New England Patriots To Face Philadelphia Eagles At Super Bowl
For Federal Employees On Furlough During Shutdown, An Uncertain Future
When the government shut down, furloughed workers began preparing for an uncertain future. NPR’s Michel Martin talks with Pam Gilbertz, a furloughed employee at the CDC, about her plans.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Now that we’ve talked about the overall impact of a government shutdown, let’s talk with one of the tens of thousands of federal workers who may or may not be going to work tomorrow morning. Pam Gilbertz works as a health communications specialist for the Centers for Disease Control. We reached her in Atlanta. Ms. Gilbertz, thanks so much for speaking with us.
PAM GILBERTZ: You’re welcome. Thank you for having me.
MARTIN: What did your supervisors tell you on Friday about whether you will be at work on Monday?
GILBERTZ: My supervisor did not tell me anything on Friday because my supervisor had not received any information either. In fact, I received information before she did because I got that information in my role as a union official.
MARTIN: And what did you find out or what are they saying?
GILBERTZ: We haven’t received anything. I know in the past – the shutdown that occurred in 2013 – we all had some limited information but at least something from our headquarters, the Department of Health and Human Services, several days at least in advance.
MARTIN: Is it clear who in your agency has to work and who doesn’t?
GILBERTZ: It is not clear to most of us. All we know is that each individual employee got a letter by email from HHS. I haven’t even seen my letter yet because I have not logged into CDC email since Friday afternoon, but I have been told that the emails went out overnight, and those emails from HHS told each individual employee how they had been categorized. I’m assuming that I will be categorized the same way that I was categorized in 2013 because I’m doing the same job that I was doing then, and my position as a health communication specialist is categorized as non-essential because it’s not one of those that fall into the category, you know, of national security or so forth.
MARTIN: And you’re saying you worked for the government in 2013. Do you remember that – like, what that was like while the shutdown was going on? Can you just talk a little bit about, you know, what was it like? What did you do?
GILBERTZ: It’s very sad. I know that most employees who have contacted me are very upset. Many people live paycheck to paycheck, and it will be a real struggle for them to pay bills and be able to take care of themselves and their families without pay. You know, employees want to work. I think some people in the public may have the perception that federal employees don’t care that much about the work that we do, but it’s actually the opposite.
You know, I have found federal employees are the most dedicated bunch of people that I have ever worked with, particularly at the CDC. We take what we do very seriously. We take an oath of office when we become federal employees that is very similar to the oath of office that many of us took when we joined the military, including me, and many federal employees are military veterans. So, you know, it’s very stressing to us when we are not allowed to do that work and not allowed to provide the services that we’ve been trained to provide and we want to provide to the public.
MARTIN: That’s Pam Gilbertz. She’s an employee of the Centers for Disease Control. She believes she will be furloughed as of Monday if the government shutdown continues. We reached her in Atlanta. Thanks so much for speaking with us.
GILBERTZ: You’re welcome. Thank you.
MARTIN: And we’d like you to know that we reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services to ask how they spoke to their employees about the shutdown. We haven’t heard back.
Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
SAG Awards 2018: Actors Honor Actors, With Frances McDormand, Gary Oldman and 'Three Billboards' Leading the Way
Kristen Bell hosted the 24th annual Screen Actors Guild awards ceremony on Sunday evening; it’s the only televised awards show that exclusively honors performers. Bell is the first-ever host for the show, which is filled with effusive praise and a genial atmosphere. Bell began things with a lightly comic introduction, which you can watch below.
[embedded content]
Here are the awards presented for motion picture acting, along with the acceptance speeches.
Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture: Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri. Frances McDormand accepted the award on behalf of her cast members, 11 in all.
[embedded content]
Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Lead Role: Frances McDormand, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
[embedded content]
Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Lead Role: Gary Oldman, Darkest Hour
[embedded content]
Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role: Allison Janney, I, Tonya
[embedded content]
Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role: Sam Rockwell, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
[embedded content]
Life Achievement Award: Morgan Freeman
In her introductory comments, Rita Moreno recalled that Morgan Freeman presented her with the Life Achievement Award five years ago and clearly she was delighted to present him with the same honor, recounting their past shared history together on the PBS show Sesame Street. Freeman, as might be expected, was quite gracious in his speech.
[embedded content]
Cancer Patients Get Little Guidance From Doctors On Using Medical Marijuana
Like most patients, Murphy’s first step was to ask her oncologist. Murphy said she loved her doctor and care team at Mount Auburn Hospital in Cambridge, but they had no advice to offer on medical marijuana.
“They said ‘yes, you can look into it,’ ” she said. “But I felt sad because you’re so lost and you’re so sick and this is so not your area of expertise, that it was very upsetting to me to not get direction one way or the other.”
Only about 1 percent of Massachusetts’ 25,000 doctors are registered with the state and allowed to legally prescribe marijuana. And only a fraction of those know much about cancer care.
Last June, the Massachusetts Medical Society approved a new online curriculum for medical marijuana. Six months later, only 27 medical professionals have taken the section on cancer care and cannabis. Both the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center said they had no experts on staff to speak with us for this report.
Murphy eventually found her way to Dr. Jordan Tishler, who runs medical cannabis clinics in Cambridge and Brookline, called inhaleMD.
Tishler, a former emergency room physician and music producer, said he treats cannabis like any other therapy, meeting with new patients for an extended conversation and follow-ups. But some cannabis prescribers, he said, just want to sign the state paperwork and move on.
“By and large, physicians are simply saying, ‘yes, you can have it,’ and then stopping the conversation there,” he said.
Tischler explained that medical centers — particularly those that take federal funding — are in a tight spot because federal law still classifies cannabis as an illegal drug, despite its legalization for medical purposes, at a minimum, in 30 states and the District of Columbia.
“Most of those institutions are prohibited and/or afraid of the prohibitions from the federal government, so have opted not to pursue this within their domain,” Tischler said. He set up his private clinic so he could operate outside of those systems, though he said he receives referrals from all the major hospitals.
In early January, Attorney General Jeff Sessions told the nation’s U.S. attorneys to resume aggressively pursuing marijuana growers and distributors, even in states where marijuana has been legalized. It’s not clear yet what that will mean for Massachusetts’ medical marijuana system, but a few days later, Massachusetts U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling said he cannot and will not rule out prosecuting state-sanctioned marijuana businesses.
As it currently stands, authorized doctors like Tishler have to fill out an online form with the state, which the patient then submits with a $50 check to request a license. Tishler said the process used to take several weeks, but now the state usually issues a medical card within three or four days of receiving a request.
Then, the patient has to take that license to one of the state-approved medical marijuana dispensaries, which offer a wide array of products containing cannabis.
New England Treatment Access in Brookline, Mass., is located in a former branch of Brookline Bank.
Jesse Costa/WBUR
hide caption
toggle caption
Jesse Costa/WBUR
New England Treatment Access, or NETA, whose Brookline dispensary is housed in an old bank building, sells 130 products. Garden Remedies, whose dispensary is in Newton about a block from a Whole Foods, sells 50 items, including bath bombs, lip balm and marijuana-infused honey they make themselves in their cultivation facility.
Murphy said she would have been overwhelmed by those choices if she hadn’t had a doctor like Tishler advising her on what to take. Tishler said he tells cancer patients, for example, that they should avoid using novelty items like bath bombs and creams. They may be fun, but they won’t help with nausea or pain, he says.
Murphy didn’t like the idea of edibles. She had young children at home and was anxious they might find a brownie too tempting to pass up.
Tishler warned his patients against getting advice on care either from the Internet — which he said is loaded with misinformation — or from the counter folks at the dispensaries, who are trained in their products but are not legally allowed to give out medical advice.
“They’re doing the best they can, but fundamentally, they’re salespeople,” he said. “Their level of training, I often say, is about the level of a Starbucks barista. So, I tell patients, ‘look, if you wouldn’t ask your coffee guy about your health, probably you shouldn’t ask these guys, either.’ “
Dispensing Experimental Wisdom
Dr. Karen Munkacy, president and CEO of Garden Remedies, said her staff generally recommends that someone with nausea use a vape pen, to get a quick effect from the cannabis, and then, if they need something longer-lasting, take an edible.
“Inhalation medical marijuana works within a few minutes, and so, now their nausea and vomiting is under control,” she said. “If they want to get a good night’s sleep they’re going to need to get something that they ingest because it’s going to last longer. They won’t wake up vomiting in the middle of the night.”
Munkacy started her company after her own bout with chemo-induced nausea. She was treated for breast cancer a decade ago in New Jersey, where medical marijuana was illegal.
“It was months of feeling a thousand times worse than any flu I’ve ever had,” said Munkacy, who at the time was an anesthesiologist with a 2-year-old son. “Before [medical cannabis] became legal, people would have to choose between breaking the law and suffering terribly.”
Convinced that medical marijuana could help other people avoid her misery, Munkacy worked to help get legalized medical marijuana on the ballot in Massachusetts in 2012, and said she is now committed to educating patients who come to her dispensary.
“Our goal is that when patients leave, they’ve learned everything they need to know,” she said.
Cannabis is generally very safe, Tishler said, as long as patients buy their medical marijuana from a dispensary, because state requirements ensure a safe, consistent product. There is no lethal dose, and the worst side effect for most of his patients, he said, is an unwanted feeling of getting high when they’ve taken too much.
Norton Arbelaez, director of government affairs for NETA, which also has a dispensary in Northampton, said that safety profile means patients can afford to be a little imprecise about what kind of marijuana they use and how much they get.
“There is some room here for the patient themselves to experiment and see what’s right for them,” he said.
In the end, that’s what Murphy did. She experimented. She tried a few joints and smoked a few times with a pipe.
She had already spent $700 paying Dr. Tishler, getting her $50 state license and buying the cannabis, so she didn’t want to invest more in the vaporizer Dr. Tishler recommended.
But even just those few weeks of occasional smoking made a big difference, Murphy said.
“It made me feel like I had an appetite for the first time in probably six months,” she said. “Instead of lying around thinking about how sick I felt all the time — which was not my personality, which was very upsetting to my whole family — I was up and cooking, which was not anything I had done since I hadn’t felt well.”
Murphy, who is now cancer-free, hasn’t smoked since her treatments ended in the summer of 2016. She still wishes patients didn’t have to work so hard to get the information they need about medical marijuana.
Younger Patients and Cannabis
The situation for children and teens with cancer is a little different than for adults, according to Prasanna Ananth, a pediatric oncologist at Yale Cancer Center. Ananth published a study in early December showing that an overwhelming majority of pediatric oncologists, nurses and other health care professionals in Massachusetts, Illinois and Washington state were willing to consider medical marijuana for children with cancer — particularly for those with advanced illness.
There are decades of research showing the potential dangers of marijuana for children and teenagers, but almost none into its possible benefits for young cancer patients, she said.
“Our calculus shifts when we’re talking about children facing serious, life-threatening illness,” Ananth said. “Health care providers must weigh their desire to provide compassionate care for their patients against limited scientific evidence to support use of medical marijuana by children.”
In her survey, nearly 1 in 3 pediatric oncology experts said they had been asked about medical marijuana by at least one patient.
Ananth said she would prefer to talk with her patients about their marijuana use than not know that they’re using it.
“Especially for the purpose of knowing what my patients are on and what the medical marijuana might interact with, it is important for us to maintain open lines of communication,” she said.
With Legal Pot Shops, Medical Use May See Boost
It’s not clear how Massachusetts’ medical marijuana system will change later this year when recreational marijuana sales are set to begin. Patients will pay 20 percent less than recreational users because they won’t have to pay taxes on their cannabis.
But Munkacy said she believes many more people will start using cannabis for their medical problems once recreational use becomes legal.
They may not have wanted to give their name to the state for a license, but the reduced restrictions and added legitimacy of legal marijuana will give them the push they need to start using it, Munkacy explained.
“I’m thinking there’s going to be a lot of people who will no longer have to buy their medicine on the black market.”
The first version of this story appeared on WBUR’s CommonHealth. Karen Weintraub spent 20 years in newsrooms before becoming a freelance writer in January 2010. She contributes to CommonHealth.
