December 20, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Stranger Things' vs. 'The Lord of the Rings,' Retro 'Avengers: Infinity War' Trailer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup of the Day:

A bit of dialogue and Sean Astin form a bridge leading to a perfect crossover between Stranger Things and The Lord of the Rings:

[embedded content]

Reworked Movie of the Day:

Speaking of mashing movies together, M. Night Shyamalan’s Lady in the Water looks much better when you add the score and some dialogue from Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water:

[embedded content]

Reworked Trailer of the Day:

Burt Reynolds is Tony Stark in Darth Blender’s retro version of the Avengers: Infinity War trailer using footage from old TV and movies:

[embedded content]

Movie Primer of the Day:

Speaking of Avengers: Infinity War, here’s an alphabetical guide to the upcoming Marvel movie from ScreenRant:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

George Roy Hill, who was born on this day in 1922, directs Robin Williams on the set of the 1982 movie The World According to Garp:

Actor in the Spotlight:

Bright up your day with this collaged supercut of Tom Hanks dancing in his movies set to a Dave Matthews Band song:

[embedded content]

Movie Comparison of the Day:

With the new Jumanji in theaters, Couch Tomato shows 24 reasons why the original Jumanji and Goosebumps are the same movie:

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

In this edition of CineFix’s Reelistic, an expert talks about what movies get right and wrong about VR:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

With It now available on demand, it’s a good time for another Pennywise cosplayer showcase:

Pennywise by JinxKittie – https://t.co/BGCMd5RXUhpic.twitter.com/UaC6w2LVVL

— Lovely Cosplay (@lovelycosplay) December 20, 2017

Classic Movie Clip of the Day:

Today is the 60th anniversary of the release of Stanley Kubrick’s Paths of Glory. Watch one of the most iconic scenes from the classic war film below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Police Reportedly Clear Venus Williams Of Blame In Fatal Car Crash

Venus Williams, seen in body camera footage from June, listens to a police officer following a car crash that fatally injured an elderly man.

Palm Beach Gardens Police Department via AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Palm Beach Gardens Police Department via AP

Venus Williams will not be charged in the collision that led to the death of a passenger in another car in Florida earlier this year, according to multiple media outlets quoting local police. The decision marks a reversal from authorities’ initial assessment of the accident, which had laid fault primarily with the longtime tennis icon.

“Based upon this investigation and relevant Florida state statutes, no charges will be filed in this case,” reads the assessment of the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department, as the local Sun Sentinel newspaper reports. The investigation also found no fault with the driver whose car struck Williams’ vehicle.

The department did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for comment.

The results of the probe offer a new twist to the incident, the details of which have been unspooling unevenly since the fatal collision.

At first, authorities said Williams ran a red light and thus caused the crash that injured Jerome Barson, 78, who died of those injuries two weeks later. Yet not long afterward, police announced that surveillance footage appeared to show a different story — that Williams had actually entered the intersection legally before she was cut off and, in the words of The Associated Press, set off “a chain of events that seconds later resulted in a fatal crash with a third car.”

Body camera footage released weeks later offered a closer look at the accident’s aftermath, during which the officer on the scene told Williams he’d say she was at fault — but added, “I don’t feel comfortable writing a citation when I’m not a hundred percent sure, and I’m not a hundred percent sure in this case.”

Williams has not commented publicly on the report reportedly clearing her of blame. In June, after news of the crash surfaced, she wrote on Facebook that she was “devastated and heartbroken by this accident.”

Wednesday’s news does not bring an end to the questions surrounding the incident, however. There may be no criminal charges coming against Williams, but the Sun Sentinel notes that Barson’s family has already filed a lawsuit against her.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Small Breweries And Distilleries Are Winning With The New Tax Plan

Small breweries and distilleries will receive a big tax break under the new tax plan. NPR’s Ari Shapiro speaks with Lynne Weaver of Three Weavers Brewing Company.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Now we’re going to hear about another industry that benefits from this new tax law. Small craft breweries get a big tax cut. Lynne Weaver is the founder of Three Weavers Brewery in the Los Angeles area. Coincidentally, she also has a background in tax policy. She joins us now from the brewery. Welcome to the program.

LYNNE WEAVER: Thank you for having me.

SHAPIRO: Describe the change and how you’ll be taxed under this new law.

WEAVER: The excise tax is based on a per-barrel production. So it’s whatever we package and send out of our brewery. We pay $7 per barrel of beer. It ends up making up close to 15 to 20, sometimes even 25 percent of our total cost of our beer. So the reduction in that tax is going to be greatly beneficial to us because it reduces our overall cost of goods.

SHAPIRO: Reduction from $7 a barrel to about what?

WEAVER: The new reduction is down to $3.50 a barrel.

SHAPIRO: And that’s only for breweries that produce less than a certain amount of beer. So the big brewers don’t get as big of a cut, right?

WEAVER: That is correct.

SHAPIRO: So if the excise tax is basically cut in half for you, how much money will that mean for you in a typical year?

WEAVER: Next year when it’s actually going to take place, our goal is to produce 10,000 barrels, so it’s going to be quite a bit of money for us. It’s going to be close to $21,000. That’s a part-time person. It allows us to hire somebody else. It helps quite a bit.

SHAPIRO: You say it’s enough money to hire a part-time person. Is that what you plan to do with the money?

WEAVER: Yeah. I think that for most small breweries, the area in which is the most fluid in needing capital is really in labor. Once you buy equipment, the equipment is pretty much what it is. You have the capital outlay. But to fill those tanks requires a person to be able to brew.

I think a lot of craft breweries have to stretch their staff because they just don’t have the funds available to be able to bring on somebody else to alleviate the workload. But having, like, the additional funds from the excise tax reduction will allow us to be able to bring somebody else in.

SHAPIRO: Some people are critical of lawmakers choosing specific industries to benefit, choosing winners and losers. Obviously you have the advantage of being a winner here, but do you have any hesitation about certain industries getting a boost and other industries not?

WEAVER: Well, to be totally honest, the craft beer industry hasn’t had a boost in a very long period of time. If you look at how long the excise tax has been around for, there has never been a change. It’s always been at $7 a barrel for beer. So if anything, the craft beer industry has been at a disadvantage with this excise tax.

SHAPIRO: You say the craft beer industry has not had much relief lately, and yet it’s done very well. Five years ago, there were about 2,000 craft brewers in the U.S. Last year, there were 5,000. It doesn’t sound like an industry that needs a lot of tax relief.

WEAVER: Well, that’s skewed. So the vast majority of the breweries that are opening today or even are open are probably 3,000 barrels or less in production and really service a very small community. So you can’t really look at it in the sense of how many breweries are opening because it doesn’t necessarily mean that all of them are yet profitable. So if anything, those smaller breweries really do need this tax break just to be able to continue supporting their communities, creating those jobs.

SHAPIRO: One principle of taxation is that you should have higher taxes on things that you want people to do less. That’s why there are cigarette taxes and some places have soda taxes. By that rationale, could somebody argue that beer makers should be taxed more, not less?

WEAVER: We’re talking now about vices – essentially vices and the excise tax or luxury taxes, right? Well, one of the things about craft beer – it’s not just about beer. It’s about what we provide within our communities, the job creation – all of those things. So if those are tied to what somebody considers a vice, then, you know, it’s like, you’ve got to kind of balance those two items. And really, I really believe that it negates the negative side as long as we are always responsible.

SHAPIRO: Lynne Weaver is the founder of Three Weavers Brewery in Southern California. Thanks so much for joining us.

WEAVER: I appreciate it. Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF VAMPIRE WEEKEND SONG, “OXFORD COMMA”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)