August 19, 2019

No Image

Business Roundtable Issues Statement On The Need To Help Deal With Income Inequality

A group of 181 CEOs have issued a statement proclaiming the need to help deal with income inequality and working conditions. NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly talks with New York Times reporter David Gelles.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

The nation’s most powerful business executives have issued what amounts to a new mission statement. It moves away from the view that shareholder profits trump all other goals. The new statement out today and signed by executives on the Business Roundtable asserts the following. Quote, “Americans deserve an economy that allows each person to succeed through hard work and creativity and to lead a life of meaning and dignity.” Back in 1997, the Business Roundtable said the main objective of a business enterprise was to generate economic returns for its owners. Reporter David Gelles is following this story for The New York Times. He’s with us now.

Hey, David.

DAVID GELLES: Hi.

KELLY: What prompted this statement? Why now?

GELLES: For years now, business has been getting more and more wrapped up in some of the social and political debates roiling this country. And at a moment when Senator Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are really pointing fingers at business, CEOs finally realized they needed to try to recast the public’s perception of what it is business is here for.

KELLY: Practically, does this change anything? What does this mission statement actually do?

GELLES: What they’re trying to do is not so much say – every one of these companies is going to adopt a certain policy. Instead, what they’re trying to do is redefine how the public thinks of what businesses are here for. For the longest time, there’s been this notion that the primary role of business is to increase shareholder value. Finally, businesses are getting around to saying, maybe that’s not all we’re supposed to be doing. Maybe we do need to be taking care of our workers. Maybe we do need to be taking care of the environment. Maybe we do need to be taking our suppliers and treating them fairly. Now, again, these are lofty sentiments. But we have yet to see is exactly how the Business Roundtable proposes all these companies go about doing that.

KELLY: Right. I can imagine some people listening might listen to the lofty sentiments and, even if they like them, say, how about some not quite so lofty but more practical sentiments like maybe pushing for a $15-an-hour minimum wage or paid paternal leave or other things that might practically help the lives of employees of these big corporations?

GELLES: I spoke to the CEOs of many of these companies today, and they’ll all be quick to point out, hey. We actually do take pretty good care of our workers. And, hey, we do have lofty and laudable parental and family leave. I think what we’re seeing, though, is a real disconnect between what individual companies do and how the broader business community is perceived by the public because we can see, even if one company has a great leave policy, we’re still at a moment when the divide between rich and poor is widening in this country and at a moment when the environmental problems we’re all facing collectively are getting worse. And so what they’re trying to do and are going to have to figure out is how to translate this sort of collective sentiment of goodwill into real action that everyday Americans sense when they go about their daily lives.

KELLY: Would I be completely cynical to ask if these CEOs might still have their eye on the bottom line in the sense that if they are seen as, quote, “good companies working in the greater public interest” that that might, ultimately, be good for the bottom line?

GELLES: I don’t even think that’s cynical. They would agree with you. They would say that, hey. If we take good care of our employees and we take good care of the environment, ultimately, in the long term, we’re going to have a better and more sustainable business.

KELLY: That’s David Gelles, business reporter for The New York Times. He’s got a column there called Corner Office.

David Gelles, thanks.

GELLES: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF WEI, THE FIELD TAPES AND PORT GEORGE’S “BORDERS”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Planned Parenthood May Reject Federal Funds Over Changes To Title X

It appears some health care providers that offer birth control, such as Planned Parenthood, are going to withdraw from the federal Title X program. Changes to Title X take effect Monday.



NOEL KING, HOST:

About 4 million low-income Americans get birth control and other kinds of reproductive health care through a federal program called Title X. The Trump administration is making some changes to that program, and they’re set to take effect today. Because of those changes, Planned Parenthood and some other providers say they’re going to withdraw from Title X. NPR correspondent Sarah McCammon covers reproductive rights. She’s with me now. Hi, Sarah.

SARAH MCCAMMON, BYLINE: Good morning.

KING: So a lot at stake here, apparently. What exactly is changing with Title X today?

MCCAMMON: Well, today is a key deadline that the Trump administration has set for recipients of these Title X funds to confirm that they’re making a good faith effort to comply with new rules set by the administration for the program. And that means it’s likely that a substantial number of health care providers around the country that provide these services, most notably Planned Parenthood clinics, are going to withdraw from the Title X program by the end of the day, at least that’s the way it appears.

This is a big program, Noel. It’s $286 million each year. It covers contraceptive services, STD screenings – things like that. And under these new rules, any organization that provides abortions or advises patients on how to get them – except in a few cases like rape, incest and medical emergencies – will not be able to get these funds to provide other services.

KING: OK, so Planned Parenthood is a huge organization. It is used – its services are used by a lot of women. It’s refusing to comply with these rules. Why?

MCCAMMON: Right. Well, they call the rule a gag rule. I spoke with Planned Parenthood’s acting president, Alexis McGill Johnson, and she said it interferes with the doctor-patient relationship.

ALEXIS MCGILL JOHNSON: Imagine if you show up as a patient to a health center and the doctor’s only ability is to refer you to prenatal care, and you may have already decided that you would like to have an abortion, federal regulations will ban that doctor from actually giving you the advice and referring you to abortion.

MCCAMMON: And Planned Parenthood made a last-ditch plea last week to a federal appeals court asking them to block the rule. That request was turned down on Friday. And Planned Parenthood had said this will effectively force them out of Title X, which is a pretty big deal because the organization has been a major part of the program for decades, and they say they serve about 40% of those 4 million people nationwide who get those services through this program.

And while it’s not just Planned Parenthood, for example, Maine Family Planning and some other organizations are also pulling out.

KING: Just quickly – what is the Trump administration saying in response to these groups saying, we’re just not going to be a part of this?

MCCAMMON: Well, they say that all providers of reproductive health care through this program just have to comply with the rule – either stop performing abortions or referring patients for them, and they can stay in. In a statement, the administration said that Planned Parenthood is, quote, “actually choosing to place a higher priority on the ability to refer for abortion instead of continuing to receive federal funds.”

The rule is a big victory, too, for opponents of abortion rights, who’ve pushed for a long time to cut public dollars to Planned Parenthood. I talked to a spokeswoman for the anti-abortion group the SBA List this weekend. She said Planned Parenthood is demonstrating, quote, “how committed they are to performing abortion.”

KING: But what does this mean for all of those low-income patients who use Title X?

MCCAMMON: It’s not entirely clear what happens next. Planned Parenthood and Maine Family Planning, for example, had stopped using these funds already a few weeks ago and were patching through with other types of funding. But I’m told that cannot continue indefinitely, so some services may be scaled back or cut. Patients may have to pay more for things like birth control.

And the groups that support this rule, though, are pointing out that there are thousands of other organizations, like community health centers, that don’t offer abortions that also get these funds. But a lot of patients go to Planned Parenthood and similar groups, and they’re used to going there for this kind of care, so this does represent a big shift. We’re also expecting to hear more from Planned Parenthood today about their legal strategy and how they plan to move forward now that this rule is taking effect.

KING: All right, we’ll keep an eye on that. NPR correspondent Sarah McCammon. Thanks, Sarah.

MCCAMMON: Thank you.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)