July 2, 2017

No Image

Why Does The Electric Guitar Need A Hero?

Gibson and Fender, two of the biggest companies making guitars are in debt. One reason is declining sales in electric guitars and the waning popularity of guitar heroes in popular culture.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

This weekend, we asked you to hit us up on Twitter and let us know your favorite road trip songs. We’ll get to those in a few minutes. But first, we want to bring you a couple of stories about some new trends in music. For decades, one of the more defining sounds of American music has been the electric guitar.

(SOUNDBITE OF CHUCK BERRY’S “JOHNNY B. GOODE”)

MARTIN: The legends who played them, from Chuck Berry to Eric Clapton, inspired generations of would-be rockers. But now, electric guitar sales are down. And guitar heroes these days are harder to find. NPR’s Denise Guerra has this report.

DENISE GUERRA, BYLINE: For over a year, Geoff Edgers, arts reporter for The Washington Post, couldn’t shake a statistic out of his head.

GEOFF EDGERS: About 10 years ago, there were about a million and a half electric guitars sold a year. And last year, it was down to about a little over a million. So, you know, 500,000 fewer new guitars being sold, that struck me as dramatic.

GUERRA: That fact inspired him to spend a better part of a year to find out, what’s happened to the electric guitar? He’s talked to the big players in the industry, from the guitar makers – Gibson and Fender – to some guitar-playing legends, sellers and even spent time at the “School of Rock.” He’s found several reasons for the decline – over-production and new technology that can make a guitar sound without a guitar. But the biggest factor, Edgers says, is the lack of a modern day guitar hero.

(SOUNDBITE OF GUITAR)

EDGERS: What I found is a dramatic shift in the sort of role that the electric guitar plays in popular culture, not only in sales but just in, like, life.

GUERRA: Everyone’s definition of a guitar hero is different but only one really matters for retailers. Do they have the power to get people to go out and buy a guitar?

(SOUNDBITE OF GUITAR)

GUERRA: This is Jennifer Batten. She played lead guitar for Michael Jackson’s world tours in the ’80s and ’90s. She says the guitar hero of that era was Eddie Van Halen.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

JENNIFER BATTEN: He was the most innovative, had the most unique sound. He was the first one to have a really wacky paint job on his guitar and having one-piece overalls that were red and black and white. It was just so in your face and special.

GUERRA: The electric guitar was the coolest accessory any kid could have, and Van Halen wasn’t without company. There was Jimi Hendrix…

(SOUNDBITE OF JIMI HENDRIX’S “VOODOO CHILD”)

GUERRA: …Stevie Ray Vaughan…

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

GUERRA: …Santana.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

GUERRA: Nearly all guitar heroes of that era were men.

(SOUNDBITE OF GUITAR)

GUERRA: Jennifer Batten’s own guitar hero was a dude – Jeff Beck. He inspired her so much, she enrolled in the Guitar Institute of Technology in Los Angeles.

BATTEN: I didn’t realize till the class began that I was the only woman in the whole school. At that time, there was 60 students total – 59 guys and me.

GUERRA: That appears to be changing. Women could be the new hope for the electric guitar. That’s according to Luis Peraza of Atomic Guitar in Maryland. He’s been selling new and used guitars for 24 years. And about five years ago, he started noticing a trend.

LUIS PERAZA: There’s a lot of young women playing guitar and a lot of parents that like taking their kids to, like, these rock schools and camps.

GUERRA: Down the aisle, I found Anna Lachtichinina and Nick Duque testing out some models. Both are in their early 20s. I asked them if they can name any guitar players today with Van Halen-like status.

ANNA LACHTICHININA: There’s not really, like, prominent ones. You know what I mean?

NICK DUQUE: Super famous right now? I mean, I – oh, God. That’s a really hard question.

GUERRA: Geoff Edgers, The Washington Post reporter, says this sort of response really scares the guitar industry.

EDGERS: You know, the electric guitar is not going to go away completely, but you have to ask where it’s going to bottom out.

GUERRA: And that’s why the industry is desperate for a hero. Denise Guerra, NPR News.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Marvel Buzz: 'Spider-Man' Sequel Timeline Revealed, Six Mystery 'X-Men' Movies Scheduled Through 2021

In one week, audiences will finally get to see the spectacular new reboot of everyone’s favorite wallcrawler. And in anticipation of Spider-Man: Homecoming, we’re hearing more about the future of Spidey in the MCU through his next team-up with the Avengers and his next solo feature. That and the latest from the Marvel-based X-Men movieverse below.

Spider-Man: Homecoming 2 Continues Right After Avengers 4

Marvel is very interested in direct continuations right now. Spidey’s new movie begins immediately after the events of Captain America: Civil War. I hear that Avengers: Infinity War picks up immediately after the events of Thor: Ragnarok. And now comes word that Spidey’s next movie (let’s call it Spider-Man: Homecoming 2 for now) will begin immediatly following the end of Avengers 4. Here’s what Homecoming producer Amy Pascal :

I don’t know anything about it or what it’s about. I know who the villain is, but that’s it. They don’t let me read anything because I’m so bad at keeping secrets.

So he believes it’s just him. That villain, by the way, we also all know already to be Thanos. Holland also seems to know enough to not need to spoil anything because the hype is so huge. He continues:

Infinity War needs no teasing. That movie literally needs no teasing. It’s going to be the biggest movie of all time. Believe me: no one is ready for this movie.

Avengers: Infinity War arrives in theaters on May 4, 2018.

Fox Schedules Six More Unknown X-Men Universe Movies

While not part of the MCU, the Marvel Comics-based X-Men franchise is starting to rival its spiritual cousin as a hugely successful cinematic universe, with audiences and critics. Therefore, we can anticipate a lot more mutants in mainline series sequels and spin-offs starring other popular characters, like Deadpool. Fox, the studio behind this growing mega-franchise, has just announced release dates for six more features. We don’t know what they are, but here’s how the X-Universe is looking through 2021:

April 13, 2018: New Mutants (now co-starring Alice Braga in place of exiting Rosario Dawson)

June 1, 2018: Deadpool 2

November 2, 2018: X-Men: Dark Phoenix

February 14, 2019: TBA

June 7, 2019: TBA

November 22, 2019: TBA

March 13, 2020: TBA

June 26, 2020: TBA

October 2, 2020: TBA

March 5, 2021: TBA

We can assume at least one of those is another Deadpool sequel, and maybe that long-delayed Gambit movie will finally happen. Could we see a Stark sisters reunion through this franchise with X-Men‘s Sophie Turner and New Mutants Maisie Williams eventually meeting? Could we be seeing a new Wolverine make his debut in one of these, or could fans possibly go the next four years without their favorite razor-clawed X-Man?

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

NBA: Free Agency, Steph Curry And More

The Golden State Warriors Steph Curry just signed a $200 million deal — the largest in league history. NPR’s Michel Martin speaks with Washington Post columnist Jerry Brewer about the latest in NBA.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Let’s talk basketball for a few minutes. Sure, you’re probably watching baseball or tennis or NASCAR or cycling right now, but this is the time of year when the business side of hoops kicks into high gear. This weekend marked the start of free agency. That means that players who are eligible for free agency are signing huge contracts. The Golden State Warriors’ Steph Curry just signed a $200 million deal, the richest in league history.

But here’s a thing that’s also getting a lot of attention, some players are taking less money to play for teams they prefer, teams that they think can better set them up for championship contention. Think LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami. Jerry Brewer just wrote about this for The Washington Post where he’s a columnist, and he’s with us now via Skype. Jerry Brewer, thanks so much for speaking with us.

JERRY BREWER: Thanks for having me.

MARTIN: So first, let’s talk about the money because the numbers seem staggering. How is it that players are able to command such high salaries?

BREWER: Well, when the NBA did their new television deal, it was a mega-billion-dollar deal. And salary is a function of revenue, so the salary cap in the NBA has shot up. It was $70 million in 2015. It’s shot up to 94 for the 2016-’17 season. And now for the ’17-’18 season, it’s going to go up to 99 million. So salaries are rising because the salary cap is going up.

MARTIN: But you also pointed out in your column that money isn’t everything for these players. I mean, for example, that, you know, Los Angeles Clippers just traded Chris Paul – their star point guard – to the Houston Rockets. He actually took less money to play for what he hopes might be the latest super team. And I just want to read a line from your column.

You said, (reading) the modern NBA superstar is the most powerful genre of athlete in American professional team sports history. Those elite players have it all – the riches, the platform, the influence, the savvy about the league’s business and the audacity to use everything for their own good no matter the consequences. The latter two things, the know-how and the nerve, frighten and intrigue at once. It’s an uneasy feeling because it’s unfamiliar.

Uneasy to who?

BREWER: I think it’s uneasy for fans who would like there to be a little more competitive balance. I think it’s uneasy for – definitely owners. The NBA has a super-max system now that they’re trying to do something where if you have a star, you can pay him more to stay with you than to take less to go. But the stars are saying, you know what? That’s very nice that you’re offering me $42 million a year. Let me think about it.

Which is just unprecedented. These guys make so much money off the court in terms of shoe deals and endorsements, so they have a lot of power because they have the power to say no and change a system which is designed for the guy to just take the most money and be happy.

MARTIN: Is the issue here for fans that if just a few teams would command all of the attention that that somehow would be bad for the league on the whole?

BREWER: That is the argument. I mean, what’s the point in following a league for six months of regular season and two months of the playoffs just when we know that it’s going to be Cleveland and Golden State again? I would argue, though, that the intrigue of the NBA has never been about widespread parity. It’s always been about super teams and dominance.

It’s interesting now, though, the difference is is that it’s not just big-market team doing the dominating. It is Golden State, which went 40 years without a championship before they put this team together. It’s Cleveland, which has had a really tough run until LeBron James came. It’s not just about the market anymore, it’s about which organizations are going to have the competence to help me reach my goals.

MARTIN: That’s Jerry Brewer. He’s a columnist for The Washington Post. We reached him via Skype. Jerry, thanks so much for speaking with us.

BREWER: Anytime.

(SOUNDBITE OF JOHN TESH’S “ROUNDBALL ROCK”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Health Care Questions Enter Virginia Governor's Race

Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Ed Gillespie is getting questions about health care on the campaign trail. His Democratic rival, Ralph Northam, is also making it a campaign issue.

LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:

Republicans in Congress are worried about the political consequences of their proposed health care legislation, but they aren’t the only ones. The Republican running for governor of Virginia is now facing lots of questions about health care, too. Here’s NPR’s Sarah McCammon.

SARAH MCCAMMON, BYLINE: A barbershop in downtown Richmond was the setting for a forum on opioid addiction hosted by a local radio station Friday night. Republican candidate Ed Gillespie, who’s white, addressed a mostly black audience sitting on sofas in salon chairs in a small upstairs loft as men sat for haircuts and beard trims below. Gillespie promised to look for bipartisan solutions to the addiction crisis facing the country.

ED GILLESPIE: I am constantly listening, always looking for new ideas and always looking for them everywhere.

MCCAMMON: Gillespie is running in one of the few high-profile races of 2017. In the governor’s race, he’s up against Virginia’s lieutenant governor, Democrat Ralph Northam. Gillespie won last month’s Republican primary by just a few thousand votes, beating back a surprisingly strong challenger who’d styled himself after President Trump.

He’s now trying to appeal to moderates as well as conservatives in a state that’s become increasingly friendly to Democrats over the past couple of decades. As he was wrapping up his remarks, a woman stepped forward to ask Gillespie about the health care bills before Congress. Lawmakers are still negotiating how to fund treatment for opioid addiction.

GILLESPIE: I look forward to following up. Thank you for letting me join you here this evening.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Sorry, do you support Donald Trump’s health care repeal, then? Because it guts funding for opioid and addiction problems.

GILLESPIE: A lot of my friends are working to get that fixed.

MCCAMMON: The woman followed up before being cut off by the moderators. The Republicans nationally campaigned on repealing the Affordable Care Act in 2016. Gillespie has been met with pushback on the idea from Virginia voters at campaign events across the state. He’s repeatedly responded by outlining goals like reducing premiums and making sure Virginia doesn’t lose out on federal funding because of its refusal to expand Medicaid under Obamacare.

On Thursday night, Susan Mariner of Virginia Beach was among several protesters who stood outside a Gillespie fundraiser in Norfolk. She says she’s concerned about government estimates that millions of people will lose insurance under the Republican proposals.

SUSAN MARINER: I think that’s unconscionable. And I absolutely want Gillespie to come out and let me know how he stands on this issue. I think that voters need to understand where he stands.

MCCAMMON: At a press conference last week, Democrat Ralph Northam, himself a physician, called on Gillespie to denounce the repeal effort.

(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)

RALPH NORTHAM: It is devastating for the Commonwealth of Virginia. And if he’s not willing to denounce the plan, I would ask, why does he support the current plan?

MCCAMMON: Northam says the Republican plans would cost Virginia more than a billion dollars in lost Medicaid funds over the next decade. Outside the barbershop in Richmond, Gillespie criticized Northam, who said the Affordable Care Act needs improvement, for supporting a system that Gillespie says isn’t working. Asked by reporters about the proposals before Congress, he declined to take a position.

GILLESPIE: And we don’t know what’s in the bill before the Senate right now. Senators don’t know what’s in the bill before the Senate right now. They’re in recess, trying to rework it. So we’ll see what comes out.

MCCAMMON: Stephen Farnsworth, a political scientist at the University of Mary Washington, says the sooner the health care debate is over, the better for Ed Gillespie.

STEPHEN FARNSWORTH: It’s very difficult for any politician to support a plan that takes something away from people.

MCCAMMON: With Republicans in control of Washington, he says, how they handle issues like health care will inevitably reflect on Republicans running for office back home. Sarah McCammon, NPR News, Richmond.

(SOUNDBITE OF TYCHO’S “SPECTRE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)