November 26, 2018

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Anna and the Apocalypse' Music Video, How to Be a Great Line Producer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Music Video of the Day:

In honor of this week’s release of Anna and the Apocalypse, here’s the clip-filled music video for Ben Wiggins’ “Soldier at War” off the movie’s soundtrack:

[embedded content]

Movie Comparison of the Day:

In honor of the hit sequel Ralph Breaks the Internet, Couch Tomato shows 24 reasons why Wreck-It Ralph is the same movie as Shrek:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Speaking of Ralph Breaks the Internet, here’s a Disney Princess cosplayer with a good point:

” I wore Cinderella because I thought it be nice to use this opportunity to show girls and guys of color that you can cosplay whoever you want. I wanted to show that cosplay is for everyone!” – Alyssa Sneed pic.twitter.com/Nh8WqvK6jt

— ejen @ Ikkicon (@cosplayamerica) November 25, 2018

Video Essay of the Day:

The latest video from Renegade Cut examines the Catholic themes in Sam Mendes’ Road to Perdition:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Bernardo Bertolucci, who died today at age 77, directs Robert De Niro and Gerard Depardieu on the set of his 1976 movie 1900:

Filmmaker in Focus:

For Fandor, Philip Brubaker and Andrew Warner look at the influence of Carl Jung on the movies of Terry Gilliam:

[embedded content]

Film Studies Lesson of the Day:

Also for Fandor, Jacob T. Swinney explores what food means for characters in the movies, including those in The Breakfast Club and Pulp Fiction:

[embedded content]

Filmmaking Lesson of the Day:

Ever wonder what a line producer does? The latest video from Studio Binder spotlights the job and how to be good at it:

[embedded content]

Screenwriting Lesson of the Day:

The new Lessons from the Screenplay video shows how the first 10 pages of the script for The Devil Wears Prada is a good example of how to write a good movie opening:

[embedded content]

Classic Movie Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 80th anniversary of the release of Angels with Dirty Faces. Watch the original trailer for the classic gangster movie below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Super-Fast Shipping Comes With High Environmental Costs

Getting your online purchase delivered at home in just two days puts more polluting vehicles on the road. M. Sanjayan, the CEO of Conservation International, explains what that means for the planet.



AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Black Friday may be over, but there’s still a lot of Cyber Monday left. And companies like Amazon and Walmart are touting free two-day shipping to entice you to click buy on that must-have item.

M SANJAYAN: The problem with that is that it does not allow for the most efficient method to be used to ship those goods to us.

CORNISH: That’s M. Sanjayan, CEO of Conservation International. He studied the environmental effects of super-fast shipping with the University of California.

SANJAYAN: While online shopping does have a smaller carbon footprint than traditional retail shopping, it’s only really better for the environment if you don’t get rush delivery.

MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

Sanjayan says trucks from online retailers may go out less than full to get you your products more quickly. But it can increase harmful emissions. And another aspect of online shopping, returned items, has the same effect.

SANJAYAN: We generally think online shopping is better for the environment because it saves you from driving around, trying to find a place to get things and all of that. That only works if you’re not constantly returning things. So if you are a kind of person that buys a lot of things, tries them all out, then does multiple returns, then it’s really not going to actually be better for the planet.

KELLY: Still, with a little patience, we can get the goods we love and try to help keep the environment cleaner.

SANJAYAN: By basically checking the take your time and deliver this to me in the best method possible would mean that the trucks are going to be filled to the brim with goods when they’re being sent, and the company’s going to use the most efficient way to get it there.

CORNISH: Some companies say that their big warehouses, called fulfillment centers, are located near their customers, thus cutting down on long-haul trucking. But Sanjayan says that’s just shifting the problem.

SANJAYAN: The vast majority of stuff is still getting from Point A to Point B. It still has to get to those fulfillment centers.

CORNISH: A Walmart representative told us the company does a number of things to reduce its carbon footprint, like asking people to bundle their purchases and pick them up at stores. But Sanjayan also thinks companies can be more upfront when telling you there could be a greener way to ship your goods.

SANJAYAN: Wouldn’t it be fantastic if there was a green button that when you go and shop online, whether you’re shopping at Amazon or Walmart or any other store, you press that green button, and it assures you maximum efficiency within some reasonable period? So it says, within five days, we’ll get this to you in the most efficient means possible. It would be even better if that green button also took some of those savings that the company is now seeing because they don’t have to pay high shipping costs, and that savings is put back into the environment.

KELLY: And he says people can go even farther.

SANJAYAN: You don’t need a pair of socks to get to you swiftly. It probably makes just as as much sense to get it to you efficiently.

KELLY: M. Sanjayan. He studied the environmental effects of super-fast shipping with the University of California.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Former Michigan State President Arraigned On Charges Tied To Larry Nassar Scandal

Former Michigan State University President Lou Anna Simon at Eaton County Court Monday.

Cheyna Roth/Michigan Radio


hide caption

toggle caption

Cheyna Roth/Michigan Radio

The former president of Michigan State University was arraigned Monday on felony and misdemeanor charges surrounding her involvement with the school’s handling of serial sexual predator, Larry Nassar. Attorneys for Lou Anna K. Simon say pleaded not guilty, and plans to fight the charges. Officials say Simon lied to or mislead law enforcement officers about her knowledge of details about a Title IX investigation by the school into Nassar.

Nassar is the former Michigan State University sports doctor who sexually assaulted his patients for decades, many of them young girls. Nassar is currently serving a de facto life sentence in prison.

Simon was president of Michigan State from 2005 until January of 2018. She stepped down amidst mounting criticism over how the university handled Nassar.

After the proceedings, Simon was sent to the county jail to be fingerprinted. Her attorney, Lee Silver said, “Dr. Simon is about as far from a criminal as anybody that I could think of and it’s ridiculous that she is being treated like a common criminal.”

Simon faces two felonies and two misdemeanor charges. The felonies each carry a maximum penalty of up to four years in prison and/or $5,000 in fines. The misdemeanors carry up to two years in prison each and/or fines.

For years, Simon has said she didn’t know about any reports against Nassar until 2016, the year the IndyStar published an investigation into USA Gymnastics’s handling of sexual abuse complaints, and Rachael Denhollander, one of the first survivors to publicly come forward against Nassar, filed a complaint with Michigan State University Police accusing Nassar of sexual assault when she was a teenager.

The charges Simon faces stem from a 2014 internal investigation into Nassar after Amanda Thomashow reported Nassar for sexual misconduct to the Michigan State Sports Medicine Clinic director.

According to court documents, Simon met with law enforcement officials in May during their ongoing investigation into who knew what and when at Michigan State about Nassar. Simon told investigators that she was aware there was a “sports medicine doc” who was the subject of a review in 2014, but she didn’t know the doctor or what the complaint was about until 2016.

Officials say they have written documents to show that Simon knew Nassar was the subject of a sexual assault complaint.

Lou Anna Simon, former president of Michigan State University, testifies during a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing in June.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

When asked about the evidence mentioned in court documents, Simon’s attorney Mayer Morganroth said, “Look we’re not going to get into the evidence because the evidence is false, ridiculous and would even be stupid for any of you to even consider it. You’ll find out.”

The former Michigan State University president is the third person charged during the state Attorney General’s Office’s investigation into the university’s handling of Nassar. Former dean of osteopathic medicine, and Nassar’s former boss, William Strampel is awaiting trial on various charges for failing to properly oversee Nassar and using his position as a dean to try and get sexual favors from students.

A former Michigan State coach also faces a criminal trial for allegedly lying to law enforcement. Two women testified during a court proceeding in September that when they were teens they told Kathie Klages that Nassar digitally penetrated them during treatment. But Klages told law enforcement – while it was conducting an investigation – that she didn’t recall those conversations.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

For Doctors Who Want To Provide Abortions, Employment Contracts Often Tie Their Hands

Dr. Kimberly Remski was told by a potential employer that she couldn’t provide abortions during her free time, something she felt called to do. “I realized it was something I really needed to do,” she says.

Kim Kovacik for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kim Kovacik for NPR

Doctors who are opposed to abortions don’t have to provide them. Since the 1970s, a series of federal rules have provided clinicians with “conscience protections” that help them keep their jobs if they don’t want to perform or assist with the procedure.

Religious hospitals are also protected. Catholic health care systems, for example, are protected if they choose not to provide abortions or sterilizations. Doctors who work for religious hospitals usually sign contracts that they’ll uphold religious values in their work.

But as the reach of Catholic-affiliated health care grows, these protections are starting to have consequences for doctors who do want to perform abortions — even as a side job.

Religious hospitals often prohibit their doctors from performing abortions — even if they do so at unaffiliated clinics, says Noel León, a lawyer with the National Women’s Law Center. León was hired about two years ago to help physicians who want to be abortion providers. They have little in the way of legal protection, she says.

“Institutions are using the institutional religious and moral beliefs to interfere with employees’ religious and moral beliefs,” León says.

This kind of legal argument, León says, may prevent doctors from providing care they feel called to offer. And since many clinics that provide abortions rely heavily on part-time staff, it may also prevent these clinics from finding the doctors they need to stay open.

Dr. Kimberly Remski sought help from León when she was job hunting. She is a primary care physician but had always been interested in women’s health. When she first set foot in a clinic that provides abortions, she realized it was her passion.

“A lot of the things we spend our time doing in training are monotonous, or you’re getting swamped in work,” she says. “I just remember leaving the clinic feeling like I was doing something really important.”

She interviewed for a job as a primary care doctor with IHA, one of the largest physician groups in Michigan, in 2017. She says she was clear about her desire to work one day a week in an independent clinic that provides abortions.

Part-time work is common for outpatient physicians, and Remski says the doctors she interviewed with were receptive.

“I was very upfront. I told that them that was a special interest of mine. I wanted to be able to pursue it,” she says.

She signed a contract, and started preparing for her move. Then she got a call that the offer was off.

Noel León oversees a National Women’s Law Center program that provides legal support to doctors who want to perform abortions.

Mary Mathis for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Mary Mathis for NPR

Remski learned that her potential employer was actually owned by a larger Catholic hospital network called Trinity Health, and it requires physicians to “provide services in a manner consistent with the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services,” according to her contract.

And, she says, she was shocked to learn Trinity Health would also have had a say over how she spent her free time. IHA officials told her that she couldn’t work on the side as an abortion provider if she took the job, Remski says.

Trinity Health had merged with IHA in 2010, part of a wave of mergers that has led to a net increase in Catholic ownership of hospitals. According to a 2016 report from MergerWatch, an organization that tracks hospital consolidation, 14.5 percent of acute care hospitals are Catholic-owned or affiliated. That number grew by 22 percent between 2001 and 2016, while the overall number of acute care hospitals dropped by 6 percent.

And as Catholic-affiliated health care expands, says León, doctors increasingly encounter morality clauses that prohibit them from performing abortions.

León says she has worked with at least 30 physicians and nurse practitioners from 20 different states who faced problems similar to Remski’s when they disclosed to their employers, or potential employers, that they planned to provide abortions.

“They’re being told, ‘We can’t provide the care we went into medicine to provide,’ ” León says. “We shouldn’t be putting providers in the position of caring for their patients or keeping their jobs.”

Representatives of IHA would not agree to a phone interview about Remski’s situation, but spokesperson Amy Middleton explained in an email that IHA “works hard with our physicians to enable them to pursue other positions.” But, she added, “outside work that interferes with a physician’s ability to serve patients or contradicts the organization’s practices could present a conflict of interest.”

IHA physicians follow Catholic health care guidelines, Middleton wrote, which requires that physicians “not promote or condone contraceptive practices.”

Dr. Barbara Golder, the editor of the Catholic Medical Association journal, Linacre Quarterly, says that language about morality is ubiquitous in contracts — and that it is reasonable that religious institutions might not want to be associated with abortion providers.

“The person is seen primarily as Dr. X of Catholic hospital Y, and then it turns out that Dr. X of Catholic hospital Y is doing abortions on the weekends,” Golder says. “There’s sort of a cognitive dissonance about that. It’s in opposition to what Catholic health care is.”

According to Lance Leider, a Florida attorney who has reviewed hundreds of physician contracts, it is “exceedingly common” for contracts, not just at religiously affiliated hospitals, to include language about the reasons an employer can fire a doctor, including but not limited to morality clauses.

“There’s always a laundry list of things the employer can terminate the contract for,” Leider says. “There’s usually a catch-all. Anything that calls into question the reputation of the practice.”

These clauses tend to be vague, León adds, which means employers can invoke them to prevent a wide range of activities, like political activity, controversial posts on social media or, in religious hospitals, physicians spending time at clinics that provide abortions.

The restrictions may have ramifications not only for physicians but for many clinics that provide abortions. Smaller clinics may be staffed almost entirely with part-time doctors, and when they can’t find enough, they’re sometimes left unable to meet the demand for services.

“We don’t have full-time doctors,” says Shelly Miller, the executive director of Scotsdale Women’s Center in Detroit, one of the clinics where Remski worked. “We really cannot afford to have a provider sit here all day and wait for patients to come in.”

Through her involvement with the National Abortion Federation, Miller often talks with other directors of small clinics that provide abortions and sometimes other women’s health services. She says that many of her counterparts say they exclusively hire part-time physicians because they simply don’t need somebody full time. If more physicians are prohibited from part-time abortion work, it may put some smaller clinics out of business, Miller worries.

It’s hard to know exactly how many of these clinics primarily use part-time staff, according to Rachel Jones, who studies the demographics of U.S. abortion services at the Guttmacher Institute, a family planning research organization. Ninety-five percent of abortions take place in clinics as opposed to hospitals, Jones notes, which may be more likely to utilize a team of part-time staff.

León doesn’t have data to show how common it is for physicians to be threatened with termination for providing abortions. She guesses that doctors will either give up on providing abortions — or, like Remski did, look for a different job that allows them to. León spends much of her time speaking to groups of doctors about how to approach contract negotiation if they want to provide abortions.

Ultimately, Remski says, she parted amicably from IHA, since “it felt like the wrong place for me.”

She ended up finding a job at an urgent-care clinic in Michigan, which allowed her to work part time at three separate clinics that provide abortions. She has since moved to Chicago, where she also splits her time between providing abortions and primary care.

“I was providing a service that was needed and necessary,” Remski says. “I realized it was something I really needed to do.”


Mara Gordon is a family physician in Washington, D.C., and a health and media fellow at NPR and Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)