March 19, 2019

No Image

Economic Report Of The President … And Some Superhero Friends

Actor Tom Holland attends the Spider-Man: Homecoming press conference at Conrad Seoul Hotel on July 3, 2017, in Seoul, South Korea.

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

With great power, comes great responsibility.

Or the chance to pull a practical joke.

Pranksters included some whimsical credits buried in the fine print of an annual White House economic report, making it seem that Peter Parker and Aunt May had joined the staff of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Spider-Man’s alter ego and his aunt are listed among the interns who contributed to the 705-page report, which is nearly a year in the making. Other high-profile interns listed include John Cleese of Monty Python fame, Star Trek character Kathryn Janeway and the uncaped Batman, Bruce Wayne — suggesting the CEA plays no favorites between the Marvel and DC Comics universes.

Martha Gimbel, research director at Indeed.com, was one of many economists who picked up on the stunt, tweeting, “The quality of interns at CEA is much better than when I was there.”

“Who said economics has to be a dismal science,” the council responded in its own tweet. “Our interns are indeed super heroes,” it added in another tweet.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Mike Trout To Finalize $430 Million Contract With Los Angeles Angels

Mike Trout and the Los Angeles Angels are finalizing a $430 million contract, the largest in professional sports history. NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly speaks with Jonah Keri of The Athletic.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

To potential news now of the biggest contract in baseball history. Now, if you’re having a flashback moment, that might be because not even three weeks ago, we reported that star outfielder Bryce Harper was signing a $330 million deal with the Philadelphia Phillies. Alas, Bryce Harper’s record deal may not stand long because today we learned that LA Angels star Mike Trout is finalizing a deal to stay with that team for another 12 years and to earn $430 million over that time. To talk about what may become the latest largest contract in baseball history, we are joined by Jonah Keri of the website The Athletic. Welcome.

JONAH KERI: Thank you for having me.

KELLY: What makes Mike Trout worth $430 million?

KERI: Well, the short version is if you’re a baseball historian, you’re probably familiar with a gentleman named Willie Mays. Willie Mays is one of the two or three greatest players of all time, and Mike Trout is essentially Willie Mays. When you look at their statistics, for the first seven full years of their careers, pretty much identical – offensively, defensively, base running. That’s how great he is. And Trout is also quite young relatively speaking to be so accomplished. He’s just in his late 20s right now, should have many more years of productivity. So you’re talking about the greatest player of his era. Right now, he’s got the same numbers as one of the greatest players of all time. And he’s young, so there’s room to project much more. That’s why he’s making the money that he’s going to make.

KELLY: Yeah. I was reading Sports Illustrated had a profile of him last year, and they called him the best individual asset baseball has – for years, its undisputed best player; sounds like you would agree.

KERI: No doubt. He’s actually won several MVP awards, but you could argue that he should have been the most valuable player six of the seven years that he’s played in the league. That is really, really hard to do.

KELLY: However, I’ll push back at you and ask this – can any player be worth that much, particularly one who, by the end of this 12-year contract, is going to be pushing 40?

KERI: Well, this is where people might get angry at me, but I would argue that Mike Trout is underpaid at $430 million.

KELLY: OK. Make the case.

KERI: Well, there you go. Professional athletics, listen; it’s not the same as fighting fires or teaching school, certainly, but if you look at supply and demand, how many people on Earth can do what Mike Trout can do? One. Mike Trout is the only guy.

KELLY: Let me channel my inner skeptic here, though, because no matter how great you are, you can’t win the World Series by yourself. Does paying so much money to one player maybe take away from possibility to sign other valuable players to fill out the roster?

KERI: It gives you an idea of the immense cash cow that is baseball. So if a team says, woe is us, we can’t spend money, we have an expensive outfielder – that is hooey and applesauce. It ain’t true. You can go out and get as many pitchers as you want, as many second baseman as you want. You could fill your roster with all kinds of superstar players to complement the Trout and still be left with a profit.

KELLY: Big picture – what is going on in baseball with, you know, the all-time record deal that Bryce Harper just signed getting overtaken within just weeks?

KERI: Yeah. It’s kind of a coincidence. Harper and Trout came into the major leagues at roughly the same time, along with Manny Machado, by the way, who also signed a tremendously large contract this offseason. And so all these guys happen…

KELLY: A mere $300 million, as I remember.

KERI: Exactly. So when you’ve got players coming up on free agency, that’s when they get paid. It’s a little bit different than other sports where if you are in the NFL or the NBA, especially the NFL, you get paid a lot of money right off. In baseball, your salary is kind of suppressed for the first six years of your career. In some ways, you’re even more underpaid to that point. So it’s only when you get to cash in on free agency or near free agency that the big contracts come in. This year, you had Harper and Machado both coming out and Trout being two years away from free agency being the talk of baseball. Everybody said here’s Harper. What’s going to happen with Trout? We know what happened with Mike Trout. He’s $430 million richer.

KELLY: Thank you, Jonah.

KERI: Thank you.

KELLY: Jonah Keri writes about baseball for the website The Athletic.

(SOUNDBITE OF J RICK’S “SHORT”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'Mother Jones' Investigation Takes A Look At The World Of Drug Treatment Programs

NPR’s Ailsa Chang talks with Mother Jones reporter Julia Lurie about the loosely regulated rehab industry, and how it shuffles people in and out of treatment programs and cashes in on insurance money.



AILSA CHANG, HOST:

Naturally a parent whose child is addicted to opioids would want them in rehab and would want their insurance to cover them for as long as it takes. But for Becki Sarnicky’s son Nick, what seemed like the best way to help him wasn’t.

BECKI SARNICKY: He went through more rehabs than I can count. And I could tell something wasn’t right.

CHANG: It turns out a so-called patient broker was making money off her son, shopping him to different rehab centers, putting him up in hotels in between, supplying him with drugs. Nick was in four rehabs in five weeks, racking up more than $100,000 in insurance charges in that time.

SARNICKY: At one point, I called my insurance. And I asked them to stop paying for the rehab because it wasn’t helping him. It was – he was getting worse every time he went away.

CHANG: Nick died of an overdose in 2017. He was 23. Becki Sarnicky wants more people to know this is happening, which is why she told her story to reporter Julia Lurie for the Mother Jones podcast and magazine. For nine months, Lurie investigated the loosely regulated, lucrative world of addiction treatment.

Welcome.

JULIA LURIE: Thank you so much.

CHANG: So unfortunately, you found in your reporting that Nick’s story is not at all unusual. Can you first explain how these patient brokers work? How do they find and make money off addicts?

LURIE: Sure, absolutely. So there’s this whole sort of cottage industry that’s developed in the murkier parts of the rehab world, where brokers will find people in Facebook support groups, at meetings like Narcotics Anonymous meetings or Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. Sometimes, they’ll just find people on the streets in, say, Southern California or Palm Beach. And they’ll offer perks – say, free rent at a sober home or a few nights at a hotel between rehabs, sometimes even cash.

CHANG: And then at the back end, the broker gets a cut of the insurance money that was paid to the rehab center. That’s how they make money.

LURIE: Yes, exactly. So it’s very easy for patients to then fall into this cycle where they go to rehab for a few days or weeks, you know, as long as insurance will cover it. The rehab collects insurance money. The broker will get a cut of that. The patient will leave and relapse, sometimes with drugs or money that the broker has given them. And then the patient goes back to rehab. And that just happens over and over and over again without the patient ever really getting better.

CHANG: I’m sure there are a lot of people thinking, this has to be illegal, right?

LURIE: Yes. And in fact, it is illegal. Just late last year, Congress passed legislation that prohibits people, namely rehabs or patient brokers, from giving or receiving perks for patients. That said, it’s relatively new legislation. And also, it’s a federal law, so it’s up to federal authorities to really enforce it.

CHANG: Right.

LURIE: So there’s sort of a slow and steady move towards regulating this field and for enforcing those regulations. But in the meantime, you have a lot of patient brokering going on.

CHANG: Not every rehab center, obviously, participates in these kinds of practices. But for those that do, I was amazed reading in your story how little oversight there has been over this industry. I mean, you mentioned California, for example. A counselor just needs to complete nine hours of orientation, and then they’re employable as a rehab counselor.

LURIE: Right, exactly. You know, often, drug policy experts will point out that the basic rules of medicine don’t really seem to apply to addiction treatment. You know, many rehabs don’t employ a single licensed doctor.

CHANG: That’s amazing.

LURIE: Yeah, right. Imagine going into any clinic or hospital and them saying, you know, we don’t have any doctors or nurses on staff here.

CHANG: Right. I mean, how did it even get like that in the first place? Why don’t the rules of medicine apply to addiction treatment?

LURIE: Until very recently, addiction was understood as a moral failing. So it was something that, you know, you did wrong. And you should maybe go to prison or maybe go to a beachy place off the grid, where you can get, quote, unquote, “clean” and then return to your normal life. It’s only very recently that we’ve come to appreciate that addiction is a disease. And, you know, I think that’s happened for a lot of reasons. Our understanding of the brain is a lot better, certainly. The face of addiction has changed as well. You know, the opioid epidemic is…

CHANG: Wider.

LURIE: …A far wider…

CHANG: Yeah.

LURIE: …Drug problem than previous drug epidemics in this country. So, you know, now we’re in this position where we have a historic drug epidemic, and we have this soaring demand for evidence-based treatment. But addiction is really siloed outside of the medical world.

CHANG: So what do you see could be the solution? How do you revamp the industry when it comes to the opioid epidemic?

LURIE: Well, that is a – that’s, like, the million-dollar question (laughter). I think that it’s going to take a lot of things happening simultaneously. I do think that you need higher standards for rehabs. I do think that if you’re going to be a rehab, you should probably have to have a licensed doctor on staff. You should probably have higher regulatory requirements than, like, nail technicians or barbershops, which is not the case currently in a lot of places.

One pretty critical thing that is needed right now is a place where users and their family members and loved ones can go and check out a given rehab. What are the complaints that have been filed against this place? What kind of staff does it have? Some sort of database like that – that would go a very, very long way.

CHANG: Julia Lurie is a reporter for Mother Jones. Her piece on the rehab industry is in the current issue of the magazine. Thank you very much for joining us.

LURIE: Thank you for having me.

(SOUNDBITE OF UOU’S “HANAUTA”)

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Alt.Latino's SXSW 2019 Wrap-Up

The Cuban band Cimafunk performs onstage for NPR’s Alt.Latino showcase during SXSW 2019.

Hutton Supancic/Getty Images for SXSW


hide caption

toggle caption

Hutton Supancic/Getty Images for SXSW

I struggled to balance the conflicting emotions of enjoying the musical celebration that is the annual SXSW Festival with the pain of the devastating loss of life in Friday’s terrorist attack in New Zealand. It was an emotional push and pull that I kept completely to myself.

But as I reflected back on the week of interviews and performances I was reminded that many of the musicians I cover on this beat often include messages in their music about respect and dignity for people who are different. They lend their musical gifts to movements that fight for social justice in their home countries. And as I reported on NPR’s All Things Considered, sometimes they put themselves in danger by refusing to be silenced.

It was a reminder that what happens in Austin every year can be much more than a bunch of bands looking for their next big break. It’s really a celebration of the freedom of expression. For some bands, the members are indeed looking for their next big break so they can carry their messages of social justice and inclusion even further.

I left Austin grieving but also comforted by the fact that music can indeed challenge and change the world we live in. I’m thankful that it’s my job to help spread that healing energy. Join AltLatino contributors Marisa Arbona- Ruiz and Catalina Maria Johnson and I this week as we retrace which bands gave us joy and also inspired us.

[embedded content]

Let’s block ads! (Why?)