November 30, 2018

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Solo: A Star Wars Story' VFX Breakdown, Every Pixar Easter Egg and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

VFX Breakdown of the Day:

Industrial Light & Magic shared a video showcasing their digital effects work for the Corellia chase in Solo: A Star Wars Story:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Here’s a fan that’s surely very excited for the upcoming live-action remake of The Lion King:

Best cosplay ever…???? pic.twitter.com/r4mb85tBx3

— Chris Underwood (@ChrisNavarroG) November 30, 2018

Movie Comparison of the Day:

Dimitri Bitu compares the overlapping sequences of Marlin meeting Dory in Finding Nemo and Finding Dory side by side:

[embedded content]

Studio History of the Day:

Speaking of Pixar movies, here’s ScreenCrush with a spotlight on all the Easter eggs in the studio’s movies in just 20 minutes:

[embedded content]

Video Essay of the Day:

This Now You See It video by Jack Nugent analyzes the meaning of characters riding horses in movies:

[embedded content]

Vintage Images of the Day:

Terrence Malick, who turns 75 today, directs Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek on the set of Badlands in 1972:

On the set of Terrence Malick’s Badlands, 1972 http://t.co/giCNtkWBut pic.twitter.com/vvSkkR2NHK

— Film History In Pics (@FilmHistoryPics) January 15, 2015

Filmmaker in Focus:

This Screened video by Moises and Sergio Velasquez examines the way violence is handled in Guillermo del Toro movies:

[embedded content]

Actor in the Spotlight:

For IMDb, Brandon Hardesty and Kenny Johnson look at the early roles of actress Emma Stone:

[embedded content]

Screenwriting Lesson of the Day:

In honor of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald being out in theaters, Just Write looks at how J.K. Rowling writes mystery elements in the new spinoff series:

[embedded content]

Classic Movie Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th anniversary of the premiere of Schindler’s List. Watch the original trailer for the classic Spielberg movie below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Trump And Chinese President Xi Look For Progress In Trade Dispute At G20 Summit

President Trump and China’s President Xi may have an announcement on trade on Saturday, but it will likely be a decision to push back deadlines rather than a breakthrough agreement.



MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have a working dinner tomorrow in Buenos Aires on the sidelines of the G-20 meeting. Will they make progress in solving their trade disputes? Well, President Trump fielded a question along those lines earlier today from a reporter in Buenos Aires.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: And we’re working very hard. If we could make a deal, that would be good. I think they want to, and I think we’d like to. And we’ll see.

KELLY: And we’ll see. Well, NPR’s John Ydstie joins us now to talk about just what we might see. Hey there, John.

JOHN YDSTIE, BYLINE: Hi, Mary Louise.

KELLY: So we’ve watched this trade dispute between the U.S. and China go from nasty to nastier with both of them slapping tariffs back and forth on each other. Can Trump and Xi get negotiations back on track?

YDSTIE: Well, both sides hope so. And if they don’t, the dispute could get even nastier. The U.S. already has tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods coming into the U.S. On January 1, those tariffs are set to go up from 10 percent to 25 percent. And President Trump says if there’s not progress, he’ll levy tariffs on another $267 billion worth of Chinese products. That would raise the cost of virtually every Chinese import into the U.S. Of course China already has tariffs on U.S. goods, too, and they say they’ll respond to any U.S. escalation.

KELLY: OK, so no shortage of threats from either side. But on substance, how far apart are China and the U.S.?

YDSTIE: Well, that’s the problem. They’re not close, not close at all. But in recent weeks, U.S. and Chinese officials have been trying to hammer out at least some kind of cease-fire in this trade war. Among the things they could do is the U.S. could agree not to raise the current tariffs from 10 to 25 percent as planned and not put tariffs on the additional amount of Chinese goods. In exchange, you know, China might reduce a few tariffs on U.S. products or make some commitment to reduce its trade surplus with the U.S.

KELLY: Which I guess would walk them back from the cliff a little bit. But what about the central demand that the U.S. has made of China, which is ending the theft of intellectual property? What kind of prospects are you seeing for progress there?

YDSTIE: Well, not a lot at this meeting. Making real progress in those areas will take time, and the groundwork really hasn’t been laid. U.S. trade ambassador Robert Lighthizer said on Wednesday, quote, “China has not come to the table with proposals for meaningful reform.” So a breakthrough deal is highly unlikely. One possibility, though, is that they might agree on a framework for moving forward on these issues where the U.S. wants action. But the Chinese have complained that the Trump administration hasn’t been clear on exactly what it wants, so there’s still a lot of work to do.

KELLY: One thing we know about President Trump is he likes to make deals. Do we know how motivated he is and how motivated Xi is to come to some kind of agreement?

YDSTIE: Yeah, I think there are reasons for both presidents to want to make some kind of deal. For Trump, there are growing pressures to make progress on trade. One is the U.S. stock market. It’s still well off, its recent highs, partly because of uncertainty caused by trade tensions. And remember; Trump kind of used the stock market as a measure of the success of his policies.

Also, remember; earlier this week, GM said Trump’s tariffs cost the company an additional billion dollars. That was at the same time as GM announced the shutdown of several U.S. auto plants. And that certainly got the president’s attention. As for President Xi, you know, China’s economic growth has slowed considerably, and these trade issues are contributing to that. He would like to eliminate the drag on China’s economy. So we’ll see what happens on Saturday.

KELLY: We’ll see – the words of the president. NPR’s John Ydstie, thank you.

YDSTIE: You’re very welcome.

KELLY: And, John, you knew we weren’t going to let you escape the studio without mentioning that we’re not going to get to talk to you quite so often going forward because this is your last day.

YDSTIE: This is my last day.

KELLY: How many years – you’re retiring after how many years at NPR?

YDSTIE: Thirty-nine years, almost…

KELLY: Thirty-nine.

YDSTIE: …Four decades.

KELLY: We threw you a farewell party…

YDSTIE: Yes, you did.

KELLY: …On Tuesday in the NPR canteen in which I got all choked up. I have no idea how you made it through all the toasts.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Well, what the listener can’t see is the enormous smile on John’s face right now.

KELLY: Yeah.

(LAUGHTER)

CORNISH: We are sending you into this next…

YDSTIE: Yeah.

CORNISH: …Chapter…

KELLY: Well, we…

CORNISH: …Cheerily I think.

YDSTIE: Yeah, you are. But, you know, I feel so fortunate to have been part of this wonderful organization for four decades.

KELLY: Yeah.

YDSTIE: You know, watched it become a force – this makes a profound difference in the lives of millions of people. I am deeply grateful for the opportunity. I’ve had to bear witness to some inflection points in history like the collapse of the Soviet Union, the creation of the European Union and the first Gulf War, the global financial crisis. But among the greatest privileges has been to do this with you and all of our NPR colleagues, the best colleagues anyone could hope for. I’ll miss seeing you every day, but I hope I’ll be back now and then to do a project or fill in for someone who needs a break.

KELLY: John Ydstie, the feeling is mutual. And we thank you and your family for 39 great years.

YDSTIE: Thank you.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Changes In Brain Scans Seen After A Single Season Of Football For Young Players

MRI scans before and after a season of football showed brain changes in a study of high school players.

groveb/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

groveb/Getty Images

A single season playing football might be all it takes to change a young athlete’s brain.

Those are the preliminary findings of research presented this week in Chicago at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America.

Researchers used special MRI methods to look at nerve bundles in the brain in a study of the brains of 26 young male football players, average age 12, before and after one season. Twenty-six more young males who didn’t play football also got MRI scans at the same time to be used as a control group.

In the youths who played football, the researchers found that nerve fibers in their corpus callosum — the band that connects the two halves of brain — changed over the season, says lead study author Jeongchul Kim, a research associate in the Radiology Informatics and Imaging Laboratory at Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C.

“We applied here two different imaging approaches,” he says. One analyzed the shape of the nerve fibers and the other focused on the integrity of the nerves.

Kim says the researchers found some nerve bundles grew longer and other bundles became shorter, or contracted, after the players’ initial MRI scans at the beginning of the season. He says they saw no changes in the integrity of the bundles.

The team says these results suggest that repeated blows to the head could lead to changes in the shape of the corpus callosum, which is critical to integrating cognitive, motor and sensory functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, during a critical time for brain development in young people.

The researchers say their ultimate goal is to help inform guidelines for safer football play for youths.

A series of MRI images shows the signs of strain in nerve fibers following a season of football.

Courtesy of Wake Forest School of Medicine


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Wake Forest School of Medicine

Since the discovery of the degenerative brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy in the early 2000s, most of the research into the consequences of repeated head injuries during sports has been on adult athletes. This focus has occurred despite growing concerns that young athletes who experience the same kinds of collisions may also be vulnerable to their effects.

Radiologist Christopher Whitlow, a co-author of the new findings, says while the stories about NFL and collegiate players are very important, they have to be put into context.

“You have to understand that the NFL players were also most likely once collegiate players, they were also high school players and they were also probably youth players,” he says. “To us, it’s more than a question about concussions, it’s a question about long-term cumulative exposure.”

That being said, both Whitlow and Kim caution against making their findings out to be more than what they are: preliminary results from a single study with a relatively small number of participants.

“We don’t know what it means,” says Whitlow. “The natural next question is, do these changes persist over time? Do they accumulate with multiple seasons? And then No. 3, probably the most important: Do they have any relevance to long-term health?”

The results, presented at a medical meeting, haven’t been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Whitlow says that the team is working on a paper to be submitted to a journal.

These latest findings are actually part of a years-long research collaboration among University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Wake Forest University and Children’s National Health System in Washington, D.C.

Dr. Gerard Gioia is a pediatric neuropsychologist at Children’s National Health whose role in the larger study is to look at the functional outcomes of kids playing football. He says these latest findings are only a part of the piece of the puzzle they’re trying to solve.

“Everybody wants to know, ‘Should my kid play football? Should my kid play soccer? Should my kid play ice hockey?’ And we say, ‘Can we please study this and understand it?’ ” says Gioia, who has been pushing for funding for more long-term studies into youth and sports.

For now, he says, they still have a lot of unanswered questions.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)