August 25, 2017

No Image

Four Steps That Could Cut Health Insurance Premiums And Boost Enrollment

The Senate health committee meets next month to discuss ways to stabilize the insurance markets. Insurers have until Sept. 27 to commit to selling policies on the ACA marketplaces in 2018.

Andrew Harnik/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/AP

Congress and the Trump administration could boost insurance coverage by a couple of million people and lower premiums by taking a few actions to stabilize the Affordable Care Act insurance markets, according to a new analysis by the consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

The paper, which lays out a simple blueprint for making insurance more affordable for more people while working within the current health law’s structure, comes just days before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee begins hearings on ways to stabilize markets in the short term.

“Together, these approaches could increase enrollment by roughly two million individuals, reduce average premiums by more than 20 percent and be roughly revenue neutral,” the analysis by Kurt Giesa and Peter Kaczmarek says.

The analysis concludes that under current law, about 17 million people will buy insurance in the individual market next year, many of them outside the ACA marketplaces. If the four actions outlined in the paper are implemented, about 19 million people would buy individual insurance, the study finds.

At the same time, the average monthly premium would fall from $486 to $384.

Some of the actions, including extending the Affordable Care Act’s cost-sharing subsidies, are already on the table for next month’s committee hearings.

These are the four steps that Oliver Wyman recommends to stabilize Obamacare.

1. Fund the cost-sharing reduction payments for the long term

These are payments the government makes to insurance companies as reimbursement for discounts on copayments and deductibles the companies are required by law to give to low-income customers. President Trump has said he wants to end the payments — which a court has ruled are unlawful since Congress never authorized them. But now lawmakers, including Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the health committee, say they want Congress to fund the payments through next year.

“State insurance commissioners have warned that abrupt cancellation of cost-sharing subsidies would cause premiums, copays and deductibles to increase and more insurance companies to leave the markets in 2018,” Alexander said in a statement on Aug. 16. “Congress now should pass balanced, bipartisan, limited legislation in September that will fund cost-sharing payments for 2018.”

2. Create a reinsurance program

The ACA included a temporary reinsurance program that protected insurance companies from huge losses while they transitioned to the new market under the new law.

Senate Republicans included a reinsurance program in the Better Care Reconciliation Act, the health care overhaul that failed earlier this summer.

Govs. John Hickenlooper of Colorado and John Kasich of Ohio are publicly advocating such a program.

“Top of our list would be this notion of having some sort of reinsurance to make sure the high-cost pool is not causing higher rates for all,” Hickenlooper said in an interview with Colorado Public Radio.

3. Strongly enforce the individual mandate

President Trump has suggested he doesn’t want the Internal Revenue Service to enforce Obamacare’s requirement that every person have insurance. Today, individuals who can’t prove they have coverage must pay a fine of $695 or more. Oliver Wyman’s analysis shows that if the mandate isn’t enforced, many young healthy people would drop their coverage.

“As younger and healthier people opt out of the market, the cost of coverage would increase, and market-average premiums would increase in parallel,” the study said.

4. Get rid of the health insurance tax

Obamacare includes a tax on health insurance companies to help offset the costs of federal subsidies that help people buy policies on the ACA markets. It was in place from 2014 through 2016, but then Congress passed a moratorium on the levy for this year. Insurance companies are lobbying hard to ensure it doesn’t return next year. Oliver Wyman’s analysis shows that continuing that moratorium would cut premiums by about 3 percent next year.

Insurance companies have until Sept. 27 to commit to selling policies on the ACA marketplaces in 2018. Alexander says he wants some legislation to pass before then to help stabilize the markets and cut premiums.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Racial Conflict Draws Boxing Fans To Mayweather-McGregor Fight

Almost everyone agrees that the much-hyped boxing match between Floyd Mayweather and MMA champ Conor McGregor will not be much of a fight. But fans will shell out an estimated half a billion dollars to watch. NPR’s Robert Siegel talks with sports columnist Adam Kilgore of The Washington Post about the fight.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Two summers ago, a mixed martial arts champion named Conor McGregor was doing an interview with Conan O’Brien.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

CONAN O’BRIEN: What if you were in the ring with Floyd Mayweather? What do you think would happen? He’s obviously an incredibly – one of the greatest boxers anyone’s ever seen…

CONOR MCGREGOR: If you’re asking would I like to fight Floyd, I mean, who would not like to dance around the ring for $180 million?

O’BRIEN: Yeah.

(LAUGHTER, APPLAUSE)

SIEGEL: And the trash talk has been going on ever since.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

FLOYD MAYWEATHER: I’m not the same fighter I was 10 years ago. I’m not the same fighter I was five years ago. I’m not the same fighter I was two years ago. But I got enough to beat you.

SIEGEL: Well, now this spectacle of a matchup is actually happening. Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Conor McGregor will box Saturday night in Las Vegas and on Showtime pay-per-view. As sports columnist Adam Kilgore of The Washington Post has written, the racial difference between the two has been a selling point for this fight. Are there any other selling points?

Adam Kilgore, thanks for joining us today.

ADAM KILGORE: Thanks for having me.

SIEGEL: And first, tell us about the two fighters, starting with the 40-year-old Floyd Mayweather.

KILGORE: Floyd Mayweather is regarded as one of the greatest tactical fighters in boxing history. Outside of the ring he’s known for controversy. He’s twice been convicted of battery against women. And he has this sort of almost like pathological obsession with money. Is his nickname is Money. He has a lot of business interests outside of boxing, including a strip club in Las Vegas. So he’s quite a, you know, only-in-boxing character.

SIEGEL: OK. And in the other corner 29-year-old Conor McGregor.

KILGORE: Conor McGregor comes from a poor part of Dublin, Ireland, called Crumlin. He’s an incredible showman. He’s got an incredible left hook that’s taken him to the top of mixed martial arts in a promotion called UFC, Ultimate Fighting Championship. He trained as a boxer as a teenager. But, you know, as far as the highest level of the sport is concerned, he’s never boxed before. And no one really knows if he can box.

SIEGEL: Now, McGregor, as a mixed martial artist, can kick, grab, trip, wrestle. In a boxing match, all he’s allowed to do is punch above the belt. Does he have a prayer against Mayweather?

KILGORE: Conor McGregor has the proverbial almost definition of a puncher’s chance. There is a school of thought that if he comes out and just throws haymakers and is very aggressive early on, he has a prayer to connect and maybe knock Mayweather down. The problem is Mayweather’s been knocked down once in his entire career. And most boxing analysts – and I would agree with these folks – think that he’s not going to get a clean shot if he gets a shot at all.

SIEGEL: Now, you’ve written about the race angle in this fight. As the famed fight promoter Don King once said, if it’s a fight between a white boxer and a black boxer, you can play the race card tremendously and get an overwhelming return. Is that what’s selling this fight?

KILGORE: I think that’s part of what’s selling the fight. I do think that novelty is the primary selling point. But certainly the fighters have not shied away from using race as a selling point. In one of the first tour stops, McGregor twice told Floyd Mayweather…

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MCGREGOR: Dance for me, boy. Dance for me, sir. Dance for me.

KILGORE: In a subsequent tour stop, after there had been, you know, a bit of an uproar about those comments, McGregor said that he could not be racist because he was half-black from the bellybutton down, implying exactly what you think he’s implying there. Certainly boxing has a long tradition of promoting fights along racial lines, and both Mayweather and McGregor have sort of used that tactic.

SIEGEL: Adam Kilgore is a national sports columnist for The Washington Post. Thanks for talking with us.

KILGORE: Thank you.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Advertising Giant WPP Faces Slow Growth As Companies Cut Ad Spending

The world’s largest advertising company, WPP, is sometimes viewed as a bellwether for the health of the global economy. This week, it jolted the ad and media industries when it slashed the forecast for its own growth this year. WPP has blamed the unexpectedly steep decline in ad spending by some of the most influential consumer goods companies.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

WPP is the world’s largest advertising company. It’s sometimes called an economic bellwether because it works with huge corporations like Procter & Gamble, Ford and Nestle. NPR’s Alina Selyukh reports that the British ad company is facing some surprisingly bad news.

ALINA SELYUKH, BYLINE: In the advertising world, WPP is a behemoth. It owns hundreds of ad agencies. Think classic Madison Avenue. Their clients are the who’s who of the Fortune Global 500. They sell all kinds of things – shampoo, mayonnaise, cars. And this reach has made WPP something of a proxy for the health of the world’s largest corporations.

BRIAN WIESER: They have some of the most insightful earnings releases of any – certainly any company I cover.

SELYUKH: Brian Wieser is a senior analyst at equity research company Pivotal.

WIESER: They have the most diverse assortment of marketers as clients across many different industries. And so they will have a better read certainly on the large marketers’ and large companies’ spending habits than anyone else.

SELYUKH: And this week, this read on ad spending habits was particularly pessimistic. Going into 2017, WPP was reasonably optimistic about revenue growth this year. Now the advertising powerhouse says it may not see any growth at all.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MARTIN SORRELL: We started the year really around 3 percent. Then we moved down to 2 percent. And now we’re talking between 0 and 1 percent.

SELYUKH: That’s the CEO, Sir Martin Sorrell. He’s often described as the most powerful man in advertising. And this week on the earnings webcast, he blamed the decline in ad spending on cutbacks by the big consumer goods companies.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

SORRELL: The three key factors here were a trifecta of digital disruption, zero-based budgeting and activist investors.

SELYUKH: OK, to peel that back in the simplest terms, he’s saying the Internet is shaking up advertising, companies are cutting costs, and some shareholders are pushing for better profits. But let’s dig in a bit into the digital disruption.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Gillette, the best a man can get.

SELYUKH: Take Procter & Gamble. They own huge brands like Gillette, Febreze, Crest, Pampers. And P&G has been slashing ad spending, especially calling out digital ads, saying they want real humans, not fake Internet bots, seeing their ads. And they don’t want their ads next to, quote, “objectionable content.” But more fundamentally, the stalwarts in consumer goods have been facing competition from Internet-powered newcomers.

WIESER: It is maybe best described as Gillette losing share to Dollar Shave Club.

SELYUKH: That’s a startup that sells razors, now a part of Unilever.

WIESER: And in every category, you could probably find a similar example.

SELYUKH: The new online rivals think differently about advertising – maybe talk to consumers directly or pay a YouTube star to plug your brand. That means the advertising giants like WPP are themselves rethinking how they work. And some analysts say maybe they aren’t good economic bellwethers after all. Alina Selyukh, NPR News.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)