February 28, 2018

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 2018 Oscar Nominee Montage, Imagining Janelle Monae as Batgirl and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Dream Casting of the Day:

Who should play Batgirl in DC’s planned movie? Possible writer Roxane Gay suggested Janelle Monae, so comic book artist Rachael Stott shows us what that could look like (via One Perfect Shot):

All it took was @rgay to mention Janelle Monae in the same tweet thread as Batgirl and this happened pic.twitter.com/ilB5CaMQ7R

— Rachael Stott (Phone Broken) (@RachaelAtWork) February 27, 2018

Supercut of the Day:

Get ready for this Sunday’s Academy Awards with a montage of 2018 Oscar nominees edited by Casper Christensen:

[embedded content]

Oscars Discussion of the Day:

Speaking of the Oscars, here’s a funny animated video of Star Wars: The Last Jedi characters discussing the nominees:

[embedded content]

Character Parody of the Day:

Speaking of Oscar-nominated movies, can you imagine what it’s like to watch movies if you’re Daniel Day-Lewis’s character from Phantom Thread? Slate shows us in case you can’t:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Mike Figgis, who turns 70 today, directs Nicolas Cage’s Oscar-winning performance and Elizabeth Shue’s Oscar-nominated performance on the set of Leaving Las Vegas in 1994:

Actor in the Spotlight:

Speaking of people in Leaving Las Vegas, the latest edition of No Small Parts focuses on the career of Lady Bird Oscar nominee Laurie Metcalf:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Stanley Kubrick isn’t known as a comedic director, but this Fandor video essay by Philip Brubaker highlights the filmmaker’s dark humor:

[embedded content]

Screenwriting Lesson of the Day:

The latest edition of Lessons from the Screenplay focuses on Get Out and how it offers a new perspective in horror:

[embedded content]

Song Cover of the Day:

Watch fans cover the Oscar-nominated song “Remember Me” from Coco using various forms of cocoa as percussion:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 65th anniversary of the release of Alfred Hitchcock’s I Confess. Watch the original trailer for the classic crime drama below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Walmart Announces It Will No Longer Sell Guns, Ammunition To Anyone Under 21

Walmart, the largest retailer in the U.S., announced it will stop selling guns and ammunition to anyone under 21. The decision comes on the same day that Dick’s Sporting Goods said it would stop selling military-style semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines, as well as guns to anyone under 21.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Since the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida two weeks ago, a number of companies have taken a position in the debate over guns. Many severed ties with the National Rifle Association.

AILSA CHANG, HOST:

Today Walmart said it would raise the age to buy guns and ammunition to 21. That decision came the same day Dick’s Sporting Goods announced it’s no longer selling assault-style rifles like the one used in the high school shooting at any of its stores. That includes all Dick’s stores and Field & Stream stores. It’s not selling high-capacity magazines either, and it’s also setting a minimum age of 21 to buy other firearms.

SHAPIRO: CEO Ed Stack went on ABC’s “Good Morning America” to explain why.

(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, “GOOD MORNING AMERICA”)

ED STACK: We’re staunch supporters of the Second Amendment. I’m a gun owner myself. But we’ve just decided that based on what’s happened and with these guns, we don’t want to be a part of this story. And we’ve eliminated these guns permanently.

SHAPIRO: Some customers today cheered the move. We caught up with Christina Reveir in Boise, Idaho.

CHRISTINA REVEIR: You know, I grew up around guns, and my family has guns. But I definitely don’t think that anyone needs an assault rifle.

CHANG: Others said the company’s announcement wouldn’t stop violent crime. Here’s Bruce Dickinson in Elmira, N.Y.

BRUCE DICKINSON: You can put down on paper anything you want. Somebody wants to get a gun, they’re going to get a gun. If they’re out there, they can find it. They can get it.

SHAPIRO: And other Dick’s customers shrugged. Todd Jameson of Macon, Ga., says he has lots of guns, including multiple assault-style rifles. But…

TODD JAMESON: It’s their opinion. It’s their store. If they want to carry them, great. If not, that’s up to them.

CHANG: Joining us now to talk about these developments today is NPR’s Uri Berliner. Hey, Uri.

URI BERLINER, BYLINE: Hi, Ailsa.

CHANG: So I want to start with this move by Walmart. Do you think Dick’s Sporting Goods’ announcement this morning pressured Walmart to act the very same day?

BERLINER: Well, it’s certainly notable that they did it on the same day. They could have done this at any other time.

CHANG: Sure.

BERLINER: But they did it today right after this very dramatic announcement by Dick’s Sporting Goods this morning.

CHANG: But the news about Walmart is in a way a bigger deal because it has the power to move the market in a way that Dick’s does not, right?

BERLINER: Yeah. I mean, Walmart – whenever Walmart does something, people pay attention. It’s the biggest retailer in America. Walmart has hundreds and hundreds of stores. People shop in Walmart every day. When Walmart speaks, people pay attention. And it’s notable.

CHANG: We should note that three years ago, Walmart had already ended its sales of modern sporting rifles, including the AR-15. Why was that? Why did it do that three years ago?

BERLINER: Well, they said they did it because of softening demand and that they were going to sell more hunting rifles and those kinds of things. But Walmart was also under pressure from a shareholder to stop selling those kinds of assault-style rifles.

CHANG: All right, I want to get to Dick’s Sporting Goods’ announcement, too. After Sandy Hook, Dick’s removed all assault-style rifles from its main stores, but they just ended up selling those guns at Field & Stream stores, which they own. Today, however, Ed Stack, the CEO of Dick’s – he said that the changes that they are making today are going to be across the company and permanent. Why do you think the Parkland shooting was the tipping point and not Sandy Hook?

BERLINER: Well, he directly said that it was about the kids and their response to this horrific violence and their response to gun violence in general. You know, what he said – when we take a look at those kids and the parents and the heroes in the school, what they did, our view was if the kids can be brave enough to organize like this, we can be brave enough to take these out of here. He also said about the kids, we heard you. The nation has heard you.

CHANG: Stack had also said this morning that Dick’s is ready for a backlash. I mean, do you think they should be expecting a backlash from the gun rights side?

BERLINER: That’s likely. Today, though, if you were – they were looking for an investor backlash, they didn’t get it. Dick’s stock price closed up a bit today. So it wasn’t like investors were saying, this company is in a lot of trouble; were selling. That didn’t happen.

CHANG: If that’s the case – that Dick’s maybe doesn’t ultimately see a huge financial loss because of the decision today, are these decisions by both Walmart and by Dick’s business-driven decisions, meaning what’s good politically is ultimately fine for business?

BERLINER: It’s hard to say really what the primary motivation is, but corporate CEOs don’t do things that materially harm their company financially. They just don’t do that. We don’t know exactly how much of Dick’s revenues, its sales come from the sales of firearms. It’s certainly less than half – significantly less than half and assault-style rifles much less than that. So those sales probably aren’t going to have a big impact on the overall bottom line of the company. The question is, is there going to be a backlash from customers, from customers who are NRA members? That’s the key thing.

CHANG: All right, that’s NPR’s Uri Berliner. Thank you, Uri.

BERLINER: Thank you, Ailsa.

CHANG: And special thanks to member station WSKG, Boise State Public Radio and Georgia Public Broadcasting for contributing to this report.

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

CEO Of U.S. Olympic Committee Resigns Citing Health Concerns Amid Nassar Fallout

Scott Blackmun, in 2007. He announced Wednesday that he is stepping down as CEO of the U.S. Olympic Committee. On the same day, the USOC announced steps it is taking to protect abuse victims.

Lee Jin-man/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Lee Jin-man/AP

Under growing pressure to quit, Scott Blackmun, CEO of the United States Olympic Committee, resigned “due to ongoing health issues resulting from prostate cancer,” according to a USOC statement on Wednesday.

Board member Susanne Lyons will step in as the acting CEO until a permanent replacement is named.

The news came at the same time the committee announced steps “designed to protect athletes from abuse and respond quickly and effectively when issues surface.”

Among the reforms and initiatives the USOC said it is implementing are creating an advisory group that will include abuse survivors to safeguard against future abuse in “the Olympic community,” providing more funding to speed up the resolution of cases, and improving support and counseling “for gymnasts impacted by Nassar’s crimes.”

The USOC has been engulfed by the scandal surrounding Larry Nassar, onetime USA Gymnastics doctor, convicted of sexually assaulting minors. Scores of athletes who were in his care have accused him of abuse going back decades. He has been sentenced to hundreds of years in prison.

Two U.S. senators called for Blackmun’s resignation earlier this month, citing a Wall Street Journal report that found he and other USOC officials were aware of abuse allegations against Nassar for months before acting on them.

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, questioned Blackmun’s leadership, citing an open letter he wrote in January in which he pledged to uncover how the abuse could have gone on for so long and “who knew what and when.” But the senators said Blackmun failed “to admit his own supposed direct knowledge of allegations that were brought to his attention in July 2015.”

Several former Olympic athletes and advocates also called on Blackmun to step down.

In courtrooms, dozens of wrenching victim impact statements described Nassar as abusing athletes for years under the guise of legitimate medical treatment with seeming impunity.

Rachael Denhollander, a lawyer and one of Nassar’s first accusers, said after a sentencing earlier this month, that victims “wouldn’t be here had the adults and authorities done what they should have done 20 years ago,” according to The Associated Press.

Denhollander added that victims are turning their attention “with even greater force to the institutional dynamics that led to the greatest sexual assault scandal in history.”

Late last month, the entire board of USA Gymnastics announced they will resign.

USOC Chairman Larry Probst said new leadership is needed “so that we can immediately address the urgent initiatives ahead of us. … The USOC is at a critical point in its history.”

In a statement, Blackmun, who has been USOC CEO since 2010, did not mention the Nassar scandal, instead saying his role “has not only been immensely rewarding, it has been an honor and the highlight of my professional life,” He added, “I am proud of what we have achieved as a team and am confident that Susanne will help the USOC continue to embody the Olympic spirit and champion Team USA athletes during this transition.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Rethinking Rural Health Solutions To Save Patients And Communities

Getting health care to rural areas may involve tough decisions about the role of hospitals.

hmproudlove/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

hmproudlove/Getty Images

Heidi Schultz grew up traveling from one end of South Dakota to the other, tagging along as her sister saw doctors and specialists in the “big cities” to treat her diabetes.

Schultz thought she knew rural America well when she took a position as a rural health care program officer for the Helmsley Charitable Trust in Wyoming and Montana.

But even she has been surprised by how she can drive hours on country highways seeing few cars and just “a handful of gravel driveways going somewhere you can’t see.”

“It’s almost scary,” Schultz says. “You’re thinking, ‘If something happened to me here on this road now, how long would it take for someone to get to me? An ambulance? And where would they take me for care?’ “

Now part of her job is to help organizations apply for grants to provide care in rural areas. She understands that people living in these places must come up with creative solutions to deal with their health care needs — whether it’s getting help in an emergency, receiving treatment for ongoing illnesses or softening the natural consequences of old age.

It’s a quickly changing landscape as more rural hospitals close, and some health policy analysts say it’s time communities made some hard decisions — starting with completely changing the health care structure in small towns.

For example, says a recent report by the Bipartisan Policy Center, instead of making sure each rural resident can easily get to a full-service hospital, some communities should consider what kind of primary care and more specialized care they could offer at a facility instead — short of having a full-service hospital.

Hospitals tend to be cornerstone institutions in rural communities. They provide jobs and contribute to a town’s economy. For many citizens in small-town America, losing the local hospital would threaten the livelihood of the town and its people, says Patrick Roche, chief operating officer at Faith Regional Health Services based in Norfolk, Neb.

“There are two things they don’t want to lose. The first one is their school, the second one is their hospital,” says Roche.

But there are big challenges to keeping these hospitals open. They cost money and it’s difficult to find a qualified workforce.

There are other concerns, including limited funding, regulatory restrictions, problems with transportation, broadband internet accessibility and the unique characteristics of the population, according to Dr. Anand Parekh, chief medical advisor with the Bipartisan Policy Center and one of the report’s authors.

“Rural America,” Parekh says, “is a little bit older, a little bit sicker, a little bit poorer.”

In 2016, the Census Bureau reported that 19.3 percent of the U.S. population lived in rural areas, which cover 97 percent of the country. Up to this point, the medical needs of that group have been addressed by a system that has medical facilities, many of which do receive some federal support, including about 1,300 small hospitals known as critical access hospitals.

A hospital is designated as critical access by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services if has 25 beds or fewer, is more than 35 miles from another hospital and provides 24-hour emergency services.

The National Rural Health Association says 673 rural hospitals are at risk to close, and 210 of those are at “extreme risk”— 60 rural hospitals closed between 2010 and February 2016.

One of the main reasons for the significant rural hospital closures is that the average number of in-patients is low, says Schultz.

“Running a full hospital is very expensive — the overhead, 24/7 staffing, the facilities,” she says. “Think of a 25-bed hospital, and you’re only using four of your beds and how expensive that is.”

Residents of Tilden, Neb. — a town of less than 1,000 — know what happens when the town hospital can’t make ends meet. They lost their critical access hospital in 2014 and had to find a different solution for their medical care.

Roche explains that Faith Regional Health Services in Norfolk, just 22 miles away from Tilden, worked out an agreement to lease the hospital and clinic from the little town; Faith Regional then provided the medical operations—staffing, providers and equipment.

“The operations are, in effect, owned by Faith Regional and are operated just like any other clinic that is owned and operated by our system,” Roche says. But the facility in Tilden is no longer a full hospital.

“There’s been a fear in the air and you read a lot, and you hear a lot about hospitals closing,” says Schultz, who travels often to rural communities. “And that’s rightfully so. But if you look at the communities that are losing their hospitals, you need to look at, ‘What do they still have?’ “

The Bipartisan Policy Center and Helmsley Charitable Trust partnered to propose a possible solution for communities struggling to keep facilities afloat and provide quality care miles away from city and suburban hospitals and clinics.

Their January 2018 report, which surveyed health care professionals in seven states in the upper Midwest, says that the whole rural health care system needs to be addressed. Each community should determine the best health care structure, the report suggests, not the other way around. And that difficult analysis may lead to closing a small town hospital.

Darrold Bertsch, chief executive officer of Sakakawea Medical Center in Hazen, N.D., says he agrees with the idea of catering health care facilities to the population — whether it’s with an outpatient clinic, urgent care center, a hospital or something else.

“If communities had a little bit more flexibility,” he says, “then they could adapt a health care delivery system in their area that is more relevant to the needs that they have, rather than trying to make a hospital fit in a community where it might not be able to be supported anymore.”

The critical access hospital in Cody, Wyo., has stayed open — partially because of this idea of flexibility, says Jeanine Brus, who works as the laboratory director for the hospital.

Cody sits outside the eastern edge of Yellowstone National Park and is a town of about 10,000 people. Cody Regional Health, which includes the hospital and other health care facilities, such as a surgical center, a cancer center and a dialysis center, serves the town and the farms and ranches in a 200-mile radius, as well as tourists from the park.

Brus says that the key to adapting has been collaboration between the different facilities. And that’s been good for the health care workers, as well as the community, she says.

Bertsch from the North Dakota hospital says federal regulations and the way hospitals are reimbursed mean there’s no one-size-fits-all fix for every community.

Still, Parekh underscores his hope for the possibilities that can come when communities are open to new kinds of solutions.

“You know, you don’t have to close your hospital,” he says. “You can transform the hospital to meet your community needs, improve health and still continue to improve your local economy. Rural America can thrive as health care transforms.”

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with Kaiser Health News.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)