April 19, 2018

No Image

Recent Tariffs On Canadian Newsprint Are Hurting U.S. Papers, Could Trigger Job Cuts

Recent tariffs on Canadian newsprint are hurting U.S. newspapers, potentially triggering further job cuts and consolidation. The duties of up to 32 percent come after a complaint from a single U.S. supplier, and are opposed by the domestic paper industry trade group.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

The actual paper that newspapers are printed on just got much more expensive. The Commerce Department has imposed steep tariffs on newsprint imported from Canada. On one hand, that’s boosting profits for the five remaining newsprint mills in the U.S. On the other hand, it’s pummelling the newspaper industry, which was already hurting. Frank Morris of member station KCUR has the story.

FRANK MORRIS, BYLINE: If you want to know the latest about the local hospital funding crisis, city hall or high school sports in rural Marysville, Kan., the Advocate has you covered.

SARAH KESSINGER: And this is our old press room back here. The press used to be here.

MORRIS: These days, publisher Sarah Kessinger contracts out for printing to save money. Income is down. And newsprint, the paper’s second largest operating expense, that is way up.

KESSINGER: It’s tough. It’s getting tougher especially with these newsprint tariffs coming in to the picture.

MORRIS: Over the last few months, the U.S. Commerce Department has slapped tariffs of up to 32 percent on Canadian newsprint, raising prices nationwide.

KESSINGER: If that trend continues, it will really make our profits disappear.

MORRIS: And it’s not just small papers. The Tampa Bay Times, for instance, is laying off around 50 people – responding to price hikes it claims will drive up its newsprint bill by $3 million a year. Al Cross, who heads the Institute for Rural Journalism at University of Kentucky, blames a single manufacturer.

AL CROSS: We have a complaint brought by one paper mill. It’s just crazy. The industry is being turned on its head by the manipulation of trade laws.

MORRIS: That one mill is NORPAC in Longview, Wash. And Craig Anneberg is the CEO.

CRAIG ANNEBERG: We strongly disagree with the notion that the industry requires low-priced, subsidized newsprint from Canada to sustain their business model.

MORRIS: Anneberg says canadian newsprint mills benefit from cheap hydroelectric power and state-owned forests. He claims that some sell below cost in the U.S. – taking over most of the market, depressing prices and forcing layoffs at his mill.

ANNEBERG: We have some of the largest, fastest, most technologically advanced paper machines in the world. And if we couldn’t compete – if we were having to shut down one of our machines, it looked like something wasn’t right.

MORRIS: The newsprint business has been rough. Mark Pitts with the American Forest and Paper Association says U.S. demand has cratered – falling about 80 percent in the past two decades, shuttering newsprint mills on both sides of the border.

MARK PITTS: I think it’s pretty clear that the predominant challenge out there isn’t about imports. It’s really about the declining demand.

MORRIS: Because more and more people read news on screens, not paper – and Pitts says the tariffs driving up newsprint prices will just accelerate that trend. Avis Little Eagle in the Standing Rock Indian Reservation agrees. She says tariffs are killing her paper, the Teton Times.

AVIS LITTLE EAGLE: It’s like a stranglehold. I just feel like you’re getting the life choked out of you. And it’s like little by little, more and more, the life of the newspaper is leaving.

MORRIS: Little Eagle says most of her customers don’t have internet access, so her printed paper is the only way they know what’s going on with local government. But two weeks ago, she reached an impasse.

LITTLE EAGLE: I was like, oh, my God, I can’t even print the paper this week. And so that’s pretty darn close.

MORRIS: The Commerce Department will decide whether to finalize or lift the tariffs on Canadian newsprint by late summer. Meantime, high newsprint prices will keep cutting into newspaper profits and undermining demand for the paper in newspaper. For NPR News, I’m Frank Morris.

(SOUNDBITE OF STEVE REICH’S “ELECTRIC COUNTERPOINT-FAST (MOVEMENT 3)”)

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Lance Armstrong To Pay U.S. Government $5 Million To Settle Fraud Claims

Lance Armstrong attends a 2017 NBA game in Atlanta.

Brett Davis/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Brett Davis/AP

Lance Armstrong has agreed to pay the federal government $5 million to settle fraud allegations that could have resulted in a nearly $100 million penalty. The U.S. Postal Service, which had sponsored the disgraced cyclist’s team, argued that Armstrong defrauded taxpayers by accepting millions from the government agency while using performance-enhancing drugs during competition.

“A competitor who intentionally uses illegal PEDs not only deceives fellow competitors and fans, but also sponsors, who help make sporting competitions possible,” Chad Reader, acting attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil division, said in a statement. “This settlement demonstrates that those who cheat the government will be held accountable.”

Armstrong, for his part, cast the agreement as a win, as well.

“I am glad to resolve this case and move forward with my life,” the 46-year-old former professional cyclist said in a statement released to NPR by his attorneys Thursday.

“I’m looking forward to devoting myself to the many great things in my life – my five kids, my wife, my podcast, several exciting writing and film projects, my work as a cancer survivor, and my passion for sports and competition,” he added. “There is a lot to look forward to.”

During his time cycling, Armstrong famously won a record seven consecutive Tour de France titles after recovering from testicular cancer, six of which he won as a member of the USPS-sponsored team.

But he was dogged by suspicions of doping throughout his career — including from his former teammate, Floyd Landis, who sued him in 2010 under the False Claims Act. As Reuters explains, the federal law “lets whistle-blowers pursue fraud cases on behalf of the government, and obtain rewards if successful.”

By 2012, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency found that Armstrong’s team “ran the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen” — but it was not until 2013 that he publicly admitted to cheating in a highly publicized interview with Oprah Winfrey. Ultimately, Armstrong was stripped of his Tour de France wins and banned for life from competition.

Not long after the Oprah interview, federal prosecutors joined Landis’ suit on behalf of the USPS. The plaintiffs accused Armstrong of financially benefiting from his repeated false statements and, in turn, harming the government agency that spent tens of millions sponsoring his team.

With Thursday’s settlement, however, the trial scheduled for May 7 ends before it could even get underway.

“The Postal Service has strongly supported the Department of Justice’s intervention and pursuit of this case, as it always has been our position that Lance Armstrong misled the Postal Service,” Thomas J. Marshall, USPS general counsel, said in a statement Thursday.

“This matter has now been resolved in a manner that imposes consequences for that wrongful action,” he added. “With this case, as in all other instances, the Postal Service vigorously defends our brand and our position as a trusted government institution.”

Landis, who has previously admitted to doping himself, will receive about $1.1 million as part of the settlement.

“I am particularly glad to have made peace with the Postal Service,” Armstrong said Thursday, noting that he has tried “to take full responsibility for my mistakes, and make amends wherever possible.”

“I rode my heart out for the Postal cycling team, and was always especially proud to wear the red, white and blue eagle on my chest when competing in the Tour de France,” he added. “Those memories are very real and mean a lot to me.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Can Triage Nurses Help Prevent 911 Overload?

Ogechi Ukachu, one of the registered nurses recently hired to help staff D.C.’s “Right Care Right Now” program, takes a training call at the city’s 911 call center.

Selena Simmons-Duffin/NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Selena Simmons-Duffin/NPR

Most people are familiar with some form of triage: When you go to an emergency room, you first sit down with a triage nurse who records your symptoms, takes your vital signs and assesses the urgency of your medical need.

As of Thursday, that’s happening over the phone for 911 callers in Washington, D.C., where triage nurses now sit alongside 911 dispatchers to help field calls.

Why are they there? D.C. has the highest rate of 911 calls in the U.S., and 1 in 4 of those calls is not an actual emergency — instead, it’s a twisted ankle, or a cough or a rash. The new triage program aims to improve those numbers by diverting needs that aren’t urgent to medical care that doesn’t involve an ambulance or an emergency room.

During a practice session, trainee Ogechi Ukachu, a registered nurse who has previously worked in an ER, clicks through a series of questions.

“Are you having any difficulty breathing or catching your breath?” she asks the training exercise’s pretend caller, who has complained of a sore throat. “Do you hear any weird sounds when you’re breathing — like whistling?” No, and no, the caller tells her.

It’s not an emergency, Ukachu determines, so instead of having the dispatcher send an ambulance, Ukachu gets to work finding the caller an appointment with a primary care provider who can see the patient that day.

On her computer, based on the information the caller has provided, Ukachu can see whether the patient already has a relationship with a doctor or clinic, or, if not, which community health clinic is closest. She can also see nearby clinics’ schedules for the day, so can make the patient an appointment.

The triage nurses can even coordinate free Lyft rides for people who are on Medicaid — including a stop at a pharmacy if needed.

Dr. Robert Holman, medical director of the D.C. Fire and EMS Department, got the idea for the program two years ago, when he realized the city’s system was getting backlogged with nonemergency calls.

Claire Harbage/NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

The “ride” part of the new triage service is critical, proponents say, because that’s the real emergency for many of the inappropriate calls to 911. Some callers simply have a hard time getting to the doctor in parts of the district where clinics can be miles away, and public transportation may not be readily accessible.

It has taken two years to pull off this plan. City health agencies, 22 primary care clinics, contractors and unions were all involved, under the coordination of the D.C. Fire and EMS Department.

“We’re very excited,” says Dr. Robert Holman, the department’s medical director, “and of course we all have butterflies in our stomach.”

Holman says he hit upon the idea soon after taking his job two years ago. He was looking at the city’s emergency call data and noticed that more than a hundred calls every day were for basic medical issues.

“I simply asked a question,” he says. ” ‘Wouldn’t this be simply better evaluated using a triage nurse?’ “

Other cities across the U.S., such as Louisville, Reno and the Dallas-Fort Worth area, have tried similar initiatives, Holman says. But D.C.’s program is distinct in its broad reach, and in the way it’s embedded within the 911 dispatch system.

The hope is that the triage line will save the city and insurers money — ambulances and ERs are the most expensive way to deliver care. Wait times for ambulances should go down, as should ER overcrowding.

And the patients will benefit, too, Holman believes. One example might be someone like a patient he encountered in his previous job at a walk-in health clinic; she’d come to the clinic looking for antibiotics for an infection.

“She mentioned that she’d had a bladder infection quite recently that was treated easily in an emergency department nearby,” he recalls.

Instead of just giving her the antibiotics, Holman also checked the patient’s vital signs and talked to her. Her blood glucose levels were really high. She was depressed and had stopped taking her diabetes medication, she told him.

“We could actually offer her treatment for her behavioral health problem as well as treatment of her diabetes,” he says, “in addition to [treating] her bladder infection.”

This is part of Holman’s message to city residents: Helping callers get a primary care visit, if they need one, is a service the triage nurse can provide.

“The mapping of our low-acuity callers exactly maps to where our community health centers are in Washington,” he says.

However, D.C. has a somewhat rocky history when it comes to its emergency services. In a few high-profile cases in the past, patients have died while waiting for emergency care. Some 911 callers who are advised their case isn’t an emergency may feel they’re being denied something crucial.

To address these fears in advance, Holman and his colleagues have crisscrossed the district, going to community meetings and neighborhood associations talking to residents.

Lois Wiley, a longtime resident of the LeDroit Park neighborhood, is skeptical of the triage plan and lets Holman know that at a public meeting.

“Suppose,” she says, “I say I don’t want to talk to the nurse, I want to go to the hospital?”

Holman tells her the city’s response will be based on the severity of the problem. “If you call with a sore throat,” he says, “we are not taking you to the emergency department.”

“Oh, yes you are,” Wiley says under her breath.

In the face of that sort of skepticism, Washington officials are prepared to carefully monitor how well the pilot project is working.

According to the city’s plan, every caller who gets sent to a clinic instead of the ER will be surveyed the next day about their experience. And data analysts will be checking ambulance response time, ER use, primary care use and 911 call volume.

Other cities grappling with the same difficult issues will be closely watching, too.

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with local member stations and Kaiser Health News.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)