June 29, 2019

No Image

Troll Watch: In Rare Move, Reddit Flags Online Forum For Inciting Violence

Reddit quarantined a group this week after users incited violence. Volunteer Reddit moderator Robert Peck tells NPR’s Michel Martin that this is a big deal for the infamously hands-off platform.



MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Visitors to the social media site Reddit might have noticed a change in one discussion group this week. The online forum known as The Donald is under a quarantine. That means that anybody going to that page first encounters a big notification flagging the community as out of line with Reddit’s content policy – specifically, the rule against using the platform to incite violence. The group’s 754,000 subscribers can still access the forum, but only after clicking through the quarantine notice.

And that might not sound like much, but Reddit is famously hands-off when it comes to creating and enforcing content rules, and the site relies heavily on volunteers to monitor forums and take down problematic content. So we’re taking this to our regular segment, Troll Watch, to find out more.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

MARTIN: By day, Robert Peck is a lecturer in rhetoric at the University of Iowa. But in his spare time, he’s a volunteer moderator for Reddit. And he joins us now from member station WSUI in Iowa City.

Thanks so much for joining us.

ROBERT PECK: Thank you for having me.

MARTIN: And I said spare time in air quotes because…

PECK: (Laughter).

MARTIN: You put a lot of time into this. I just wanted to make that clear.

PECK: It’s true.

MARTIN: So to understand the significance of this quarantine, can you give us a brief idea of what Reddit is and how it’s different from other social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter?

PECK: The main difference between a site like Reddit, which I would describe as a forum more than a traditional sort of social media site like Twitter or Facebook, is that Reddit’s ideas are organized around subjects and topics as opposed to on Facebook or Twitter, where you’re following an individual person – a friend, a celebrity. And that means that when Reddit wants to take action against harmful content, it’s harder for it to do it against any one individual person.

Among other things, Reddit users are pseudonymous. They don’t usually act under their real names. And they all collect around these social spaces called subreddits that are designed to talk about specific issues or groups.

MARTIN: The Donald is a – it’s a reference to Donald Trump. I mean, is it a political group? Is it primarily for his supporters? Or what’s the organizing principle of this group?

PECK: It describes itself as, quote, unquote, “a never-ending rally for the 45th president of the United States, Donald Trump.” And it’s a group for his supporters specifically. It formed around the time he announced his campaign back in 2015 into 2016 and has been growing ever since.

MARTIN: So what was the content posted in The Donald that led to this action?

PECK: Well, it’s hard to say, I suppose would be the answer to that, because the Reddit staff are opaque a lot of the time and what actions they take and why. The best guess we have is that a few days ago, there were several posts and comments on that subreddit that were – seemed to be calling for violent action against public officials in the U.S. state of Oregon – this in response to the Republican walkout over House Bill 2020 in that state, the Climate Change Act, that has caused the Republican delegation to flee the state rather than vote. There were posts – calling for things like taking up arms, flooding into the state of Oregon, defending these people with violence and going after public officials with violence.

MARTIN: I think many people will be familiar with Reddit because they’re interested in, you know, cat videos and things of that sort. But other people are aware that Reddit has come up a lot in the conversation around the spread of white supremacy and other extremist ideas. I mean, why is that?

PECK: I think that Reddit would have trouble dealing with these issues more than other social media sites would because of that focus on designing the site to center it around an idea or a group of people rather than an individual. That’s a change that allows people with common interests to come together and discuss, advocate and act on those interests more easily than they might be able to in other places. And, again, on Reddit, they can also often do so anonymously.

That combined with Reddit’s seeming dedication to what it would describe as free speech or free expression, its hesitance to limit things that are being said on the site – at least, from the perspective of the staff, the owners of the site – those two things together have allowed all manner of different sort of groups that you and I would probably describe as hate groups or at the very least problematic groups and discussions to arise on that side. And the Donald subreddit has become the most prominent of those.

So I’d say that the reason that we have that sort of association is that oftentimes, it’s true. It’s certainly not the entirety of the sites, just like these extreme views on other social media platforms aren’t the entirety of those sites that we use and enjoy.

MARTIN: That’s Robert Peck, volunteer Reddit moderator. And he’s a professor of rhetoric at the University of Iowa.

Professor Peck, thanks so much for talking to us once again.

PECK: Thank you very much for having me.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Democrats Try To Distinguish Themselves On Health Care

NPR’s Sarah McCammon speaks with Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News about the Democratic presidential candidates’ health care policies.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

Twenty of 24 presidential candidates got the chance to distinguish themselves this week during the first televised Democratic debates, hosted by NBC News. One subject that led to a spirited discussion – health care.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BERNIE SANDERS: We will have “Medicare for All.”

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND: I believe we need to get to universal health care as a right and not a privilege to single payer.

JOE BIDEN: You cannot let people who are sick, no matter where they come from, no matter what their status, go uncovered. You can’t do that.

MCCAMMON: That’s former Vice President Joe Biden and Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Bernie Sanders. Here to help us understand where the Democratic candidates agree and where they don’t is Julie Rovner, chief Washington correspondent for Kaiser Health News. Welcome.

JULIE ROVNER: Hi, Sarah.

MCCAMMON: So there seems to be consensus about some version at least of this idea of Medicare for All, but not everyone’s on the same page about what that phrase actually means. Julie, what does Medicare for All mean?

ROVNER: Well, it can mean a lot of things. That’s part of what’s so confusing about this debate. First of all, what Medicare are they talking about? Are they talking about the current Medicare that most people over age 65 have? That’s not really the case in a lot of these plans. They’re mostly talking about a new program that would have much broader, more comprehensive benefits. It wouldn’t require people to have copays or deductibles. Then the question is, what do they mean by all? Do they mean that everybody would go into this new Medicare program? Would they be required to give up private insurance they might have now, or would that be voluntary?

MCCAMMON: And why is that distinction important, whether it’s voluntary or something that people are just automatically in by virtue of being an American?

ROVNER: Well, we certainly learned during the implementation of the Affordable Care Act that the very few people who were basically required to give up their insurance were extremely unhappy about that. People may not like the private insurance that they have, but they’re terrified about going to something new that they fear might be worse.

MCCAMMON: And one telling moment in the debate was when candidates were asked to raise their hands if they would support coverage under a government plan for undocumented immigrants. And all of them did raise their hands on the second night of the debate. Here’s South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg explaining his position.

(SOUNDBTE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PETE BUTTIGIEG: Our country is healthier when everybody is healthier. And remember; we’re talking about something people are given a chance to buy into.

MCCAMMON: Julie, were you surprised to see all the Democrats take that position, that they would cover undocumented immigrants in a government plan?

ROVNER: I was surprised. This was something that was a big issue during the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010. Undocumented immigrants were not allowed to sign up for expanded Medicaid or get subsidies on the insurance exchanges. It was a very sensitive issue. And I think Democrats were not very happy about that. But they felt that they literally could not get the bill passed if they were to allow undocumented people to take advantage of some of the benefits. And that seems to have really come around just in the last 10 years.

MCCAMMON: And President Trump tweeted during the debate, quote, “all Democrats just raised their hands for giving millions of illegal aliens unlimited health care. How about taking care of American citizens first? That’s the end of that race.” I mean, how might this issue play with general election voters?

ROVNER: Well, obviously, immigration is going to be almost as big an issue as health care, I suspect, going into 2020. And I think Democrats are sort of staking themselves out on the supportive of immigration side if only to contrast themselves with what’s going on at the southern border and President Trump. I have no idea how it’s going to play out, but it certainly seems like they’re not being shy about which side they’re on.

MCCAMMON: Another polarizing issue – we’ve heard candidates affirm support for abortion rights opposing the Hyde Amendment, for example, which bans federal funding for most abortions. Several Democratic candidates expressed support for covering abortion under Medicare or another government plan. Senator Elizabeth Warren, for example, when asked if she supports any limits on abortion didn’t directly answer that but pivoted to expressing support for reproductive rights in general. Julie, what is the rhetoric we’re hearing, say, about where the Democratic Party is on this issue right now?

ROVNER: Well, this has been a gradual but noticeable move to the left for the Democrats. There used to be a significant percentage of the party that were Democrats but didn’t support abortion. And Democrats had long been sort of careful about that flank of the party. There seemed to be fewer of them. It seems that both parties are moving sort of to the polls on this issue, Democrats being very supportive of abortion rights, Republicans being very unsupportive of abortion rights. And it makes me wonder what’s going to happen to those people in the middle because even though they’re not very well represented by the parties anymore, if you look at public opinion polls, there are a lot of people in that sort of middle group. And right now, it seems that neither party is really speaking to them.

MCCAMMON: You know, sort of a reality check here, Julie, if one of these Democrats wins in 2020, what can they actually do on this issue?

ROVNER: Well, obviously, it would take Congress to do a lot of things that some of these candidates are talking about, but it’s important to remember that the president alone has a lot of power through making federal rules. The Trump administration is very much rolling back access to abortion and birth control through its rulemaking authority. A Democratic president could reverse all of those things.

MCCAMMON: Well, that was Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News. Thanks, Julie.

ROVNER: Thank you.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Boston’s Suffolk Downs Holds Its Last Live Horse Races

Boston’s Suffolk Downs racetrack, once a hugely popular venue for a nationally beloved sport, is marking the end of an era as it hosts its last live horse race ever.



SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

It’s the end of an era for East Boston’s historic Suffolk Downs racetrack. Live horse racing, which began there in 1935, will end after one final race day tomorrow. Tori Bedford from member station WGBH brings us this from the track.

(SOUNDBITE OF BUGLE HORN)

TORI BEDFORD, BYLINE: It’s the second race of the day and hometown jockey Tammi Piermarini is soaring through the muddy track on Atta Kid, a horse that, unlike her, is just starting his career.

UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Come on, Tammi.

BEDFORD: Piermarini and Atta Kid fly through the finish line to win the race.

TAMMI PIERMARINI: You can walk right in the girl’s room. Just shut the door behind you.

BEDFORD: Piermarini is small and sturdy. She hops off her horse and meets me in the locker room where we talk while she wipes mud from the track off of her face.

PIERMARINI: 1985, I rode my first horse here.

BEDFORD: Piermarini is a local kid. She grew up in Newburyport and started riding at 3 years old. She came to Suffolk Downs at the age of 18 and went on to be the third leading female jockey in the country. It’s also where she rode her parents’ first racehorse.

PIERMARINI: That was probably one of the most exciting moments of my life to have them come into the winner’s circle and it’s their horse and their colors I’m wearing. I can’t express or explain how I felt.

BEDFORD: Jockeys like Piermarini have hitched their careers to a sport with waning interest around the country as casinos and online gambling grow in popularity in live horse racing spots, like Suffolk Downs, get transformed into apartments and retail buildings. With the retirement of the tracks, Piermarini says more jockeys and horses are retiring, too.

PIERMARINI: As long as people will ride me, I’m going to continue. But if I’m forced to retire because of no business – and that’s a sad way to go. It’s not that I want to retire. I’m being forced to retire.

BEDFORD: Just outside, a lot of longtime fans here say they aren’t quite ready to say goodbye. Jimmy Haephy grew up in nearby Revere and has been coming to the track for 40 years.

JIMMY HAEPHY: A lot of memories here, you know? A lot of good ones. I know every inch of this place. It’s like walking in my front door walking in here. And I don’t understand why they were closing it. Some reason they want to close, make a shopping mall. I don’t know.

BEDFORD: As a kid nearly 70 years ago, Conrad Smith, or Smitty, was obsessed with two things – baseball and horse racing, coming every weekend with his parents.

CONRAD SMITH: I’ve been doing this all my life, and I’m still coming here. I don’t know what’s going to happen after next year.

BEDFORD: Suffolk Downs used to bring in tens of thousands of spectators with races every day. Now CEO Chip Tuttle says the entire sport is struggling.

CHIP TUTTLE: We fought really hard for a long time to try to preserve racing here at the property, and it didn’t work out, so now it’s on to what’s next.

BEDFORD: Suffolk Downs has closed before and reopened, but Tuttle says this time it’s for real.

TUTTLE: There have been times in the past where we thought racing was going to end, it was over. And we were able to find ways to continue. But I can’t see a way for us to continue racing here.

TD THORNTON: We’ve got Rocket Road in those bright orange silks. He’s covered up on the…

BEDFORD: TD Thornton sits up on the roof in an announcer’s booth speaking into a decades-old microphone to let the crowd know which horses are racing next and pressing a bugle horn to bring those horses out onto the track. He says he doesn’t want the final race to feel like a funeral.

THORNTON: And we’ve had a pretty damn good run here for 84 years so that’s how I’m going to try and focus it and end it on a high note. This is reality, and my role in it is to give the track a respectful sendoff.

BEDFORD: What’s next for you?

THORNTON: Pressing his bugle right here and getting the horse out onto the track.

(SOUNDBITE OF BUGLE HORN)

THORNTON: Horses are heading out for today’s fourth race with the Exacta, Trifecta and Superfecta betting.

BEDFORD: For NPR News, I’m Tori Bedford in Boston.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)