December 14, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Batman vs. Dracula Fan-Made Trailer, How 'Star Wars' Was Saved and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup of the Day:

There have been many versions of both Batman and Dracula, but this fan-made retro version from Stryder HD pits Michael Keaton against Gary Oldman:

[embedded content]

Remade Trailer of the Day:

With Star Wars: The Last Jedi in theaters this weekend, here’s another sweded version of its trailer:

[embedded content]

Film Studies Lesson of the Day:

This video essay from RocketJump Film School looks at how Star Wars was saved in the editing:

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

For Nerdist, Kyle Hill scientifically explains why death by lightsaber would be much worse in real life:

[embedded content]

Movie Inspiration of the Day:

ScreenCrush looks at how Star Wars: The Force Awakens is inspired by the myth of King Arthur:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Lee Remick, who was born on this day in 1935, poses while Otto Preminger directs James Stewart and Duke Ellington on the set of Anatomy of a Murder in 1959:

End of the Year Recap of the Day:

Here’s another look at the movies of 2017, this one by Cinema Dream and focused on the blockbusters of the year:

[embedded content]

Movie Food of the Day:

Get warmed up this winter by making Ned Flanders’s hot cocoa from The Simpsons Movie with help from Binging with Babish:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

NBC News did a story on the Cosplay Parents featuring this image of the couple as Nick Wilde and Judy Hopps from Zootopia:

Meet the ‘Cosplay Parents’ devoting retirement to costumes and conventions
“If you meet your soulmate or someone with your same interests, you have to go for it,” Millie Tani said. https://t.co/R1IJUIoiyk via @NBCNewspic.twitter.com/LRrv8t9Km0

— ??Cosplay in America?? (@cosplayamerica) December 14, 2017

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This weekend is the 30th anniversary of the release of Moonstruck. Watch the original trailer for the Oscar-winning classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What Are The Two Health Bills Sen. Susan Collins Wants Congress To Act On?

Maine Sen. Susan Collins voted for the Senate GOP tax plan despite its repeal of the individual mandate because GOP leadership promised her a vote on her reinsurance bill, and a vote on legislation to restore some payments to insurers. But it’s doubtful getting those provisions enacted would mitigate the damage to exchanges from the mandate repeal.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Inside the latest version of the Republicans’ tax bill, the one hammered out by the Senate and the House, is a provision on health care. It amounts to a repeal of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, something that could undermine the health care exchanges. It had seemed to be a sticking point for Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins. But Collins now indicates that she will back the tax bill if Congress acts on two other health measures. Maine Public Radio’s Patty Wight reports.

PATTY WIGHT, BYLINE: Senator Collins has never been a fan of the individual mandate.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

SUSAN COLLINS: Never the less, I recognize that repeal of the individual mandate would have consequences for the stability and the premiums in the individual market.

WIGHT: The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that repealing the mandate would hike premiums about 10 percent annually over the next decade and cause 13 million people to lose coverage. Collins says the solution is found in two proposed bills.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

COLLINS: Together, those two bills would more than offset the increase in premiums.

WIGHT: One bill sponsored by Republican Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington would restore payments President Trump recently ended. Those payments helped insurance companies reduce costs for people with low incomes. But Mitchell Stein, a health policy consultant, says that’s a separate issue from the mandate.

MITCHELL STEIN: To say that that will impact the negative effects of eliminating the mandate is like saying, to quote Senator Murray herself, it’s like saying you can fight a fire by giving someone a shot of penicillin.

WIGHT: The second bill that Collins wants passed is one she’s co-sponsoring with Democratic Senator Bill Nelson of Florida that would fund a reinsurance program.

STEVE BUTTERFIELD: You know, reinsurance isn’t a bad idea.

WIGHT: At least in theory, says Steve Butterfield, policy director for the Maine-based advocacy group Consumers for Affordable Health Care.

BUTTERFIELD: It’s something that you do, you know, to stabilize a market influx.

WIGHT: For example, if the individual mandate penalty goes away, younger, healthier people might forgo insurance, leaving older, sicker consumers in the market. Collins’ bill would give states funding to help pay their higher medical costs. But it’s only $10 billion over the next two years, says Butterfield.

BUTTERFIELD: You can’t permanently repeal a critical component of America’s current health care system forever and then say, well, you know, here’s a Band-Aid for two years. You guys can limp through until a future Congress fixes what we’re breaking.

WIGHT: But Collins points to an analysis by consulting firm Avalere, which found that the two bills would increase enrollment by 1.3 million people and lower premiums by 18 percent in 2019.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

COLLINS: And that is more than the 10 percent increase in premiums that would result from repealing the individual mandate.

CAROLINE PEARSON: The story’s much bigger than premiums.

WIGHT: That’s Avalere’s Caroline Pearson. She says the analysis Collins mentions did include a caveat. It did not examine the bills in the context of no individual mandate. No mandate, says Pearson…

PEARSON: Could create significant instability in the market. And it may cause some insurers to drop out of the market, which really could lead to a lack of coverage availability for some consumers.

WIGHT: Another question hanging over those bills is whether Congress will pass them. Senator Collins has a written commitment from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that he will support their passage before the end of the year. House leadership has not provided a written commitment, but Collins says she’s received assurance from the vice president. For NPR News, I’m Patty Wight.

SIEGEL: That story is part of a partnership of NPR, member stations and Kaiser Health News.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Most Important Economic Indicator That Everyone Ignored

This week on All Things Considered, we’re sharing a series of “Highly Specific Superlatives.” Cardiff Garcia from NPR’s podcast The Indicator talks about the most important economic indicator in 2017 that everyone ignored: global trade.

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

There are a few economic indicators that got a lot of play this year – the unemployment rate, the GDP the Dow. Now we’re going to talk about another economic indicator as part of our series Highly Specific Superlatives, in which we nerd out about the best, the worst, the least, the most of 2017. NPR’s Cardiff Garcia co-hosts NPR’s newest podcast The Indicator. It’s about the big ideas behind business news. And he is with us now. Hey.

CARDIFF GARCIA, BYLINE: Hi, Kelly.

MCEVERS: So hit me. What is your highly specific superlative from 2017?

GARCIA: My highly specific and also highly nerdy superlative is the most ignored indicator that actually says a lot about the economy – the global economy. It’s the pace of growth in global trade, the pace of growth in how much we buy and sell goods and services across borders to and from other countries.

MCEVERS: OK, global trade, yeah.

GARCIA: Yep.

MCEVERS: Tell me about it. Like, what’s – give me a little snapshot of what that indicator tells us.

GARCIA: I love this indicator. And the snapshot is that it’s growing a lot. The IMF projects that by the end of this year it will have grown 4.2 percent. That is a big acceleration on last year. And I think what I love most about this superlative is that it contrasts so starkly with the headlines that we’ve seen all year about the world turning inward and about protectionism and about countries becoming more self-reliant. I love that this just kind of goes so starkly against that narrative.

MCEVERS: Well, yeah so – OK, explain that because, I mean, you know, I think a lot of people think, like, we’re pulling out of trade deals. We’re tightening borders. We’ve you know, scrapped deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership and threatened to tear up NAFTA and all of that stuff. So, like, how does this square with all that?

GARCIA: Yeah. So I guess the simple answer here is that so far at least, there’s been more talk than action. So yeah, we’ve threatened to pull out of NAFTA, but NAFTA is still in place. We did leave the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but keep in mind that the other 11 countries are still going ahead. And so what we’ve learned is also that the U.S. isn’t the only country that matters here, that this is global trade, not just U.S. trade with everybody else – and so…

MCEVERS: Right.

GARCIA: …More talk than action. And also, we’re learning that maybe the U.S. isn’t the only place that that counts here.

MCEVERS: OK. How do we want to think about this going forward?

GARCIA: Yeah. I mean, this is a – it’s a complicated narrative. If you think about it, it’s not like right now if you make a product in another country and then you send it to a country to be bought and sold, that that’s the way things still work. That’s sort of the old world, right? Now the way it works is that as a product gets made, it passes through a bunch of different countries, and each country has a process or a factory that adds a component or a new way of making it by the time it gets to its final destination to be sold.

And so even if you make it hard to do business with, say, Mexico, well, OK then, the factory and that process just shifts somewhere else. It’s like this big supply chain gets redirected. And so what we’re seeing now is that it’s just really, really hard to deconstruct that process. The world is very closely integrated, and it’s not easy for any one or two places to just turn that away.

MCEVERS: NPR’s Cardiff Garcia co-hosts The Indicator. It’s a podcast about the big ideas behind business news. Thanks a lot.

GARCIA: Thanks, Kelly.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

A Kind Of Chaos: The Science And Sport Of Bobsledding

A U.S. sled makes its way through curve 10 on the Lake Placid, N.Y. track during training runs.

John Tully for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

John Tully for NPR

Imagine a minute of pure adrenaline: a race down a track of ice at speeds up to 90 miles an hour, enduring crushing gravitational forces around the curves.

Bobsled is one of the thrilling — and punishing — sports in the Winter Olympics. The U.S. hopes to repeat its recent medal-winning performances at the 2018 Olympics next February in Pyeongchang, South Korea.

Meantime, they’re competing on the World Cup circuit, including a stop in Lake Placid, N.Y., site of the 1932 and 1980 winter Olympics. High up on Mt. Van Hoevenberg, bobsledders from around the world launch into practice runs. The glistening track is about a mile long, with 20 sharply-banked curves. It’s beautiful, but terrifying.

“A good run, especially in Lake Placid, can feel like you’ve been shoved in a metal garbage can and kicked down a rocky hill,” bobsled pilot Elana Meyers Taylor says.

She’s a two-timeOlympic medalist (silver in Sochi in 2014; bronze in Vancouver in 2010).

“Yeah, it can hurt,” fellow driver Jamie Greubel Poser, who won bronze in Sochi, says. “We consider bobsled an impact sport. You’re hitting walls at 80 miles an hour. It can literally feel like a boxing match. I’ve ‘seen stars’ driving.”

“[When] we’re going down, the whole thing is just vibrating,” pilot Nick Cunningham says. “It’s loud, it’s cold, there’s no padding inside the sled. It’s very, very uncomfortable. But when you win a medal, it makes everything completely worth it.”

A bobsled (‘bobsleigh’ via the Olympics website) run starts with the all-important push: the initial burst of acceleration, as athletes run alongside the sled, propelling it down the first 50 meters of the course. The sleds themselves weigh hundreds of pounds, so explosive strength and speed in the push are critical. (It’s no accident that many bobsled athletes, Greubel Poser and Cunningham among them, come to the sport from the world of track and field).

After the push comes the load. In a two-person bobsled, the pilot jumps over the side into the front, while the brakeman vaults in from behind like a long jumper. They have to do it both quickly and delicately, so the sled doesn’t skid out. (Watch a video explainer here).

U.S. National team member, Carlo Valdes, left, and Codie Bascue, right, push off from the start for their training run in Lake Placid.

John Tully for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

John Tully for NPR

In the four-man event, the choreography is even more intricate. The team must cram four massively muscular bodies into a narrow bobsled while sprinting at full speed. They need to perfectly coordinate who jumps in first, in what order they sit down, and where their legs go as they fold themselves in.

“It’s kinda chaos sometimes,” says Evan Weinstock, who sits in the second position, just behind the driver. Only the driver has an actual seat; the others sit on their heels,“tucked up in a little cannonball position,” Weinstock explains.

“It’s tough,” he says. “You definitely get a lot more flexible. If you weren’t before you got in the sport, you are now.”

Another peril is that bobsledders wear shoes studded with sharp spikes for traction on the ice. Bad things can happen when they jump in the sled and have to jam their feet under the teammate in front of them.

“We’re only wearing little layers of spandex,” Weinstock says.”So sometimes you get a spike in your thigh or your calf. It’s just part of it.”

Once they load, the athletes hunker down low to be as aerodynamic as possible. Bobsled racesare won or lost by hundredths of a second, so every tiny amount of drag or friction can spell trouble.

“Any single steer you do slows the sled down because it creates friction,” Elana Meyers Taylor says. “Who can slow the sled down the least wins the race.”

During the descent, it’s all in the hands of the pilot, who steers with two “D rings” attached to cables that turn the front axle.

Pilot Jamie Greubel Poser steers her sled out of a section known as ‘Benham’s Bend’ and onto ‘The Chicane’ straightaway during a training run in Lake Placid.

John Tully for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

John Tully for NPR

“You’re pulling right to go right, and you’re pulling left to go left,” Cunningham says. “I look like I’m playing a little video game.”

The others in the bobsled keep their heads down, so they don’t actually see anything as they hurtle down the course. Pilot Nick Cunningham says that’s probably just as well.

“I don’t want them to realize some of the things I’ve seen in the front of that sled,” he laughs. “There’s been some hairy times goin’ down where I’m, like, ‘that was dangerous!'”

But even so, he won’t admit it to his teammates: “I’m just, ‘All right, guys, that was a good trip! Let’s go back to the top.’ And I’m sitting, going, ‘Oh man, that wasn’t good at all!'”

As the sleds speed around a curve, essentially vertical on a wall of ice, spectators can see the athletes’ bodies shaking from the intense pressures exerted on them. Bobsledders endure forces up to 5 Gs, which means they’ll feel force equal to five times their weight.

“It’s like the G forces are trying to suck you through the bottom of the bobsled,” Evan Weinstock says. “It forces our stomachs through our legs. It feels like you’re getting folded in half like a pancake.”

One tiny wrong move in a bobsled can mean disaster.

The Lake Placid track is known among athletes as one of the more technically challenging courses in the World Cup circuit.

John Tully for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

John Tully for NPR

“Crashing is one of those things that it’s not a matter of if, it’s just a matter of when,” Elana Meyers Taylor says.

She’s crashed more times than she can count.

“There’s sharp things in the sled that’ll cut you up,” she says. “And the biggest thing is, it is very, very loud. It is scraping, and it is piercing.”

In the sport of bobsled, Meyers Taylor says, “we’re all playing with Newton’s laws. And whoever can navigate those laws the best, wins the race.”

“A lot of physics actually goes into it,” Cunningham adds with a grin. “Go figure, because in high school, I was always, ‘Ah, I don’t need this stuff, I’ll never use this stuff again.’ And now, that’s how I make a living.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)