis, where it’s easier to recruit talent. Patients drive to a local Meridian office, where a nurse measures their vitals and observes their demeanor, and sits them in front of a computer. On a split screen, the physician appears at the other end of a secure connection.

Patients seem to embrace it.

At Meridian’s offices in Muncie, Mariah, a visually arresting 20-year-old woman emerges from her first telepsychiatry appointment. She wears a metallic kitty-ear headband over a florescent green wig that matches her dramatic eye shadow.

“Yesterday, I had heart-shaped freckles that were like colored glitter, and it also looked like I was crying glitter,” she explains.

Elaborate costumes help her mask a years-long struggle with depression and anxiety, says Mariah, who declined to use her last time to protect her medical privacy.

She says she prefers talking over a computer to an in-person appointment, because it feels less confrontational. “It’s easier because they’re not there, so I feel like I can tell more, and speak more and truly just be fully real,” she says. “If they’re sitting right there, I might not want to say everything or say as much.”

For all its benefits, telemedicine hasn’t solved all of Meridian’s recruitment needs.

“In my offices, I’ve got probably close to 50 positions that are vacant,” says Gerard Cyranowski, one of the company’s vice presidents covering the eastern part of Indiana. “It’s a tight labor market, there’s a limited number of practitioners. They can name their price.”

So Cyranowski says the company is interested in expanding its use of telemedicine to address staffing challenges in other areas, including primary care and psychotherapy. In the past few months, Meridian has been using it to treat patients in emergency rooms, addiction treatment centers and even schools.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Telepsychiatry Helps Recruitment And Patient Care In Rural Areas

Dr. Sarfraz Khan, chief medical officer at Meridian Health Services in Indiana, connects with patients over the internet.

Yuki Noguchi/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Yuki Noguchi/NPR

It used to take at least nine months for a patient to schedule an initial appointment with a psychiatrist at Meridian Health Services in Indiana. Now, it takes days, thanks to a program that allows doctors to connect over the Internet with patients, reaching those even in remotest corners of the state.

That has also helped with recruitment. Over the last several years, Meridian’s staff of psychiatric specialists, including nurse practitioners, tripled from four to 12.

“In my opinion, it’s lifesaving,” says Dr. Sarfraz Khan, Meridian’s chief medical officer. Meridian increased its investment in telepsychiatry in the last six months, in part because of what Khan says is a burgeoning addiction crisis. “There are drugs and then more drugs and then more and more drugs.”

Growing problems with addiction and depression have made the country’s shortage of mental health professionals much more acute for rural areas. Geographic isolation exacerbates a vicious cycle. A shortage of doctors means patients can’t get timely care. The health system atrophies, and doctor recruitment gets even tougher.

As a potential workaround, telemedicine is one of the most promising and lucrative opportunities in healthcare. The way it has transformed both psychiatric care and recruitment for Meridian is a case study of its appeal.

“There was a time when we were seriously considering: Would it be viable for us to provide psychiatric services because nobody would like to come to small towns?” Khan says.

Now, such care is readily available. And it makes more money for Meridian, a provider of mental health and primary care, because Medicare and Medicaid pay more for care provided to underserved areas.

Meridian set up what it calls a “hive” in Indianapolis, where it’s easier to recruit talent. Patients drive to a local Meridian office, where a nurse measures their vitals and observes their demeanor, and sits them in front of a computer. On a split screen, the physician appears at the other end of a secure connection.

Patients seem to embrace it.

At Meridian’s offices in Muncie, Mariah, a visually arresting 20-year-old woman emerges from her first telepsychiatry appointment. She wears a metallic kitty-ear headband over a florescent green wig that matches her dramatic eye shadow.

“Yesterday, I had heart-shaped freckles that were like colored glitter, and it also looked like I was crying glitter,” she explains.

Elaborate costumes help her mask a years-long struggle with depression and anxiety, says Mariah, who declined to use her last time to protect her medical privacy.

She says she prefers talking over a computer to an in-person appointment, because it feels less confrontational. “It’s easier because they’re not there, so I feel like I can tell more, and speak more and truly just be fully real,” she says. “If they’re sitting right there, I might not want to say everything or say as much.”

For all its benefits, telemedicine hasn’t solved all of Meridian’s recruitment needs.

“In my offices, I’ve got probably close to 50 positions that are vacant,” says Gerard Cyranowski, one of the company’s vice presidents covering the eastern part of Indiana. “It’s a tight labor market, there’s a limited number of practitioners. They can name their price.”

So Cyranowski says the company is interested in expanding its use of telemedicine to address staffing challenges in other areas, including primary care and psychotherapy. In the past few months, Meridian has been using it to treat patients in emergency rooms, addiction treatment centers and even schools.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Rafael Nadal Claims His 19th Grand Slam Title With U.S. Open Triumph

Rafael Nadal brandishes the spoils of his U.S. Open final victory over Russian Daniil Medvedev on Sunday. The Spaniard’s win in New York City — his fourth U.S. Open title — gives him 19 career individual grand slam wins, just one shy of rival Roger Federer’s record.

Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images

Rafael Nadal enjoys a well-earned reputation as tennis’ long-reigning king of clay — but on Sunday, Nadal reminded the world he’s anything but a one-surface wonder. The 33-year-old Spaniard reasserted his mastery of the hard court, as well, claiming his fourth career U.S. Open title over an opponent roughly a decade his junior.

Nadal defeated Daniil Medvedev in a five-set humdinger in New York City, 7-5, 6-3, 5-7, 4-6, 6-4. To do it, he had to fend off a furious rally by the 23-year-old Russian, who, after ceding the first two sets to Nadal, stormed back to push his celebrated opponent to the brink — and extend the marathon match’s final running time to nearly five hours.

But Nadal ultimately steadied his course, breaking Medvedev’s serve twice in the final to seal the victory and buttress his position in the record books. The win makes for his second Grand Slam title of the year, after he won the French Openyet again — in June. It also gives him his 19th career Grand Slam, placing him just one title behind arch-rival Roger Federer, who currently owns the men’s singles record.

After the match, Nadal wept as the stadium in Flushing Meadows played a string of highlights from his career. He called it “one of the most emotional nights of my tennis career.”

Not a dry eye in the house after this match!

?: @usopen | @RafaelNadal | #USOpen pic.twitter.com/Iuv0kuthxg

— ATP Tour (@ATP_Tour) September 9, 2019

“The last three hours of the match have been very, very intense, no?” Nadal said. “Very tough mentally and physically, too.”

No kidding.

For all the history Nadal brought to Sunday’s match, and all the edge in experience he had over Medvedev — a newcomer to the U.S. Open final — Nadal’s win did not come easily. Despite clinching the first two sets, the Spaniard saw the next two slip away on broken serves. What looked early on like a possible cruise to triumph ended up taking about 4 hours, 50 minutes, in what became one of the longest matches of Nadal’s considerable career.

Rafael Nadal splays across the court after fending off a furious comeback attempt by Daniil Medvedev on Sunday. Nadal won the marathon match, but it took him five sets in New York City to do it: 7-5, 6-3, 5-7, 4-6, 6-4.

Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images

“The way that he was able to fight, to change the rhythm of the match, was just incredible,” Nadal acknowledged afterward.

Medvedev, for his part, made clear that the respect was mutual.

“What you’ve done for tennis in general,” he told Nadal at the trophy ceremony, calling his career Grand Slam total simply “outrageous.” “I mean, I think 100 million kids watching you play want to play tennis, and it’s amazing for our sport.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

How A Prenatal ‘Bootcamp’ For New Dads Helps The Whole Family

Joe Bay (center), coach of a New York City “Bootcamp for New Dads,” instructs Adewale Oshodi (left) and George Pasco in how to cradle an infant for best soothing.

Jason LeCras for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Jason LeCras for NPR

“Before I became a dad, the thought of struggling to soothe my crying baby terrified me,” says Yaka Oyo, 37, a new father who lives in New York City. Like many first-time parents, Oyo worried he would misread his newborn baby’s cues.

“I pictured myself pleading with my baby saying, ‘What do you want?’ “

Oyo’s anxieties are common to many first-time mothers and fathers. One reason parents-to-be sign up for prenatal classes, is to have their questions, such as ‘What’s the toughest part of parenting?’ and ‘How do I care for my newborn baby?’ answered by childcare experts.

However, though prenatal classes show both parents how to swaddle, soothe, and comfort their infants, they are usually aimed mostly at the mom — discussing her shifting role and how to cope with the bundle of emotions motherhood brings.

With that focus, “Dad’s parenting questions can fall to the wayside,” says Dr. Craig Garfield, a professor at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine and an attending physician at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago. And the lack of attention to a new father’s needs can have ripple effects that impact the whole family — in the short-run and later, Garfield says.

Around the U.S., a number of health care providers, such as Garfield in Chicago and the non-profit ‘Bootcamp for New Dads’ in New York City, have begun trying to change their approach to such classes. Some go so far as to hold single-sex prenatal classes specifically for men.

“Because each parent holds a separate role in their child’s life, expectant mothers and fathers may seek different answers to their parenting questions,” Garfield explains.

Indeed, raising children is nothing new, but parenting culture has shifted in the U.S., over time. For instance, compared to parents of the 1960s, today’s mothers and fathers tend to focus more of their time and money on their children, a recent study suggests, adopting what sociologists call an “intensive parenting” style.

Parental worries about their kids’ academic success and future financial stability may drive this parenting philosophy, researchers say.

These mounting responsibilities can stress the family, which is why mothers and fathers may feel eager to define their parenting roles. While a new mother’s role in modern society is often directed by her baby’s needs to breastfeed, cuddle and sleep; a new father’s role isn’t always spelled out.

Dads-to-be learn how to change diapers in the workshop for and by men, at the New York Langone Medical Center. Participants say they appreciate the combination of concrete skills and candid advice from other fathers.

Jason LeCras for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Jason LeCras for NPR

“Even though fathers are far from secondary in their children’s lives, they may feel uncertain about their place in the family,” says Julian Redwood, a psychotherapist in San Francisco who counsels dads.

In fact, Garfield says, as they await their baby’s arrival, men, like women, often worry about the hands-on tasks of childcare, how to raise well-adjusted kids, and about how to cope with sleep deprivation, especially after they return to work.

Addressing those concerns early helps dads get involved with parenting from the outset, and that bolsters the whole family’s health — maybe especially the baby’s — according to research by pediatricians and child psychologists. For example, a 2017 study found that the amount of hands-on, sensitive engagement dads were observed to have with babies at age 4 months and 24 months correlated positively with the baby’s cognitive development at age 2.

Early father involvement also benefits the health of the child by fostering sturdier father-child bonds and psychological resilience, researchers say.

Oyo says the three-hour-long, Sunday Bootcamp for New Dads session he attended at NYU Langone Medical center, helped ease his early fears. At the peer-led workshop, “I learned babies communicate through crying,” he says, “and that they usually cry for four reasons — which made infant care seem less scary.”

Joe Bay, a 44-year-old father who lives in Clifton, N.J., was the session’s coach. Calling the course a “bootcamp” acknowledges the ambivalent relationship dads may feel between childcare duties and societal views of masculinity, Bay says. It also speaks to the practicality of what the men can expect to learn — how to hold a tiny baby, for example, or how to soothe a crying infant.

Participants also learn how parenthood can rock their partner’s well-being — and upend their own emotional health, as it rattles their sense of identity.

Future fathers get a chance in the course to question Bootcamp grads. Bay says he finds many fathers-to-be more willing to open up when their partners are absent. Oyo concurs.

“I met a dad who seemed like a ‘pro’ with his infant son, which was reassuring,” Oyo says. Learning from that man how to change a diaper and how to swaddle a baby, he says, helped him stay calm later, when facing his own wailing daughter. In the class he’d learned how to “read her cues.”

As the dads get more secure in their parenting skills, the moms usually become less anxious, too. And that’s crucial in making sure a behavioral tendency family scientists call “maternal gatekeeping” doesn’t derail the family system.

“Maternal gatekeeping encompasses a set of behaviors that mothers may use — consciously or unknowingly — that limit the father’s involvement with their children,” explains Anna Olsavsky, a doctoral candidate in human development and family science at The Ohio State University, and lead author of a 2019 study of how such “gatekeeping” influences a budding family.

Gatekeeping behaviors can be small but powerful: micromanaging dad’s interaction with the baby, for example, or criticizing how he holds or feeds the child.

Though fathers have always been somewhat involved in their children’s care, Olsavsky says, society still deems mothers “childcare experts.”

“That portrayal can lead dads to be socialized into supportive parenting roles” she adds — in other words, they take a step back.

In their most recent study, Olsavsky and her colleagues found that men who felt welcomed by their partners to participate in child rearing felt more connected to their partners, and were more likely to identify as equally involved and responsible co-parents.

Guests of the class Jesse Applegate (center) and his son, Jacob, field questions from Saxon Eldridge (left), and Chris De Souza (right) about what to expect after the baby’s born.

Jason LeCras for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Jason LeCras for NPR

Oyo, whose daughter is now nine-months-old, says the bootcamp helped him take an active lead in parenting. It was also a relief to his pregnant wife, he says, to see that he was studying up for fatherhood.

After the course,” Oyo says, “I shared everything I had learned, and once the baby was born, I became the trusted source for swaddling.”

Garfield tells prospective fathers that the art of proper swaddling, a method of wrapping babies that soothes them in the first couple of months, can be one of ‘dads secret parenting weapons.’ Additional tools include using a low voice to talk or sing to the baby, Garfield adds, or playing with the newborn during diaper changing time.

Learning these parenting techniques and the dynamics that develop when one new parent feels sidelined can be just as useful for adoptive parents and same-sex couples, Bay notes.

For all parents, raising children can feel a bit like being thrust into an ocean without knowing how to swim. But having an outlet where each caregiver can connect and learn from their peers helps make parenting less lonely. And it dismantles the myth of the ‘perfect parent.’

Greater parental harmony can help decrease spousal friction, which tends to rise when sleep deprivation and a lack of control are at an all-time high.

Reducing parental bickering pays off for the baby, too: Research suggests constant arguments can have an impact on a child’s brain development, disrupt healthy attachment, and raise a child’s risk of becoming anxious and depressed later in life.

Many mothers and fathers enter the wild ride of parenting hoping to be ‘expert parents.’ That’s a big mistake, Bay tells participants in his Bootcamp workshops.

“I always tell dads the goal isn’t to be ‘perfect,’ ” he says, “but ‘good enough.’ “

Juli Fraga is a psychologist and writer in San Francisco. You can find her on Twitter @dr_fraga.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bianca Andreescu Snatches Historic Victory From Serena Williams, Wins 1st Grand Slam

Bianca Andreescu reacts after defeating Serena Williams in the women’s singles final of the U.S. Open.

Adam Hunger/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Adam Hunger/AP

Updated at 9:35 p.m. ET

Canadian Bianca Andreescu beat Serena Williams (6-3, 7-5) at the U.S. Open on Saturday, becoming the first Canadian to win a Grand Slam singles title.

Her victory at Arthur Ashe Stadium — the site of Williams’ first Grand Slam win in 1999 — kept Williams from tying Australia’s Margaret Court’s all-time record of 24 Grand Slam titles.

Andreescu returned a weak serve from Williams with a reliable forehand to seal the game. Then, her face in disbelief, 19-year-old Andreescu hugged Williams at the net and fell to the blue court, basking in her feat.

“Being able to play on this stage against Serena, a true legend in this sport, is amazing,” said Andreescu, after winning her first major final appearance. “Oh, man, it wasn’t easy at all.”

For Andreescu — born the year after Williams won her first major title at the U.S. Open — the victory capped an impressive run at this year’s tournament. She became the first Canadian to reach a Grand Slam finals. And despite setbacks from a shoulder injury, the Romanian Canadian’s play helped her rise to 15th in the Women’s Tennis Association rankings entering her match against Williams. She was ranked 208 last summer.

Andreescu appeared fearless in the face of her more experienced rival. Her risky coin-toss choice to receive against a master server ended up in her favor. Serena double faulted to hand Andreescu a winning first set that she’d dominated with spin serves fans are used to seeing from Williams and aggressive returns.

In the second set, Williams began to turn over her game. She closed a 1-5 down gap after a stunning rally that drew deafening roars from the crowd, prompting Andreescu to cover her ears.

Asked about her most trying moment to seal the win, Andreescu replied, “Definitely the crowd.”

“I know you wanted Serena to win — I’m sorry!”

Serena Williams scores a point against Bianca Andreescu on Saturday.

Adam Hunger/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Adam Hunger/AP

The match represented another difficult loss for the 37-year-old Williams since her return to tennis last year after the birth of her daughter in 2017. Since her return, she has tried unsuccessfully four times to match the record for most Grand Slam wins.

“I’m just so proud that I’m out here and competing at this level. My team has been so supportive through all the ups and downs and downs and downs and downs,” Williams said. “Hopefully, we’ll have some ups soon.”

The only other match-up between Williams and Andreescu was cut short when Williams suffered a back injury in the Rogers Cup final in Toronto last month. Andreescu took home that title. Impressed by her rival’s sportsmanship after the match, Williams called Andreescu an “old soul.”

Both attribute their success to a strong mental game as much as a physical one. Andreescu has spoken about her pregame meditation ritual.

As for Williams, she says the stress of contending with other tennis superstars might be less taxing than motherhood.

“I think being on the court is almost a little bit more relaxing than hanging out with a 2-year-old that’s dragging you everywhere,” Williams told USA Today after a commanding semifinals performance against Ukraine’s Elina Svitolina on Thursday. “I think that’s kind of been a little helpful.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Colombia Is Turning Into A Major Medical Marijuana Producer

Workers prune marijuana plants at a Clever Leaves greenhouse in Pesca, Colombia. The company employs over 450 people.

Courtesy of Clever Leaves


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Clever Leaves

Patricia Santiago and her family were forced to flee their home near Colombia’s Caribbean coast after complaining about neighborhood dope dealers who, in turn, threatened to kill them. But in an odd twist, Santiago now works in the drug trade — at a medical marijuana facility.

At first, Santiago felt like she was breaking the law as she pruned and clipped cannabis plants on a plantation run by a Colombian firm called Clever Leaves. However, the government legalized medical marijuana in 2016 and now Clever Leaves is exporting cannabis-based products to Canada and the United Kingdom.

Rather than a symbol of the country’s dark past of narco-fueled violence, Santiago smiles and says, Colombian drugs “can now be used to treat people.”

At least that’s the bet of a growing number of entrepreneurs who are building vast marijuana plantations and state-of-the-art pharmaceutical laboratories that produce everything from cannabis-based pain relievers for cancer patients to dog treats that act as calming agents.

Other countries are passing laws to permit the production, import and export of medical marijuana but Colombia has a leg up because it did so three years ago, says Rodrigo Arcila, president of the Colombian Cannabis Industry Association. He said the group’s 29 member companies have invested more than $600 million in building medical marijuana facilities.

Arcila maintains that Colombia can produce cannabis products at lower prices than competitors due to affordable land, relatively low wages and an abundance of skilled farm hands who cut their teeth in Colombia’s booming flower business.

Colombia sits near the equator, giving it 12 hours of daily sunlight year-round. By contrast, countries with seasonal variations require the extensive use of artificial lights, which drives up production costs.

“This is a marvelous opportunity in a country where drugs have caused so many problems,” Arcila says.

Colombia is already well-known as a major marijuana supplier. In the 1960s and 1970s, tons of illegal Colombian cannabis, mostly grown in the Sierra Nevada mountains near the Caribbean coast, were smuggled into the United States.

But marijuana traffickers, including the late drug lord Pablo Escobar, soon switched to cocaine, which was far more profitable. That made Colombia ground zero for the war on drugs, a conflict that in the 1980s and ’90s killed thousands of Colombians, police and army soldiers, anti-drug agents, judges and politicians.

In recent years Colombia — like Canada, several European and Latin American nations and many U.S. states — has taken a more permissive stance on pot. Since the mid-1990s, Colombian courts have upheld the right of individuals to possess up to 20 grams of marijuana, though a government decree last year banned people from using drugs in public.

An aerial view of the Clever Leaves plantation in Pesca. It currently covers 37 acres and plans to expand cultivation to over 200 acres of marijuana plants by 2021.

Courtesy of Clever Leaves


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Clever Leaves

As an emerging venture it’s unclear how the medical marijuana business will play out. For example, it remains illegal to import marijuana-based products into the United States. Due to government bureaucracy in Colombia, it can take months or years for startups to secure the proper permits and licenses.

Yet the uncertainty hasn’t stopped companies from betting big on cannabis. Khiron, a Canadian firm founded in 2017 and based in Colombia’s capital of Bogotá, now has marijuana plantations in this country as well as Chile and Uruguay. CEO Álvaro Torres, a 40-year-old Colombian engineer, says one reason he got involved in the business was the occurrence of so many high-profile deaths, including the music star Prince, from opioid-based drugs.

“So I look at that and say: ‘Why not cannabis which has less hazardous effects for the body?” Torres says.

Julián Wilches is the co-founder of Clever Leaves. Before getting into medical marijuana, he used to work on drug policy at Colombia’s Justice Ministry.

John Otis for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

John Otis for NPR

Julián Wilches, who co-founded Clever Leaves in 2016, used to work for the Colombian Justice Ministry combating the illegal narcotics industry. But he has fully embraced medical cannabis.

“I feel great about doing this,” Wilches says during a tour of the Clever Leaves facility in the town of Pesca, a four-hour drive from Bogotá. “This is the right way to use controlled substances.”

The land around Pesca has long been used for potato and dairy farming, but it’s now home to 37 acres of marijuana bushes. Clever Leaves intends to increase the acreage to more than 200 by 2021, in its quest to become the world’s largest medical marijuana company.

Inside green houses, Clever Leaves workers wearing smocks and rubber gloves water, prune and clip the cannabis plants which grow to a height of about five feet before they are harvested. The flowers, which are rich in chemical compounds called cannabinoids, are then dried and ground into a powder that is turned into oils, extracts and crystals at a Clever Leaves laboratory.

“Pharmaceuticals always come from the global north to South America to Africa to Asia,” Wilches says “This is something that is changing that model. This is from Colombia to the world.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)