June 5, 2019

No Image

Ohio To Juárez And Back Again: Why Tariffs On Mexico Alarm The Auto Industry

An employee works at a wiring harness and cable assembly manufacturing company in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, that exports to the U.S. in 2017. The auto industry says threatened tariffs would play havoc with supply chains.

Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters

President Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on goods imported from Mexico, starting next week, if Mexico doesn’t take action to reduce the flood of Central American migrants across the Southern border of the U.S.

The proposed tariffs — which would start at 5% on goods crossing the border and could ramp up to 25% over time — would play havoc with supply chains in the auto industry.

To understand why, consider a vehicle’s wiring harness — the car’s nervous system, consisting of a complex network of wires that connect electronic components throughout the car body.

“It’s a huge, heavy bundle of wires and it’s gotten dramatically more complicated as cars become more electronic,” says Sue Helper, an economist at Case Western Reserve University. “If they’re done wrong, you can get electrical problems that you’ll never solve.”

All those wires are carefully laid out in the proper configuration (different for different car models) and bundled together before they’re installed in a vehicle. And for cars made in the U.S., that bundling almost always happens in Mexico — specifically, in Juárez. It’s time-intensive work, and labor is cheaper in Mexico.

But that’s just part of the picture.

The terminals on the ends of those wires might be built at an Aptiv factory in Warren, Ohio, shipped to Juárez for assembly into the wiring harness, and then shipped back to the U.S. to be installed in a car.

Smaller, stand-alone parts have their own wiring harnesses. For instance, a breakaway kit designed to stop a runaway trailer starts as a plastic box made by Hopkins Manufacturing Corp., in Emporia, Kan. Then it gets shipped to Juárez, where other components are combined and a wiring harness installed. Finally, the finished good comes back to the U.S. to go inside a trailer or to get sold to a consumer.

These goods start and finish in the U.S. but would be subject to tariffs under the new policy.

And it’s not clear just how hard those tariffs would hit.

Hopkins, the company manufacturing breakaway kits and other auto parts and accessories, currently has to pay duties only on the value that was added to the part while it was in Mexico. But CEO Brad Kraft says he is concerned that the tariffs proposed by the White House could be imposed on the total value of the good — which can be 10 times higher than the added value — every time it crosses the border.

If that’s how the tariffs are imposed, then when Hopkins Manufacturing brings a breakaway kit back into the U.S., the company would effectively be paying a tariff on the plastic box that it manufactured in Kansas.

The auto supply chain didn’t always involve so many parts crossing borders so many times. But over the past few decades, the system has dispersed geographically. That included wire bundling jobs once done in the U.S. being shifted to Mexico.

The supply chain could shift again in the future. But experts say these particular tariffs aren’t likely to bring any jobs back to the U.S. Instead, experts worry they could push assembly work from Mexico to other countries with low labor costs, which could actually lead to the loss of more American jobs.

“The wire that goes into those wire harnesses, the fabric that is coated around those wires, as well as all of the connectors are oftentimes made in the United States,” says Ann Wilson, the senior vice president of government affairs at the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association. “So if we make it more expensive to make wire harnesses in Mexico … and they move that offshore someplace else, we are going to lose those jobs in the United States.”

That might be a concern in the long term. For now, businesses aren’t ready to make drastic decisions like moving factories, given the profound uncertainty surrounding these tariffs.

In addition to the fluctuating amount — 5%, gradually rising to 25% — it’s not clear how long the tariffs might be in place; they’re pegged to progress on immigration, as defined by the administration’s “sole discretion and judgment.”

“What do we have to achieve in the immigration issue before suddenly the tariffs are now taken away?” asks Aaron Lowe, senior vice president for regulatory and government affairs for the Auto Care Association, which represents companies that provide aftermarket auto parts and services. “It’s very, very vague.”

Frontera Radiators and Parts, based in El Paso, Texas, right on the border, operates multiple manufacturing facilities in Mexico. It makes truck radiators that are no longer produced in the United States. CEO Arnoldo Ventura is considering buying products from competitors in India or Dubai, if the tariffs do make it up to 25%. But planning is difficult.

“Instead of looking forward a year or two years of planning, we’re just planning on every week,” Ventura says.

And Kraft of Hopkins Manufacturing says in this atmosphere of uncertainty, he can’t just pick up and move his factory from Juárez.

“There’s very little that we can do,” he says.

There’s only one thing, really. Prepare to pay the tariff — and pass the higher costs along to consumers.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

There Aren’t Enough Golfers To Keep All Of The U.S. Courses In Business

An estimated 800 golf courses have closed in the last decade, freeing up vast swaths of green space and a new “golf course gold rush” for developers and loss of public courses for golfers.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

There are more golf courses in the U.S. than anywhere else – about 2 million acres of green space all told. But there aren’t enough golfers to keep them all in business. Wisconsin Public Radio’s Phoebe Petrovic reports on the consequences.

PHOEBE PETROVIC, BYLINE: To understand what’s happening today, you need to understand what occurred about 30 years ago. In the late 1980s, golf was surging, and the National Golf Foundation encouraged the industry to build a course a day for 10 years.

Jeff Davis, with the firm Fairway Advisors, says that encouragement was taken to heart.

JEFF DAVIS: The genie was out of the bottle. Developers – all they heard – and the mantra became – was build a course a day. And they did it.

PETROVIC: Over a 20-year period up until the early 2000s, they built more than 4,000 new golf courses. Greg Nathan with the National Golf Foundation says many of those courses fit the same mold.

GREG NATHAN: There was a lot of expensive-to-build, expensive-to-maintain, high-greens-fee golf courses.

PETROVIC: And Jay Karen, who’s with the National Golf Course Owners Association, says it wasn’t the golf industry building the courses.

JAY KAREN: It was the homebuilding industry that really drove much of the boom. Homebuilders made new golf courses the central amenity in the communities that they built around the country.

PETROVIC: Communities like this one built in Florida in 2000.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: (As character) Waterlefe Golf & River Club, a one-of-a-kind residential community…

PETROVIC: In Florida, California, Pennsylvania, developers gobbled up land and built lush, rolling courses, surrounding them with expensive homes and hotels. Tiger Woods was in his prime, and residents sometimes paid millions to live in gated communities alongside golf courses.

But Karen says exclusive, expensive courses weren’t the only ones built in the ’90s.

KAREN: A lot of municipalities were also getting this exuberance around golf and wanted to add these crown jewels to their parks and recreation divisions and portfolios.

PETROVIC: But soon, there was too much supply and too little demand. The number of golfers and rounds played began to decline in the 2000s. And across the U.S., courses began to close – 10% of them since 2006. The National Golf Foundation says that reflects the market correcting itself. And for the remaining 14,000 courses, competition for players is fierce, especially for the almost 11,000 courses that are open to the public – whether daily fee courses owned by companies or municipal courses run by cities.

Madison, Wis., has more than a dozen golf courses in the area, and the city’s four municipal courses are in crisis. They’ve lost money for the last decade – almost a million dollars last year alone.

Brad Munn grew up playing on Madison’s municipal courses and now works on them. He’s at the Monona Golf Course today driving in a cart.

BRAD MUNN: This is one of my favorite ladies.

PETROVIC: Oh, yeah?

MUNN: Yeah. OK, I got the reporter here, Nancy. We’re ready to watch.

PETROVIC: Munn and Nancy Poole have known each other for about 30 years. She’s played this course nearly every week with her women’s group.

NANCY POOLE: We feel very strongly that it’s part of the Madison parks, like bike paths and ball diamonds and everything else. We need to keep it open.

PETROVIC: City leaders say they’re considering every option for the struggling courses, including closures. That worries Madison’s parks superintendent, Eric Knepp. He says losing municipal courses could limit access for everyday golfers.

ERIC KNEPP: American golf has always had a stodgy, affluent, elite feel. Now, I know that’s not our golfers, and I don’t think it’s good or healthy to have a space where we have 750 acres that are viewed as for these other people. That’s for golfers.

PETROVIC: The municipal courses make up almost a fifth of Madison’s park land. And Knepp says the best way to try to save them is to treat them as a public commons.

For NPR News, I’m Phoebe Petrovic in Madison.

(SOUNDBITE OF KARIM SAHRAOUI’S “BEFORE THE 2ND COMING”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What Missouri’s Fight Over Abortion Means For An Illinois Clinic Across The River

NPR’s Ari Shapiro talks with Alison Dreith, the director of Hope Clinic in Granite City, Ill., about how the uncertainty of Missouri’s last abortion clinic is affecting her patients and staff.



ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Missouri’s only clinic that performs abortions is fighting to stay open. That fight against the state’s health department is playing out in the courts today. Last week we asked the head of Missouri’s Department of Health and Senior Services, Randall Williams, how the closure of this clinic might affect Missouri women’s access to abortion.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED BROADCAST)

RANDALL WILLIAMS: Access is always important to us, and so as you know, Missouri is contiguous to eight states. And so there certainly are abortion facilities very close by in Illinois and Kansas.

SHAPIRO: Alison Dreith directs one of those nearby facilities. She runs the Hope Clinic in Granite, Ill., roughly 20 minutes’ drive from St. Louis. Welcome to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

ALISON DREITH: Thanks for having me.

SHAPIRO: How have you and your staff been preparing for the possibility that Missouri may one day be left without a clinic that provides abortions?

DREITH: Well, I think abortion providers all across the country have theoretically been planning for this day since Trump was elected to office, and those conversations have picked up more rapidly and frequently since the beginning of 2019. And now we have had to rapidly put in some of that crisis management planning into practice over these past two weeks.

SHAPIRO: Can you give us examples of some of the kinds of steps you’re talking about?

DREITH: Yeah, some of the steps we have taken is hiring new staff, considering patient flow and how to allow patients to expect the same safe and compassionate care that they always have from us without having to be in the clinic longer hours. We’ve been utilizing volunteers to do mundane clerical work for us that we once had the opportunity to do so. We’ve been increasing our number of patients and staying open longer hours than what we would have normally expected.

SHAPIRO: I imagine your clinic’s capacity is limited in some respect. Can you scale up to the degree that you think you might have to?

DREITH: Absolutely not right off the bat. We see about 3,000 patients a year here at Hope Clinic, and from the…

SHAPIRO: And is that all for abortions, or does that include STI treatment, birth control?

DREITH: Just abortions.

SHAPIRO: OK.

DREITH: The last report I think from the Guttmacher Institute of abortion patients in Missouri was 3,500 in 2017. That is more than double of what we currently see, and we wouldn’t expect to take on all of those patients where there are a number of neighboring states that could provide services much more close to home for patients. But we are in a unique position that we’re so close to downtown St. Louis and that remaining abortion provider in Missouri and that we also go to 24-weeks gestation, which a lot of our other neighboring states do not.

So we have already seen about a 30% increase of abortion patients in the past two years since Missouri passed its last ban on abortion in 2017, but we have seen an increase in those numbers already in 2019 compared to the same time last year. And we expect that to continue to go up not only with Missouri patients but from several other neighboring Midwest and states in the South.

SHAPIRO: You prepared for something similar to this in 2016 when Kentucky was left with only one clinic providing abortions. Has this been different from that?

DREITH: Yeah, I think so because all of our abortion providers and including myself are Missouri residents, and they also provide gynecological care in the state of Missouri. And so for a lot of reasons, we feel like we’re a clinic that is operating in two states – abiding by the Illinois law but also feeling the direct impact of what’s happening in Missouri both professionally and medically and also personally.

SHAPIRO: Alison Dreith is the director of the Hope Clinic in Granite, Ill., just outside St. Louis, Mo. Thanks so much for speaking with us today.

DREITH: Thanks, Ari. Have a great day.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Thistle & Shamrock: The Scottish Traditional Music Hall Of Fame

Christine Kydd.

Courtesy of the artist


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of the artist

Host Fiona Ritchie is joined by the well-loved singer of Scottish traditional and contemporary songs, Christine Kydd. Featuring songs from Christine’s new album Shift and Change, the conversation explores the appeal of traditional songs, the power of some legendary songwriters, and the evolution of Christine’s own work as a performer, educator and composer.

Hear the debut of this new collection of songs and join the company of Fiona and Christine.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)