August 26, 2017

No Image

Mayweather And McGregor Set To Meet For Blockbuster Boxing Fight

Floyd Mayweather and Conor McGregor meet in the ring Saturday night. The two fighters may have near flawless fighting records, but they’re facing heat for provocative comments.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Let’s switch gears for a minute and talk about fight night. That is tonight. World champion Floyd Mayweather, undefeated in his professional career, is taking on UFC reigning lightweight fighter Conor McGregor. They square off tonight in a live pay-per-view special that has been hyped for months by fans and the fighters. And it’s also put off at least some would-be fans because of the pre-show antics. McGregor has been making statements against Mayweather that a lot of people consider racist, such as telling his opponent to dance for me, boy. And Mayweather has tossed anti-gay slurs back at McGregor, not to mention Mayweather’s whole history with domestic violence.

With all of that, maybe because of that, the fight is turning out to be the most lucrative in boxing history, with estimates of $300 to $500 million in revenue. But we have questions – well, one really – why? Why so much attention? Why so much money? So we called up Gautham Nagesh. He runs a boxing news website, Stiff Jab. And he’s been covering the sport for almost a decade now. Gautham, welcome. Thanks so much for joining us once again.

GAUTHAM NAGESH: Thanks for having me.

MARTIN: So why? Why all the hype? Why so much money? Is this even really a boxing match?

NAGESH: Well, in theory, it is a boxing match because it’s going to take place under boxing rules tonight. Even though Conor McGregor is mostly famous for being a mixed martial artist, he has agreed to become a boxer for one fight, at least, in order to get a chance at Floyd Mayweather, the sport’s biggest star. And UFC has sort of overtaken boxing in the public consciousness in many aspects. One aspect where it hasn’t is in the amount of money the fighters get paid. And so Conor McGregor is the biggest star in the UFC, but he only makes a fraction of the money that Floyd Mayweather makes, hence the appeal of coming over to boxing and fighting Floyd.

MARTIN: So let’s talk about the trash talk because, you know, trash talk is a part of a lot of sports. It’s certainly a part of boxing. I mean, Muhammad Ali was, you know, an artist at this. But the things these men seem to be saying has really turned off a lot of people, even a lot of sportswriters, I mean, the racial slurs, the homophobic slurs. What’s your take on this as a person who’s in the sport – follows it closely?

NAGESH: Well, I think certainly it’s been ugly at times. Conor McGregor’s comments, I think, in – perhaps at the New York press conference where he said he was black below his waist, I think that’s completely out of line. Some of the things that were said about female fans. And then, of course, Floyd has this very long, clear record of domestic violence. And so understandably, there are a lot of people who are put off by this behavior.

I think, just as a reporter, it’s fair to say that while a large portion of the public finds it reprehensible, the sorts of people who buy pay-per-view fights, I think, expect some degree of unsavory aspects to the people who fight, whether or not that’s true. In my experience, it isn’t. Boxers are generally some of the most decent people I’ve ever met. But boxing, as I’ve said before, is not necessarily the occupation that anyone, including boxers, would pick for their children. I mean, when you really step back – again, we are watching men who are paid to fight each other and risk death for the entertainment of the public.

MARTIN: Is there any sense within the boxing world that this degrades the sport? I mean, boxing is an Olympic sport. And is there any sense in which this degrades it? What do you think?

NAGESH: I think there are many people who feel that way. I think it’s fair to feel that way. Larry Merchant used to always say that nothing can destroy boxing and nothing can save it. Boxing has seen much worse things – fixed fights, tournaments broadcast on TV that turned out to be shambolic, you know, gambling rituals. This is hardly the worst thing that’s happened in boxing. With that said, if Conor McGregor were to somehow beat Floyd Mayweather tonight, that might be the worst possible thing that could happen for boxing because it would render the sport, in some ways, irrelevant.

MARTIN: That was Gautham Nagesh, founder of the boxing website Stiff Jab. We reached him in Detroit. Gautham, thanks so much for joining us.

NAGESH: Thanks for having me.

(SOUNDBITE OF LAMB OF GOD’S “ASHES OF THE WAKE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

First 'It' Reactions: Could This Be One of the Best Stephen King Adaptations of All Time?

The social media embargo for Stephen King’s It lifted last night, releasing the first wave of critics’ reactions into the world. While nobody has reviewed the movie in full yet, we’ve got a consensus on the horror adaptation and it’s quite positive. Sounds like not just the scariest movie of the year but maybe a horror classic?

Could this be one of the most acclaimed King adaptations when the reviews do drop? Currently, the top title is the 1976 version of Carrie, which has a 93% on Rotten Tomatoes. That’s followed by non-horror movies Stand By Me (91%) and The Shawshank Redemption (91%) then 1983’s The Dead Zone (90%) and Misery (89%) rounding up the first five (see the rest of the rankings here).

Here are some of the praise for It via Twitter:

It is everything I hoped for and more. Has heart, laughs and TONS of incredible scares. Fell in love with the Losers. Didn’t want it to end.” – Perri Nemiroff, Collider

“Just saw It. Really well done. Cast were all great with some twisted visuals. Going to make a ton of money. Ready for the sequel tomorrow.” – Steven “Frosty” Weintraub, Collider

“Saw It. I loved it. Then took trash out in my empty, dark, stairwell…SH*T FREAKED ME OUT CAUSE THAT MOVIE SCARED ME LIKE FOR REAL.” – Mark E. Reilly, Collider

“I love It. It’s everything I wanted. Scary as sh*t, Skarsgard nails Pennywise, and the Losers are perfection.” – Haleigh Foutch, Collider

“Thrilled I can now say that It is spectacular. Totally terrifying, but also amazing fun (the Losers are PERFECT). Top 10 candidate for me.” – Eric Eisenberg, Cinema Blend

“LOVED It. Captured the spirit of the book & still created something new. Perfect combo of dark and fun. And the Losers Club was PERFECT!” – Rachel Heine, Nerdist

It was spooktacular. Great cast, surprisingly funny, and genuinely unnerving scares. You’ll still be freaked out when you get home.” – Dan Casey, Nerdist

“Just finished watching It. Wow! Incredible! Scared me sh*tless!” – Rama’s Screen

“I can finally talk about It. New adaptation is more fun, frightening and familiar than you think.” – Mara Reinstein, Mara Movies

“I liked it! Kids are great. BSkars is great. Also, surprisingly, it’s pretty dang funny.” – Rebecca Pahle, Film Journal

It was terrifying and hilarious and delightful, so we’re deciding to see how this thing goes.” – Terri Schwartz, IGN

“I can say I saw It tonight. And it was great. Cast is excellent. And, yes, [Pennywise] is scary! This will be a, ahem, monster at the box office.” – Jim Vejvoda, IGN

“Happy to say It is an effectively scary and faithful adaptation of (half) of Stephen King’s novel. Walked out very satisfied.” – Eric Walkuski, Arrow in the Head

“Saw It and it’s definitely the best horror movie of the year imo (yes, better than Get Out). Screening erupted into a standing ovation.” – Kurt Smejkal, Three Angry Nerds

It definitely captures frights of the novel whilst adding new fears. Major set pieces are bone-chilling — even summons a splash of tears.” – Courtney Howard, Fresh Fiction

It makes me nostalgic for when I used to get scared by things, because I don’t anymore. But man oh man, if you still do…” – Fred Topel, We Live Entertainment

It: a carnival funhouse of a film; loud, scary, funny. And best of all: it has heart.” – Chris Evangelista, CutPrintFilm

“Can’t post specifics yet but It is GOOD.” – Mike Rougeau, Game Spot

“Bill Skarsgard is putting in a performance that is going to turn him into the Freddy Krueger of a new generation. The amount of violence and horrific imagery in regards to children is SHOCKING. They didn’t hold back. It’s great.” – Drew Dietch, Fandom

Looks like we should at least have a score in the 90s here, folks! Watch the trailer once again below and see the movie when it opens on September 8.

[embedded content]

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What's Making These Dogs In Mumbai Turn Blue?

One of the stray dogs that turned blue hangs out on a street in the Taloja industrial zone in Mumbai.

AFP/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

AFP/Getty Images

Five dogs turned blue in Mumbai.

That was a story that journalist Deepak Gharat broke this past week. He was following up on a story in the industrial zone of Taloja, home to about 1,000 pharmaceutical and chemical factories. Every week, there’s something going wrong over there, he says. Industrial waste catches fire. Dead fish float up to the surface of the local river en masse.

Last week, he noticed a canine of unusual hue snoozing under a truck. Unable to believe his eyes, he took pictures and mailed them to his newsroom.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Puddles for the pooches

Some people, like local animal rights activist Arati Chauhan, suggested the dogs turned blue because of waste in the local Kasardi River, where the dogs were thought to have gone wading.

That theory appeared in many media outlets but does not appear to be true. The dogs hang out at a pigment and detergent factory about 2 miles away from the river, and they’re too territorial to venture that far, says Gharat.

“The dogs go looking for food in the dye factory compound,” Gharat found.

Locals have seen the dogs crawling on their bellies under the factory’s gate to loll in the ubiquitous puddles of cool, blue water in the grounds.

So they’re definitely not swimming in the river and instead are picking it up from the dye in the stagnant water on the factory grounds, Gharat observed.

Gharat confirmed with a local vet that the dye on their fur had dried to leave behind a powdery, blue residue.

While the dye isn’t permanent, it’s toxic to the dogs, who lick their fur to groom themselves and end up ingesting the chemical.

The dogs are lucky it’s monsoon season, because the dye washes off after several rainy rinses. After activist Chauhan and her organization, the Navi Mumbai Animal Protection Cell, filed a complaint, the local chapter of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals checked the dogs, including one with an eye infection. All the animals have been given a clean bill of health, and the dye has been scrubbed off. The factory has put up a temporary net under the gate to prevent dogs from getting back in.

Not fine for fish

So the problem with the dogs was apparently cosmetic. But the media attention pushed the state pollution control board to shut down the chemical factory, identified as Ducol Organics & Colours Pvt Ltd. The factory was releasing untreated chemicals into the river and toxic residual dye powder into the atmosphere, violating India’s Water Act from 1974 and the Air Act from 1981.

That’s not a problem for dogs, because they don’t appear to drink from the river. But it is a problem for fish.

Last year, local fishermen complained that their catch volumes had dropped by 90 percent. They had the water tested at the municipal environment laboratory. Measured against guidelines from the Central Pollution Control Board, a national regulatory body, the pollution in the Kasardi River was 13 times over the safe limit for fish to survive, and 40 times over the limit for human consumption.

At the source of the Kasardi River, 24 miles away, the water is used for agriculture, drinking and washing clothes, says Gharat. “But where the industrial zone starts in Mumbai, the water is totally chemical.”

Factories were set up in this area in the 1960s, he says, and more than 300 of them make chemicals.

‘Successfully polluted’

V.M. Balsaraf, a professor of applied chemistry at the Datta Meghe College of Engineering and a researcher of groundwater pollution in Mumbai, is surprised at the sudden brouhaha over the river pollution. “We have found heavy metals and chemicals in the area water. Most of the industries don’t have treatment for sewage,” he says. “All our water sources are successfully polluted, they’ve become gutters. Even birds and animals have nowhere to drink water.”

Chauhan, the activist, has asked the pollution board to plant more trees, clean up the river and stop the dumping of untreated waste in the area.

Shutting down the factory, though, is shortsighted, she says. It would be better to hold all the factories accountable rather than depriving some workers a livelihood, she suggests.

“People are saying just implement the law, get the pollution under control,” echoes Gharat, who says that fixing the treatment plant, monitoring waste discharge and punishing offenders would be a good place to start.

But he and the activists are afraid that official action will taper off once the memory of the blue dogs fades away.


Chhavi Sachdev is a journalist based in Mumbai. Contact her @chhavi

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

The Week in Movie News: Here's What You Need to Know

Need a quick recap on the past week in movie news? Here are the highlights:

BIG NEWS

Multiple Joker movies announced: Martin Scorsese will produce a hard-boiled crime film tracking the origins of Batman villain The Joker, while another movie will reunite Jared Leto’s Joker and Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn for a “criminal love story.” Read more here and here. Also check out what critics are saying about the first idea here and see some dream casting here and here.

EXCITING NEWS

Details on the Unbreakable sequel: M. Night Shymalan’s next movie is Glass, a sequel to Unbreakable and Split. Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy will star; it has a more “epic” plot than its predecessors. This week we got a basic synopsis, which you can read here.

UNSURPRISING NEWS

Channing Tatum is still Gambit: If you’re still hopeful about Channing Tatum starring in a Gambit movie, he’s got good news: it’s still going to happen. Of course, the X-Men spin-off is recalibrating now following the success of Deadpool and Logan. Read more here.

COOL CULTURE

Taking advantage of the eclipse: Filmmakers shot a short Western during Monday’s solar eclipse and broadcast it live online. You can watch the result here:

MUST-WATCH TRAILERS

Last Flag Flying looks funny and poignant: The first trailer for Richard Linklater’s Last Flag Flying, a sort of sequel to the classic 1973 drama The Last Detail, has arrived with strong chemistry between stars Steve Carell, Bryan Cranston and Laurence Fishburne. Watch it below.

[embedded content]

Little Evil spoofs a horror trope: Adam Scott is Satan’s new stepfather in Little Evil, a comedic take on movies like The Omen. Check out its first trailer here:

[embedded content]

Suburbicon is full of wonder and excitement: George Clooney’s Coen Brothers-scripted comedy has a new international trailer with more ridiculous moments from Matt Damon, Julianne Moore and Oscar Isaac. Watch it here:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)