July 4, 2017

No Image

Comics on Film: Can a 'Superman: Red Son' Movie Lead to More Alternate-Universe Spin-offs?

This week, a rather surprising rumor began to crop up surrounding the superhero film genre, particularly as it relates to the original superhero. At the movies, DC Comics’ icon and original superhero Superman has always been portrayed as the heroic standard-bearer of any film universe he occupies. Christopher Reeve basically defined the cinematic superhero when he first donned the red cape in 1978, and subsequent Supermen following Reeve have always shown us a character who was clearly and definitively heroic in his world.

However, with interactions on Twitter between prominent people in the movie business hinting at multiple pitches based on popular alternate-universe story Red Son, could we potentially see a new trend emerge, showing us alternate — and perhaps even unsettling — visions of the icons of DC Comics?

The Possibilities

As we detailed earlier this week, the revelation of apparent pitches regarding an adaptation of Superman: Red Son — the 2003 story reimagining the Man of Steel as a Soviet-raised overlord — has been pitched at least twice (that we know about) to the keepers of the character at Warner Bros. Pictures. Apparently, those pitches were passed up, but it should be at least partially encouraging to those with hopes of seeing an alternate take on popular superheroes just based on WB’s apparent receptivity in hearing the idea out in the first place, and on more than one occasion.

When first released as a prestige format 3-issue limited series, Superman: Red Son by writer Mark Millar (Marvel’s Civil War, Kick-Ass) and artist Dave Johnson (Batman: Black and White) was pretty revelatory. It was released under DC’s “Elseworlds” imprint, which was first designed to reimagine many of DC’s characters in situations and circumstances that are, sometimes, extremely different from what fans know. Another great Elseworlds tale includes JLA: The Nail, which presented the DC Universe in an almost identical way to the traditional DCU, except for one pivotal fact: when driving out in the county on a fateful day near Smallville, Jonathan and Martha Kent’s truck hit a nail, causing a flat tire. That resulted in them not finding a certain baby in a rocketship, leading to Kal-El’s far more protracted path to becoming Superman.

Another great one was Batman: Gotham by Gaslight, written by Brian Augustyn and illustrated by Hellboy creator Mike Mignola. Generally seen as the original Elseworlds story, it takes place in 1889, and Gotham’s most prominent citizen, Bruce Wayne, has been framed for a series of murders that were, in actuality, committed by none other than Jack the Ripper. So, Gotham by Gaslight features Batman vs. Jack the Ripper in 1889, which is fully as awesome as it sounds.

Of course, DC has released a plethora of Elseworlds stories that go far beyond their two most recognizable heroes, and if the movies are open to at least partial adaptations of those crazier sets of rules, then WB’s ability make more, varied movie experiences based on DC properties exponentially increases.

How Would Alternate Universe Films Fit into the DCEU?

Obviously, creating alternate universe stories may complicate aspects of the burgeoning DC Extended Universe, so the creation of Elseworlds stories would likely work best under the formula recently established by a rival studio on one of their biggest franchises.

With the release of Rogue One this past December, Disney showed the world that a series not necessarily tied to the main, ongoing narrative of a prime film series can absolutely work both critically and commercially. We know that the House of Mouse basically plans on releasing Star Wars movies until…well, forever, and given the expansive nature of DC Comics source material that WB has access to, there’s a nearly infinite well of material a larger-spanning film series can offer if they ever decided to think seriously about beefing up their line of DC movies even further by twisting their icons a little bit.

Of course, the most obvious difference between Elseworlds stories and the Star Wars spin-off films is that in the case of the latter, those films are all very much in-continuity with every other released Star Wars film. Making clear that potential Elseworlds films would be separate from the mainline DC Extended Universe likely wouldn’t be all that difficult, though. That name in and of itself, “Elseworlds,” does a pretty effective job in illustrating what the function of the story itself could be, and how movies under its banner could operate separately from the main films.

If a movie was titled, Superman: Red Son – An Elseworlds Story, then you could make clear to viewers everywhere that this wouldn’t encroach on the unfolding continuity that we’ve seen in the likes of Man of Steel, Wonder Woman, and the upcoming Justice League. Of course, this is all speculation on our part, but, as a comic book fan, it’s hard not to get excited at the mere possibility of seeing a Soviet Superman, or a 19th century Batman fully realized on the big screen.

Think about it, WB. It could be glorious.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Kaspersky's Russian Roots Come Under Scrutiny

The Pentagon may soon be prohibited from using anti-virus software and other products from Kaspersky Lab. The Moscow-based company is alleged to have ties to the Kremlin, which Kaspersky denies.

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Other than vodka, the Russian product most familiar to Americans is probably the antivirus software made by Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab. And the Pentagon might soon be prohibited from using any Kaspersky products. The House and Senate Armed Services Committees have both just approved such a ban for the military. They cite ties to the Kremlin, which Kaspersky denies. NPR’s David Welna has our story.

DAVID WELNA, BYLINE: Things began to look bad for Kaspersky Lab in the middle of a hearing that the Senate intelligence committee held in mid-May. Six intelligence agency chiefs sat at the witness table, and Florida Republican Marco Rubio had a question for all of them.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MARCO RUBIO: Kaspersky Lab software is used by, if not hundreds of thousands, millions of Americans. To each of our witnesses, I would just ask, would any of you be comfortable with Kaspersky Lab software on your computers?

WELNA: Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats was the first to answer.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

DAN COATS: A resounding no for me.

WELNA: Then National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MICHAEL ROGERS: No.

WELNA: One by one, all six said no. For James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the chorus of no’s came as no surprise, given that the firm’s owner, Eugene Kaspersky, studied at a KGB cryptography institute.

JAMES LEWIS: And he still has a company that operates out of Moscow. So for an intelligence agency, those are going to be red flags.

WELNA: Lewis says his own suspicions about Kaspersky were piqued by a conversation with Russia’s ambassador to the U.N.

LEWIS: One day, he came up to me and he said, in Russia, we have saying that once you are a member of security service, you never leave. And I said, well, that’s not true in the U.S. And he said, well, it should be. And then he walked off. And as he was walking away from me, I thought, what did he just tell me about Eugene Kaspersky?

(SOUNDBITE OF YOUTUBE VIDEO)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Please put your hands together for Kaspersky Lab’s very own chairman and CEO, Eugene Kaspersky.

WELNA: A video that Kaspersky Lab posted last year on YouTube shows the company’s owner striding onto a stage in front of employees with its North American division. Kaspersky’s message to them was the world needs our products.

(SOUNDBITE OF YOUTUBE VIDEO)

EUGENE KASPERSKY: The world is vulnerable. It’s a dark age of the cybersecurity.

WELNA: Kaspersky Labs said its CEO was not available to talk to NPR, but his firm did issue a statement saying, quote, “it is completely unacceptable that the company is being unjustly accused without any hard evidence to back up these false allegations.” Over the weekend, Kaspersky told the Associated Press that reports were true that FBI agents had recently visited at least a dozen Kaspersky employees in the U.S. And while Kaspersky also acknowledged having former Russian spies on his staff to the AP, he denied any wrongdoing.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

KASPERSKY: The company stays on the bright side of the cybersecurities. So we do all the best to protect our customs. We stay in the bright side and never, never, never go to that dark side.

WELNA: Some who know the firm well hold it in high regard.

RICK HOLLAND: Kaspersky in the cybersecurity community has a very good name.

WELNA: That’s Rick Holland at Forrester Research. He tracked Kaspersky Lab for years.

HOLLAND: I know many people that work there. I know many Americans that work there, so they’re thought very highly of. But given the political climate, it’s kind of not surprising that you would see this come up again.

WELNA: And despite doubts about Eugene Kaspersky, cybersecurity expert Lewis has praise for his firm.

LEWIS: They make a good product. They do good research. I use some of their research myself. So there’s no question about the company or what it makes. There’s questions about where it happens to be headquartered.

WELNA: Do you use Kaspersky to safeguard your computer?

LEWIS: (Laughter) No.

WELNA: The Pentagon has not said whether it uses Kaspersky products, but the threat of a ban clearly has Eugene Kaspersky worried. He’s now offering to move more of his company’s research to the U.S. and even make its source code available for American officials to inspect. David Welna, NPR News, Washington.

MCEVERS: We should say Kaspersky Lab is among NPR’s financial supporters.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)