January 10, 2018

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Star Trek' vs. 'Star Wars,' Fan-Made 'Alien' Roller Coaster Demo and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup of the Day:

Captain Kirk has the Force in this fan-made Star Trek and Star Wars crossover from Styder HD (via Screen Rant):

[embedded content]

Dream Ride of the Day:

Now that Disney is going to own the Alien franchise, maybe they can add this awesome roller coaster idea to one of their parks (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Reworked Franchise of the Day:

Maybe the current DC movies would be more popular if Henry Cavill’s mustache wasn’t digitally erased for his portrayl of Superman:

[embedded content]

Filmmaking Tip of the Day:

For Filmmaker IQ, John P. Hess tells directors how to get their short films into festivals:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Walter Hill, who turns 76 today, directs Nick Nolte and Eddie Murphy on the set of 48 Hrs. in 1982:

Filmmaker in Focus:

Guillermo del Toro talks about his love of monsters in this new video essay from The Solomon Society:

[embedded content]

Theme Song Cover of the Day:

Survivor’s “Eye of the Tiger” from the Rocky movies performed by computer hardware (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Movie Trivia of the Day:

See how much you don’t know about Lethal Weapon with this list of trivia from CineFix:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Check out all the Freddy Krueger cosplay in this new trailer for the Nightmare on Elm Street fandom documentary FredHeads (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

The year is now 2018, which is also the time in which the 1975 movie Rollerball is set. Here’s the original trailer for the sci-fi classic:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Top Fox News D.C. Reporter James Rosen Left Network After Harassment Claims

Former colleagues allege former Fox News reporter James Rosen was ousted after sexually harassing female co-workers.

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters

hide caption

toggle caption

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters

On the Friday before Christmas, Fox News confirmed that its chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, had left the network. He had worked there for 18 years and become something of a legend. The U.S. Justice Department under the Obama administration was so frustrated by his reporting on U.S. intelligence about North Korea that it conducted a leak investigation into his sources.

The network cited no reason for Rosen’s exit and did not announce it on the air. According to Rosen’s former colleagues, however, he had an established pattern of flirting aggressively with many peers and had made sexual advances toward three female Fox News journalists, including two reporters and a producer. And his departure followed increased scrutiny of his behavior at the network, according to colleagues.

This story is based on interviews with eight of Rosen’s former colleagues at the Fox News bureau in Washington, D.C., just a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol. Rosen declined to comment to NPR after it set out in detail what it intended to report.

Rosen’s behavior was drawing attention from Fox News at a time when its controlling owner, Rupert Murdoch, declared there had been no allegations of sexual misconduct at the network since the ouster of the late Fox News chairman and CEO, Roger Ailes, in July 2016.

“There was a problem with our chief executive, sort of, over the years, isolated incidents,” Murdoch said in a mid-December interview with Sky News, another news outlet in which he has a controlling stake. He then said Ailes was gone in three or four days after complaints were made. (Murdoch actually ousted Ailes 13 days after former host Gretchen Carlson filed suit against Ailes on July 6, 2016. Five years earlier, Fox News had paid $3 million to settle allegations from a former network booker that Ailes had coerced sex from her. The Murdochs say they were not aware of the payment at the time.)

Murdoch went on: “There’s been nothing else since then. That was largely political because we’re conservative.”

Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox, Fox’s parent company, had to issue a statement cleaning up the damage caused by those remarks among outraged female employees. Many female former Fox News journalists other than Carlson had come forward to attest to sexual harassment by Ailes (all of which he denied through his lawyer before Ailes’ death in 2017).

Yet Ailes was not the only prominent Fox figure accused of sexual harassment. Top prime-time host Bill O’Reilly was bought out of his contract by Fox in the spring of 2017 after The New York Times detailed the scope of multiple sexual harassment allegations against him for which he agreed to pay settlements totaling approximately $45 million to quiet them; the host Eric Bolling was fired after being accused of sending unsolicited sexually explicit texts to several female colleagues; and other top executives were ushered out as having facilitated or tolerated such behavior. A midlevel Fox News executive, Francisco Cortes, was also fired in 2017 after being accused of sexually assaulting a former Fox News contributor.

O’Reilly, Bolling and Cortes have each denied any wrongdoing. A judge this week dismissed Cortes’ allegations contained in a lawsuit against 21st Century Fox that it fired him and leaked news of the accusation to scapegoat him as a public relations ploy.

21st Century Fox and Fox News say the removal of those executives and a raft of new procedures show the network’s commitment to offering a fair and welcoming workplace for women.

The Ailes and O’Reilly sexual harassment scandals inspired further revelations about related accusations against powerful figures across numerous media institutions, including NPR, which fired two male news executives last fall.

Current and former Fox News Washington journalists characterize the Washington bureau as retaining something of a Mad Men ethos, with some male reporters frequently sending racy “topline” notes through the network’s internal messaging service.

The accusations against Rosen, who is married with young children, are more severe than that. He developed a reputation as a talented and ambitious journalist called “the professor” on the air by former political anchor Brit Hume for his interest in Watergate (Rosen wrote a book focusing on the life of former Attorney General John Mitchell that argued for a kinder reassessment of his role in that Nixon-era scandal). Rosen has sent such messages, according to his former female co-workers. But in three instances he made overt physical and sexual overtures, according to the accounts of numerous former Fox News colleagues who heard about the incidents contemporaneously.

In the winter following the September 2001 terrorist attacks, a female Fox News reporter joined the bureau from New York. In a shared cab ride back from a meal, Rosen groped her, grabbing her breast. After she rebuffed his advance, Rosen sought to steal away her sources and stories related to his interests in diplomacy and national security. That’s according to four colleagues who say she relayed the episode as a warning about Rosen’s behavior. The reporter declined to comment for this story. (NPR has decided not to name the women in this article as they have not granted permission to do so.)

In a subsequent episode several years later, a female producer covering the State Department alleged that Rosen had directly sexually harassed her. A foreign national, she subsequently accepted a deal from Fox that enabled her to extend her stay in the U.S. in exchange for not making her complaint public, according to several of her former colleagues. The producer, who now works for a foreign-based news organization, is abroad with family and did not respond to several detailed messages left by email and phone seeking comment.

Late last spring, Rosen turned his attention to a younger female reporter, according to two colleagues who say she told them of the incident shortly afterward. Returning from a lunch together, Rosen physically tried to kiss her in the elevator ride back to the office, and once refused, attempted forcibly to kiss her again. According to a colleague, he then asked the reporter to keep the approach quiet and offered her unsolicited help in getting more time on Bret Baier’s nightly political newscast, Special Report. The female reporter declined to comment for this story.

Fox News executives say privately it takes time to reverse problems in a culture set from the top by Ailes.

Under a new top human resources executive, Fox News last summer placed a human resources employee in the bureau for the first time. In response to detailed questions, Fox News declined to comment on its Washington bureau or Rosen beyond affirming his departure.

Yet some female employees at Fox’s D.C. bureau say the company seemed late to turn its attention southward from its main headquarters in New York City, given the Ailes scandal. The bureau is a large outpost and a mainstay of the network’s coverage. Its reporters, producers and hosts serve up stories, segments and shows that help fuel Fox programming throughout the day and evening.

And employees interviewed pointed to earlier related incidents in D.C. The former Fox News correspondent Rudi Bakhtiar alleged that she was dismissed in 2007 after she made complaints that the new Washington bureau chief, Brian Wilson, had propositioned her. After she filed an internal complaint, Fox’s Ailes informed her she was being let go because of her performance. She was paid an undisclosed sum in a private settlement.

In another instance, Catherine Herridge, a former Fox weekend host who is now a Washington-based national security correspondent for the network, made a range of allegations in a November 2010 complaint filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — including sexual and age discrimination, unequal pay, and job retaliation for raising complaints internally. She alleged she had been subjected to a “glass ceiling.” She also said that Fox News general counsel Dianne Brandi had conducted the internal investigation even though she was one of the people identified in Herridge’s complaint.

The EEOC said it did not have sufficient evidence to support many of Herridge’s accusations but ultimately sued Fox News, alleging it had unlawfully retaliated against her. The suit was dismissed. Herridge and Fox signed a new contract and she remains on the air.

Brandi, then the network’s top lawyer, characterized the EEOC’s suit as “politically motivated.” Brandi is now on extended leave from Fox News, which is the focus of an ongoing criminal inquiry by federal prosecutors for its handling of payments to women who alleged sexual harassment there.

Rosen’s departure was a surprise — with no celebration of his achievements on the air, no announcement to viewers, nor much warning to colleagues. He had attended a holiday party for Baier’s show, Special Report, just a few days earlier.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Fallout From 'Nuclear Button' Tweets: Jump In Sales Of Radiation Drug

Pharmacist Donna Barsky measures potassium iodide at the Texas Star Pharmacy in 2011 in Plano, Texas.

Richard Matthews/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Richard Matthews/AP

A Twitter battle over the size of each “nuclear button” possessed by President Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un has triggered a surge in sales of a drug that protects against radiation poisoning.

Troy Jones, who runs the website www.nukepills.com, said demand for potassium iodide soared last week, after Trump tweeted that he had a “much bigger & more powerful” button than Kim – a statement that raised new fears about an escalating threat of nuclear war.

“On Jan. 2, I basically got in a month’s supply of potassium iodide and I sold out in 48 hours,” said Jones, 53, who is a top distributor of the drug in the United States. His Mooresville, N.C., company sells all three types of the over-the-counter product approved by the Food and Drug Administration. No prescription is required.

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2018

In that two-day period, Jones said, he shipped about 140,000 doses of potassium iodide, also known as KI, which blocks the thyroid from absorbing radioactive iodine and protects against the risk of cancer. Without the tweet, he typically would have sent out about 8,400 doses to private individuals, he said.

Jones also sells to government agencies, hospitals and universities, which aren’t included in that count.

Alan Morris, president of the Williamsburg, Va.-based pharmaceutical company Anbex Inc., which distributes potassium iodide, said he has seen a bump in demand, too.

“We are a wonderful barometer of the level of anxiety in the country,” Morris said.

A spokeswoman for a third company, Recipharm AB, which sells low-dose KI tablets, declined to comment on recent sales.

Jones said this isn’t the first time in recent months that jitters over growing nuclear tensions have boosted sales of the drug, which comes in tablet and liquid form and should be taken within hours of exposure to radiation.

It’s the same substance often added to table salt to provide trace amounts of iodine that ensure proper thyroid function. Jones sells his tablets for about 65 cents each, though they’re cheaper in bulk. Morris said he sells the pills to the federal government for about a penny apiece.

Yet, neither the FDA nor the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that families stockpile potassium iodide as an antidote against nuclear emergency.

“KI (potassium iodide) cannot protect the body from radioactive elements other than radioactive iodine — if radioactive iodine is not present, taking KI is not protective and could cause harm,” the CDC’s website states.

The drug, which has a shelf life of up to seven years, protects against absorption of radioactive iodine into the thyroid. But that means that it protects only the thyroid, not other organs or body systems, said Dr. Anupam Kotwal, an endocrinologist speaking for the Endocrine Society.

“This is kind of mostly to protect children, people ages less than 18 and pregnant women,” Kotwal said.

States with nuclear reactors and populations within a 10-mile radius of the reactors stockpile potassium iodide to distribute in case of an emergency, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. An accident involving one of those reactors is far more likely than any nuclear threat from Kim Jong Un, Anbex’s Morris said.

Still, the escalating war of words between the U.S. and North Korea has unsettled many people, Jones said. Although some of his buyers may hold what could be regarded as fringe views, many others do not.

“It’s moms and dads,” he said. “They’re worried and they find that these products exist.”

Such concern was underscored last week, when the CDC announced a briefing on the “Public Health Response to a Nuclear Detonation.” One of the planned sessions is titled “Preparing for the Unthinkable.”

Hundreds of people shared the announcement on social media, with varying degrees of alarm that it could have been inspired by the presidential tweet.

Does 21st Century America realize the horror of all of this?
Remember duck-and-cover?
Time to watch “On The Beach” for a little wake-up reality.#VeteransAgainstTrump@TheDemocrats
RT
The #CDC Wants to Get People Ready for a Nuclear Detonation https://t.co/MP4h34p4IA

— Jackson Steele (@askboomer1949) January 8, 2018

A CDC spokeswoman, however, said the briefing had been “in the works” since last spring. The agency held a similar session on nuclear disaster preparedness in 2010.

“CDC has been active in this area for several years, including back in 2011, when the Fukushima nuclear power plant was damaged during a major earthquake,” the agency’s Kathy Harben said in an email.

Indeed, Jones saw big spikes in potassium iodide sales after the Fukushima Daichii disaster, after North Korea started launching missiles — and after Trump was elected.

“I now follow his Twitter feed just to gauge the day’s sales and determine how much to stock and how many radiation emergency kits to prep for the coming week,” Jones said, adding later: “I don’t think he intended to have this kind of effect.”

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundationthat is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente. Follow JoNel Aleccia on Twitter: @JoNel_Aleccia.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

How Instant Replay Sucks The Fun From Football

Commentator Mike Pesca says watching football is no longer just glorious enjoyment of fantastic plays. With the NFL’s frequent use of instant replay, it’s become an exercise in scrutiny and doubt.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

The Super Bowl is just weekends away – four of them. Commentator Mike Pesca is already anxious – not about which team will make the Super Bowl or which team will win but the referees will rule.

MIKE PESCA, BYLINE: To me, the word catch means the act of grasping and holding a projectile, but the NFL has expanded the definition. According to the official rulebook, if a player is thought to have caught the ball, he, quote, “must maintain control of the ball until after his initial contact with the ground. And if the ball touches the ground before he regains control, it is not a catch.” Jargony definitions of a simple act are not actually the problem here. The problem is this definition leaves open the possibility that a catch – regarded as a catch since the pioneer and coach Newt Rockne conceived of the forward pass – could actually become an un-catch (ph) when subjected to withering scrutiny.

In today’s NFL, we have the technology. We can scrutinize every play. We can observe, dissect, replay and debate every squirt and wiggle of the spheroid in the receiver’s hands. And what should be the most glorious moments of a football game are second-guessed before they’re even first experienced. Here’s Tony Romo, CBS announcer, analyzing the only touchdown of last weekend’s playoff game between Jacksonville and Buffalo.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JIM NANTZ: He’s got his man for the touchdown.

TONY ROMO: It was good defense, and it was a great throw. I got to make sure he caught this, though. That ball looked like it may have moved in his hands.

PESCA: It didn’t move. It was a touchdown, and it was met by doubt when it should have been met by rapture. It’s not just catches, all plays in a sport that should be dictated by sinew and fast-twitch muscles are now mere excuses for cautious forensic videography. Here is Sean McDonough’s call on ESPN in what should have been the most interesting play of the game between the Titans and Chiefs.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

SEAN MCDONOUGH: It deflects back to him for a touchdown for the moment. But was he across the line of scrimmage?

PESCA: He wasn’t. That call should have gone – Mariota, pass deflected. He caught it. Mariota caught it himself, of all the crazy backwards inverted abaft plays. But no, instead of celebrating, we had to dwell on it. We had to stew in our own doubt. Baseball announcer Jack Buck, in one of the most famous home run calls ever, yelled, I don’t believe what I just saw. Now, announcers sheepishly dampen the marvel. Now, we don’t believe what we just saw. And this could be an explanation for the NFL’s modest decline in popularity, along with politics and head trauma.

We no longer know what we’ve just seen. We have to stop and debate what was once evident. We’re not an audience. We’re land surveyors or jewelers squinting through a loop. As with so many aspects of life, technology has promised clarity, but, in fact, it has muddied our experience. Referees were once the gatekeepers. They were sometimes wrong, but their word was final. And now that these arbiters have given way to ambiguity, we are finding ourselves unpleasantly awash in uncertainty.

INSKEEP: I don’t believe what I just heard. Mike Pesca, the author of the forthcoming book “Upon Further Review: The Great What-Ifs In Sports History’ and also the host of the Slate podcast “The Gist.”

Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)