September 11, 2017

No Image

Geek Buzz: Patty Jenkins Officially Directing 'Wonder Woman 2,' Rian Johnson Not Likely Directing 'Star Wars 9'

Fans of movies about super females and other extraordinary characters, here are some updates to some highly anticipated projects:

Patty Jenkins to Direct Wonder Woman 2

Although not surprising, news that Patty Jenkins will return to helm the Wonder Woman sequel is now official, according to Variety. Jenkins, whose DC superhero movie is the second-highest grossing release of this year in the US, has already been busy writing the script for Wonder Woman 2 with Geoff Johns.

She’s signed on to earn the highest payday ever for a woman director, with her salary being somewhere around $8 million and profit points sure to make her even richer. Deservedly so! With Jenkins back with returning star Gal Gadot, we can anticipate a sequel as good as the first, possibly set in the 1980s.

Wonder Woman 2 is due for release on December 13, 2019.

Rian Johnson Not Likely to Direct Star Wars: Episode IX

In other directorial news, the vacant seat left by a departing Colin Trevorrow to helm Star Wars: Episode IX remains up in the air. Rian Johnson, who helmed the upcoming Star Wars: The Last Jedi (aka Star Wars: Episode XIII), stated in a recent Japanese press conference that he isn’t sure who will be at the helm, but probably not him. Here are his exact words, via /Film:

It was never in the plan for me to direct Episode IX, so I don’t know what’s going to happen with it…for me, I was entirely focused on Episode VIII and having this experience. Now I’m just thinking about putting the movie out there and seeing how audiences respond to it. So no, I’m not really thinking about that right now. Whoever does it, I’m going to be really excited to be an audience member again, and to sit down and see what the next filmmaker has to show us and where this story ends up going.

Just two months ago, however, Johnson did offer this hint that he wouldn’t be against coming back for more:

I would do another SW movie in a heartbeat. I’ve had the time of my life.

— Rian Johnson (@rianjohnson) July 20, 2017

Star Wars: Episode IX is currently set for release on May 24, 2019.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt Cameo in Star Wars: The Last Jedi

Speaking of Johnson, the writer-director also told Japanese press that his pal Joseph Gordon-Levitt will have some sort of cameo in the upcoming Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Gordon-Levitt, who has starred in two of Johnson’s previous features and appeared in a third, will apparently be heard rather than seen, according to ScreenCrush.

Will he be a Stormtrooper? An alien? We’ll have to wait until the movie comes out and listen closely. Another of Johnson’s pals and regular actors, Noah Segan, also has a brief role. Other non-confirmed cameos for The Last Jedi include Justin Theroux, Gareth Edwards, Tom Hardy, and Prince William and Prince Harry.

The Last Jedi opens on December 15.

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'World Without Mind': How Tech Companies Pose An Existential Threat

World Without Mind

Journalist Franklin Foer worries that we’re all losing our minds as big tech companies infiltrate every aspect of our lives.

In his new book, World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech, Foer compares the way we feel about technology now to the way people felt about pre-made foods, like TV dinners, when they were first invented.

“And we thought that they were brilliant because they did away with pots and pans — we didn’t have to go to the store to go shopping every day — and then we woke up 50 years later and realize that these products had been basically engineered to make us fat,” Foer says. “And I worry that the same thing is happening now to the things that we ingest through our mind.”


Interview Highlights

On why tech companies’ control of the market is problematic

They pose as these neutral marketplaces, yet when they have their own things to sell, they give them special advantages. We saw this with Yelp and Google, where Yelp was this great way to get recommendations about what restaurant to go to, and it used to be when you type in a restaurant name into Google, the Yelp review was the first thing that came up. Well, Google saw that this was a good business to be in and so they started to publish their own user reviews of restaurants, and suddenly, those leap-frogged over Yelp.

And so I think we accept these platforms as being neutral, they pose as neutral. Even if you look at their looks — a search engine seems like it’s a mechanical thing, but it’s not a mechanical thing. It imposes the economic interests of these companies on the platform, and it imposes their values on the platform as well.

On how tech companies’ algorithms are not impartial

All these algorithms are constructed by human beings to serve human purposes. They’re systems, and these systems are devised in order to create certain outcomes. And so the fact that they’re so invisible, I think actually enhances their power because most people have the dimmest awareness, if any awareness at all, that Facebook is being patterned to try to give them some information above others.

Right now, Facebook is obsessed with promoting video because that’s where money is to be had. So right now, Facebook is loading up your News Feed in order to give you much more video. And there are all these media companies — I bet NPR is one of them — that makes certain commitments to certain editorial processes and investments in certain editorial apparatus in order to achieve certain results on Facebook because Facebook brings a lot of traffic. It’s where users are. And then when Facebook, somewhat capriciously, decides to change its strategy, it hurts all of the organizations that are dependent upon Facebook.

Disclosure: Facebook pays NPR and other leading news organizations to produce live video streams that run on the site.

On why the threat of big tech companies is an existential one

If you’re of a certain age, you have a good appreciation for the ways in which we’ve all become a little bit cyborg. I grew up using maps and having a sense of direction, and now I have a phone. I used to try to remember numbers, and now I … can just call them up instantly. And that’s great. But what’s happening right now is that we’re in a phase of human evolution where we’re merging with machines.

It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but we’re not just merging with machines. We’ve been merging with tools since the beginning of human evolution and arguably, that’s one of the things that makes us human beings. But what we’re merging with [now] are machines that are run by companies that act as filters for the way in which we interact and process the world.

And so the values of those companies become our values. We become dependent on these companies in a way in which we’ve never really been dependent on companies before. And this could all work out in a utopian, beautiful sort of way, or it could unfold as a dystopian, sci-fi nightmare. And I just think that because the stakes are so high, we have to be extra skeptical.

On the lack of regulation to limit the influence of tech companies

The Internet was invented in an age when our entire approach to regulation has been extremely lax, and so you’d think, “OK, there might be a law on the books that governs how these corporations can handle our data.”

Well, you could kind of pull pieces of [legal] code … that shows maybe instances where companies could potentially cross boundaries, but there really isn’t a coherent approach that we have to regulating these companies, and so they have an incredible amount of freedom. …

There’s this proud American tradition of worrying about the power of communication companies. That going all the way back to the founding, we’ve tried to limit the power of monopolies that played a role in our democracy. And so even with the U.S. Postal Service to take the first communications monopoly in the United States, we didn’t let them get into the telegraph business. And when Western Union got a monopoly in the telegraph business, we were careful not to let them get into telephony.

And this extends even into our own era back up into the Clinton administration when they put pressure on Microsoft, and really hemmed them in it came to the browser. And were it not for the case that the United States brought against Microsoft, Google probably would’ve been strangled in its crib.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Sept. 11 First Responder Fights On Behalf Of Others Who Rushed To Help

Enlarge this image

Firefighters work beneath the vertical struts of the World Trade Center’s twin towers, in Lower Manhattan, following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Mark Lennihan/Associated Press

hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Lennihan/Associated Press

Following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, first responders rushed to ground zero in Manhattan, where they braved dangerous conditions to rescue people buried in the rubble, retrieve the remains of the dead and clear the debris. Among them was demolition supervisor John Feal.

Feal arrived at ground zero on Sept. 12; just five days later, he was seriously injured when an 8,000-pound piece of steel fell and crushed his foot.

He became septic from the deeply infected wound, and nearly died. The accident cost Feal half his foot — and his job. His despair grew deeper when the government denied him medical compensation for his injury.

Speaking with other first responders, Feal realized that he was not alone. Not only were others also being denied money to help pay for their injuries and illnesses, but the trauma was ruining people’s lives.

“They were losing their homes,” he says. “They were getting divorced, or separated, or their kids were in rehab for drugs because Daddy or Mommy were miserable.”

Feal formed the FealGood Foundation, which advocates on behalf of emergency personnel. He also began working to pressure Congress to pass a bill that would provide compensation for medical care and monitoring for first responders. On Dec. 22, 2010, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act was passed.

Looking back, Feal thinks about the injury he suffered at ground zero with mixed emotions: “At the time, it was devastating. It altered my life and I thought it was for the worst. But I look back now and it gives me a chance to show everybody how my mother raised me, so I’m thankful.”


Interview Highlights

On injuring his foot while working at ground zero

Roughly 8,000 pounds of steel crushed my left foot. … I jumped and I didn’t get all the way out of the way. It caught my left foot. The guy next to me fainted, because the blood was shooting out of my foot about 6 feet in the air. I made a tourniquet. … I took his belt off and I made a tourniquet below my knee.

Enlarge this image

John Feal has received recognition nationally for his work helping first responders get medical compensation and other support for the trauma, illnesses and injuries they suffered from their work related to Sept 11.

Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Tuesday’s Child

hide caption

toggle caption

Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Tuesday’s Child

Before 9/11, in my mind, I was the world’s greatest athlete and I was John Wayne. I was that cool. I didn’t think I could even be hurt — and that was a rude awakening for me, physically and mentally. But I was able to get to safety. … By that time the fire department was there and they put a towel in front of me, I was yelling at everybody to get back to work — “I’ll be back in an hour,” you know — and it was a very humbling experience.

On remembering the moment the steel beam hit his foot

I can block out my injury. I can block out my five days there [at ground zero]. I can’t block out the smell. Probably why I don’t sleep enough. When I close my eyes, I can smell ground zero. Everybody always asks what [did] it smell like? There’s not a word invented yet that describes the smell of ground zero. … It’s a smell that I’ve never smelled before or [since]. It’s a smell of destruction, devastation, carnage. It was everything combined in one that created the smell.

It’s not just me saying this. This is other 9/11 responders and first responders or volunteers who will say the same thing. Especially this time of the year, when I shut my eyes, that smell comes back and it’s like it’s putting its hand over my mouth and nose, and it gets tough.

On the reoccurring nightmare he had after Sept. 11

This time of the year, this anniversary … it’s tough. Not just for me — it’s tough for all 9/11 responders and volunteers and survivors and people who lived and worked down in ground zero. They call these “scars” — they’re not scars, they’re scabs, and these scabs get pulled right off round this time of the year. It’s tough.

You know, when I was going to therapy back in 2002 and ’03 and ’04 and ’05, I had these same recurring nightmares … where I would see the plane crash; and one day I’d be sitting on a park bench with my dog, the plane would be driving by and I couldn’t do anything. Then it was personal. The next day I’m sitting on the park bench with my dog and I would see my mother in the window of the plane waving. Then, little by little, after doing therapy, I was able to get off the park bench and get up and, like Superman, stop the plane from crashing into the building.

On how he became an activist, working to get medical compensation for Sept. 11 first responders

When I was not only going for individual counseling, right after Sept. 11 … I started going to support groups and I started meeting other 9/11 responders. …

And then I was telling people about my experience on workmen’s comp or social security, and I started helping them. And I started going to their hearings. And then, the next thing you know, I started taking other Sept. 11 responders to somebody else’s hearings, and then the judges and the lawyers were like, “Oh here comes Feal, with his crew!”

I look back and it was primitive, but it was effective. Again, at the end of the day I don’t apologize or second guess myself, because we’re talking about human life. We’re talking about human beings who are trying to put food on their table for their kids, or pay their utilities, or put gas in their car to get to a chemotherapy appointment. So it didn’t matter what elected official or what lawyer or what judge or what doctor I pissed off, because the only thing I care about at the end of the day is helping people.

On how going to so many funerals has shaped his thoughts on death

I’m not so much into all that biblical religious stuff, but I do believe there’s a God. I believe we’re here for a purpose, and I believe when we leave there’s also a purpose. I think our energy goes to other people and our energy continues. I’m not afraid of dying, no. Listen … I went to therapy when I wanted to kill myself after getting out of the hospital; those thoughts creep up. I do have my bad days. Would I do it? No. Am I strong enough to stop myself? Yes. But I am not afraid to die, and there are times where I wish I would have died instead of a friend or somebody who left behind four kids. I begged God — my God totake me instead of them.

On the importance of remembering the sacrifice of first responders

Most people think on this anniversary that two buildings came down that day and 2,753 innocent lives were lost [in New York City]. … But since then, about 2,000 [more] people have died because of their illnesses. They, too, are heroes. And in many ways — I talk to a lot of them — they wish they would have died that day, because what they have had to go through and fight, not only their illnesses but the bureaucracy and the poor leadership, and to see their other friends pass away from Sept. 11-related illnesses. These men and women have been through the ringer, through the mill. …

We call ourselves the greatest nation in the world. But yet we have a strange way of repeating history, and letting veterans come home from war, or 9/11 responders, or just responders now across the nation, how they sacrifice themselves and then we don’t take care of them. That’s sad.

Amy Salit and Thea Chaloner produced and edited the audio of this interview. Bridget Bentz and Molly Seavy-Nesper adapted it for the Web.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)