'You Don't Hold Back': Mikaela Shiffrin Wins Gold At 2018 Winter Olympics

U.S. skier Mikaela Shiffrin won her second career gold medal and her first of the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics in the women’s giant slalom at the Yongpyong Alpine Center in South Korea.
Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images
Mikaela Shiffrin overcame both delays and some of the best skiers in the world to claim her first gold medal at the 2018 Winter Olympics, winning the giant slalom. The weather finally cooperated, with sunny, clear skies over the Yongpyong Alpine Center in Pyeongchang.
Norway’s Ragnhild Mowinckel won silver, 0.39 behind Shiffrin’s combined time of 2:20.02.
It was a hard-won medal, on a day where 20 racers crashed out of the course. Shiffrin set herself up for a podium finish by turning in a time of 1:10.82 on her first run of the day, taking second place just 0.2 seconds behind Italy’s Manuela Moelgg. Another Italian racer, Federica Brignone, trailed Shiffrin by 0.09 seconds.
“The conditions are great, the weather is beautiful, and it’s a pleasure to be skiing today,” Shiffrin told reporters after her first run.
.@MikaelaShiffrin‘s dad’s reaction to her gold medal is everything. ???? pic.twitter.com/NOFetK7SjX
— U.S. Ski & Snowboard Team (@usskiteam) February 15, 2018
Shiffrin continued:
“But I also feel like I can go a little bit harder and you know, there’s nothing to hold back for in the second run. The nice thing about the Olympics is, you don’t hold back. And I’m excited to see what I can do.”
Shiffrin gave this rundown of the course, part of which was somewhat obscured by shadows from nearby trees:
“The top is kind of like a false flat. You just, you can push into it so hard it feels like, perfect. And then on the middle, it got a little bit more chattery. There’s some sort of micro-terrain that, especially when it’s a little darker, you can’t see it that well. It seems like it’s been tossing everybody around a little bit more.”
On her first run, Shiffrin had sped through the first half of the course, but she lost a little time on the bottom portion; in her second run, she started slightly slower than some of the other skiers — but she blazed through the rest of the course, turning in a time of 1:09.20 to put her atop the leader board. Only a handful of skiers were faster than Shiffrin in their second runs; none of them had top-five times in their first attempts.
“I don’t know when it was, at some point today after the first run I thought, like, ‘I can really win this’. I just tried to hang on to that feeling and then focus on my skiing a bit,” Shiffrin said, in remarks transcribed by the Olympics’ news service.
Like Shiffrin, Brignone went down the hill in under 1:10.00 on her second run – and Brignone’s combined time kept her in third place for a bronze medal. Her fellow Italian Moelgg lost her No. 1 spot, and a place on the podium, after a slow second run. She finished eighth.
After Shiffrin set the bar, her Olympic race turned into a waiting game, and she settled in at the scoring area at the bottom of the course to see if any other skier could beat her time.
As racers tried to carve tenths of a second out of the course, the number of DNF — did not finish — statistics piled up. They included two women who might have challenged Shiffrin: Austria’s Stephanie Brunner and Switzerland’s Lara Gut. France’s Tessa Worley, another contender, was undone by a slow first run that left her with too much time to recover.
The course in Pyeongchang comprised 49 turning gates and a vertical drop of 400 meters (1,312 feet). The race began at an altitude of 1365 meters (4,478 feet).
At the Sochi Games of 2014, Shiffrin finished in fifth place in the giant slalom. She won gold in the slalom – an event in which she’ll race tomorrow (Friday morning in Korea, and Thursday night in the continental U.S.).
Today in Movie Culture: The Best Couples and Kisses in Movies, Liam Neeson as Cupid and More
Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:
Supercut of the Day:
In honor of Valentine’s Day, One Perfect Shot celebrates the best couples in the movies:
Whether you’re paired up or alone, we wish you a Happy #ValentinesDay. We’re celebrating our favorite cinematic couples. Which is yours? pic.twitter.com/BZ2L1obV6S
— One Perfect Shot (@OnePerfectShot) February 14, 2018
Movie Ranking of the Day:
Meanwhile, ScreenCrush celebrates the best kisses in the movies the below supercut and a ranked list on their site.
[embedded content]
Audition of the Day:
Watch Liam Neeson audition for the part of Cupid for a fake movie on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert:
[embedded content]
Film History of the Day:
Ahead of this year’s Oscars, Burger Fiction showcases every Academy Award winner for Best Cinematography:
[embedded content]
Vintage Image of the Day:
John Barrymore, whose birth certificate shows he was born on this day (though his family claimed February 15th), poses with one of his Valentines, third wife and co-star Dolores Costello, and some monkeys on the set of The Sea Beast in 1925:
Filmmaker in Focus:
Studio Binder explores the work of Akira Kurosawa and how the filmmaker mastered the color palette:
[embedded content]
Movie Comparison of the Day:
Dimitreze places clips from The Iron Lady side by side with the actual footage of Margaret Thatcher:
[embedded content]
Video Essay of the Day:
In the latest video essay from Likes Stories of Old, the philosophy of Cloud Atlas is explored through the lens of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:
[embedded content]
Cosplay of the Day:
Spider-Man 3 isn’t very good, but Spider-Man 3 cosplay is pretty awesome:
AGGHHH!! IT’S TOBEY MAGUIRE! RUN!
Haha, props to Glasgow Spidey for this awesome cosplay. Best Sam Raimi Spider-Man look I’ve ever seen. pic.twitter.com/4WQ81wRewo
— Becky Morrison (@SpiderBecks) February 14, 2018
Classic Trailer of the Day:
Today is the 10th anniversary of the release of Definitely, Maybe. Watch the original trailer for the romance classic below.
[embedded content]
and
Stimulus Response
Jared Bernstein has a dilemma. He’s a liberal economist, and he’s been saying for years that the U.S. needs stimulus — some combination of higher spending and lower taxes — to drive up wages for workers.
Congress and the President recently passed bills to raise spending and cut taxes.
These weren’t sold as stimulus packages. They are not Jared Bernstein’s dream come true. But they are going to mean lower taxes and higher spending.
Today on the show: How is a liberal economist supposed to feel about these Republican bills that are — sort of — the thing he’s been saying we need?
Music: Drop Electric and Toccata and Fugue. Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.
Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts, PocketCasts and NPR One.
Medical Records May Finally Be Coming To Your Apple Smartphone

Richard Klein switched doctors last year. The new doctor put him on a new blood pressure drug.
But it didn’t help.
The failure was entirely predictable.
Klein, an associate professor at Florida International University in Miami, realized later that he had tried the same medicine unsuccessfully a few years before, but he hadn’t remembered that fact during the appointment.
It was an understandable mistake for Klein and his doctor.
An upcoming iOS update will allow Apple users to see their health records on their cellphones.
Apple
hide caption
toggle caption
Apple
Klein’s prescription history was hidden somewhere in the hundreds of pages of medical records his new doctor had to go through.
“If I had been able to go into an app sitting in his office and look through my prescription history, I would have known that, yeah, we tried that a couple years back and it didn’t work well,” he says.
A feature like that will soon be available for some patients with iPhones.
In the upcoming release of Apple’s iOS operating system for iPhones this spring, the Health app will include health records, so patients can take information about their immunizations, medications, lab results and more with them.
The feature will first be available to patients of medical providers who partnered with Apple, including Johns Hopkins Medicine; OhioHealth; Ochsner Health System in Jefferson Parish, La.; and Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles. It won’t cost those patients anything to use this feature, assuming they’re already iPhone users.
Apple’s announcement says more medical facilities will offer this feature in the coming months.
Some doctors hail it as a big shift away from patients having to handle a big pile of paper records every time they see a new doctor. But Google offered a similar service before and it failed. The search giant shut it down in 2012.
Can Apple succeed where Google didn’t?
Dr. Jonathan Slotkin says yes; he is a medical director handling digital patient engagement at Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, one of Apple’s partners. Unlike even a few years ago, a lot more people now use smartphones and the phones are more secure. There’s now also a technical standard for transferring electronic medical records.
“Even if I get care at three different places and maybe they use three different electronic systems, now in one place that I possess in an encrypted way, I have all of that information at my fingertips,” he says.
He adds this will make transferring information easier for patients who have to move, or go to a specialist.
The health records feature could also change doctors’ habits in some ways, says Dr. Isaac Kohane, chair of the department of biomedical informatics at Harvard Medical School and a professor of pediatrics.
“For some reason, and I say this as a physician, most physicians, if they don’t actually know how a test was done, somehow imagine it was done wrongly, and therefore repeat a test, not only at a cost but at some pain to the patient,” Kohane says. “If you have a reliable authoritative description of the test and its results, that uncertainty goes away and that excuse to repeat tests goes away as well.”

Checking your prescription history or past medical tests should be easier soon if you have an iPhone.
Apple
hide caption
toggle caption
Apple
Kohane called Apple’s new feature a “tectonic shift” in a commentary for member station WBUR’s CommonHealth.
But Apple will have to address one big problem that Google had with Google Health, a similar health records service: It was popular with only a niche audience — tech-savvy patients and their caregivers, and fitness enthusiasts. The product didn’t attract a wide base of users.
This time will be different, says Dr. Ida Sim, a co-director of biomedical informatics at the University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. Why? Because unlike with Google Health, patients no longer have to do the heavy lifting of entering or scanning their own data. Also, the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 pushed federal agencies and providers to use electronic health records, and now there is a data standard for personal health records, which wasn’t the case in 2011.
However, she writes in an email that wider adoption will still be an issue.
“We’ll probably see huge numbers of people getting their initial Health Records populated. The issue is, then what?… The value will come from third party apps that use Health Records to provide meaningful value to patients, and until this value is demonstrated, I think Health Records uptake will be large but retention and continued engagement of patients will be challenging.”
Alan Yu reports forThe Pulse, WHYY’s health and science show.