May 9, 2019

No Image

Tense U.S.-China Trade Talks To Continue As Higher Tariffs Take Effect

A shopper browses digital products at a market in Beijing. Trade tensions between China and the United States have grown significantly this week, after the Trump administration accused Beijing of backing down from commitments it had made in trade negotiations.

Andy Wong/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andy Wong/AP

Updated at 12:01 a.m. ET Friday

U.S. and Chinese negotiators will resume their high-stakes trade negotiations in Washington on Friday, hours after a scheduled increase in U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods took effect.

The Trump administration raised tariffs on $200 billion in imported products from China at 12:01 a.m. ET Friday, significantly raising the stakes in the ongoing trade dispute with Beijing.

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin met with President Trump late Thursday to brief him on the negotiations, according to White House spokesman Judd Deere. Afterwards, Lighthizer and Mnuchin had a working dinner with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He and agreed to continue talks Friday morning, Deere said.

The two countries are attempting to reach an agreement that would address U.S. concerns about Chinese business practices, including intellectual property theft and state-subsidized companies.

Until last weekend, it appeared that a deal was in sight. But U.S. officials said this week that China had backtracked on commitments it had made earlier. They didn’t specify what the commitments were.

As a result, the Trump administration said it would increase existing tariffs on $200 billion worth of consumer and business products to 25% from 10%.

It wasn’t the first time that Trump said tariffs would rise. The president threatened to increase tariffs in January and March, but the administration held off both times to give negotiators more time to make a deal.

Financial markets have fallen this week in response to the escalation of the trade dispute and the prospect of higher tariffs. The S&P 500 is on track for its biggest decline of the year. The Dow fell 138.97 points Thursday.

The tariffs are imposed when the products are brought into the United States, which means the cost is borne by importers, who can either pay it themselves or pass it on to customers. In some cases, Chinese exporters may also be persuaded to lower their prices before the goods are shipped.

Trump recently said the United States can take in $120 billion a year in tariffs, “paid for mostly by China,” but economists say much of it will be paid by U.S. businesses and consumers.

The tariffs will be applied only to goods shipped after Friday. That will provide some relief to U.S. businesses that have orders in transit.

On Thursday, Trump seemed to hold out hope that an agreement could still be reached to prevent the tariff hikes, noting that he had received a “beautiful” letter from Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“I have no idea what’s going to happen,” Trump said.

In China, some economists said the trade war would slow the country’s economic growth and the government may need more economic stimulus to soften the blow.

The Chinese government controls media in the country and has been steadily working to prevent the public from seeing news that Trump threatened more tariffs by removing content from social media sites.

“I don’t know much about what’s going on,” a 45-year-old man named Jo Jiun Hwei told NPR this week. “I think it’s the American president’s fault. That’s what they’re saying on the news at least.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

With Some Players Bowing Out, Trump Hosts Red Sox At The White House

President Trump holds up a Red Sox team jersey that was presented to him by outfielder J.D. Martinez Thursday at the White House.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

President Trump honored the 2018 World Series Champion Boston Red Sox at a White House ceremony Thursday, lauding the team as a “shining example of excellence” in “an American sporting tradition that goes back many generations.”

But the tradition of an apolitical While House celebration has become something of a thing of the past, with the invitation from Trump becoming more of a loaded loyalty test, forcing players to pick sides. Roughly a third of the team skipped the event in protest.

The day began with many mocking the White House for its online gaffe welcoming the “Boston Red Socks.”

“I need you to go to a store there in Boston and buy a package of red socks. Yes, that’s right, red ones. Well the Sox aren’t going to make it to the White House so I thought the President could welcome some actual red socks.” https://t.co/lrIdi7Dj35

— John Litzler (@JohnLitzler) May 9, 2019

But the Sox are having their own awkward moment, as those who attended the White House celebration, and those who passed, are divided almost perfectly along racial lines. Every white player went, while almost every person of color who wears a Sox uniform opted out, including Mookie Betts, Jackie Bradley Jr., Xander Bogaerts and David Price.

Manager Alex Cora says it was the Trump administration’s position on hurricane relief to his native Puerto Rico that was keeping him away, according to the English online version of the Puerto Rican newspaper El Nuevo Día.

I’ve used my voice on many occasions so that Puerto Ricans are not forgotten,” Cora told the paper. “And my absence [from the White House] is no different. As such, at this moment, I don’t feel comfortable celebrating in the White House.”

President Trump poses with the 2018 World Series Champion Boston Red Sox at the White House on Thursday.

Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

The Red Sox players are hardly the first to stay home to protest the Trump administration. But it comes as the ball club has been making great efforts to live down its reputation as a racist organization, a legacy that owner John Henry has said has “haunted” the team. Last year, the team successfully fought to change the name of Yawkey Street alongside Fenway Park to distance the team from its late former owner Tom Yawkey, who was known as much for his historically racist ball club as he was for his great philanthropy.

The team’s current owners have also launched a program promoting inclusion called “Take the Lead,” and they have taken a zero-tolerance stance against racist fans, banning offenders for life. Red Sox CEO Sam Kennedy says the team didn’t want to make a political statement by snubbing the White House. But many say the Sox split decision is another kind of statement.

“It’s basically the white Sox who’ll be going,” as one local sportswriter put it.

Alex Cora has confirmed newspaper report he will not make the trip to meet the president. So basically it’s the white Sox who’ll be going.

— Steve Buckley (@BuckinBoston) May 5, 2019

Many fans cringed at the optics and the message, tweeting “shame on you all” and calling out the players who went for not staying back in solidarity with their teammates.

The players who did attend beamed beside the president, as he praised their winning season. Red Sox starting pitcher Chris Sale called it “a very high honor … that we appreciate.”

Good for him! And shame on his disgusting teammates. Much love for JBJ and every @RedSox player who stands in solidarity with him and stays home https://t.co/dfqluQd312

— Annina García ? (@agcia87) May 9, 2019

Outfielder J.D. Martinez, of Cuban descent, was the only person of color to attend. He thanked the president for his hospitality and for “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be honored … at the White House.”

The team has been trying to downplay any tensions in the clubhouse, and many players have declined to discuss their decisions. But former player David Ortiz was less circumspect, telling WEEI sports radio he would have definitely skipped the event, which he compared to “shak[ing] hands with the enemy.”

“I’m an immigrant,” said Ortiz, who became a U.S. citizen after arriving from the Dominican Republic. “You don’t want to go and shake hands with a guy who is treating immigrants like [expletive].”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Experimental Drug For Huntington’s Disease Jams Malfunctioning Gene

An MRI scan shows signs of atrophy in the brain of a patient with Huntington’s disease.



Science Photo Library/Science Source


hide caption

toggle caption



Science Photo Library/Science Source

Scientists are gearing up a major study to find out whether a drug can silence the gene that causes a devastating illness called Huntington’s disease.

This development follows the discovery that the experimental drug reduced levels of the damaged protein that causes this mind-robbing ailment. The new study will determine whether that drug can also stop progression of the disease.

It is also another sign that drugs built with DNA, or its cellular collaborator RNA, can be powerful tools for tempering diseases that until now have seemed out of reach.

Huntington’s disease is an apt target because it’s caused by a single mutated gene. It also a frightening and devastating disease.

The symptoms “are like having Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and ALS [Lou Gehrig’s disease] simultaneously, when it’s in full swing,” says Jeanette Garcia, a 57-year-old advocate in San Jose, Calif.

If one of your parents has Huntington’s disease, there’s a 50-50 chance you will get it, too. About 30,000 people in the United States carry the deadly gene.

Garcia and her nine siblings lost their mother to the disease. They know the terrible odds. When they get together for family reunions and talk turns to Huntington’s, “it is all of a sudden this terrifying prospect we’re all faced with,” she says.

Jeanette Garcia discovered through genetic testing that she is going to develop Huntington’s disease, eventually.

Courtesy of Jeanette Garcia


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Jeanette Garcia

Garcia decided to take the genetic test for this condition in 2008 and found out she had inherited the damaged gene. She’s recently been seeing the first signs of the illness, including involuntary movements, which she noticed when watching a video of herself, “and I went, ‘Holy crap, OK here we go.’ “

But her disease is emerging at what could be a fortunate moment. She’s heading off to a neurologist to see if she would qualify for a study that is generating a lot of excitement.

Last year, drugmaker Roche’s Genentech unit said that an experimental drug sharply reduced the amount of illness-inducing protein measured in people’s spinal fluid. The results of that study, involving 46 patients, were published Monday by the New England Journal of Medicine.

The protein isn’t eliminated entirely with the experimental drug, but animal experiments suggest that reducing it significantly could be enough to stave off symptoms.

The researchers are now about to launch a trial involving 660 volunteers with early symptoms of the disease, to see if the drug, called RG6042, can slow or stop Huntington’s progression.

“It’s so exciting,” Garcia says. “I want to be a part of it.”

This study marks a milestone for Huntington’s disease. More than 25 years ago, a scientist named Nancy Wexler was able to identify the errant gene that causes the disease by painstakingly studying families in a region of Venezuela where the disease is nearly epidemic.

Her finding was one of the early, great successes in tracking down disease genes. But it has taken all the intervening years to develop this promising angle of attack.

One huge advance has been the development of methods to silence a damaged gene, so cells don’t convert those errant instructions into dangerous proteins, such as the one that causes the symptoms of Huntington’s.

Scientists have developed several methods to jam this signal. The Roche drug uses a custom-built piece of genetic material called an antisense oligonucleotide to block the process. Other advanced research projects aimed at Huntington’s and other diseases use a technique called RNA interference to accomplish a similar result.

Another major challenge has been to figure out how to get the drug into the brain. Scientists at Ionis Pharmaceuticals in San Diego figured out how to make that happen with the antisense oligonucleotide targeting Huntington’s.

The answer turned out to be injecting it into spinal fluid, which circulates up and down the spine and into the brain. “The drug could actually transfer quite readily to the brain and then sink into the target brain tissue,” says Dr. Scott Schobel, who heads the research effort on this drug at Roche, which is co-developing the experimental drug with Ionis.

Roche started recruiting patients for this study in January, but halted the trial to redesign it, after discovering the drug didn’t need to be injected as often as they had planned.

“We’re going to get back up and running over the next several weeks to months,” Schobel says.

The study is supposed to follow patients for 25 months, which should be enough time to determine whether people’s symptoms are held in check by the treatment.

George Yohrling, a scientist at the Huntington’s Disease Society of America, says his main concern is whether the experimental drug will penetrate deeply enough into the brain to stop the disease.

If not, he says other treatments under development could succeed in that regard. One strategy is to use viruses to deliver one of these gene-silencing drugs.

“A lot of different approaches are being worked on in different stages of drug discovery across the world,” Yohrling says. “It’s really quite exciting.”

This development follows more than 20 years of boom-and-bust excitement about gene-silencing strategies.

“Initially there was wild enthusiasm,” says Dr. Judy Lieberman, a professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. “There were literally hundreds of biotech companies formed to do that.”

But they quickly hit technical and scientific roadblocks, she says, “and eventually almost all of them about abandoned these efforts.”

As scientists gradually worked their way through these challenges, Huntington’s disease emerged as an appealing target, despite being a rare disease with a far smaller potential market than, for example, a drug for Alzheimer’s disease.

The first antisense oligonucleotide to be approved as a drug by the Food and Drug Administration treats an even rarer condition, called spinal muscular atrophy. And there are now competitive products targeting that disease, thanks in part to the financial incentives drug companies get to develop drugs for “orphan” diseases. (The drugs are also extraordinarily expensive).

Drug developers are also aware that this strategy could be useful for common disorders, such as high cholesterol. That’s an active area for drug development.

Drug companies would jump on an opportunity to develop a drug for Alzheimer’s or autism, Yohrling says, if only they could identify a straightforward target gene to disrupt. That strategy “now makes the ‘undruggable’ druggable,” he says.

But that’s getting ahead of the story. Before the FDA even considers approving a treatment for Huntington’s, Roche will have to demonstrate that its experimental drug is safe and effective.

Garcia is eager to help them make that case, by joining the study if she can, and encouraging others to do the same. She says she can’t even let herself hope that the treatment will work for her. She’s thinking of her four children and six grandchildren.

She has a grandson who was born blind and is also at risk for Huntington’s, she says. “I’m just not going to stop because I don’t want him to have to deal with this.”

You can contact NPR Science Correspondent Richard Harris at rharris@npr.org.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)