July 31, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Batman vs. The Punisher, Darth Vader vs. Picard, the History of Title Sequences and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup Battle of the Day:

Using some special effects and clips from The Accountant, Stryder HD made a fan trailer for the dream DCEU/MCU crossover Batman v The Punisher:

[embedded content]

Mashup Hangout of the Day:

Star Wars meets Star Trek meets Guardians of the Galaxy when action figures of Darth Vader, Captain Jean-Luc Picard and Groot get together in this Nerdist parody:

[embedded content]

Mashup Trailer of the Day:

Smart Aleck Comedy recut the trailer for An Inconvenient Sequel with footage from the old Captain Planet cartoon:

[embedded content]

Lego Build of the Day:

Watch a time-lapse video of official Lego master builders putting together a statue of Thor from Thor: Ragnarok (via Geek Tyrant):

Supercut of the Day:

Burger Fiction teamed up with CatVideos.com for this supercut of the best cats in movies ever:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Michael Biehn, who turns 61 today, and Sigourney Weaver receive direction from James Cameron on the set of Aliens:

Filmmaker in Focus:

The symmetry and other geometric artistry of Nicholas Winding Refn’s movies is showcased in this supercut from Alessandro Tranchini:

[embedded content]

Film History of the Day:

Filmmaker IQ’s John Hess presents a history of the movie title sequence, including openings and post-credits scenes:

[embedded content]

Movie Trivia of the Day:

Today is the 30th anniversary of the release of The Lost Boys, so here’s CineFix with seven things you probably don’t know about the movie:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is also the 25th anniversary of the release of the Robert Zemeckis-helmed Death Becomes Her starring Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn. Watch the original trailer for the effects-driven comedy below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Fan Blamed For Chicago Cubs' Loss Gets His Own World Series Ring

On Monday the Chicago Cubs gave a 2016 World Series championship ring to Steve Bartman, a fan blamed for a team loss in 2003.

AP

hide caption

toggle caption

AP

A year after the Chicago Cubs won their first World Series title in more than a century, a long-suffering fan is getting another reward.

Steve Bartman was handed a personalized 2016 World Series ring, after being blamed for costing the team the title 13 years earlier.

It began with a simple gesture, perhaps an instinctive one on Oct. 14, 2003. The Cubs were ahead, 3-0, in Game 6 of the National League Championship Series against the Marlins in the eighth inning. A foul ball headed Bartman’s way. He — and other fans — reached out for it, but it was Bartman who deflected it from the outstretched mitt of left fielder Moises Alou.

Watch the move in the video below.

[embedded content]
YouTube

The Marlins wound up scoring eight runs in the remainder of the inning. They won the game, then the series.

The umpire determined it was fair game on Bartman’s part because he didn’t reach beyond the stands. It would have counted as interference if he had extended his arm out over the field, which would have resulted in the ball being declared dead, according to major league rules.

No one can say how things would have gone if Bartman hadn’t touched the ball. But angry Cubs fans didn’t care. Bartman had to be hidden inside the stadium after some started hurling abuse at him. Then he had to wear a disguise before being escorted out of Wrigley Field, reportsThe New York Times.

He stayed out of the public eye for the next 14 years. A friend and spokesman told CNN in 2016 that Bartman had been offered book proposals and hefty sums for a commercial, but he turned them all down. And he continued to receive threats, according his spokesman.

On Monday, Barton came to the office of Cubs owner Tom Ricketts to receive the ring, reports WGN-TV.

“We hope this provides closure on an unfortunate chapter of the story that has perpetuated throughout our quest to win a long-awaited World Series,” the team said in a statement. “While no gesture can fully lift the public burden he has endured for more than a decade, we felt it was important Steve knows he has been and continues to be fully embraced by this organization.”

If Steve Bartman is happy about this and feels satisfied, and gets closure, then it’s all good by me. https://t.co/zAx4S7fLZ5

— Brett Taylor (@BleacherNation) July 31, 2017

And now Bartman has spoken out. “Although I do not consider myself worthy of such an honor, I am deeply moved and sincerely grateful to receive an official Chicago Cubs 2016 World Series Championship ring,” he said in a statement. “I am fully aware of the historical significance and appreciate the symbolism the ring represents on multiple levels.”

Bartman did nothing wrong, and NEVER exploited his infamy. Cheers to him. Now leave him alone, forever https://t.co/oAhataLtD7

— JustNotSports (@JustNotSports) July 31, 2017

The reaction on Twitter appeared to be mostly positive, with fans applauding the move.

“I am happy to be reunited with the Cubs family and positively moving forward with my life,” Bartman said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

HBO Says It Was Hacked, Some Programming Stolen

Hackers claim to have stolen information related to HBO’s Game of Thrones, allegedly including written material from an upcoming episode. HBO has confirmed a hack occurred, but not what information was acquired. Here, Samwell Tarly (John Bradley) sits with some written material of his own.

Helen Sloan/courtesy of HBO

hide caption

toggle caption

Helen Sloan/courtesy of HBO

HBO says it has been hacked, and that the perpetrators have acquired some programming.

The premium cable channel won’t confirm what materials were acquired in the cyber breach. But the alleged perpetrators claim to have acquired text related to the popular — and famously spoiler-plagued — Game of Thrones.

Entertainment Weeklybroke the story:

“Hackers claimed to have obtained 1.5 terabytes of data from the company. So far, an upcoming episode of Ballers and Room 104 have apparently been put online. There is also written material that’s allegedly from next week’s fourth episode of Game of Thrones. More is promised to be ‘coming soon.’ “

It’s not clear if the hackers do actually have any Game of Thrones material, EW says.

NPR’s Eric Deggans reports:

” HBO is so secretive about spoilers involving its hit series Game of Thrones, journalists weren’t even given advance copies of new episodes before the new season began July 16.

“Now HBO has acknowledged that a ‘cyber incident’ resulted in stolen proprietary information, including some programming. … HBO says it is working with law enforcement and cybersecurity firms to investigate the breach.”

HBO has had material prematurely leaked online — including screeners, clips from overseas distributors and a Game of Thrones trailer, EW writes. But none of those incidents involved hacking.

“Hacking Hollywood can have significant repercussions,” The Associated Press notes. “Sony struggled in the aftermath of its huge hack in 2014, which leaked employee emails as well as films.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Future Of The Affordable Care Act Remains Uncertain

Sarah Kliff of Vox talks with NPR’s Audie Cornish about ways the executive branch can undermine the Affordable Care Act, after the Senate failed to pass legislation repealing the health care law.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Over the weekend, President Trump tweeted, if a new health care bill is not approved quickly, bailouts for insurance companies and bailouts for members of Congress will end very soon. That’s a threat to end subsidies that benefit low-income Americans who are insured through the Affordable Care Act. It’s also a threat to end subsidies specific to health plans for members of Congress. Now this tweet, among others, adds more uncertainty about the future of the Affordable Care Act after Friday’s failure to repeal and replace it.

Joining me now is Sarah Kliff. She’s a senior health care policy correspondent for Vox. Welcome to the program.

SARAH KLIFF: Thank you for having me.

CORNISH: Let’s start out with that term bailouts, the payments that the president is threatening to withhold. Tell us more about what he’s talking about and whether he could actually do what he’s threatening.

KLIFF: Yeah, so he’s talking about two things. And I’ll tackle the one for insurance companies first, and then we can go from there. So he is talking about these funds that we call cost-sharing reduction payments. This is about $8 billion that the federal government sends to insurance companies to offset the copays and deductibles that low-income patients on the Obamacare marketplaces have.

What the Trump administration is threatening to do and what they could do is say they are going to stop paying those cost-sharing reduction subsidies. That would cause a lot of chaos in the marketplaces. Experts estimate that premiums would rise 15 to 20 percent if that fund went away.

CORNISH: Now, President Trump regularly talks about letting the Affordable Care Act, quote, unquote, “implode.” In the meantime, what are the actions the Trump administration has already taken that could effectively undermine the law? What’s happened since he’s taken office?

KLIFF: A lot of it is just the uncertainty about how he is going to manage the Affordable Care Act. And for insurance companies, they don’t like uncertainty. Insurance companies love to know exactly what they’re pricing for, who’s going to sign up, how much their medical bills are going to be. So you know, it isn’t necessarily the case that they’ve put out specific policies to damage the Affordable Care Act. It’s mostly they don’t make clear what their policy positions are. And that’s actually quite damaging in itself.

CORNISH: But Democrats look at things they’re doing like saying withholding the advertising – right? – so people don’t know kind of when and where to sign up and say, look; that’s an example of sabotage.

KLIFF: Yeah, that’s a good point. You certainly do see some ads being pulled off the air in January. Just last week, the Trump administration cut off a grant to 18 cities to do enrollment work. So you’re seeing some small amounts of that. But we’ll really get a big test when we get into open enrollment in November and see, you know, is the Trump administration letting people know about open enrollment? Is it easy to get through to the call center? Are there lots of people staffing it? Or are there long waits? These are all kind of small, practical details, but they really add up in terms of whether people get health insurance or not.

CORNISH: So far, has there been an actual effect, right? Like, what has been the result of the actions they have taken?

KLIFF: So we did see enrollment go down a little bit at the end of the open enrollment season this year. This was just a few weeks after the Trump administration came into office. It’s hard to know how much of that was related to specific actions they took, but it is certainly true that we saw enrollment dip a little bit. And this is after some of the advertising was pulled. The other place we’re seeing it right now are where insurance companies say, our premiums are higher because of the way the Trump administration is managing the Affordable Care Act.

CORNISH: Let’s say we hear Republicans and Democrats are working together in a bipartisan way to improve the Affordable Care Act. In another part of the program, we’re actually talking to some House lawmakers trying to do that. Are there some obvious fixes?

KLIFF: Yeah, there certainly are, and they’re being talked about on Capitol Hill right now. One of the biggest is requiring the payment of those cost-sharing reduction subsidies, writing it into law that this money exists, that it goes to insurance companies.

The other thing that comes up that, you know, insurance companies really want is some kind of fund to offset their really expensive patient so that when they get someone with a million dollars in medical bills, that they have some kind of backup fund from the federal government. This is typically called reinsurance. And insurance companies say they would feel more comfortable enrolling Obamacare enrollees if they had that assurance they wouldn’t go broke if they get one really expensive patient.

CORNISH: For people listening who do have insurance coverage through an Affordable Care Act or Obamacare exchange, should they expect any changes to their health care or insurance just in the coming months?

KLIFF: A lot of that depends on where you live. I’d say generally the picture nationally is – we are seeing possibly some significant premium increases in 2018 because insurance companies are not sure about those cost-sharing reduction subsidies. The Blue Cross plan in North Carolina, for example, is tacking 14 percent onto their premium rate increase.

But states, particularly those that have done a lot of work to mitigate some of this uncertainty, a place like California, you’re not going to see a lot of change. But then you have other places that haven’t been as enthusiastic adopters. And I should also mention we right now have 19 counties across the country in Indiana and Nevada with no insurance plans signed up to sell coverage in 2018. If that doesn’t get fixed, those people will not be able to purchase an Obamacare plan next year.

CORNISH: Sarah Kliff is senior health care policy correspondent at Vox. Thank you for speaking with us.

KLIFF: Yeah, thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF PILOTE SONG, “SHAPESHIFTER BLUES”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)