November 16, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Superman's Most Dangerous Power, How 'The Incredibles' Should Have Ended and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Science of the Day:

In honor of the release of Justice League, Kyle Hill scientifically explains why Superman turning back time would be catastrophic:

[embedded content]

Alternate Ending of the Day:

Speaking of superhero movies, here’s a different way Pixar’s The Incredibles could have ended:

[embedded content]

Fan Surprise of the Day:

Speaking of Pixar, watch the stars of Coco surprise fans at Dowtown Disney with a musical performance promoting the upcoming movie:

[embedded content]

VFX Breakdown of the Day:

Netflix presents a look at the exceptional visual effects that went into creating the creature for Bong Joon Ho’s Okja:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Maggie Gyllenhaal, who turns 40 today, in a publicity photo for the 2000 John Waters movie Cecil B. Demented:

Filmmakers in Focus:

Editor Alessandro Tranchini showcases the “stillness of life” as depicted in the movies of the Coen Brothers:

[embedded content]

Film History of the Day:

In anticipation of The Disaster Artist, here’s a look at the marketing of Tommy Wiseau’s The Room that helped turn it into a cult classic:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Back to the subject of superhero movies, here’s a great Rocket Racoon with Baby Groot from Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2:

One of the best pictures I have of my Rocket Raccoon suit! My mom did that little Groot for me <3 #GuardiansOfTheGalaxyVol2#Cosplay#Rocket_Raccoon@JamesGunnpic.twitter.com/Df4WatYVlG

— Cecilia Hernandez (@Zhiibe) November 16, 2017

Movie Trivia of the Day:

In honor of this week being the 15th anniversary of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, here’s IMDb with some trivia about the movie:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 40th anniversary of the release of Steven Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Watch the original trailer for the sci-fi classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What To Make Of A Head-To-Head Test Of Addiction Treatments

Greg Miller shows the Suboxone medication in 2016 that he has taken daily for his addiction to painkillers.

Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Addiction specialists caution against reading too much into a new study released this week that compares two popular medications for opioid addiction. This much-anticipated research is the largest study so far to directly compare the widely used treatment Suboxone with relative newcomer Vivitrol.

Researchers who compared the two drugs found them equally effective once treatment started. But there are fundamental differences in the way treatment begins, which makes these findings difficult to interpret.

Vivitrol, an injection of naltrexone that lasts 28 days, has gained a foothold among treatment providers, especially those working with the criminal justice system.

Until recently, no major study had compared it to Suboxone, a combination of buprenorphine and naloxone that is taken by mouth daily.

Now researchers have found the two medications to be equally effective at preventing relapse once patients start treatment, according to a study published Tuesday in The Lancet. A smaller, shorter study out of Norway that was published in October came to a similar conclusion.

But the Lancet study highlights a limitation for patients starting on extended-release naltrexone: Patients have to detox before receiving their first dose of Vivitrol. That requirement creates a significant barrier to beginning treatment, says Dr. Joshua Lee, associate professor at the NYU School of Medicine and lead author of the report.

“It’s going to take a few days or a week or more to get them on naltrexone in the first place,” he says. “And that detox hurdle does not exist for buprenorphine.”

Still, the research indicates that it would be advisable for treatment providers to offer both medications, he said. “Relapse rates are extremely high if you don’t get onto and continue a medication,” said Lee.

The two medications work in very different ways. Buprenorphine (like another addiction medication, methadone) is a long-acting opioid that’s taken daily. There are decades of research showing that it helps reduce cravings and prevent withdrawal symptoms.

The Lancet study looked at a combination of buprenorphine and naloxone, which reverses the effects of opioids and is designed to prevent users from injecting or snorting the medication. Naltrexone is an antagonist — it blocks receptors in the brain and prevents opioids from having any effect. Vivitrol, which is delivered as a monthly injection, was approved to treat opioid use disorder in 2010 and until recently, no studies comparing buprenorphine and Vivitrol had been published.

“We’ve had trials of each one, but not together,” said Lee. The latest study followed 570 patients from inpatient detoxification centers. They were randomly assigned to one of the drugs for six months. “Once people were on either one, they did reasonably well over time,” said Lee.

But because extended-release naltrexone can throw people into withdrawal if administered too soon after opioid use, patients must first go through detox — abstaining from drug use — which often causes debilitating flu-like symptoms for several days. More than a quarter of patients assigned to naltrexone didn’t complete detox, and most of them relapsed.

Buprenorphine treatment doesn’t require patients to go through detox. “So up front there’s a clear clinical advantage,” said Lee. “Buprenorphine products are clearly easier to use.”

Alkermes, the company that manufactures Vivitrol, has heavily marketed its flagship product to nonmedical professionals. As NPR and Side Effects reported earlier this year, the company has targeted lawmakers, judges and other criminal justice officials — people who may be ideologically opposed to using opioids to treat opioid addiction — in order to boost sales of its drug.

Given the tendency for criminal justice officials to favor non-opioid treatment options, Dr. Camila Arnaudo, an addiction psychiatrist who teaches at the Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, said she worries people will oversimplify the results of the study. “I’m a little bit concerned about headlines that I’ve already seen,” she said, many of which have indicated that the products are equally effective, leaving out the caveat that many people initially failed out of treatment with extended-release naltrexone. “I’m concerned that it’s going to lead to policies where patients are shunted into treatment with extended-release naltrexone, which is more acceptable to the criminal justice system.”

She cautions people against reading too much into any one study, and pointed again to the detox hurdle. “You’re weeding out the less committed people,” she said, potentially skewing the results in favor of extended-release naltrexone. She said some patients will do better on one drug or the other depending on the case.

“I think we can say that both are viable options for patients and they prevent opioid use,” she said. “I think what we cannot say, though, is that they’re equivalent based on this study.”

She added that some of the study authors reported receiving financial support and consulting fees from Alkermes.

Vivitrol treatment is more expensive. Each Vivitrol shot costs more than $1,200, according to Medicaid data, while a monthly supply of Suboxone can cost a few hundred dollars, depending on the dose.

Some inpatient treatment centers may also be ideologically opposed to starting someone on buprenorphine, particularly after detox, said Lee, but his study shows that it can be an effective option even starting in an inpatient setting. And in any event, relapse rates are higher among people who don’t use medications for their opioid addiction.

“Detox episodes are brief,” he said. “They don’t generally last in terms of how you look a week later.”

He added that if patients enter treatment with hopes of getting on Vivitrol but can’t make it through detox, they should be offered buprenorphine. The bottom line, he said, is that both medications should be widely available and offered to patients suffering from opioid addiction.

“We’re not doing a good enough job in this country of getting people into treatment and offering them these types of medications,” said Lee. “So were just going around undertreating the opiate epidemic.”

This story was produced in partnership with WFYI and Side Effects Public Media, a news collaborative focused on public health.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Seattle Defends Its New High-Earner Income Tax In Court

A view of the Port of Seattle and the city’s stadium district nearing dusk. On Friday, a trial court judge is scheduled to hear legal challenges to the city’s new income tax on the wealthy.

Anna Boiko-Weyrauch for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Anna Boiko-Weyrauch for NPR

Documentary filmmaker Christopher Rufo doesn’t make enough money to have to pay Seattle’s new high-earners tax, but he still wants to keep Seattle income-tax-free. So much so, he joined around 30 plaintiffs suing the city.

On Friday, a trial court judge is scheduled to hear legal challenges to the city’s new income tax on the wealthy, approved this summer by the Seattle City Council to raise revenue for services in a state that does not have an income tax.

Under the new law, the city taxes income over $250,000 a year for individuals and over $500,000 for couples at 2.25 percent. The tax is approved but isn’t being collected yet.

Rufo does not want Seattle to end up like Youngstown, Ohio, one of the cities in his upcoming PBS film on economically depressed American cities. His footage of Youngstown, playing on the screen in front of him, shows a backhoe chewing through a white two-story house, reducing it to shards within minutes.

“Pretty much the only economic activity that you’ll see in some of these neighborhoods is the demolition industry,” he says.

The message of his research is this: “We can’t take the prosperity for granted. Eventually the tech industry will either slow down, or shrink, or as we’re seeing with Amazon, move somewhere else,” Rufo says.

Amazon is considering proposals right now for a second headquarters.

Cranes poke out of the ground in Seattle’s South Lake Union neighborhood, the heart of Amazon’s headquarters.

Anna Boiko-Weyrauch for NPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Anna Boiko-Weyrauch for NPR

In enacting the income tax Seattle is going against a state Supreme Court precedent from the 1930s when the state Constitution was amended to include an extremely broad definition of property, says Republican Rob McKenna. He served two terms as Washington’s attorney general and now represents the plaintiffs in this lawsuit.

The new definition included “anything tangible or intangible, subject to ownership,” McKenna says. “The Supreme Court ruled that that definition being as broad as it is, encompasses income.”

Another clause in the state Constitution mandates all property be taxed the same, so all income must also be taxed uniformly, he says. And because state law doesn’t allow for an income tax, cities can’t impose one.

On the other side is Paul Lawrence, an attorney litigating the case on behalf of the city of Seattle.

“There’s no provision in the state Constitution that says you can’t have an income tax,” he said.

Instead, what’s preventing a state income tax is an interpretation — a wrong interpretation, Lawrence says. Because, he says, income is not property.

“It comes to you; you then take it and turn it into property — whether it’s a stock or bond or a piece of property — but it’s a very different type of thing,” he says.

And income, he says, should be allowed to be taxed under Washington state law.

Some business owners support the tax. Molly Moon’s Homemade Ice Cream chain founder and CEO, Molly Moon Neitzel, is in favor of it to fund the city’s pressing needs, like affordable housing, she says. She doesn’t earn enough to be taxed, but hopes one day to be taxed more on future high income, “so that [her] employees can have a better quality of life in the city of Seattle.”

Washington state is often said to have one of the most regressive tax structures in the nation, because of its reliance on property and sales taxes. Ideas for new taxes come out of Seattle city hall all the time.

It’s not the tax structure that keeps her business in town, Neitzel says, but rather “the community, the kinds of things people want to buy here, how beautiful it is.”

Downhill from her shop, near the shore of Lake Union, is the heart of Amazon headquarters. New office buildings and high-end condos are everywhere. And so is a question: how to respond to all this growth and all this money?

Whichever side loses initial volleys over the new tax will probably appeal it to the state’s highest court.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Russia Still Not Compliant With Sports Doping Regulations

Russia is reacting angrily after the World Anti-Doping Agency said the country is still not in compliance with its regulations. The announcement could affect Russia’s participation in the Winter Olympics next February.

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Russia’s sports programs have come under international scrutiny for illegal doping since the country hosted the Winter Olympics in Sochi in 2014, and today the World Anti-Doping Agency said Russia was still not in compliance with its regulations. NPR’s Lucian Kim reports from Moscow the ruling puts the country’s participation in the next Winter Olympics in doubt.

LUCIAN KIM, BYLINE: The president of the World Anti-Doping Agency, Sir Craig Reedie, announced the decision in Seoul, South Korea, today. He said RUSADA, as Russia’s Anti-Doping Agency is known, had failed to meet international code.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

CRAIG REEDIE: We regret that RUSADA is not yet compliant. It would be better, from our point of view, that they were.

KIM: Reedie said Russia had made huge technical improvements, but was still denying access to blood and urine samples and refusing to admit that the government had sponsored a doping program in the past. The ruling was top news in Russia, where the country’s international sporting status is an object of national pride.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: (Speaking Russian).

KIM: A well-choreographed show with a predictable ending – that’s how Russian state television described the decision. The TV news said Russia was being unfairly targeted and the victim of behind-the-scenes intrigue. Alexander Zhukov, the head of Russia’s Olympic Committee, called the ruling politicized.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

ALEXANDER ZHUKOV: (Speaking Russian).

KIM: Zhukov said it looked like artificial conditions were being invented to prevent Russia from coming into line with anti-doping rules. He denied the Russian government had ever run a doping program. The issue will dominate a meeting by the International Olympic Committee in December. That’s when the IOC will decide whether Russia should be allowed to participate in the upcoming Winter Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea. The World Anti-Doping Agency tried to get all Russian athletes kicked out of last summer’s Rio Olympics, but the IOC left it up to individual sports federations. Last week, President Vladimir Putin suggested the United States is trying to block Russia from taking part in the Olympics.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN: (Speaking Russian).

KIM: Talking to workers during a visit to a factory in Chelyabinsk, Putin said he suspected the U.S. was using the doping scandal to create problems before Russia’s presidential election in March. Putin said, the Americans imagine that Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election last year, and this is their response. Lucian Kim, NPR News, Moscow.

(SOUNDBITE OF THE XX SONG, “ISLANDS”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)