December 12, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Avengers: Infinity War' in Lego, 'Star Wars' Goes Indie and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Remade Trailer of the Day:

Huxley Berg Studios works their Lego re-creation magic with the first Avengers: Infinity War:

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

For another great Lego video, here’s a Furious 7-inspired Star Wars video in honor of the passing of Carrie Fisher:

[embedded content]

Fake Movie of the Day:

With so many Star Wars movies being made, why not a romantic indie set in the Galaxy like this parody from Funny or Die?

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Need more Star Wars? Here’s a flaming bagpipe-playing unicyclist dressed as a Rebel pilot taking down an inflatable AT-AT (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Sketch of the Day:

One more Star Wars item, here’s a sketch from The Late Show with Stephen Colbert featuring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker being denied entry into the Mos Eisley Cantina:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

What might that cake be made of? Edward G. Robinson celebrates the start of his 101st (and final) movie with co-stars Paula Kelly, Charlton Heston, Cheri Howell, Marion Charles and Joyce Williams on the set of Soylent Green in 1972:

Actor in the Spotlight:

Today is also Jennifer Connelly’s birthday, so IMDb made a supercut of her movie roles:

[embedded content]

Easter Eggs of the Day:

ScreenCrush looks through the new trailer for Ready Player One and spotlights all the Easter eggs and clues in the movie:

[embedded content]

Movie Influence of the Day:

Speaking of movie homages, here’s a BFI video eassy showing how Celine and Julie Go Boating influenced Desperately Seeking Susan:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This week is the 30th anniversary of the release of Danny DeVito’s Throw Momma From the Train. Watch the original trailer for the classic comedy below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Are $40 Toll Roads The Future?

Signs warn drivers of icy road conditions on Interstate 66 in Fairfax County, Va., in March 2014. The state’s Department of Transportation recently added rush hour tolls to the road, using dynamic pricing, which continuously adjusts the cost based on congestion.

Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

How much would you pay to avoid traffic jams on your daily commute? $10? $20? How about $40?

That’s how much a tollway in the Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., charged for a short time last week. Outraged commuters call it highway robbery.

But transportation officials say the high-priced toll is less about money and more about changing commuter behavior and reducing congestion, and commuters all across the country might soon see more tolls in the future.

The 10-mile stretch of Interstate 66 from the Northern Virginia suburbs into the District of Columbia is like no other road in the country. It was built in the early 1980s for carpools and buses to use during rush hour. Over the years, officials have opened it up to hybrids and a few other exemptions, and in recent years, scofflaw single drivers violating the high-occupancy-vehicle-only law helped choke the road with gridlock.

So Virginia’s Department of Transportation is trying something controversial: ending free rides for hybrids, expanding the restricted hours and allowing solo drivers on for a price. And oh, what a high price it is.

When merging onto I-66 inside the Beltway one recent morning from Leesburg Pike in Falls Church, Uber driver Alfred Hewton looks up at the sign showing the price of the toll.

“Eleven dollars [to] Washington, D.C. $11.”

That’s $11 to drive just 10 miles, so Hewton is relieved that for him today, it’s free.

“If we have two or more people, we don’t have to pay. If you’re driving by yourself, it will cost you that much.”

Actually, it can cost quite a bit more for solo commuters because under dynamic pricing, the cost varies, changing every six minutes based on demand and to keep traffic flowing at a minimum of 45 miles an hour. On Dec. 4, the toll topped $34 for a short period of time, and the following day, the toll hit $40.

That’s enough to make any driver spit out his coffee.

“I think it’s outrageous. It’s actually an abuse of power, as far as I’m concerned,” says Alan Bechara, who lives in suburban Chantilly, Va.

“Why do we need to pay $40 for a public road, to use a public road? We funded this road; we paid for it,” he adds. “I’m a Virginia resident for 38 years. I can assure you my tax dollars funded this road.”

Mary Jaber says she understands the need for a modest toll.

“You know, maybe $5, I mean, just something more reasonable,” Jaber says. “But a daily commute of $40 plus is extraordinary; it’s extreme.”

Transportation officials say that’s actually the whole idea.

“What the toll is saying is, ‘We don’t want you to use it.’ I personally wouldn’t pay that toll,” says Virginia Transportation Secretary Aubrey Layne.

“We are definitely trying to change behavior because we have limited resources,” Layne adds. “We don’t have the money nor the political will to continue to build highways.”

Layne says heavily congested areas such as Washington, D.C., and its suburbs cannot build their way out of gridlock. So the idea behind opening up the I-66 carpool lanes to solo drivers for a high price is to actually persuade more people to carpool, to take public transportation, or to commute during off-peak hours when there is no charge.

And those who want to, he says, can spend the money to avoid congestion.

“This is a choice. No one is forced to pay this toll. And as a matter of fact, if you put someone else in your car, you never have to pay anything.”

Layne says the high prices of $34.50 last Monday and $40 on Tuesday were only charged for six minutes each, and no more than 28 drivers paid that $40 toll. Morning tolls averaged $10.25 over the first four days, and the round-trip toll price averaged $12 to $17 over the first week. Before the toll lanes opened, officials had predicted round-trip tolls would average $17 a day.

Then-Del. Bob Marshall, R-Prince William, holds a sign as he talks to the media at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., on Feb. 10, 2016, after the governor announced an agreement on an expansion plan for Interstate 66 in Northern Virginia.

Steve Helber/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Steve Helber/AP

And because this wasn’t even a legal option for solo drivers during rush hour before last week, Layne says there’s been only a little spillover effect clogging other roads with drivers trying to avoid the high tolls, though some drivers complain about more congestion at entry points where commuters are trying to decide whether to get on and pay.

While the peak prices are among the nation’s highest tolls ever charged, some see them as a sign of things to come.

“You definitely are going to see much more tolling both for general purposes, and you’re going to see tolling like the price-managed lanes on I-66 to alleviate congestion,” says Pat Jones, executive director of the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association, which represents toll facility owners and operators. Jones says there are already 40 toll facilities in 11 states, including California, Texas and Washington, using dynamic pricing, and many more under consideration across the country. Most tollways with dynamic pricing don’t have a cap or a maximum price, but they sometimes have a minimum price and averages. On Southern California’s I-91, in Orange and Riverside counties, the tolls can reach as high as $25.05.

“I think in fact we are underpaying; we’ve underpriced the highway system and evidence of that is the congestion that we see in our urban areas,” Jones says.

But many Northern Virginia commuters are not convinced, especially those who say carpooling and public transportation are not realistic options for them.

Jaber doesn’t use I-66 and believes “it’s a very unjust system. I think there are a lot of people … that are not going to use it as a reflection of obviously cost and budgeting.”

Urd Milbury, who commutes to and from her job at the Norweigan Embassy, hasn’t taken I-66 yet “and I probably won’t because of the prices. It could be extremely expensive at times, which is probably exactly when I want to go to work.”

Milbury agrees with those who call the high toll prices outrageous and thinks it will be a hardship for some families.

“You’ve got the cost of your car, you’ve got the gas, you’ve got two rounds of tolls,” she says. “It’s not sustainable.”

Meghan Jackson says she and her family “dance around” using the I-66 tollway, taking alternative routes or the Metro subway into the city. “I’m not sure if this fix will really reduce traffic in any way and I’m not really sure if its really of service to those of us living in Northern Virginia who have to get into the city.”

But with the federal highway trust fund failing to keep up with needs, and with very little new transportation funding likely coming from Washington anytime soon, tolls increasingly are becoming a go-to source for transportation funding. Commuters trying to avoid traffic jams may need to keep one hand on the wheel, and the other on their wallet.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Writer Will Leitch Defends His Position That The NFL Is Ending

NPR’s Kelly McEvers speaks with writer Will Leitch about his piece in New York Magazine: “Is this the End of the NFL?” In his piece, Leitch notes that football used to bring people together across political lines, but that’s not the case anymore.

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Is this the end of the NFL? That is the question at the top of a recent piece in New York Magazine. It was written by Will Leitch. And his answer to the question is, yeah, the NFL is kind of over. Will Leitch is here now to defend his position. Hello there.

WILL LEITCH: Hello. Good afternoon.

MCEVERS: You point out in your piece that football really used to be something that, like, brought people together. There’s this great detail you talk about, how Hunter S. Thompson and Richard Nixon even bonded over football. That’s obviously not true right now. I mean, how divisive do you feel, like, football has become?

LEITCH: Yeah. You know, one of the things – like everything else these days, the NFL has not been able to escape politics. And I think because it’s gotten so popular it is right there, dead at the center. But the problem is because it’s not been able to avoid politics it’s actually getting it from both sides. On one hand, you know, you have liberals saying that, like, the game is too cruel and worried about concussions and head injuries and the health of the players, or that the league is too militaristic and too much beloved love of the flag and all of that stuff. On the other hand, you have conservatives saying, we’re not going to watch this league until the players stop kneeling. And…

MCEVERS: Right.

LEITCH: …It’s left the league without a natural constituency.

MCEVERS: Did you ever think football would be at the – at – like, in the middle of the culture wars? Like, is this a surprise to you?

LEITCH: It’s so strange to think of the NFL, you know, which is – you know, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It is a game where people run around and throw a ball and tackle each other – has become some sort of big political thing. You know, and listen; sports has always wanted to consider itself separate than politics. Fans always claim that they want that. Like, they want to get away from politics for a day. You know, the way things are going it’s hard to blame them. I certainly understand the sentiment.

But, you know, standing for the anthem is a political act. Paying for your ticket is a political act. When these stadiums are built with public financing, these – sports has never been able to be completely separate from politics. And I think the reason the NFL has gotten caught up so much in this is it’s gotten so big. You know, the NFL really in the last decade has become so powerful in large part because how much power it has in the world of television. We’re all watching things on DVR.

MCEVERS: Right.

LEITCH: And sports, specifically the NFL, is not a DVR game. So people have to watch it live, which has helped them on ad rates. I would argue that one of the mistakes the NFL has made in that, however, is they have overcompensated in that way.

MCEVERS: Right.

LEITCH: And they’ve given away too much power to television.

MCEVERS: Whether or not this is the end of the NFL, I mean, we have to talk about concussions and injuries. I mean, I think, you know, when you used to watch a football game and you’d see a big hit you’d be like, wow. And now it’s – you know, I think we all have a very different reaction.

LEITCH: Yeah. You know, there was a time not long ago where those big hits were the highlight hits and really promoted the league. Now as more and more scientists come out about how – the damage it causes, it’s not just the big hits. It’s also just the actual sustained – they call them subconcussive hits.

MCEVERS: Yeah.

LEITCH: The dangers of the – playing football are so much more evident now. The NFL has tried to get out ahead of this, but I think you make an argument the games have actually gotten worse. The things that they’ve tried to get out of the game have not made the game safer, have made it less aesthetically pleasing. It’s an existential issue for the NFL, and it’s one they really continue to struggle with.

MCEVERS: And then you talk about how football’s really losing out to the NBA. What is it about that that they have this, like, inverse relationship, you know?

LEITCH: Yeah. The NBA is really in a peak period right now. You’ve got a team like the Golden State Warriors, an all-time great team including superstars like Kevin Durant and Stephen Curry, who is probably the most popular player in the league. You’ve got LeBron James, one of the best players of all time, who is not just, you know, a great player, but I think is one of the larger things that’s really helped out the NBA. They, unlike the NFL, have very much encouraged their players to express their personalities and sometimes to express their political beliefs.

I remember when LeBron James, after President Trump told – said that he was not going to invite Steph Curry and the Warriors to the White House, and LeBron James refuted that and actually called the president you bum, which is kind of a crazy thing to think of, an NBA player calling him you bum. But perhaps what’s even crazier is it seemed to work to shut Trump up. He actually has not talked about the NBA since then. So I guess it requires someone at the level of LeBron James.

But I do think that’s the issue. The NBA has encouraged social media. They’ve encouraged free sharing of highlights. They’ve encouraged their players to express themselves in a way that I think sells the individual and sells the excitement and the off-court stuff as well that the NFL is really kind of lumbering and struggled with.

MCEVERS: I mean, we should be clear. Like, a lot of people still watch football on TV. And this also isn’t the first time that someone has proclaimed that the game is done. I mean, it’s still holding down, like, No. 1 TV rankings.

LEITCH: Yeah. There’s no question. People are still watching the NFL. The numbers have been down a little bit, but not dramatically so. And mostly the numbers being down has just allowed people on both sides to claim that the reason they’re mad at the NFL is the reason the ratings are down. Oftentimes it’s a little bit more complicated than that.

MCEVERS: Yeah.

LEITCH: But, you know, these are – this is the type of thing where the numbers start to go down slowly and then perhaps very quickly. You know, you’ve seen the idea – you know, youth participation in football is way down. The more we understand about the damage of the game, there’s just a lot of different factors that are all kind of nibbling at the NFL on the edges. So it’s starting to wobble. And there was a time five years ago it felt like the NFL was unconquerable. And I think it’s – there’s no question there’s some wobbling going on.

MCEVERS: Will Leitch, thank you so much.

LEITCH: Of course. It’s my pleasure.

MCEVERS: Will Leitch is a contributing editor at New York Magazine and a senior writer at Sports on Earth.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Forum: Examining Discrimination Against Native Americans

Join us for a webcast of the poll results on discrimination against Native Amercians hosted by The Forum at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

iStockphoto.com/GracedByTheLight

Editor’s note 1:13 p.m.:The webcast is over. We’ll update the post with an archived video when it becomes available.

How do Native Americans experience discrimination in daily life?

A poll by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health is examining the extent of discrimination against five major ethnic and racial groups in America today. It finds that Native Americans experience very high rates of discrimination in everyday life.

More than a third of Native Americans and their family members have experienced slurs and violence, and close to a third have faced discrimination in the workplace and when interacting with the police. Native Americans who live in majority-Native American areas are significantly more likely to experience this kind of discrimination, the poll finds.

The results for Native Americans in the poll were released earlier this fall and will be highlighted in an expert panel discussion to be live-streamed here at 12 p.m. ET Tuesday, Dec. 12, as part of The Forum at the Harvard Chan School.

With unprecedented documentation, the poll provides results from police interaction, job applications, health care, racial slurs and more. The Forum will explore the results and their implications for society.

This poll is examining discrimination among African-Americans, Latinos, whites, Asian-Americans, women, and LGBTQ adults on their experiences with discrimination.

Joe Neel, deputy senior supervising editor on NPR’s Science Desk, will moderate the discussion with:

Robert Blendon, professor of health policy and political analysis, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard Kennedy School

Stephanie Fryberg, associate professor for American Indian studies and psychology, University of Washington

Michael Painter, senior program officer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and former chief of medical staff at the Seattle Indian Health Board

Yvette Roubideaux, director of the National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center and former director, Indian Health Service

Our ongoing series “You, Me and Them: Experiencing Discrimination in America” is based in part on a poll by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. We have released results for African-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans, whites, Native Americans and women.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)