June 28, 2019

No Image

U.S. Women Defeat France In Hard-Fought Quarterfinal Victory

In one of the most highly-anticipated games at the Women’s World Cup: top-ranked and defending champion United States defeated France in the quarterfinals.



AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

The U.S. soccer team showed yet again why it’s the best team at the Women’s World Cup in a hard-fought quarterfinal victory over host France. For the Americans and their fans, it was a thrilling win that lived up to the hype of the pregame buildup. And with today’s 2-1 victory, the U.S. moves on, and the French team is done. Among those in Paris watching the game in the stadium was NPR’s Melissa Block. She joins us now. Hey there, Melissa.

MELISSA BLOCK, BYLINE: Hey, Audie.

CORNISH: Holy smokes, this was a good game. What was it like to be in the stadium?

BLOCK: It was amazing. There were about 46,000 people, a sellout crowd. You know, the U.S. flag – a lot of red, white blue – but the French flag blue, white and red. So the whole stadium was just a scene of the exact same colors in different configurations. And, man, the French were loud until the U.S. scored early in the game, Megan Rapinoe on a free kick that went right into the net. And the energy from the French side just kind of got sucked out of the room, out of the stadium.

And then when she scored again later on, boy, they were defeated. They got a second wind late in the game with their defender Wendie Renard on a header. But final score – 2-1 U.S. France is out, and their team was unconsolable – inconsolable on the field after the game, in tears. I mean, look. They’re the host country. And this was a marquee lineup. And for them to lose this early is really, really a shame. They’re an excellent team.

CORNISH: You described this as a marquee lineup. And I know there were many who felt like this game actually should have been the final, not the quarterfinal. Why?

BLOCK: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, this is – chalk this up to FIFA’s way of determining the seeding and the brackets. And for these two top teams – I mean, the U.S. first seed, France number four – to be playing this early in the quarterfinals and for France to be done is just really a tragedy. I mean, there’s no reason these two teams shouldn’t be playing in the semis or the final. As it is now, the U.S. goes on to play England in the semi. And we’re still waiting for results in the next couple of days – and actually tomorrow – of Italy and the Netherlands and then Sweden and Germany.

CORNISH: Stepping back for a moment, there were questions about the U.S. team after this somewhat shaky performance against Spain in the last game. Does this performance put that to rest?

BLOCK: Yeah. I mean, it’s interesting. There was a lot of second-guessing of coach Jill Ellis and her lineup that she had in the last game and some pretty shaky defense work, front line that was just not getting on the attack as they should have been. It was the exact same lineup in this game, and they performed so much better – the same second-guessing going in. I mean, people were really concerned that she hadn’t changed tactics, but it paid off. And Megan Rapinoe – again, two goals in this game, two goals in the last game. She is the player of the game. And she’s just outstanding to watch, just a phenomenal performance in both of these last two games.

CORNISH: So France was obviously a tough competitor, but now the U.S. is going to face third-ranked England in a match on Tuesday in the semifinals. So this tournament is not going to get any easier.

BLOCK: No, and England looked super strong the other day when they were playing against Norway. They’re a really powerful team. And the other four teams still to play in the quarterfinals are all, you know, top ranked. I mean, this is no cakewalk for the U.S. And look. The U.S. has made it into the semifinals in the last seven World Cups. So if they had gone down today, it would have been historic – didn’t happen. But, boy – a tough fight from Spain the other day and from France today.

CORNISH: One more thing. There’s been a lot of conversation about the pay inequity, especially for the U.S. women’s soccer team. Can you talk about just how big the Women’s World Cup is this year?

BLOCK: Yeah. I mean, it’s fascinating to see Audie, because, there is this fight going on back home. The U.S. women are suing U.S. Soccer for gender discrimination. And you look at this tournament, and – record TV audiences across Europe – in Italy, in England, in France – and big crowds, at least here in Paris. There are going to be sellout crowds in Lyon for the semifinal and final.

And you have to ask. I mean, for countries that have not invested in women’s soccer – and there are many of them – they have to be looking at this and seeing not just a great game but a really powerful audience that they could be tapping into. And if they’re not, they’re crazy.

CORNISH: That’s NPR’s Melissa Block in Paris. Melissa, thanks so much.

BLOCK: You bet.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What Selling Homes Online Says About Changes In The Global Economy

Tech companies are getting into the house-flipping business, buying up billions of dollars in homes from ordinary Americans. The companies are being funded in part by global investors.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

In some parts of the country, people who want to sell their home have a new option. They can go online, type up a few details about their house and sell their home to a big company for cash. Jacob Goldstein from our Planet Money podcast explains why this is happening and what it reveals about changes in the global economy.

JACOB GOLDSTEIN, BYLINE: In the past few years, several big companies have jumped into the business of paying cash for houses. There’s Zillow, which is known for online housing listings. There is a startup called Opendoor that bought around 10,000 houses last year. Also Redfin, this big, sort of hybrid tech company real estate brokerage. Glenn Kelman is Redfin’s CEO, and he told me about the first time an executive at his company suggested that Redfin get into the business of buying houses.

GLENN KELMAN: And then you know what I said? I’m too chicken. I won’t do it.

GOLDSTEIN: Of course, he’s chicken. He would have to put hundreds of millions of dollars on the line betting that Redfin could buy houses, turnaround and quickly sell them for a small profit. This is legitimately terrifying. But Kelman told me that legitimate terror notwithstanding, there were these three big changes that finally persuaded him and a bunch of other companies to get into this business.

KELMAN: The first is that people who sell houses through Redfin are having a time getting the money fast enough to buy their next place.

GOLDSTEIN: In other words, you’re selling your house. You want to buy a new house. But since the financial crisis, it’s been a lot harder to get a mortgage for the new house before you’ve sold your old house. So there is this new group of people who can afford to make a move, but they just can’t make the financing work. That is change No. 1. Change No. 2 is technological. Companies like Redfin started building these algorithms that are really good at estimating home prices. And then change No. 3 is about finance. Investors all around the world started throwing gobs of money at tech companies. It was so much money, in fact, and it seemed so easy to get that it even surprised Glenn Kelman, who is the CEO of a tech company.

KELMAN: Redfin got a call from somebody representing Saudi Arabian money or Kuwaiti money. And then he said, I’ve got a problem. I have all this money, and I need to deploy it. And he just wanted to give it to us. And that’s when I felt like something really deep and fundamental was changing in the global economy.

GOLDSTEIN: So tech companies that have built algorithms to estimate home prices are now flush with money and can use that money to start buying houses from home sellers who need money. The companies are mostly buying moderately priced homes in subdivisions with lots of identical houses. So if you live in a house like that, you can go online, enter some details about your house and in a few hours or a day get a cash offer from Redfin or one of its competitors who then have an inspector confirm that the house is in decent shape. It’s fast and easy, but there is a trade-off. You probably will wind up getting a few percent less than if you sold your house with a traditional real estate agent. Kelman says he can imagine that something like 10% of people might someday sell their homes this way, and that is enough to be a little bit scary.

KELMAN: I think it’s a new thing in the economy. And if I had to pick people to make prudent bets at the casino tables, tech people wouldn’t be that. And so that’s where I remind myself.

GOLDSTEIN: Would not – you’re saying would not.

KELMAN: Would not.

GOLDSTEIN: Yeah.

KELMAN: And I just remind myself every night. If you look at the history of subprime, you see people making a ton of money in that space and other players getting drawn into it one by one. And it proved to be their demise because, you know, you chase profits, you follow the customer over a cliff and, you know, we’re trying to be the ones who beat those odds.

GOLDSTEIN: Jacob Goldstein, NPR News.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Tennessee Hospital Sues Its Own Employees When They Can’t Pay Their Medical Bills

The Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare system in Memphis, which includes Methodist University Hospital, has sued thousands of patients, including many of its own low-wage employees.

Andrea Morales for MLK50


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrea Morales for MLK50

This article was produced in partnership with nonprofit news organization MLK50, which is a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network.

This year, a hospital housekeeper left her job just three hours into her shift and caught a bus to Shelby County General Sessions Court in Memphis, Tenn.

Wearing her black and gray uniform, she had a different kind of appointment with her employer, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare: The hospital was suing her for unpaid medical bills.

In 2017, the nonprofit hospital system based in Memphis sued the woman for the cost of hospital stays to treat chronic abdominal pain she experienced before the hospital hired her.

She now owes Methodist more than $23,000, including around $5,800 in attorney’s fees.

It’s surreal, she says, to be sued by the organization that pays her $12.25 an hour. “You know how much you pay me. And the money you’re paying, I can’t live on,” says the housekeeper, who asked that her name not be used for fear that the hospital would fire her for talking to a reporter.

From 2014 through 2018, the hospital system, which is affiliated with the United Methodist Church, has filed more than 8,300 lawsuits against patients, including some of its own workers. After winning judgments, it has sought to garnish the wages of more than 160 Methodist workers and has actually done so in more than 70 instances over that time, according to an MLK50-ProPublica analysis of Shelby County General Sessions Court records, online docket reports and case files.

Some of the debts were accrued while the employees worked at Methodist; others predated their time there. The figures do not include debts incurred by onetime Methodist employees who have since moved on.

It’s not uncommon for hospitals to sue patients over unpaid debts. In fact, as NPR reported Tuesday, recent research shows that more than a third of hospitals in Virginia do so. And earlier reporting from NPR and ProPublica found the practice in several other states.

But what is striking at Methodist, the largest hospital system in the Memphis region, is how many of the patients being sued are the hospital’s own employees. Hardly a week goes by in which Methodist workers aren’t on the court docket fighting debt lawsuits filed by their employer.

Between January and mid-June, a reporter observed more than a dozen Methodist employees in court to defend themselves in suits brought by the hospital over hospital bills.

That includes a Methodist Le Bonheur employee who owes more than $1,200. In January, she proposed paying $100 a month, even though her sworn affidavit listed monthly expenses that exceeded her $1,650 monthly income. After conferring with an attorney for Methodist, Judge Betty Thomas Moore agreed to the worker’s proposal, but she has already missed a payment.

A few weeks later, a Methodist employee appeared for an initial hearing wearing hospital scrubs. The hospital had sued her for more than $4,000. When she left the courtroom, she was annoyed. Her employer knew where she worked, she said, and should have contacted her before suing her.

“I don’t know why they can’t come upstairs,” she said outside the courtroom.

And in May, an employee who has worked for Methodist for more than four years carried a large envelope full of bills with her into the courtroom. She owed more than $5,400, which included a 2017 hospital charge from the newborn unit. That is the same year that her daughter was born, according to her sworn affidavit, which also listed a checking account balance of less than $4.

The woman offered to pay $10 biweekly, or $20 most months, but Methodist’s attorney wanted $200 per month. The judge ordered her to pay $100 per month.

What makes matters worse, employees say, is that Methodist’s health insurance benefits only allow employees to seek medical care at Methodist facilities, even though the financial assistance policies at its competitors are more generous.

A specialist in hospital billing practices says that if the hospital is suing a fair number of its own employees, it’s time to examine both the insurance provided to workers and the pay scale.

Given that the hospital is suing some of its own employees, “one would hope … the hospital would look at the insurance they provide workers,” says Mark Rukavina, a former nonprofit hospital consultant and currently a manager at Community Catalyst, a health care advocacy organization.

Methodist declined requests for an interview. It did not respond to specific written questions about the lawsuits it files against its workers or about how its policies reflect the values of the United Methodist Church. Instead, in a written statement, it said it is committed to working with patients who are having trouble paying their medical bills.

“As the second largest private employer in Shelby County, we recognize the responsibility we have as an organization to contribute to the success of the diverse communities we serve and are purposeful about creating jobs in our community — intentionally choosing to keep services like printing, laundry and others in-house that are typically outsourced by the health care industry,” the hospital said.

Methodist also declined to answer a question about whether it has any policy that prohibits employees being sued by Methodist from talking to a reporter about the lawsuits filed against them by the hospital.

Employer and legal adversary

Between January and mid-June of this year, a reporter observed more than a dozen Methodist employees in court to defend themselves in lawsuits brought by the hospital over hospital bills.

Andrea Morales for MLK50


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrea Morales for MLK50

On a single January day, there were 10 defendants on the docket whose place of employment was listed in court records as Methodist.

Employees in scrubs sat just feet away from the attorneys in dress suits — attorneys their employer had hired to sue them. The hospital’s role as a tax-exempt organization that both employs the defendants and is suing them went unremarked upon by judges, attorneys and the defendants themselves.

Methodist’s financial assistance policy stands out from peers in Memphis and across the country, MLK50 and ProPublica found. The policy offers no assistance for patients with any form of health insurance, no matter their out-of-pocket costs. Under Methodist’s insurance plan, employees are responsible for a $750 individual deductible and then 20% of inpatient and outpatient costs, up to a maximum out-of-pocket cost of $4,100 per year.

The housekeeper’s story is documented in Shelby County General Sessions Court records, including online docket reports and online payment history. A reporter interviewed the housekeeper multiple times in person and on the phone. The employee gave the reporter six years of itemized Methodist hospital bills, her credit report and other past-due medical bills. Most of her debts were incurred before she started working at Methodist.

Five times between 2012 and 2014, she visited the hospital for stomach problems, according to the itemized bills. (Years later, she had surgery to treat diverticulitis.) At those times, she had insurance through her job at a hotel, where she cleaned rooms for $10.66 an hour. After insurance paid its share, she owed just over $17,500.

In 2015, the housekeeper left the hotel job and lost her insurance. Three times that year she went to Methodist’s ER, but since she was uninsured and had little income, she qualified for financial assistance. Methodist wrote off more than $45,000 in hospital bills.

In a statement, Methodist said it gives an automatic 70% discount to uninsured patients and free care to uninsured patients at or below 125% of the federal poverty guidelines. For a single adult with two dependents, that would be just over $26,600. Uninsured patients who earn more than that, but less than twice the poverty limit, are also eligible for discounts, it said.

In 2016, unable to find work, the housekeeper left Memphis. For more than a year, she says, she and her son were homeless, bouncing between relatives in Chicago, where she was born, and Texas.

But she missed her daughter and grandchildren in Memphis. So in 2017, she returned. In August 2017, Methodist sued her for the bills she accumulated when she was insured years earlier. Later that month, she was hired at a Methodist hospital, starting at $11.95 an hour.

The hospital’s collections agency, which it owns, didn’t have her correct address and was unable to serve notice that she had been sued, but last year, Methodist tried again. This time, it had the right address.

In November, a process server handed her the civil warrant at her South Memphis apartment.

At the process server’s recommendation, she called the hospital’s collection agency and offered to pay $50 every two weeks. “But they said it wasn’t enough,” she recalls. “I would just have to go to court. They said I’d be owing them all my life.”

In a sworn affidavit filed with the court this year, the housekeeper listed her dependents as a grandson and her 27-year-old son, who she says has bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. She told the court she earned $16,000 in 2017, which puts her more than $4,000 below that year’s federal poverty level for a family of three. (Because she had insurance, though, she was ineligible for assistance under the hospital’s policy.)

Fred Morton, a retired Methodist minister in Memphis, says he was surprised to learn that Methodist is suing its own employees.

“The employees should be paid an adequate minimum wage at the very least,” he says. “Certainly they should not be predatory to their own employees on medical bills. That’s very much contrary to Scripture.”

He said that Methodist bishops who serve on its board bear responsibility for reminding it of the denomination’s values.

An employee at a Methodist University Hospital is being sued by her employer for unpaid medical bills incurred before they hired her.

Andrea Morales for MLK50


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrea Morales for MLK50

“It’s a matter of the church pushing on its own,” Morton says.

Three United Methodist Church bishops serve on the hospital’s board. Bishop Gary Mueller’s office referred a reporter to Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare’s communications office. Bishop Bill McAilly declined to comment. Bishop James E. Swanson did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

When the housekeeper appeared before a General Sessions Court judge this year, she’d filed a motion offering to pay $50 biweekly, or $100 in most months. When the hospital’s attorney asked for a $200 per month, she was stunned.

“This is my only job, this is my only income, so how am I supposed to live?” she remembered thinking.

Nervous that the judge would side with the hospital, the housekeeper made another offer.

“I could do $75 every two weeks,” she said quickly.

The attorney agreed and the judge signed the order.

Being an employee and defendant is “really kind of sad,” the housekeeper says. Asked how she manages to make ends meet, she says she doesn’t: “It’s killing me — killing me softly.”

She says she didn’t reach out to the hospital’s payroll department or a manager about the hospital bills she’s being sued for. “They don’t care about that. … That I do know.”

‘I don’t want to be homeless again’

Part of what makes paying medical bills so hard for some Methodist employees is that their wages are low, lagging behind several other large employers in the Memphis market. In December, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital announced it was raising its minimum pay for full and part-time workers to $15 an hour. St. Jude’s decision followed a similar commitment by the Shelby County government, Shelby County Schools and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee.

At Methodist, which operates five hospitals in Shelby County, the lowest-paid employees make $10 an hour and about 18% of workers make less than $15 an hour, the hospital reported in response to MLK50’s 2018 Living Wage Survey.

As recently as 2017, the Greater Memphis Chamber advertised on its website that the city offered a workforce at “wage rates that are lower than most other parts of the country.”

The United Methodist Church’s Social Principles, which state the denomination’s position on everything from climate change to the death penalty, speak directly to what employees should earn. “Every person has the right to a job at a living wage,” it states. The Living Wage Model statement on the church’s website says, “Exploitation or underpayment of workers is incompatible with Christ’s commandment to love our neighbor.”

Methodist, which made Forbes’ 2019 list of Best Employers by State, did not answer specific questions about pay for employees. On its website, it says, “It is the policy of Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare to pay its employees competitive, market-based wages.”

Neither Methodist, nonprofit Baptist Memorial Healthcare nor Regional One, the public hospital, pay all their employees at least $15 an hour. Even that figure would make it impossible to make ends meet for an employee trying alone to support a household with dependents, according to MIT’s Living Wage Calculator and another created by the Economic Policy Institute, both of which take into account local living expenses.

The housekeeper’s $12.25 an hour pay falls well short of that. Without overtime, she says, her take-home pay would be around $1,600 per month. Her rent is $610.

Even with as much overtime as she gets, she’s turned to payday loans. Since December, she’s renewed a $425 payday loan every two weeks, paying $71 each time. “You have to rob from Paul to pay Peter,” she says. “It doesn’t never seem like you can get ahead.”

The housekeeper applied for a job at Walmart but was told the store nearest her is not accepting applications. She doubts the pay will be any better, but she hopes it will be less stressful.

“Times be hard, because sometimes my body feels like I can’t make it,” she says. “But I get up anyway, because I don’t want to be homeless again.”

Wendi C. Thomas is the editor of MLK50: Justice Through Journalism. Email her at wendicthomas@mlk50.com and find her on Twitter at @wendi_c_thomas.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)