June 22, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Darth Vader vs. Tony Montana, the Definitive 'Alien' Xenomorph Life Cycle and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup of the Day:

In the latest Phone Fights video, Darth Vader from Star Wars and Tony Montana from Scarface have a heated conversation:

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

Kyle Hill attempts to scientifically explain the definitive xenomorph life cycle as depicted in the Alien movies:

[embedded content]

Fake Movie Poster of the Day:

Who else watched the first act of Wonder Woman and imagined a sequel to The Princess Bride?

“Farm boy, polish my armor. I want to see my face shining in it by morning.” pic.twitter.com/BvvLCvh4Zv

— Tarah M. Wheeler (@tarah) June 20, 2017

Soundtrack Cover of the Day:

With Transformers: The Last Knight in theaters, The Warp Zone offers up an a capella cover of “The Touch” from Transformers: The Movie (and Boogie Nights):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Meryl Streep, who turns 68 today, with Kevin Kline and director Alan J. Pakula on the set of Sophie’s Choice in 1982. Streep would go on to win her second Oscar, her first for Best Actress, for her performance.

Actress in the Spotlight:

Mubi pays tribute to Greta Gerwig with this video montage that mostly features clips of her dancing:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Watch an animated Woody Allen talk about food, showers and luck in an adaptation of a 2013 Esquire interview:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Speaking of Woody Allen, you can’t have a New York in film supercut without some of his movies, so of course this one does (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Cosplayer Philip Odango shows off two ’80s movie villains he’s dresed up as, Mola Ram from Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and Lo-Pan from Big Trouble in Little China (via Fashionably Geek):

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 40th anniversary of the release of Disney’s The Rescuers. Watch the original trailer for the animated classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

OB-GYNs Give Women More Say In When They Have Mammograms

Women have gotten conflicting advice from doctors about when to have mammograms.


Amelie Benoist/Science Source
hide caption

toggle caption


Amelie Benoist/Science Source

Women in their 40s at average risk for breast cancer should talk to their health care provider about the risks and benefits of mammography before starting regular screening at that age, according to guidelines released Thursday by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The group had previously recommended annual mammograms starting at age 40. But the advice has changed to better incorporate input from the woman being screened, says physician Christopher Zahn, vice president of practice activities at ACOG. “A patient’s preferences and values need to be an important part” of the decision, he says.

Now the group says providers should offer the test when a woman enters her 40s, and that after a discussion, she may opt to start screening. If she doesn’t, she should start by age 50, ACOG says. Zahn says the guidance intentionally encompasses advice from other major groups.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force says women should start regular mammograms at 50, and that women in their 40s should make an individual decision about whether or not to screen. The American Cancer Society says screening should be offered starting at age 40, and outright recommends starting at 45. And the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an alliance of major cancer centers, recommends starting at 40.

The question all these groups have wrestled with is how to balance the benefits and harms of mammography; their different recommendations reflect differences in how they interpreted and weighed the available data. “All three [schedules] are reasonable approaches to take,” says Zahn.

Mammography clearly saves lives for women over 50 and likely does so overall for women in their 40s, says Otis Brawley, chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society. But the benefits in those younger women are smaller, and they come at the cost of false alarms, unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis, when cancer that is detected and treated never would have threatened a woman’s health had it gone undiscovered. (The ACS says estimates of overdiagnosis vary widely, from 0 percent to 54 percent of breast cancers, in part depending on whether cases of ductal carcinoma in situ — abnormal cells that sometimes turn into cancer — are included.)

Once a woman starts mammography, she can be screened every one or two years, again after a discussion about the pros and cons of the different schedules, ACOG advises. The American Cancer Society recommends annual screening for women through age 54 and every other year for older women, with the option to continue annual tests, while USPSTF says every other year is sufficient and the network of cancer centers recommends annual screening.

A statistical model from the USPSTF finds that if 1,000 women are screened every other year from age 40 to 74, there will be eight fewer breast cancer deaths compared with no screening, 213 unnecessary breast biopsies and 21 overdiagnosed breast tumors. Meantime, if 1,000 women are screened every other year from 50 to 74, there will be seven fewer breast cancer deaths compared with no screening, 146 unnecessary biopsies and 19 overdiagnosed tumors.

Some women may decide that the small additional benefit doesn’t outweigh the increased risk of biopsy or possibly being treated for a cancer that didn’t need attention. There’s as yet no sure way to know which tumors are harmless and can be left alone. Others may choose differently. “There’s more of a respect for the individual person,” says Brawley about the new ACOG guidelines and the 2015 changes by his own organization. “You’re starting to hear, ‘Let the woman decide.’ “

“If a woman is told to get a mammogram starting at 40, it’s very reasonable to question that and ask, ‘Why? I’ve read that there are conflicting guidelines,’ ” says Deanna Attai, assistant clinical professor of surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

She says women should know, or ask about, the risk factors for breast cancer so they can have the screening conversation with some understanding of where they fall on the spectrum. And don’t stop the risk-reduction discussion at screening. “Ask what lifestyle or health habits can help reduce risk,” she says. (For example, research suggests exercise can cut breast cancer risk.)

On the question of when to stop routine mammograms, ACOG says screening beyond age 75 should be based on a conversation about a woman’s health status and longevity. The group also recommends against regular breast self-exams but says women should be aware of the normal feel and appearance of their breasts so they can report any changes.

Keep in mind that these recommendations are for average-risk women who are not experiencing symptoms. Many factors can increase risk, including a family history of breast or ovarian cancer and certain genetic mutations. So those women should check with their physician about when, how and how frequently they should be screened. There’s also not enough evidence to make recommendations on whether women with dense breasts should be screened differently.


Katherine Hobson is a freelance health and science writer based in Brooklyn, N.Y. She’s on Twitter: @katherinehobson

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Man Accused Of Making Millions Of Robocalls Faces Biggest-Ever FCC Fine

Telemarketers are prohibited from making prerecorded phone calls to people without prior consent. It’s also illegal to deliberately falsify caller ID with the intent to harm or defraud consumers.

PeopleImages/Getty Images/iStock

hide caption

toggle caption

PeopleImages/Getty Images/iStock

Federal regulators on Thursday said they’ve identified “the perpetrator of one of the largest … illegal robocalling campaigns” they have ever investigated.

The Federal Communications Commission has proposed a $120 million fine for a Miami resident said to be single-handedly responsible for almost 97 million robocalls over just the last three months of 2016.

Officials say Adrian Abramovich auto-dialed hundreds of millions of phone calls to landlines and cellphones in the U.S. and Canada and at one point even overwhelmed an emergency medical paging service.

Making prerecorded telemarketing phone calls to people without their prior consent is prohibited. So is making telemarketing calls to emergency phone lines and deliberately falsifying caller ID to disguise identity with the intent to harm or defraud consumers.

According to the FCC, the robocalls made by Abramovich through his ambiguously named companies (Marketing Strategy Leaders or Marketing Leaders) would show up “spoofed” as if they came from a phone number with the same area code and the same first three digits of the recipient’s number.

If the recipients answered, they’d get a recording offering an “exclusive” vacation deal from prominent travel companies such as Expedia, Marriott, Hilton or TripAdvisor — instructing them to “Press 1” to learn more. But pressing 1 would instead land people on a line with a call center hawking “discounted” vacation packages and time-shares unaffiliated with any of those brands.

According to FCC documents, TripAdvisor investigated some of the robocalls that purported to offer that company’s deals and found call centers that it said were based in Mexico.

Abramovich now faces the largest penalty ever proposed by the FCC, according to FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn. The fine is for Abramovich’s unlawful caller ID spoofing, the FCC says. The agency’s Enforcement Bureau has also issued a citation to Abramovich, and the documents say his “mass robocalling campaigns violate the Communications Act, and his misrepresentations in the prerecorded messages constitute criminal wire fraud.”

Abramovich now has 30 days to respond to the FCC, which is expected to finalize the investigation and penalties in the following months.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

NBA Draft Day – The Impossible Dream To Beat The Golden State Warriors?

Golden State Warriors celebrate their 2017 NBA Championship at The Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center in Oakland, Calif., on June 15.

Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

For those too young to remember the NBA’s Michael Jordan era, you’re living it now. The Golden State Warriors are the new Michael Jordan.

When Jordan ruled the earth’s hardwood, everyone else played for second. That’s where we are today with the super team from the Bay Area that just wrapped up its second title in three years.

So why even play games for the next 3 to 5 years? Just build a permanent trophy case in Oakland’s Oracle Arena, right?

WRONG.

Sports, if anything, represent hope. It’s why they play the games. On any given Sunday. David did beat Goliath.

Which brings us to today’s annual day of NBA hope – the draft. Teams will replenish rosters with fresh faced, college-aged talent; they’ll execute trades to move up in the draft order.

Draft day also begins what’s expected to be a frenzied summer that will see the better teams try to beef up AND bolster their rosters in an effort to challenge you-know-who.

Here’s some of what’s being said about the expected frenzy – an offseason drama that may as well be scored to “Man of La Mancha.”

To dream the impossible dream
To fight the unbeatable foe

“Cleveland is closer than anyone to competing with Golden State, and the only player who realistically gets them closer is [Indiana Pacers star Paul] George.”

That’s from a CBSSPORTS.com article titled “Six trades or free-agent signings that could challenge Warriors’ NBA supremacy.” The article also suggests sending Chicago’s Jimmy Butler and Utah’s Gordon Hayward to Boston, Chris Paul of the L.A. Clippers to San Antonio and sums up with the three-team trade that would “save the world.”

To try when your arms are too weary
To reach the unreachable star

If the quest to topple Golden State begins with tonight’s draft, it’s not as easy as taking one of the projected stars, such as Washington’s Markelle Fultz, UCLA’s Lonzo Ball OR Josh Jackson of Kansas. Teams have to get the right players that fit, then develop them into stars, says Neil Paine from fivethirtyeight.com. “To beat the Warriors,” Paine writes, “you have to do what the Warriors did.” That included drafting Draymond Green 35th in 2012. The Warriors did pick Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson in the first round of the 2009 and 2011 drafts respectively. But Curry wasn’t an NBA all-star until 2014 and Thompson, in 2015.

The Warriors, as it turns out, do not have any picks in tonight’s draft. That doesn’t mean they won’t be active – at the right moment. Golden State still could buy a draft pick, which it did last year, getting the Warriors UNLV’s Patrick McCaw. He got regular playing time in his first year, giving him the confidence to play effectively even in critical moments. He played 11 minutes in this month’s title-clinching game and scored 6 points.

Everything Golden State touches, it seems, turns to gold.

OK, almost everything. The Warriors drafted Ekpe Udoh with the 6th pick in the 2010 draft. He’s now playing in Turkey.

Still, Golden State mostly has made the right moves and made itself into a great team that was able to lure Kevin Durant last offseason – a super free-agent signing that turned the Warriors into a super team.

Tonight, the Philadelphia 76ers have the first draft pick – the first official counter move in this new NBA era of “Golden State vs. the World.”

Philly, you’re on the clock.

And so are 28 other NBA teams that will do what they can – draft, trade, buy, sell – to pull closer to the Warriors. Ever closer.

And the world will be better for this
That one man scorned and covered with scars
Still strove with his last ounce of courage
To fight the unbeatable foe, to reach the unreachable star

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Mali's Oumou Sangaré Keeps Speaking Out On 'Mogoya'

For Mogoya, her first album in eight years, Oumou Sangaré enlisted young Swedish and French producers to help rejuvenate her sound.

Benoit Peverelli/Courtesy of the artist

hide caption

toggle caption

Benoit Peverelli/Courtesy of the artist

One of Mali’s most celebrated singers, Oumou Sangaré began her career as an outspoken champion for the rights of women. On her 1989 debut, Moussolou, she offered sharp critiques of practices such as arranged marriages and polygamy, drawing on her own experiences growing up in a polygamous household.

Sangaré’s irresistible voice enhances her music’s power to disarm critics and make defenders of outmoded traditions think twice. She is often referred to as the Songbird of Wassoulou — the name of a region in Mali’s forested south and also the name of a musical style Sangaré has helped define.

But she chose to take stylistic liberties on her new album, Mogoya (which means “Today’s People”). Sangaré enlisted young producers in Sweden and France to create a more contemporary sound, rejuvenating her music and aiming her pointed messages at a younger audience.

Over the course of Mogoya, Sangaré briskly covers important ground: Malians who lose hope in their country and risk their lives trying to reach Europe by sea, the dangers of gossip and rumors, the breakdown of trust between people in the wake of Mali’s recent political crises. And in the song “Yere Faga,” which features Afrobeat drummer Tony Allen, she takes on the sensitive subject of suicide.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Mogoya is Sangaré’s first album in eight years, and only her fifth studio album in some 30 years. That’s partly because Sangaré also owns a hotel in Mali and runs other businesses, remaining unencumbered by the normal rigors of a pop music career. She makes a new album only when she’s good and ready, which shows in the work: Though Mali undoubtedly punches far above its weight in producing great and innovative music, Mogoya is still a landmark release.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)