Toys R Us Is Coming Back But With A Different Approach

The retailer is rebranding itself with smaller stores and a focus on events and activities.
Toys “R” Us
hide caption
toggle caption
Toys “R” Us
Toys R Us is rising from the ashes. Now Americans may not have to go another Christmas without its once beloved toy store.
The retailer is making a comeback in time for the 2019 holiday season with a new approach. Instead of providing mile-long aisles filled with a plethora of toys, the company is switching its focus to smaller stores that will feature interactive toy demonstrations, spaces for special events like birthday parties, new activities every day and open play areas.
The plan was announced Thursday after Tru Kids Brand, the parent of Toys R Us, entered a joint venture with the startup b8ta, which owns a chain of “experiential” stores. The retailer has relaunched its website, touting an experience “centered around product discovery and engagement.”
Although preferences and consumer shopping habits have changed over the years, “what hasn’t changed is that kids want to touch everything and simply “play,” said Phillip Raub, president of b8ta and interim co-CEO of the Toys R Us joint venture.
Consumers will have the opportunity to play with toys displayed out of the box before potentially purchasing them. The company believes that this immersive experience, for example, will help it track patterns and measure how in-store retail experiences effect online sales.
The first new stores will be in Texas and New Jersey.
Toys “R” Us
hide caption
toggle caption
Toys “R” Us
After officially closing its doors in nearly 200 locations in 2017, Toys R Us open the two new stores in The Galleria in Houston, Texas, and in the Westfield Garden State Plaza in Paramus, N.J.
The stores will be nearly 6,500 square feet — roughly one third the size of its big-box stores.
The joint partnership plans to open 10 additional stores in “prime, high-traffic retail markets” within the U.S. throughout 2020. Future store locations are planned to be about 10,000 square feet.
They’ll be “the most progressive and advanced stores in its category in the world, and we hope to surprise and delight kids for generations to come,” Vibhu Norby, CEO of b8ta said.
As NPR previously reported, the chain employed more than 30,000 people in the U.S. before the bankruptcy. Tru Kids Brands said it wants to give hiring priority to former employees.
Toys R Us declared bankruptcy after struggling with a heavy load of debt caused by a buyout in 2005, including competition from Amazon, Target and Walmart. The company owed more than $5 million.
Even as it went bankrupt, the original Toys R Us accounted for about a fifth of toy sales in the U.S.
Tru Kids Brands currently operates more than 700 stores outside the U.S.
U.S. Overdose Deaths Dipped In 2018, But Some States Saw ‘Devastating’ Increases

Nationally, drug overdose deaths reached record levels in 2017, when a group protested in New York City on Overdose Awareness Day on August 31. Deaths appear to have declined slightly in 2018, based on provisional numbers, but nearly 68,000 people still died.
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Good news came out from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wednesday: Preliminary data shows reported drug overdoses declined 4.2% in 2018, after rising precipitously for decades.
“It looks like this is the first turnaround since the opioid crisis began,” says Bertha Madras who served on President Trump’s opioid commission, and is a professor of psychobiology at Harvard Medical School.
She says it won’t be entirely clear until the CDC finalizes the numbers but, “I think the tide could be turning.”
But not everyone was celebrating. Some states actually saw double-digit increases.
“It’s deflating,” Rachel Winograd says. She’s an associate research professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. “It’s incredibly discouraging to see the increase in Missouri in 2018 that happened at the same time as we really ramped up so many efforts to save lives and improve lives in our state.”
The provisional data shows Missouri deaths increased by 17% — one of 18 states that saw a year-over-year increase.
Loading…
Don’t see the graphic above? Click here.
Over the last several years, Missouri has received $65 million in federal grants to address the opioid crisis, Winograd says, and she has helped the state decide where and how to spend that money. They’ve focused on expanding access to medication-assisted treatment, and “saturating our communities with naloxone — the opiate overdose antidote,” she says.
“Any scholar who’s been studying this epidemic will tell you that those are effective tools at saving lives. We’ve drastically increased access to those services and we know we’ve saved thousands of lives.
“The fact that the numbers didn’t go down and that people were dying at an even higher rate — it was devastating,” Winograd says.
The numbers out Wednesday are not final, notes Farida Ahmad, mortality surveillance lead of the National Center for Health Statistics at the CDC. She says they should be close to the final numbers, though. For provisional data, “our threshold is for 90% completeness,” she says.
Michael Botticelli, the executive director of the Grayken Center for Addiction at Boston Medical Center and formerly President Obama’s drug czar, says the geographic variation in drug deaths is troubling.
“I think it’s important to pay attention to and really understand what is happening in each of these states, and why are some states seeing dramatic increases versus those seeing dramatic decreases?” he says.
The reasons for this geographic variation are numerous. For one, this data only reflects the difference from one year to the next, so states that had a bad year in 2017, can show an improvement in 2018, even if the overall picture is still grim.
Another variable is fentanyl, the highly potent synthetic opioid that’s been responsible for a rising number of overdoses in recent years. Some states have a lot of fentanyl in their drug supply, and others do not.
“We saw increases all along the Mississippi river, and I would not be surprised if that was due to an increase in the proportion of fentanyl in their drug supply,” Winograd says. Deaths from fentanyl continue to rise, according to Ahmad from the CDC.
Other variations in the drug supply could contribute to the differences from state to state, says Christopher Ruhm, a professor of public policy at the University of Virginia. He notes stimulants have a different geographic spread than fentanyl, and those deaths are also on the rise.
“Some of this may be due to the nature of the drug epidemic in different places, some of it may also be due to how much we are providing medication-assisted treatment, and engaging in other policies to try to address this problem,” Ruhm says.
The social safety net also plays a role, says Winograd. In Missouri, “we just have fewer resources to help people in need,” she says.
“We have a lack of housing, incarceration rates are increasing — these are all connected and making the most vulnerable people in our society at highest risk of overdose deaths.”
Missouri was among five states that showed increased overdose numbers and had not expanded Medicaid, Winograd notes. Medicaid expansion means more people have coverage for addiction treatment, and research shows it’s making a difference.
Ohio was a bright spot on the 2018 map, showing a 22% decrease in 2018, although in raw numbers, it still had 4,000 reported deaths.
“It is still a nightmare. And the danger in media over-portraying this is actually quite substantial,” says Shawn Ryan, an addiction doctor in Ohio and past-president of the Ohio Society of Addiction Medicine. “If we look at just that decrease nationally — which is not that big — we’re missing the point. In order to get back to baseline, we have a very long way to go.”
In the CDC’s preliminary national numbers, 67,744 people are reported to have died from drug overdoses in 2018. Even though that’s several thousand less than died from drug overdoses in 2017, it’s still many, many more people than died of AIDS in the worst years of the crisis.
The decline should not be a signal to slow down efforts — or funding — to combat the epidemic, Ryan says.
He cites the proposed CARE Act, a legislative effort led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Representative Elijah E. Cummings, D-Md., which would allocate $100 billion over 10 years for addiction and recovery services. The CARE Act is modeled on the Ryan White Act, put in place to combat the AIDS epidemic.
“That’s actually much more in line with what’s needed,” says Ryan.
$100 billion would dwarf past federal funds for the epidemic. Grants from the State Targeted Response to the Opioid Crisis program, authorized by the 21st Century Cures Act, totaled $1 billion. In 2019, State Opioid Response federal grants are set to total $1.4 billion.
“If you look at the dollars spent to date, the fact that we’ve had the impact we’ve had is actually because of people being invested and working very hard for not that many dollars,” says Ryan.
Boticelli agrees that the only way to ensure the national trend continues is to adequately fund it. “We can’t look at a 5% reduction and say our work is done. I think it basically shows us that we have to redouble our efforts,” he says. “How are we going to ensure that states have the resources that they need to continue to focus energy on this epidemic?”
In a statement Wednesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar celebrated the decline and indicated that federal funding won’t be going away. “By no means have we declared victory against the epidemic or addiction in general. This crisis developed over two decades and it will not be solved overnight,” Azar wrote.
Rachel Winograd says for her, the increase in deaths in Missouri is an indication that there’s much more to do.
“I am very proud of what Missouri has done. I don’t think we should have done anything differently,” she says. “And I do think that we’ve been even more aggressive than many of the states that saw decreases, in terms of our focus on evidence-based solutions.
“It’s not that we did the wrong thing — it’s that we didn’t do enough of the right thing,” she adds. “And we need more sustainable funding to do that.”
Carmel Wroth contributed reporting to this story.
Frenchman Julian Alaphilippe Leads Tour De France As Race Enters Second Half
NPR’s Ari Shapiro speaks with Damian McCall, a reporter for the Agence France-Presse, about this year’s Tour de France and the Frenchman currently in the lead, Julian Alaphilippe.
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
French people are more riveted than usual to the Tour de France this year. A French cyclist has not won the Tour in 34 years, and this year, there are two grabbing the world’s attention. Damian McCall is a reporter with Agence France-Presse, and he’s been covering the tour.
Welcome to the program.
DAMIAN MCCALL: Hello, everybody.
SHAPIRO: Let’s start with the cyclist who is currently in the lead as the race enters its second half. Who is he? Tell us about him.
MCCALL: This is a guy called Julian Alaphilippe, and he is, in fact – in terms of road racing, cycling, he is the world’s No. 1. And Julian – he’s riding for a Belgian team called Quick-Step, and he’s been wearing something called the yellow jersey, which the overall leader of the Tour de France wears so the public on the roadside can pick out the fast-moving peloton sweeping past them. Alaphilippe is in the lead – his eighth day he’s going to be wearing the yellow jersey.
SHAPIRO: But even though he’s in the lead, he’s not expected to win. Explain that to us.
MCCALL: All right. He’s basically a one-day racer. His team go for one-day races. There are many prizes on offer in the Tour de France. The team that are expected to win it are not trying to win at all stages. They’re trying to get the best overall time. And they have two contenders for that – very different men. One’s the 33-year-old Welshman, the defending champion. The other one’s a 22-year-old Colombian whiz kid, Bernal. He’s currently third. So they’re second and third.
But Alaphilippe seems to be digging deeper every day. He’s a former soldier. And he’s extremely tough, really affable, straight-talking. The things he’s done – they’ve set on fire the passions of the people, really. He’s just sort of gone on a rampage – these break-for-the-border dashes for the finishing line. And he’s succeeded three or four times, and everybody’s talking about him.
SHAPIRO: And then there is another Frenchman who is one of the favorites to win the race. Tell us about him.
MCCALL: That’s right – Thibaut Pinot, very different, a very emotional man. And he fell into a trap a few days ago and lost a bit of time. But he’s still in with a very big shot. So he’s vowed to fight back on Saturday and may well get back into a position. Thibaut Pinot is about 28, 29 years old. He hasn’t raced here for a while. He’d been racing in Italy. He really is a very, very popular man. And if he does win the Tour de France, he will be the most popular man in France.
SHAPIRO: Now, as we’ve said, the race is just past its halfway point, and a Frenchman has not won the Tour de France in 34 years. So what’s the attitude and sentiment like among people in these small French towns where the cyclists are whizzing past?
MCCALL: I had the great opportunity just yesterday, in fact, to cover the 200-kilometer stage on the back of a motorbike. I mean, the roadsides are just packed. It’s a very popular sporting event. There’s no pay. You don’t – it’s not in a stadium. The stadium is the country itself. Today at the finish line – I went down to the finish line when we arrived at the finish town, and there was about 4 kilometers packed four, five deep towards the finishing line three hours before the guys arrived.
SHAPIRO: Wow.
MCCALL: There was drinking and singing and families, grandparents – and the kids are having their school holidays here.
SHAPIRO: Do French people seem particularly attuned to the possibility of a French cyclist possibly winning it?
MCCALL: Well, can I tell you something very French?
SHAPIRO: Of course.
MCCALL: No (laughter).
SHAPIRO: No. They don’t care.
MCCALL: Well, I think they care. They care deeply. They’re just skeptical because they haven’t won it since Bernard Hinault won his fifth in 1985.
SHAPIRO: The French people don’t believe this is actually their year. They’re not allowing themselves to hope.
MCCALL: Well, Julian Alaphilippe is in the yellow jersey. They’re starting to believe that maybe he can take it down to maybe the last three days. But, you know, I’m not sure he can concentrate all the way. They’re not sure he can concentrate. He’s too emotional.
SHAPIRO: Damian McCall is a reporter with Agence France-Presse.
Thank you for joining us.
MCCALL: Thank you very much. Bye-bye.
(SOUNDBITE OF KRAFTWERK’S “TOUR DE FRANCE ETAPE 1”)
Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan’s Voice Offers A Sonic Refuge

Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and his Party, performing live at the WOMAD festival in 1985.
Andrew Catlin/Courtesy of Real World Records
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew Catlin/Courtesy of Real World Records
Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan was hailed as one of the singers of the 20th century. Even now, more than 20 years after his death in 1997, there’s no dearth of opportunities to hear his work, through a combination of sheer popularity, an enormous official discography, and literally thousands of pirated versions. All in all, no one has been suffering for lack for recordings of this Pakistani vocal master of qawwali, a staggeringly beautiful and ecstatic musical form.

Live at WOMAD 1985 comes out July 26 (pre-order).

Stream Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan’s ‘Live At WOMAD 1985’
01Allah Ho Allah Ho
21:00
02Haq Ali Ali
25:05
03Shahbaaz Qalandar
9:03
04Biba Sada Dil Mor De
9:51
And yet, here we are, with a brand-new issue of Khan captured at his vocal prime, recorded when he was just at the precipice of becoming an international phenomenon: a midnight set recorded in 1985 at England’s WOMAD festival, which was co-founded by Peter Gabriel five years earlier to showcase international music and dance talent. It was the performance that was hailed as Khan’s first real introduction to non-South Asian audiences.
It’s a recording that has languished in the archives for 34 years. (There are some low-quality videos of this performance online, but the sound on this album release, carefully digitized and remixed, is excellent.) Whether for longtime fans or new initiates, Live at WOMAD 1985 is an album to be treasured.
A bit of background for newcomers: qawwali — whose root means “utterance” in Arabic — is a uniquely South Asian musical style. These devotional songs are, in places including Pakistan and India, a core part of Sufism — that is, the mystical branch of Islam that emphasizes a personal connection to God, and embraces the qualities of tolerance, peace, and equality as core principles. (Sufi shrines and gatherings have been targeted for violence by Muslim extremists, both in South Asia and elsewhere.) As Sufism spread from Persia and what is now Turkey to northern India some 800 years ago, its poetry and music were blended with local styles.
Considering the electrifying energy that surges through a qawwali performance, the traditional set-up is rather humble. A group of performers, referred to in English as a “party” – and all male – sit cross-legged on a rug-covered stage. The main singer is usually accompanied by one or two harmoniums to provide melodic support as well as percussion (normally, the tabla and dholak drums), while a small chorus sings and provides heartbeat-like claps.
This 1985 concert marks Khan at his most traditional. It starts out with one of Khan’s signature songs: “Allah Ho” [God Is], which is also known on other recordings as “Allah Hu” or “Allah Hoo.” It’s a hamd, or praise song, and the traditional way of opening a qawwali performance. The audience was slowly drawn in, first through the plush harmonium, beautifully played by Khan’s brother, Farrukh Fateh Ali Khan, and the constant murmur of tabla and the hand claps of the group’s chorus. Those listeners couldn’t have been prepared for what was about to erupt.
Khan — who is often reverently called by the honorific Khan Sahib — was literally born into this style: his family had been qawwals for over 600 years. He learned the family business from his father and uncles — though his father, who was primarily a Hindustani (North Indian) classical singer, dreamed that his son would become a doctor.
His first public performance came at his father’s funeral, when he was just 16 years old. There was a strong adherence to classical music in his family tradition, which you can hear in Khan’s own performances. Without question, he was on fire when he sang — lovers of soul and gospel will find much common ground here. But he was also an exemplary improviser in the Hindustani classical style, using solfege-like swara syllables to race up and down the span of his range, darting between intervals large and small, and always with an ear to the technical and emotional demands of a particular raga.
At WOMAD in 1985, Khan led his neophyte listeners through a very typical qawwali performance arc: after praising God in “Allah Ho,” the group moved to “Haq Ali,” [Ali is Truth], a song devoted to the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law (and a figure revered by Sufis of both the Sunni and Shi’a sects); “Shabaaz Qalandar,” which honors a 13th century, Afghanistan-born Sufi master; and a more contemporary love song, “Biba Sada Dil Mor De,” which opens with the line “If you can’t remain in front of my eyes, please give me back my heart.” (This style of song, called a ghazal, can be understood as a secular love song or, more mystically, as a devotee’s love of the divine.)
In all, it was a very truncated performance — in more traditional settings, qawwali concerts can go all night — but it was enough to hook listeners in.
In a qawwali performance, the main singer is usually accompanied by one or two harmoniums to provide melodic support as well as percussion, while a small chorus sings and provides heartbeat-like claps.
Jak Kilby/Courtesy of Real World Records
hide caption
toggle caption
Jak Kilby/Courtesy of Real World Records
It’s hard to overstate what a milestone this festival was for Khan. Not long after he gave this performance at WOMAD, the Pakistani artist went on to release a string of studio albums for Peter Gabriel’s tastemaking record label, Real World. (Months after his WOMAD date, he made an excellent series of live recordings in Paris for the French label Ocora, as the late anthropologist and ethnomusicologist Adam Nayyar, a friend of Khan, detailed in a lovely remembrance that he wrote after the singer’s death; around the same time, Khan also made a string of sublime live albums in London, released by the Navras label.)
Live at WOMAD 1985 offers something else, too. It’s a 30-plus-year-old album, which means that — at least for the album’s duration – it offers a sonic refuge from the world we all presently inhabit, one that’s shadowed by decades of fear, suspicion, growing nationalism and acrimony. Not only was it made many years before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — right after which some Pakistani immigrants to the U.S. were either deported by the government, or left the country ostensibly of their own accord — but also decades before Pakistanis in the U.S. worried about ICE raids, and a generation before racist rhetoric and heated anti-Muslim comments were part of the daily political salvos fired in the United States. Given what’s elapsed in the past three decades, it’s hard to envision a traditional, firmly Muslim artist reaching the same apex of visibility, or even popularity, in places like the U.S. or the U.K. had he emerged not in 1985, but in 2015.
In retrospect, it’s astonishing to think how beloved Khan became in such short measure. His presence in front of non-South Asian audiences lasted barely a dozen years — yet he counted among his fans Jeff Buckley, Madonna, Mick Jagger, Red Hot Chili Peppers, and Eddie Vedder, with whom he recorded. Even so, pressure points around faith, identity and allegiances grew for Khan during his lifetime, and at home. He lamented the state of music, and by extension, the encroaching iron hand of a puritanical form of Islam, in his home country — a sort of fundamentalism that, if it had existed centuries earlier in South Asia, would have precluded qawwali from ever having developed in the first place.
“In Pakistan, people have an indifferent attitude towards music. There are no institutions to teach music and singing,” he told Pakistan’s Herald magazine in 1991. “[Our] people are morally confused about music. Those who want to learn or have learned are always confused and feel guilt. But to tell you the truth, classical music … is not against Islam. It is not haram [forbidden by Islamic principles].”
While his faith was rock-solid, Khan was catholic in his musical tastes; along with eventually making an array of crossover projects with European, British and North American artists, he wrote the music for and appeared in several Bollywood films, on screen or as a playback singer — the rawness smoothed out into honeyed drips of sound.
But Live at WOMAD 1985 offers pure soul — each run up and down the scale a jolt of adrenaline, each beat of the tabla drum and each handclap making the heart pound faster and louder. And this, truly, is the highest purpose of Sufi music: to bring performers and listeners alike into a state of ecstatic union with the divine. In 1993, after a concert that drew 14,000 people to New York’s Central Park, he told Time magazine: “My music is a bridge between people and God.”
Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan struggled with his health for a long time, but when the end came, it came quickly. In August 1997, at just 48, he traveled from Pakistan to London for medical treatment; he was rushed straight from the airport to a hospital, where he died of a heart attack. In the 21 years since his death, a raft of younger male relatives have tried to carry Khan’s mantle, as performers of either buoyant qawwali, gauzy love songs, or treacly film tunes. But none of them have sparked the devotion of an international audience the way that Nusrat did. The Shahen-Shah, king of kings, qawwali’s brightest shining star, retains his crown.