Nationals Beat Astros 7-2 In Game 6 Of The World Series, Forcing Game 7

The Washington Nationals congratulate Anthony Rendon after his two-run home run during the seventh inning of Game 6 of the World Series against the Houston Astros on Tuesday.
Matt Slocum/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Matt Slocum/AP
Updated Wednesday at 2:05 a.m. ET
The Washington Nationals avoided elimination by beating the Houston Astros 7-2 in Game 6 of the 2019 World Series, forcing a Game 7 in Houston on Wednesday.
But even a Series-defining Game 7 could have a tough time matching the tension and drama of Game 6 which featured a controversial call that appeared to kill — at least temporarily — a Washington rally.
Nationals starter Stephen Strasburg was the winning pitcher, lasting eight and a third innings, striking out seven while allowing only two runs on five hits.
Astros ace starter Justin Verlander was the losing pitcher. He pitched five innings, surrendering three runs on five hits and three walks, with three strikeouts. It was Verlander’s second loss of this series and he is 0-6 as a starting pitcher in seven career World Series games.
The Nationals drew first blood to open the game on a run-scoring single by third baseman Anthony Rendon — who delivered five RBIs before the night was out — after lead-off batter Trea Turner hit an infield single and advanced to second base on a sacrifice bunt by right-fielder Adam Eaton.
But Houston struck back immediately in their half of the first inning with a sacrifice fly by second baseman José Altuve after a first-pitch double by center-fielder George Springer, who took third base on a wild pitch by the Nats’ Strasburg. One out later, third baseman Alex Bregman hit a solo homer that gave Houston a 2-1 lead.
But those would prove to be all the runs the Astros would score.
After cruising through the second inning, the Astros’ Verlander had to pitch out of jams in the third and fourth innings, stranding two Nationals runners in both frames.
Washington, which had scored only three runs in the previous three games they had lost at home, finally capitalized in the fifth inning. Eaton and left fielder Juan Soto each hit solo homers to take the lead 3-2.
Houston threatened in the bottom of the fifth inning after right-fielder Josh Reddick singled and Springer followed with his second double of the night. But that was all the Astros got off Strasburg, who retired the next two batters.
Astros reliever Brad Peacock opened the sixth inning in place of Verlander, who had thrown 93 pitches.
Call upheld.
Unreal.
What a failure.
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) October 30, 2019
That is an absolutely awful call… what are we doin?
— Jake Arrieta (@JArrieta34) October 30, 2019
Not interference in last year’s World Series pic.twitter.com/miwMTFcXfJ
— Red Sox Stats (@redsoxstats) October 30, 2019
The seventh inning opened with a sequence of plays that will likely be talked about for a long time.
After a single by Nationals catcher Yan Gomes, the next batter, Turner, appeared to have beaten out a dribbler to the reliever Peacock who threw late to first base. The throw got past first baseman Yuli Gurriel as the runners advanced.
But Turner was called out for running inside the base path and interfering with Peacock’s throw. After a lengthy delay in which the umpires consulted league officials in New York, the call on the field was confirmed.
So instead of having runners at second and third with no outs, the Nationals had a runner at first with one out. But a batter later, the Nationals’ Rendon launched a two-run home run that extended their lead to 5-2.
Strasburg retired the Astros without incident in the seventh and eighth innings. He was pulled for reliever Sean Doolittle after retiring the first batter he faced in the ninth.
The 2019 World Series is the first postseason series across professional baseball, hockey and basketball in which the road team won the first six games.
Boeing CEO Faces Tough Questions From Lawmakers Over Safety Of 737 Max
Boeing’s CEO faced tough questions on Capitol Hill Tuesday about design flaws that caused two deadly 737 Max plane crashes. Though admitting making mistakes, some of his answers angered lawmakers.
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
The CEO of Boeing faced withering criticism today over the company’s role in the crashes of two 737 MAX airplanes. Dennis Muilenburg was testifying before a Senate committee – tomorrow, same drill before a House committee. The first of those crashes happened exactly one year ago in Indonesia, and that was when a Lion Air jet plummeted into the Java Sea shortly after takeoff. The other crash was in Ethiopia this past March. NPR’s David Schaper joins me.
Hey, David.
DAVID SCHAPER, BYLINE: Good afternoon.
KELLY: Hey. Does – so describe the mood in that Senate hearing room today.
SCHAPER: You know, it was both somber and tense at times. You know, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg sat at a table with the company’s chief engineer John Hamilton. Well, right behind them – just a couple of rows behind them – were several family members and loved ones of some of the 346 people who died in the crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. And Muilenburg emotionally addressed them first.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
DENNIS MUILENBURG: On behalf of myself and the Boeing company, we are sorry – deeply and truly sorry.
SCHAPER: Muilenburg went on to acknowledge that the company made mistakes and got some things wrong with the 737 MAX. He talked about some new safety protocols and procedures that the company is instilling and also some new channels for employees who have their own safety concerns – how they can raise those internally at the company.
KELLY: So he’s talking about changes they want to make going forward, but did he get into specifics about what went wrong?
SCHAPER: He did. He admitted that both crashes involved this new flight control system that activated in response to a single faulty sensor, and the company’s chief engineer acknowledged that there was a – they made a mistake by not adequately testing it. Senators demanded to know, though, how that system, called MCAS, could have had a single point of failure and – when redundancies have now long been the norm in aviation engineering. They also demanded to know why pilots were not even told that the safety critical system existed. With some of the audience holding up pictures of those killed in the crash, Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal tore into Muilenburg.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL: Those pilots never had a chance. These loved ones never had a chance. They were in flying coffins as a result of Boeing deciding that it was going to conceal MCAS from the pilots.
KELLY: You do get a sense of the tension in that room today from just listening to that tape. David, I want to ask about a couple lines of reporting that you have been following as you’ve worked this story – that allegations of pressure inside Boeing to speed the development and the certification of this plane and also whether the FAA and Boeing got a little bit too cozy. Did that come out in this – in the hearing today?
SCHAPER: You know, this was one of those things that the senators asked about time and time again and tried to pressure CEO Muilenburg about. He acknowledged that, you know, scrutiny of Boeing’s safety culture is certainly warranted and fair. But he still would not agree with those who contend that safety sometimes took a back seat to profitability at the corner – at the company, nor that, you know, any corners were cut in order to keep costs down. He also disagreed with characterizations that the company had become too cozy with the FAA.
When pressed on recently revealed internal messages between senior pilots at the company – this was from three years ago, and these pilots detailed problems with the flight control system – Muilenburg told the committee he knew about these early this year but that he just knew that they existed; he never actually read them. And that set off Republican Ted Cruz, who chairs the Aviation Subcommittee. He was just livid.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
TED CRUZ: You’re the CEO. The buck stops with you. Did you read this document? And how did your team not put it in front of you, run in with their hair on fire, saying, we got a real problem here? How did that not happen, and what does that say about the culture at Boeing?
SCHAPER: Muilenburg’s response was that he just turned it over to legal counsel and thought that they would take care of it and put these through the proper channels. Other senators got mad, accusing Muilenburg of half-truths and misleading information.
KELLY: Right.
SCHAPER: And some pressed the CEO on why the company pushed regulators to allow these MAX planes all around the world to keep flying after they first crashed.
KELLY: David, we’ll leave it there. That’s NPR’s David Schaper.
Thanks.
Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Firms Seeking Top Workers Find They Can’t Offer Only High-Deductible Health Plans

For the third year in a row, the percentage of companies that offer high-deductible plans as the sole health insurance option will decline in 2020, according to a survey of large employers by the National Business Group on Health.
PeopleImages/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
PeopleImages/Getty Images
Everything old is new again. As open enrollment gets underway for next year’s job-based health insurance coverage, some employees are seeing traditional plans offered alongside or instead of the plans with sky-high deductibles that may have been their only choice in the past.
Some employers say that in a tight labor market, offering a more generous plan with a deductible that’s less than four figures can be an attractive recruitment tool. Plus, a more traditional plan may appeal to workers who want more predictable out-of-pocket costs, even if the premium is a bit higher.
That’s what happened at Digital River, a 650-person global e-commerce payment processing business based in Minnetonka, Minn.
Four years ago, faced with premium increases approaching double-digit percentages, Digital River ditched its traditional preferred provider organization plan in favor of three high-deductible plans. Each had different deductibles and different premiums, but all linked to health savings accounts that are exempt from taxes.
This year, though, the company added back two traditional preferred provider plans to its offerings for workers.
Even with three plan options, “we still had employees who said they wanted other choices,” says KT Schmidt, the company’s chief administrative officer.
Digital River isn’t the only company broadening its offerings. For the third year in a row, the percentage of companies that offer high-deductible plans as the sole option will decline in 2020, according to a survey of large employers by the National Business Group on Health. A quarter of the firms polled will offer these plans as the only option next year — down 14 percentage points from two years ago.
That said, high-deductible plans are hardly disappearing. Fifty-eight percent of covered employees worked at companies that offered a high-deductible plan with a savings account in 2019, according to an annual survey of employer health benefits released by the Kaiser Family Foundation last month.
That was second only to the 76% of covered workers who were at firms that offered a PPO plan. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation; it is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.)
When Digital River switched to exclusively high-deductible plans for 2016, the firm put some of the $1 million it saved into the new health savings accounts that employees could use to cover their out-of-pocket expenses before reaching the deductible.
Employees could also contribute to those accounts to save money for medical expenses. This year the deductibles on those plans are $1,850, $2,700 and $3,150 for single coverage, and $3,750, $5,300 and $6,300 for family plans.
The company put a lot of effort into educating employees about how the new plans work, Schmidt says. Premiums are typically lower in high-deductible plans. But under federal rules, until people reach their deductible, the plans pay only for specified preventive care, such as annual physicals and cancer screenings, and some care for chronic conditions.
Enrollees are on the hook for everything else, including most doctor visits and prescription drugs. In 2020, the minimum deductible for a plan that qualifies under federal rules for a tax-exempt health savings account is $1,400 for an individual and $2,800 for a family.
As their health savings account balances grew, “more people moved into the camp that could see the benefits” of the high-deductible strategy, Schmidt says. Still, not everyone wanted to be exposed to costs upfront, even if they ended up spending less overall.
“For some people, there remained a desire to pay more to simply have that peace of mind,” he says.
Digital River’s PPOs have deductibles of $400 and $900 for single coverage and $800 and $1,800 for families. The premiums are significantly more expensive than those of the high-deductible plans.
In the PPO plan with the $400/$800 deductible, the employee’s portion of the monthly premium ranges from $82.37 for single coverage to $356.46 for an employee plus two or more family members. The plan with the $2,700 deductible costs an employee $21.11 for single coverage, and the $5,300-deductible plan costs $160.29 for the employee plus at least two others.
But costs are more predictable in the PPO plan. Instead of owing the entire cost of a doctor visit or trip to the emergency room until they reach their annual deductible, people in the PPO plans generally owe set copayments or coinsurance charges for most types of care.
When Digital River introduced the PPO plans for this year, about 10% of employees moved from the high-deductible plans to the traditional plans.
Open enrollment for 2020 starts this fall, and the company is offering the same mix of traditional and high-deductible plans again for next year.
Adding PPOs to its roster of plans not only made employees happy but also made the company more competitive, Schmidt says. Two of Digital River’s biggest competitors offer only high-deductible plans, and the PPOs give Digital River an edge in attracting top talent, he believes.
According to the survey by the National Business Group on Health, employers that opted to add more choices to what they offered employees typically chose a traditional PPO plan. Members in these plans generally get the most generous coverage if they use providers in the plan’s network.
But if they go out of network, plans often cover that as well, though they pay a smaller proportion of the costs. For the most part, deductibles are lower than the federal minimum for qualified high-deductible plans.
Traditional plans like PPOs also give employers more flexibility to try different approaches to improve employees’ health, says Tracy Watts, a senior partner at benefits consultant Mercer.
“Some of the newer strategies that employers want to try just aren’t [health savings account] compatible,” says Watts. The firms might want to pay for care before the deductible is met, for example, or eliminate employee charges for certain services.
Examples of these strategies could include employer-subsidized telemedicine programs or direct primary care arrangements in which physicians are paid a monthly fee to provide care at no cost to the employee.
The “Cadillac tax,” a provision of the Affordable Care Act that would impose a 40% excise tax on the value of health plans that exceeded certain dollar thresholds, was a driving force behind the shift toward high-deductible plans. But the tax, originally supposed to take effect in 2018, has been pushed back to 2022. The House passed a bill repealing the tax in July, and there is a companion bill in the Senate.
It’s unclear what will happen, but employers appear to be taking the uncertainty in stride, says Brian Marcotte, president and CEO of the National Business Group on Health.
“I think employers don’t believe it’s going to happen, and that’s one of the reasons you’re seeing [more plan choices] introduced,” he says.
Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit, editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation. KHN is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.